Pearl Izumi X-ALP Launch
• Lace closure with lace keeper
• Colors: Men's Smoked Pearl/Monument & Black/Shadow Grey; Women's Pearl/Monument, and Black/Smoked Pearl
• Weight: 340 grams (US M's 8 )
• Sizes: Men's EU 39 - EU 49/ Women's EU 36 - EU 43
• MSRP: $150.00 USD
•
pearlizumi.com/Oh how I love marketing hype…. Pearl Izumi touts this as, “the first flat pedal shoe designed to handle the abuse of all-mountain riding to give you the confidence, control and comfort you need for all-day riding", which strikes me as a bit of a bold claim given that FiveTen came out with their first MTB shoes well over a decade ago. Marketing speak aside, Pearl Izumi makes quality gear. In this case, they’ve crafted a bonded, seamless upper with a reinforced toecap and wrapped that around an EVA midsole for comfort, and then shod the bottom with Vibram’s Megagrip rubber for positive pin engagement in a nice, lightweight package. The outsole under the ball of the foot features a simple siped pattern for pedal pins, while the toe and heel feature molded chevrons for off the bike traction. One care note on the website clearly states that one should keep them away from excessive direct heat as that could cause the rubber to dry out or crack.
Bekah and I tested the women's version of the X-Alp Launch in EU 40 (US M's 7/W's 8 ). The company touted that the only difference between the men's and women's version is that the women's shoes are built on different lasts (foot forms), but that the materials and general construction are the same. Colors aside, the women's version was a very narrow fit for both of our feet. While the length was perfect for our feet, that narrow width took us out of our happy place. I never thought I had fat or wide feet, but this shoe made me feel that way. Otherwise, the internal volume was good, offering enough room in the toe box and a comfortable, cradled feel.
Sizing aside, the shoes were fairly stiff—8 out of 10—and are nicely supportive for your everyday (three hour max) rider. The pedal grip by comparison to some of the other shoes, felt deceptively average. Which was surprising, as this is the same rubber that is found in the Giros. Having said that, they were grippy enough to keep my feet on the pedals in the rock gardens. If you look at the tread pattern, the siping in the pedal zone of the sole is the key: those cross cuts go edge to edge, and allow for solid pin penetration; but the flat sole where the pedal sits combined with the lateral flex of the sipes also allows for easy and intuitive foot adjustments on the pedals. For off the bike traction there are more traditional chevron patterns on the heels and toes, which were perfect for scouting rock gardens or pushing up the silly slippery trails. Speaking of which....as we did do all our testing in the dry season, I would be curious to see how the siped pedal/shoe contact surface performs in mud and rain. Last, breathability was excellent.
When out riding, the narrowness of the shoe was a bit of a problem. There was a bit of a burning sensation across the balls of my feet due to the tightness. I feel like I would err towards ordering the men's version next time I have the opportunity, but it's also important to note that this might be just the perfect option for those of you whose eyes light up when you hear "narrow shoe".
Overall, this shoe is aesthetically pleasing with a nice, cool color scheme and a positively svelte look as compared to most of the other shoes we tested. That svelte look comes at a price, though, as they are not as armored up as some riders might like—I definitely wouldn't want to accidentally smack a rock with these on! However, I would be totally comfortably putting them on for sweltering adventure rides with potential river crossings. Pearl Izumi has a reputation for designing quality riding apparel and these shoes easily meet that standard. For a competitive price they offer solid grip, decent stiffness for pedal power, a svelte style and extra breathability (although the narrow fit won't be for everyone). -NR
 | Pearl Izumi has a reputation for designing quality riding apparel and these shoes easily meet that standard. For a competitive price they offer solid grip, decent stiffness for pedal power, a svelte style and extra breathability (although the narrow fit won't be for everyone). |
Details of the Pearl Izumi X-ALP Launch shoes.
Pros
+ Stylish non-bulky appearance
+ Breathable
322 Comments
(those addidas running shoes don't count)
Any shoe group test that excludes Freerider Pros or any Impact version but call some of the tested shoes "really grippy" is lacking in my opinion
Hard to take a review serious that has such a major and obvious flaw in it. To put so much work into that review and not include the industry standard to judge against undermines the whole point of doing it.
This review gives me some food for thought come my next shoe purchase!
Maybe all our comments will get pinkbike to pay you for an update that includes the free rider/free rider pro. Love to see a follow up of how each compares to the standard
I wish I wasn't flat broke when they closed the warehouse or I would have bought like 10 pairs (local to me).
But, you do you.
The grip is awesome - no question- but durability is not on their prositive side... kind of disappointed...
www.outsideonline.com/1894021/what-does-adidas-five-ten-buyout-mean-climbers
I haven’t put them on my feet yet but have held a pair in my hands. They look way better in person I might ad.
That said, 9/10 5.10 fan bois will probably go back to 5.10 because it's the safe option, even if they're not exactly the same as they used to be.
Speaking of pinkbike, surely you guys could have foreseen the reaction to this article and offered guidance re inclusion of benchmarks in a group test before you published.
Case in point is the Five Ten Freeride Pro, which for my money probably beats all of these.
I do have an old Vans Warner SPD shoe. It wasn’t bad, but the cleat had to be pushed way back to the limit to be near the right spot. But in terms of protection, that shoe was bombproof. It’s too bad they didn’t develop it more over the years.
My only criticism here is when the article says "super grippy sole". I have the GR7s with the same sole as the GR9, and while the grip is good enough, it really pales in comparison to some Five Ten Impacts
The first and only date?
I have the 2FO shoes as I read that they shed water well and dry quickly (which they do), however the tongue is a ridiculous cotton wool material! Hit one medium sized puddle and you've got wet feet for the rest of the ride!
enduro-mtb.com/en/best-flat-pedal-mtb-winter-shoes
Agreed -freerider pros are great during the winter months IME. I just use wool socks. But admittedly most things are frozen here in New England in winter so I am not doing stream crossing or anything where my feet would be submerged
Even in the sloppiest of conditions my feet are usually dry after the ride. The tongue is waterproof up to the velcro, so hiking though shallow water and mud is a non-issue. Hosing them down after a ride is easy, and in case you step in a creek and soak them, I would say they dry as fast or possibly faster than a pair of Five Tens.
Speaking of Five Tens, they are ofc not as grippy. I had to remove the pin washers (One Up) to get comparable grip.
Also once they get wet they stay wet for a long time and don't drain well (this is true for all winter flat-pedal shoes I've tried though).
Agree. They probably discontinued because they lasted too long. Mine are a few seasons old and look like they’ll go for a few more.
Not quite as sticky as my fiveten stealth, but seem to be more durable so far.
Love the boa closure.
Slightly narrow in the forefoot.
There must be some technical, function-over-form reason mountain bike shoes are so ugly, right? They all look like special orthotics for geriatrics. Or boots for Frankenstein’s monster. Can someone tell me why this must be?
Speaking of function over form, can we talk about laces? We want grip and durability, but we are ok with primitive fastener that not only come undone from time to time, but get caught in chainwheels and other places? Well at least Shimano has that cool looking lace cover to keep everything in place.
I found it odd there were no profile shots of any of these shoes.
Finally, I do find it refreshing and helpful, despite other comments to the contrary, that this wasn’t all about 5.10 shoes. Yeah, we know they’re great, although a lot of people have been grumbling about their durability as of late. But it’s good to learn about other options. I know a lot of bro’s swear by them, but would probably be shocked to learn that some of these other options are just as good or maybe better.
To bad I heard to late and could not get the right size. I also asked a year ago if they will produce something new and they told me that they are working on the updated version of the FR-1
I have 2 pairs of the 5.10 Adidas Trailcross (Mid and LT) and despite their sole flexibility, have found them to be nice and light but grippier than other 5.10 soles due to the round knobs being taller. Thus less pedal slippage. The Mid with its neoprene cuff does a great job of keeping trail debris out. I just won't wear these in colder weather and will go back to the more traditional 5.10 models.
Their comment higlights the fact that Five Ten is the standard. What is the point of a standard if you merely talk about it but don't actually use it as a tool for evaluation.
As far as I know, no other company, except unparallel for obvious reasons, has achieved the same level of grip. This "review" talks about the other shoe characteristics but completely avoids the main attribute that affect performance.
Currently riding Leatt Dbx 2.0. Pretty happy with these, sole stiffness is spot on (stiff without loosing pedal feel), they're protective without being bulky and are much better in the wet (don't become as water logged). I find the grip fine but I can see some people might want more. Another plus they were also a lot cheaper than the Giros.
Good shoe though, very stiff
After having used 510 Freerider to Shimano GR7 back to 510 Trailcross, I think Shimano shoes are sorely underrated; they are the perfect size for bike shoes (not skate shoes, not trainers) the Michelin rubber is tacky, but not so much that you cant make adjustments on the pedals. on top of that; they are pretty breathable and you don't get pebbles in your shoes.
I rode some 510s that I got from a clearance sale and while they were fine shoes, they really couldn't do anything better than generic skate shoes.
Best shoes I've ever had for biking (and everything else) were etnies arto saari 3
Basically grip is good enough but everything else sucks.
The other pity is that Adidas have pretty much screwed over the bike shops (and climbing shops for climbing shoes) in NZ for stocking 5Ten's...... try some on before you buy is now impossible as your only option is online from overseas.
Keep my IXV whatever impact's alive because they seem to be a little bit wider with old tires glued to them..
The whole field test is wasted on me because I dont know how the grip compares.
So here's the thing: the above reviews with stiffness ratings are complete and utter nonsense. I have ridden and abused half the shoes on that list. I suspect their impressions were based on limited use of these shoes. Face it, you gotta ride a shoe for months to get adequate break in.
Here are my experiences with shoes that were ridden a full season:
Shimano GR9 are like slippers after a month of riding, mine are currently serving as an indoor spin shoe
Pearl Izumi X Alp are about the same as the Shimano, start soft and only get softer, my wife rides them and she likes soft shoes.
Specialized 2F0 2.0 are terrible shoes, soft, hot, not at all worthy. The first year version was a great shoe, I wore out two pairs.
RC Powerline, not their stiffest shoe by any stretch, even their stiffest shoe (Hellion) was only good for a season before it became a slipper. I like RC cuz their local, but they need to add a midsole stiffener to get my business.
Addidas, well, that's how the Five Ten market crumbles. Pretty much a poser shoe now.
If you want a really stiff shoe that has grippy rubber and durable uppers, look no further than the Northwave Clan. The Clan is designed with a mid sole stiffener, so it actually has stiffness built in and it lasts. I'm surprised the reviewers didn't check out Northwave, they are much better known than a few of the mfgs tested.
Only time I use the freeride pros is with my hardtail as the pedals on it pair better with them. Don’t get me wrong, FR Pro is the standard for a reason but the shimano gr-whatever work better for most of my rides.
Trailcross lt Is for hot weather. Kind of vulnerable. Aftons disintegrated with a kind of papery substance in the front? Shimano are just coming apart at one toebox but are in season two. I will try to glue them.The 2FOs are intact and still feel supportive and are the clear winner in my backyard shootout. I’ll try one of the others next round.
Weakest "con" EVAR. Grey letters on black is obnoxious? You think that's worse than the Bontrager's Vibram yellow highlights everywhere?
I have no issues with any of my shoes moving around, more often I get “stuck” and need to pull up to reposition.
Sounds like you need clipless
I think I will order some on Friday, unless I can pick some up local (and try them on).
Thanks
Of course, it’s entirely different on the road.