With practice for dual slalom, dual speed and style and slopestyle all going off in Innsbruck yesterday, there were plenty of short travel, big fun bikes rolling around the pits. We grabbed as many as we could for public delectation:
Kade Edwards' Trek TicketBas Van Steenbergen's HyperCarson Storch's Rocky Mountain Slopestyle PrototypeBrett Rheeder's Custom Geometry Trek Ticket SMartin Soderstrom's Specialized P SlopeKaos Seagrave's Transition PBJCam Zink's YT PlayPeter Kaizer's Trek Ticket SLouis Reboul's Scott VoltageLucas Shafer's Radon SlushAlfie Stephens' Identiti Dr jekyllGreg Watts' Mongoose FireballMike Ross' Santa Cruz JackalReed Boggs' Trek Ticket SGarrett Mechem's Specialized P SlopeDJ Brandt's Commencal VIP Absolut SX
Edit: yeah maybe, but there comes a point when all we get is crap:
www.pinkbike.com/news/uci-sanctions-downhill-snow-racing-with-potential-world-cup-series-in-2020.html
@bluntaaronr Yeah 4X was huge back then. You even had the Jeep series (where the series winner gets a Jeep). Sadly Tara Llanes came off really bad and is now in a wheelchair (still rippin though) but I recall it was a huge event. Jill Kintner won a couple of Jeeps, Anneke Beerten got one too. I think prize money is nowhere near that level these days.
Now that I've said that, it really isn't a good representation of what (imo) mountain biking is, but it is the epitome of skilled riding and discipline.
My favourite discipline was always dual slalom. The closest big coverage comes is pump track..
There's the 4X Pro Tour, without the evil hand of the UCI, just like everybody wished.
Does anyone gives a single f#ck when reports from those races show up here on PB?
Exactly, just about 0 people.
4X is dead. Other than old BMXers from 3 or 4 countries it doesn't apeal to anyone, riders or industry.
It was nice while it lasted, but it really is dead.
On another hand dual slalom requires a fricking grass field, a few poles and one day of digging if you want some berms. You can use Poles to dig
@AntN if 4X would get any more professionalized DH racers would have no place there, they’d get mauled by BMX racers if they were paid enough so it would be worth to compete.
classic!
Then everything is about participation and we have to look at it from the perspective of both racers and the people using it as a play/training ground. For racers, you want crabapple bits sized jumps all he way. Otherwise what’s the point when BMX racers send insane tripples? Having stuff like that will not attract average riders. You can theoretically form these jumps so that they are tripples or have a smaller lip next to them but that’s extra construction/ maintenance/ land cost issue. And back to average riders big stuff simply means more risk of injuries. And the rates of injuries on such stuff are high. I have a feeling that 4X is romanticized mainly by upcoming big mouth wannabies who wouldn’t send that stuff themselves anyways. Amd racers? Really? How much can you get paid for racing 4X?
Now back to it being participation sport because that’s what really drives everything, since people pay money for riding stuff they like. You can get financing from the local authorities but for that it has to be very accessible. That is why pumptracks are so great. You can place them anywhere and get all ages with all sorts of bikes to ride them. From a kick bike, 12” strider to Enduro bike. BMX tracks are a similar case. You can build them near city centers and get kids to ride them. Municipalities are 10 thousand times more likely to give money for a pumptrack and BMx track than a 4X track. Examples like Szczawno Zdroj in Poland where the track is visited by locals as well as tourists passing by on the way to the mountains are extremely few, possibly no more than 3.
And then to go back to Slalom, a ski/bike resort can just put a few poles in the open grass field at the end of the ski slope AND(!) you can train people on them, have skills clinics from cornering, with huge benefit to the overall biking community. Little money, big effect.
Not everything is down to the buck, resorts are often run by passionate people, but when it comes to 4X you get very little for huge sums of money.
That said, I don't bash BMX by any means. To be honest it's been good while that I've seen a life feed of a mountainbike race. I saw the pumptrack challenge from the semi finals onwards yesterday but that's it. I've watched a good few UCI WC BMX races right until this past weekend (France). Even though it is often decided after the second corner (after that it typically only changes because of a mistake or maybe when it is close and someone sprints faster on the final straight) I just love to see how they jump. Because the bike is so low they've got so much room to move around, I love to watch that.
But yeah both 4X and BMX are typically decided after the second corner. Unless there are many lines tech lines to choose, like what Vigo had. Features like that wallride that Michael Marosi overtook on help too. BMX can't have that. You can have big jumps but you can't have rough terrain. They can go fast but they can't be effective at both high and low speeds which bikes with gears can. If you loose your speed on a BMX, you've lost. So this is what 4X could be. Multiple tech lines, slow and fast, rough and smooth, features like wallrides and box jumps. Basically make them big BMX bikes so that they could go fast and big didn't do them justice.
Can anyone explain why?