huh... This vid just messed me up. I don't know whether I am just marketing following sheep or not. I am considering buying an trail/AM bike, but since I have an excellent linkage AM/FR bike, I am so affraid of getting a singlepivot. Somehow I always thought that linkages are so much better. Then I see this vid and it just makes me want to buy this super simple bike! aaaaa! More I know, worse it is...
I just love all these all-mountain rippers coming out. When I started getting real serious about mountain biking ten years ago, you had xc machines and DH machines. Now I can have my cake and eat it too. God bless us everyone.
Waki, what makes you think single pivots are worse than multi link bikes? They have many more good things about them than multi link bikes... and if designed well, can ride just as good as any multi link bike.
Single pivot bikes have half the issues other bikes do. There is less points of failure, much LESS friction in suspension movement, as more bearings on multi link all add to friction. More bearings on multi link bikes means more bearings to go out, and need maintenance. Multi link bikes are generally more flexy than single pivot bikes due to more end points on the metal (each bolt adds a place of flex). In other words... it is actually more of a headache to go the multi pivot route. I have to say, outside of a select few multi link bikes like the canfields, I'm 100% single pivot now, and probably won't switch back.
Ever wonder why you rarely hear about single pivot peeps complaining about bad bearings, or needing replacement parts? They generally never do.
Also, companies like Tomac, with their new frames, have proven you can make one of the best riding bikes on the planet using only a single pivot design. Proven, reliable, and a great ride.
In other words... don't be afraid of single pivots. You won't be unhappy with the switch... but only if you get a decently designed single pivot (in which the Oranges have proven to be)
I don't know why I thought that, it's just I am a techno freak you know. At the same time Santa Cruz makes one of the best linkage bikes along side of top 10 best single pivots: Heckler and Superlight and maybe Bullit (67 HA for 180 fork is a bit strange to me).
Well this Orange might speak to me if it's price gets well below the price of Blur LT2. If it was the price of SC Heckler, I wouldn't think twice. Right now Five is only slightly cheaper. Brits have some serious labour/manufacturing costs, they need more emigrants
Best thing to do man, is try it out. When it comes down to it, its 100% rider pref.
There are also cons to look at single pivot bikes tho. Like others said, brake jack (but this in no way effects all frames and design), lack of plushness persay (you will see what I'm saying when you get on one). Single pivots will never have that bottomless plush feel a horst link etc will have. (Even comparing my old azonic frame, a giant faith, and my tomac, my tomac is the stiffest feeling linkage out of 3, even with a super light coil on the shock). It's a love/hate ordeal. Some people get off on that ultra plush ride of multi link, but some like something a bit more rigid that tracks pretty crazily well.
Definitely would never rule single pivots out. The "trendy" ones that dominate pink bike seem to be a plague. and hurt the simpler designs (everyone thinks stuff needs to be high tech to work well... in that case people need to put gear boxes on their bikes, and add every single possible thing they can think of too the frame to add to that cool factor
It almost seems like a pissing contest on who has the newest most expensive, most color matched, most technologically advanced bike[because we all know that vpp or fsr design is going to turn each of us into elite world cup racers. (makes me wonder how many guys on here actually have a family, or a girlfriend). Sad people have shed such a bad light on stuff that is pretty damn decent. I'm always pleasently surprised when I demo a single pivot that to me rides better than any of the multi link bikes on demo. Just reinforces the fact that sometimes simplicity is better for certain people. (hipsters need not apply... they can stick to their chick pants and fixies)
Heh man, I have no chance to try out Orange Five. But good thing is, with bikes like these I am sure I get satisfaction guaranteed. Some bikes are like that: Nomad, Blur LT, Orange FIVE or 223, Sx Trail, Trek Remedy / Session 88, Banshee Spitfire, Intense SS and a few more.
And single pivots vs linkage heheh. I rode cousins Heckler and it's super fun, different but superfun. This year I will ride it much more and this will make me decide. Only thing that Nomad does great it feels almost like DH bike in the bike park, still being able to ride trails well. This is when I am getting affraid of getting a single pivot trail bike. Can it do that too? Can it still feel like a FR bike a bit? It's all in the skills, but mine are average, and I'm too deep into job and family life to improve that significantly
And yes I serviced my Nomad twice already, didn't have issues with the bearings but still to even grease the axles I hade one thought in the back of my head while doing that: f**ck that sh*t! I want a f* single pivot
Uhhh why change a good thing? All they'd do by changing stuff is take away from the "sweet spot" they have already found.
They didn't need to make changes in order to make the vid. Many people have never seen an in-depth look at orange bikes... so this is exactly what it was for. Less new product, more just looking into a good proven product the company has to offer.
I moved off from SUNN multipivot to Orange Alpine, i feel much more comfortable with it. I've ridden motorcycles around 8 years and all of them were single pivots, the rear suspension movement/response feels alot more natural compared to the SUNN 4-link.
Granted the SUNN Kern climbed like rabid weasel compared to the Alpine... but that can be replaced with more muscles.
But when i point Alpine downhill it is so much faster...
Personally i dont feel big pedal bob compared to the 4-link i had, there is noticeable pedal kickback when suspension compresses and extends but this does not bother me.
Steve Peat couldn't even win worlds on a single pivot...that's how poor the design is.
What about wining World Cup DH Champion in 2002 and 2004 riding for Team Orange
On a single pivot
That is the most ignorant comment I have ever heard.
Also, do you really think it's the bike that puts these guys to the top? Man, you are so far off it's not even funny. Your 27 for god sakes... you should be ashamed of yourself.
It's the rider that wins races bro. Stop thinking bikes are the reason why people win world cups...
I bet you never realized, that companies like Santa Cruz have WAAAY bigger of a budget... which means they a : pay their pros more, b: provide their pros with almost everything they need, from nutritional / supplements, to weight training setups and workout gear and machines etc. So if anything, why people win on Santa Cruz, Specialized, Trek, Yeti etc is because of how much money they put into the pro they are sponsoring... which allows him to train harder, get stronger quicker, and be more consistent. The bike is the least changing in the variables of winning a cup. It's all about the support. I bet if you ask peaty... he would say he probably had a lot less of the support that he has now when he was on orange. Orange is a small company...
Canfield doesn't win world cups... does that mean the Canfield Jedi frames are bad? Avalanche doesn't win cups, does that mean the avy forks are bad? White brothers doesn't win cups... does that mean they are bad? I don't think you guys know how much it costs a company to support a top 3 ranked world champ. Probably more than most of you guys and your parents combined make in a year.
Used to have one, great bike, but VPP is far better than Oranges single pivot and i've had 3 intenses now, and they have all been far superior.
The Five just locked under braking making stutter bumps, bumpy corners a complete nightmare.
Can't help it on some courses, especially those with no smooth sections. If my bike causes me to have to ride in a particular way to make up for its technical limitations, its not the bike for me. I'd rather have the choice of riding however i want.
motocross bikes are single pivot for durability and they dont worry about pedal feedback, pedal bob and brake jack. Bicycles are pedal powered so the design should minimize those traits.. DW link, maestro, vpp, FSR for the win!!!
I'm going to get neg propped for this but I am just going to say that the rear triangle looks to bulky and burly for an AM rig.. at least for my liking.
Would buy an Orange 5 if they would work with me to put a sealed drive on it, but have tryed speaking to them, well too late I am off to Taiwan next month to get parts manufactured there.
not all single pivot bikes are the same! oranges are the best and they ride like nothing else, you look at the top ten in a NPS race and see how many are on 224s. have you even rode a 224 a patriot or a five?!
I raced a 224 for a season, struggled to get decent results on it. Did better the next year on my Sunday, back to where I would expect to be. Not racing this year (for obvious reasons for those who know me) so can't comment with results, not riding to shabby just now though on the same old Sunday :o) Last weekend top 225 was Hutch in 14th, not sure where the top 224 was. I think the Top 225 (now link activated) at Leogang was Thom Braithwaite in 26th, not sure, but did anyone race a 224 in the finals?
The reasoning for them skidding out obviously had nothing to do with trying to show boat for the camera, huh..... Each to there own, I like them great wee bikes.
When there is only one pivot point the shock works harder because it is directly affected by the terrain. When there are more pivot points, they help to alleviate some of the forces through displacement and allowing the shock to not have to directly absorb it all. More pivot points = a better feeling ride (in most cases). Why do you think all these bike companies continue to improve technology for multiple pivot point frames... it's not just a coincidence that single pivot frames are a dying breed.
They do it because then they can create hype about it and tell you it does all the wonderful things. Also sp arnt a sying breed, Notice this year that santa cruz and lapierre who both run linkage bike have now got single poivots out too.
That's actually not the reason manufacturers use mutiple pivots. Pivots do not absorb impact at all. All they do is manipulate the wheel path. All suspension systems are directly impacted by terrain. If you're talking about leverage ratios, that's not the case either. A shorter stroke shock will work harder than a longer stroke shock. Which means a multiple pivot bike like a v10 will work "harder" than a single pivot low leverage bike like a makulu. But that doesn't say one is better than the other. And as for single pivots being a dying breed... There actually seems to be a lot making their way onto the scene lately: morewood makulu, evil revolt, transition tr450, trek session 88...
maveri 20! what are you on about!!! single pivot bikes are the easyest to maintain as there are far less bearings and linkages to go wrong. they are simple and work well, FACT
it's simple physics, 1 point of pivot is going to have a lot more force applied to it than multiple pivots that spread the force between each point. there is also less brake jack, improved pedal efficiency, and less chain stretch with a multiple pivot frame than single. It might not be as responsive as a single pivot but for freeride/dh, it's the way to go. Single pivot is thrown around loosely, im speaking about only 1 moving point on the frame.
It is simple physics if you break it down. Take two 8" travel bikes with 3" stroke shocks, one single-pivot and the other a multi-link system. In order to go through the entire travel, the shock must be displaced 3", right? Given that all other factors are identical (other than the linkage), the amount of "work" on the shock is exactly the same. If you're talking about the force put upon the pivots, then yes, it is distributed throughout each of the links. However, that does not affect the shock whatsoever. If you want to talk about maintenance of each of the pivots, sure, there is less stress per pivot because it is distributed, but on a single pivot bike, you can usually make the pivot much bigger (and therefore more durable). It can also mean the difference of replacing 2 bearings vs. 6 or 8. Responsiveness has more to do with leverage ration rather than suspension design. And I would rather have my suspension be more responsive for FR/DH.
i see. well i learned something useful today. If single pivots work so well, why is the majority of frames multiple pivot? i'm still curious about that
Well, I think that would be personal preference and experience... but some of the more popular ones would be Morewood Makulu (my own biased opinion), Yeti 303RDH, Evil Revolt, Commencal Supreme, Trek Session 88 (or any of the treks, for that matter), Empire AP1, any of the Foes models...
so single pivot doesn't only pertain to one pivot point, it just means that it's pivoting in one direction versus a virtual pivot point which has more directions of pivot (v10)?
@Maveri20: That is correct. It means there is only one pivot between the frame and the rear axel. Any other linkages/pivots outside of that (such as rocker links, for example) just manipulate the leverage of the shock.
Manipulating the leverage ratios can affect the very essence of how the bike feels, including pedaling efficiency. Designers can tune it so the bike is very plush at the beginning of the stroke to soak up all the small bumps and make it ramp up at the end of the travel to prevent bottom out. Or make it very linear throughout. It can mean the difference between making a fast "plow-through-everything" bike (like the makulu) or something stiffer that pops better over jumps like the 303RDH - and yet both of these bikes are 8" single pivots.
A longer stroke lower leverage designed shock will do these things : They are more sensitive to bumps etc, as there is more stroke in the shock, they don't heat up as fast, which in return, makes them more consistent working for longer periods of time, they are capable of larger more violent impacts due to the amount of fluid in the shock (back to the heat element). These are the main reasons companies like Foes/Curnett do so well with the 2:1 leverage shocks. They are ultra consistent on gnarly runs... day in and day out. Maintainance is less being there is more oil, which generally allows for greater intervals btw services. Best thing to do to understand about shocks, is start researching off road shocks, pre runner shocks etc. That is generally the reason people like me run a WAY longer stroke shock on our trucks than were supposed to... they all around work better, for longer.
I find it funny that when he's talking about the tapered headtube, the fork setup they show doesn't actually have a tapered steer tube. Not very good editing.
More overpriced/overhyped single pivot? Haven't we suffered enough? I guess as long as people keep falling for it manufacturers will keep making money from it.
Steve Peat couldn't even win worlds on a single pivot...that's how poor the design is.
3:15 Danny looses the rear end and front, rear seems to be locked under braking, causing the front to go. This does not happen on my 6 point (I have an RP23 from an orange on her too for a harder tune), High rollers on too sop not like it is the tyres.. 3:49 Jo's back end does the same thing, something you just don't see to often on a multi pivot bike like the 6 point. Could be that they run their bikes super stiff because of the types or riders they are. I have pals with a 5's. They just don't cut it for my riding style (the same when I tried to switch to a 224 for Dh).
betsie, you must be joking. You cant tell that from the vid. He definatly slides out under braking, but he's doing mach 5 on loose gravel! Come back to earth please!!!
I hope I can tell what the suspension is doing from a video, it is easy, just watch it!
I know Danny, how he rides etc. Have know him since he was a wee boy.
As for loose gravel, Dannys crash is not on loose stuff.
At no point have I said that riding a single pivot bike makes you crash. Single pivots have tried to compensate for "brake jack" with brake arms, link activation, different pivot points etc. for many years. A pal of mine with a 223 comments how different the bike feels with the floating brake arm. My 224 was the same when I raced it also, the brake jack was horrible compared to the likes of my Sunday or Vp free before it. Not entirely a linkage thing though as the brake jack on the likes of an Empire (used for the bike test on here last year) is much less noticeable than on a 224. When I had an Mbuzi and my pals Orange Blood (both nice bikes) do not suffer from large amounts of brake jack and ride different to the 5 and 224.
Smike - Danny is on the brakes through the corner (probably because he is still injured and his injury will hamper him on the corners). General rule of cornering: Get your braking done before the corner, if you are on the brakes though the corner you have less grip than if you are off the brakes, and you are decelerating where you should be accelerating.
Its cool to see the video has created so much debate about single pivot design.
Betsie, just to Clarify a few things on the video. I filmed/edited this video and at the point where Danny crashed, that section of trail is actually barely even a corner, more of a drop on to a very loose camber. None of the riders would have been braking on it and I know Danny just got it a bit wrong. If it was down to anything other than a mistake it was due to him generally being used to riding sticky 2.5 High Rollers but deciding to run some lighter and less DH orientated tyres/wheels for this trip. I know Danny has been injured, however, if he was injured to the point it was holding him back on such a small part of trail I wouldn't film with him.
As you'll know if you guys are mates the main injury he has now is a huge gash on his arm from that crash (spent a day in hospital) so I hope he heals up quick!
ot all single pivot bikes work the same, and comparing a .224 DH bike to an AM bike in brake jack terms is like comparing a ford diesel's rear end to an f150's rear end by saying there is more flex in the driveline. 2 different products, 2 different types of frames.
rffr, I think you will find that different single pivots ride differently, many factors effect this. Pivot position, swing arm length, BB height, rear end stiffness......... I have ridden and timed on many different bikes (we just like to do that up here). Comparing a 223, 224, Sunday, Vp etc to each other is comparing apples to apples. Some best ever times from the past all on the same section of track and over the period of 18 months or so, same start, same finish, same rules. 38.44 (Sunday Coil/Vivid), 38.46 (Sunday Air/Dhx coil), 38.74 (VP Free) 39.16 (224). The track was at its fastest with the 224 and slowest with the Sunday/Vivid due to wear on the track (access track crossing became slower, due to cornering on the crossing).
I'm quite aware that they ride differently as I own a few single pivots myself, and have ridden dozens of them since full suspension has been around. From pro flex, to trek, to gt. They all have their ups and downs, but none of them can really be compared because like said, pivot position, swing arm length, bb height etc all effect it. None the less, you can't compare a dh single pivot design no matter on placement, bb, etc, because less travel ='s different leverage ratio which makes things like placement, bb, swing arm length all durastically change performance, even if it is pretty much identical to the DH in design. In the end all this is, is a leverage game.
Dh bikes range from 7" to over 10". Ben Reid has turned up to race Inners on a 6 point and given 98% of the field a lesson. Who were all on Dh bikes. It is not all the bike, but mostly the rider (sucks I know). Orange, like Morewood have a slack and more down orientated geometry to their bikes. As pointed out above by Dannys crash, it does not matter what bike you are on, if you have the wrong tyres on and make a mistake then the outcome is often inevitable.
What does that have to do with what we are talking about?
Why would a bike being single pivot have anything to do with a crash in the first place. It was a losing argument the minute it came up. (as we all know... suspension design aint gonna do squat for a crash unless a part fails... crashes happen from rider error... not because your on design A: bike or design B bike.
Seems like your getting a bit off track because there really isn't any argument here. Also, the examples your using seem so irrelevant to tho the topic of both A: his fall B: single pivot designs.
Also, don't see why you keep relating DH to the topic when this thread is not about a dh bike, nor is orange or mtb reviewing one.
Also, wrong type of tires is Irrelevant also. He wasn't on the "wrong" type of tires... he just wasn't on the tires he was used to (so I don't know how that seems "wrong" to you. Anyways, not trying to be a dick, just can't quite comprehend how someone could be so far off track with an argument. Almost "Liberalish" if you ask me. ANyways, no hate here I need to go ride me bike.
rffr, I am guessing that you have the experience to back up your comments......? As for getting off track, I was simply answering your comment containing your f150 comment, with evidence to dismiss your statement. I am not talking from thinking something, I am talking from knowing. If you have ridden much in the UK (guessing I have ridden a small amount more than you) then you will know what tyres and compounds, pressures etc. do when you are riding and how our terrain and grip levels differ from the likes of Whistler, Spain, France etc.
Again in your statement you are reading my words and changing them, I will repeat for you. At no point did I say the single pivot caused the crash, if you look at Stu Thomsons comment, Danny got it wrong and was not riding 2.5 ST HR's which he is used to.
I guess you have more riding experience than me, and spend more time setting your bikes up, have ridden, owned and timed on more bikes than me also chasing top spot at races.....
How do you know I haven't ridden much in Britain? I'm half British... to be specific, my fam lives in Derbyshire.
Funny your bringing experience into this when I didn't once "question how long you have been riding". My parents had me on my first bike at 3-4. been on bikes daily since. Owned many bikes. I am also a retro collector.
Simply put "compounds" is a lame ass excuse. I can throw any damn tire on my bike that is the same width and not eat crap from it. Point was... it was not aggressive enough of a tire. IE, not "compounds", but actual tread pattern. After all, compounds just allow a tire to perform a tad better in specific conditions, but that's it. Compounds don't make a tire a tire, the pattern does. Compounds are just gravy. Ever wonder before all this compound crap in the present day how riders were not falling due to tires having a generic compound?
Funnier still, is my Panaracer FR tires use compounds designed over 2 decades ago... but I don't fall. They are also dry tires, but yet I can ride rain, mud, dust, leaf covered trails on em and I don't fall. Point is, the pattern is what keeps me going, not the rubber the tire is made of.
Sorry betsie, but your first comment said "rear seems to be locked under braking, causing the front to go.". To me, i interpreted that as implying that the single pivot caused the crash. Am I wrong?
Smike - Never meant to imply anything about single pivots, hence why I did not once say single pivot. Just an observation about the video. My 224 did lock under braking, my Morewood did not, back in the day my Switch did. All single pivots.
rffr - you will not find any of the top riders over here racing on a 60a when they can race a ST for Dh on even a slightly damp track. As for Panny FR's you will not see anyone in the top 100 racing them.
Well if you were talking about scotland you should have said scotland and not the UK. IMO, the UK refers to Britain. I have never ever heard someone call scotland the UK.
I don't care if I see anyone top 100 racing them. See, that just proves you don't know what your talking about. You think that because something is not on the podium it means it's not good. Panaracer focuses on XC being they don't have the budget to focus out of that. You really need to look into the variables that play into sponsors at the world cup level because going by your consistent comments, you have the idea that something needs to be top ranked to be a decent part. Like said, what about white bros, canfied, bmw and the rest that aren't "top 100". Does that mean all that stuff is bad?
For someone older you sure do have a narrow view on things. Anyways, I can see this isn't going anywhere so I'm done commenting.
O, and if you blame a tire on crashing darkstar63, you should really focus on the fundamentals on riding. Entry level beginner classes are offered at most ski resorts, and they will go over the fundamentals of sitting on the bike, easy turning etc.
lol about Darkstar63 being wrong. Guess I need to do that too then :o) rffr, Glad I am so narrow minded. Shame I am a regular podium Dh racer and very good endurance XC rider (was sitting 2nd in my last solo enduro until I was taken out by a back marker on a technical descent). I don't push these things, but your comments go too far when you start throwing insults, I have the performances to back up what I say and many hours testing time...
What does you being on the podium have anything to do with parts not being bad parts just because they aren't on the podium. Also, just because you race, and get decent results, doesn't make you an authority to say what parts are horrible, especially when your reasoning is why didn't pro "a" win a world cup on bike "a" then type of an argument. If you had some actual real world technical information, or go into the physics on the subject to prove results I'd be all ears.
Btw, I was just teasing. If you could tell, I'm not calling you names, but the comment of "not knowing what your talking about" is generally a result of giving an argument and not providing logical reasoning for that argument. No, hate. I really don't care anymore. Topic is getting pretty redundant now.
Single pivot bikes have half the issues other bikes do. There is less points of failure, much LESS friction in suspension movement, as more bearings on multi link all add to friction. More bearings on multi link bikes means more bearings to go out, and need maintenance. Multi link bikes are generally more flexy than single pivot bikes due to more end points on the metal (each bolt adds a place of flex). In other words... it is actually more of a headache to go the multi pivot route. I have to say, outside of a select few multi link bikes like the canfields, I'm 100% single pivot now, and probably won't switch back.
Ever wonder why you rarely hear about single pivot peeps complaining about bad bearings, or needing replacement parts? They generally never do.
Also, companies like Tomac, with their new frames, have proven you can make one of the best riding bikes on the planet using only a single pivot design. Proven, reliable, and a great ride.
In other words... don't be afraid of single pivots. You won't be unhappy with the switch... but only if you get a decently designed single pivot (in which the Oranges have proven to be)
Well this Orange might speak to me if it's price gets well below the price of Blur LT2. If it was the price of SC Heckler, I wouldn't think twice. Right now Five is only slightly cheaper. Brits have some serious labour/manufacturing costs, they need more emigrants
There are also cons to look at single pivot bikes tho. Like others said, brake jack (but this in no way effects all frames and design), lack of plushness persay (you will see what I'm saying when you get on one). Single pivots will never have that bottomless plush feel a horst link etc will have. (Even comparing my old azonic frame, a giant faith, and my tomac, my tomac is the stiffest feeling linkage out of 3, even with a super light coil on the shock). It's a love/hate ordeal. Some people get off on that ultra plush ride of multi link, but some like something a bit more rigid that tracks pretty crazily well.
Definitely would never rule single pivots out. The "trendy" ones that dominate pink bike seem to be a plague. and hurt the simpler designs (everyone thinks stuff needs to be high tech to work well... in that case people need to put gear boxes on their bikes, and add every single possible thing they can think of too the frame to add to that cool factor
It almost seems like a pissing contest on who has the newest most expensive, most color matched, most technologically advanced bike[because we all know that vpp or fsr design is going to turn each of us into elite world cup racers. (makes me wonder how many guys on here actually have a family, or a girlfriend). Sad people have shed such a bad light on stuff that is pretty damn decent. I'm always pleasently surprised when I demo a single pivot that to me rides better than any of the multi link bikes on demo. Just reinforces the fact that sometimes simplicity is better for certain people. (hipsters need not apply... they can stick to their chick pants and fixies)
And single pivots vs linkage heheh. I rode cousins Heckler and it's super fun, different but superfun. This year I will ride it much more and this will make me decide. Only thing that Nomad does great it feels almost like DH bike in the bike park, still being able to ride trails well. This is when I am getting affraid of getting a single pivot trail bike. Can it do that too? Can it still feel like a FR bike a bit? It's all in the skills, but mine are average, and I'm too deep into job and family life to improve that significantly
And yes I serviced my Nomad twice already, didn't have issues with the bearings but still to even grease the axles I hade one thought in the back of my head while doing that: f**ck that sh*t! I want a f* single pivot
+Macaskill is fun to watch and he looks like an all around cool guy.
They didn't need to make changes in order to make the vid. Many people have never seen an in-depth look at orange bikes... so this is exactly what it was for. Less new product, more just looking into a good proven product the company has to offer.
Granted the SUNN Kern climbed like rabid weasel compared to the Alpine... but that can be replaced with more muscles.
But when i point Alpine downhill it is so much faster...
Personally i dont feel big pedal bob compared to the 4-link i had, there is noticeable pedal kickback when suspension compresses and extends but this does not bother me.
Also, do you really think it's the bike that puts these guys to the top? Man, you are so far off it's not even funny. Your 27 for god sakes... you should be ashamed of yourself.
It's the rider that wins races bro. Stop thinking bikes are the reason why people win world cups...
I bet you never realized, that companies like Santa Cruz have WAAAY bigger of a budget... which means they a : pay their pros more, b: provide their pros with almost everything they need, from nutritional / supplements, to weight training setups and workout gear and machines etc. So if anything, why people win on Santa Cruz, Specialized, Trek, Yeti etc is because of how much money they put into the pro they are sponsoring... which allows him to train harder, get stronger quicker, and be more consistent. The bike is the least changing in the variables of winning a cup. It's all about the support. I bet if you ask peaty... he would say he probably had a lot less of the support that he has now when he was on orange. Orange is a small company...
Canfield doesn't win world cups... does that mean the Canfield Jedi frames are bad? Avalanche doesn't win cups, does that mean the avy forks are bad? White brothers doesn't win cups... does that mean they are bad? I don't think you guys know how much it costs a company to support a top 3 ranked world champ. Probably more than most of you guys and your parents combined make in a year.
nothing neg about what I said
RP23's and DHX 5.0 Airs with their ProPedals help, a lot, shock tech has come long way past few years.
Did better the next year on my Sunday, back to where I would expect to be.
Not racing this year (for obvious reasons for those who know me) so can't comment with results, not riding to shabby just now though on the same old Sunday :o)
Last weekend top 225 was Hutch in 14th, not sure where the top 224 was.
I think the Top 225 (now link activated) at Leogang was Thom Braithwaite in 26th, not sure, but did anyone race a 224 in the finals?
Each to there own, I like them great wee bikes.
Steve Peat couldn't even win worlds on a single pivot...that's how poor the design is.
3:49 Jo's back end does the same thing, something you just don't see to often on a multi pivot bike like the 6 point. Could be that they run their bikes super stiff because of the types or riders they are.
I have pals with a 5's. They just don't cut it for my riding style (the same when I tried to switch to a 224 for Dh).
Single pivots have tried to compensate for "brake jack" with brake arms, link activation, different pivot points etc. for many years.
A pal of mine with a 223 comments how different the bike feels with the floating brake arm.
My 224 was the same when I raced it also, the brake jack was horrible compared to the likes of my Sunday or Vp free before it. Not entirely a linkage thing though as the brake jack on the likes of an Empire (used for the bike test on here last year) is much less noticeable than on a 224. When I had an Mbuzi and my pals Orange Blood (both nice bikes) do not suffer from large amounts of brake jack and ride different to the 5 and 224.
Smike - Danny is on the brakes through the corner (probably because he is still injured and his injury will hamper him on the corners). General rule of cornering: Get your braking done before the corner, if you are on the brakes though the corner you have less grip than if you are off the brakes, and you are decelerating where you should be accelerating.
Its cool to see the video has created so much debate about single pivot design.
Betsie, just to Clarify a few things on the video. I filmed/edited this video and at the point where Danny crashed, that section of trail is actually barely even a corner, more of a drop on to a very loose camber. None of the riders would have been braking on it and I know Danny just got it a bit wrong. If it was down to anything other than a mistake it was due to him generally being used to riding sticky 2.5 High Rollers but deciding to run some lighter and less DH orientated tyres/wheels for this trip. I know Danny has been injured, however, if he was injured to the point it was holding him back on such a small part of trail I wouldn't film with him.
As you'll know if you guys are mates the main injury he has now is a huge gash on his arm from that crash (spent a day in hospital) so I hope he heals up quick!
Thanks
Stu Thomson
I have ridden and timed on many different bikes (we just like to do that up here).
Comparing a 223, 224, Sunday, Vp etc to each other is comparing apples to apples.
Some best ever times from the past all on the same section of track and over the period of 18 months or so, same start, same finish, same rules. 38.44 (Sunday Coil/Vivid), 38.46 (Sunday Air/Dhx coil), 38.74 (VP Free) 39.16 (224). The track was at its fastest with the 224 and slowest with the Sunday/Vivid due to wear on the track (access track crossing became slower, due to cornering on the crossing).
Ben Reid has turned up to race Inners on a 6 point and given 98% of the field a lesson. Who were all on Dh bikes. It is not all the bike, but mostly the rider (sucks I know).
Orange, like Morewood have a slack and more down orientated geometry to their bikes.
As pointed out above by Dannys crash, it does not matter what bike you are on, if you have the wrong tyres on and make a mistake then the outcome is often inevitable.
Why would a bike being single pivot have anything to do with a crash in the first place. It was a losing argument the minute it came up. (as we all know... suspension design aint gonna do squat for a crash unless a part fails... crashes happen from rider error... not because your on design A: bike or design B bike.
Seems like your getting a bit off track because there really isn't any argument here. Also, the examples your using seem so irrelevant to tho the topic of both A: his fall B: single pivot designs.
Also, don't see why you keep relating DH to the topic when this thread is not about a dh bike, nor is orange or mtb reviewing one.
Also, wrong type of tires is Irrelevant also. He wasn't on the "wrong" type of tires... he just wasn't on the tires he was used to (so I don't know how that seems "wrong" to you. Anyways, not trying to be a dick, just can't quite comprehend how someone could be so far off track with an argument. Almost "Liberalish" if you ask me. ANyways, no hate here I need to go ride me bike.
As for getting off track, I was simply answering your comment containing your f150 comment, with evidence to dismiss your statement.
I am not talking from thinking something, I am talking from knowing.
If you have ridden much in the UK (guessing I have ridden a small amount more than you) then you will know what tyres and compounds, pressures etc. do when you are riding and how our terrain and grip levels differ from the likes of Whistler, Spain, France etc.
Again in your statement you are reading my words and changing them, I will repeat for you. At no point did I say the single pivot caused the crash, if you look at Stu Thomsons comment, Danny got it wrong and was not riding 2.5 ST HR's which he is used to.
I guess you have more riding experience than me, and spend more time setting your bikes up, have ridden, owned and timed on more bikes than me also chasing top spot at races.....
Funny your bringing experience into this when I didn't once "question how long you have been riding". My parents had me on my first bike at 3-4. been on bikes daily since. Owned many bikes. I am also a retro collector.
Simply put "compounds" is a lame ass excuse. I can throw any damn tire on my bike that is the same width and not eat crap from it. Point was... it was not aggressive enough of a tire. IE, not "compounds", but actual tread pattern. After all, compounds just allow a tire to perform a tad better in specific conditions, but that's it. Compounds don't make a tire a tire, the pattern does. Compounds are just gravy. Ever wonder before all this compound crap in the present day how riders were not falling due to tires having a generic compound?
Funnier still, is my Panaracer FR tires use compounds designed over 2 decades ago... but I don't fall. They are also dry tires, but yet I can ride rain, mud, dust, leaf covered trails on em and I don't fall. Point is, the pattern is what keeps me going, not the rubber the tire is made of.
My 224 did lock under braking, my Morewood did not, back in the day my Switch did. All single pivots.
rffr - you will not find any of the top riders over here racing on a 60a when they can race a ST for Dh on even a slightly damp track. As for Panny FR's you will not see anyone in the top 100 racing them.
Having family from Derbyshire means nothing compared to riding local trails and Dh race tracks in Scotland, especially northern Scotland.
Scotland: www.pinkbike.com/news/3-generations-video-2010.html
I don't care if I see anyone top 100 racing them. See, that just proves you don't know what your talking about. You think that because something is not on the podium it means it's not good. Panaracer focuses on XC being they don't have the budget to focus out of that. You really need to look into the variables that play into sponsors at the world cup level because going by your consistent comments, you have the idea that something needs to be top ranked to be a decent part. Like said, what about white bros, canfied, bmw and the rest that aren't "top 100". Does that mean all that stuff is bad?
For someone older you sure do have a narrow view on things. Anyways, I can see this isn't going anywhere so I'm done commenting.
O, and if you blame a tire on crashing darkstar63, you should really focus on the fundamentals on riding. Entry level beginner classes are offered at most ski resorts, and they will go over the fundamentals of sitting on the bike, easy turning etc.
Guess I need to do that too then :o)
rffr, Glad I am so narrow minded. Shame I am a regular podium Dh racer and very good endurance XC rider (was sitting 2nd in my last solo enduro until I was taken out by a back marker on a technical descent). I don't push these things, but your comments go too far when you start throwing insults, I have the performances to back up what I say and many hours testing time...
results I'd be all ears.
Btw, I was just teasing. If you could tell, I'm not calling you names, but the comment of "not knowing what your talking about" is generally a result of giving an argument and not providing logical reasoning for that argument. No, hate. I really don't care anymore. Topic is getting pretty redundant now.