Welcome to the 2021 Pinkbike State of the Sport Survey. This anonymous survey is designed to help shed light on key issues affecting the professional field and elite competition. We surveyed the best riders in the world to hear their thoughts, ideas, concerns, and criticisms on mountain biking in 2021. We invited any rider who had finished in the Top 40 overall of their chosen discipline in either of the previous two seasons in either XC, enduro, downhill, or slopestyle & freeride, as well as notable non-competition riders and highly ranked juniors. We then published them in full and publicly. To read the introduction to the survey click here, and to see all the other currently published SOTS articles click here.
We're taking a look at the data from each of the major disciplines surveyed and talking about some noteworthy or eye catching pieces of information. Now it’s enduro’s turn.
Enduro is still a comparatively young discipline, in that its professional ranks only formed with the inaugural Enduro World Series in 2013. The sport, in these eight years, has changed and I would imagine it will continue to evolve over the next eight. Some notable events include the partnership with the UCI in 2018, the addition of qualifying and EWS100 or EWS80 events, plus the implementation of the Trophy of Nations team racing and the E-EWS. As we roll into a decade of the EWS, it’s still evolving and growing.
Enduro Cohort Details
Number of Riders: 68
Downhill Riders Who Race EWS: 7
Men/Women: 40/28
Juniors: 11
Elite Race Winners: 7
Elite Top 5 Finishers: 21
Home Continent:
Africa - 0
Asia - 1
Europe - 41
North America - 16
Oceania - 10
South America - 0
Median Wage: 10,000 - 20,000 USD
The definition of enduro has steadily changed after a few seasons to both those inside the sport and on the sidelines. Gone are the days of the open face helmet strapped to a backpack, gone is the idea that these riders were any less talented or more risk-averse than their downhill counterparts, and gone is the notion that the EWS was gentle green pastures where downhill riders could come to ‘retire’. The sport has undergone a wave of rampant professionalism in merely a handful of years. So what’s the current state of enduro?
Of the enduro riders surveyed, everyone was from either Europe, Oceania, or North America, with one exception. Of those surveyed, 59% identified as male.
The results of these riders are very impressive. Of the elite field, nearly 11% had won an EWS, a further 35% have scored a career-high top five and an accumulative total of 68% have achieved a top 10.
There are some interesting differences between Enduro and Downhill rider pay.The breakdown of how much the riders are paid is
available to read in full. In today’s survey snapshot, we’re talking solely about enduro racing. We have the confidence of the riders to protect their anonymity and won’t do anything that could undermine that trust. For that reason, we’re not publishing a full breakdown of in-discipline earnings but I will pull out these statistics - of the riders who nominated enduro as their primary discipline, 24% earnt between 0 - 5,000 USD annually. If we exclude juniors, that falls to 18% in the $0 - 5,000 bracket, 9% in the $5,000 - 10,000 and 16% in the $10,000 - 20,000 bracket. What’s interesting is that, compared to downhill, the average wage is higher.
Nearly 50% of the elite EWS field surveyed make between $20,000 and $100,000 per year. Compare that with around 23% in the downhill.So you can forget green pastures of which to be put out to stud, for your mid-pack rider who is used to gravity-fed and technically demanding racing the EWS may well be more of the proverbial (comparative) cash cow. However, that’s not to say there isn’t real money to be made in the downhill, where 9% of elite riders surveyed earn over $100,000 per year. This compares to 5% in Enduro.
Riders Believe Races Shouldn’t Be Blind but Local Knowledge Carries an AdvantageThere was a time when enduro was almost synonymous with wing-it-wonders and hitting trails flat out having never so much as seen them before. There is still that style of racing out there, and racers can seek it if they wish, but the EWS has settled on a pattern of sighting the track before race day with allocated practice sessions. This is apparently very popular with riders. 75% of riders either disagree or strongly disagree that racing should be blind.
Enduro racing should be totally blind
Strongly Agree: 3 (4.3%)
Agree: 5 (7.1%)
Neutral: 9 (12.9%)
Disagree: 26 (37.1%)
Strongly Disagree: 27 (38.6%)
At the other end of the spectrum, compared to blind racing, is the rider who lives near the race venue. Often, they have a level of knowledge that is hard to come near to over a whole weekend of racing, let alone one practice run. More track time will almost always correlate with faster times. The problem of riders knowing the trails is something that the organisation does take seriously but if people have ridden all the trails in the area it puts the organizers in a difficult spot.
The vast majority of riders don’t wish for the racing to be blind, but there is a concern that hometown riders do have an advantage.
Many riding regions have their own distinctive traits and quirks. The shakedown day was introduced two years ago to help riders get a taste of the trails, without riding the race track, but to say there’s not a disparity between pre-event experience would be unfair and untrue.
I think, and it’s only my own conjecture, but the issue isn’t that the EWS likes to go to Whistler or Finale, it’s probably more that, as a racer, it might never even come to your continent, or within a day's drive of your hometown, where you can reap the rewards of your own local knowledge. Over 70% of riders surveyed agree or strongly agree that riders living near a race venue get an advantage.
I am concerned that riders who live nearer to a race venue get an advantage
Strongly Agree: 10 (14.3%)
Agree: 40 (57.1%)
Neutral: 11 (15.7%)
Disagree: 7 (10%)
Strongly Disagree: 2 (2.9%)
Going to new venues across the world not only has certain requirements in terms of infrastructure but it could be argued that racing in Europe is cheaper and more accessible for the majority of riders. Its seems to be about striking a fine balance between serving the traditional core of riders the venues that they can get to easily, as well as searching out the next big thing. In the open comments section, some riders voiced their approval for the EWS’ pattern of alternating Oceanian and South American rounds. Conversely, others argued that it's not right for so much of the racing of a World Series to happen on one continent.
Many Riders Feel that Penalties aren't Consistently AppliedOver 46% of rides either disagree or strongly disagree that penalties are consistently applied. It does open up the question of policing a sport that's celebrated for riders able to out for a full day's racing and often left to their own devices. I would imagine that a lot of these instances of perceived unfairness aren't as salacious as one might imagine, but that's not to say they're not important.
Penalties are fair and consistently applied
Strongly Agree: 2 (2.9%)
Agree: 20 (29%)
Neutral: 15 (21.7%)
Disagree: 24 (34.8%)
Strongly Disagree: 8 (11.6%)
It's relatively rare to hear of rider penalties, at least in the coverage of the event. This may well suggest that the lack of consistency applies to instances that we don't hear about, as much as the ones that we do.
Whether it's course cutting, doping, or something such as illegal shutting, riders need to be able to have faith in the integrity of the application of the sport's rules. In our open comment section, people referenced instances where riders went unpunished for illegal shuttling, as well as instances of riders potentially cutting the course.
Riders are Cautious after High-Profile Doping CasesEnduro has seen controversial cases in recent years. Doping regulation was stepped up with the partnership announcement of the UCI and EWS and since then some riders have been sanctioned for infringements. But, even though there is now a far greater structure to catch doping offenders, there seems to be a lack of trust from the riders. This might not necessarily mean that there are riders who are doping and not getting caught, but it could mean that the way the sanctions are applied isn’t felt to always be appropriate.
Pre-UCI involvement, a fan of the sport could often hear vague rumors of doping infringement or a rider successfully avoiding being caught. Those rumors, or the concern they created, can’t simply be removed in a year or two. It will take years to build up that trust. Currently, nearly 50% of riders are in some form of agreement that performance enhancing drugs are a problem in enduro racing.
Performance enhancing drugs are a problem in enduro racing
Strongly Agree: 2 (2.9%)
Agree: 32 (46.4%)
Neutral: 17 (24.6%)
Disagree: 16 (23.2%)
Strongly Disagree: 2 (2.9%)
Despite Doping Fears, Riders Overwhelmingly Think Racing is FairDespite some of the concerns from the riders, 80% are in some form of agreement that racing is fair and honest. It's comparable with other disciplines, and sits just behind downhill, which has 87.9% and ahead of XC, which has a 75%. Enduro riders, compared to XC athletes, are more suspicious of competitors using performance enhancing drugs, even if they trust the integrity of their race series more.
The racing is, in general, fair and honest
Strongly Agree: 6 (8.6%)
Agree: 50 (71.4%)
Neutral: 12 (17.1%)
Disagree: 2 (2.9%)
Strongly Disagree: 0
A Selection of Comments from the Riders | I would just like to see a more even playing field for privateers in terms of practice shuttles and team support. There is nothing worse than driving past someone pedaling up for practice stage, everyone should have to pedal as it is called "Enduro". |
 | It's not fair having 80-100 percent of the racing in Europe. The trails are very different all over the world and there are great riders everywhere that can't pay to go and race overseas. I think if racing was truly a World Series it would be split evenly and not heavily in Europe |
 | There are still some questionable lines being taken. Plus, shuttling stages in practice and not being punished is full bull****. |
 | I think the current system with the possibility to track walk and have one test run is fair. You will always have a local that will know more at one race but it levels out over a season. |
 | I think that the EWS is making an effort to make it as fair as possible but it's definitely not an easy task for them. |
 | With a lot more track and fewer marshalls than at a DH race, it's easier for riders to take shortcuts and I feel like there are many who are taking that chance. In my eyes, in the sport of enduro, it's a bigger benefit to have team support than it is in downhill. That's because training days are way bigger and the advantage of a private shuttling or a mechanic that is allowed to accompany you is way bigger than having your (private) pit setup nearer to the lift station than a privateer at a downhill race. |
 | Most of the time I'd say yes it is fair and honest but on quite a few occasions I have seen tape changes been made between practice and racing, as well as cut lines. (Tape the cut lines out). |
 | I have witnessed several cases where penalties were randomly not issued although clearly should have been. The information flow for teams and riders got a lot better but could still use some improvement and more involvement of teams to shape the future of our sport. |
 | There have certainly been instances when riders hang out and ride a venue for a couple of weeks long before the event or get some inside info as to what the course is going to be. They can then ride them a bunch in the months leading up to the event. |
 | The rules could be clearer and more specific to erase any grey areas and stop riders from pushing the limits of the rulebook. More consistent enforcement of the rules would also help. |
 | I’ve seen people take shortcuts and even have footage of some and it never got checked or penalties. They just get away with it. Plus there are factory riders with so much more support and it helps make their life so much easier. |
9 disagree
French riders... - 9
16 disagree
Us riders - 16
2 strongly disagree
Graves and rude has left the chat
I wonder if downhill was televised as much as football if it would share the same popularity. I think it would begin to after a couple of decades, but yeah that ain’t gonna happen!
Mtb needs that tv and investment from outside to be able to pay out to riders. Football players should do Dh for a day! Pinkbike make that happen??!!!!
Well that's not entirely true, is it? Fans' protests seemed to have played a major role in pulling clubs out of that ESL shit show.
On the financial side, of course fans, or to be more precise the sheer number of fans and their willingness to pay for stuff, matters a lot.
Richie Rude strongly disagrees: "no they work very well! "
Also, using Fort Bill as an example still I think it would be interesting to find out the results of Brits on that track against their average results across all the other tracks through the season.
I'm sure there's more examples of this across other disciplines like damn I race enduro and I know I've had some results that I've defeintely benefitted from knowing the track fairly well all be it living four hours away so by no means 'local' and I've had results where I've really wondered what went wrong when its a new venue to me but theres a lot of local riders that come on for one race of the series because its their 'local'
I guess this difference is less the higher up you go but maybe the margins are tighter? I don't know but its cool to nerd out on this rather than wheelbase, stack, anti squat blah for a change
Wait a minute..
Win on Sunday, sell on Monday...Unless you are an enduro rider. Win on Sunday, well, congrats but it will not translate into any sales. I am sure I will get down voted but the truth hurts.
I'd strongly disagree with that, it clearly means "I don't know" for a lot of respondents. Because they don't, that's the insidious thing about doping.
I'd suggest changing your interpretation of that one @henryquinney - it's at best misleading and at worst fake news.
Strongly Agree: 2 (2.9%)
Agree: 32 (46.4%)
"Nearly 50%". Is this misleading? Genuinely asking and not being facetious.
Stop complaining, race the e bike category, and shuttle yourself.