6D and Dynamic Research Win $500k Head Health Challenge III Prize

Sep 6, 2017
by Pinkbike Staff  
Over the last few years there has been a dramatic upturn in the number of helmets equipped with new technology that's designed to reduce the risk of a concussion and to deal with the rotational forces that occur during a crash. Not all of the new technology has been independently verified, but that's beginning to change as new testing protocols emerge.

We reviewed 6D's ATB-1T helmet in 2016, and since that time the company has continued to work on their Omni-Directional Suspension technology. They were recently awarded the Head Health Challenge's $500,000 grand prize for their efforts, after having their technology evaluated by the U.S. Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology. Read on for the full details in the press release below.




Press Release

With traumatic brain injury and concussions becoming a growing concern among amateur and professional athletes, the NFL and GE have collaborated with Under Armour and NIST and created the four-year, $60 million Head Health Initiative. Today, they announced awarding 6D Helmets and Dynamic Research the Head Health Challenge III’s $500,000 grand prize for their work with 6D’s proprietary Omni-Directional Suspension (ODS) technology.

“We’re thrilled to be named the winners of the Head Health Challenge III along with our project partners Dynamic Research Inc.,” said Bob Weber, CEO and co-founder of 6D Helmets LLC. “Together we worked to further develop Omni-Directional Suspension for application into multi-impact helmets. This award allows us to continue to refine our system for future helmet applications.”

Supported by the U.S. Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the National Football League (NFL), GE, and Under Armour, the Head Health Challenge III’s mission is to spur the discovery, design, and development of advanced materials to better absorb or mitigate forces within helmets, pads, and other products used by athletes, first responders, military personnel, and others who face potential head impact injuries.

“The goal of this challenge is to support innovation and help stimulate the marketplace with next-generation materials and design, and the impressive work by Dynamic Research and 6D Helmets has the potential to do just that,” said Jeff Miller, NFL executive vice president of Health and Safety Initiatives.

The Head Health Challenge III kicked off in early 2015 and attracted applications from more than 125 diverse companies and academic institutions. An independent panel of expert judges narrowed the list down to five finalists, and each were awarded $250,000 and a year of development time to enhance their materials while competing for the grand prize.


The Omni-Directional Suspension technology was originally developed by 6D beginning in 2011 and was sold commercially in its 2013 bicycle and motorcycle helmet lines. During the Head Health Challenge, 6D and Dynamic Research used advanced computer modeling, finite element analysis, and a series of iterative improvements to create a novel derivative of 6D’s ODS technology with an unusual geometric structure. The judges award decision was based on the new multi-impact material systems’ performance, potential commercial application and novel design. It reduced certain measures of impact by more than 70 percent when compared with baseline foam material commonly used in protective gear.
6D Helmet

“The Challenge allowed us to exercise material testing and analysis that further unlocked the potential of our ODS technology,” said Robert Reisinger, director of engineering and co-founder of 6D Helmets. “Over the course of the challenge, we gained a greater understanding of its capabilities by individually tuning for both linear and rotational forces to reduce brain injuring accelerations. Some of these new features are already supported in our latest product offerings.”

While testing ODS during the competition, 6D developed a more efficient and lighter version for use in its bicycle helmets. The company swiftly implemented the new design into its ATB-1T EVO Trail helmet, which has been available through its network of retail partners and specialty bike shops since March of this year.

6D
6D's Omni-Directional Suspension uses a rubber damper that sits between two layers of EPS foam.

NIST established a dedicated testing facility for the competition to provide a common measure of the materials’ performance. Each team submitted refined materials to NIST for testing at several points during the year, and NIST test data was provided back to them as feedback to modify their materials toward improved performance.

“The testing data collected by NIST researchers using this new measurement platform also helped the judges to fairly evaluate the diverse materials concepts developed by the finalists,” said Michael Fasolka, deputy director of the NIST Material Measurement Lab.

“I want to thank the NFL, GE, Under Armour, and NIST for sponsoring this challenge, and driving research,” concluded Weber. “The $500,00 grand prize, which we share with Dynamic Research, will allow us both, and the industry as a whole, to move further in a positive direction to improve helmet performance and brain protection.”

For more information about the GE-NFL Head Health Initiative and Head Health Challenges, visit PlaySmartPlaySafe.com.

For more information about 6D Helmets and its products, go to 6dhelmets.com.

Posted In:
Press Releases 6d


Author Info:
pinkbikeaudience avatar

Member since Jul 22, 2013
3,465 articles
Report
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

34 Comments
  • 32 0
 I like the fact that people are taking concussion research alot more seriously recently. Because look what happend in the NFL with CTE (Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy) making people go crazy from repetitive small brain impacts. Not to step on toes but you get 1 life and 1 brain so you don't want to end all of it in 1 crash. That is also why i dont care about buying a expensive helmet aslong as it is justified with protection. And big ups for the people who put this on (including the NFL after what they did before covering up CTE) it is a step forward in modern helmet design.
  • 11 0
 not just small brain impacts. i have been KO'ed around 12 times and suffer ridiculous short term memory loss, forgetting people names that i have known forever and several other issues as well. My kids will only were the latest and greatest in head protection. Very excited to see the improved tech as well!
  • 3 0
 Agreed. I don't know why we don't take protection in general more seriously in this sport.
  • 10 0
 Whenever I see anything head trauma related, I post this article done on a good friend of mine discussing his head injury and road to recovery. He’s a really good rider and though he’s had a lot of crashes he’s no idiot; quite the contrary he’s always taking calculated risks. We’re all susceptible. Any tech that helps in this area is needed and should be appreciated.

www.singletracks.com/blog/uncategorized/the-long-road-back-from-a-traumatic-brain-injury-part-1
  • 4 0
 thank you for posting that! I never realized the importance of healthy fats too in helping the brain.
  • 8 0
 Hell yeah, good work 6D! I have an ATB-1T, and it's great to have the piece of mind of the ODS keeping my brain as safe as possible.
  • 2 0
 I really liked how cool the 6D ATB-1T helmet looks on paper/computer screen. The safety ingenuity is so rad. I ended up ordering one, but returned it from annoying noise and looking awkward from being too big. Super cool looking helmet but not for me.
  • 6 1
 I love the fact that there's more and more thought going into all this. But isn't 6D helmet getting too thick by using that system? It Increases leverage of the rotational force acting on brain. I wonder if MIPS, Kali or some other system was in the competition as well. Just trying to get an idea of comparison range.
  • 4 0
 Bought two 6D helmets after I got a stage 3 concussion (wearing a 661 full face). Trust me, any amount of money is not worth going through that again.
  • 1 0
 Maybe do some give aways/raffles for the less fortunate guys/girls attempting to come up in the sport? I'd love to have a 6d helmet but paying 700$+ is way out of my rage I've had the same 200$ poc helmet for the past 3 years..
  • 7 4
 whenever someone asks if something has mips....... clearly this and the leatt turbine, and the kali ldl are better than a slipping liner.
  • 5 5
 He says without any data on any of the technologies
  • 4 1
 @j12j: Kali released some data on their LDL on pinkbike. www.pinkbike.com/news/rotational-concussions-and-ldl-real-world-data-kali-helmets-2017.html

MIPS seems to just release plots with no numbers on the axis, I don't trust plots without numbered axis.

So, right now, Kali and 6D seem to be the best choices based on data (albeit there is a small amount, but enough to show their claims are not baseless).
  • 2 0
 mips, in turn, is better than the padded styrofoam most helmets come with.

Safety technology in this sport is hilariously primitive, and very few companies post their testing methodologies. POC generally does.

IMO more companies need to start using the standards that motorcycle gear use (can't remember the name of the organization responsible for the standard). Their standards are not perfect, generally requiring a low standard of impact absorption, but it's better than nothing.
  • 2 0
 @j12j: I have done plenty of research, and I can use the data posted but as mentioned above they don't publish proper comparable data.

But hey, just try and shoot down my argument with your own lack of data.
  • 3 0
 Bought 6D trail helmet for my newbie girlfriend who is a brain researcher a few months ago. It seemed like the right choice to get the best for her.
  • 3 0
 Her brain sounds worth protecting.
  • 2 0
 Heard nothing but great things about 6D in the moto world. Hope they can fit that tech into a regular helmet!
  • 2 0
 So sick. Love my 6d's
  • 1 0
 Derp, peace of mind. I must have been listening to Iron Maiden recently.
  • 4 4
 I just wish they were affordable
  • 7 0
 Bikes = Not Affordable
Kick the Can = Affordable
  • 2 1
 @nordicMT: Buying used bikes is very affordable with the right deal. I just can't justify $500+ for a full face and $250+ for a regular helmet when I can buy something that will more than likely do pretty much the same job for less than half that. Two helmets and thats half my bike. Great tech, just wish everyone could afford it.
  • 1 0
 If only....https://www.pinkbike.com/buysell/2241129/
  • 1 0
 @m-t-g:
now we're talkin!
  • 1 1
 @jdsusmc: The Kali stuff has a crash replacement program at least, they'll straight up replace the helmet for free. Otherwise, the price tag is tough to handle.
  • 4 0
 Get a concussion and you'll wished you justified spending 500 on a full face. I'd pay a thousand for one if it protects this brain. The thing with accidents is you always regret shit in retrospect. I concussed/broke my nose a couple years ago. Concussions are a lot scarier then I thought, esp with the recent research into them.
  • 1 1
 This prize money they could:
a) use to offset costs of R&D and production making the product more affordable,
b) book as a windfall profit.
  • 2 0
 @jdsusmc: In the moto world we have a saying - if you can't afford proper protective gear, you can't afford to ride.

You can get a basic Jap bike for $2k if you want, whereas good gear can easily run you $1.5k. Most people settle for the Cycle Gear generic brand stuff and say more or less what you just said. Then they crash and have their tendons ablated off, leaving more meat on the highway than your average road kill.

If you think for a minute about how bad it would be to lose a knee or a pint of blood, even with a low chance of happening it's worth a large sum to avoid.
  • 3 0
 @jdsusmc: This is cutting edge stuff that costs money to develop. It will become affordable eventually. It would never become a viable product without this step in the process.
  • 4 0
 @anchoricex: Concussions are terrifying. Can't even think or concentrate without pain, plus the added secondary impacts on working memory.

$250? #worthit
  • 2 0
 @jdsusmc: not at all saying your "cheap" helmet is inadequate but as a 40 yr old father of 2 who's still a regular visitor of the ol' ER, I must say that no cost on protection gear is to great if you consider the actual costs involved with being hurt. Not just the bills, but time, etc.
  • 1 0
 @nordicMT: Cutting edge? I like your sarcasm.







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.054010
Mobile Version of Website