TESTED
Norco
Range Killer B-2
WORDS Mike Levy
PHOTOS Mike Kazimer
While there is still much debate among consumers as to just how far the 650B wheel craze is going to go, Norco left no one guessing about their thoughts on the 'tweener wheel by offering six different 650B models for 2013, with the 160mm travel Range Killer B platform consisting of three of those models. Intended as a machine that can not only get you way out there during an all day epic, but also throw down when the time comes, the Range lineup features plenty of standover height, a removable splined ISCG-05 chain guide adapter, and meaty tires that give you a hint as to what the bike is capable of. The $3838 USD B-2 model tested here is spec'd with FOX's air sprung Float CTD suspension, a 2x10 drivetrain, and Avid's Elixir 5 brakes, making for a total weight of 31.6lb.
Range Killer B-2 Details
• Intended use: all-mountain
• Rear wheel travel: 160mm/6.3''
• 650B wheels
• Aluminum frame
• Tapered head tube
• 'A.R.T' Horst Link suspension
• 12 x 142mm Syntace axle
• Weight: 31.6lb
• MSRP $3838 USD
Range Killer B Construction DetailsThe curvy looking Range, with its black and blue colour matched components, instantly won over anyone who laid eyes on it in person, but there are a lot of details that require a closer look in order to spot. The hydroformed tubes change shape depending on what is needed of them, with large flares at the end of the top and down tubes where they come together at the tapered head tube, and a drastically sloping top tube that should make room for even the shortest of riders. Cable routing isn't as sleek as we've seen on some other bikes, and there is no concession for internal routing, but Norco has built in guides for a dropper post along the seat tube and underside of the down tube. It seems many companies are moving to a removable (
and replaceable) ISCG-05 adapter plate that fits onto splines around the bottom bracket shell, Norco included, and the bike's X7 front derailleur is mounted directly to a stub protruding from the bike's seat tube.
Like many other bikes, you'll find clevis-style captured pivots at the end of the chain stays, but Norco is going about it a bit differently by actually machining the female end of the clevis section directly into the end of the tube rather than welding it on. This not only removes two welds from the bike, one on each side, but also goes a long way to ensuring perfect alignment.
Gravity TuneNorco has, not surprisingly, gone with a 12x142mm rear axle for the back of the Range, but they are also doing something different with the rear of their bikes that most other companies aren't: size specific rear-center lengths that get longer or shorter depending on the frame size. The very large majority of frames utilize the same rear-center length regardless of frame size, meaning that a size small, with its much shorter front-center length, might use the same back end as its size large counterpart. Norco says, and we would have to agree with them, that this can have a very unbalancing effect on how the bike handles. Taking a look at the Range's geometry numbers reveals that the bike's rear-center length grows from 419mm to 436mm as it goes from extra-small to extra-large sizing, with our medium test bike using a 427mm length. While the change in rear-center lengths in Norco's Gravity Tune has often mistakenly been identified as being due to different chain stay units, it can actually be traced down to the bike's bottom bracket forging. ''
The bottom bracket forging within the front triangle differs in that we move the bottom bracket forward and back in relation to the lower main pivot. This makes for a variable chain stay length without manufacturing five different chain stays,'' Norco's Dustan Sept explained to us.
A.R.T Suspension Explained
The 160mm travel Range utilizes a Horst Link suspension layout that Norco has dubbed 'A.R.T.', which is short for Advanced Ride Technology. While the same acronym is used on both their longer travel Aurum downhill race bike and the shorter legged Sight, Norco says that their A.R.T. design is more than a single suspension platform, A.R.T. is a system that we optimize for each intended use.'' According to Norco, that means an enhanced rearward axle path for the DH bike, while the pedalling efficiency of their more cross-country focused A.R.T. bikes has been optimized. The mid-travel Range sits between those two, with Norco tuning it to have a slightly more rearward axle path than what is found on many other Horst Link designs in an effort to have the bike carry momentum well on rough terrain. The bike's rearward axle path can also be used to tune in a certain amount of anti-squat by way of chain tension, something that Norco says they have used to improve the Range's climbing abilities.
A sturdy looking, one-piece welded rocker link is used to activate the shock. Both the main and the rocker link pivots utilize an interesting hardware arrangement that has been designed to take point loading off of the sealed bearings to increase pivot life. A split,
expanding collet is used up against each bearing's inner race, with the pivot axle then pushed through the collets (
usually it would simply be the axle up against the bearings). As the pivot is tightened, the collets expand and exert even pressure on the inner bearing race. Contrast this to a standard pivot axle that must fit loose enough to be pushed through the bearings, which then allows it to rock ever so slightly and apply a concentrated load to one specific spot on the bearing.
Specifications
|
Release Date
|
2013 |
|
Price
|
$3838 |
|
Travel |
160 |
|
Rear Shock |
FOX Float CTD BV SV |
|
Fork |
FOX 34 TALAS 650B CTD |
|
Headset |
FSA |
|
Cassette |
PG 1030 11-36 T cassette 10 speed |
|
Crankarms |
Race Face Evolve crank 2x10 24/36 |
|
Chainguide |
Sram MRP 2X X-Guide |
|
Rear Derailleur |
Sram X9 Type 2 10 speed |
|
Chain |
Sram PC-1030 |
|
Front Derailleur |
Sram X7 10 speed |
|
Shifter Pods |
Sram X7 |
|
Handlebar |
Norco alloy 25 mm rise bar x 740 mm width |
|
Stem |
Norco trail / AM stem |
|
Grips |
Ergon GA1 EVO |
|
Brakes |
Avid Elixer 5 |
|
Hubs |
Formula |
|
Spokes |
DT Swiss Champion |
|
Rim |
Sun Inferno 27 650B |
|
Tires |
Schwalbe Hans Dampf 650B x 2.35 folding |
|
Seat |
Norco design FR / AM saddle |
|
Seatpost |
Norco Lite 2014 alloy double bolt seatpost 30.9 |
|
| |
| The bike's willingness to be placed on the trail wherever the rider deems fit is a huge boon to its abilities, and it really does punch above its weight in this regard. |
Climbing/acceleration: Weighing in at over 30 pounds and sporting 160mm of travel, the black and blue Norco is never going to scamper up climbs like a lighter bike with less travel or larger diameter wheels but, keeping all things relative, the bike does well when it comes time to gain some elevation. This is especially true on technical terrain, be it loose or wet dirt, or a climb covered in a spiderweb of roots, with the grabby Hans Dampf tires seeming to get a handhold on everything. As with the very large majority of bikes in this travel bracket, the Range benefits from flipping the pedal-assist lever on its FOX Float CTD shock when the time comes to really put any power down, and this was especially true on steep climbs that necessitated dropping down into the smaller 24 tooth chain ring - the suspension tended to want to activate otherwise. Conversely, pedalling performance in the big ring was impressive, with little to no movement in a larger gear, a fact that should be noted by riders who plan to fit their Range with a single chain ring. Interestingly, we didn't make use of the FOX 34's TALAS dial as much as we first thought we would, with the Range moving surprisingly well on tight terrain with it at full extension, although running the fork's CTD dial in the 'Trail' setting added a lot of "get up and go" to the ride when it came time to dig deep.
Given that many of our rides begin with a solid 3,000ft climb as a minimum, we weren't anticipating too much excitement on our end about the Range. We were happily surprised to discover that Norco has created a mid-travel bike that, although far from being light, can more than hold its own on big days in the saddle that include some monster sized climbs. If possible, keep the chain on the large chain ring and chug your way up - you'll likely be as surprised as we were by how well the Range performs.
Technical riding: Ask the Range to do something and it very likely will oblige, with an easy going personality that doesn't seem to require a certain riding technique to bring out its best qualities. Want to take that inside line and pop over that rock? Sure, why not? Ultra tight, uphill switchbacks that might make other 160mm travel bikes pause? There is a very good chance that the Range will tractor its way through without much fuss or fumbling. The bike's willingness to be placed on the trail wherever the rider deems fit is a huge boon to its abilities, and it really does punch above its weight in this regard. One of our main test loops features multiple heinously steep uphill pitches that force our pace to hover close to stalling speeds, all on lines that require pinpoint precision to be successful on, and the Range, with its 66.5° head angle, proved that a bike is more than its numbers would have you believe by making short work of it each and every time we came through. Colour us impressed.
Downhill: With 160mm of travel and relatively relaxed handling, it comes as no surprise that the Range likes to get after it as the terrain begins to tilt downwards. This is one of those bikes that, as far as geometry is concerned, simply offers that sensation of feeling at home on, even during the first proper ride. The front of the bike can be brought up at will, a great quality when it comes to adding some fun to the ride, and the 427mm chain stays make for a snappy rear end that can be whipped around as needed. All told, the Range rides like a lighter weight, 140mm travel bike in a lot of situations, which is a personality that many bikes strive for but few attain. While the bike's handling shines in many places, its 'Evolution' level FOX 34 TALAS CTD fork can feel overwhelmed on fast, successive impacts. This means that choosing to plow through any chunder can result in the fork seeming to lose its place in its travel, with an undamped feel to the stroke that highlights the performance differences between it and their higher-end FIT cartridge equipped FOX forks - the disclaimer being you'll likely be happy with the Range's 34 TALAS CTD fork if you haven't spend a lot of time on anything that uses a more sophisticated damper, and that given the bike's $3838 USD price tag, performance is well within expectations.
Riding the Range at the edge of our comfort zone was a pleasure, with the traction available in spades thanks to the grippy Hans Dampf tires and supple rear suspension. The pint sized FOX Float CTD shock, when set to full open, allowed the bike to track incredibly well. This was especially noticeable on small trail chatter that might be just enough to cause a loss of traction, or when the trail is slick after a rain fall, and there felt to be enough ramp-up to prevent any major bottoming moments when running 30% sag. It might be down to the Range's built-in liveliness, but we didn't often feel the need to firm up the shock via its CTD switch - the bike has plenty of life to it on the downhills without needing to take away from its excellent suspension abilities. A downhill bike it is not, but the 160mm travel Range is a potent machine in the right hands.
Component Report: •
Schwalbe Hans Dampf tires: Good - the 650B 'Dampfs on our Range mean that we've now ridden them in every diameter that Schwalbe offers, with the mid-size offering up the same predictable traction when it comes to cornering, braking, and climbing. They might not roll as fast as a tire with a less aggressive tread pattern, but they stick to most trail surfaces like Velcro. Bad - three flats, all pinches, in the first five days on the bike, had us riding on our tiptoes. The "tubeless ready" Schwalbe tires come from Norco with tubes installed (
the sealant would likely dry out while the bike sits in your local shop) but you'll be doing yourself a favor by converting them over before hitting the dirt.
•
Truvativ X-Guide: Good - we didn't suffer from any dropped chains during the test. Bad - the plastic shroud for the X-Guide's lower roller cracked from its attachment bolt outward, likely from us snugging it up a bit too tight. This is admittedly our mistake, and also the first time we've seen one break in this way, but it happened a bit too easy for our liking.
•
That missing dropper post: Good - the bike is less expensive than if it came stock with one. Bad - most riders will want to add one to the bike before it leaves the shop or soon after. Deciding on a bike's spec can't be an easy job, with a product manager having to juggle performance and consumer expectations with one hand tied behind their back when it comes to cost. Should a 160mm travel, $3838 USD bike come stock with a dropper post? We think so, even if it means a downgrade somewhere else on the bike or an increase in price. There is a good chance the eventual owner will pony up for one anyways.
•
Ergon GA1 EVO grips: Good - ummmm? Bad - While their odd shape turned out to actually be fine, their large outer locking collars were very noticeable as they made contact with the outer edge of our hands. We'd swap these out before leaving the shop.
•
Hardware issues: The bike's derailleur hanger comes in contact with the back of the SRAM X9 derailleur's knuckle, preventing it from rotating far enough rearward for the wheel to drop out easily once the axle has been removed. This is a strange detail, and the wheel requires a good push to remove it from the dropouts. The bike's ironically named '360 Lock' suspension hardware also began to make some very interesting noises after less than ten solid rides, requiring a quick bolt check to re-torque each one in order to quiet the Range.
•
Race Face Evolve crank: Good - they might not be as sexy as some other options out there, but the reasonably priced Evolve arms work well, with the fast-shifting Turbine rings helping their cause.
Pinkbike's take: | The Range is an easy bike to get along with, one that all sorts of different types of riders will be able to enjoy. That, in our mind, is what a proper 160mm travel bike is all about - an aggressive rider will feel confident enough to not be held back, while a more timid rider will feel comfortable enough to push themselves to new heights. Norco's Range Killer B-2 manages to do just that by offering a forgiving ride, but without taking away that dynamic temperament that so often gets muted on bikes in the same category.- Mike Levy |
www.norco.com
www.fahrrad-xxl.de/shop/carver-icb-01
Not this griping again.
You fuss and whine when they review a 10k bike and say that's too much, then they review THIS one, and it's only $3800, and you all S-T-I-L-L get your friggin' knickers in a twist!
If you can't afford to "swing a big stick" in the wallet department, get an education, get a better job, make more money, and QQ.
Otherwise, the whining's getting OLD, folks!
Designed "in house" by one guy on a computer... versus as with Norco or Rocky Mountain designed in house by a bunch of guys, on computers and with actual prototypes they make themselves in-house, and then production is finally handled by overseas frame builders. They also have dealer networks and wide distribution channels all over the world. Few outside of Europe have heard of YT Industries, and if you break something more complicated than a derailleur hanger, you can't just stroll into a local shop for quick and easy service or spare parts sourcing. If I need pivots for a Norco, even a ten year old VPS, I can go into any bike store than deals them, or has an account with their parts distribution side, and order the pieces in a matter of days. I doubt YT will be around in ten years time, and thus the deep discount price of a new bike is justified.
There are people on mtbr and rbr who have for years organised "group" frame buys and gone factory direct with multiple design changes and arrived at something from scratch that had "community" input. Its nothing particularly special that YT has done. Its only idiots who don't know the bike industry very well like yourself who think that somehow their shit smells like roses all the time. Some buddies of mine started their own bike brand a few years ago called Steelwool (and they HAVE been reviewed by Dirt Rag) and they ordered several prototypes from a Taiwan factory, did some testing, had changes made, and then ordered a production run of frames. The unit cost, when you order a hundred framesets, for a nice quality chromoly touring/cross bike frameset (or mountain hardtail) is about $80USD each. These are things at the consumer retail level in independent dealers that sell for $600-800 range.
www.evanscycles.com/products/norco/range-killer-b-2-2013-650b-mountain-bike-ec041226
over this
www.canyon.com/_en/mountainbikes/bike.html?b=3049 especially when you consider that once you add the essential dropper post to the norco they cost near enough the same??
Lets set a few things straight:
YT Industries design their own frames. I OWN the 2013 TUES 2.0 ltd. World Cup edition and know it by first hand experience. There is nothing on the market that resemble that frame - unless you count the compatibility with standard components (seatposts, cranks, headsets, ie.) that EVERY manufacturer uses for their complete bikes.
YT's bikes have been reviewed plenty of times in EUROPEAN magazines. They don't sell to Canada nor America, so name just one good reason to spend time and money on having their bikes reviewed by the magazines, who primarily cater to customers in these regions?
Retail price for the BOS RaRe fork and shock plus the SRAM X0 derailleur is what I paid for THE COMPLETE BIKE. You have to be more than just lightly retarded not to recognize that as a bargain. What I think you Canadians and Americans forget is, that usually we in Europe have to pay a lot more for the bikes supposedly made by brands in your part of the world.
Take the DEMO 8 FSR II for example. In Denmark it retails for $7166 vs. the $3748 I paid for the much, much, much better equipped YT. There is just no getting around that at this point, medium sized companies like YT are giving the giants a serious f*ucking beating!
/rant over.
I'm thinking really, how many people actually spend more than 2K $ on a bike nowadays. There are a lot of options in that price range, why not pick such a model once in a while ?
You guys have no clue what you are talking about. What YT does is not differnent than Norco or any other company producing frames in taiwan/china. Just a simple google search or looking it up on their site would have told you that. The tues had a predecessor also developed inhouse and they used it as a basis for the new model. WITH PROTOTYPES being tested at Whistler, Pietermaritzburg and other races. Yes maybe Specialized and a few other companies may have bigger r&d budgets but what they do is basically the same: design inhouse and source out production to china. They only have a bigger margin and add one through the lbs.
KHS used a re-branded Astro-frame emerging in various incarnations from other companies and sold by astro direct in south-america: www.astroeng.com.tw/products_info.php?kind=1&series=6&id=38
That means Astro designed this frame, not KHS. Which isn't a bad thing necessarily but this guy developed the Yt frames in germany:
fstatic1.mtb-news.de/f/ii/o8/iio8to4me36o/large_YT_17.jpg?0
As to whining about prices... if you're going to keep comparing apples and oranges, please do so in a fruit stand, not here. Because 2400 euro is a deal for Europeans where the entire continent is rather small (face facts... the USA alone is bigger than all of western Europe combined in terms of physical size) so shipping a bike from Germany to the UK isn't anymore expensive than shipping from NYC to LA. But if you tried shipping one of those YT's to the USA... where the $3800USD price tag for the Norco is what you're comparing to, that 2400 euro bike price (which is about $3200USD) quickly becomes even money when there's an ocean involved.
Once R&D is done, and tooling is paid for, unless a brand has some sort of exclusivity agreement with a factory that the tooling won't be used to product copies for any other brands... there's nothing to stop the factories from re-selling it onwards themselves later, and many factories do just that. Hell even Fox suspension does that. They develop something "unique" for one brand, and there's a couple year exclusive deal with that company that guarantees the features won't show up on other brand bikes, but when the agreement ends, you see the stuff elsewhere.
unlike by blur ltc which cost me £120 for a "pro pack" because 1 pivot axle seized and stripped.
As to why they picked a $3800USD bike... they didn't. Well other than which bike that was given to them for free to assign to testing by this guy next... that's the only "picking" that went on. Pinkbike doesn't own what they review. They're given it. When the test is over, they give it back.
@jhou, i did and they don't, the UK importers wouldn't even sell me the 1 pivot axle i needed they insisted i had to buy the full pack.
Well the KHS/Astro-frame got sold from various other companies for years now and the carbon sucessor which is available on the astro-site already while not one of the YT-frames got sold under another label. So much for your theories.
Why shouldn't Yt develop their frame inhouse but claim it on their site and various other ocassions and get a Reddot-design award for the Tues?
Because they sell affordable bikes?
You just seem to have no clue of the german direct-sales bike-market. Why would canyon buy a CT scanner if they just bought their frames in taiwan?
Lolwhut. Bearings are bearings. Who the hell designs a bike around proprietary bearings when you can buy a bunch of 8x20x10 off the shelf or whatever size you need.
Racers are happy to pay big money for every tiny performance advantage, and because of them a fifteen year old student can buy almost the same frame with quality Deore or Zee components for a great price. We have NEVER had it better than this, yet everyone complains.
P.S. IF YOU WANT A YT GO BUY ONE! This is a review of a Norco. In Australia they won't even send me a YT, let alone a derailer hanger when mine breaks.
LOW COST MY A$$ (not literally ha)!!
The weight with the dropper is going to be around 32lbs. And this is where the 650B is going to have its biggest challenge: extra weight.
I think that Norco chose wisely in designing this bike to be easy to ride, sturdy and priced very competitively( I believe there is a less expensive model than the one tested here.)
When can we see an all-mountain all-wheel size shoot out?
I've had the same experience w/ every MRP guide I've ever tried and the article said it best, "This is admittedly our mistake...but it happened a bit too easy for our liking."
www.vitalmtb.com/product/guide/Chainguides,18/MRP/G3,12146#product-reviews/1193
The Norco looks nice, but for value for money Giant Reign 1 wins hands down, I paid over a grand less for similar suspension, with SLX brakes, cranks and drivetrain, and it comes with a dropper, and although I had some initial problems with the dropper with cable rub on the upper link, a little re-routing and warrantied the cable, and it's sorted now.
I don't know how PB gave those tires a good review though... like riding on ball bearings in my opinion.
This is purely anecdotal but... my previous girlfriend had NO off-road experience to speak of. I built her essentially a 28er using an early 90s specialized crossroads hybrid (back then, hybrids were actually flat bar 700C monster crossover bikes not the upright riding road-like commuter bikes they are today) with merely an update to the tires really, using Bontrager Jones XR 29 x 1.8 (that's the label size) which inflated were really about 28.3" diameter.
forums.mtbr.com/vintage-retro-classic/29er-1991-way-396091.html
That's the resulting bike, and she basically has convinced herself after spending a lot of time on that, versus a few rides on some suspension fork equipped 26ers, that suspension is useless and that she's faster on her bike than she would be on anything with smaller wheels, over roots and small rocks and bumps. My current girlfriend has a 26er and a 29er hardtail, and spends pretty much all her time on the 29er when offroad now. But has also said IF she gets another bike, she'd like to try a 650B as a full suspension, since she hasn't ridden a full suspension yet off-road on any actual trail rides.
I've been riding the trail for 17 years and I almost never get over that section without having to stop and dab my feet on 26ers, but on 29ers I sail over it with little effort involved other than making sure I execute the turn, otherwise its riding over thorn bushes as a risk, and tubeless sealant or not, I prefer NOT to put holes in my tire casings. With 650Bs I still clear it, though perhaps not as smoothly as on the 29er, but I don't have to concentrate as much on the turn part either.
I ´ve had the opportunity of riding bikes of all 3 brands, and even "low cost" Carver, and they are all superb quality bikes. These 3 bayerische brands, are doing things differently than the standard industry and I find it awesome, I like their bikes a lot. I like them so much I am getting my hardtail, and road & tri bike from Cube, while I have been toying with the idea of a Canyon Strive or YT Wicked to replace my trusty Giant Reign (which I still find an awesome bike), and the YT Tues is definitely in my list for new DH bikes, although there are so many DH bikes I like out there (including the Aurum), I am messed up, =P
As for the Norco, well it´s a Norco! Great bikes no doubt about it and they finally upped their games with good looking, fun bikes! Thumbs up Norco, the Sight is in my new bike radar!
As an owner of this bike (but with a custom build), I can confirm that this statement is very true! It is the liveliest bike I've ever ridden by a long shot. I go downhilling with it and it handles everything just fine. The next day, I'll go cross country riding while still having a blast. I'll be impressed when the day comes that I ride a funner and livelier bike that is just as versatile.
It is fairly expensive compared to some other offerings on the market, but the smile that it'll put on your face is priceless.
@IronCross: I agree with you 100% about calling this bike "budget"...Not only that, if I was paying retail I'd WAY rather not have to deal with the garbage that is the Fox 34. The Range 3 is the hidden Gem of the Range line IMO as it's less then most "premium" companies frame only options (and Norco's got a better frame/suspension then 99.9% of the companies out there) as a complete. I spent the weekend ripping a Range 3 up and down the Glade Trail on Mt. hood (several miles of NW DH/FR tral with some brutal climbs in the middle of it all) and after the dust had settled, I'd blown the doors off of guys on significantly more expensive "premium" frames. The only thing that could hold a candle to the Range was a Specialized Enduro. I can say with a LOT of confidence (I've been Demoing bikes for the last year looking for "the" frame for me) that the Norco and the Seciaized should be at the top of anyone's list who's looking for a bike that can be pedaled to the top in search of the perfect descent. Other bikes pedal UP slightly better, but nothing I've ridden (SB66, Trek Slash and Trans. Covert to name a few) does the down nearly as well. I loved the Transition Covert (makes sense as it's another "NW Style" bike), but the Range was hands down the better descender and easily it's equal on the ups.
my canyon strive size Large weight 31.2 with reverb and pedals + is a lot cheaper..
Another bike where TALAS and CTD are not needed. A FIT 34 Float would do better on this bike...
The new Santa Cruz Heckler 650B for 2600$ is keeping it closer to honestly!
Anyway that asymetry may well also go as bikes progressively get designed for a single chain ring up front and accomodation for the front derailleur is no longer a concern.
And the gearbox bike will be only a virtual one
I think we can answer all three of them with a "No".
......
.....
Or would you be happier if to avoid NEW product reviews PB just re-reviewed 2011 and 2012 product in new colors?
I think we can answer all three of them with a "No"
Bike magazine even named it an editors choice bike.
BTW: whatever happened to 29ers?
The Norco Sight and Range models replaced 26er options last year with 650B this year, and next year they're adding Fluid series models as well with less travel (and less price). Rocky Mountain scratched off the 26er and 29er versions of the Altitude to go JUST to 650B with the model, but at the same time they brought in the longer-travel Instinct series for 29ers (which is also a new for 2013 design). It will be interesting to see if next year they eliminate the 26er Elements, or change the model names around so that Elements are one wheel size only and they bring in another classic model name for the other wheel size.
I don't want to hear no disrespect
Lets get along.
www.pinkbike.com/news/Norco-Sight-Carbon-Sea-Otter-2013.html
www.sicklines.com/2013/04/19/jill-kintners-sea-otter-downhill-bike-norco-sight-27-5-carbon-prototype
If you mean "rebuild", a good fork rebuild should take 30-45 minutes anyway if you're thorough.
And yeah, the entire conversation here has been about posts. Pretty safe to assume that's the direction the conversation will continue.