I think the main reason they dont is because it costs thousands of dollars to make molds and manufacturing tools for each model of frame and the output isnt that great on FS slope/jump bikes. Basically they wouldn't make a lot of money off of it to be worth it for trek.
I think Specialized is about to prove that there is a market for slopestyle bikes. I also think that might have been the best damn commercial i have ever seen, i could totally see myself buying one in a moment of weakness.
The people that wouldn't buy a Trek slope bike are the same people that didn't buy a Trek Ticket which is now discontinued due to lack of sales. Would they be better? Yes. Would they be more expensive? Yes. Notice slope bikes always have the most simplistic suspension designs so they can make it affordable enough for people and they will still probably sell for 50% off the original price. Same reason why most people buy dirt jump bikes second hand and why most shops no longer stock them. The customers dictate the market and if Semenuks, McCauls and Rheeders names aren't enough to get you to buy the Ticket why would it make you buy the slope bike?
I was also surprised when I asked Trek if the they are finally going to sale the custom remedy or start selling it under new name and they told me they don´t expect this happens. I understand there is not so many people who would buy, but there are some and I believe the bikers deserves it. Nobody expects cheap bike from Trek and it they are able to do it for their riders, they must be able to it for more riders. So if slopestyle I would go on this one: www.yt-industries.com/shop/index.php?page=product&info=156&x4a94d=nolqpsb08ep99r9occlf3chsrbitjq4a
I used to work for the UK distributor of Banshee Bikes - and we were authorised to sell into any European countries that had no existing distributor
the market for full-suspension slopestyle frames / bikes is tiny - our first shipment of 12 units of Banshee Rampant (100mm slopestyle / 4x) took nearly 14 months to sell through, and that included me buying one of them!
bear in mind we also sold "direct" and were selling at price about 30% below what would otherwise have been the recommended retail price
even at those prices they did not shift quickly because there simply was not enough demand, or the demand was coming from younger riders who could barely afford a hardtail frame, let alone suspension frame
I don't really think comparing the Mythic Rampant is fair as most people haven't heard of it. Without being harsh I saw one of them (Gaz Jones) and personally thought it was ugly as hell (sorry). I believe the lack of market for these types of bike is more down to the fact that there's so few places to ride them. If there were some decent slopestyle stuff here in the UK more bikes would be sold- until then there's no point in paying a fortune for a bike when you're probably better off on a hardtail.
the Rampants actually sold quite well in Canada and North America - a lot of people did hear about it because leading riders Mike Montgomery and Jack Fogelquist were riding AMP and Rampant for Banshee and getting great coverage
you comment about the UK riding scene is valid, there is a lack of decent riding terrain for these kinds of bike, which is why the old 100mm Specialized SX (not the SX Trail) was either not brought into the UK on particular seasons, or was imported in minute numbers on other seasons
4X/slope frames are among the most fun to ride frames on the market. The sale of a Trek Remedy SS frame would not hinge on the popularity of slopestyle as a sport because I think that a good percentage of the sales would be to shop employees and bike junkies who have been waiting for Trek to release the frame ever since it first started showing up in SS competitions.
@bok-CZ The customers haven’t supported Trek’s dirt jump bikes enough to deserve a slopestyle bike. Smaller companies that only exist due to sales of dirt jump bikes can afford to make a slope style bike because they already have that market and even then they are often slow to come to production.
It’s much less expensive to build three frames for your team than thousands for customers who are going to buy bikes from YT industries instead because they don’t want to pay a lot for a bike to just piss around on.
@hampsteadbandit From Strength in Numbers to the Life Behind Bars series, Brandon Semenuk has arguably received more media attention than Mike Montgomery and Jack Fogelquist combined and could even be seen as one of, if not the most talked about riders for 2012 and yet it was not enough to sell the Trek Ticket.
@serpah Bike companies don’t make enough money from selling bikes to shop employees to justify production of a bike that the general public won’t buy regardless of how much of a bike junkie they are. Bike shops probably wouldn’t even stock it for the same reasons. Don’t get me wrong, it would be an amazing bike, but people just won’t buy it, which is why Trek won’t make it. When it’s a race to the bottom for price, good quality doesn’t sell.
i think one of the main reasons the ticket didn't sell is because it's an aluminum frame. cromo frames are what kids ride now if they want a hardtail. they are more durable than aluminum and generally look a lot better, in my opinion. if you're a serious dirt jumper you aren't going to risk riding a lighter aluminum frame that may snap, especially when you aren't getting free frames from trek on the regular. bikes are expensive, and that shit better last
Find a picture of a snapped Trek Ticket. It is less expensive to build a cromo frame than an aluminum frame thus reducing the price so kids can afford it and bmx's use it for dirt jumping so it must be cool. A good quality aluminum frame can be way lighter and just as strong as a high end cromo frame. With the exception of Sam Pilgrim because NS doesn't make an aluminum frame, most pros ride aluminum and the companies representing them certainly wouldn't want the public to see their mangled frame during competition. There are plenty of crashes and frame cases on huge stuff that most kids buying dirt jump bikes will only dream of riding and they still hold up. Apart from fancy graphics, there is no difference between the Trek Ticket the pros ride and what WAS for sale. If anyone is able to have discriminating taste its the pros, but many people who dirt jump long enough eventually switch to aluminum to lighten the bike. I guess Trek could have made a cheaper cromo Ticket in addition to the aluminum one, but why ride that when you can ride exactly what the pros ride? I mean that's the whole appeal of a slope bike in the first place, so that you can no longer blame your bike for not riding like a pro.
yes I got your point and I understand this. I just don´t exactly know all the differences between stock remedy and the custom remedy SS and then for me it looks like it doesn´t have to be a problem to order remedy in custom SS version. Let´s say there is just some adapter in shock mount to get less travel and custom length shock, then it would be easy. If it means heavier tubes, stronger parts of the frame...then ok it doesn´t make any sense, there is already a lot ss bikes.
i dont know what your talkin about..aluminum 4X bikes were MADE for dirt..cro-mo is more park oriented IMO. ive got a banshee amp and its extreamly nimble in the air and a great all around frame, i guess it just lands on personal preferance.
Good DJ frames can be made of aluminium or steel, so long as the angles and the craftsmanship are there either material can build into a light, strong frame that's easy to throw around and fun to ride. Aluminium frames are generally lighter and stiffer than a cromo equivalents which means a high end alu frame is the frame of choice for a pro rider. However steel provides different ride qualities to aluminium and is suitable for use with rigid forks. Steel frames also fatigue much slower and in my opinion look better. These days they're also barely heavier as well. Steel frames are the only real choice in Street and Park, but for dirt it's about a 50:50 split. Either works well and it depends more on the geometry of the frame which works best for you rather than the material.
All U Guys saying that people would buy the Trek SS rig should really look around and take a look of how many of your friends and friends of your frienda nad then their friends use the slopestyle kind of a bike. In my opinion,this Spec frame is nothing new and the work of the rear suspension seems to be rather poor. I'm not saying that SS bike should rip the trail like DH rig,but it's not a problem to build something that works only when U land hard. Martin's frame doesn't seem to work at all and to be honest I'm far from being an optimist for Specialized with their success with introducing this frame. Don't know about the price but Kona with their Bass abd Cowan DS before had the best chance to own the world of slopestyle bikes and it didn't turn out too good for them. And to be honest the suspension in my Bass made a very good impression on one of the creators of Dartmoor Shine. He said that with small changes in the geometry (of course shorter stays and generally lil' smaller frame) that would be the perfect bike for almost every park.dirt jumps etc in the world,but it;s reall unnecassary to biuld that kind of a frame,because nobody really needs it! He told me that everyone who takes that kind of a bike on local spot wants it to be as stiff as possible! It must be like hardtail for 99% of a time and in that 1% of a time spent on a bike it has to give U some extra stabillity and confidence! And that was their intention! I think they reached their goal and I'd take the Shine ove P.Slope anytime and anywhere! I bet it's 3 times cheaper than the Spec! And who da fak needs custom tuned rear shock on the frame that doesn't work excluding really hard landings! Get the Dartmoor and U'll have enough money to finish the whole bike on non basic components! As U can see practicly all of the competition trails can be slayed with the hardtail,which means even the PROs are coming away from the full suspension bikes!
And to whoever said that Trek wouldn't make money off of sales to shop employees: duh
But my point is that customers are always interested in what shop employees are riding. In a small-ish town (15000 people), employees' bikes and setups can heavily influence the average riders' preferred setup because shop employees are always at least 50% more stoked on their bikes than the average consumer. Over the years I have personally influenced several bicycle purchases by customers that reflected my own bikes.
Tell me about it. Fellow mechanic bought a Double. I rode it. Bought a double. Since then - there are four doubles and a bottle rocket in the shops sphere of influence. Let another buddy at a shop ride mine. Two other mechanics over there bought Doubles.
TL;DR. I rode a slopestyle frame. Love'd it. Now a bunch of fellow mechanics and customers ride a slopestyle frame.
@okhlee: I agree with your statements 99% of the way except for "why Slope bikes use simple suspensions"... IMO the design is driven by the need of the riders/discipline. You don't need a special axle path meant to carry speed through a rock garden, you need a STOUT rear suspension (read: pivots) to handle side loading from landing off-angle and really just to suck up some of the "JOLT" from landings (hell some fo the guys are riding HT's at Crankowrks, although they also blew their wheels and tires apart a few tims not having the little added cushion as all the force went into the wheel and something had to give). You also want "pop" and since the travel is so short they're not working with much in terms of complex shock tuning. Todays slope courses look like MX supercross and BMX tracks tracks with some interesting NS style wood work and a few big booters etc. That they can use such a simpe design is just icing on the cake when it comes to mass producing the bikes. I've been a lover of short-travel fullys since before the whole SS genre was ever invented (Norco 4x4) and they'e SO much fun for everything except huge gaps (and even then if the tranny's built well and ya nail it you;re fine). I think Treck is doing themselve a diservice personaly, but then they're not hurting for buyers for their other bikes aye... SS was all the rage (bike wise) a few years ago, and now it's moved onto "Enduro" being the big buzz word in the N. American market. Look at how many companies have completely dropped their FR frames (treck dumped the whole scratch line and the amazing scratch air and while the Slash is really awesome, it's not gonna handle what the scratch did in every respect...) I agree fully with everything else you said though.
Aluminum HT's are, IMO, for XC and 4x race bikes only (oh and bike paths)... Steel HT's ride SO much better that it makes me wonder what companies are thinking making all these "FR HT's" out of alu. (I do get it, it's cheaper then having to source good steel when 90% of your catolouge is made out of Alu. but...) I have an older P3 and while I LOVE the short back end, I find it is SO rough on anything but a polished jump track that it's just painfull to ride. My old 90's Specalized Cromo Rockhopper with the original (and SHOT) elastomer fork is infinitely more forgiving, it's just not something that works the same way cause it was neer meant to be ridden that way... Steel HT's only for me from now on unless it's for riding bike paths or racing 4x... PLus when Steel fails you can ride it out... when alu. goes...often times you go to the hospital
@The-Medic, I agree with you, I know slopestyle bikes need to be stronger at the pivots to deal with side load forces, I am sure the Trek slopebikes are built that way too regardless of the fact their suspension design is still more refined and not at all unnecessary for the riding being done with them. If Trek felt a different design would be better for slopestyle I am sure they would have changed it to a more simple design in the same way that their XC 29ers have a different design. For a brand like NS bikes to do the same thing would be far too expensive for them and that cost would show up in the price of the bikes, hence why they keep their design for a similar bike simple and yet strong.
The "enduro" market is booming and people are more willing to pay for technical frame designs and you would be suprised what the Slash and similar bikes are capable of. Down tuning a Session to a 7" travel single crown bike like McCaul and Rheeder did for Rampage would be easy enough to do, so much so that it doesn't require a new category of bikes.
You make a good point about steel as a material, but that argument can go both ways. Some brands only make steel, like NS Bikes up until recently, but again this is usually because of the cost, not because they feel its necessary a better material. NS is only venturing into full suspension and aluminum because of the money they have made off of their well designed steel bikes. It is possible that the Ticket would sell better in steel, but it would require extra R&D and it doesn't explain why slopebikes which are designed for the same terrain as you pointed out, are all made from aluminum, except for that wacky Dmr Bolt, which is available in aluminum anyways. If steel was really better for that style of riding why would brands that only use steel spend so much money to source out aluminum when they are already steel experts? They have built up a reputation for strength, why sacrifice that unless its a better material that when used properly is just as strong? Trek has much more experience with aluminum and so while a steel dirt jump bike from them may not be comparable to an NS Majesty, an aluminum frame slopestyle bike would be much lighter than the overbuilt NS Soda frame, but of course that would come at a price that many aspiring slopestyle riders would not be willing to accept, hence why that market for the meantime should be left up to brands like NS, until those riders grow up, make more money and seek a lighter slopebike, at which point they can justify the additional cost for the Trek which will have been extremely dialed from the years of competition use.
Agreed... What a strangely intelegent conversation to have on PB aye Good points on Alu. for cost... I aso think it has to do with the new trend to hydro forming and very "sleek artsy" frame design (I know not everyone's doing this but it is very popular and strong so why not have it look good at the same time). I just dont care for the "stress-hardening" results of sustained abuse on aluminum HT's (as in "snap" -vs- "bend") or the ride charectaristics personaly. Weight's a good issue as when you;re flipping and spinning the added weight is probably harder to get around as quickly for some??? And even if you kill a frame a contest, most of these guys are spnsored riders so a new one is a call away or maybe just a walk to the van. NS I'd guess built that bike for a sponsored rider(s) and then uses the marketing of having X rider on the bike sels them to riders who want wht the pros ride, or is aspiring to be a pro one day themselves. makes sense. For the non-spnsored rider, having longevity is a good thing though IMO. And seeing as I'll never ride one of these contests at that level I just prefer to have my street bikes be steel for the ride quality. I think I misspoke a bit, I shouldn't have comapred Street bikes to DJ/Slope bikes as they really have different stress loads and ride needs aye.
Trek's thoughs on their Slope bikes is pretty obvious IMO, kind of a "don't reinvent the wheel" thing. they have a great proven suspension and a frame that's alrady made that they can tweak to wall thickness here and there and viola! they've got a great slope bike. I didn't realze McCaul and Rheeder shortened the travel on their Rampage bikes, but makes sense to balance out with the SC forks they put on them. I can see why Trek did it that way, just didn't care for it personaly, but I'm not Trek ttrying to satisfy customers and make a profit so I don't fault them. I think the slash looks like a SUER fun bike and in reality it's right up my alley, I'm just more interested in how the progressin of the sport is moving away from "FR" bikes and now AM is the hilight of the lines in a lot of cases. in reality most folks are better off an on AM bike anyway, and rather then tol up for a redesign on 3 bikes they paired it down to 2...makes monitary sense to me.
^I think it's interesting what you said there about the sport moving away from freeride and towards all mountain - because I've been thinking the same thing myself.
15 years ago you had one 'mountain bike' that did everything - XC, DH and everything imbetween on one bike. Over the years things have separated out and you have specific bike for every kind of mountain biking XC, trail, AM, FR, DH. Now it seems to be going back to the single 'Mountain Bike' that does everything. No doubt these specific bikes are here to say, but it's interesting to see how things are starting to shape up.
i agree...i have a banshee amp and its my all around do everything bike, hell i even do the cross country trails with it. you dont NEED a bike for every aspect of the sport, but it would be nice. my pockets just aren't deep enough to own a bike for every riding style i do, plus living an an appartment doesnt allow me to have a lot of bikes...no where to keep em.
youd think someone at POC would show martin which way the goggles are supposed to face.... Awesome edit btw. im stoked on this bike, although i gotta say i think i might like the looks of the old sx better.
just bought a p3 and it is hands down the best frame i have ever ridden, also have a custom frame from dobermann and the p3 is so much better and if i had a choice between a le pink and a pslope. hand me a p slope no doubt!
thing shreds like a beast i have had mine 2 days now. and this is just the p3 frameset everyone else rides and its amazing for dirt jumps, street, tricks, trails pump tracks. it rides better than a frame i had dobermann make custom for me in size and measures. its amazing how specialized has dialed this frame. for me id find some use for this frame. my buddy and i were talking about if we got a fully because he just got the p3 also and we both said p slope hands down.
I want to be a slopestyle rider but really,you don't get enough places to take advantage of the full abilities of the slope bike,Because there aren't many slopestyle courses as there are dirt jumps,Or Trek must see it that way,If it was affordable I for sure would buy a trek slope bike if they made one available to the public,Anyway,The bikes looks hella sick,I would love to be the owner of one,And I probably will never be hahaha,Sick bike,Sick riders!
I was able to check out the Doberman LePink at the shop, and being full cromo it is very, very heavy. I hate to conjecture, but I'd be surprised if the frame without the shock is under 8 lbs. I'm sure this P-Slope is significantly lighter.
I just got off the bore with Specialized and they did say that it will be available in Canada with in a month or longer. There was conformation on specs yet it will have the rock shox which that you see and will have a Argile fork. There will only be in a large sized frame and only a full build kit. They might sell it as a frame set yet it is not confirmed yet. And as for the price all they could say was that it could range from $2200 to $2800. And the price will be confirmed at the end of next month. I can't wait until it comes out.
Specialized stepping it up, every new frame platform should have 2 years design/testing minimum. Other companies better learn something. This frame would eat the city streets alive then go to the trails for desert.
I'm torn. After working for a family-owned Specialized dealer who went bankrupt due to the ever-increasing amount of stock they had to buy to keep the brand, I still have a bad taste for them. However, I'm glad to see them support the sport with the Demo and this.
This commercial is amazing. I've never even been on a slopestyle course and I want one. I'm already trying to rationalize in my head what I'll say to the wife. I'm sure it'll be good for jump trails, dj, and pump track too.
He probably just cracked a little bone or bruised something, not full back break. If he'd actually broken his back he'd not have been in Vegas (at least not on his own feet and with no help) and definitely not here shredding a month later.
why didn't he? I'm 17 and have earned thousands of pounds from part time work and taking photos. Just because you're not proactive enough to get off your arse and work for nice things doesnt mean everyone is the same. Either that or he prioritises spending it on bikes over other things. But either way I'd be jealous of set up like that!
I'm 17, have two jobs, and college. I spend 90% of my extra money on bikes and I probably will for the rest of my life. Working every day after school for 8 bucks an hour till I get an education.
so what if he's not, if your parents wanted to by you a garage full of nice bikes, i'd be damned if any of you turned it down, so stop giving this kid stick out of jealousy.
My parents support my biking hobby so much they bought me a 2012 Demo 8 II to get started, (keeps out of trouble etc.) unlike many kids I truly appreciate their efforts of making me happy. I wouldn't be surprised if they got me this bike, but I honestly wanna pay for it myself so people would quit giving me S***t about it.
"gravityhelps", I'm not kidding when I say I saved up for it. Both bikes are 2012 and together costed me about $4,850, so when you save for a long time and find pretty good deals I bet many kids my age are capable saving enough for bikes like these. It definitely makes you take care of things more when you buy them yourself.
Exactly. Specialized has Rock Shox on all his bikes and most of his athletes use them (Hill and Brosnan, Ropellato, Söderström, the Coastal Crew...), but Claw is sponsored by Fox, so he's gotta run their stuff. That's why his comes without shock out of the box and Martin's has the Monarch.
An that is the worst part of the comercial for Specialized! It shows that U really don't need their extra dope custom tuned rock shox shock to get this frame work! And I bet,they cound some $ for this custom shock...
No I'm just saying that Bearclaw's move shows all the viewers that this frame doesn't need a custom tuned shock to work properly. And I'm pretty sure that custom tuned Monarch is for sure more expensive than the "standard one" and that's my point!
Darrens shock is probably custom valved / tuned too. most of the slope frames, to my knowledge, have custom valved/tuned shocks so that they have the amount of low speed dampening and stiffness that the dj slope riders want. regardless of what company's shock they're running its the same idea, the bike companies custom tune it for the frame, in order to give the appropriate feel and stiffness.
rmx 1 did U ever use the slopestyle frame? Most of my friends who ride the slopestyle frame use standard,stock shocks and none of them gets the idea of custom tuning. The most important thing is that the rear triangle suppose to b e as stiff as possible and work only when a huge impact happens. They really don't need anything but the rebound to make their bike work properly. And I'm talking about my friends who are sponsored by Dartmoor like Szymon Godziek,Piotr "Kraja" Krajewski etc.
not that i want to turn this into an argument, i just wanted to put in my 2 cents, but I wasn't talking about personal set ups, since riders can put whatever they want on their frame, I was referring to the complete frame sets that companies offer and what they put on them but yeah, I've ridden the new p slope ( and loved it! =) ) as well as several other slope bikes and pros bikes, and from talking to the guys at specialized, custom tuning the shock was they only way to achieve the air pressure and dampening they needed to make the shock as stiff as possible, and to make it so it only opened on hard landings and not during low speed compressions like lips and berms.
Only thing I'm saying is that the frame from Specialized including the custom Monarch (which I assume will be how it's sold) it's almost definitely going to be cheaper than ordering the "nude" frame and then buying a Fox shock like Claws or any other shock alone. When packed together always goes a bit cheaper. It's like buying a bike. Buy a full bike, then try to buy all it's exact parts separately: it's going to cost more for sure.
I got a chance to jump on one in whistler, and it ripped the trails great! Granite it is a slope dirt jump bike, but it did really good on trails as well.
agreed
I used to work for the UK distributor of Banshee Bikes - and we were authorised to sell into any European countries that had no existing distributor
the market for full-suspension slopestyle frames / bikes is tiny - our first shipment of 12 units of Banshee Rampant (100mm slopestyle / 4x) took nearly 14 months to sell through, and that included me buying one of them!
bear in mind we also sold "direct" and were selling at price about 30% below what would otherwise have been the recommended retail price
even at those prices they did not shift quickly because there simply was not enough demand, or the demand was coming from younger riders who could barely afford a hardtail frame, let alone suspension frame
It just looks like an awesome frame for general pissing about on.
the Rampants actually sold quite well in Canada and North America - a lot of people did hear about it because leading riders Mike Montgomery and Jack Fogelquist were riding AMP and Rampant for Banshee and getting great coverage
you comment about the UK riding scene is valid, there is a lack of decent riding terrain for these kinds of bike, which is why the old 100mm Specialized SX (not the SX Trail) was either not brought into the UK on particular seasons, or was imported in minute numbers on other seasons
The customers haven’t supported Trek’s dirt jump bikes enough to deserve a slopestyle bike. Smaller companies that only exist due to sales of dirt jump bikes can afford to make a slope style bike because they already have that market and even then they are often slow to come to production.
It’s much less expensive to build three frames for your team than thousands for customers who are going to buy bikes from YT industries instead because they don’t want to pay a lot for a bike to just piss around on.
@hampsteadbandit
From Strength in Numbers to the Life Behind Bars series, Brandon Semenuk has arguably received more media attention than Mike Montgomery and Jack Fogelquist combined and could even be seen as one of, if not the most talked about riders for 2012 and yet it was not enough to sell the Trek Ticket.
@serpah
Bike companies don’t make enough money from selling bikes to shop employees to justify production of a bike that the general public won’t buy regardless of how much of a bike junkie they are. Bike shops probably wouldn’t even stock it for the same reasons. Don’t get me wrong, it would be an amazing bike, but people just won’t buy it, which is why Trek won’t make it. When it’s a race to the bottom for price, good quality doesn’t sell.
yes I got your point and I understand this. I just don´t exactly know all the differences between stock remedy and the custom remedy SS and then for me it looks like it doesn´t have to be a problem to order remedy in custom SS version. Let´s say there is just some adapter in shock mount to get less travel and custom length shock, then it would be easy. If it means heavier tubes, stronger parts of the frame...then ok it doesn´t make any sense, there is already a lot ss bikes.
i dont know what your talkin about..aluminum 4X bikes were MADE for dirt..cro-mo is more park oriented IMO. ive got a banshee amp and its extreamly nimble in the air and a great all around frame, i guess it just lands on personal preferance.
In my opinion,this Spec frame is nothing new and the work of the rear suspension seems to be rather poor.
I'm not saying that SS bike should rip the trail like DH rig,but it's not a problem to build something that works only when U land hard. Martin's frame doesn't seem to work at all and to be honest I'm far from being an optimist for Specialized with their success with introducing this frame. Don't know about the price but Kona with their Bass abd Cowan DS before had the best chance to own the world of slopestyle bikes and it didn't turn out too good for them.
And to be honest the suspension in my Bass made a very good impression on one of the creators of Dartmoor Shine. He said that with small changes in the geometry (of course shorter stays and generally lil' smaller frame) that would be the perfect bike for almost every park.dirt jumps etc in the world,but it;s reall unnecassary to biuld that kind of a frame,because nobody really needs it! He told me that everyone who takes that kind of a bike on local spot wants it to be as stiff as possible!
It must be like hardtail for 99% of a time and in that 1% of a time spent on a bike it has to give U some extra stabillity and confidence! And that was their intention! I think they reached their goal and I'd take the Shine ove P.Slope anytime and anywhere!
I bet it's 3 times cheaper than the Spec!
And who da fak needs custom tuned rear shock on the frame that doesn't work excluding really hard landings!
Get the Dartmoor and U'll have enough money to finish the whole bike on non basic components!
As U can see practicly all of the competition trails can be slayed with the hardtail,which means even the PROs are coming away from the full suspension bikes!
And to whoever said that Trek wouldn't make money off of sales to shop employees: duh
But my point is that customers are always interested in what shop employees are riding. In a small-ish town (15000 people), employees' bikes and setups can heavily influence the average riders' preferred setup because shop employees are always at least 50% more stoked on their bikes than the average consumer. Over the years I have personally influenced several bicycle purchases by customers that reflected my own bikes.
TL;DR. I rode a slopestyle frame. Love'd it. Now a bunch of fellow mechanics and customers ride a slopestyle frame.
You get exactly what I'm saying.
NS does have an aluminum frame now..ita called the NS decade
The "enduro" market is booming and people are more willing to pay for technical frame designs and you would be suprised what the Slash and similar bikes are capable of. Down tuning a Session to a 7" travel single crown bike like McCaul and Rheeder did for Rampage would be easy enough to do, so much so that it doesn't require a new category of bikes.
15 years ago you had one 'mountain bike' that did everything - XC, DH and everything imbetween on one bike. Over the years things have separated out and you have specific bike for every kind of mountain biking XC, trail, AM, FR, DH. Now it seems to be going back to the single 'Mountain Bike' that does everything. No doubt these specific bikes are here to say, but it's interesting to see how things are starting to shape up.
Maybe it isn't AUtoCAD. I'd like to know what it is exactly
It shows that U really don't need their extra dope custom tuned rock shox shock to get this frame work!
And I bet,they cound some $ for this custom shock...
And I'm pretty sure that custom tuned Monarch is for sure more expensive than the "standard one" and that's my point!
Cheers Jose
Most of my friends who ride the slopestyle frame use standard,stock shocks and none of them gets the idea of custom tuning.
The most important thing is that the rear triangle suppose to b e as stiff as possible and work only when a huge impact happens.
They really don't need anything but the rebound to make their bike work properly.
And I'm talking about my friends who are sponsored by Dartmoor like Szymon Godziek,Piotr "Kraja" Krajewski etc.
Cheers
but yeah, I've ridden the new p slope ( and loved it! =) ) as well as several other slope bikes and pros bikes, and from talking to the guys at specialized, custom tuning the shock was they only way to achieve the air pressure and dampening they needed to make the shock as stiff as possible, and to make it so it only opened on hard landings and not during low speed compressions like lips and berms.
www.pinkbike.com/photo/8539663