Alpinestars Bionic Neck Support Brace And SLC Knee Pads: Safety Check

Jul 7, 2010
by Mike Levy  
Better known for their moto gear, Alpinestars also has a full line of mountain bike clothing and protective items. Inside we take a closer look at their Bionic Neck Support brace and the slim fitting SLC knee pads.

Read on...
Alpinestars Bionic Neck Support

photo
Alpinestars Bionic Neck Support

The Alpinestars Bionic Neck Support is designed to prevent or limit injury to the user's neck by restricting the amount the head can move in the event of a crash. When the rider's helmet comes in contact with the BNS's frame it stops it from moving any further and distributes the load through the brace, or in the event of rearward head movement, down the rear stabilizer. Another feature, albeit less obvious, is the collarbone protection afforded by the BNS's wrap around frame that sits just above the users collarbone. The Bionic Neck Support is hinged at the back and latched up front to allow for easier installation or removal. In the event that the brace needs to be removed without disturbing an injured rider it can actually be separated into three pieces via the BNS's magnesium key found at the rear of the brace. Alpinestars offers two models on the Bionic Neck Support that share the same principles and design, but use different materials. The model shown here is the Special Blend and retails for $425.00 CAD and comes in sizes from XS to XL. If you want to loose some grams and gain some carbon, you can spring for the more expensive Bionic Neck Support, but keep in mind that the high end model is only available in small, medium, and large.

photo
The BNS from the side


Alpinestars Bionic Neck Support details

  • Pivot Key system: A special magnesium key located at the rear allows the convenient front opening of the device while also allowing it to be dismantled in an emergency.
  • Fitting System: Fine adjustment of the shoulder height allows for a more personalized fit – particularly for individuals who have a shorter than normal neck.
  • Rear Stabilizer Failure system: In the event of large loads being channeled onto the rear stabilizer (the part that sits on the back) there are a number of deliberate bending and fracture points designed to relieve extreme loads that may be transmitted down the back.
  • Collar Bone preservation 1: All parts in contact with the body use an expanded foam compound to distribute the impact force over the widest area yet remain light in weight.
  • Collar Bone preservation 2: A continuous frame member runs over the shoulders – this means there are no weak points in a critical part of the frame and that there are no metal pins or screws sitting directly above the shoulders which could be dislodged into the shoulders or collarbone during an accident.
  • Choice of Strap Systems: The BNS is supplied with the X-Strap System which allows a small, light strap (worn over or under the jersey) to secure the device to the rider. The larger A-Strap assembly (available as a separate accessory) provides a traditional chest strap for those who like to wear the protector tight to the body.
  • MSRP $425.00 CAD


photo
The Bionic Neck Support latches at the front

bigquotesI used to wear a full upper body suit and eventually wore it less and less due to hassle, heavy, hot, all the excuses in the world really. I would often worry about getting hurt and I still do, but since picking up a neck brace I feel a lot more at ease. They've been developed to help reduce the risks of a broken neck in a serious crash and while I may not be an expert rider, I feel that I am highly at risk of regular crashes. My neck brace makes me feel safer. - Tyler Maine

photo
Rear support on the BNS



Alpinestars SLC knee pads

photo
Alpinestars SLC knee pads

The Alpinestars SLC knee pads are deigned to be minimal, but effective pads for riders who are looking for something other than the usual bulky offerings. They are made from a combination of breathable foam and a fabric covered, kevlar patella cup, as well as flexible nylon panels that allow for more freedom than other materials. The slim design of the SLC's should also be ideal for riders who are looking for protection underneath their pants. The fit is adjustable via two Velcro straps and can be put on or removed. Riders who don't put their pads on until reaching the top of the hill will appreciate the fact that they don't have to remove their shoes to do it.

photo
The SLC uses a soft patella cup and breathable materials that make it perfect for warm days

Alpinestars SLC knee pad details

  • Made using breathable, laminated impact foam and flexible nylon panels
  • Kevlar fabric covered soft shell patella protection
  • Dual density inner liner
  • Quick release buckles on elastic straps
  • Sizes: S-XL
  • MSRP $75.00 CAD

photo
Silicone grippers on the inside edges help to keep the SLC in place

bigquotesAt first glance the SLC knee pads look at lot like 95% of the current knee protection offerings. But it was the lack of a full back or "sock" like fit that won me over. Two straps mean that I can put these on / take them off with out removing my shoes and that alone is worth picking them up. The interior knee area is shaped to cup your knee and stay in place during a day of riding. I have even worn them under my jeans for a few bike park laps. - Tyler Maine


Get in touch with the Canadian Distributor Hans van der Griend at hansvdg@me.com if your shop is looking for a new MTB armor line up.

Visit Alpinestars.com to see their entire lineup of protective goods and clothing, or hit up their on-line mountain bike catalog to see what they offer.

Author Info:
mikelevy avatar

Member since Oct 18, 2005
2,032 articles
Report
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

65 Comments
  • 12 5
 wow, that thing looks like a cheap child's toy compared to the leatt..
  • 11 3
 They are very different in appearance, but the function is bang on for each. Having owned each, I am happier with the range of motion of the A Star over the Leatt. While the Leatt may be more padded, those just collect dust and most riders will never clean theirs. The A Star is easy to wipe down and I've never thought to myself "Wow I wish this was padded.."
  • 6 5
 I went from an A star to a Leatt.

The difference in quality is outstanding! The alpinestars was awful, half of it didn't even line up! Also it has no adjustment - sizing comes up big as a size small was too big for me and im not a small guy!

The thing about it that I do like though is the range of movement over the Leatt, thats a given. Though you do get used to it and don't notice it after a few rides (however obtrusive a leatt is to begin with).
  • 4 1
 Did you have the carbon one or not? The carbon one actually looks worse than the non-carbon one because it uses a different type of padding. I own an alpinestars neck brace and the quality of mine is superb.

I've never actually tried a leatt but having watched Ryan Dungeys Leatt come undown of its own acord half way through a race it didnt really give me a good image of the Leatt.
  • 5 7
 IMO, the Apinestars neck brace will not help at all, It's too slim, so the neck will still over-extend before hitting the brace. The Leatt provides a good raised surface for the helmet to hit, and prevent hyper-extension, whereas the Alpinestars brace appears that it will not provide much more protection from extension as the Leatt. In the pictures above, it is clear that there is at least a 30cm gap from back of helmet to brace, I'm no expert but I believe that would be enough to cause severe damage in the case of a crash?
  • 3 4
 I would tend to agree with Teejay05. That gap at the back seems huge. It would seem that your neck would break long before the back of your helmet even comes close to hitting it. The combination with TLD D2 helmets may make it even worse as they tend to be cut quite high in the back. And the use of EPS foam just looks like it's waiting to deteriorate. And what's with those knee pads? Only covering the front? They look like they're going to rotate right off at the first sign of impact. I was equally disappointed with the Moab shin guards.
  • 6 2
 I happen to have a bit of a professional opinion on this sort of thing (I am an orthopaedic consultant)and I must say that I worry for your neck's safety in that brace Tyler. The backstop isn't nearly close enough to your helmet to prevent hyper-extension of your cervical spine in case of a crash.

It may allow more range of motion than your Leatt, but the point of these devices is to significantly REDUCE that range so that you do not move into an excessive range of motion that would cause serious injury during a bad crash.
  • 3 3
 leatt is a better brace. like dingo dave said, it has too much space between the bottom of the helmet to the top of the brace. iv actually gotton a chance to test the leatt. iv hi-sided on my motorcycle at 60 miles an hour and landed on my head. the only thing saving my neck was the leatt.
  • 2 7
flag trail-governor (Jul 7, 2010 at 10:10) (Below Threshold)
 u look like ass
  • 3 1
 Thanks Dave. Since these pics were taken, I bought a D3 at Calgary Cycle as I wanted a larger helmet for a better interface. I wanted to go back to Moto lids, but found that most I tried sat directly on my brace and that hindered all movement. We'll see how the D3 is next time I head out to DH.
  • 2 2
 all im gonna say is a kid i know crashed and the alpinestar did nothing but break in half which ended causing him more injuries, i dont reccomend the alpinestar, there are better reviews for the leatt around and plus its cheaper
  • 2 0
 the neckbrace seems to sit too low to actually stop (prevent) you from breaking your neck .... even though the leatt brace dosnt alow as much movement id feel it is more likely to prevent injury
  • 2 0
 I had the normal BNS, the carbon one is £300 more for 90g difference! They are bloody heavy as it is anyway.

The quality on them is shite.
  • 1 0
 Most of your comments have been bulls**t in my opinion. I have the A* and the quality is great. As for the brace sitting too low...the brace comes with an extra piece of 'foam' that sits below the brace on the shoulders, therefore raising the brace another 1 or 2 cm.

When riding downhill, I find that the back of my (D2) helmet hit the back of the brace. With the D3 helmet I feel even safer and the 'gap' is even more reduced.

Its a Brilliant brace.

Finally, I doubt they would sell the brace if the chance of it being more dangerous to wear one compared to not wearing one was greater...
  • 1 0
 The plastic didn't line up on mine and it just felt tacky. Hence my quality comment versus the Leatt which seems far far better made and more durable when you have the two in each hand.

Depends on the individual size wise, what has been generally found is they come up large compared to a leatt etc. There's no independent studies to show if these braces really do help or not as far as im aware. Yeah it limits your neck movement - but could that do more damage?
  • 1 0
 Fair points. I think the reason why the A* brace doesn't always line up in the front has something to do with the pivot key and the way you can take it appart.
I love the brace anyway, so we will see if have an injury as time goes by.

Peace
  • 1 0
 @Dingo-dave. Do you have an evidence base to support that statement?
  • 1 0
 Which part of my statement?
  • 5 0
 If you would read the description on the site is says that a bionic neck can only be worn with an mx helmet, because it's so low it does not work wit a mtb helmet.
  • 2 0
 It's very important that the proper helmet is worn with the Alpine Star because it has a lower profile than the Leatt therefore it has a bigger gap between the bottom of the helmet and the brace which means the neck can extend further during a crash. Alpine Star says the best helmet for their brace is a moto one / mtb lids are shorter although the rep said that some protection is better than none. I went with Leatt.
  • 2 0
 Do they mention this on their website? I see no mention of using MX lids anywhere. Or did an Alpinestars rep tell you this? In general, I find the lack of documentation and information a bit questionable. Leatt's documentation on use and fit seems to be a lot more complete.
  • 2 0
 I'm not sure if they mention this on their web site or not but yes the rep did tell me this. I argree, Leatt is comprehensive in term of documentation and I believe them to be the industry standard.
  • 2 0
 It's been discussed a ton of times that the Alpinestars brace is not intended to primarily against fore/aft breaks, but against compaction/compression injuries that slam the head downward, not angular or bending forces on the neck. They conducted testing and found data indicating there was a greater risk of injury from compression fractures than twisting/bending ones that the Leatt mitigates.

Read up on both and decide which you consider more important and choose between the two. They are intended to both protect against two different types of injury.
  • 1 1
 Who is "They"?

APS says they designed it to protect against compression, sure.

Now, what requirements do you suppose validate this? Well, to stop compression, you need to minimize the distance the neck can physically compress. That means, the brace must stand considerably higher around your neck area to decrease the area of travel the neck has. This ALSO must be complemented by how far down your helmet will extend around your head. When helmet meets brace, you reach your stopping point. Slimmer brace, higher helmet = more travel = BAD. Taller brace, lower helmet, = less travel = good. And the length of one persons neck to anothers will also affect effectiveness, yes?

So, if the APS sits more flush around the shoulders - ie it sits lower, than the leatt - and it does, because I tried both on before I bought a brace - how do you suppose sitting lower is more effective in reducing the amount your neck can compress? Doesn't make sense, sir. Don't buy into the hype.

I would suggest wearing a moto helmet myself...if wearing either brace. And I believe more in the Leatt. But that's only my own personal evaluation based on trying on several braces with several helmets. I'm in no way going to tell you I am 100% right. But I think it's very sound logic, myself.
  • 1 0
 Just look at the picture in the article... do you really think that the brace would prevent compression? There must be at least 3 inches between the bottom edge of the helmet and the lateral stays! I would think that a brace preventing compression of the cervical spine would engage before the spine had already been compressed 3 inches.

Whatever brand of model you buy, IT'S ALL ABOUT FIT. This is not armour, it's an orthopaedic device (look up cervical collars on Google for Pete's sake) designed to control range of motion in the cervical region of your spinal cord. If the brace does not have a snug, dare I say tight, fit then the device is limited in effect.

Plain and simple.

On a side note, a compressed disc or a compression fracture of a vertebra is not as life-threatening as a very serious hyper-extension or hyper-flexion injury to the spinal cord.
  • 4 0
 I'm not arguing for or against either brace. Just wanted to point out the differences in philosophy of the 2 brands.

As for the review. It's terrible. Why? Because he didn't research it at all. He gave no background info on the type of injury this brace looks to defend against. And he made no mention of the setup he ran other than a photo. That brace has two different height settings controlled by pads. Is he wearing it in the high position or the low position? Did he check with Alpinestars to see if the helmet he's wearing is even compatible with the brace and the height setting he has it on?

Better context next time brother. Big Grin
  • 2 0
 i recently fractured my c5 and broke a piece off my c6 in a dirtbike incident. My head/helmet compacted then rotated back and smashed into my spine.
In my research I have come to the conclusion that the a-star unit is not much more than a pretty necklace and I bought a Leatt. IMO the leatt is the only neck brace that was engineered to protect the neck and collarbones. The others were marketed to compete with the leatt.
  • 2 0
 There's a lot of arguments going on over which neck brace is better. At the end of the day more people wearing braces can only be good and having a wider variety of them on the market means more people may be able to fit or afford one!
  • 1 0
 True, but only if all of them WORK! I'm all for wide product ranges and competitive pricing, but the products have to do what they're designed to do (just as all helmets must pass industry standards and be certified). At this point, I am skeptical (at best) about this product.
  • 1 0
 Thats what I was saying about more on the market...as not everyone has the same shape body there is a wider variety of brace sizes / shapes on the market. If everyone has a correctly sized brace for their helmet then obviously a lot more injuries will be stopped.
  • 2 0
 I get the whole what is the price of your neck, but man these things are crazy expensive. i wish the price would come down to make them more acessable to us that don't have 300-400 dollars to spend. Esspecially when all they are is plastic/fiberglass and foam.
  • 1 0
 I think its the research and developement thats gone into them, making them as effective and safe as possible... I could be wrong
  • 1 0
 What is the price of your neck.....? Have you looked into what they charge for wheelchairs?
  • 3 1
 I have the Alpinestars neck brace and it is worth its weight in gold. Within minutes of my first ride with it I did not even notice it anymore. And then this weekend it completely paid for itself. During my first training run for our downhill race in Grande Prairie, Alberta I blew a corner on one of the fastest sections of the course and went head on into a tree. I knocked myself pretty silly and my neck was pretty sore. Eventhough the tree was slightly rotten in the middle, I hit the tree hard enough to knock it over. i know for a fact that I got off lucky because the neck brace definitely limited the range of motion and literally saved my neck. Every rider should have one, Alpinestars or Leatt, you will just have to find which fits your body the best as at the end of the day they are both just as good at saving your neck.
  • 1 0
 Have you tried wearing it with body armor, i.e. with a back protector or full jacket?

I know that may be a hassle, heavy, and hot. But it may still be a good idea to wear one, and it would be really cool if the neck brace was compatible with the body armor.
  • 1 1
 Personally I throw on some elbow pads once in a while, but most folks that I know who wear armor (full body or chest etc.) have had to modify their equipment to fit any of the braces.
  • 1 0
 Neck protection systems like Leat/Alpinstar/EVS RC Evo are all well and good, but I would still caution people from thinking that they are a substitute for upper-body armour, since they are protecting completely different parts of the body. The protection of shoulders, kidneys, chest, and back offered by upper-body armour is still very important, at least for those mortals (like myself) who still need to drag their sorry butts in to work on Monday morning.
  • 1 0
 At the end of the day, any neck brace is going to be better than none... Although it may be a bit more restrictive (although I don't really find that) , im sure the Leatt offers the best protection as it sits snug into the helmet...
  • 1 0
 wait tyler, this comment doesn't make sense... "I used to wear a full upper body suit and eventually wore it less and less due to hassle, heavy, hot, all the excuses in the world really. I would often worry about getting hurt and I still do, but since picking up a neck brace I feel a lot more at ease. They've been developed to help reduce the risks of a broken neck in a serious crash and while I may not be an expert rider, I feel that I am highly at risk of regular crashes. My neck brace makes me feel safer"....upper body gear was and never is designed for neck injuries,and neck braces are not designed to replace upper body armor, nor act as it. Just seems like your saying you are compensating for the lack of armor, when in reality your not doing anything to replace it, your just using something not closely related to armor. Your spine will still crumble on a good spinal impact with no plate. Neck protection won't do squat for lower spine.
  • 3 0
 I have the aplinestars brace and I use it for dirtbiking, its saved my life twice, enough said. I dont know how effective it would be with the helmet shown above though.
  • 7 3
 i would love to be sponsered by alpinestar :'(
  • 3 0
 I use a RC Evolution neck brace. It is very comfortable, functions great AND is almost one quarter the cost.....
  • 1 0
 Read up on the brace's they have different ideas of what cause's injury.
Part 1
www.cyclenews.com/articles/in...alk-about-it/1

Part 2
www.cyclenews.com/articles/in...k-about-it-2/1
  • 2 0
 www.cyclenews.com/articles/industry-news/2009/11/04/neck-protection-let-s-talk-about-it-2

the first links do not work. Its a long read but has a lot of info.
  • 1 0
 I have a hard time believing that those knee pads would stay put in a crash. A picture that shows the upper structure of the front of the pad would be helpful. How about an update after a crash with those knee pads?
  • 1 0
 I'm curious if the SLC knees slip down while riding. I love wearing the 661 Kyle Straight pads but my legs overheat in the full neoprene 'knee-sock'. These look really comfortable as they have an open back.
  • 1 0
 Does anyone recommend getting these knee pads ? Smile
  • 2 0
 Are there any pictures of the X-strap system? I assume the A-strap system is the same sort of thing as on a Leatt.
  • 1 0
 Two straps.

One over your head, under your armpit, same with the other but opposite armpit. So you have an X going in front of you.

The two bits of strap that are then around your neck slot onto two little catches on the neck brace, pulling it down.

That make sense?
  • 2 2
 a freind has this, its a good quality looking bit of kit, stays put and gives him a decent range of movement, and though it looks minimal i'd trust alpinestars with my life over leatt 8 days of the week.
  • 1 0
 the knee pads look like little kid pads, no side or back protection makes me nervous. Somthing with complete coverage looks much better. go 661 or a similar product.
  • 1 1
 I think it is about personal preference - I don't want a full back as I pedal a lot and don't like the sweaty back of knee area that happens with most other options and used to cut my pads to have open backs. I also don't want to take my shoes off/on to put the pads on/off and these fit the bill for me and they were like 25% less expensive than 661 Kyle Straights
  • 1 1
 for mtb its leatt all the way, that neckbrace wont do shit for him with the high back helmet, the neck damage will be done before the brace stops the helmet... but for low back helmets like mx helmets its bang on
  • 2 1
 every single rider out there should have a leatt or an alpine star brace no questions asked
  • 1 0
 why make them so expensive?? i would wear one if i could afford it of course
  • 1 1
 because if a company made one for $25 nobody would buy it.
  • 2 0
 You much is your head worth?

-KT
  • 1 0
 Knees look a little flimsy for DH but would probably be great for DJ
  • 1 1
 The leatt club can be had for 150 bucks and is a far superior brace. Save the money!
  • 2 5
 I tried one of those neck braces one its actually and effort to open it with out moving your body or neck
  • 5 1
 Not sure what you mean, as in it was tough to put on and take off as in you couldn't figure out the clasp?
  • 2 1
 no like extremely stiff and ridgid almost like if an accident was to happen it would do more worst then good if you tried to take it off. How did you feel with yours
  • 4 1
 Having owned both, they are both excessively easy to remove. I've seem a rider get knocked out at a recent race and the medics had no issues removing his AStar brace. Both it and the Leatt are meant to remove easily.
  • 1 0
 Fair enough most have been cos it was new and stiff or something







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.092537
Mobile Version of Website