Pinkbike presenter Tom Bradshaw took it back to the basics with no rear suspension this spring on
the Commencal Meta HT AM, but he says he's cheating on the hardcore hardtailers now that his Meta AM 29 has arrived. It will be his daily driver and enduro race bike, while the Supreme DH 29/27 will be his DH race bike and bike park machine.
Bradshaw went for the Meta AM 29, with a 170mm fork and 160mm of rear travel for maximum chunder-eating ability. Tom's a fit guy, with an all
off-road Everest on Fromme Mountain on Vancouver's North Shore in his back pocket, as well as some
World Cup XC racing under his belt when he was a junior and he says he has no problem pedalling a bigger bike.
Bradshaw loves that weird type 2 fun (miserable while it’s happening, but fun in retrospect) that borders on type 3 (not fun at all, not even in retrospect) and in his most recent Pinkbike video,
he tries to ride 100 trails in a day in Cumberland, BC on the Meta AM 29.
 | I wanted the big machine for confidence on steep, fast, chunky trails here in the Sea to Sky as well as on EWS and other enduro race courses if I can make it there! I’ve got no problems pedalling a slightly longer travel bike all day too, I really value the confidence, and bigger insurance policy I get from the bigger suspension platform, particularly when I’m trying to follow people I have no business following, or hitting features I have no business hitting.—Tom Bradshaw |
200mm front and rear rotors for the SRAM RSC Codes.
Bradshaw says he runs his bite point dangerously close to the bar, as he feels more comfortable with his fingers closer to a fist.
Tom rides a 170mm RockShox Reverb AXS on the Meta AM 29.
Never not stoked to ride.
Tom's Pinkbike content is supported by Commencal, RockShox, Sram, Zipp, Schwalbe, Deity, Garmin, Pit Viper, 7idp Protection.
103 Comments
if: Fun = FUNction(Expected, Achieved, Retrospective)
and: Expected, Achieved, and Retrospective can take values of Low, Variable, and High,
then: Type 1 Fun = High Expected, High Achieved, High Retrospective
and: Type 2 Fun = High Expected, Low Achieved, High Retrospective
or: Type 3 Fun = High Expected, Low Achieved, Low Retrospective
This gives us the options of 27 types of fun. Type 8 fun is basically a bad hangover after a raucous party: High expected, High achieved, low retrospective
Terrible expectation of fun,
Terrible achieved fun,
and terrible retrospective??
Bradshaw loves that weird type 2 fun (miserable while it’s happening, but fun in retrospect) that borders on type 3 (not fun at all, not even in retrospect)" -I swear that was lifted word for word from an earlier article.
Many articles online are written by bots, maybe PB is going the same direction.
Seems to be a typo, should be Super Gravity rear, or?
Personally, I run super gravity front and back.
I put a Wolftooth B-rad mount underneath to push it back, worked a treat, but was a bit annoyed I had to do it for a such a otherwise well designed bike.
It's around 2.5 kg heavier than my previous trail bike with 135 mm of travel and I still managed to take a handful of uphill PBs.
Going downhill is a proper monster. Where I could feel that I'm riding on the edge with my old trail bike, this one is sure footed and miles from the limit. Honestly, I don't think I will ever be able to say that this bike is holding me down. Even if my technique improves significantly.
After that idiotic review on enduro magazine I was scared that my Large Meta will be somehow unbalanced because of short chainstays (my old trail bike had 450 mm) and that my front wheel will wash out whenever I don't pay attention... Never happened. On my firs 3 rides I was expecting it in every turn. I almost felt disappointed when I found out that bike just rails through the turns like it should.
However, there is a trail on my local hill that is some kind of narrow manmade light downhill pumptrack with a lot of flowy but tight turns. On this bike I can't get anywhere near my old PB.
Also, very steep seat angle is fantastic for climbing but on flats (I have around 15-20 minutes of riding through the city to get to the beginning of the uphill trail) you can feel that pressure on your hands is significant. Especially on the way back home after the ride.
revolutionmtb.com.au/reviewed-commencal-meta-am-29
fullattack.cc/verdict-le-commencal-meta-am-29-est-il-trop-bien/#ancre4
I've got the same fork and shock, and I find 4 clicks of HSC on the fork to be super harsh. I ride 1 for trails, and 2 for park.
And YES we'd like to see that type 3 ride soon.
Something to do with measuring pressure? Do you have to put counter weights on the opposite side of the rim to balance them out?
176cm > 5'9"
5'8" < 173cm
My previous rides were a Devinci Troy and a YT Capra and I quickly found their limits, despite my best efforts the Meta has yet to reveal a single weakness beyond a slight aversion to the tightest of switch backs.