Video By The Coastal Crew, filmed by Harookz and featuring Dylan Dunkerton and Curtis Robinson.
Photography: Harookz
Music: Look Out To See by Paul White, courtesy of One-Handed Music
Original article and more photos
Just in case you didn't catch it, the Coastal Crew are riding e-bikes in their latest video, fittingly titled 'Skeptical' in reference to the duo's thoughts about e-bikes in general. Take a deep breath and remain calm, Internet.
Curtis and Dylan are doing the usual Coastal Crew things in the video; the same style and amplitude are there, and a casual observer might not even notice the whirring of the motor, or even the bright green LED power light visible in some of the shots. But I can't, and I suspect that you can't either, ignore the fact that they're throwing down that familiar Coastal Crew panache with the help of some pedal assistance.
They say that you're not supposed to talk about sex, politics, religion, or fight club with people you don't know. We should probably add e-bikes to that list, as it often turns into a shitstorm of, well, shitty comments anytime the topic comes up. Judging by a recent post on his
personal Instagram account, the Coastal Crew's Dylan Dunkerton found out that saying anything supportive of e-bikes is a bit like using a stick to poke a really angry bear, and your stick is way too short to be at a safe distance away from its claws. But we're going to talk about them again because everyone's favorite B.C. freeride pairing just released the above video of themselves riding e-bikes. Yeah, I'm as conflicted as you probably are.
Self-styled "pure" drivers recoil when the topic of autonomous cars comes up, but no amount of hate from what is a very small but also very vocal minority of drivers is going to stop computers from eventually giving us at least the option of having them control our vehicles. I fear that it's a similar situation with pedal-assist mountain bikes, too, even if thousands of riders are kicking and screaming about it. Case in point: I posted up a poll awhile back
asking Pinkbike readers first if they thought riding an e-bike on singletrack was actually mountain biking, and also whether or not they were considering an e-bike for themselves in the near future. The results of those two questions were, somewhat predictably, about as lopsided as I've ever seen one of our polls turn out. To the first question, over 11,500 people said that no, an e-bike isn't a mountain bike, while just over 4,000 believe the opposite and nearly 2,000 were still undecided.
Even more telling, just under 15,000 people said that they weren't considering buying an e-bike in the next twelve months, while 2,751 were at least mulling it over and 1,533 people were still on the fence. A lot of people are buying e-bikes, however, but it seems as though not many of them appear to be too vocal about it here on Pinkbike.
As many non-believers as there were chiming in on those polls, the numbers represent an extremely small sliver of mountain bikers in the world. In fact, major brands have told me that e-bikes sales are surpassing combined mountain bike sales numbers, which makes me simultaneously sad and mystified. Regardless, rather than not share what is actually a pretty damn sweet video, or maybe worse, simply share it on its own, I thought I'd reach out to Dylan Dunkerton himself to see what he thinks of all this battery banter. Interview below.
The Coastal Crew's Dylan Dunkerton Talks E-BikesMike Levy: It looks like you're pretty comfortable on an e-bike, and you're riding trails that you've personally built for non-pedal assist bikes. What would you say to someone who questions whether riding an e-bike on singletrack is actually mountain biking? Dylan Dunkerton: It's an interesting idea - in some people's opinions because of the pedal assisted motor it suddenly makes the bike not a mountain bike. That’s like saying removing the motor from a dirt bike suddenly makes it a downhill mountain bike. We all know that’s just not the case. The Levo is a mountain bike with a motor, simple as that. It’s a different experience going up, but it's still a mountain bike going down. That being said, I do feel very strongly that there is a world of difference between assist and a bike with a high-powered motor and a throttle.
Levy: Out of all the bikes at your disposal, would an e-bike ever be your first choice for the trail shown in your latest video? Dunkerton: Actually, yes, for a lot of that it would be, and some of it wouldn’t. But that doesn’t mean I'd shy away from hitting anything on the Levo. The reality is now with that bike I can get myself to many more trails on one ride, and because of this I end up riding a wider range of trails and features on that bike. It's capable in many areas, but it could never replace a well set up downhill bike when things get going fast and features get bigger.
Levy: What would you say to a group of riders who show up at the Coast Gravity Park and use their e-bikes to access the trails rather than the shuttle service? Dunkerton: Well, it does happen, and we welcome anyone with an e-bike to the park, but we do not allow them to climb up rather than use the shuttle. It is just not safe to have vehicle and bicycle traffic operating on the same road. But we are aware that a lot of people, e-bike or not, would prefer to be able to get some climbing in. At some point in the future, we will be installing a climbing trail at the park.
Levy: Can you describe how an e-bike feels to ride on a trail like the one in your video? Dunkerton: It took me about a week to adapt to the feeling of having that much more weight down low in one area. At first, it felt a little unusual, much harder to pull up and manual, but at the same time it excelled at cornering like no other bike I’ve ridden, thanks to the low center of gravity. As far as how much faster it goes, once up to 'trail speed' it’s the same as any other bike; it doesn’t allow you to scream down your favorite trail twice as fast, but what it does do is help you pick speed back up after you make a mistake. But don’t try to wheelie drop off a slick ladder bridge. When it comes to jumping, it has a slightly less poppy feel, it likes to stay low, and it's easy to whip out but not so easy to bring the whip back. After the initial week of riding, I switched back to my Demo 8 and did some park laps. And to my surprise, it was a smooth transition, and if anything it made me a stronger rider because now my trail and DH bikes feel so light and easy to throw around. It's insane.
Levy: Would you say an e-bike is an advantage in any way on a descent? Can you go faster, be in more control, or feel more confident because of the pedal assist? Dunkerton: In my opinion, the only advantage is the way it corners. I am blown away with how the bike handles due to the majority of the weight being down around the pedals. I'm more confident and more in control riding this bike than I ever expected. That first ride was really the moment where Curt and I realized, “holy shit, this bike really is shreddable.” It was not something we expected, and it made us want to show people that this isn’t just a goofy fat tire bike for lazy people. With the right set up, it's capable of much more than people may think.
Levy: Are there any setup differences between your standard bike and an e-bike given the pedal assist and the added weight of a motor and battery? Dunkerton: I didn’t do any setup changes directly because of the weight. I set my Levo up the way I would set up any of my other trail bikes, with the exception of downhill casing tires instead of folding beads. We both went with a Butcher/Hillbilly 2.5'' combo. The Hillbilly in the back really helps on steep climbs to hold traction, and the Butcher is always the choice front tire for all of my bikes. We went with 2.5'' because of the rim that is spec’d on the Levo has a 34mm inner width. Although this rim is a little on the wide side, it allowed us to run much lower pressures than usual. We both went by feel and not numbers, and ended up in the low 20’s for tire pressure. That is really low for people who weigh in and around 200lbs and ride aggressively. For suspension pressure, it stayed the same as we run on our regular Stumpjumpers.
Levy: In North America, and especially in the United States, e-bikes are a contentious subject partly because of the trail access issues they can bring up. What are your thoughts on the use of a bike that has the potential to cause access issues related to all bikes, motorized or not? Dunkerton: This is a subject that I'm not too comfortable getting into, but I do have one comment I'd like to get out there. In my opinion, before any of these issues around trail access can be addressed, there needs to be a line drawn between pedal assist and non-pedal assist. From my experience, anything with a throttle has the potential to cause a lot of damage to trail access, trail networks, and other users, whether it be a motorbike or a mountain bike.
Levy: Many Pinkbike readers take no issue with shuttling up the mountain in a vehicle, but that seems to be at odds with how a lot of the same people seem to have a problem with pedal assist bikes. As a rider who runs a shuttle assisted bike park, do you feel the two methods are comparable? Dunkerton: Well, the bottom line is that vehicles are regulated, insured, the roads are legal and government funded. E-bikes are not regulated, not insured, and most trails are built illegally. This gives anyone ammunition to find fault with e-bikes. I don’t think anyone shuttling up to the trail really cares if someone rides up and down the road on an e-bike; it's once they cross into the trail network where the two parties differ in opinion and issues arise. When it comes to comparing the two as a way to get to the top, it is not comparable. With the assist, you will be slower than a vehicle, and you will be getting your heart rate up.
Levy: Given some of the critical feedback that you'll likely receive on this video, I have to wonder why you'd want to do this. Straight up: was producing an e-bike video in your contract with Specialized? Was this a matter of ''you have to do this'' or a matter of the Coastal Crew wanting to do this? Dunkerton: No, we are under no contractual obligation to ride this bike whatsoever, nor were we pressured to create media around it. Despite what everyone may think, we aren’t padding out bank accounts just because we are riding an e-bike. The gist of this whole project is the fact that we were just as skeptical as everyone else. I believe all bikes are fun, and for me, there was no denying the fact that the Levo would be a ton of fun to putt around town to and from the beer store – honestly, that’s all we planned on using it for. But now, after riding one the way we want to ride, we have realized that’s not just some stupid gimmick. People have had it crammed down their throats that e-bikes can climb very well. No one needs to know that anymore. They need to feel that their ride down won’t be compromised by the added weight of the motor.
Has the Coastal Crew broken new ground by riding (and filming) their e-bikes the way they do, or have they only broken the hearts of their fans? Go easy, Internet, and keep the claws down.
The new 27.5/Boost/Metric shock is the Ebike. Its another way to sell new bikes to people who already own bikes. Every company will get on board soon enough. Plus an Ebike has the built in obsolescence of a battery that is finite and by the time it dies the it won't be economically sane to not replace the whole bike.
Whether or not the MTB community gains or loses is a question I'm not sure the answer to.
drink the koolaid.
defend all ya want.
I'm not sure about the whole for or against trail access issue but I can see it being more fuel to the fire for certain groups. It might actually cause a stalemate. Yes, they could potentially do more damage if the trails aren't built properly but if they are and aren't causing more damage, then why is it an issue? If you got together with the people with Ebikes then its more BIKERS joined together with a larger voice and better numbers.
If you shun them out, you are only f*cking yourself really.
There aren't many ebike riders around where I live. The ones that use them, really need them. They have some sort of disabilty that makes it so actual mountain biking is out of the question. A bit of help with an assist system, and they don't have to sit at home being depressed and getting no exercise and not enjoying life.
these pinkbikers complaining are missing the human side of the equation. It's sickening.
but a what cost? and to who? and to what user group?
there is nothing herd like in staying 3 steps ahead of the people who will ruin trail access by shutting things down because these ebikes have motors.
all we are saying is lets not 'go there' with these ebikes, because alot of us already know how land owners and land stewards will react to these 'motorcycles'. 'motorcycles' is their(owners and stewards) word, not mine. its their(owners and stewards) perception those of us who have seen these type of issues before in other sports we are concerned about. we already know how the general public and the land owners and stewards will react to these ebikes.....so why even go down the road?
Is this just speculation? it sounds like speculation when you say "potential to f*ck up"
You are trying to put a blanket statement on all land owners and stewards. That doesn't work. You don't know how they will react but you can inform them.
We are already down the road. We need to be proactive and find a way to make it work for everyone. People who need ebikes don't deserve to be at the back of the bus lol
i only ride park. ridden over a dozen parks in my fourwheeler.
so why do i give two craps about trail access on crown and private land?
because the dudes/dudettes that started this whole scene, and have been a part of it for over 40 years, don't have to have their trails taken away or limited because of the e bikes.
i'll never ride their trails, nor would i want to ride most of em really,....but they should be able to ride their trails without hassles of shut downs or dangers of ebikes climbing up and dh trail.
ebikes will cause more problems than they will solve.
you are right that it is speculation but I dont think anyone would argue that losing access to any of our favorite trails would be negative.
ebikes will cause more problems than they will solve. = with proper knowledge, I can't see why it would be an issue? What is the worst that could happen? Will all MTB trails get shutdown if one ebike cruises through one trail?
How many a*sholes skid through berms and make brake bumps and ride on the sides of trails causing erosion and trail widening?
I would worry about those guys drinking beer, smoking weed with jacked up trucks doing stupid shit on trails in front of their bros first.
how would a couple of older dudes cruising down or up trails make them unrideable?
Yeah you are totally right! I should be looking forward to my regular bike being classified exactly the same as anything else with two wheels and an electric motor, because whats the worst that could happen!?
But imagine what happens if a couple of your mates buy them, and they zoom up the climbs leaving you puffing away, how long until you give in? Then how long until everyone in your riding group gets sick of being left behind and buys one? The chain reaction will come and spread quickly once the tipping point is reached.
I'm not saying whether or not this is good or bad, but just like 27.5/Boost/Press fit BB/Metric shocks, it'll come whether everyone likes or wants it or not.
Why the hell would we even ask the question?
And I speculate that many trail systems will just adopt a 'don't see don't tell' unofficial policy initially though I recall reading somewhere that Jackson Hole is already restricting these on their lovely network of trails?
knarf-dog, do what you want up in BC, I hope to make it up there sometime and see you on the trails. I won't even bitch if you're on an Ebike.
But when you come down here to ride in Utah, please leave that sh*t in Canada.
Sincerely,
Me and everyone else in the state of Utah.
Sorry knarf, I digress!
Moab trails were founded by dirt bikes and jeeps and so we all share them freely. Ebikes welcome, I guess. Just keep them out of northern Utah, eh!
The funny thing is that with the speed limit on these things, most of your downhill riding would be like the old 40 lbs DH bike days...
For me the reason I like downhill at a park is that I can get in 10 to 12 DH sections in a day. However, if I have to ride up Smith Creek in Kelowna for one downhill section, it's a 2 to 3 hour commitment and I'm too exhausted to go again. Therefore the lift at the park helps me to get the equivalent of a year's worth of DH in one day.
With that in mind if the E-bike helps a rider to get more downhill sections in a day a month or a season ... why not?
Although I beleive mtb and e-mtb are two different animals, pointing fingers and calling names wont get us anywhere. Thats something you learn at elementary school.
So please people, instead of throwing some oil in the fire, maybe you should convince your LBS to let some grumpy anti-mtb demo an ebike? They might see that it really isnt that big of a deal.
I won`t be hearing the bad mouthing when Im flying up the hills at 15mph!!!
And will ebike riders do more trail maintenance since theyre riding more laps? Doubt it. Seems like "more fun, less work" mentality is exactly what the ebike appeals to in the first place.
But if you build your own trails or ride in motorized areas, have at er
Exactly!
What you, I, or anyone else on PB thinks about E-bikes is irrelevant when compared to what the trail access land managers think.
Vernon Felton's article hinted about trail poaching versus concerted efforts at working with land managers to define access; and I have no trouble whatsoever in calling out anyone who takes their E-bike, trail poaches and then tells others to shut up because they haven't tried one, whilst land managers look on and consider the next access meeting agenda.
People have spent years, maybe decades, working to get trail access for more riders in more areas and e-bike riders are in no way going to make a positive contribution to the negotiations.
If we are only trying to have a louder voice then why haven't we already joined up with our mortorized two wheeled bros on MX bikes for trail access? Obviously we have tried to distance MTB from MX for trail access. Mountain mopeds blur the line too much and move us back in the wrong direction.
And chew on this for a moment. Electric assist mountain mopeds allow for faster average speeds thus allowing the user to ride more trail miles in the same amount of time/effort as if they were on MTB right? Now, what does more damage to a trail, me riding my MTB one time down the trail in an hour, or me riding it down the same trail 2x in an hour?
I think the logic is pretty easy to follow that even without regular throttles, mountain mopeds will do more damage to the trails.
Even after riding one, which I have, I'm convinced these things don't belong on our hard earned, fought for, singletrack trails.
Pull the wool off your heads people! I mean come on! Cant you see where this is going!?
It won't be long before people are tweeking these things and doing 30mph up hill.
Bumped into a guy years ago that had built his own electric powered DH bike, an old Bighit, the motor and battery pack were around the size of two water bottles and the thing f*cking ripped.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kizaX1VnT0
I'm not against the existence of e-bikes. I'm not against people enjoying themselves on an e-bike. I'm not arguing that an e-bike is probably a shit ton of fun to ride.
NONE of that matters though.
What matters is the fundamental change of state that occurs when you add a motor to something that was once without. Rowboat -> Motorboat ; Bike -> Motorbike
What I am against, is this feeble dishonest desperate attempt to coerce people into accepting and believing and acting on the false principal that these should be considered the same thing as a human powered bicycle. And they are attempting to do it every which way they know how. And they are attempting to slip it through this gray area by climbing aboard the back of the BICYCLE industry and all of its access.
"Think of the kittens and the disabled and the elderly and your achy knees and the starving children. Its only a supplement. There isn't a throttle. Think of the pros you have always admired! Look at them getting rad just like old times! See, its still a bike!"
Remember I said I am not Against the existence of e-bikes? I'm not. Why would I be? I mean really. We get around with and depend on engines and motors every which way all day every day. They certainly have their place, and people certainly have the right to decide that for themselves.
But these need to be classified for what they are, and approached from the ground up as such by standing on their own two electrified wheels. They do not belong in the same category as a bicycle. Because they ARE fundamentally different due to one very important distinction. A MOTOR.
The manufacturers are not advertising them as motor bikes. They are advertising them as... a mountain bike... With Benefits!!! Yeahh! Thats the right angle! same as your old bike, but now with benefits!
We are their target market.
Think of how flat and lost their advertising campaign would look if they were competing with other two wheeled motorized vehicles. "Go slower! Do extra work to get there! Come take a futuristic retro nostalgic ride with us back to the birthplace of the motorcycle, but this time with a battery!"
This. More than ever. Is all about expanding market share and driving sales. But make no mistake. They are not selling bikes.
Metacomet, you make some great points in a very accessible way; something that the readership of PB would be interested in I believe. It is a shame your comment is buried under a huge array of comments and unlikely to be seen by many who would find your points interesting.
I was wondering if either
a) you would you be interested in expanding your opinion in a longer piece for PB, if you and they agreed?
b) PB would be interested in giving Metacomet a platform (possibly through a Q&A type piece)? Possibly as part of a "We asked (n) number of people in the MTB industry, both producers and consumers, their take on..."
I for one would be very glad to see something along those lines. PB is often used very effectively by interested parties as a tool to promote X, Y and Z. It would be great to see more of the consumers voices in conceived and created pieces more often, rather than having to sift though the detritus of the comments to find the gold.
Dave
Sure why not. I think that could be pretty interesting and beneficial.
Guess Norbs jumped ship when he heard the ebikes were coming #youhearditherefirst
selling your soul to the devil, or trying to make a living from your passion?
I can guarantee you that the environmentalists who are trying to shut mountain bikes out of trails aren't going to be concerned about the nuances between pedal assist and bikes with a throttle - either way about it, it's a motor. We don't need to be blurring the line between mountain bikes and dirt bikes (and I'm saying that as someone who has owned dirt bikes and thinks they're awesome).
I'm surprised at the amount of whining going on. So much negativity and hate over a bicycle w a motor for pedal assist.
Is the world going to end now? I thought it was already over when 29ers came around and everyone hated them? or when 1x sram gear fist came out? what about 27.5? or tubless tires? or electronic shifting? or dropper posts!!! LOL at the haters of all new tech that adopt it a few months later.
Do they have motors yes, but they also need to be pedalled to move.
In Canada anything under 750watt is classed as a bicycle and should be thought of as such.
My issue is to many people crying wolf without having any knowledge or experience which will draw attention to the issue others.
Bike community needs to stick together, make a stand and continue to fight together instead of crapping on each other for riding a bike that is different than the norm.
This is an example of the bike community sticking together and defending what we have worked hard to achieve and are still fighting for. The USA land mangers already are aware of e-bikes and have begun to threaten trails at this early stage. Watt power ratings have zero affect whether they are 100w or 1500w. They don't see them as benign and they have all the power regardless of our opinions on them. If bikers irresponsibly ignore 'no motor' signs and/or act like a*sholes with e-bikes and threaten our access or get trails closed to all bikers, we as non-ebike riders have every damn right to crap on them and point the finger.
Manufacturers are in the business to make money. It is user groups responsibility as to where to ride.
To the note of me calling the land mangers and/or the equestrians specifically out on our blog, maybe they need to see another perspective. We too often get accused of living with blinders on. Well, they can and are often just as guilty
Bottom line, ebikes threaten our hard fought access regardless of them being a true threat or not. I, and many of the riders I know, will vocally call them out when ever we can. I also won't call the rangers, land mangers , equestrians a*sholes to their faces. However, I will vent on this forum to a degree.
Their argument will be: e-bikes move faster, and more quietly than any other user group. This will 1) increase negative interactions with other trail users, and 2) increase negative interactions with wildlife. Here in Montana, they'll go on to say how it'll specifically increase negative interactions with grizzly bears, which are classified as a "threatened" species. They'll argue that those negative interactions with a threatened species warrant closing the trail to any wheeled vehicle, motorized or not. And if the Forest Service ignores them, they'll sue, and more often than not, federal judges have been siding with the enviros on these issues.
Motorized users are getting their access cut even faster than mountain bikes (despite shitloads of money in the moto industry from Honda, Yamaha, etc.). The last thing mountain bikers need is to corner themselves into some weird gray area where some of the bikes have motors and some don't. If people want to ride e-bikes on moto-legal trails, then more power to them. I'll happily fight for their continued access. But if they want to start riding non-moto legal trails because they're acting like their e-bike is just a regular mountain bike, I'll be the first one to throw them under the bus. I've spent way too much of my free time fighting to protect legitimate mountain bike access for some guy on his shiny new e-bike to come along and f*ck it up.
Trump: president
Coastal Crew: riding E-bikes
Thanks 2016
and the list goes on
They're hooked on mtb.
Your comment of towing him was obviously meant to brag about yourself and had no relevance to the video or debates thus the sarcastic reply.
Skateboarding does not have this problem.
It's taken us decades to get where we are with tenuous acceptance from hiking and equestrians groups, and the industry seems to have no qualms throwing us to the wolves with these motorized devices. Make no mistakes, when more and more unacceptable user conflict and trail sustainability issues begin to crop up when these become popular, regular non-motorized mountain bikers will pay the price, and where will the industry be then to support us?
I'm actively involved in my local club, my 3rd 2 year term, I don't advocate for motorized recreation, I don't help plan and build trails for motorized recreation, lots of people very much like me will not be interested in defending or fighting for these things as they have a very real potential to undermine decades of hard work to gain access and build more trails. The e-bike industry is trying to make money off the hard work of lots of people while not addressing or even attempting to deal with the very real problems a lot of clubs have with these devices.
Anyone on here arguing any other reason for not allowing them on trails is just playing devils advocate using the arguments that the people who object to ALL mountain bike riding like the Sierra Club will use. While its good to do this so you're prepared for those objections at land mgmt board meetings none of the arguments I've seen on here hold any weight or are backed by anything other than wild speculation and couch potato math.
are there any parallel scenarios for the hiking world? I imagine they would be up in arms if swarms of people started trying to complete the AT or PCT on segways or those hoverboard devices. . . .or maybe this has already started happening? haha.
For us it's actually PSW, not PNW ... While we will always have a bromance with the US, we are still sovereign.
I agree with the flavor of your assessment though. I recall 'debating' with someone while riding trails on Mt Doug in Victoria; pedestrian was trying to tell me that mountain biking on those trails was akin to destroying the environment... ignoring the fact that housing developments and a golf course surround the area. Conveniently ignoring that a lot of those trails were started by dirt bikes way back in the day. Funny how interest groups focus on getting things just the way they want. I guess that includes us MTBers too. Hmmm, maybe I need time for some self-reflection...
But still, I didn't read the fact that it was e-bikes at first. I watched the video and thought it looked slower and more boring than their usual videos. Then when I saw it was e-bikes, I warched it again and realized they can't get those things off the ground. They're both yanking as hard as they can to leave the ground. Most of that video they can't pop simple stuff. So, we're back to 1998 boat anchor bikes.
I'm sorry, but if you bring an e-bike into Pisgah National Forest as your ride for the day, you're not accomplishing anytthing. If you're getting old (which I am) and can't get as far as the next guy with your own 2 legs, just ACCEPT IT!
The world doesn't owe you extra miles and you shouldn't be allowed to BUY extra miles with an e-bike. As it is, we're lucky regular mountain bikes haven't been booted out of the forests. E-bikes stand to get ALL knobbies blocked from access.
Bullseye!
Where is the dividing line between a light weight electric motorcycle, a 'pedal assist' electric motorcycle, and a pedal assist e-bike?
I think this is a really lazy way to avoid a serious question about e-bikes. Clearly he supports them somewhat, but I don't think the Coastal Crew just get to take their advertising check and ignore the implications of the material produced.
I think the Coastal Crew does a lot of great things, and the riding in this video is impressive, but it makes avoid a discussion isn't going to help anyone.
I guess the long term plan is for Specialized to become an eBike company and get out of mountain bikes. Because there is no future in mountain biking if these catch on. They will destroy the trails and ultimately be banned everywhere.
Glad to see the same cheerleaders here posting the same asto-turfed drivel about how great ebikes are have showed up in force.
Why does mountain biking have to be accessible? Why do we have to make it easy? Why do we need more people doing it?
^ This. Exactly this.
www.pinkbike.com/news/opinion-it-should-be-hard-shouldnt-it-2014.html
It could never replace my Enduro bike, but it's another kind of bike, I have a DJ-Bike, Enduro, DH-Bike, Roadbike... why not an E-Bike?
Fortunately, i think this obviously semi scripted sellout of a clip failed to bypass the gag factor of most readers here.
Don't take me wrong- i go bananas for Coastal Crew clips!!! However (not surprisingly) this ebike section is probably the weakest and most mellow clip they ever produced. I appreciate the fact that they need to play the marketing game for their sponsor, but i just don't buy it...
go ahead, downvote me to hell
2. Do they have a monopoly on fun? NO WAY
3. Do we need them? NO
4. Is there a reasonable risk that they will result in limitations on overall MTB trail access: YES
5. Is the overall risk worth it? Not from my perspective
I suspect that their profitability ensures their survival, so we had better start thinking up ways to help policy makers distinguish these ever-more-blurred lines to ensure we can all get along.
Heck, there is even the slippery slope of "Allowed on gravel roads only". Well, guess what, then e erroneous will just push to get all trails turned to gravel so they can have more access for theit e-bikes.
Oh, and F*ck ebikes
if these creatures hatch and start to multiply, it will destroy our sport as we know it.
Well, In a nutshell
Probably because most are not “mountain bike enthusiasts” of the type that read about mountain biking.
“…major brands have told me that e-bikes sales are surpassing combined mountain bike sales numbers, which makes me simultaneously sad and mystified.”
Mystification is only warranted if those are REPLACING large numbers of regular mountain bike sales. But what would those people have been buying if e-bikes didn’t exist? Carbon DH bikes? (I don’t think so.) $500 hardtails?
“they zoom up the climbs leaving you puffing away, how long until you give in?”
Never - because it would tempt me no more than if they were zooming up the climbs on dirt bikes.
I have an ebike for commuting to work (250km x 3600m vert per week) and I can say they are super heavy and will never replace a good traditional mountain bike... you'll run out of battery before you get a good epic ride in and you'll sacrifice your ride quality immensely. So quite your belly-aching and go ride your bike!
Admittedly...I considered buying a Turbo at one point...I thought it would be cool to commute back and forth to work since there are a couple 55 mph roads with minimal shoulder. Then I was told it was 7K. I drove down the street to the moto dealership and bought a KTM Duke 690 for a grand more.
To each his own. I think these types of bikes are more appropriate for commuting because cars are faster and bigger than you. I do not think they are appropriate for trail riding. I think these types of bikes open the door for inexperienced out of shape riders to ride shared access trails at speeds they are to inexperienced to control. I'm not talking about Dylan or Curtis...they could ride anything with 2 wheels better than 99% of the ppl on here.
In my opinion, which doesn't mean anything, if the use of these becomes more widespread, it's only a matter of time before we start to lose trail access...and I don't think it will be because of erosion concerns...I think it is going to be due to someone going through a mid life crisis, buying one of these things and hurting either themselves or someone else then attempting to sue the land owner...or maybe specialized. Once the lawsuits start the trail access will stop (least here in the states because, that is what every stupid a-hole here does when they f up...try and sue someone for their stupidity).
I'm not yielding to anyone with a motorbike on non-motorized trails, ever.
If you have a motor, you should be hitting bigger shit.
Spec' applied pressure or they didn't, you felt it either way because one way or another, especially with a company like Spec, you're doin' it, or you're out.
change the subject "ebike" in your sentences to "freeride" and later "enduro" and later "650b" and here you go, you have a time travel from 1999 to 2014.
guys grow up. its all about fun. and these toys can be a lot of fun!
I have nothing against battery powered cars (I do love hybrid racing cars and such) but on a mountain bike? Nah
You guys are sound like this. Lets short circuit this attitude to anything that is "different."
www.facebook.com/michaeldorian/posts/10154877896191383
Is my fat friend mountain biking?
If you answered Yes, then riding an e-bike up and down same trail is also mountain biking. Don't change the definition just so you can win your little internet and trailhead arguments.
I understand if you don't like e-bikes because your ego can't handle getting passed on an uphill by my fat friend; but don't take it out on a old-timey mountain biker who had hip surgery and just wants to ride his bike, like you and me.
"F him! Tough luck, fat boy!" is that what you're implying?
few brews in but for real e bikes are only going to benefit delusions. My opinion.
I came across two major points against e-bikes in these comment sections.
1. They'd be for lazy unfit people with too much money and lack of skill. If that were true, the same could be said for an efficient lightweight bike. I haven't heard anyone say that about these.
2. They'd damage the trails. I'd be interested in some research to back that up. Compare it to these super light gearings of late (SRAM Eagle and third party expander sprockets) and see which cause more erosion on technical climbs.
What I would see as an advantage is that when you go to big steep terrain with a buddy, you don't need to take turns shuttling. You can both ride up as well as down. And you can go places where shuttling simply isn't possible.
That said, it is not for me. I do see the advantages for sure but if I'd have more money, there'd be other stuff I'd upgrade first before even thinking of an e-bike and expensive battery replacements. And for my fitness and trails, it simply doesn't make sense.
The biggest drawback is the battery, a big day out in the woods would probably mean a couple of reloads, which take pretty long and require a loading station, which isn't a common sight in the woods.
Interestingly as comments got more like those in previous e-bike topics, I got more downvotes
It is similar to when I was riding a mountain unicycle (MUni) at the hiking trails in the dunes. As an unpowered vehicle that can't be defined as a bicycle (as it has fewer than two wheels) a unicycle by law should be considered a pedestrian. So I could ride these nice technical hiking trails, or so I thought. Greeted everyone politely, adapted my pace if I was passing people and dismounted if it was too tight or to not scare the bigger animals on the trails. Greeted the rangers, still no problem. Pace is similar to a fit trail runner, trail erosion is minimal as you only roll and it is hard to sustain a skid. Have been doing that for two years until I was stopped by a ranger on a trail section with no one else around. He said I wasn't allowed to ride there. I explained I should be considered a pedestrian (similar to a wheelchair or child stroller which technically ride as well) so I should be fine on these hiking trails. There were no signs it was prohibited and there trail damage wasn't even close to what a hiker would cause. He said the road laws don't apply to these trails and they can't prohibit everything separately. But as I should always follow orders by a ranger, it was prohibited right there. Not for something explicable or predictable, but just because it was different from what he'd seen before.
So that's what we're having here. We know that light gearing is more likely to spin out on climbs and cause erosion as such, but PB loves Eagle. But for trail erosion it really doesn't matter if you're getting 200W more through electronic pedal assist or because you're a stronger rider. As I mentioned earlier, I'd like to see a comparison. Most likely to cause erosion is pushing your bike up a slippery steep bit.
The Levo comes stock with a Revalation fork and NX group and chimes in at $6200 retail CAD. Unless this is your only bike, not too many people are going to be considering adding this as a second bike. With the added weight, there will need to be a burlier version of this (w/Pike or Lyrik, better drive train, dropper, carbon version obvs). So a version for someone who rides hard will clock minimum 10K. This pushes it out of reach for most.
Part of the reason bikes have gotten so much better is because they are lighter and stiffer then they have ever been to push over terrain. The weight of e-bikes sets that scale back about 10 years. Assuming these are 45? lbs, they can't handle as well on tech downs.
All fine on the access part of things, wanting to ride longer and farther, but the idea of allowing any kind of a motorized assist will just allow other aspects of motors (throttle) to slowly creep in down the line.
To me, it's just another way to push a 10K price point. There's enough bikes like that. Bikes need to get cheaper if companies want to sell more. Giant produces great entry level bikes at around $3K or less (look at the 2017 Trance 2, outstanding bike for the price). That will get way more people into the sport then trying to get as much money out of a bike purchase as possible.
The same thing is true with mtb vs. e-mtb! e-bikers can conceivably go uphill or over flat ground significantly faster. With things the way they are now it's not a huge difference. But add a few hundred (or thousand) watts to that pedal assist and suddenly e-bikes are using the trails in a significantly different way than mtb's, and conflict can arise.
Just thinking about why we have the feelings we do about "whether an e-mtb is a mtb." There is a dividing line, somewhere.
Your choice I made mine long ago.
Suffer its worth it.
mak-man, I'm sorry that you're feeling sick. Just because we don't want Ebikes on our trails doesn't mean we disdain people with disabilities. Poor form, man. WTF?
"Man, you're just one of those f*cking PURIST mountain bikers! You bastard! Building trails and communities, donating to IMBA and STC, pulling over for horsies and hikers, earning your turns, and of course HATING everyone who has a disability as well as bikes with motors, err motorbikes, err Ebikes." Yeah man, that's every one of us for sure.
I'll be boastful and state that I am a very passionate and experienced 2 wheel rider/athlete around my community. I work in the industry, I race moto, I race EWS events, I race Word Cups, I teach and coach new and aspiring riders, I build trail, I stand on advocacy boards and I could go on... More than anything these days I seek to grow and share the sport with as many people as possible as it has given so much to me.
Now on to the topic at hand. I want nothing to do with "eBikes" on my mtb trails. If it has a throttle it doesn't belong on non-motorized trails. Now for the kicker, I own a Turbo Levo. Yes, I do. I spent my hard earned money on this bike, and I love it. Puts a smile on my face every time I ride it. How did I justify this? After my first ride I was blown away with the technology, the doors it opened and the difficulty I had with arguing against it. Sure... you could call it "drinking the cool-aid" but the experience of riding a Class 1 pedal assist truly makes you quickly realize it opens more doors than it closes.
A mtb with a throttle has no interest to me. I've ridden them and they're trying way too hard to be a moto, which they'll never be. When you ride a class 1, you get a mountain bike experience. Not a moto experience.
Just like Dylan said in this interview: "It’s a different experience going up, but it's still a mountain bike going down." To me, my Levo allows me to ride more trail in less time(which is getting harder to come by it seems, especially after a major knee surgery), it keeps me fresher for the descents(which is 95% why I climb), makes me a faster descender(awesome training tool), it's honestly less impactful on the trail surface IMO(for reasons I could explain), the added weight adds stability (great for beginners) and it makes makes climbing extremely fun. I own a 150 travel non-assisted bike and enjoy riding it just as much my Levo. My choice of which bike I grab largely depends on where I'm riding, how long I have to ride and who I'm riding with(how vocal the other riders are).
Some awesome quotes I've heard after people ride this bike. "It's the first colored television of the mountain bike world". "It's like inward singing... now you're rocking 100% of the time!"(Tenacious D quote)
If you go on long rides(over 20miles, especially with ample vertical) you can't run it at 100% motor output and battery power. Which brings you even closer to the human average. Class 1 pedal assists are not superhuman, they just bring you to an elite level with less effort. Opening doors to beginners, the disabled and athletes alike. It fills the gap between you and world cup'r. Is that cheating? If it is cheating at having fun and enabling people then I guess so...
The people who seem to be most up in arms about this new technology are our most passionate and purist riders. Without them I'm not sure we would have an issue here. The experience of riding one changed my opinion. Don't knock it till you try it, which some people don't seem to have the guts to do as they're afraid of what it might mean. Change is hard... I get it, but sometimes we need to embrace it when the positives out way the negatives. Any equestrian, hiker, dog walker or other non-biker wouldn't be able to notice that these types of bikes are any different than a common "Bio-Ped".
There's a lot to be figured out still from labeling standards, tampering restrictions(which I have no interest in doing as it defeats the purpose in my mind), and land access ordinances. Class 1 is already labeled as a non-motorized vehicle by the DOT and CPSC. Just need more land managers and both city and state entities to adopt the federal definition as well. It's a good thing in my book. Pedal on!
It's not an "e"-mountain bike(cycle)...or "pedal-assist" bike(cycle). it's a motorcycle...period.
If you aren't allowed to ride a motorized anything on your trails, then you aren't allowed to ride an "e-mtb"....or whatever convoluted term you want to coin.
Just because you could, doesn't mean you should.
Long live Aaron chase !
Plus all of you tards bashing E bikes Have never ridden one. Or a dirt bike for that matter..
Love the analogy: to say a e bike is like a motorcycle is to say removing the engine of a dirt bike makes a DH rig...
LOL
Stupid kids are just mad they can't afford an e bike (as I am too :-()
Mountain biking is a SPORT, unless you shuttle trails or ride a bike park, you gotta earn your turns ....
There is something wrong with the world we live in.
Kick me in the balls madly if you ever see me riding an e-mountain bike. I'll be pissed off if any of my friends buy one someday.
Good shredding boys though, can't deny it.
What makes you people so rageous about? You still have a choice, don't you?! If you don't like it, just stay the hell away from them. But don't judge or hate on people who like to ride them. That world full of hateress makes me sick!!
Just imagine one of these things with 200mm travel front and back... should see some interesting freeride videos with them then!
Firstly try one and you will realize the they are definitely not a motorcycle. You're gonna pedal and you're gonna sweat. You're not going to go much faster than you usually do going UP but you will go further and gain more vertical with less effort. You will descend at the same speed as you would on a trail bike.
If you're into bikes your going to like riding one. It's different for sure but it's damn fun.
The impact on a trail is the same as any long travel trail/ DH / CC skinny tire bike.
The flip side is that, clearly, they have a major PR problem. The negative perception is undeniable. Once people realize it's an -bike then it's the devil. Most don't tough.
You have to be reasonable. If you riding area is patrolled and has lots of hikers that are Sierra Club members then you should likely not ride an e-bike.
If your riding area (like mine) is a bunch of fire roads where all single track is illegal anyway and everybody poaches (while the rangers tune a blind eye) then I think cautious use is o.k.
Differentiating between a PEDAL ASSIST bike and an E-motorbike is going to be a challenge.
Rules are already in place though in the US. In America a class 1 e-bike like the LEVO is limited to a motor powered speed of 20 mph with motor wattage of = 750 watts. This makes is legal to ride where regular bikes are able to ride.
Don't just hate on what you don't know/ haven't tried/ can't afford....which I know pretty much sums up the comment section of PB for the most part.
"we do not allow them (E-MTBers) to climb up rather than use the shuttle. It is just not safe to have vehicle and bicycle traffic operating on the same road." It's not safe to have cars and some EBikers sharing a forest road? Riding in the same direction? What a lame excuse, it's what riders do everywhere in the world whether it be in the forests or in the cities. with that argument forestry could kick us out of every area we don't own ourselves.
In fact, it shows that the coastal crew is just as worried as everyone else about E-MTBing having a huge impact on trail access, raising the need for trail maintenance (also in their park...) and undermining the acceptance of MTBers among hikers because the numbers of riders on trails will multiply and not all people need to earn their spurs and meters of trails any more the way it used to be.
www.facebook.com/AlpineElements/videos/10154562320118844
Oh wait, e-bikes?! So conflicted right now.
if people who own land with trails on that done want ebikes on they can stop them, like they stop motorbikes. those that are a bit more open minded and realise they wont cause any issues will let them on. its not a hard thing to understand.
oh and while we are talking about it, how many people who are bitching about ebikes on their trails, have ridden their bike where they shouldnt have. pretty sure most of you will have ridden a cheeky footpath or built a secret trail where you shouldnt really build.
oh and those saying peddle assist are just like electric motos, maybe if you compare one of the ebikes with the ktm efreeride you might notice one or two differences lol.
I don't really think the E bike thing is for me personally, and I certainly couldn't justify the money to have one in my stable of bikes. That being said if I see someone riding one out on the trails Im not going to verbally attack him and call him names because who cares? Is seeing someone on an E bike going to ruin your day on the trails? Absolutely not! And if your someone who feels the need to put down anyone because of the type of bike they ride you need to find a new sport because thats not what mountain biking is about. Period.
That's not true, though. People's use of e-bikes may significantly affect every mountain biker's trail access. If it is indeed true that e-mtb sales are significant, this is a real problem.
This is the same reason why people who play any part in trail access politics have no choice but to think about e-mtb's in some way.