Short Track Setup Tricks From Pro Racers - Nove Mesto XC World Cup 2021

May 16, 2021
by Ed Spratt  
Jordan Sarrou had his time out front in the beggining.

Just before the short track race flew through the mud in Nove Mesto, we caught up with six of the top teams to go over their XCC bike setup tricks:



Absolute-Absalon Team

BMC
BMC
The biggest factor for tire choice is the track condition and surfaces. At Nove Mesto, there is quite a bit of tarmac that helps to clear the tires of any mud picked up. The BMC mechanic decided to use the Vittoria Mezcal because of its fast-rolling properties with Vittoria's Peyote as a backup choice as it clears the mud faster. In the short XCC format, the Mezcal should work fine as it can shed any muck on the many tarmac sections but the Peyote could be a good option for the longer XC race as the ability of the tire to clear mud becomes more important as there is less tarmac and more need to have as much grip as possible.

BMC
BMC
When it comes to tire casing Pauline Ferrand Prevot was looking to run a lighter option while Mathis Azzaro is opting for a reinforced casing front and rear. The rest of the team will be fitting a combination of lighter casings upfront and reinforced on the rear.

BMC
BMC
Nove Mesto features less gradient than Albstadt and with the fast finish on the tarmac that nearly always ends in a sprint finish, the team are looking to up-size their chainring size. Most likely, this will mean going up by two chainring teeth in size.



Cannondale Factory Team

Cannondale
Cannondale
Last week in Albstadt, the Cannondale team were running a narrower tire for the flat out tarmac section and the grass climb. This weekend the XCC course featured some tricky tech sections, so riders went for a 2.25" tire for additional protection in the rock gardens. The extra tire width will help the team's riders have more confidence in hitting the rock section with higher speeds than the narrow option they were running for the more simple Albstadt course.

Cannondale
Alongisde the narrower tires in Albstadt the team also chose narrow rims to help with the shape of the smaller tire width. Albstadt's loop with more tarmac and grass and less tech meant a narrow tire and rim offered more benefits to the riders. This weekend they are running a wider rim and tire for the rock sections on course.

Cannondale

Just like the BMC team they are sizing up the chainrings from 36 to 38 teeth. The Cannondale team say this change will be kept for the whole weekend and not just for the XCC race as it's flatter here with less steep climbs than the first World Cup round in Albstadt. The Cannondale riders feel more comfortable pushing the bigger ring on the longer but less steep climbs in Nove Mesto, with the added benefit that they can push harder if racing ends in a sprint on the tarmac finish straight.

The Cannondale riders are also dropping their suspension settings slightly to cope with the bigger hits and roots on the Nove Mesto course. It also should help find some extra traction in the tricky conditions.



Victor Koretzky - KMC Orbea

Orbea Koretzky
For last week's XC winner Victor Koretzky, there aren't any big changes with his suspension for the XCC race leaving his settings the same for the short course format. Victor will also be running his dropper post but the team have a spare seatpost on standby in case he wants to save a bit of extra weight.

Orbea Koretzky
Orbea Koretzky
When it comes to tire choice Victor is running narrower options with a fast-rolling tread for the XCC Short Track race but if conditions are particularly wet then the team have another option.

Orbea Koretzky
With the narrow gap between XCC practice and the race on Friday. The team mechanics have the more mud appropriate ready on a spare set of wheels, so they don't have to spend much time swapping between the options.

Orbea Koretzky
The last change on Victor's XCC race bike is the chainring where he joins most of the men's field in running a 38 tooth ring up from a 36 for the XC race.



Santa Cruz FSA XC Team

Santa Cruz FSA
Santa Cruz FSA
The Santa Cruz FSA riders have chosen a 2.1" tire for the XCC Short Track racing instead of the 2.25" option they run in the XC race.

Santa Cruz FSA
For the flat out XCC format, the mechanics make a few changes to the suspension with the idea of making it slightly stiffer than the riders will want for the longer and more gruelling XC race on Sunday.

Santa Cruz FSA
Again, the riders choose a bigger chainring for the sprint with most of the team running the large 38 tooth ring.

Santa Cruz FSA
Interestingly, the Santa Cruz FSA team are not running droppers for the XCC race despite the added rock gardens for this venue's course. Instead, they are dropping them for a standard post, with a claimed weight saving of around 200 grams.



Jordan Sarrou - Specialized Factory XC Team

Specialized Sarrou
Specialized Sarrou
One of the major changes on the current XC World Champion Jordan Sarrou's bike is a more firm suspension setup. Jordan's mechanic says this is for the fast tarmac sections and any potential sprint finishes.

Specialized Sarrou
Specialized Sarrou
When we caught up with his mechanic, the bike was running the low profile, light and fast-rolling S-Works tires, but we were told that after a practice on the course and if conditions were muddy then this could be swapped out for the XCC race.

Specialized Sarrou
Jordan Sarrou is another Elite Male rider opting for the 38 tooth chainring.



Trek Factory Racing Team

Trek
Trek
The Trek Factory Racing Team try and keep their bikes similar between the XC and XCC races, but they do play about with the air in the tires and the suspension. For tires, they add between one and two psi, the suspension has four to five psi added for the fast Friday evening races.

Trek
When we checked out the bikes in the pits, the race machines were sporting front fenders. Both Evie and Jolanda will be keeping these on for the weekend's racing, Anton Cooper was undecided and wasn't sure if it would be removed for the race to save a bit of weight. The dropper posts were most likely to stay on all the bikes across the weekend.

Trek
Intersetingly, we were told that Evie Richards is one of the few if not the only Elite Woman running a large 36 tooth chainring with some time spent practicing on the 38 before deciding on the slightly smaller size for the race.

Trek
Trek
Trek opted for the Bontrager XR3 team issue rubber and will run the same width for short track and XCO. Inserts were being used front and rear by the women on the team but the men opted to run without them for the XCC race. The added rock gardens have not made any difference to the way the Trek mechanics were setting up the bikes for XCC.




Author Info:
edspratt avatar

Member since Mar 16, 2017
3,051 articles

93 Comments
  • 90 8
 "This weekend the XCC course featured some tricky tech sections, so riders went for a 2.25" tire for additional protection in the rock gardens."

What is this? A tire for ants?!?!
  • 14 1
 There are a few riders on 2.4” tires but not many. My guess is that fatter tires slightly slow them down especially during sprints. So they trade grip for speed instead. Same story with dropper. It’s all because how insanely fast and competitive they are during the race.

As an amateur I would rather trade speed for control so I can at least finish the course without crashing. But at their level everything counts.
  • 15 0
 It needs to be at least... 3 times bigger than this!
  • 5 1
 @winkeyless you’ve been whooshed
  • 58 1
 Victor Koretzky running gravel tires lol
  • 10 1
 Those tires are slicks in my book.
  • 8 37
flag gabeohuncho (May 16, 2021 at 10:28) (Below Threshold)
 @tacklingdummy: Do you know what a slick is?
  • 1 0
 Wow that gravel tire seems highly slippery in mud. Maybe more suitable for dry and fast tracks. And how puncture proof can it be is the question. Maybe I’m missing something here?
  • 3 0
 @winkeyless: don’t know about Koretzky’s Michelin gravel tires but I run on Pirelli gravel 38mm tires (gravel bike) and recently did some real mountain trails on them - lose rocks, steep, not enduro more like normal mtb kind of places. Nothing broke. I would love to have some real mtb bike there but it was doable and somehow exciting. They were ok on some mud.
  • 22 8
 I don't have super rocky stuff where I live, it's either a mix of smooth and rooty, or 1 trail that has more rock than dirt (and that's not exaggerating). There isn't racing on said 1 trail. I never run a dropper post, believing that the 1lb (on the ones I can afford) I'd add for climbing isn't worth it. Is this dumb thinking, or am I right in saying that I'm much better off saving money, maintenance time, and weight?
  • 37 0
 If I'm not racing, the fun factor, confidence, freedom with movement a dropper post adds is well worth it!
  • 22 5
 Getting downvoted for asking a question? What the f*ck people.
  • 1 0
 The only way you"ll ever know is to use one and see for yourself.
Probably you don't need one.
  • 3 0
 Unless you are only riding gravel I would say it's definitely worth it. I have found maintenance to be fairly minimal and I'm not convinced an extra pound makes that much difference on the climbs. I honestly don't know if it makes you faster overall if that is important to you but it makes things much more fun.
  • 2 0
 From my very limited experience in XC racing I would say it's much easier to overtake someone on a climb than it is to overtake someone on a descent.

Partially because it can get sketchy at higher speeds, partially because the person in front of you will probably already ride the fastest line so you have to overtake them while riding a slower line, and partially because there isn't always place to overtake on descents (at least where I raced).

Because of this it's interesting for pro racers to dedicated their set up for the climbs (lighter), rather than for the descents (more control with a dropper post).

Similarly pro racers often ride the narrowest handlebars they can get away with. For them those couple of seconds they win on being more aero and the extra space it gives them to overtake other riders is worth it, while for us average humans it wouldn't make any sense to ride narrow bars.
  • 7 0
 What frames are the SantaCruz racers riding? Is it new, or a Blur or something?
  • 7 0
 Proto's but probably the next blur
  • 5 1
 Still don’t think they’d drop the current Blur from the lineup - might really be a new Superlight.
  • 10 0
 Talking bout blur… as far as I can tell it looks like two of the three Santa bikes in the picture do have dropper posts installed, despite the caption.
  • 2 1
 @FuzzyL: the current Blur really needs an geo-update. I don’t really see them updating the old and also releasing a new one.
  • 4 2
 Is a new SuperLight. They've brought it back as a new xc race bike. The blur will remain as a different, less race oriented bike.
  • 23 18
 I dont see whats so special about a 38t chainring with a 50-52t cassette. Many amateur riders use 32t rings with 11 speed cassettes on their enduro bikes which the same gear ratio.
  • 20 2
 you need to produce some serious "wattage" to get through some of the steep sections with 4 or 6 extra teeth.
  • 9 6
 @t-stoff: I understand, but we are talking about top level xc racers that make twice the watts per kg of the average joe.
  • 16 0
 You have higher gearing at final gears this way. Yes, you get the same climbing ratios, but the maximum speed increases.
  • 53 3
 Most amateur Enduro riders would walk up all Nove Mesto climbs except some of the the gravel sections.
  • 3 0
 @endoplasmicreticulum: I know that, that's why that comparison is a little bit off, to pull those 38 that seem "just a little bit over the 32" that an average enduro rider has on his bike you got to be way more powerful (sustained). I have a 34 on my xc (vs 32 on the enduro) and it's already a serious compromise on some really step hills (after a longe race). But yeah you certainly can get higher speed as @speedy-fox2 was saying.
  • 2 1
 @t-stoff: What kind of gradient could you expect at a top level XC race?
  • 21 1
 @endoplasmicreticulum: strange how there aren't so many amateurs winning world cup XCC races on their enduro bikes with a 32t chainring + 11 speed...maybe you're onto something there!
  • 10 5
 @chris-brown225: So its my bike and not the lack of a 5,5W/kg FTP that stops me winning pro xc races. Got it Wink
  • 5 0
 It gets the mitochondrias working doubletime. Especially on flats.
  • 24 1
 Chainring size, dropper yes/no, tire/suspension psi… and we’re done. When there’s not much to talk about a journalist has to make a big deal about what’s there.

I suspect the real issue with chainring size isn’t about min/max gearing so much as minimizing the time spent in the outside cogs and associated watt losses. I think the 10t robs ~25 watts, while a larger cog with a straight chain is like 4. The 52 is pretty bad too, and I’m betting they try to stay out of it as well. But all of this throws shade at the sponsors 12 speed flagships, so nobody really mentions it.
  • 7 0
 @Blackhat: outstanding point. Generally try to avoid spending a ton of time in either the smallest or largest cassette cog. Thats worth thinking about while building a bike for someone average too, because i think the extreme ends of the cassette wear faster and the chain wears worse than in the middle of the cassette
  • 3 0
 It's for the sprint at the end. Since this course has less climbing and may come down to a sprint, in the end, the losses in having a larger ring are going to be smaller than the gains of the extra teeth for the sprint and flaats.
  • 4 0
 @endoplasmicreticulum: I just watched the race and there is a 39 degree section on course!!
  • 2 0
 Thank God the max chainring size on my bikes are 32 Teeth because I would be tempted to try a 38, nah F-that
  • 1 0
 lol my lowest gear is a 30/32 (im not sure) -42 and im doin fine
  • 2 3
 @Scottycruz: Where even the top riders pushed their bikes. With all those riders switching between MTB and cyclocross all the time, there might be the reason for the trend to bigger chainrings. If you’re not going to try to ride the steep sections anyway, why bother with low gears?
  • 1 11
flag mior Mod (May 16, 2021 at 9:32) (Below Threshold)
 @FuzzyL: i ride up 45 degree loose rocks every ride and its not that hard
  • 2 0
 @FuzzyL: It sure looked like they were trying to me…
  • 6 0
 @mior: It’s not like they couldn’t do it. In cyclocross it has been agreed a long time ago that from a certain gradient/difficulty upwards you will not lose time (and save energy) pushing or carrying your bike, so that’s what everybody does. It was different (at least it seemed so the me) in mountain biking, where a few years ago you could tell that someone was entirely spent as soon as they started pushing their bikes even in very steep climbs.
  • 6 1
 @Scottycruz: Probably more like 39% incline which is already very steep. A 39° incline would be 81%.
  • 1 0
 @magnusc: Not so sure. Put them on 20lb bike instead of a 32lb bike and you might see some good climbing.
  • 1 0
 Lots of copium up in here.
  • 1 5
flag aljoburr (May 16, 2021 at 12:20) (Below Threshold)
 @Blackhat: Have invented a multi speed gearing with perfect chain line in every gear, but no one seem interested, since the chain will not get dirty?
Current gearing is all about built in obsolescence!
  • 2 0
 @endoplasmicreticulum: Yes! That's what I meant Smile
  • 1 4
 @aljoburr: A gear box crank! These are always fun.

Shimano currently sells a system offering "multi speed gearing with perfect chain line in every gear" called Alfine. Rollhoff offers a similar concept, and Pinion makes a crank based gear box. None are particularly popular, and practically non-existent in the performance bike arena. So why exactly are companies supposed to be beating down your door for this invention?

There are only two companies with a major interest in drivetrain wear item replacement, and one of them already offers a product. Oh, and SRAM's eagle chains had the longest wear life of any chain ever tested. I'm sure that was just an accident though. But yeah, sure. It's a conspiracy. Of two. And both have broken rank.

Why don't you post pictures/videos of your prototype for us to take a look at? I assume you already tested the frictional losses since that's the major issue for gearbox systems, so post that data as well if you don't mind.
  • 2 0
 32:10 isnt 38:10, or is it?
  • 1 0
 Bigger chainrings like (38T ring) will have less chance of chain drops because more teeth hold the chain on the chainring better.
  • 1 0
 With 51 or 52 bottom sprockets I think some would go for bigger chain rings than those listed above if the frames could fit them. On many frames the max is 36 or 38 or you hit the chainstay.
  • 1 0
 @Grosey: EXACTLY!! it's not the climbing gears that they are changing by sizing up their chainrings. its the sprinting gears. Of course a 38-52 isn't much different to a 32-42 or 36 or whatever you run. but a 38-10 is waaaay bigger than 32-10.
  • 1 0
 @magnusc: Not riders from North Vancouver (the shore) they could and do routinely out climb everybody... I've seen tons euro riders here walk up fromme while locals have a beer in one hand while riding up the switch backs chatting.
  • 1 0
 @Blackhat: Will be less frictional losses, See what I mean about about getting down voted?
Pinkbike will not let me post anything!
  • 1 0
 @aljoburr: The link you give for the drive chain patent is to one that was withdrawn?? Could be why people read your comments with suspicion or confusion.
  • 1 0
 @Riggbeck: Blocked would be better description, but moving on 12 years have better design, plus loads of flaws with patent process?
Can understand the confusion with current gearing, but just sealing any chain drive will make it more efficient than a dirty chain?
  • 1 0
 @aljoburr: so you don’t have efficiency data. But you pinky promise it’ll be better. And I’m assuming you don’t even have a prototype based on the way you skated past that. And your previous patent application was rejected, and you don’t currently have another pending. And you simply ignored all the actual, verifiable facts about current alternative drivetrains that contradicts your conspiracy theory, and even when back to it a second time. All over a problem that very few cyclists are actually concerned about.

And you wonder why no one takes you seriously or wants to invest in your idea? I’ve seen perpetual motion peddlers with a better case.
  • 1 1
 @Blackhat: OK want some fact, I was studying at Napier university when filled patent, Turns out that Shimano & Napier had same patent agent, Plus was given no help with my studies after that, So sorry if when I spoke to Murgitroyd that was told it was a Conflict of interests & yes I admit that did not understand why at the time
But EVERY cyclist has to oil there chain, BUT this goes right back to when had chain guards to stop you getting your skirt caught in your chain?
I think you know the rest?
  • 6 0
 Looks like Anton Cooper is the most weight-sensitive person ever! I don't think I'd notice if somebody added 15 grams to my 10kg XC bike...
  • 9 1
 You could just clip your fingernails and toenails prior to the race to make up for that front fender weight. Maybe manscape a bit more aggressively if needed.
  • 10 4
 Man those solid chain rings are ugly! They look like my skill saw blade.
  • 2 0
 You say that the Cannondale team is running a wider wheel for the XCO events? I'm curious which ENVE wheel you are speaking of? I really only ever see them running the 25mm 525 wheel.
  • 6 2
 Vittoria is not only making some of the best tires, but absolutely has the best tire names of all time!
  • 1 0
 Their tires are really well made and good quality, but their tread patterns just don't work in my conditions.
  • 3 0
 TLBig Grin R - here's the summary for everyone else: In a discipline that's all about maximum speed many riders opt for gearing and tires that favor speed over endurance.
  • 2 0
 Noticed Victor Koretzky was running a Fox 32 on his hardtail in Albstad but is running a new Fox 34 on the Dual rig for Nova Mesto. I wonder if that is a rider or sponsorship decision? Not judging either way, just curious...
  • 1 0
 Bringing the lighter 32/hardtail setup to climby Albstadt and 34/fully to rooty rocky Nove Mesto makes rider/course choice sense to me. But certainly the bike industry has created our "choices" to help serve their needs as well. Hence, n+1 bike math.
  • 4 0
 The Orbea has a special fox shock. (I think?)
  • 1 0
 Yup, It has proprietary shock with the lockout on the opposite side than rebound and compression levers.
  • 2 0
 38t rings and low height knobby tires on every single bike doesn't really make for "tricks", this is pretty much stock vanilla xc equipment no?
  • 2 0
 Why can't they just go one tooth bigger, instead of 2?
  • 23 0
 because of x-sync chainrings, you need one thick and one thin tooth so only pairs.
  • 4 0
 Narrow tooth, wide tooth. They have to be in pairs to match the chain
  • 3 0
 MTB chainrings are produced in 2T increments, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36,.... etc
  • 5 1
 What comes after narrow? Wide!
  • 1 0
 @dirtyburger: new sram chain is wide boost wide....
  • 2 0
 @Niv24: that's true now but they were still all even numbers before narrow wide made it essential.
  • 1 0
 @kevinturner12: Single speeders would sometimes run 31t or 33t rings, and I think the XC doubles would sometimes have an odd number on one of the rings. Maybe even was most common to reduce how many sizes were manufactured and stocked
  • 2 0
 Excellent detail topic and photos, Ed and Ross. Much appreciated.
  • 1 0
 Must be fun for the mechanics swapping between chainrings with that 54nM DUB bolt Smile
  • 1 0
 No problem if you have a big ratchet wrench and not using your small hex-tools. I would say the press fit BB is a lot more hassle.
  • 1 0
 is Koretsky on a 120 fork?
  • 1 0
 Phew... I only saw a canyon and a sprayed bmc.
  • 5 5
 removing a fender to “save some weight” might be the most absurd thing i’ve heard all week.
  • 4 0
 Carrying around the weight of the mud collected by the fender is probably what he was referring to. Another problem is if the space between the tyre and fender gets packed with dense mud/debris.
  • 1 0
 If there’s no mud, why run a fender?
  • 1 0
 mezcal so fast
  • 1 1
 Peyote is discontinued.
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.048144
Mobile Version of Website