For whatever reason, steel-framed bikes with fun as the intended riding style seem to be as British as Yorkshire Pudding and Coronation Street. And with 125mm of travel, big wheels, and some smart geometry, that'd also be an apt way to describe Cotic's revised FlareMAX 29er trail bike.
The FlareMAX name isn't new, but Cotic has made some big changes for the 2020 model, including upping the rear-wheel travel to 125mm. They've tinkered with the progression as well, with the bike now having ''
a wider tuning window for riders to get their perfect ride regardless of their weight and riding style." You can pair that with either a 130mm or 140mm-travel fork, depending on what sort of bike you're looking for; the former will offer a bit quicker handling, while the later will better suit higher speeds.
If you're not a big wheel kinda rider, they also have the 27.5'' wheeled Flare non-MAX (they just call it the Flare) that are also built using Reynolds 853 steel for the front triangle. That's how you know its real, man.
Cotic has long been using some pretty forward-thinking geometry compared to more commonly seen brands, and that continues with the new FlareMAX. A large-sized frame gets a 490mm reach and a 75.3-degree seat angle, while all sizes use a 65.6-degree head angle (w/ a 130mm fork), 32mm of drop, and a 447.5mm rear-center. They've called it 'Longshot' geometry for years now, and it's intended to work well with a 35mm stem.
Want to know more? Check out
www.cotic.co.uk for the details.
Though as I said you first comment that it is not as simple as an orange is very true.
I would definitely recommend a cotic though. I've got a 2018 Rocket longshot geo and its rad!
I only ever heard good things about Cotic bikes so I won't argue with the fact that they might be good bikes. I just fail to see how they would be more "less is better" than anything else on the market, minus single pivots and hardtails.
Steel is not like that. With all due respect to Murmur for the thought behind choice of tubing and geometry, it looks banal and those bent stays are like “the hell?”
You are also missing the complexity of somgle pivots like Orange because you focus on suspension system and miss how much harder it is to draw tubing from the shock to pivot and the rear wheel so that it doesn’t like like 2005 Bullit. And Orange and their tubing made of folded sheets being “less” come on...
I've owned a few orange bikes, loved them, great bikes. I agree the tube forming and design work that goes into the bike is definitely not simple, getting them to look nice is not easy. The guys in Halifax are artists when it comes to bending tubes. Building one in your garage would be very difficult indeed. The vid Guy Martin did, certainly highlighted how much work goes into making them.
However, I would argue that the premise of single pivot suspension design would be thought rightly or wrongly by many people to be a simpler design. Certainly simple to maintain at the very least and often simple to predict how they will ride on the trail. That is what I meant by simple, not that the process of making/designing/testing them is simple.
I do agree with the less is more comment re:cotic bikes. They manage to avoid the steam punk look as you say. Really pleased with how mine looks and rides. Also Cotic are super friendly whenver you ask them for advice.
In essence, I agree with you
1. The prospect of possibly having to replace a lot of bearings at once put me off. Of oourse I do realize that nowadays you can find good multi-pivot bikes with very durable bearings but back then I just wasn't sure which brand to trust. Two big bearings were just two strong bearings in my mind.
2. Being new to full suspension bikes I just wasn't sure what I wanted out of my suspension. Descriptions of progressive-degressive-progressive sound all nice and sensible, but what if these transitions and rates just happen to be in the wrong spot? You can't just tweak a linkage to your liking unless you had a Nicolai with a million shock mount options. If the suspension design is simple, it is much easier to tweak the suspension by having the shock tuned or replaced. Not that I ever resorted to that option (other than dumping loads of grease in the air can for more progression), but it just gave some peace of mind knowing that the option is there without ditching the frame altogether.
I am aware of these "less is more" or "a design is perfect when there is nothing else you can remove from it" trains of thought and maybe it is thing for some out there. But for me it were just the two reasons above.
Friendly yours
Again, that was my thinking back in 2007. I may have been right or wrong but it just happened to be my reason to go with a single pivot design.
God Save British Steels Bikes! :-)
Dear brands, MAKE THIS A THING
-Sincerely, bike shops
@WAKIdesigns the Inline was a turd but the new Air IL is a totally different shock internally. It does look the same as the Inline but is probably the best "inline-style" shock I've used to date. Beats the pants off anything from SRAM, including their reservoir shocks, and the CS platform is the BEST climbing platform on Earth. Fox, DVO, etc cannot compete with that. its amazing.
Those NC boys know how to build suspension...
Cotic stated 3.3kg for the XL which isnt heavy at all.
www.cotic.co.uk/order/framebuilder/flareMAX
Just discovered that a SC Hightower C (carbon) is not much lighter at 3.1kg, and the aluminium version of the same frame weighs a horrific 4.4kg!!?
You should make more of this I think - I’m sure a lot of people are just going to assume these steel bikes are heavier than they are and look elsewhere.
Cheers,
Cy @ Cotic