Although it may seem like mega-wide rims are the only ones worth considering, especially judging by some of the content on this very website, there's still a place for lightweight, skinny hoops in this world. I'm mostly talking about cross-country racing, of course, but there are surely plenty of trail riders who still prefer a fast accelerating, sub-1,500 gram set of wheels built with slender rims over something that weighs a pound more and is nearly twice as wide. Easton's 1,433 gram EC90 XC 29 wheelset has been designed with those riders in mind, although the company says that the wheels can be used to ''shred rough trails all week long and then go on to win World Cup cross-country races on the weekend.'' The wheelset's UST certified carbon fiber rims measure 19mm wide internally, making them better suited to tires that are less then 2.3'' wide, and the front and rear wheels weigh 1,433 grams on my scale when fitted with Easton's aluminum XD freehub body.
EC90 XC 29 Details• Intended use: cross-country / trail riding
• Wheel size: 29''
• Rim material: carbon fiber
• UST tubeless rim
• Internal rim width: 19mm
• Sapim straight-pull spokes
• 24 spokes front and rear
• Axle: 15mm / QR, 12 x 142mm / QR
• Freehub: alloy, XD or Shimano compatible
• Weight: 1,433 grams (
F: 639g, R: 794g)
• MSRP: $2,200 USD
•
www.eastoncycling.com /
@EASTONcycling Carbon Fiber RimsAt 1,433 grams, Easton claims that the EC90 XC 29 wheels are the lightest UST 29er option on the market, a point that's largely due to their carbon fiber rims. These aren't just any catalog-order carbon fiber rims, though, with the company saying that they're actually employing proprietary ingredients to manufacture their 'Armoured Ballistic Composite' (
ABC) rims in Taiwan. I'm told that the ABC material is similar to what the military employs for lightweight body armour and some ballistic applications, with the idea being that if it is resilient enough for the military to use, it's probably tough enough for us to bounce them off some rocks and roots.
So what is ABC? Easton says that they employ exclusive yarns and laminate structures, along with ''
MRES-class resin formulation involving rubberizing and other impact-resistant components,'' that allows them to use 15 - 20 percent less resin than if they went with a more conventional approach, but still end up with a finished product that's extremely strong. They also use high-modulus polyethylene rather than Kevlar for a high strength to weight ratio, which is supposed to be ideal in situations that require resistance to ballistic and blast impacts. Their words, not mine, and while I don't suspect that most us need to be concerned over how our rims will hold up to gunfire, it's not far fetched to assume that a material designed to withstand bullets could also shrug off some pointy rocks and misjudged line choices.
The final product is 19mm wide internally (
24mm externally), which makes them better suited to tires less than 2.3" wide in order to avoid excess casing roll, and they sport a sealed UST rim shape that allows you to set them up tubeless without fussing about with rim tape. This is possible due to Easton's patented double-threaded nipples that turn into inserts in the rim's outer face, thereby allowing Easton to forgo having to mould or drill holes in the rim bed to provide access to the nipples. The carbon rim's UST designation doesn't just denote a sealed rim bed, though, as the rim must also conform to the UST standard that includes both a specifically shaped bead hook and humps on either side that help to lock the tire in place. Companies that use the UST design say that it makes for a much more secure, and therefore safer, tire and rim combination.
Easton's Latest HubsEaston has a bit of a spotted past when it comes to their hubs, but they say their latest design has sorted out the bearing life issues that have plagued the company's otherwise impressive wheels. The all-black hubs no longer offer the ability for the rider to adjust bearing tension, which is probably a good thing when you consider that many people were likely over-tightening them, which then drastically reduced bearing life. Instead, there's a much simpler design that only requires that you tighten the rear axle to 10 Nm. The job does require a large wrench and a 12mm hex key, though, the latter of which most people probably won't have kicking about in the bottom of their toolbox, although it's not a task that should need to be done more often than doing your taxes. The axle also has lefthand threads to keep it from undoing itself when you're riding, much like how the drive-side threads of a traditional bottom bracket are lefthand threaded for the same reason.
Both the front and rear hubs spin on sealed bearings, as you'd expect, and the freehub body employs a traditional three-pawl design that everyone will be familiar with, and it engages with a thirty tooth drive-ring inside the hub shell to provide twelve degrees between engagement points. Replaceable hub end-caps allow the front to fit either 15mm thru-axles or forks with quick-release lowers (
remember those?), while the rear hub can do both 12 x 142mm axles or 135mm quick-release setups. No Boost option at this point in time, though.
On The TrailI mounted up two different sets of tires on the EC90 XC 29s - a set of 2.25" wide Vittoria Barzos, and some Racing Ralphs from Schwalbe - all of which went on quickly and easily without spraying sealant or making me throw any tools across the shop. Setup is made even more painless by the sealed UST rim bed saving you from having to wrap the rim with tubeless tape, which isn't exactly a hard job to do, but it is one less thing to have to think about. I flatted a few months ago while using a different wheelset because the tubeless rim tape actually tore for some reason, but this won't ever be an issue with the EC90 XC 29s.
If you've never had the opportunity to ride a set of wheels that barely weigh more than a single dual-ply downhill tire does, you're missing out. You literally feel fitter and like you've just mainlined a triple dose of caffeine, especially if the EC90 XC 29s are replacing something more run of the mill like the 1,800 grams wheels that were previously on my bike. The result was faster acceleration and higher speeds all around, and I'm not just talking about them
feeling faster - my times up my local ascents all tumbled after installing Easton's flyweight wheels. The stopwatch doesn't lie, but it shouldn't really come as a surprise given that I dropped nearly a full pound of rotating weight, which is the most important mass when you consider that we use our meager horsepower to get our wheels spinning in the first place.
As far as rigidity goes, the EC90 XC 29s feel adequate relative to burlier cross-country wheelsets out there, despite having only twenty four spokes per wheel and weighing very little. I come in at around 165lb and probably ride above my skill level on occasion, but I never felt like the wheels were flexing an excessive amount. In fact, I'd argue that they
feel better on the trail than a set of wider ENVEs or XTR wheels, and although that's a subjective thing to say, the best way to describe the difference is that some of the competition can make you feel like there's a few extra PSI in your tires, whereas the EC90 XC 29s have a touch more forgiving nature to them. This is a good thing, especially on a short-travel bike. I wouldn't call them flexible, though, as these are pure cross-country wheels and they're more than laterally rigid enough for that task.
There's no arguing that the 19mm internal width of the Easton carbon rim will seem excessively slim to some, especially as even cross-country rims are tending to go wider and wider these days, and it makes the EC90 XC 29s and whatever tires you end up running a bit sensitive to air pressure. I had some noticeable casing roll and sealant bleeding out at the bead, even when running the 2.25" wide Barzos in the mid-twenties, with the blame falling on the 19mm rim width rather than the tires themselves (
I had no issues with the Barzos on wider rims). Adding just a few PSI put an end to this, but the 19mm width means that they're not best suited to wide tires or low pressures.
ReliabilityBearing life is still up to par, with both the front and rear wheels spinning smoothly after months of use. Anyone who's used Easton's wheels from a few years ago might be surprised by this fact, but the company has obviously made some improvements on this front. There was something odd going on with the rear wheel's axle, though, with there being a smidge of bearing play, or at least something that felt a lot like bearing play, that refused to go away regardless of how tight I did the axle and end-cap up. Easton says to tighten the axle to a very snug 10 Nm, which is 88 inlb (
disc rotor bolts are often torqued to 55 inlb), but the small amount of knocking at the hub never went away despite any amount of force applied. Sure, the play only added up to maybe a millimeter or two at the rim, but I'd bet that anyone who just shelled out $2,200 USD would be bummed by it. Easton did say that this would be covered by their warranty program, though.
The 1,433 gram weight of the EC90 XC 29 wheels suggests that they probably aren't the best choice if you measure your ride enjoyment in time spent airborne, but having said that, they held up relatively well to the sort of abuse and neglect one usually tends to only dishes out when they simply get to hand the product back and walk away from any repair bills - the only upkeep being a single truing session for the rear wheel. It wasn't out by much, but it was enough that I wanted to stay on top of it before it got worse, which it never did after setting it straight in the truing stand. I'd say this is acceptable for such a light wheelset that was treated pretty roughly.
Pinkbike’s Take: | These are not the wheels for your six-inch travel bike, and there are better choices if you want to run high-volume tires, but you'll already know that if you've read the review. However, at 1,433 grams and with a great feel on the trail, the EC90 XC 29s are a smart choice for the cross-country rider or racer who wants a no-holds-barred wheelset that won't leave any room for upgrading. - Mike Levy |
Visit the feature gallery for high resolution and additional images
I love these arguments. my car is available for $800 if anywone is interested.
Good. Damn good.
I am convinced that there is a special place in hell for BOOST and all of its offspring.
ridealongside.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/wpid-pro-2-evo-front-and-rear-boost-comparisons.jpg
Flange width rear : 51.5 -> 57.5 (+11.6%)
Flange width front : 53.5 -> 58.5 (+9.3%)
This is quite interesting but they would better keep the 20x110 instead of creating 15x100 and then update to 15x110
First ones are flat for 135mm & 150mm hubs
Second ones have a 3.5mm hollow for positioning the wheel correctly, so the 135 become 142mm and 150 become 157mm with just different spacers.
The 148 is made for the second type of dropouts so it is not compatible with a 150mm hub because the disc and the cassette will not be on the right place. 148mm hub could be compared to a 141mm hub for flat dropouts.
The stupid thing is that the 150/157mm hubs have the same flange spacing that the 135/142 ones.
www.jejamescycles.co.uk/item-images-large/hope-pro-ii-evo-rear-hub-150mm-12mm-bolt-through-234010.jpg
They could just make the flange of the 150/157 hubs wider and use this existing standard instead of creating this new boost.
www.bikerumor.com/2014/12/19/2016-axle-standards-part-1-rear-148mm-thru-axle-coming-fast-its-about-more-than-just-better-wheels
Used Enve wheels? I wish! When will the price go down?
Used Easton wheels? Nope, not even for $100. Proprietary spoke system, bad bearings and terrible post purchase parts availability.
Thing is, the warranty is supposed to be a statement of quality, you should never need it but with Easton you use the warranty until it runs out and then you are SOL. What is the number one gripe of old Easton wheels? The shifty machining and bearings being eaten? So clearly that still hasn't been fixed. Tell pinkbike that it is a warranty issue? Up yours Easton. Rattle hubs means you have another design boo boo.
With their bad rep Easton needs to provide a much more convincing value prop besides fancy graphics. Need some convincing assurance that their old post purchase support has been fixed. I'll give them another chance when they publicly disown whatever dumbass that previously ran the division. Head on stake, crying family out on street, etc. Either that or they somehow grow a reputation for reliability over the next few YEARS.
I since moved on to an carbon wheelset with a hope hub.
So, in summary, a wider (19 vs 22), stronger (24h vs 32h), more servicable (hopes vs Easton), cheaper ($2200 vs $988 shipped) that's only ~100g heavier. Yeah, I'm gonna stick with the LB wheels. (yes, I'm a XC weight weenie wannabe, a rare sighting on PB I know).
The stock wheels on my bike were 24H straight pull. Nothing but problems, and I weigh 165# and live in south Florida so I just ride in sand all day. Yeah. I'm good on inferior designs like 24h straight pull XC wheels, thanks tho.
This is ridiculous, even for XC. Not too many people roll on 2" tires anymore. I ride and race a rigid 29er and used to feel 2.25" tires fold under in hard turns even on TL28 rim (23mm int.). I'm on LB 35mm carbon rims nowadays and couldn't imagine going back to something as narrow as this..
Make it a proper width that keeps up with the times. Only then we can even start arguing about the high price and the hubs' quality.
As it stands, I wouldn't use them even at a fraction of their msrp.
To those of you who like FUX you must have never dealt with their service dept.
However, that's when it all started to unravel. In short I would not recommend buying ANY wheel from Easton. The main reason is their hubs are absolutely awful and I believe I can't swap them out for anything else. I've got 1st and 2nd generation hubs with their later mods. They are now onto this 3rd gen, but from the Pinkbike report above they are still suffering from play. The 2nd generation are considerably worse than the first! I replace bearings typically every 6-9 weeks and I have got through 4 freebodies, two sets of pawls and countless seals in an attempt to keep water out of the freebody trying to make the freebody/pawls last longer. The weak pawl spring has now caused premature wear to the drive ring on both hubs.
The second major issue has been the constant lack of spare parts and aftersales service from Easton in the US over the last four years of ownership.
I am in the UK. Initially, I thought the lack of parts was due to the UK importer. But I have been unable to source parts from anywhere in the world. I couldn't buy nipples or a 20mm to 15mm axle conversion from anyone. I had to wait 5 months for that, and I have never been able to get their proprietary nipples in black in four years!
I have split four rear rims and one front rim. I have been waiting 6 weeks for the last rim to be replaced as Easton US could not source one from anywhere and had to make a new batch. But it is only 8 months since that rim was replaced and I had to wait 6 weeks for it also.
I weigh 68kg (150lbs) so not exactly heavy. The rears have all failed the same way. The front rim has a relatively minor crack in the flange which I super glued approx 1 year ago and that is still holding.
That said, I think for the weight, the strength of the carbon rim is pretty decent. I typically ride four times a week and the terrain is rough and fast. So I accept I subject them to a hard time and can therefore accept the rim failures, just not the constant hub failures and waiting months for parts or repairs. I get lots of apologies, but nothing has changed in four years. If anything it has got worse as they are 26" rims.
In addition to all that, once the two year no questions warranty is up. When you break another rim (and you will) Easton's so called discounted rim replacement scheme referred to as the "rim package" amounts to a 30% discount off RRP circa £700 ($1100) for a new rim on a hub with a heavily worn drive ring due to the weak pawl spring on the freebody. So effectively writes-off the wheel after just over 2years.
Sorry for the long story but I would like to share / warn any fellow riders what they are getting into. I've spent £4000 ($6200) on these Easton wheels and one set is scrap after two years and the other set will be scrap in another approx. 8 months as I will break another rim, and my two year warranty is up in two months time. Although I am going to try and get that extended as I have been without the wheels for a more than 3 months during the two years.
You can get wheel sets with wider rims sub 1700 grams which is only a half pound heavier than these. I'm running Derby rims on DT350 hubs on DT aerolite spokes and they weight 1690 grams. They take an absolute beating too and come back for more.