PRESS RELEASE: EvolveAfter two years of design and prototyping the Origin LT has finally become a reality. Not only have the capabilities of the Origin exceed all expectations, the superior craftsmanship from our Canadian fabricators will pave the way for a new lineup of high end Canadian made mountain bikes.
Photos by Sterling Christenson
Although the frames would have been much cheaper to produce in Taiwan, we've decided to bring manufacturing home for several reasons. Our manufacturing partner has been producing high end aluminum frames for over 30 years and the attention to detail, treatment processes, and quality control of the frames will be superior to any aluminum frames on the market.
The Origin LT 170mm ( 29" or mullet) will be our first launch and the Origin ST 140mm will follow shortly after. Production will begin this fall and the first batch is estimated to deliver early 2023. We are now taking deposits for our first batch of 50 and will have 10 Limited Editions builds that will include full custom paint, component customization, factory tour, and bike build experience at Evolve HQ in Squamish, BC.
Photos are of Taiwanese prototypes, the Canadian made frames will have a hydro formed downtube, water bottle mounts, built in frame protection, modified cable routing, and head tube badge. They will be available in raw aluminum, or painted grey or black.
Frames start at $2900 and complete bikes start at $6000. More information can be found at www.evolvebikes.ca.
Pivot’s is parallel to the fork, which just looks wrong aesthetically for some reason.
Lots of frames made in China and Vietnam. Santa Cruz, Yeti, Ibis.. It's not a quality issue. I just don't like sending money to places with their human rights record when I can easily avoid it.
2017: Wilson, Spartan, Troy, Django, Hendrix, Kobain... list goes on I'm sure.
2022: Wilson, Marshall, Kobain. Are there others I'm missing? Not sure if we're counting the old run 2022 Spartan AL's.
Not sure where yess is located but I was told by evolve they.were going to be manufactured in surrey B.C
I’ll grab my coat
Mine lasted 20 hours before the damper ingested air.
Seems excessively bold, and even bashing Nicolai, Liteville etc. Does somebody have info about this, are the "already specialized in Al" famous brands only a cover for badly manufactured frames?
Ill be looking forward to getting one into NZ - might be expensive but atleast its got proper Geo and can be run in monster truck or playful(29 vs mullet, i assume this comes as a flip chip or something?)
Front grows 7%, rear 0%. I am still waiting for someone to explain to me how is that not only lazy design/manufacturing, which for 3k I find unacceptable.
When you keep pushing the RC longer you keep changing suspension leverage, For e.g when you change The rocky altitude's Wheelbase at the rear the becomes quite dead and from the time i spent on it requires a new suspension setup.
As for the whinge about lazy design/manufacturing, why would you spend the extra to please the few people from PB who are over 6ft vs the most common 5'10 sizing. medium -> large is the most common bike size.
However, having a Wheelbase flip chip at the rear axle is a good idea, infact im a huge fan of having massively adjustable bikes, 2 position flip chips are terrible idea, Give me a 15mm chip and inbetween sizes for wheelbase, Shock chips for progression and/or mullet, Something like The Patrols Headset so can dramatically change HTA - but i guess this is what id call lazy design as this gives a 1 bike scenario instead of 2 or 3, so a brand would be limiting its Market but i would also pay more for that kinda bike.
the 27.5 vs 29 debate for RC is interesting, i get why'd you'd want longer on 27.5 but at the same time short also works for suspension as its less suspension travel Arc.
Flip chips etc also alter the suspension, and can in fact have a large effect on the suspension characteristics as well as geometry and leverage/travel. So why are they a benefit when proportionate CS isn't?
the difference between 330cs and 350(taking a medium vs say an XL expectations of "growth") is huge on leverage. why would a brand want every size to Ride different ? suspension ride that is.
thats a support nightmare.
But hey if im bombing down a fire road or some sort of trail system thats straight and high speed, then hey, Big bike life but for most people thats just not going to be where they ride all the time.
Im lucky enough to ride alot of bikes just for my own personal Findings, i've ridden Most bikes available in the trail-super enduro category's at 4 different bike parks, Theres probably 1 trail in all of those four where ive said "man it would be great to Ride a bus down here"
The reason i talk about flip chips at a more extreme scale is for the sake of adjustability - so people can actually ride the same bike with the same base geo but change 1 aspect, IE a chip or chips making the chainstay longer. but being able to manually change the bike in all the ways lets you take a base line, such as this evolve and make it fit perfect, lots of bikes always have 90% good fit but lack that little bit extra.
For reference im yet to ride a Long(max i will ride given a choice is 440 on a large) CS bike thats actually made me say "this is better than those short one" they've all given me the long and lazy feeling in the back end - When i hop on anything longer than 430 i instantly feel like the back gets hung up more(thats exactly the feeling i got when i changed the Rocky altitudes Chainstay chip)
Gotta say, i pretty much agree with that whole statement.
I agree with your thoughts on CS length and how it affects the ride, but I can assure you that this is a geometry effect, not a kinematics effect, and is proportionate to the size of the rider (and therefore the rest of the bike). Hence, proportionate CS is the best compromise for keeping ride characteristics consistent across a range of frame sizes.
Further to this, changing CS length by way of a chip has to affect the kinematics. But if each size is designed to have a certain CS length, the kinematics can usually be kept almost exactly the same between sizes (if that's what the designer wants to achieve).
As an extension of that, I think it would be pretty safe to assume that most bikes with one CS length for all sizes have identical suspension layouts across all sizes. This actually results in antisquat and antirise NOT being consistent across all sizes.
But i have to agree with what Heated is saying.
Maybe @mtbtrekracer can Explain From his WC DH Mechanic experience
but thanks for the mention.
As for reference, You are 95% right, Chain stay length directly effects how your suspension reacts to Every hit, It also tends to flex alot more and it feels like the middle of the bike "sits in" more and more often - Feels like you need to run high compression and rebound to make it stand up but then comes the effects of those changes aswell.
If its any help: theres a reason most brands dont make Long chainstays... and im not getting into why.
And I'm also a taller dude buying an XL frame who wants a shorter chainstay... so I'm very off-trend and kinda bummed.
Keeping the back end the same pretty much keeps it as the same bike. Actually, it just occurred to me: I have two frames of same model but one is L and the other XL. Chainstays are 430 on both. Reach is 480 and 510 -ish. They feel nearly identical on descents, cornering is awesome on both, maybe even better with the 510 reach (weight is nicely forward). Happy to jump both. The longer reach is slighter harder to do a manual-type move on, which is why I definitely do not want a longer chainstay on the XL. When it comes to climbing the 480 reach feels way too short for me. 510 is now my minimum reach, personally, and with a steep-ish seat angle I have no wish for a longer chainstay.
Bike looks good except where the bottom of the seat tube joins the rest of the frame. Maybe that's a "prototype" solution that will get cleaned up for the production models, though.
Either way it’s a pretty sharp looking ride.