Pascal Tinner, CEO of Swiss bike brand, Gamux, swapped in for one of their injured racers to test a prototype bike on the Les Gets World Cup course last weekend. The bike is rather unique: it's CNC machined in one piece, uses a Pinion gearbox and a high pivot four-bar suspension design. World Cup photographer Ross Bell managed to grab an interview and photographs with Pascal and get the full scoop on the bike. I've edited the transcript of Ross's interview for you to read below, but here are the key details.
Interview between Ross Bell and Pascal TinnerRoss Bell:So Pascal, looks like you've been busy. What have you been working on here then?
Pascal Tinner:Yeah. So this is a first prototype of a CNC milled downhill bike that we're working on - we're trying different stuff. You know, COVID, hasn't been easy on the bike industry, so it's hard to find tubes and other things to weld frames or produce basically. So we went down another route...
This is what we came up with. Now it's just validating all the simulations we've done in CAD or 3D and then taking this and making it into the next situation, I guess.
Ross Bell:Yeah. So you guys started working on new bikes. What was it? Two, maybe three years ago?
Pascal Tinner:Two years ago. Yeah.
Ross Bell:This looks like a pretty big departure from
the one you had last year.
Pascal Tinner:Yeah. So the bike we had last year is not going away at this point. Just our main rider [Loris Michellod] has a torn ACL. So we took the opportunity with the current UCI regulations to inscribe myself, to be able to come test new things at World Cup level. You don't usually get those kinds of tracks anywhere else. So this is for sure, more towards future orientated in terms of frame production for us. We're just evaluating different things for maybe next year or the year after. The old thing isn't going away, that's a solid base and this is just where we are probably heading in the future.
Ross Bell:What did you learn this weekend on the track then? It's a pretty wild one.
Pascal Tinner:Yeah, it's a pretty wild one! She held up, nothing broke. So that's one thing that's always cool to see. And then mainly working on frame stiffness. It's quite impressive or quite obvious here when you have the slick roots what flex can do for you, and where it's actually a bad thing to have and where it's a good thing to have. So it's more fine tuning flex characteristics of the rear end versus the front triangle, to find that nice balance. You can push out of ruts and be able to be precise while still maintaining good grip levels and good... let's say, make it a bit of a sofa to ride on.
Ross Bell:And thinking back to your last bike. What were the areas you kind of look to improve on?
Pascal Tinner:First thing was sizing. I think sizing was a crucial thing we worked on. So during the development of the last iteration or the last bike, we learned quite a few things on how different angles would influence sizing requirements. So this is basically all incorporated in here just with a different manufacturing technology.
Then we also learned a few things about different rear-end systems. So we went away from
this kind of virtual pivot point system into a more conventional four bar, just because of how the braking forces interact with your riding characteristics...
And then we wanted also to try a bit more high or mid pivot to have some benefits of rearward axle path and stuff. So there's quite a few things we learned, which we tried to input into this one. But we're never at the end of the road - learning keeps on going.
Ross Bell:And the gearbox, how are you finding that?
Pascal Tinner:Yeah, at first I was a bit critical because you have the kind of a grip shift thing, but it's actually not an issue. You just need to plan your shifts a bit more. So if you f*cked up your turn, it's a bit harder to get out of because you can shift under load, but not under full load sometimes depending on which gears you're in. You need to plan a bit more, but otherwise it actually is quite a benefit for your kinematics or your suspension feeling because you have way less unsprung weight.
And there's nothing you can break. This box has been in multiple different prototypes over the last one and a half years. And I didn't do any servicing or anything. I just bent one crank while doing a 50/50, but that's not the gearbox and she's still running sweet.
Ross Bell:How was it having that weight centered and nice and low?
Pascal Tinner:I kind of compare it to driving a front engine car to a mid-engine car - your bike kind of feels way more centered. When you, for example, you would start braking, the weight shift is not as heavy, so you can expect less chassis movement basically. So that's one benefit I find. And then it tends to make the bike feel a bit more, how you say, soft and more on the ground. So you maybe consider speeding up rebound speed a little bit on the rear just to get that active feeling back. But in general, it's just having an a tractor basically for rough stuff.
Ross Bell:Then the construction as well. So I guess we've seen it maybe quite a lot in the last few years, but is it kind of similar to what Pole are doing?
Pascal Tinner:No, Pole is actually machining two half-shells and then bonding it together, which is actually I think a very, very effective way of doing things. For us it's just the bonding technology we're not on top of right now. So the main advantages for us is we don't have any welds in this. So we kind of can take simulation from the CAD file way more seriously because we don't have to factor in the welds and the welding, which weld goes after which one and all these things, and you don't need an experienced welder to make a beautiful looking frame. So this is basically me coming up with ideas, doing a lot of simulations, spending hours on the computer and then having one made, and then go...
Ross Bell:Where is it being manufactured?
Pascal Tinner:It's been manufactured in Germany actually.
Ross Bell:You guys are Swiss?
Pascal Tinner:Yeah. We're in Switzerland.
At the moment it's just me because everyone is injured and we do have an under 17 rider, a development rider, Mike Huter, who is doing fabulous at the moment. He just won his first European cup last weekend. And yeah, usually Gamux is a company with three business streams. So we do have distribution in Switzerland, for example, for Manitou, for Ohlins, for Hayes. So multiple brands. So there's a distribution business. Then we do have our frames and our consulting business where we do a lot of stuff in 3D printing, as you've seen before now in machining as well, coming up with our own frames, but also consulting other companies.
And then the third thing and it is really important to us (and that's where the passion is): racing. So yeah, we tend to come back with a bigger team in the future, but it all depends on riders, sponsorship, negotiations, and stuff like this, but for now, yeah, I'm flying the flag kind of with my testing duties. So we have a solid base for Loris and probably some other riders to start racing again next season. It's a bit unfortunate, but injuries happen. And if you have one rider, basically a one rider team in the elites. Yeah. That's the risk. But we knew that when we came into the season, but we tried to make the most out of it.
Ross Bell:In terms of adjustability, it looks like quite a few of these parts you can interchange quite quickly?
Pascal Tinner:Yeah. So there's interchangeable upper shock mounts, lower shock mounts. We can even change the bones to create different leverage ratios. And we can change the dropout. This is just a standard setting. This is also why there are CNC machined. In the future they will go to a 3D printed version just because we can produce them much, much quicker. The turnaround, instead of having a month to wait, it's like two weeks; we can change a lot of stuff very quickly.
Ross Bell:So which things are you going to end up 3D printing you think?
Pascal Tinner:Probably that piece on the rear shock mount that's in between the bones, probably top shock mount as well, and for short dropouts. I actually already have some, but we need to do some machining on them to make the axle fit and stuff.
Ross Bell:What's the next step for you guys?
Pascal Tinner:So we'll be back in Lenzerheide. We'll skip Maribor just because there's no sense in me spending a week traveling everywhere and leaving the business open. So we'll be back in Lenzerheide, probably with the next iteration of that. Just doing a lot more testing. And also it's our home World Cup, so you don't want to let a Swiss people not see what you've been doing. Then we'll see for the season after what we can come up with. There's stuff in the works, but you know, things take time and to put the signature behind it is sometimes a bit more difficult...
Ross Bell:Has it got a name yet?
Pascal Tinner:It doesn't have a name yet. It has a technical reference, which is TRP 197, which refers to the rear end travel. But yeah, it will have a name someday, but since the design will probably change quite a bit in the future...
Ross Bell:That's probably the last thing you'll do.
Pascal Tinner:Yeah. It's like a cable routing and forward bump stoppers or the place to put the stopper or something.
Ross Bell:Just those fine details?
Pascal Tinner:
It's just that you don't worry about that. And then at the last, oh f*ck, there's a double crown. So I need to put somewhere to... Oh, cable routing, oh f*ck that!
And last who are you to say that gearboxes wont continue to evolve?
Edit I'm assuming the 20 some odd guys with a pinion bike downvoted me?
Noone makes money from gearbox's that only require a simple "tune up" every 10k kms vs medieval chain and cog systems that break and needs to "be replaced as a set" constantly.
Wake up
The one thing that is no concern is the shifter. It works different than a regular deraillieur, but you do get used to it quickly. Shifting while coasting is awesome, getting stuck under load between gears 13 and 12 isn't, jumping 6 or 7 gears with one twist of the wrist is.
Still, for a downhill bike, they are a great choice if the cost can be accepted. Far better than any chain drive due to low unsprung mass and no deraillieur sticking out to the side.
My personal experience is limited to demo riding. Back to back with other enduro rigs, I couldn't tell the difference in drag in the lower gears. Maybe there was more drag in higher gears or maybe the chunky tires and long travel suspension was a greater variable than the transmission. I didn't have enough time to compare riding in higher gears to really be sure.
Shifting was instant and super smooth compared to derailleur.
I simply don't understand the wrench thing.
After three years of riding this gearbox I feel it is far from perfect - expecially in terms of price, weight, and efficiency.
Why would anyone drink the pinion kool aid and spend their hard earned money on a mediocre, expensive bike just to support some imaginary "cause"? We ride for a good time, not to feel smug about paying for someone's R&D while using a half-baked product. We're not charities.
@TheBearDen +1, asking the important questions right here. I'll bet a six-pack most people on PB who screech about gearboxes never put their money where their mouths are. In contrast, we have a dude above who has actually bought one and seems rather critical of it.
making a gearbox without drag would be equal to discovering for example how to build a viable fusion reactor.
My zerode rides better than my 2018 Santa Cruz Bronson, even though it is a touch heavier. The shifter makes perfect sense for the gearbox, and I'm not trying to be the first to the top, so any weight and drag issues aren't a concern for me.
At the end of the day, we all want to have a good time. The gearbox allows me to spend less time on maintenance, more time on the trails, and its always fun talking to other riders about new and different tech.
The reason why Pinion hasn't taken over is proprietary frames and the price.
Weight? Do I need to laugh? Weight is almost not important and on the lowest point it is even better for MTBs + unsprung mass reduction.
Weight +5lbs is laughable in % for the overall weight of the system, system includes you...
Even with 11lbs on top off my bike I would be probably 2 minutes slower for a 5mil climb ,steady 6% incline.
WOW! For an Enduro rig really theee shit!
Is everything political for you at all times?
Something has to give on the drivetrain. They will need to sell us something better to keep us buying.
Thats all I meant.
So save your political rant for a political forum this is a bike forum.
One area is that the pinion has coaxial input and output. As such, the power is always transmitted through four gears, with several sets rotating freely. Additionally, the gears have a very coarse pitch, which isn't ideal in terms of efficiency either. Then there is the interface of chainring and crank - the chainring is located between the crank and the case, meaning any dirt in there causes additional drag, since it rotates at a different speed (like in a Hammerschmidt). The gears are straight-cut, which doesn't neccessarily cause more drag, but induces vibrations in the pedals under heavy load. Combine that with the total of 18 Cogs spinning in a P1.18 (or 14 cogs in a C.12) and you have lots and lots of actual and perceived drag.
@Serpentras: Sorry, but the weight does matter. Of course it isn't super-duper-important, but it is there. 2,5kg is about 15% of a modern bike's weight. Heavier bikes feel more lazy.
Also, the main reason why Pinion hasn't taken over is Pinion. They do not sell to Consumers directly, the box is a single, sealed unit, and then the product hasn't evolved in almost ten years. Apart from the lighter case of the C line, there's nothing new in the market from them, ever. Did they ever release the trigger shifter they once promised? I haven't seen it...
Got to be a better solution to keeping chain clean?
It is possible to keep it clean, but that is an other story?
A lot of weight could be removed from gearbox gearing or used on E-bikes?
Yeah how should they sell the box to the customers direct? I also don't see Shimano doing their motor's or others direct.
Can't say anything about evolving...
But I can say the same about derailleurs. Electronic do nothing more then mechanical. The only thing they could do is not there or did you see a self adjusting deraileur? Or that it will set it self or manual to either right or left side of the cog to make it crisp for every cog again because damage to any component.
I was being nice because this is about bikes./
But rest assured you are my enemy. And I treat you as such.
100% guarantee you say jack shit to my face.
We can go pm and exchange addresses mr badass.
My triggers are on my hips.
What do you think I would do to you?
Only slightly related, could someone please clue me in - is it, and if yes how much more wasteful is CNC machining?
Every time I see a cubic meter of material grinded down to a screw I just can't help but wince and think - there has to be a better way. I get that not everything can be made of tubes and it makes sense for engines, motors and one-off prototypes.
I suppose the waste material could be recycled, but to what degree and does it get recycled?
Like, if all bike manufacturing switched to CNC are we going to face alloy shortage or surplus?
Of course the recycling process uses quite some energy which is most likely derived from fossil fuels... but its better than carbon haha
However, I wonder how much of that was based on the ability to source waste aluminum of an exact grade and without impurities. Maybe machining these solid blocks produces enough waste of consistent material and quality to actually be worth recycling into new billets.
Hopefully someone with some materials engineering experience can chime in here.
As others have noted, energy to recycle is a big hit, but tech linked above,
using solar energy to melt down scrap,
could be gamechanger for more neutral resource loop.
Bamboo bike probably is the way to go if you're looking for most neutral material...
dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/10161/8483/Duke_MP_Published.pdf This is to my knowledge the only peer-reviewed research into bicycle frame environmental impacts. It has its flaws though. First Specialized sponsored it (so there's something in it for them to consider the carbon frame more environmentally friendly), second it doesn't account for the molds being made to produce carbon frames, and it doesn't make any mention of the product life cycle (how long is it good for and what happens to it when it is deemed "no longer good").
One wat the bike industry can make headway is in the optimization of non virgin material. Example, headset spacers they don't need to be virgin material. Would be nice to see a big company make an effort to make a carbon neutral bike through offsetting the cost to use virgin frame tubes by using non virgin materials in other places.
Yeah, haha, I don't live with the idea that biking is in any way 'green'. When compared to a lifted truck commuter - sure, but I burn through at least a set of tires every season which aren't very eco, pads, other parts.
At least my current alloy bike turns 6 this year so that's something, but it'll probably get swapped next season so there's that. (that's not out of love for Mother Earth, I just couldn't afford a new one earlier)
Bamboo, I'm sure we'll mess that up as well if we're to scale it up for the sake of profit with dirty plantation, workforce exploitation and who knows what else. Would be a cool case study though.
Looking for the day someone with a homemade Bamboo bike qualifies Top20 at the DH race, that'd be something!
@samnation Thanks for that, I'll get on with it tonight. Wonder how much out of date would it be since 2014 was already a while ago and we seem to be living through a Renaissance in the MTB world at least.
I think I have a relative small footprint, don't shop excessively, don't have a car, no AC, don't drink coffee or other such drinks, don't smoke, avoid other junk food and we try to buy mostly loose veggies/fruits etc.
We have 3 mid sized Ikea trash bins for metal/glass, packaging and paper, and take them out roughly once a month, or less often, apart from bio waste of course.
That's just to give you an idea of my lifestyle and waste production.
Trying to buy once but quality and maintain/repair things instead of buying new when possible.
Now the less eco part. I'm a 3D Artist, I have a powerful workstation PC which is on 90% of the time, and half of that it's rendering or simulating something, which means it runs at full throttle.
My electricity has gone up 170% compared to last year since I've been working from home.
I get a season Ski pass and use lifts, in good seasons close to 100 days per year.
I also get a Gravity Card and while not a real park rat I also do a good amount of that (yet, still suck, but that's another topic).
So, I guess that puts me on par with someone who has a less economical car, drinks 3 lattes per day, has a stream of Amazon packages and is into fast fashion...
It seems to end up in toothpaste so I guess it's all good.
If you want to do something worthwhile for the environment, stop consuming tons of shit you don't need.
One methane pocket thawing in Siberia does more in regards to climate change than all cars on earth.
Plastic in the ocean is far worse than some climate change that may or may not make it worse in some way, while the oceans are quite literally dying from plastic and overfishing.
Apart from the points you raised already - longevity of the product, molds etc. There are a few things that I find really striking so far.
- Reliance on honesty: I may be too cynical, but I have massive issues with that - way too many personal and corporate interests and stakes too high to blindly believe some guys email that says: "Production Plant green 98%, Waste 1.5%, Thank you for your inquiry."
- Data collection issues (also noted by the team themselves) - only 4 of the 19 suppliers participated in the study. This is a major one, I hope things have changed since 2014, but there should be an International Body that has the authority to ask and receive relevant to environmental impact data. Because "Hey, can we see what's up so we breath cleaner air?" , "No, sorry, we're busy." simply doesn't cut it.
- At least some of the processes can be made more efficient through the use of renewable energy sources and innovation, but there are simply no incentives to do so. Solar, Wind, that solar oven that @blcpdx linked earlier could alleviate some of the issues right away (yes, they have their own manufacturing issues but it's still better than coal mines).
- Some comparisons were a little funky, there was something like all Allez frames produced in a year cost enough energy to power NYC for 128 hours. That's like saying all the coal mines in China produce enough power to run all tanks of WW2 for a week or something
Thanks again for sharing! Let's see what else I find curious in the last 120 pages
If anyone else knows of a more recent such study, please share!
However using bamboo & bio plastic is an other level of natural!
What if... stay with me here guys... what if we just carve the whole thing out of a big block of aluminum?
What about Isak Leivsson racing finals on a steel frame he not only designed but welded himself?
Weight doesn't matter that much. Even for the Enduro Bros!
I also dont get it how you could say AL is just more heavy than carbon ect.
Look how f*cking light Liteville is! Look how f*cking heavy the Norco Range is. My Privateer 161 P3 (L) with beefed up 1,45kg Schwalbe tires and coil converted Fork and rear coil shock, 223x2,25mm discs is about 16,5kg. Meaning my overall weight for my maybe 6k overall bike build is less then the latest and said greatest Enduro bike for almost 10k..... But to be honest all my parts are better or at the same level except the frame and maybe hubs.
To be clear I dont rant about the frame, I do about the whole bike. I probably will test that Range if its finally here and if it is good I will maybe buy it if there isn't a Pinon bike ready to kill it
Let’s put a two pulley thing at a point equally if not more vulnerable than a derailleur.
Probably cheaper to replace, but you’re still walking out of the woods.
I would use just the tension spring, hit it hard enough on the lower pully that the tensioner spring will snap and the lower part will rotate to the back upwards. Just replace it trailside and your good to go. I never hit my frame on this spot so I dont think it would be a big problem for me..
Most hits on my derailleur are hits from the side. No chance to hit that tensioner in my case also.
Nice Bike imho!
The Brain reads: "Paint Thinner"
Come on, time to edit out the interview comment that the low bike weight makes any difference!!
All for the sake of " pop " of of jumps. Maybe learn how to ride and let the bike do what it is supposed to do . Give you traction.