First Look: Bold Linkin Trail

Apr 10, 2015
by Paul Aston  
Bold Cycles isn't a household name, but it looks like they're coming into the mountain bike arena with the intention of turning heads. Their new Linkin Trail bike houses a DT Swiss shock inside the carbon frame, which Bold claim has never been done before. We have a more in-depth look planned for the near future, but for now take a look at the press release from the new Swiss company.


Bold Cycles Linkin Trail

Bold – the new Swiss bicycle brand presents its Internal Suspension Technology, as a world first.

Swiss newcomer Bold Cycles Ltd. presents its bicycle brand Bold and its Internal Suspension Technology as a world first: The rear shock has been entirely integrated into the seat tube. The public launch of the first Linkin Trail model will be held at Solothurn’s Bike Days bicycle festival from May 8th to 10th 2015. As per the same date the web shop will be open for online orders at www.boldcycles.com.

Bold Cycles Linkin Trail

With the Bold brand the team around Vincenz Droux and Oliver Kreuter present a world premier regarding frame design and suspension kinematics for mountain bikes: With its system integrated Internal Suspension Technology kinematics, abbreviated as IST, the rear shock has been entirely built into the frame, driven by a set of links. As one of the first companies worldwide the start-up is also early with another concept, as the frame has been built to fit both 29-inch wheels and the new 27.5plus size – depending on the intended use, expected trail characteristics and individual preferences. All these new developments will be presented in form of the initial offering Linkin Trail that combines state-of-the-art EPS frame building technology with the Boost 148 standard in the back and the stiffer wheels that result from this. With Bold Cycling Ltd. the Swiss bicycle industry spawns a promising newcomer.


Invisible shock damper thanks to «Internal Suspension Technology»


Bold Cycles Linkin Trail
Bold Cycles Linkin Trail
IST: the initial offering «Linkin Trail» packs the rear shock into the frame’s seat tube.

As the name promises our kinematics that offer a full 130mm (5 inches) of travel in the rear does not simply position the rear shock in the frame’s main triangle but rather builds it neatly into the seat tube. Not visible from the outside, the shock is driven by a patent-pending set of links. Thanks to the «IST» technology the frame does not just serve as a structural element but also as a tough skin to protect the shock from weather, loose rocks and dirt. Apart from the clean looks and aesthetics, integrating the entire suspension into the frame has some additional advantages. With the frame’s kinematics new links positioning is possible adding both to the stiffness and to a suspension platform that is fully active under drivetrain and braking forces. As the rear shock is not connected to the frame’s top tube either, every frame size can be designed to meet the exact needs. This means that even a small frame fits a full-size water bottle while offering a low-slung top tube and heaps of standover clearance. The low centre of gravity resulting from the compact, stiff linkages of the rear suspension further add to the solid handling characteristics. Convinced by the IST kinematics and the related concept, DT Swiss has stepped in as technology partner and has built a shock that has been taylor-made for the needs of Bold with the DT Swiss X313 customized.

Bold Linkin Trail
Bold Linkin Trail

First offering Linkin Trail

As per Summer 2015 the Linkin Trail as first model of the Linkin premium line will be available in four different specifications. The bike comes with 29-inch wheels as a standard. Customers get to choose from four different specifications and build options, three frame sizes and three stem lengths. As for the clear-coated carbon frames, sticker sets in the colours red, light grey and turquoise are offered. The products will be sold via the web shop under www.boldcycles.com and are being assembled in Lengnau, Switzerland. Packed in a premium
wooden box, customers get their mountain bike delivered to their doorstep within three weeks’ time. If they wish so, delivery to a selected specialist retailer is an option too. A free first service within six months after the purchase is included in the retail price.

Bold Linkin Trail
Bold Linkin Trail

The Linkin Trail will be presented to the public and available for test rides for the first time at the Swiss bicycle festival Bike Days which is held in Solothurn from May 8th to 10th 2015. At the same time the web shop under www.boldcycles.com will go online.

Bold Cycles Linkin Trail
Bold Cycles Linkin Trail


About Bold Cycles Ltd

Bold Cycles Ltd is a Swiss company based in Lengnau, close to Biel, and has been founded in 2014 by Vincenz Droux and Robert Droux. Vincenz Droux is well known within the bicycle industry as the owner of Flow AG. He has been involved in the development of products and brand images for a number of international and national bicycle manufacturers. As former co-founder and manager of a corporate design agency Oliver Kreuter is the best possible addition: Engineering, graphic design and brand development are taken care off by only two persons – a promising team. The company develops and sells mountain bikes under the Bold brand. On a long term the company intends to expand into the road bike segment.

Author Info:
astonmtb avatar

Member since Aug 23, 2009
486 articles

165 Comments
  • 142 6
 At first I was like.. then I was all, then I read boost and scrolled to the comments
  • 9 1
 I did the same exact thing...
  • 27 4
 What's sure, it's that ONE DAY, we all will have boost ... and it sucks. F*ck mtb industry
  • 65 0
 I did not think we would need x-ray glasses to check sag. Mtb industry is way ahead of us.
  • 32 15
 You guys realize a few years back everyone was bitching about 142x12 and now everyone has it? Even cyclocross bikes have it. And we're happy to have it.

Boost seems like less of an improvement, but I don't really get the hate. And I just dropped $500 on 142x12 hubs, still don't care that a new standard is coming.
  • 17 0
 I don't change wheels, frames, or forks nearly as much as tires, so boost is far less jarring than 27.5... Boost can merrily piss off and I'll still be doing what I want. As long as there are current hubs around, and talented wheel builders, I see this one being far less of an issue. I still can't figure out what the draw is for this frame though...a shock you can't tune just to keep it a little cleaner and make the bike look good? Oh bottle cage! There are plenty of normal FS designs that allow for a bottle cage already. I read the entire article and they never addressed proper shock tuning. Maybe you have to take your seatpost out every time you want to change your rebound... =/ Different for the sake of being different? This is a solution in search of a problem, or more likely a problem in search of a problem.
  • 38 1
 everyones bitchin about boost and '26 dying', im loving it. cheap 26 stuff and 135/142 hubzzz Smile
  • 18 4
 26 may not be dying, but I still have to order my 26" inch tires off of Amazon... Razz

Bike shop near my house only has Maxxis 26" tires in downhill casings. It's all 27.5 in the trail stuff. Stupid, but true.
  • 46 1
 I think I'll buy it just for the box it comes in.
  • 39 6
 when I find a bike shop that stops selling 26 stuff like tires, I stop going there and am happy to buy off the internet instead.

I also hate their excuses as to why they do not carry them anymore. But they still have 20" BMX and 24" tires.

I have three 2013 26" MTB's, It's ridiculous. F'ck em
  • 4 3
 I have a banshee phantom with 12x142 (Almost opted for the 12x150 drop outs) with enve m70 and i cant imagine needing a stiffer wheel but thankfully if I need it im sure a frame design like the banshee will be able to accomodate this "new standard"

Honestly i just want to be riding my bike right now, rant over.
  • 3 3
 I'm doing just that rt now, Just fckn ride!
  • 30 8
 26" for life!
  • 2 0
 hey ktmrider-how do you like your phantom? i've blown apart my trek superfly sl for the 2nd time. thinking about making a switch.
  • 16 6
 26" or nothing !
  • 11 2
 Put yourselves in the shoes of the people making this bike. If you were chancing your life savings (or a chunk of investors cash) on producing a new high end mountain bike with a fancy avant garde design would you not adopt the latest standards?

I'm not sure you can expect these folks to fight back against emerging standards that you're not sold on
  • 5 3
 Why the new standards? The old work very well. Smile Then, a lot of new standards are just marketingWink
  • 8 5
 As someone who builds his own wheels I welcome Boost, as it will make tensioning the wheel a lot more uniform. Going from 135 to 142 did nothing but change the axle (your flanges are in the exact same spots!) I love the design, and the ideas behind it, and will definitely be watching these as they hit the ground and people start riding them.
  • 8 1
 @Alias530, you are right people did bitch about 142, however before 142, frames were 135 or 150 for a long time, now it seems they're changing stuff too frequently. Also with 142 you could adapt most hubs with cheap simple end caps, and not buy a new wheel. Boost makes buy new wheels, front and back, and also a new fork.
  • 13 1
 I'm clicking these kind of articles just to see the comments anyway. There is nothing for me here for at least couple of years with all those carbon frames, zillion hub standards, bigger wheels and so on. Mountain bike is no longer pure fun and freedom if you look at these articles. It's just an industry which is trying to sell more and more... and even more, without even care what people are looking for or can afford. For me mountain biking is not saving a few grams or gaining a few seconds here and there. I wish a bike that is fun to ride and easy to maintain and no need to buy a new bike everytime someone released a new standard. I'm really sad to see where this sport is going nowadays.
  • 2 1
 This isn't the same as 135qr to 142x12. That added a significant improvements, a though axle and tabs for easy alignment in the frame. Also, hubs could be converted between the two because hub bodies were the same. They only needed new end caps.
  • 8 0
 Significant improvements? Come on. I'd doubt both of these words in this sentence. In fact 148 is said to fix a problems bike manufacturers have with 29" wheels. I don't ride 29er so I cannot tell if this is true, but it's seems to be pointless for everything smaller. I ride a bike with 135 thru axle that can be replaced with stiffer 142x12 thru axle and fitting the wheel is so easy that it can be done by a 7 years old kid. If you want to go further there is already a 150mm rear axle available on the market. How it is 148mm superior to that? Significatly? No absolutely f**kin' way.
  • 3 1
 Yeah I don't really get the point of 148mm when 150mm exists already. I get that 148 or 150 would theoretically be stiffer than 142 but why the need for both?
  • 4 1
 I am still riding my 135x9mm rear Formula E-Hub on a Supra MT I bought second hand 9 years ago. I have only cleaned it once and put a 10mm hard axle 4 years ago so that it would be harder to steal.I had the hub on my FR bike back in the day, then ony DH bike, then on my DJ bike and now I just revamped the paint and built another DJ bike with it. FUCK them standards, I ride because it's fun and I trust my components fully! I might chane the hub for something else but I doubt it, not after qriting this sentence and remembering all that I have been through with that hulk of a wheel. Just ride and stop reading, ignorance is bliss. Ignorance is bliss!
  • 10 0
 I don't get everyone saying that 27.5" has dropped the prices on 26" bikes. Looking through the PB ad people still are asking a ton of money for their 26" bikes.
  • 1 0
 @upchuckyeager The Phantom is an awesome bike! I have no complaints. Its done everything i've pointed it at and begs to be ridden hard. If you would like to know more feel free to message me
  • 4 0
 And have fun stacking those bike boxes Bike shops
  • 3 4
 Why all the whining about Boost? Things change sometime for the better and sometimes not so much. But Boost can only help the stability of the bike. Just test road a Fuel EX 9,8 . Not sure if it mattered. But the bike was extremely stable more so then other similar bikes. Test road a new Mach 4 just after the Fuel. Seemed like the entire rear end of the Mach 4 was flexing and did not have the stability of the Fuel. I have not ridden last years Fuel without the Boost. So I cannot compare the two bikes. But, I can say that it does work now.
  • 2 0
 Just lay them flat? No?
  • 4 1
 148 includes 3.5 mm per side for the extended end cap "hub catchers" but the effective hub flange width is based on 141. That's 3mm wider flanges per side over 135

Remember the difference between 135 and 142 is merely 3.5 per side in hub catchers and the cassette location and flange width is the same.

Flange width potential ~ w/hub catching endcaps
135 ~ 142
141 ~ 148
150 ~ 157

You have to compare 148 to 157 (not 150)
  • 130 2
 Will there be linkin park version?
  • 6 2
 ^^genius
  • 10 1
 Yea and also a special edition in collaboration with Mike Shinoda and Fort Minor.
  • 7 14
flag jfeust (Apr 10, 2015 at 9:41) (Below Threshold)
 Ya, or a LinkedIn Profile for the bike.
  • 5 0
 I came to the comments to see whether this or boost hate topped the list. Perhaps next time everyone will opt for the pun instead of the standard rhetoric.
  • 2 4
 Oh, no! Another cry baby bike!
  • 4 1
 The linkin park edition is a 26er. The linkin road is the 29er.
  • 46 1
 I don't know how practical that is, but IT IS SO SEXY!
  • 6 0
 Pretty slick design for sure
  • 1 0
 That's Swiss engineering for ya. It's a thing of beauty! Just curious how many Swiss Franks this will set one back?
  • 2 0
 It's the exact opposite of the Redalp abomination.
  • 2 3
 Well not all Swiss engineering looks as good as this www.redalp.com/EN/bikes.php!!!
  • 4 0
 Holy smoke .what happened to keeping a low centre of gravity? jeez. looks like someone flipped over an old rm9 and went to town
  • 1 0
 Haha, good point @EmilMP!
  • 1 0
 But.... "Redalp Bikes are therefore faster over rocks, roots and square bums". (www.redalp.com/EN/technology.php)
  • 39 3
 So it's a boost 148 frame that you cant change shock pressure or fllip your shock lockout?

what we have here is a game changer
  • 1 10
flag alexsin (Apr 10, 2015 at 7:20) (Below Threshold)
 Not if you're tall it ain't.
  • 17 0
 ^^^ does not get sarcasm
  • 6 3
 >>> I don't get sarcasm either.
  • 16 0
 "Excuse me sir, can you tell me where I could get some sarcasm?"
  • 11 0
 Sarcasm is like 148 mm back that way
  • 3 13
flag alexsin (Apr 10, 2015 at 15:13) (Below Threshold)
 I'm being sarcastic in response to his sarcasm. I am surprised to have to explain this.
  • 4 0
 Hmm I dunno
  • 9 0
 @ alexsin

what is truly befuddling, then, is the fact that your comment was in no way sarcastic whatsoever. i am surprised that i have to explain this.
  • 35 1
 Decent geometry, super sleek look. Space for a like 5 water bottles. Me likey

But what happens if I want to service my shock? Adjust the rebound? Change the air pressure? Check my sag? Run a different shock all together? It looks like that might be... difficult. Me no likey.

This is mtb, form should always follow function, not the other way around.
  • 1 0
 That's a good lookimg bike.

Probably in the pipeline is an electronic shock sag/compression/damping adjuster with handlebar mounted LCD screen for instant on the fly adjustments.
  • 3 0
 enjoy your 48 pound carbon fiber frame!!!! don't you just love water bottles.
  • 2 0
 Looks like the bash plate will double as access to the shock, but agree it will take a bit longer. Moto's measure sag by seat height measurements so that isn't a problem.
  • 34 6
 Want a bike that looks as good as this? just buy a hardtail Razz
  • 26 3
 That is one sleek looking bike... Rear shock hidden in the frame does wonders for the aesthetics... Might add some extra time between services.
  • 11 10
 Or suspension oil may get too hot too soon and this might add some extra services between times.
  • 3 2
 Or, how do you flip the compression lever. Or, how do you get a shock replacement in 5 years when this one dies.
  • 2 0
 It's so advanced they gave it TWO derailleurs!
  • 22 1
 So Much respect for the guts of these guys. In a world where big companys have spent hundreds of thousands on their bikes development. Bold says f# 'em we are gonna build a Carbon twentyniner with the shock out of sight Which Looks slick as a babybutt and They succeeded. I take off my hat for you guys!
  • 24 0
 Does integrate shock into frame, doesn't do stealth dropper seatpost routing?
  • 3 0
 First thing I noticed. wtf?
  • 2 0
 First thing I noticed too!
  • 1 0
 Yes they stuffed up the design there, all frames should have stealth dropper routing.
  • 16 2
 Why on earth would I want to hide my rear shock?

So it gets impossible to adjust on the fly and more work to service?
  • 1 2
 If you don't know the answer to that you will never know...
  • 13 1
 I want to see the suspension linkage and how it works.
  • 4 1
 its just a modified 4 bar. Not sure how the shock is activated though.
  • 1 0
 I think the top link may have s part that goes inside the frame. You can see that it definetly gets wider at that point.
  • 10 0
 I thought this was 2015 not 2050
  • 9 1
 Bold move! Seriously though this bike looks awesome. Not gonna be cheap though Gonna make it hard to measure sag to...
  • 7 1
 it is possible to put a gauge on the frame that would follow the linkage, BMC does it, among other companies. Specialized has an auto adjusting sag system that works, i'm sure they weren't asleep when they designed this...
  • 7 0
 If internal suspension is combined with internal gearbox and will look as clean as this then the MTB world will have something worthy to talk about.
  • 2 2
 Another unreal expectation from an armchair engineer.
  • 5 0
 This is quite an interesting idea for those of us who rarely adjust our shocks and ride in a lot of crappy weather. Not like I'm rushing out to buy one, but I'll read the reviews with interest
  • 3 0
 My girlfriend would absolutely love that bike.. I can imagine her saying: Looks comfortable, and hasn't got that annoying spring in the middle of the frame.. > I would recommend to stop worrying about new standards. Everything is changing, it was always this way. Just pick something and stick to it for the next couple of years. Will save you a bit of headache (:
  • 4 1
 I got some issues with the Boost thing (which isn't necessarily an issue if the bike comes with nice hubs) and the internal shock (which is kind of a hassle but once you're dialled you really can forget it, and I don't really use my lockout) and the fact that it doesn't come in XL (presumably there's no tall people in Switzerland?). But I like it. I think it's an interesting idea. In a world of carbon construction stuff like this should be possible. It makes for very nice lines.
  • 2 0
 I assume the reason for not making an XL is the same as most other brands. Figures normally suggest about 2% of sales are XL.

Especially for a new brand, dropping $100k on a XL mould is pretty risky.
  • 3 0
 Bike companies will forever make a new widget. My passion for biking tends to make me look at their practice of new products as so predatory. My ability to break stuff is my issue. Then some things cannot be replaced except with some new standard. In reality I love the innovation. My reality is that new equipment does not make me ride better. The companies prey on my insatiable appetite for innovation for my bike and biking in general. But, the companies are like every other industry, just trying to make a living and paying the bills. Nice bike. My reality is, I enjoy my local bike shop and the employees there.
  • 7 0
 Should be fun to work on
  • 1 0
 Looks painful for home mechanics without knowing how that rear linkage works...
  • 4 0
 Bold is not the first. Boulder Bikes put a shock in the frame a long time ago.

www.pinterest.com/pin/525021269031714077
  • 4 0
 Yep. It could also be argued that Manitou had their shocks built into their seatstays ;-) And then there's all the soft tails....Moots etc.
  • 1 0
 oh my. remember staring at that one reading mtbaction. look how times have changed...
  • 2 0
 I understand they are trying to protect the shock, but there has to be an opening in the frame somewhere for the linkage to attach to the shock, so to me that says, dirt trap, get all kinds of dirt inside the frame and have a pain in the butt to clean it out.
  • 1 0
 I imagine an upper link in two parts, one actuated by the swingarm, the other linked to the shock. They are linked together with a shaft, like a crankarm, and there is bearing and seals between to keep the frame "closed".
  • 1 0
 I would hope they used some sort of grommet or seal to keep dirt out because if not that could lead to problems
  • 2 0
 Are they bold enough to have canecreek DBinline OEM?

Joke apart, it's a sweet looking bike by the way.
Integration may be a smart move thought with a set-and-forget type of setup.
  • 5 1
 So this is their trail bike....does that mean the more DH-friendly version will be called the Linkin Park?
  • 4 0
 Looks fantastic! Are there any x-ray style shots to see the layout of the shock/linkage? PB review please?
  • 4 1
 Gearbox? Come on this is the one inovation we all really want.

But instead we get a fantastic hidden shock, never even knew I wanted this?
  • 2 0
 "As one of the first companies worldwide the start-up is also early with another concept..."

Hey guys, this is one of the first companies worldwide! They must know what they're doing!
  • 1 0
 Looks awesome, fair play for thinking outside the box. But I have two issues, going through the trouble of hiding the shock and then no stealth routing for the dropper post and no xl size, I'm 6ft 6 this looks like and awesome trail/am bike and no xl size, wtf!!!!! And also to pb readers, the downtube protection comes off to to access the shock, how do you think they attach the shock after they make the frame?
  • 2 0
 Bike coffin, why has this only been invented now? If i'd known sooner i could have given my 26, 27.5, 29ers suitable burials before moving on 29++ and 148 - -, rehsus negative, etc
  • 1 0
 It looked cool before I read the shock is internal, and then it looked even cooler. There was something nice and new in the looks and I did not realize the shock is out of sight though it obviously is a FS. Anything that makes a difference in the maintenance of the shocks is wellcome. I wait the day we all ride shocks without oils and O-rings, before that it's nice to get them out of mud and dust at least...
  • 5 3
 Nice, clean look...

... but with those "standards" and a "tailor made" (aka proprietary and probably almost impossible to replace and upgrade) shock?

Thanks, but no thanks
  • 4 3
 Wait so how do you get a shock pump in there to adjust the pressure? And once that's done, you'd need to measure sag via axle-to-saddle measurements, moto bike style. Seems dumb and inconvenient IMO
  • 10 0
 I assume you remove the guard on the bottom of the down tube to access the shock. Its has a suspicious bulge in the guard which I guess is the end of the shock.
  • 4 0
 "As the name promises our kinematics that offer a full 130mm (5 inches) of travel in the rear does not simply position the rear shock in the frame’s main triangle but rather builds it neatly into the seat tube."
  • 3 0
 Shocks are at least 8 in long nowdays. I'm sure most of it is in that bulge in the seat tube and the dials are at the bulge in the removable guard on the downtube.
  • 3 0
 I usually stay away from suspicious bulges.
  • 4 0
 I was hoping to see the Linkin Park bike soon
  • 5 5
 i was stoked on it until i read the geometry chart and "DT Swiss has stepped in as technology partner and has built a shock" - ability to run suspension that's not DT Swiss is essential to my bicycling experience - can't fit a cane creek... can't fit in my garage....
  • 9 7
 Because we all know dt Swiss is a crappy company that makes shit product right( eyes roll) some people just like to whine
  • 5 4
 yeah - they do make a shit product when it comes to suspension - damping performance (especially in rear shocks) is nowhere near the modern products from companies like rockshox or fox - the old stuff compared only slightly better - ive ridden their suspension, ive owned their hubs and ive moved on to other companies that know how to build a proper product
  • 6 0
 There was a time when Rock Shox, Fox, Marzocchi, Manitou have all times of being thought of as behind the times or subpar performance. Yet at one time, each of these has been considered the best and the cycle still continues. Not long ago Rock Shox was considered old tech and Fox was the bees knees, now Pike is the go to and not the 36. Maybe DT has been doing a lot of R&D and has some new tech?
  • 2 0
 If that's the case, that'll be awesome to see! I want to like their range of suspension stuff, but topping out at 150mm max travel on forks ain't enough.
  • 1 0
 Dt Swiss are solid enough. I've been very happy with my fancy carbon can
  • 5 1
 What if the shock needs servicing?!
  • 1 0
 really I doubt they moulded the frame with a shock inside.
  • 3 0
 It's like kinder-surprise !
  • 1 0
 There appears to be an access hatch on the downtube near the bottom bracket.
  • 1 0
 Faaaaaaack me that shit is cleeeeean yo! I love that front triangle.

Build me a no derailleur slope version & take my fvckin' scrilla!

Is there anything that Switzerland doesn't kick ass at?
  • 3 0
 Decent exchange rates for non-Suisse people?
  • 1 0
 " frame does not just serve as a structural element but also as a tough skin to protect the shock from weather, loose rocks and dirt" Don't know how many times I said to myself, I wish my rear shock was more protected :-).
  • 4 1
 How do you service/replace the shock?
  • 2 0
 I'll take ease of maintenance over sleek appearances and new so-called technologically advanced hubs
  • 4 0
 LinkedIn
  • 3 0
 what do you do when you have to change the shock?
  • 4 2
 Please don't write bold statements of this bike before you actually ride it
  • 7 4
 Boost? Bold; go and f*ck yourselves.
  • 2 3
 Maybe the idea behind the hidden shock is for people like me, that could hop on and go for a cruise. I don't even know what sag, stiffness, lockout is, I ride a hard tail but have always thought about switching to a full suspension. Seems like a good bike to make that transition on.
  • 5 0
 If you just want to ride the bike and ignore suspension setup, you can do that whether the shock is visible or not...
  • 4 0
 1ST APRIL ???
  • 3 0
 They should have named it the Bold "Conversation Starter".
  • 6 3
 More plastic shit!! Just what we need. Bring on the neg head props!!
  • 1 0
 beautiful bike, I wonder if it will make it stateside? The geometry and travel are perfect! most of the time a 5" bike is the best all around choice.
  • 2 0
 The BOOST on a new framework ??? Evidence that manufacturers communicate with each other ...
  • 4 1
 Magic?
  • 2 0
 What happens if the shock is blown ? Or if you want another shock?
  • 1 0
 how do you get to the shock......????? ya know..for service and tuning and what not
  • 2 0
 The bike is cool and all, but the box it comes in, I want for my bike!!
  • 2 0
 Always good to see innovation in the industry
  • 1 3
 Has any of you road a 27.5? I have the new reign and its night and day how the old one road. Things progress it is how the world works. Remember when disk brake came around that was such a poor decision and then when they went from 6" to 8" what were they thinking? Just ride what you like to ride. Too much hate in this world why hate on inanimate objects.
  • 6 0
 My road bike is a 700c. I rode my 27.5 on the trails
  • 1 0
 Interesting spin on suspension tech. The bike looks hot! I have that Raceface Next crank it has good power transfer.
  • 2 0
 Is this a late April fools post?
  • 1 0
 How do they stop crap entering the frame where the linkage enters,would be nice to see that part of the bike.
  • 1 0
 It looks like it is done at a pivot point. An over-sized pivot axle is probably attached to a small arm on the inside to drive the shock.
  • 1 0
 Good to be developing new ideas and all that but tbh id rather wank my dad off that ride a boost
  • 1 0
 So they managed to hide the chock but they couldn't work out a stealth dropper... Good job! At least spec a KS LEV
  • 1 0
 I didn't know the bike was so "premounted" in a box! that's cool!
  • 2 1
 No idea of how this bike would ride but that thing is cool.
  • 3 3
 I'd rather have a cheaper ugly shock inside the frame than a nice shiny exposed one.
  • 1 1
 That's what she said
  • 2 1
 When it breaks, can u Push it ?
  • 1 0
 Beautiful bike! Hope the shock comes with a remote!
  • 1 0
 When will they finally bury the front derailleur FFS?
  • 1 0
 The Cable routing is pretty cool
  • 1 1
 They go through all the trouble to hide the shock and make it clean sexy package and then put a front derailleur on it?
  • 1 0
 I came here for the comments
  • 1 0
 how the hell are you going to mantein the rear shock....
  • 1 1
 Doesn't make any sense.. its not April 1st. ¬_¬
  • 2 2
 Looks shit hot, bet the swiss shock is wank though.
  • 1 1
 aaaaand it has been done before:
www.facebook.com/pages/Tramontane-Cycles
  • 1 0
 no 26"
  • 3 5
 box - cool
susp design = trek
hidden ammo - looks cool, however reminds me DT swith ammo's on the Scott...
  • 1 1
 Thats an amazing desing
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.053720
Mobile Version of Website