While other brands are pushing for mixed wheeled trail bikes, Giant's newest generation Trance X is built around dual 27.5" wheels on a chassis delivering 145 mm of travel with a 160 mm fork.
The lineup consists of three models starting at $2,850 USD, except for Australia, which will only have two options. Looking closer, you'll find that there are four frame sizes; S, M, L, XL, but no carbon options.
Trance X Details• Aluminum frame
• Travel: 145 mm / 160 mm fork
• Dual 27.5"
• Seatstay pivot flip-chip
• 63.8-64.5 degree head angle
• 433 mm / 430 mm chainstays
• Size: S, M, L, XL
• Price: $2,850 - $4,500 USD
•
giant-bicycles.com Giant says that speed and style is what drove the design of the new Trance X, and that's apparent when you look at the geometry table. Giant gives the option to tweak geometry with a flip chip at the seatstay pivot, dropping the head angle down to 63.8º with short 433 mm chainstays in the low setting.
Frame DetailsTo soak up bumps large and small, Giant used their well known Maestro suspension design. Utilizing their Aluxx SL-Grade aluminum and a one piece composite rocker link to stiffen things up, the Trance X delivers 145 mm of travel via a 185 mm x 55 mm Trunnion mount shock. By arranging the suspension in this configuration and using a shorter shock, Giant's engineers were able to lower leverage ratio and shorten the chainstays, all while dropping the center of gravity. Specs like a press fit bottom bracket and 148 Boost rear wheel spacing are standard practice by now. Finishing things off are a rubberized chainstay, a downtube protector and internally routed housings, and an accessory mount under the top tube.
Geometry
Models and PricingThe budget-friendly Trance X 3 features a RockShox Yari RC with a Motion Control damper, Shimano Deore brakes and shifting components, topped off with Giant components like wheels and cockpit. Another $900 for the Trance X2 will get you a Fox Rhythm 36, SRAM NX Eagle drivetrain, TranzX adjustable dropper post, which can be boosted up to 200 mm of drop. At the top of the ladder sits the Trance X 1 with a SRAM GX drivetrain, Code R brakes, and burlier Giant TR-1 wheels.
All the models use roll on 2.6 Maxxis Assegai and Minion DHR II tire, as well as Fox DPS shocks, except the Trance X 1, which gets a Float X rear shock and Fox 36 Performance Elite fork with a Grip 2 damper.
-Alu frame
-Tiny ass wheels
-Cheap af
-Black
-Maxxis tires/tyres
-Pressfit BB...Wait. What?! Pressfit BB?! This bike is garbage, never mind!
- also water bottle mounts
Granted BB30 was a bit shit, as was PF30, but PF92 works just fine and I've had zero problems with it on any of my bikes, nor any of my customer's bikes with just one exception.
I've had two bikes with press fit, both have done thousands of kms with no creaks and have just needed some grease in the bearings
I had a look at the exploded view of the range and holy cow this frame is insane in terms of details. The part count is through the roof!
BB86/92 basically takes the dimensions of thread-in cups and adds them to the frame. I've never had a problem with these designs.
BB30 is a different story but at least its cheap and quick to change the bearings.
PF is objectively superior to threaded, in theory, the problem is that people keep buying overpriced garbage.
Price =/= quality
It was my giant reign that ate pf bottom brackets and was incredibly noisy. Creaking from the BB, fox 36 CSU, etc. I gave up on it eventually after I went through three bottom brackets in six months. It was a shame because I quite liked the bike otherwise.
Love always,
Lemon squeezy
Truthfully, there are much better bikes at the price, like the GG Shred Dogg and Mega Trail.
Support the little guy!
I am happy with my pressfit bottom bracket, now that it has a Wheels Manufacturing adapter in it
As an avid cyclist and former 2015 Giant Trance owner, I might suggest a shock and fork service and all new bearings/ bushings. You'd be surprised at how blown out the bearings get... You only know what you know until you know something new.
Happy trails
It was good again with a whole new set of bearings.
Seriously though that’s great that giant offers top level components on less expensive frames.
and with Pinkbike three days behind on publishing the First ride article, I think we can make some strong inferences.
Most new bikes in this travel travel range and most with 10 to 30mm more travel than this bike have shorter seat tubes.
When I grab my old steed, a classic 26, one of the last 26, wity more "modern", it's amazing the agility and "flicability" of such machine.
Sure it has all other drawback, but sure I miss that feeling:
I'm fast AF! (Although chrono/Strava proves the contrary!)
That's why I'm currently into a dilemma: building a modern 29er (Transition Smuggler) to replace my old-but-not-ridiculous RM Slayer SXC that I've got for 11 years. I decided to find him a successor last summer when I was having troubles in very steep terrains and on twisty bike parks: 68° HA on a gravity bike is definitely not the right number. Also the STA is much too slack and this bike doesn't climb well. It's a pity 'cos I love the LC2R rear suspension, I'm OK with the wheels' size, and it still looks cool
Here in France the phenoma exists as well, probably not so much, but bad climbers remain bad climbers, even on a carbon rig, and they don't go faster in the descents
On the plus side you can tell it's a Giant.
This design is outdated... especially when compared against the competition.
A small size of this bike might have been the next bike for my 11 year old son, but those seat tube lengths and stand-over heights take it out of the running for us. I wouldn't buy one for myself either... after experiencing a 210mm dropper, I don't think I could go back!
I know they are probably able to keep the prices down by not changing the frame design much, which is great, and I think they want to keep the bend as a brand identifier, but it's 2021 and geo has moved on... they're going to have to change things up if they want to be remain competitive. Though again, in this climate, they probably don't need to and will sell out anyway. So it's just too bad, as it's a great bike and spec...
We call it progression.
Just because your favourite racer who is employed by a company that produces Mullet fad bikes does not mean they actually believe they are better.
Look at the bigger picture and stop believing everything you are told.
But, out of curiosity, why does it bother you that others choose wheel combinations which are different from what you choose?
I want to like it but I don’t know what it is
I'm probably going to recommend something 29er though. The rocks on our local trails certainly favour bigger wheels. But 27.5 really favours the tight trials around here that were cut in on 26 bikes!
Maybe so but that is top value in a world where all suspension patents are expired
472mm reach - Great!
465mm seat tube. WTF??
I get that everyone has their preference, and for people who like long bikes that's short but then wouldn't it mess up weight distribution?
Longer reach puts the front wheel further, and it's already a 64°HA
Hmm is my 2020 Reign now outdated??
This website provide plentiful real riding comments of Trance X 27.5 via VITAL MTB, let's check it out
But yeah I'm just gonna call them "mixed wheel" bikes.
www.instagram.com/p/CUr7csrtMwm
www.pinkbike.com/photo/20063050
www.pinkbike.com/photo/21580653
But, if they are trying to sell a product that is both in stock and a reasonable price, I will support them 100%.
But an example would be compared with Norco optic or transition sentinel.