Greg Minnaar Shares his Training Difficulties Following a COVID-19 Diagnosis
Greg Minnaar has announced on social media that he caught COVID-19 while on a trip to Europe. Thankfully it was only a mild dose of the disease and he recovered "pretty quickly" but the aftermath of the disease is still disrupting his training.
The South African racer came into the offseason on the back of taking his record-extending 22nd World Cup win and finishing 3rd in the World Cup overall. Unfortunately, it sounds like the lingering effects of the disease will affect his preparation to build on that for the year ahead. He said, "I'm now two weeks post-COVID and I thought I'd be back training which isn't the case". He is currently working on keeping his heart rate down and letting his body fully recover for the next two weeks so he can resume normal training as soon as possible.
 | Well, we had a good trip to Europe a couple weeks back and I came back to South Africa to continue training and unfortunately came down with COVID. I must be honest I was really fortunate to have a mild dose and recovered pretty quickly. I'm now two weeks post-COVID and I thought I'd be back training which isn't the case. So, I've been chained to my doctors and my trainer Stefan out of Norway to come up with a solution over the next couple of weeks to return to full training. And it's not quite what I'm used to so I thought I'd share a bit over the next couple of weeks on what we're doing to try and keep the heart rate down and let the body fully recover before we return to full steam ahead training for this World Cup season. |
We wish Greg a speedy recovery and hope to see him back at full fitness soon.
Author Info:
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup
Will be getting the vaccine as soon as it is my turn.
New strains etc are a worry though.
Man, viruses are smart little monsters. Pretty lucky our bodies are such absurdly adaptive fortresses or they'd have wiped us out a long time ago. Microscopic organisms versus the human body on an epic scale.
Anybody besides me a fan of the Micronauts comic in the 80's wanna nerd out here?
Ps getwellsoongreg
Sure, a lot of people will take a couple of months to get back to normal, but that also isn’t long covid.
I have a doctor at the Mayo Clinic who manages my pots and the root cause of it for me (nerve damage, but aggravated by covid).
POTS never goes away for some people, and typically last for up to 5 years in a most.
Hopefully the goat is just dealing with some minor issues and hasn’t developed POTS
Stimulus is the name of the podcast. Starts around 13:00
www.stimuluspodcast.com/post/26-covid-19-vitamin-d-aspirin-restaurants-and-exercise-with-infection
Opinion, not hard science. I haven't seen any trials on this, although they may exist.
www.washingtonpost.com/health/long-haul-covid-vaccine/2021/03/16/6effcb28-859e-11eb-82bc-e58213caa38e_story.html
I also wonder if hyperbaric oxgygen therapy might help.
I've had good overall results with this stretching technique: www.thegeniusofflexibility.com
I pretty much ignore the new age stuff/Chinese Medicine 'meridian portion',
but might be worth a shot to work that lung meridian, and see what happens.
As you said, I haven't seen official courses of action for remediating lingering symptoms,
and don't think I've had COVID yet
(I was sick in January...after a coworkers New Years trip to Thailand...where she got deathly ill...#patientzero)
so am just spitballin here.
Good luck!
Huh, I never collected or really saw those toys. I do remember the 80's band Mortal Micronotz out of Kansas, whose record I passed by on the rack many many times and never bought or listened to. On a YT journey now....
It was well written for the period. Shouldn't have really been tied to the toy series, but...money.
marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Micronauts_Vol_1_1
Where have the ‘variants’ come from?
Do you think if everyone is turned into a asymptomatic carrier by the vaccine and other pressures (NPI’s) it won’t mutate into a more virulent strain?
When the vaccines become ineffective and younger people who had a good natural immune response to SARS- COV-2 start getting very sick, how quick can you produce another vaccine? Considering the virus can produce a new strain in about 12 hours.
riddle me this brianiac: if the virus is still spreading "asymptomatically" to "everyone" what advantage is the virus gaining by mutating to a variant that produces more disease.
Ahh because people aren’t virally loaded enough. A longer more symptomatic period equals more spread. However, if that happens naturally through a population we get heard natural immunity and a low mutation rate. Mass vaccinate and NPI’s etc and the virus will select for the most virulent mutation.
Check out ‘viral immune escape’.
You've basically rationalized away the entirety of immunology in your gibberish. There is a body of evidence that supports immunology that is undeniably massive and beyond well established.
This is anti-vax hokum.
Along with the other fun little coincidence, that being the virus having originated naturally from the same region as a level 4 bio laboratory
I think a vaccination of the elderly, the obese and/or those with hypertension would have been effective enough. The vast majority of younger people have enough adaptive immunity to cope with the virus without risking the possible autoimmune risk from mRNA vaccines. It would likely have had the welcome byproduct of reducing depression, suicides and allowing screening and preventative surgery’s to continue. I’m sure you’re aware that the aforementioned may end up causing more deaths over the longer term than the virus itself.
vhig.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Artikel_Schrikbeeld-van-immuunontsnapping.pdf
I was reading that 80% of humans with autoimmune diseases are women. I had no idea. An article written by a female autoimmune researcher also had this to say:
The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines (and others in the pipeline) have thus far been remarkably safe and effective. Based on experience with Covid and with other vaccines, it seems far better for people with autoimmune diseases to take these vaccines, than to risk Covid.
Seems a bit presumptuous don’t you think?
But did you know that PB considers *you* a Variant of Concern? I've seen the list!
I'm on there too, but trying to keep it cool.
600mg Magnesium (critical for activating Vit-D to both prohormone and active hormone, D does not work well without it)
1 gram Vitamin-C 2x a day (important for immune system white blood cell production and mobilization)
Pretty much most of the population is deficient in one or all of these, especially Vit-D, the most important. Above will go very very long way in both preventing you from catching the virus and getting severely ill, "long covid" or death.
The fact that is immune escape?
Viruses also can get weaker or stronger in mutation. There is nothing that says that a virus will weaken. I mean, COVID is literally a mutation of another virus... sooo.....
My Cliff Notes version is terrible. It was a long, fairly logical explanation about how we're max vaccinating the weakest strains in at risk groups and younger bodies are the ones strains will be forced to latch onto as powerfully as possible?
Wish i could translate what I heard. It made a lot of sense.
edit: found it. youtu.be/YtHfI00D_s4
I don't pretend to be an expert. I like logic. I try to have an open mind and listen to different theories to get as much info as I can. Lots of what if's and most of what was important was the first 25 minutes. What he says wouldn't surprise me at all.
I'm just gonna eat healthy, not cough on people and get on with my life and see which version I eventually come down with. Or...which version(s) I've had but didn't know I had?
Love thy neighbor.
Man, if we only had scientists who didn't have mega-profits on the line every time a need for help pops up. So I completely understand what you're saying. I take them all with a grain of salt for sure.
I think my main "conspiracy theory" is the warning from Michael Olsterholm in his book 4 years ago that something like this was coming. Some of the justification for him saying it is always "Well, we as virologists, etc can see the progressions viruses make over time and see this as a natural progression or evolution of a strain of viruses". But then the paranoid/borderline logical flip of the coin says "Olsterholm knew that was coming because people in his field knew about the Faucci viral strains shipped to China were bound to get loose eventually" aluminum foil conspiracy theory.
It all makes your brain wanna pop
@jclnv is exactly right with his statements.
The phenomenon he is referring to is known as "leaky vaccine" and the existence of this very problem is 100% scientifically established -- the most prominent example being "Marek's Disease", a virus common in chicken and wild birds.
In case of Marek's disease, the virulence of the virus increased up that point, that it was 100% deadly for any non-vaccinated birds or chickens ONLY due to the fact, that the vaccine caused infections to take place asymptomatically. In nature, higher virulent strains would die with their host while less virulent strains would keep spreading until mass immunization sets in over time. This leads to an evolutionary selection of less virulent virus strains over time as a rule of nature. A leaky vaccine, however, does the exact opposite -- it inverts the natural selection, because now even the deadliest strains can spread without their hosts dying.
@CarlMega "Who else in the established medical community holds this position?"
Great question, because this is exactly where the real problem is. Their job is to be critical and address this, but they aren't. Why? Because if they were, they'd lose their job in an instant since such a statement is politically incorrect. Covid has become more of political problem than an actual medical problem.
Make of it what you will. This was my first and last comment regarding this topic.
@cuban-b even a blind hen sometimes finds a grain of corn
Apparently you have a thing for pointing your finger at people, don't you? Well, according to your bio you're 9 years old... seems like a pretty accurate estimate of your mental age (:
I’m actually consider getting myself an ebike so I can do a little more intense climbing. My cardio came back after a few months, but symptoms come and go (sometimes with more intensity than before)
www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2667(21)00036-0/fulltext?fbclid=IwAR0Opc5tFFQhg9Ty5yTzptphNde_OwmzIWtivBvTsZVd6ruh1BAwkRCla6Q21
Here we have one of the worlds most respected medical journals agreeing with my comments. Will you please integrate this new information as it appears you’re “stunningly ill informed”. Maybe contact all the people who downvoted me to correct them also as it appears they were influenced by your lack of understanding of the facts.
Thanks.
And just an aside, the Lancet isn't immune from publishing bunk and then having to retract it:
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jun/05/lancet-had-to-do-one-of-the-biggest-retractions-in-modern-history-how-could-this-happen
Carry on, my good crank.
Thanks
Yeah I think I’ll take the word of the five scientists involved in the paper over some Pinkbike hack. Sorry chump.
And I quote;
“Brazil suggests a so-called natural immune evasion.2 Also, the dynamics of natural or vaccinal collective immunity in the regions where these variants emerged might have placed substantial pressure on the viral ecosystem, facilitating the emergence of a variant with enhanced transmissibility.
If substantial immune evasion occurs, current vaccines are likely to still offer some benefit to individuals. At the population level, however, they could induce viral selection and escape, making the prospect of achieving herd immunity increasingly remote.”
I rest my case.
Also, you are the Pinkbike hack.
At this stage you would have to be a total moron to believe that all the interventions from NPI’s to vaccines have achieved anything and overall will likely have led to more deaths than doing absolutely nothing. From the beginning the institutional junk science, based on crap modelling and high cycle PCR false positive testing, have convinced the masses that the government is saving them from viral armageddon. That’s the real eyeopener about this whole thing. How incapable of critical thinking the dumb masses have become. Thinking the media propaganda is factual, believing that governments act in their best interests and are somehow immune from being lobbied by pharmaceutical multinationals. A planet of naive drones. Sad.
READ.
“Brazil suggests a so-called natural immune evasion.2 Also, the dynamics of natural or vaccinal collective immunity in the regions where these variants emerged might have placed substantial pressure on the viral ecosystem, facilitating the emergence of a variant with enhanced transmissibility.”
But somehow, thinking outside of the herd mentality of only one type of scientific reasoning makes you a nutjob?
Maybe the creators of these vaccines are 100% right and stand the best chance of slowing this virus and those who believe in their effort will be better for it.
But then to belittle those who propose the possibility that circumventing the human immune response and inducing a mass reaction to a single strain via worldwide vaccination might cause unwanted aggressive mutations?
It's not logical to dismiss the latter as possible. Years from now, we still won't have the correct answer. We could all come back to this thread, look at what unfolded and still not have a perfect answer to what is unfolding.
We can't even cure cancers which have been around for far longer than this one virus.
But...oh, we give people these 3 specific emergency approved vaccinations from these 3 companies to the entire populace & Covid-19 is dead and we'll never see it again. Pretending to know it all on the net.
First paragraph: Um...what?
Second: code for "alternative science". What is alternative science? Not science, that's what.
Third: Yep, they are right. Millions upon millions of examples already.
Fourth: Rampant anti-science kooks get ridicule. Plain and simple.
Fifth: Blubbldy blah blah to setup a never ending "you never know" vortex.
Sixth: cancer is a condition, made up of various diseases. Many cancers are in fact curable. Cancer survival rates as a whole have increased dramatically. And "cancer" has nothing to do with COVID. So what were you saying again?
Seventh: Nope, nobody ever said that. In fact, these companies, scientists, governments, have all openly said that yearly boosters will likely be necessary and even bundled into your yearly flu shot. How do you miss simple facts like this? Or do you do it intentionally in order to maintain your nutty and dangerous internal narrative?
You’re just sucking up the politicised, pharmaceutical lobbied narrative fed to you by the media.
As they say, when they can’t win the debate, they attack the debater.
Science has processes yes, but it's not perfect. You can replicate a study all you want but no guarantees that you get the same result each time. I don't prescribe any one answer because I understand that we're on a giant globe with unlimited variables.
Are people doing the best they can with the information given so far? Sure. Are people going to extremes on this? Heck yes. On every side of the debate.
Are we a giant seething mass of overpopulated mouth breathers? Yep. Vaccines are a "buckshot" approach simply because this virus was on every single continent in less than 30 days.
Yes, they may put a dent in this chaos. But to dismiss the idea that mass vaccination across the globe could backfire? That's naive at best.
I accept all possibilities because we are a global, mobilized populace that can go from Nebraska to the Ukraine in under 48 hours.
What we have here - is an outlier. Someone making a claim. A claim that not only contradicts the body of evidence collected thus far - but also one that has no study, no evidence of their own - there is no covid study backing this claim. It also has glaring errors, omissions and by all accounts deceptive. Tailor made to appeal to anti-vax skeptics - likely in appeal to boost someone's own notoriety. Further, this person is making claims on topics outside their field, someone who hasn't published a study in 30 years. This is like me laying claim to beating Bruni - preposterous but ok...suit up buddy, meet you at the track...NO? oh that's what I thought. Bullsh1t.
"Mar 15, 2021 at 20:40
cuban-b says:
Happy to continue this ruse we have going on. Pb mods have no idea that you ok anned this all along just to stir the pot and increase clicks. They should be thanking you at this this point. Your entire idea of causing havoc and chaos on the boards is working! Let’s keep this up bro Smile
Mar 15, 2021 at 20:45
cuban-b says:
We are homeboys broham! #Maga!!"
Mar 15, 2021 at 21:11
cuban-b-can-blow-me says:
Go away stalker.
Mar 15, 2021 at 21:12
cuban-b says:
Smile . Haha "
www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.06.21254882v1?fbclid=IwAR0KWjKALBMSix_ZQUJ0MQ5qlr1X4K881wtDrfgHEYr68lvDs06nyaCU52E
Rob, tell the story about when you noticed you were going bald again!
Be careful people, even if you are being ill with it, it ruins everything after and that actually hurts me more than while I was ill.
You also would have received downvotes because we want you to be wrong. We want the vaccine to be our return to normal. Even if some of what you say turns out to be right - we won't like that.
On the other hand, your comment on boosting immune systems is partly true. Not everyone needs supplements - they are literally extra things that you can take if your nutrition and lifestyle isn't meeting your body's needs. Generally speaking the best way to boost your immune system is eat healthy, drink water, stay active and get good rest.
If enough of us take the vaccine quickly enough it really will go away. Don't hear much about smallpox or polio outbreaks these days now do you?
abcnews.go.com/Health/pfizer-vaccine-shows-94-effectiveness-asymptomatic-transmission-covid/story?id=76389615
I honestly wouldn't have cared about your comment until you started accusing others of being a conspiracy hub.
It is unlikely that the virus will rapidly evolve such that the existing vaccines becoming completely ineffective and the whole world will need to lock itself down again. The virus will mutate, but the vaccines will be updated to match. So you'll need another jab in a year or so, just like we do with the flu already. I think most of us understand that a yearly Covid jab is going to be a reality for a long time to come.
As to your other points about travel and stuff, that's not really on my personal radar right now. But I can't fault a country for imposing a vaccine requirement on entrants if they choose. It's their country. And if a prospective visitor doesn't like it, they can spin the globe and pick another. On the other hand, reducing or removing quarantine for those who have their shots is gaining scientific validity. See the recent Israeli studies. While not 100%, it's becoming clear that the vaccine is in the 90% range of actually preventing infection. Measles vaccine is virtually 100%, but it's turning out the MNRA vaccines are pretty darn close. For those not following, there are vaccines that actually prevent you getting infected, like measles, and vaccines that bolster your immune system so when you are infected you fight it off much more easily (like the flu vaccine). First kind, you never get it so you can never spread it. Second kind, you can still get it and spread it. MNRA Covid vaccines seem now to be mostly the first kind, which is pretty f*cking amazing. Science FOR THE WIN!
You seem to have a good understanding of your own health, virus transmission, and are willing to take other actions to prevent yourself from becoming a virus spreader. Unfortunately, I do not think that describes the majority of those who refuse vaccines. Not in the USA anyways.
"something around 70-80% of the deaths from covid in America are people who are obese."
Now, are you sure about that? Maybe want to take another look before giving your final answer?
Also, please explain to me why you need ME to take the vaccine in order to protect YOU, if you yourself already are protected by the vaccine (that you chose to get)? It makes no sense.
www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7010e4.htm For someone trying to discredit a person and there information you sure don't know how to Google something. All this information is found damn near effortlessly if you actually look. There's so much information on this topic it's comical that you're even attempting to dismiss it.
Regarding your second sentence: a vaccine that only stops symptoms but not actual infections, which - according to the WHO - might very well be the case for covid vaccines, does not help in that respect. On the contrary, it makes the problem even worse. And let me remind you, that this question is not yet scientifically determined. Thus, at this point in time with only very limited knowledge about the potential consequences, a mass vaccination actually poses an inherent risk of making matters worse.
Now to my favorite shill argument: "unnecessary burden the healthcare system"?
What about the burden of potential side effects from experimental vaccines? You do realize that governments all over the world had to sign exclusion of liability waivers to pharma companies in case of potential health problems, meaning that tax-payers have to fully carry the financial burden, don't you? So as long as no medium or long turn effects of an experimental mass vaccination are established, this argument is pure hypocrisy. The fact that the Astra-Zeneca vaccine has been paused or banned in multiple countries by now, shows that concerns about side-effects are very tangible and cannot be dismissed as conspiracies.
Now, I could go on and ridicule your financial burden argument even more by saying that - according to your logic - smoking (or mountain-biking for that matter) should be illegal, too, as they pose an unnecessary financial burden on the healthcare system. Clearly, you as a mountain biker are more prone to injuries than the avg. populace, aren't you?
It must be noted that you appear to trust governments when they pause the vaccine. But not when they approve it.
I will acknowledge your point that the existing COVID vaccines have not yet been proven to reduce transmission. My interpretation here is that it is much more difficult to prove reduction in transmission versus improved health outcome. But eradication of smallpox and polio, and near eradication of measles, suggests that vaccines generally reduce viruses ability to reproduce themselves.
Is anyone forcing you to take the vaccine? I don’t think they are. And if 400 million doses administered world wide with publicly disclosed side effects doesn’t convince you of vaccine safety it’s doubtful that anything will.
Average life expectancy in developed countries is about 83 years, so 83 - 25 (conservative estimate) gives about 58 years multiplied by $69,000 (again ignoring the significantly higher first year costs). This aggregates to about 4 million dollars of financial burden in case of a serious spinal injury - only to satisfy your personal desire for adrenaline rush. Therefore, I conclude that Freeride and Downhill mountain biking should be legally prohibited. Change my mind.
(Disclaimer: obviously, this doesn't depict my opinion but I'm taking this position purely for arguments' sake).
Your assumption regarding my inconsistency towards trusting the government is false and it also does not apply to my stance at all. Approving vaccines and making them obligatory for everyone (i.e. denying me the right to refuse it or discriminating against me by excluding me from social or recreational activities, or, restricting my personal freedoms and mobility) is two entirely different pair of shoes.
You acknowledging my point regarding the safety and efficacy of existing COVID vaccines should be enough to agree that _mandatory_ vaccines cannot be justified at all - and this was precisely what this argument was about, because my question was why YOU need ME to take the vaccine in order to protect YOU.
Also, regarding your personal interpretation of risks and benefits, I'd kindly ask you to find my comment addressing the well established medical problem known as "leaky vaccine" in one of my comments above (check below threshold if you can't find it).
Comparing the eradication of measles and other diseases with quickly mutating viruses like Influenza or Corona is entirely missing the point. While a measles vaccine protects you for an entire lifetime, constantly changing viruses like Corona or Influenza will require new vaccinations on a regular basis and probably have only limited efficacy, hence the "yearly" flu-shot. Just think about it: 7 billion people requiring a yearly jab sounds an awful lot like a tax-paid ATM machine for Big Pharma.
Anyway, I appreciate you engaging a constructive debate! Unfortunately, this seems to be exception nowadays.
www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/more/fully-vaccinated-people.html. See key point #3. Definitely points to YOU taking the vaccine helping to protect ME as well. I do not expect you to trust our American CDC. But that is why my position is firm. I would be glad to read any information you can provide from an equivalently-staffed organization (eg, full of credentialed scientists). Or you can share your own credentials. I'm just a snow-bound mountain biker.
You don't need to answer publicly but here's a though experiment: under what circumstances would you accept a vaccine?
I could probably destroy you quite effortlessly in any serious debate even in my second language.
We've been doing this for a year. Anyone who doesn't understand the gravity of the situation yet won't understand it ever.
Best wishes to Greg; it'll take a lot more than covid to keep that guy down.
Check this out: www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death
At 2.7 million deaths worldwide in the last year, by the 2019 numbers Covid-19 would be the 4th or 5th leading cause of death worldwide. No arguments, just some real deal facts. And that, my friend, is why you can f*ck off.
Obvious evidence of incapacity of the human society.
3 simple and objective observations in this thread:
1) having a well-founded opinion opposing the mainstream is not tolerated.
2) mainstream supporters clearly are the aggressors in the comment section.
3) mainstream supporters consider themselves better informed and superior in their cognitive ability while actually being unable to engage in any substantial debate.
Conclusion: propaganda works well and NPCs act exactly as intended.
You literally insinuate that people are dying because of folks who "refuse to take care or take action" (referring to us?). You're basically saying nothing of substance there, except that it is our fault... but not how or why? Please elaborate what exactly the point is that you're trying to make.
If you're referring to the lack of willingness to take an experimental vaccine, then I have to decidedly dismiss your argument -- because taking it poses an inherent health risk, so it should be up to the individual to decide whether or not to take it, wouldn't you agree? The Astra Zeneca vaccine would not have been banned in several countries if there wasn't a potential health risk.
Also, if there is 1% of the entire global population that has increased risk of dying compared to the other 99%, then it is only logical, that this tiny minority has to limit its exposure to those risks -- not the other 99%, however. Because risking to destroy the entire world economy, hundreds of millions of jobs, food security, energy supply and the financial existence of the broad human population doesn't seem like anything worth trading in to protect that 1% whose life expectancy is very limited anyway, does it? A society needs solidarity, but solidarity has its limits. The limit is where the marginal cost is outweighing the marginal benefit, and this certainly is the case here. So much to common sense.
Now let's interpret the data:
You're postulating that COVID deaths pose a "significantly large and preventable component" of deaths.
Firstly, the US has an infection-death-rate of 0.16% (total deaths / total cases). Sweden, which had exactly ZERO mask-mandates nor any sort of lockdown, features a infection-death-rate of 0.13%. Switzerland, masks only in shops and lockdown only for 2-3 weeks total, features a infection-death-rate of 0.11%.
The same applies to the total number of deaths per 100,000 inhabitants, which is 162 for the US, 131 for Sweden, 109 for Switzerland... and only 23 for Belarus (infection-death-rate 0.023%). Belarus, again a country giving zero f*cks about masks or lockdowns whatsoever.
I guess we can agree that these numbers are NEITHER "significantly large" NOR does the data show that it was in any way easily "preventable" by any sort of lockdown measures.
Hence, your remarks are literally nothing but a meaningless cluster of words.
I do appreciate the comment section here on pb but mostly because of all the bike knowledge that is on here. I love that I can ask a question about bikes and someone on here will have the answer. There’s people that are way more into bikes than me and I think that’s awesome.
What really bums me out though in the bike community is how so many people would up vote the comments that you wrote me and at the same time down vote mine to the threshold. It’s too bad that all those people will probably not see the second half of our conversation, but we are definitely living in some crazy times right now and I can’t blame people for getting passionate about something that they care about. The knowledge and entertainment in the comments here still out weighs the bad stuff, for me at least. So I’ll continue to spread the love, knowledge, and entertainment throughout our awesome worldwide biker community. I hope that you’ll be able to do the same as well.
Have an awesome day. Peace!!!
Anyway, thanks again brother, and ride on!!!
Anyway, hope the GOAT doesn't have any long term issues. Can't wait till everyone gets the full vax treatment and we start getting back to normal.
The U.S. has some excellent private schools though.
@flaflow: anytime, American brothers and sisters.
So did his pall bearers
ALC-0315 = (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate)
ALC-0159 = 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide
1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
cholesterol
potassium chloride
potassium dihydrogen phosphate
sodium chloride
disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate
sucrose
Please can you tell me what is dangerous and why? I'd be grateful to know because I'm due to go back for a second jab soon.
But then again, i understand that for you it is easier to call people woketards on the internet than going to university. Smolbrain gotta stay dumb eh ?
Anhydrous ammonia
Ephedrine
Toluene
Pseudoephedrine
Hydrochloric acid (HCL)
Lithium
Lye (sodium hydroxide)
Phosphorus
Acetone
I feel great
Both times the symptoms were exactly like covid, the first time was the worst case I've had in my 40yrs.
A crazy fact that more people need to know is the CDC does "not" record deaths from the flu or flu related complications like they do with covid. They merely come up with an estimate from positive lab results, not actual deaths. This is just an observation of facts, not
confirmation of some kind of conspiracy. Covid is definitely real, but we should also be asking why we don't count actual flu deaths considering it effects a larger part of the population. The flu has been killing people for decade's but we don't record the real numbers? Seems legit to me..lol
www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/weeklyarchives2020-2021/WhoNPHL45.html
LOL
www.winknews.com/2020/09/23/cdc-shows-covid-19-has-high-survival-rate-doctor-still-wants-to-see-precautions-taken
This article is literally about an athlete (the goat) describing the lingering effects of covid on his physical health and his (in)ability to train for his profession.