Have you ever wondered how pumping works? Why pushing downwards into the ground helps to propel you forward? I did, but for a long time I was satisfied with a very common explanation that went something like this: when you're pushing into the down-slope of a roller, you're making your bike heavier, and when you let the bike come towards you as you go up the next roller, the bike is lighter. That's what propels you forward - it's almost like you're turning gravity up and down to your advantage.
But a couple of things made me realize this explanation was wrong. And this misunderstanding was causing my pumping technique to suffer.
The first was the realization that you could pump around corners. Not just to generate traction or to do a sweet cuttie; pushing into a berm can actually generate speed. In fact, it's possible to pump while snaking side to side on flat ground, as demonstrated in
this Skills With Phil video, which is great fun by the way. But a turn isn't downhill or uphill. So how does that work?
The second revelation came when a coach told me I was pumping too early. Instead of pushing into the steepest part of the down-slope, he got me to wait a fraction longer and push into the curved transition at the end of the slope. The difference was palpable.
When I thought about it more, pushing into the down-slope can't be what's pushing you forward. Imagine you're going down a hill with a constant gradient. Gravity accelerates you down the slope because the vertical force of gravity is not at right angles to the slope. But, if you extend your legs and push into the ground, you're pushing at right angles to the ground underneath your wheels, which doesn't help propel you forward at all. A lot of pumping explanations talk about pushing vertically downward onto a down-slope, but because the only thing to push against is the floor, the reaction force you're generating is always at right angles to the ground, and to direction you want to accelerate.
Physics 101So how is it that pumping helps to generate speed in a corner or through a set of rollers? It's all to do with conservation of angular momentum.
This is a classic physics demonstration where someone spins around with heavy weights in both hands. Then, as he pulls the weights in towards the center of rotation, he spins faster. On first glance, it might look like the weights only rotate faster because they're describing a smaller circle, but the weights are actually speeding up.
The same is true of a
pirouetting ice-skater, a spiral coin machine, the orbits of the planets, or the water draining from your bathtub: as the radius decreases, the speed increases. This is explained very neatly by the law of conservation of angular momentum. For a mass that is moving around a circle or a corner with a constant radius, the angular momentum is given by its mass, times the radius of the turn, times its velocity. (Angular momentum=MVR). In the absence of friction or other external forces, this quantity always stays the same.
So if the radius of curvature decreases (like the weights getting closer to the axis of rotation) then in order to conserve angular momentum, the velocity has to increase. In fact, if you halve the radius of the circle, the velocity must double. Let's apply this to pumping.
Imagine you're in a berm or a trough which has a radius of five meters. It has a center of curvature, the point that's always five meters away from any point on the curve. If you extend your arms and legs to push away from the ground, your center of mass will move towards the center of rotation. So as far as your body weight is concerned, the radius of curvature has decreased, and by conservation of angular momentum, your speed will increase. So when you're pumping through a set of rollers, it's the radius of curvature of the rollers that's important, not the down slope or the up slope. Picture the concave, U-shaped part of the rollers - the trough between the peaks. That is when you want to extend your arms and legs because you can move your center of mass towards the center of curvature about which the ground is curving. Similarly, when you're going over the crest of the rollers, you want to contract your arms and legs such that you move towards the center of curvature, which is now somewhere beneath the ground.
This is why I used to suck at pumping. You don't want to extend your arms and legs when you're on the steepest part of the down slope, but the most tightly curved part of the transition. Sometimes the difference in timing can be quite subtle, but if you have a long down-slope before the transition, it pays to be patient and push only once the ground starts to curve. Similarly, it's the crest of the roller where you want the bike to come up towards you, not the steepest part of the up-slope.
A more thorough explanationBut the law of conservation of angular momentum is not really an explanation: a law is just a relationship between some variables, not a cause. So if you want a better explanation of
why angular momentum is conserved, check out this video from Vsauce.
To summarize, if you have a mass going around a circle with one radius, and then you pull that mass in towards a narrower radius, (like the rider pumping into a berm, or an ice skater pulling her arms in), it doesn't go instantly from one radius to a narrower radius, it moves in a spiral pattern. And when that happens, the path it follows is no longer perpendicular to the line drawn from the mass to the center of rotation. That means if you pull towards the center of rotation, you're no longer pulling that mass perpendicular to its direction; you're pulling it slightly ahead, and that is what causes the mass to speed up. It's being pulled slightly forwards as well as radially inwards. This explains why a mass will speed up when it's drawn towards the center of curvature.
On a bike, as you push away from a berm, your center of mass moves in a spiral instead of an arc with a constant radius. And when you do that, you're pushing not only towards the center of the turn; you're also pushing your mass slightly forwards.
The transition giveth and the transition taketh awayIt's worth remembering that the opposite is also true. If you allow your center of mass to move towards the ground in a compression, you will
lose speed, just as an ice skater who extends her arms and legs away from the axis of rotation will slow down. Centrifugal force will naturally cause your arms and legs to collapse slightly unless you make a conscious effort, and your suspension will compress too, pulling you further from the center of curvature. So if you're on a full suspension bike you have to work even harder to counter this and to maintain speed. But remember that even if you only maintain your speed by pumping through a turn or compression, that's a win compared to the speed you would lose if you rode passively.
Also, pumping is not "free speed". The work you do pushing yourself away from the ground against the centrifugal force is what provides the energy that accelerates you down the trail. Anyone who's ridden a few laps of a pump track knows this energy is not "free".
Of course this doesn't just apply to a pump track. I find pumping most fun when finding natural corners and compressions to gain speed from. Just remember to look for the curves not the slopes.
"Hey, wait, I didn't write that!"
Excellent illustrations from Taj, as usual, by the way! The physics of pumping is not well understood by the MTB community and it's truly refreshing to hear someone who understands that it's not about "being light on upsides and heavy on downsides". It's not about kinetic and potential energy transfer, and nor is pumping "free speed" by any means! It's also not exactly about conservation of angular momentum in the MTB case. This is different form the "ice skater" analogy because the ice skater does not add energy externally to the entire system. They don't do any "positive work" on the whole system. But in the case of pumping a roller or berm, the rider certainly does! By pressing hard into the ground in the right way, the rider is actually adding energy to the system, IE doing positive work on the whole system by pushing against the ground. That's how the rider's speed (linear, not angular) can progressively increase. Taj also makes the very keen observation that the rider can do the converse, ie extracting energy from the system (and slow their speed) if they "allow the trail to pump them".
Taj, you've made a similar revelation that I did many years ago about pumping. However for me, it was an excellent video from Lee McCormack (from Lee Likes Bikes) at the time, where he uses a BMX to show that you can pump perfectly flat ground to increase your speed. That was a real eye-opener for me and like you, I realized I was pumping all wrong! Lee's video helped me to understand that pumping is not exactly about getting heavy and light and not about upsides and downsides. Heck, you don't even technically need gravity either to do it!
The best explanation I can make for how to pump is this: Pumping to generate speed simply requires the rider to make a "positive displacement under load" of his/her center of mass toward the center of curvature while going through this curved path.
Remembering back to high school physics, the rider is basically using their legs and arms to push and do "positive work" on the bike-rider system and the result is an increase in the kinetic energy (speed) of the system. So if you want to increase speed while turning left on flat ground, start in a low crouch, lean, and while arcing left and the load on your arms/legs increases due to the curved path, you progressively move your body left (further from your wheels) while you are arcing left. That's it. You've done positive work and you'll increase your speed. For the case of rollers in a straight line, you start in a crouch as you enter the valley between rollers. As soon as you start entering the "concave up" portion of a valley, your arms and legs start taking more load due to the curved path taken (centripetal force as Taj notes it). You progressively push against this new force you are feeling and effectively move your body mass toward the center of the curved path taken, which is further from the track surface basically) and finish your elevation when the valley is not concave up anymore. So it really has nothing to do with the front side and back side of rollers and doesn't actually have anything to do with gravity either.
Is pumping free speed? Definitely not as you well know if you've ridden pump tracks! When you take an arced path under load at speed, say in a valley or in a berm, your body weight basically becomes "magnified" in proportion to the speed you are going, and how tight that arc is. And you need to use your body to fight this load and also make a positive displacement against it. As you go faster and faster, the load on your body through all these concave arcs becomes higher and higher. It's kind of like doing squats with weights, with a really sadistic personal trainer. They guy is yelling at you to do these squats faster and faster, but every time you speed up your squat, he goes and adds more weight on your shoulders! On the pump track it's not enough to just resist this increasing load, but you actually must move your body weight against it, ever more quickly if you want to keep generating more speed. Free speed? No, far from it, especially as your speed increases!
The Zero-Gravity Intergalactic PumpTrack Thought-Experiment: When human beings have outgrown our planet, have no fear because pump tracks can still work without gravity. Imagine an all-steel pump track where the rider has magnets in their rims instead of rubber tires so you will stay in contact with the track at all times. You're going to need good clip pedals too here despite all your friends telling you flats are so much better for technical riding.
You get on your bike, give yourself a little push, clip in, and much to your amazement, you realize you can still pump this track to generate speed. Even without gravity, the technique still works the same way. You start in the valley in a crouch and elevate your body while the track is concave up, and voila, your speed goes up. Thankfully you bought some good clip pedals which keep your shoes stuck to the bike while going over the crests of those rollers. You think to yourself: Hey, when I go over a roller, I feel this new pulling force in my arms and my legs trying to separate me from the track since there is no gravity to keep me down anymore. You find this interesting and it makes you wonder if you can use that new force you feel to your advantage: If I am extended upward after finishing my "valley pump" and if I fight this new pulling force I'm feeling when I'm going over a roller (through the convex portion) and if I use my legs and arms to pull myself toward the track, will that also help me to generate more speed? To your amazement it does. In space on the mag-track, you learned that you can effectively "push-pump" the valleys but also "pull-pump" the crests of the rollers too. You can accelerate at an incredible rate, far beyond what you could do back on earth. You are pretty impressed with yourself and you realized you really have to develop those leg muscles for pulling up though.
Okay that was super long. Thanks to those who got to the end of that!
I would add an analogy to skating, but not to doing pirouettes, but just skating forwards. There too you are making a positive displacement under load, that is with exerting more than your body weight to do positive work. This is very close to the magnetic pumptrack thought experiment, but results in oscillating motion from side to side as well as pulsing acceleration forwards.
What is worth to note is the pitch of your skates or your transition. Exerting force to a plane at 30° to your desired speed vector as opposed to 45° is like pushing a harder gear. as at 45° 1" of vertical movement gives 1" of horisontal. But pumping the end of a transition or berm will have an angle less than that, and you will advance more in line with your desired speed vector than perpendicular to it.
The curvature provides you with centripetal force, to keep you "glued to the ground" while you pump. This increases your ability to push the ground for longer with more force -> doing more work. Now you just need to pump as late as possible as hard as possible. But not so late, that your final velocity vector is not parallel with the ground but upwards producing a "small hop".
@seb-stott I reckon you should update the article with @kpickrell 's comment.
@verskis Mietipäs kriittisemmin
Your comment is on point. I never really thought of it like that. I usually do pumping corners technique to warm up and it generates so much speed without rollers. Great comment.
@sokantoivo: Your analogy to ice skating to propel yourself forward is a really good one. Yes, it is just like the mag-track idea turned on its side. You also have observed that when accelerating forward while skating your skates are actually taking an arc, or at least they need to be in order to use the pumping effect to accelerate you. When you're on your right skate, the arc is concave left and you need to move your center of mass progressively "left" relative to the skate while going through this arc. Doing this, you're adding external energy to the system by pushing against the ice. These arcs when skating can be very subtle and I doubt that most skaters even realize it is there. In this case there is no spinning and no angular momentum involved really. It's pretty interesting to watch this effect in speed-skating. You can see the top racers conserving their energy and their legs by making small movements to pump and maintain speed until the last lap. There they top racers that have been able to save their legs, can often pull far away from the field through more pronounced pumping "sprint" at the end.
I've always viewed it like this: If you sit static on your bike, your Center of Gravity (CG) will go up and down with the rollers. Your speed will increase as you descend to the troughs and it will decrease as you ascend to the crests. If you work to keep your CG exactly level (moving your body up and down with respect to the bike), your ground speed will remain (roughly) constant.
To accelerate you must push down and raise your CG while going down the backside of the roller. You are accelerating the bike the downward and countering that acceleration with your mass/inertia, which is why the zero-gravity example from above would still work. You run out of leg length quickly doing this which is why manualing through taller rollers is helpful. Part of the chainstay length is added to your legs.
For a fun visualization for the mechanical nerds out there, look at a radial piston hydraulic motor. youtu.be/xUF64qmUKv4?t=36
Of course, this is all purely academic. What matters is that it is really fun when you get it right!
The other complication being ignored here, I think, is that we're riding on a two wheeled platform that has some physical length that is often comparable to the curvature of the surface it is on. We can apply torque to the platform and create lift on one wheel and added down force on the other. I think it's pretty common to see good riders almost lifting their front wheel off the ground as it starts to go up the face of a roller. That may correlate also with a raise in their COM (doing work against the load), but I think there is more to it than that.
I think it's possible to create a thought experiment where one can generate forward speed in a scenario like this, in the absence of both gravity... and any initial speed. If we go purely with the doing work against a load theory, then with no speed comes no centrifugal load, and therefore nothing to do work against. But imagine the magnetic pump track in space again, and have the rider with their front wheel on the up-face of a steep roller, and their rear wheel on the flat run in. I contend that the rider could push on the bars perpendicular to the face, and pull down with their legs perpendicular to the run-in (thereby loading their legs), and then when they spring up from their legs, and hold tight to the bar, the direction of that impulse can have a non-zero component in the direction parallel to the up-face and therefore generate "forward" movement for the rider. I think of this as a "conflicted-plane" situation, where one can push against one plane and generate movement parallel to the other (different) plane. Again, this comes into play when there is curvature, and likely gets confused in our minds with the simple up/down against the load approach. An easy way to visualize this is an astronaut in the corner of a room on the space station, in the absence of gravity, but within arm's reach of both walls that are right-angles to each other. We can all imagine how one could push off the wall of one's choosing to create movement parallel to the other wall.
It feels really good to get a proper explanation to it, my mind is blown now!
Also, when you're more compressed at the top and extended at the bottom, you're actually decreasing the change of potential energy because the difference in the height of your center of mass is less.
Growing up riding halfpipes definitely made pumping on an MTB a little more natural.
...
*Cries right after*
I find it a bit easier to learn to have a bit more speed (i.e. to get across 2-3 rollers without pumping) to get some early success and confidence, then maybe get slower to practice precision.
Here Pinkbike is like a friendlier more colorful and helpful version than the nerding–out flame wars/circlejerks in ze German Mtb–News.de comment board, where every minor academic error gets dissected to death and endlos discussions ensue.
Well done team
I fully anticipate every error to be "dissected to death", however...
You can use this method (among others) that, full-disclosure, I worked on with relatively little setup: "Angular momentum primitives for human turning: Control implications for biped robots"
It seems, especially with the advent of YouTube "coaches" and "how-to" videos, that we are awash in a sea of poor coaching with no foundation in any of the sciences, whether that's pedagogy, motor learning or physics. So we just get this constant re-hashing of coaching what they see (using internal focus cues of move arms/legs like this or "elbows out" etc...) or copying others poor coaching (get light/heavy to pump etc...)!
If a coach can blend some motor-learning theory with these simple physics cartoon lessons I think the standard of riding and coaching the world over would improve. Maybe there's a market for comic-book coach education?
Pushing down into the bike when it is sloping downhill or before the apex of a corner generates forces normal to surface (more traction when pumping a corner) as well as forces that are pointing in the direction we are traveling, giving the acceleration. The angular momentum explanation is way off base.
When you pump you ADD force with your muscles to accelerate your FORWARD motion.
Force vectors explain how you gain forward acceleration on a slope and more force equals more acceleration.
I’ve tried to teach my son and friends and I believe it purely comes from experience as well as technique.
Although my son would rebel to me if I said the sky was blue. ????
What about gravity? You can always push against that, even on a consistent (not curved) downslope. In fact pushing against gravity (or inertia, for pumping a berm or flat ground) is what makes a pump work: because the slope\berm\ground isn't perpendicular to the momentum, any force against the momentum\gravity will have a force vector mirrored across the normal of the slope (a line perpendicular to the tangent at any given point), so some of pushing "down" force becomes pushing forward, but this doesn't need to happen on a curved surface. The curve just helps stretch the pump forces because the vector pushing back directly against you pushing against gravity\intertia slowly increases, giving some feedback to help indicate you can keep pushing. On a linear sloped landing you have to push more evenly and "slowly" (don't blow the pump all at once), but you can still pump without a curve.
I think the reason you needed to pump later is that you run out of pump before the bottom, not because pumping the curved part of the transition is inherently better.
are those Mario Kart speed boost chevrons or Excitebike speed boost chevrons?
Obvs gonna be sciencing the shit out of those rollers on the Verderers descent soon to prove it all to myself :'-)
How and why do rollers at the ends of berms work?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=_R2zHfzqINQ
I've recently been looking into optimum curve geometry for jumps and have somewhat fallen down the rabbit hole of designing back-to-back clothoid curves with minimum radius to target a certain g force as research from the skiing world shows it could probably help create more beginning-friendly jumps. Would be really interested to hear your thoughts on this topic and the physics/design of jumps.
Keep up the good work.
Plenty of comments explaining how the author’s point in the beginning is incorrect:
“if you extend your legs and push into the ground, you're pushing at right angles to the ground underneath your wheels, which doesn't help propel you forward at all”
The motion of your body when pumping is not at a right angle to the ground.
The conservation of angular momentum idea is valid as well, and if you can reduce your angular inertia by moving your CG toward the center, you will rotate faster.
Get a small weight on a string and dangle it down with one hand. With the other hand loop your finger and thumb around the string a little way down now this is acting as the pivot point.
Start the weight swinging slowly and pull up on the string (to shorten the radius) when its swinging and let it go back to full length at the end of each swing, the weight will gain speed and swing higher.
Now let the string stay at full length. Does the weight suddenly slow back down? No! Energy has been added and it is now continuing to move faster. And so will i when i am out of isolation back at the pump track
www.youtube.com/watch?v=myzdNqwnsB0
of course he’s gonna be faster
Duuhh.
What’s the Best Way to Swing a Playground Swing?
bit.ly/3uf2xbZ
And if you just want to go straight to the maths...
bit.ly/3wjJ3oO
First thought: Can someone please explain why the rabbit is wearing a robe at the pumptrack??
How Swings Work - Sixty Symbols
www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXo6WvHRs_I