Press Release: KaliKali is proud to announce the release of the all-new Invader. An ultralight, fully ventilated full-face helmet designed as an all-day in the saddle, go up, go down, go anywhere trail helmet.
The Invader is built with Kali Protectives high standard for safety and reliability utilizing our LDL, Low Density Layer, technology which offers impact protection against rotational AND linear forces by crushing, shearing and rotating during certain types of impacts.
The Invader is ready for aggressive descending with a unibody chinbar which passes the motorcycle chinbar test. It has massive vents to help you stay cool while climbing, and a magnetic Fidlock buckle to make taking it off a breeze. Of course, the pads are antibacterial and the visor is adjustable, plus we added an integrated accessory mounting system for your camera or light.
If you are the type of rider who chooses tougher lines, attacks the rock gardens or is looking for some added protection for your long days shredding trail, but you don’t want to spend your time fooling around with a detachable chinbar or overheating in a full-face DH helmet, then the Kali Invader has landed and it’s designed specifically for you and your adventures. Don’t forget that as with all Kali helmets, the Invader comes with a lifetime crash replacement policy. You crash it, we replace it.
The Invader is available immediately online at
kaliprotectives.com and through Kali’s global network of retail partners.
Weight 640 grams (size S)
Price $225 USD
In the 80s I helped put on a large, regional race. We had some bad crashes, but the only fatality was a rider on his way to a spaghetti dinner falling in the gravel parking lot and hitting his head on a rock. I don't care if it's level, uphill, or downhill, always wear your helmet. Without a brain you're just a jellyfish with a spine.
If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough!! Or wear a super 3r..
Almost lost a leg to infection, that shit is no joke.
Hey now...what'd I ever do to you?
yeah it's pretty shocking to see "Joeys" all geared up and even on a proper bike (sometimes) and then just sit there and ride off a drop without the faintest idea of what's about to happen.
let's responsibly help our friends progress and not throw them on a dh bike and take them to the park. F*ck - just bc Brandon and Fabio make it look effortless doesn't mean you can hop on a bike and hit the park. Just like how i'm not going to free solo a desert tower just because Honnold can climb a wall in yosemite.
Pinkbike father figures moralizing on using fullface helmets and elbow guards for trail riding. There are profound consequences to your mental game if you think like thatZ If you are that scared you are doing it wrong. There are tools to learn skills and gain more confidence.
How often do you see articles on riding technique? That Gives fantastic room for shitty coaches to do shitty work and a particular person will come and aay: I can go to Whistler, I did skills clinics. Do you know how many times I hear Joeys who I know to be Joeys for years say year after year: oh I need to get better at jumping?
So to answer your first paragraph: these people coming to a bike park with empty bag of skills, that is their first mistake. We all did it. But some of us were doing at least basic homework.
If you are a 40+yr old with more responsibilites than Actual risk of injury then please realize That if you don’t learn to ride and manage risk, manage fear, then MTB is too dangerous for you. Armor is not a safety to buy. It doesn’t make you much more confident, the very fact of wearing armor to a fricking trail ride is a sign of lack of confidence. This is a dangerous mind set. There are many online sources of information how to practice. Many people here should go practice instead of teaching people In half lids how to behave responsibly. Guess what maybe the “extreme sports” aura is a bit too much for you to risk and you should stick to fireroads? Either this or get your ass to Deliberate practice. It’s a very rewarding practice. Treat it like vertS on Strava
I just observed a bunch of folks telling a person who practices jumping, tell her to pad up. She was fighting for gaining skill and confidence, and they all just virtually told her she is reckless and better be more careful. It's such a hard process to get someone to understand that anything is achievable when trained an practiced methodically in safe environment and they virtually just told her she is not in safe environment. f*ck yes, Congratulations. I just wonder... how much of it is being bitter that some people are not as scared as you? Care? Really? you can dress up any complex with "care". Oh I shouted at you to not hang out with this dude, grounded you, because I care about you Billy! Oh Honey... you are going skiing, please be careful, please remmber that you are a father of the family. I just care about you. - No you are caring about your god daamn self.
As far as learning the correct technique, I agree. However, 1 of these 2 crashes mentioned happened when my front tire got slashed and came out of the rim, so technique was not the issue.
holy sh*t, TL R
where the hell is @WAKIresigns
also, i'll pay you to put your thoughts on a blog, youtube channel, insta, literally anywhere other than here so that every comment section doesn't clog up like my arteries after too many double cheeseburgers.
I'll start the GoFundMe and throw in the first Hamilton ($10).
Thanks Kali for keeping it real.
This helmet like other Kali helmets started the conversation on low-g linear and rotational impact.
The stage is a enduro race helmet. This is a trail helmet you can ride in all day.
.... cause teeth never go out of style.
Get better soon!
Also... although taking the chinbar on-and-off is easy and quick, it's getting tiresome and I've even forgotten to do it a couple times. But the biggest eye-opener for me has been that once I put the bar on, the helmet is actually so well vented, that I typically just leave it on for the rest of the ride... this has me thinking that my next helmet should just be a nice lightweight highly vented full face for my normal aggressive rides and enduro races (have a full DH rated full face for park). I see more and more people rocking light full faces for everyday trail riding and hope it's a trend that sticks... makes a lot of sense really.
Not sure... thoughts?
I probably look like an asshat with my helmet on, but it just seems so logical. There are some trails where it's too much, but when the snow clears I'll be wearing the FF more frequently - but I've got to be sure to be extra polite to the other trail use groups, I think they see the helmet and make assumptions.
Obviously can strap them to a backpack, but has anyone found a good solution when riding with a hip pack? I can wear the chinbar like a necklace, but then any crash, if my neck extends back at all, leaves a perfect lever to crank/crack my neck spine bones against the chinbar. Thanks for the advice, and pumped that more people (myself included) are seeking reasonable amounts of protection.
When I was riding with my Bell Super 2R, 90% of the time, it was as a half shell. The Proframe doesn't give me that option.
Pros shouldn't wear whatever if they don't want to just in case someone wants to look like them.
Pain's a good teacher; let people learn.
It is quite literally the norm to see arm/knee pads in BC. More full faces each year, and even the odd chest protector. Seeing someone without gear is abnormal. Crazy how this differs based on location. I'm sure trail difficulty has something to do with it.
I'll take this discussion head on, We do a lot of testing, in-house and out. We strongly believe in our science and philosophies (test standards require our helmets to be too hard). We test at many labs all around the world, unfortunately we get very different results in each lab. Which one should I trust the most? the one that gives the best results?
If we had all the labs in the world test and list all helmets according to each labs results according to their rating of performance (based on that labs and lab engineers principles and methodologies), I doubt we would get two labs with the same listing of helmet performances.
Currently lab tests are subjective. One lab might pass a helmet another will not. Some labs test 8 helmets randomly (which is my favorite because you can’t design to specific points), other labs test 2 or 3 in exact same spots…. Which I feel is statistically weak.
Also if you test 10 different helmet brands the exact same spots (lets say 2 inches left of the crown) certain helmets will win out because of their shape design… where as if you take those exact same ten brand of helmets and pick another spot (lets say 2 inches above right brow) suddenly the performance list of the helmets is reversed.
To evaluate helmet performance I truly feel you need to evaluate much more than one lab… not to mention I believe all our testing is antiquated… these tests were all design back in the 70ties and does not to low G hits (below 70 G) into accounts. And the fact is almost 80% of impacts happen at low Gs… so when we design only for high G impacts, we increase concussion chances at 80 % of impacts.
However I will never criticize any lab trying to create empirical comparative data… I believe V tech as many other labs are trying to do an excellent consumer informative job. I wish many more labs would do this and between all the labs maybe truer picture of helmet performances would develop.
Meanwhile I stand by what KALI does. I have gotten different results from many different labs, and we will continue to push the latest technologies in the hopes of reducing rider’s chances of concussion… that is our ultimate mission. And not only ours. There are many other like minded brands (and their engineers) I’m honored of working along side with… and though our production methods and material choices differ, and hence test results may differ from lab to lab, I see us all pursuing the same over reaching goal of improving rider safety!
Meanwhile I do hope you will consider researching how labs test, why they get different results, and differnt brand core values – and above all keep riding!
That said, I think that response leaves unanswered some valid questions about Kali's design concept.
Your main point is that testing is arbitrary because test-impact-location is arbitrary, and that seems indisputable. But that only spotlights what is, to me, the #1 concern with Kali's design, which is whether the LDL covers enough of the inside surface of the helmet to be confident that they'll function as intended in a crash. With 6D's ATB-1T, the entire inner surface of the helmet engages the ODS. Other techs like MIPS Spherical or Wavecel cover the great majority of the inner surface. Even the tech that's most similar to Kali's, Leatt's, appears to cover more of the inner surface. So, while test-impact location is arbitrary, the fact that the Interceptor is the advanced-design helmet that suffered most from that arbitrariness doesn't seem like a fluke.
The other question I still have is how in the heck the Interceptor is scoring worse than so many helmets with no safety tech, simple EPS shells. Even if the test impacts missed the LDL every time, I'd still expect the Interceptor to outperform any old-design helmet due to the dual-density EPS alone. But in VT's tests it scored behind the $50 LG Le Tour, the $23 Bell Adrenaline, the $40 Garneau Eagle, the $99 TLD A1, and the $25 Schwinn Excursion. That makes no sense at all to me. What gives?