Lapierre DH720 Review

Sep 17, 2010
by Mike Levy  
photo
2010 Lapierre DH720

The DH720's frame, which is the exact same as used on the higher end DH920, is very impressive in person. While beauty is always in the eye of the beholder, everyone who's seen the bike up close has raved about its great looks. Hydroformed tubes and an awesome racey color scheme certainly set it apart from the crowd, especially here in B.C. where we don't see many of these French exotics. Starting up front, you'll find a short 1 1/8th head tube that uses a low stack height, integrated headset. Just aft of the the head tube you'll be able to spot the first of a few of the neat details on the DH720's frame: built in fork bumpers. While certainly not the first or only company to use these, it's nice to see them on the bike as they are a no nonsense way of protecting your frame and you know that they'll always be in the correct position. This is also the point at which the shift and brake lines enter the frame if you plan on routing them internally, not something you see on many DH bikes. One other interesting feature on the frame is the protective rear disc guard that is bolted to the non-drive side chainstay. It's a sturdy aluminum thing that covers an 8" disc, but is removable if you feel you don't need it.


photo
The DH720 uses built in fork bumpers and internal cable routing

The Lapierre is the first DH bike that I've seen that uses the relatively new press fit bottom bracket system - BB30. While it certainly makes for clean lines and possibly a better sealed and longer lasting bottom bracket, this was my first experience with this system and I was eager to see how it held up throughout a wet B.C. Spring season. The chain guide mounts via the now common ISCG-05 pattern. All of the pivot hardware (minus the shock mounting bolts) are anodized aluminum that not only look great, but also shaves a few grams over steel bolts. It's also nice to see an aluminum 12 x 150 mm axle as opposed to a heavy steel unit. The low slung shock is protected from trail debris by a bolt on carbon guard that manages to look factory while also doing its job.


photo
The DH720's bolt on aluminum disc guard

The DH720 uses Lapierre's FPS2 suspension system that is comprised of two short links and an enclosed rear triangle that create a virtual pivot point out in space. There are quite a few virtual pivot point bikes that all resemble each other, but a lot of them work on different principles and therefore have their own ride characteristic that set them apart from one another. It is important to remember this before making any sweeping statements about one design being the same as another simply due to it bearing a resemblance. As the FPS2 goes through it's travel and the top link compresses the shock, the virtual pivot point actually moves up and reward. Have a look at how FPS2 works on the Lapierre site. Uniquely, the lower shock mount is actually bolted to the downtube, as opposed to welded. I could only imagine that this simplifies the manufacturing process quite a bit, but it also makes access to the cable exit point a bit easier.


photo
A closer look at the DH720's FPS2 suspension



Lapierre DH720 geometry, size small:

Head angle65 degrees
EFF Seat Angle69 degrees
EFF Top Tube585 mm
Chainstay445 mm
Bottom Bracket364 mm
Actual Frame Size (seatube length)420 mm
Wheelbase1140 mm


Lapierre offers the DH720 in only two sizes, the small that you see above, and a large size with a 600 mm top tube length. Have a look at the geometry to see if one of the two sizes will work for you,




The Build

The DH720 is the less expensive option of the two complete DH bikes that Lapierre offers (they also have the Bos Stoy equipped frame kit). The build is well thought out with a mix of affordable, but strong and reliable parts that most riders will find more than worthy of long days in the bike park or Sundays on the race course. Front suspension is handled by RockShox with their Boxxer Race. The Race fork uses the same 35 mm stanchion platform as its more expensive siblings, minus some of the fancy internal bits. Adjustments include external rebound speed and external compression damping. The rear of the bike is suspended by a coil sprung Fox RC2 damper that lacks the boost valve adjustment of the RC4, but still lets you tinker with both rebound and compression settings.


photo
A Syncros integrated stem and FR31 handlebar are used up front and it's interesting to see
a standard 1 1/8 head tube on the DH720

Specifications
Release Date 2010
Price $5299
Travel 200 mm
Rear Shock Fox DHX RC2 (241mm x 76mm)
Fork Rockshox Boxxer Race
Headset Semi-Integrated Cartridge
Cassette Shimano HG61 9S 11X28
Crankarms Gravity Moto X DH, 170mm with 38T ring
Chainguide e.13
Bottom Bracket BB 30
Pedals None
Chain Shimano HG
Rear Derailleur SRAM X-9
Front Derailleur N/A
Shifter Pods SRAM X-9
Handlebar Syncros FR31 20x740
Stem Syncros Bolt On 50mm
Grips Lapierre
Brakes Formula RX 203 mm rotors
Hubs Lapierre
Rim Alex FR32 32 holes
Tires Hutchinson Barracuda MRC Med/Low 26x2.50
Seat Syncros FL Crmo White
Seatpost Lapierre AL-6061 31.6 mm


photo
The FSA Moto X cranks fit into the DH720's Press Fit B.B. shell

While the DH720's spec is put together to be competitive, but also retail for a reasonable price, Lapierre also offers the higher end DH920. Using the same frame, the DH920 is outfitted with a mix of Shimano Saint components, Mavic Deemax wheels, as well as higher end and more adjustable suspension.



Riding Impressions


The DH-720's rear suspension was impressive on every sort of terrain that I rode it on. From rooty and rocky tech sections that would make any rider pause, to high speed and rough tracks at Whistler, the rear of the bike felt forgiving and versatile. I was very impressed with how well the bike rolled over rough terrain at speed, it certainly felt as if it's FPS2 suspension held an incredible amount of momentum when crossing chundery bits of trail that I know from experience have slowed down other bikes much more. With the stock 350 lb spring fitted on the Fox RC2 rear shock I sat into just over 30% of the stroke, not an incredible amount of negative travel, but the French bike felt just as forgiving as bikes that require more sag to feel comfortable. The stout rear end and short stiff links of the FPS2 system tie together a chassis that is as stiff as any rider could ever hope for and it never once had that soft feeling that some wimpier bikes can be prone to. Pedaling wasn't as much of a chore as on some bikes and it accelerated quite well out of blown corners and while sprinting for mock finish lines. Although braking felt mostly neutral, there was some slight stiffening that could be felt, but not enough to cause any concern.


photo
Crab Apple Turns - Whistler, B.C.


The geometry of the French bike is a slightly askew of normal, although the numbers may appeal to riders who know what they are looking for. The head angle of 65 degrees is tucked in a touch steeper than is popular among many riders these days, but I never found that to be a hinderance at any point, even when the trail turned steep and gnarly. It is very easy to get caught up in the 'slacker is better' forum banter and find yourself convinced that you need a chopper bike like the pro's, but the reality is that you have to be going at quite a pace to have those relaxed numbers work well for you. The number that does standout from the rest is the wheelbase - just under 45". Having come off a number of bikes with longer stances, I struggled to get comfortable on the DH-720 when speeds picked up. I could feel that the bike's FPS2 suspension working well and egging me on to go faster, but the short length of the bike gave me an unattached feeling over rough terrain and it had a tendency to feel nervous when things got hairy. It is too bad because the suspension on the bike is topnotch, even with the OEM level Fox RC2 shock that lacks some of the tuning options. The possible upside to the bike's unique handling will be for shorter riders who don't have the leverage to manhandle a limo length DH bike, and I could also obviously see the bike doing well on tighter and slower tracks. The rear wheel feels like it is tucked in close under the rider which made the bike very manageable at slow speeds in technical sections that would be a handful on most other DH bikes, but on faster rough sections I found myself wishing for a longer bike that would have felt more planted. While the larger size shares the same 445 mm (17.5") chainstays, it does gain an extra half inch of length in the top tube that allows for a more forward biased riding position that should make the rear end feel a bit more stretched out. I wish more companies altered their bike's chainstay lengths according to sizes in order to fine tune the handling.


photo
Up to speed on Whistler's World Cup Singletrack


A note on the Lapierre's sizing...

Lapierre's DH bikes are only available in two sizes that are labeled small and large, but if you are thinking about picking up your own DH-920 or DH-720 you'll want to spend a few extra minutes looking over the geometry before deciding on which size you'll be best on. At 5'9" I can ride either size, but having spent a lot of time on our small test bike I'd recommend a large for any rider who is my height or taller. The Lapierre is a very compact DH bike with a wheelbase of only 1140 mm (44.8") and this is very evident when riding it at speed.

The Parts


• I was impressed with the Hutchinson Barracuda tires that the DH-720 came with. No flats and great predictable traction in all conditions. They are showing a bit more wear than I would have expected, but that's the price you have to pay for tires that perform this great.

• The Formula RX brakes have plenty of power and a firm feel, but lack modulation and feel quite wooden at the lever. They were not popular with any rider that jumped on the DH-720.

• The Syncros FR31 bar was not a favorite with anyone who sat on the Lapierre. The given geometry numbers of the bar are not anything out of the ordinary, but it felt awkward and unnatural. It was swapped out with something more familiar for the duration of the test.

• The Alex FR32 rims are not the most interesting hoops out there, but they took a beating during my time on the DH-720 and held up great. They should be on your short list if you are looking for some relatively inexpensive rims that are still reliable.

• The Boxxer Race fork that is used on the front of the DH-720 proves how far along suspension has come over the last few years. I can remember many years ago when this entry level fork used far more primitive damping and could be a handful, but this 2010 model does well to dispel any of those negative feelings. It was reliable, the adjustments worked well, and it did a very good job of handling anything that we threw at it.

photo
Crap Apple Turns - Whistler, B.C.




The Lapierre DH-720 is a rare and exotic bike in our neck of the woods and its ride proved to be just as unique. Its rear suspension tames rough terrain as good as any design and the the bike accelerates quite well. The DH-720's most positive attribute is it's ability to carry an incredible amount of momentum over rough and lurching terrain that will have other bikes losing speed. The compact wheelbase may put off some riders, and they may be right, as in some places the short machine felt a touch overwhelmed, but I can certainly see this French bike shining in many places regardless.


For 2011 Lapierre has introduced an entirely new DH bike that uses their PendBox suspension system. The new bike also features revised geometry that includes not only a slacker head angle and longer top tube, but also a longer wheelbase as a result. I've had a chance to spend two days on the new bike in the Chatel bike park and came away very impressed. Stay tuned for a more in-depth review down the road.

Visit Lapierre's website to see their entire range of bikes.

Author Info:
mikelevy avatar

Member since Oct 18, 2005
2,032 articles

79 Comments
  • 5 1
 Lol, they talk about how the Boxxer Race handled everything fine but throughout the entire article they are riding a CR1 tuned Boxxer. I do believe you thoroughly tested the bike in stock form at one point or another, I just found it kinda funny to see the entire article with the CR1. Anyways, sick bike and nice review. Thanks!
  • 4 2
 Yes on the best photo shoot we did, the CR1 was on the Lapierre. The Race is a great fork for the average consumer. Remember these are just pics and no need to be too critical about them.
  • 1 1
 Haha, yeah I realize that. Besides, it would be silly to have a CR1 sit around when you could have it on this sweet test bike. I know the Race is actually a pretty great fork for the money, I had a quick ride on one and was impressed.
  • 1 0
 is there any complaint about the botto, bracket height because it seems to be fairly high
  • 2 1
 But will dh720 be produced in 2011 ? Dont think so. I thought Lapierre has already chosen some kind of single pivot system, not virtual.

This is nice. Reminds me of old Glory and Sunday.

P.S.

Enjoy tuning your rear shock Big Grin
  • 1 1
 You can put it upside down and have no problems. Also the carbon guard is easily removable Wink
  • 1 1
 aaaa zakxx! another one moved from DH-Zone to PB! more critters in here...
  • 1 1
 what is fork bumper?
  • 2 1
 this eye looking thing near the head tube. Protects the frame against hits of fork upper legs between crowns
  • 2 1
 Is this a DW-link infringer or Maestro infringer???? It's definitely infringing on something cause you can't get 'em in the US even though La Pierre has US distribution.

LOOKS SICK REGARDLESS!
  • 3 1
 I was gonna say the rear almost reminds me of the Glory. I'm not sayin they stole the Maestro set up but it sure does make me think Glory when I see it. Looks like a sick ass bike though. Mad props to Lapierre on building one hell of a machine.
  • 1 3
 Vpp.
  • 2 4
 looks absolutely nothing liek DW or maestro, perhaps a bit closer to VPP but still very different, the lower link points upwards rathern than downdards and the upper link is almost vertical, very different placement of pivots
  • 2 1
 The VPP patent is broader than Maestro or Dw link, thats why there is a problem.
  • 2 2
 A base of SC VPP patent is simple: single piece swingarm travelling on two counter rotating links. It's clear and simple + they've patented it quite early from which they gain a lot.

Lapierre uses two links rotating in same direction similar to many others, basicaly meaning that these patents are weak. That's why there is so much buzz around maestro, dw bla bla blaa. On one way it is stupid to talk about "obvious similarities" but on the other hand sorry manufacturers it is just confusing whether you like it or not.

At the same time the guy at SC responsible for VPP patenting process must be pretty proud of himself. Every other brand describing an own system has to push "virtual pivot point" through their mouth Razz
  • 1 0
 You can't buy this bike in the US because it infringes on TWO patents. The first is one of the virtual pivots and the second (and this is all based on what the sales rep told me) infringes on the Horst patent. If you're going to Canada to smuggle one back down here can you please get me some Cubans?
  • 1 1
 how come does it interfere with FSR and VPP? If it does then how come Cove sell their new G-spot for instance...
  • 1 0
 Thats BS, DH-920 infringes the VPP (lapierre calls it FPS2) and the spicy/zesty infringe the FSR (OST). 2 different systems.
  • 1 1
 spaced I'm a bit confused here... are we talking about Santa Cruz VPP or in general about all suspension systems with virtual pivot point location?
  • 1 0
 Santas VPP. I remember the whole confusion when the dh-230 came out. There was an extensive topic about it on ridemonkey if I remember right. The VPP patent can be found in google patents if you want to see it.
  • 1 1
 Yea but... there is a significant difference between Santa VPP and dh230. Upper link rotates in counterwise direction to the lower one. Then the difference between Maestro, older Dw-link, latest COVEs this Lapierre's stuff lies only in pivot locations. That fact alone lets other brands do similar stuff. I'm not a specialist but I think Santa did their system and patented it before anyone else tried something similar. When forementioned similar guys started patenting theirs there have been already a couple of bikes including two links rotating in same direction with monopiece swingarm: Karpiel for instance.
  • 1 0
 Im not sure Karpiel was patented. Also the patents after VPP are much more specyfic. I think the. Also im not sure - upper and lower links turn in opposide directions in fps2 and vpp if Im not wrong, the differance is that they are also opposite to each other vpp/fps2 wise. Look up the patent maybe because Im really guesing now. Im sure santa blocked the fps2 in the us but thats all I know really.
  • 1 1
 I'm also guessing but what are the internet forums for?! Smile Thing is, I did some CAD drawings for my own stupid frame project which had pretty much similar system as FPS2. Before I started modelling in 3d Studio I wanted to check whether the stuff works at all: if I am achieving desired travel at desired shock stroke so that rear tyre doesn't hit the seat tube (without getting stupid chainstay lengths). Then I looked into chain growth which came up at 4cm! So I had to play with the pivot locations and link lengths to get it down under 2cm. That changed the design a lot to be honest. More I was going into it more I was noticing that having upper link as vertical as possible helps as hell, because it drags the rear wheel to the frame abit down so the wheel goes up very quick. Then just for fun I tried VPP system and... that was so simple to achieve desired leverage with minimal chain growth and short chainstay.

(I did not take into account any rising/falling rates which is pretty much the most imporant thing - so in a way: FAIL!) you can see my terrible attempts in my albums.

To sum up: my guess is: verticaly positioned upper link in FPS2 might interfere with VPP patent because stuff gets very similar in swingarm movement regardless of shock rotation direction.
  • 1 0
 I actualy like a more rearward rear but around 15mm is as much as most ppl need. As for 3d studio modeling - isnt solid edge or works better for that?
  • 1 0
 heh... I'm quite happy to come to the level I reached with 3D MAX, AutoCAD, PS, Illustrator SketchUP (what's to learn there?! - you would be surprised Wink )and few more. Soon I will have to learn Revit, Premiere, After Effects and Vray. Fitting into my brain or actualy time schedule a program that has nearly nothing to do with my profession would be quite hard Smile So Solid Works, Inventor, Rhino: in the next life if time allows...
  • 1 0
 Auto CAD, 3dMax and After Effects in 1 proffesion? What do you do? Im trying to put Solid Edge into my head while Im still studying but it takes time.
  • 1 1
 Hello Neo: I am the architect...
  • 6 2
 great machine
  • 7 1
 right... because u didn't give me the last one after u tested it, can i at least have this one???? it's not like u need it anyway Smile
  • 1 9
flag Atrak (Sep 17, 2010 at 0:23) (Below Threshold)
 cane creek angle Headset could easily rectofy any kind of HA issues when the going gets steep.
  • 14 1
 not with a 1 1/8 headtube
  • 3 1
 65 degrees is not steep at all.. and certainly not an 'issue', that was pretty much standard in 2007 (think champery WC)
  • 3 2
 I own one, and its the best bike ive ever ridden, made me addicted on MTB even more than before Smile .
  • 7 2
 i hope the seat is easy to clean cause so many people are going to jizz when they ride this
  • 9 4
 Why post a review on an out dated frame? We don't want to hear about the old Lapierre DH. We want reviews on the new one.
  • 2 2
 Imagine one of these at COC!
  • 5 1
 He needed time to review the bike, it takes more than one ride and initial impressions to see if a bike is reliable. I wouldn't be surprised if a thorough review of the new model would be a bit after its release
  • 1 0
 i think it needs french (mavic) wheels
  • 1 0
 To the comment that a 65 degree head angle is not steep. I can guarantee you none of the top riders at Champery were riding a 65 head angle in 2007. Just cuz the manufacturer specs a 65, doesn't mean the WC guys are riding.
  • 1 2
 I saw this bike lately, it looks even better in reality it's just amazing. Attention to detail and asthetics are top world class. Saw it among Trek Sessions, Banshees Legend MKII Intense 951, and it still stood out. Makes some impact on you when you see it. It had black boxxers so it actualy looked even more impressive as fork didn't catch that much attention as the white one here.

Mike you look totaly pinned on these pics, then I guess it's one of those bikes you sit on and you feel at home Big Grin
  • 1 1
 I have one of these! Big Grin Well, I'm going too.

I demo'd one in Keswick, and then demo'd its 920 sister, and out of the two, I much preffered the 720.

I'm getting one in just under three weeks! Big Grin
  • 1 1
 I ride the 2007 DH230 and I love it. It's the earlier version of this one. The moment you throw your leg over the saddle you feel it's a bike that wants to be ridden at full tilt.
  • 1 1
 so how does it jump? I would imagine it might take to the air quite nicely with that shorter rear end (though 17.5" chainstays aren't that short...) Also, I love my Formula RXs, but I guess they are a little "on/off"
  • 1 1
 a sick Dh ride but even Giant figured out the rear shock has problems w/ that configuration and changed it - and, it looks dorky...but still, beats the h out of many other rear shock settings.
  • 1 0
 no actually Giant got sued and had to change it, Lapierre didn't infringe on patent rights...... but i like your dorky explanation better, much more scientific.....
  • 1 2
 no, actually Giant never EVER got sued by anyone, so i like YOUR dorky 'unscientific' response even better; and my scientific explanation comes from my involvment w/ a local Giant retailer, Giant rep, and staff who are almost all DH pro-racers [some of whom ride Giant] most of them i know well as friends and as a customer - FYI Giant changed the shock placement due to weight and clearance issues but have kept the EXACT same rear configuration of the shock and rear geo but raised the down tube allowing for more clearance for the shock - whatever you choose to believe based on your, ahem, knowledge and experience with lapierre or Giant, go for it, but next time you decide to get personal with my dorkyness in all your wisdom , get the facts not BS and rumours, and no matter, at the end of the day you get to ride in burlington [over the skyway bridge hahahahahaha ] or is it Stoney Creek 'over' the Devils Punch Bowl....and i get to shred Whistler, the North Shore and other sick trails! like to stay and chat, but sorry, don't have time for your issues cause frankly scarlett, i don't give a damn if i am right or wrong...so have the last word if you like, i'm off to Sunshine Coast to ride. happy trails sirknowsitall.
  • 2 0
 ps. i still think it looks dorky. :-)
  • 1 0
 PS PS just for those who love this ride - i like airborne101s comment: if it works for you, that's what counts and 'sweeping' statements about how just because the shock looks the same as others does not mean it is....so, egg on my beard sirbikesalot, for that comparison. As for it looking dorky, i look dorky too, but i can still shred...:-)
  • 1 0
 haha i find it hard to believe that thin little piece of carbon is going to protect the shock from a 40 kph rock impact
  • 1 0
 i like the look of this bike but its a bit late with the test , the new one will be out soon .......
  • 2 1
 note: 2nd pic is samuri pizza cat, not world cup singletrack.

great review, the bike looks mint
  • 1 1
 the link is a fps2 link, but it's almost the same as a dw-link, or a maestro-link.. sweet bikes, rides sick!
  • 1 1
 The lower linkage moves the opposite way compared to the maestro-link.
And I would like to quote: "There are quite a few virtual pivot point bikes that all resemble each other, but a lot of them work on different principles and therefore have their own ride characteristic that set them apart from one another. It is important to remember this before making any sweeping statements about one design being the same as another simply due to it bearing a resemblance"
  • 1 0
 Somebody knows only the frame weight? Or with shox... Thanks!
  • 1 2
 A slacker HA, longer top tube and longer wheelbase has already been implemented on the brand new 2011 Lapierre DH bikes with the new Pendbox Suspension System.
  • 1 0
 looks like the older model
  • 1 0
 that's one beefy rear triangle!
  • 1 0
 It´s my bike and i love it.

Great
  • 1 0
 so CLEAN!
  • 1 1
 Press fit BB? Why not add an Ashtablua crank? Ugh.
  • 1 1
 super sexy , please santa ...hook me up
  • 1 1
 i'll have to dream for now! sweet bike!
  • 1 0
 jokes, i have this bike now.!
  • 1 1
 almost looks like the session
  • 1 0
 mmm mmm mmm!
  • 1 0
 WOW
  • 1 1
 it looks super lighy
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.055153
Mobile Version of Website