Maxxis Aspen tire review

Sep 29, 2010
by Cory Hemminger  
I enjoy riding fast, rolling singletrack but have no problem dialing up the tech on the steep and rooty stuff that is really common in this area. To that end, I'm always on the lookout for a fast-rolling tire that can hold its line through varying terrain. The Maxxis Aspen falls into this category and I've been running the tire for the past few months to see if it can live on the edge as a summer and fall tire.

Read on,
photo

Technical info:

There are eight versions of the Maxxis Aspen, and each has its own width (2.1", 2.25"), TPI (60, 120), bead (folding, wire), and size (26", 29"). All variants incorporate a mixed 62/60 durometer rubber compound, with a higher duro center ridge being complemented by softer corner knobs. The 2.25" Aspen used for this test employed a folding bead with a durable 60 TPI casing and it weighed in at 710 grams, which is about 25% higher than what is claimed (570g) on the Maxxis website.

Editor's note - Our Aspen tires were from the first production run (710grams) and have since dropped to 570g thanks to changes made by the tire's engineers. This has resulted in an even lighter and faster rolling tire.

The Aspen can serve as both a front and rear tire, but it was used only as a rear tire for this review. It was paired with a 2.5" Maxxis Minion DHF EXO for the duration of the test.

On the bike:

photo

After throwing a tube into the tire, inflating it to 32psi on my Stan's Olympic rim, and installing the wheel on the test bike, the first thing I noticed about the Aspen was that it is honking big for a 2.25" tire, so keep that in mind if tire clearance is a known issue for your frame. On the trail, the tire's high volume benefits the rider by smoothing out trail chatter and reducing the likelihood of a buzz-killing pinch flat, while the rounded tire profile makes for predictable, stable cornering, as there isn't a whole lot of unpredictability or slippage as you transition from the center to the relatively aggressive, if rather small, side lugs.

photo
Maxxis Aspen with four months' wear. Note the shallow tread depth and widely spaced lugs that help the tire roll great on hardpack. The tread pattern also contributes to mediocre performance in the wet, but the Aspen isn't meant to be an all-season, all-rounder.

With its chevron-shaped center tread, the Aspen excels while riding on hardpack, hooking up without fail and rolling extremely fast despite its rather portly weight. The tire breaks free occasionally while climbing in loose and dry summer conditions, but inevitably regains its footing on the next pedal stroke and has much more bite in these conditions than a tire like Maxxis' own CrossMark. In the wet, the minimalist tread sheds mud, dirt, and leaves exceptionally well, leaving the tire to do its work and the rider to concentrate on the task at hand instead of worrying about a tire that is packed up with dirt.

The Aspen performs similarly on downhill sections of trail, blazing down hardpack trails, while remaining skittish on loose washboard and over wet roots and rocks. Outside of its comfort zone, the tire doesn't offer the best braking performance I've experienced in a cross country tire, as the Aspen is prone to skipping around on rough and loose descents, but it's still decent enough when compared with other cross country tires. In these cases, one of the many tires with beefier treads in the 2.35" range would be more suitable.

The tire was run for about four months of trail riding and there were no catastrophic failures during that time. Pinch flats were never an issue and I experienced no sidewall tears or cuts while riding plenty of the rocky trails that litter British Columbia's southwest region. I had no problems airing it up with sealant and Stan's rim tape either, and the tubeless setup offered great compliance and rolling speed.

As for durability, the softer durometer side lugs and the transitional blocks are starting to show signs of breaking down, but in my opinion, the tire's excellent performance trumps any premature wear that you might experience. Whether or not you can live with that wear life depends on what you expect out of your tires (ie. durabilty vs. cost. vs. performance).

Sizing up the Maxxis Aspen

The Maxxis Aspen is marketed as a cross country tire, but it performs well enough in most conditions that it deserves consideration from trail riders looking for a fast, three-season tire. You will appreciate the Aspen if lots of pedaling is part of your repertoire and your trails are flowing ribbons of dirt during the spring, summer, and fall. Its high volume casing smooths out trail chatter and its fast-rolling tendencies are coupled with excellent hardpack traction while climbing and during most descents.

The Aspen is least impressive on loose-over-hard terrain where the tread's shallow center doesn't provide the same amount of bite as a beefier tire. Similarly, it's not great in the wet and mud (ie. some fall and most winter weather) although it isn't so terrible that it should be disqualified from occasional rides in these conditions. Wear life isn't fantastic, with the test tire starting to show side-lug wear after about four months of riding.

Overall, I was impressed by the Aspen and, based on my experience with the tire over the past couple months, wouldn't hesitate to recommend it for a rider who likes to put in mileage, but still appreciates the benefits of the tire's surprising traction in most conditions. The Aspen is not a freeride tire and it doesn't excel in many "Shore-type" situations, but it is more than capable as a trail tire that can be used until the trails get really wet and / or muddy.

MSRP: $50 (USD)
Manufacturer's website: www.maxxis.com

Author Info:
robot avatar

Member since May 1, 2001
7 articles
Report
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

19 Comments
  • 9 0
 like the nipples on the bike!
  • 2 1
 I tough the same éhé !
  • 9 0
 "dont take this the wrong way sir, but i want your nipples"
  • 2 1
 Smile the center tread looks like a little inukshuk
  • 1 0
 Thanks! They're all starting to break on the rear wheel though, so I'll likely go back to plain old brass for the next build.
  • 1 0
 I ran an Aspen (lighter, 2nd generation) on the rear of my 29'er hardtail earlier this year. It hooked up decent, not superb, but was super fast. My only real gripe with it was that like the Larsen TT's, it has a super thin sidewall and it tends to wear faster than the actual tread.
However, if I had to choose between an Aspen and a Crossmark I would probably reach for the Crossmark as it seems to last quite a bit longer.

Think of it more like a pinner version of the Ardent where you have to lean the bike quite a ways to get the side knobs to hook up.
  • 1 0
 I didn't have any issues with sidewall cuts or tears on the Aspen but I don't have a problem with tire tears in general. I agree with you about wear life.
  • 1 0
 The 570g claimed weight is a mistake apparently. I bought a couple of Aspen 26x2.25 60tpi foldable tyres and they weighed in at 684 & 706g. I contacted Maxxis direct about the discrepancy and was informed the 570g on the website was wrong and it should read 685g and that they will correct it.

We shall see.
  • 1 0
 And now Maxxis has the Ikon model on the horizon for anyone looking for something between the grippier Ardent and light fast rolling Aspen. The 29er guy above me should be happy that the Ikon has the EXO-protection in 2.2 for 29ers.
  • 1 0
 Actually, I dumped my 29'er and am just riding a Banshee Spitfire now. But, I am running the Maxxis Minion 2.5 Exo's set up tubeless. The Exo sidewalls make setting up those non-tubeless tires even easier with a bit of Stans. I would have been a bit nervous doing that with the Aspens.
  • 1 0
 Good review! Its a great 3 season tire and for those who bias fast rolling over traction.
  • 1 0
 Cory, how does it corner compared to the CrossMark?
  • 2 0
 Hope aspen will faster clean from mud than crossmark.
  • 1 0
 I really liked the idea of running a Crossmark until I bought a set and used them.... they were so bad I used them only a couple of times and took them off... Its a fail as a front tire on any real trail, and at best should only be used as a rear tire on really easy trails... For a fast rolling and durable rear tire on the XC bike I've had REALLY good luck and performance from the Larsen on the rear and a Folding Minion 2.35 on the front... a very reliable, fast rolling and good match.
  • 2 0
 I shoulda said I only use CrossMark on the rear for excellent rolling resistance.
  • 1 0
 I have got Crossmark on front and rear in my xc racing bike, and i cant cay anything bad about resistance. Sauser recomended them, and that i bought, but he is racing mostly dry, tails nearby deserts like CapeEpic for example and they rly fail on mud. Larsen TT are more lighter, but they disapeared on your eyes if you riding on asphalt roads.
  • 1 0
 I prefer the Aspen over the CrossMark because I felt it has better bite on off-camber stuff and does a better job of holding its line. As mentioned above, the Aspen sheds mud way better than the CrossMark.
  • 1 0
 To clarify the above, I prefer the Aspen over the CrossMark in general. I don't think that the Aspen gives up anything to the CrossMark, except wear life. When you lean over on the Aspen, those little side lugs hook up really well, better than the CrossMark, imo.
  • 1 0
 they remind me of maxxiz larsen tt's, both very good tires







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.070672
Mobile Version of Website