Despite countless articles, videos, and comments to the contrary, I don't see the whole clipless vs flat pedals topic as something that's worth vehemently debating. At the end of the day it all comes down to personal preference, and what a rider is trying to accomplish. It's unlikely that you'll see a cross-country racer stand on top of the podium with skate shoes any time soon, just like the winner of a slopestyle contest isn't going to be clip-clopping their way through the crowd to collect an oversized check.
That said, it's still interesting to take the pulse of pedal popularity every few years, which is the topic of this week's poll. Answer below to cast your vote in the never-ending clipless vs flats conundrum.
Ricky Bobby - get a hobby.
See what I did there?
I always called those "rat traps"
Oh wait, I forgot I’m on Pinkbike, pick a term and be a dick about it.
In German we actually call them “click pedals” - I always thought that quite fitting, can’t judge how well it translates, though.
Flats - yup, easy to define.
Cleated - no toe clips so why the term clip-less still around?
Cleated seems to make way more sense. Rocked the first versions of the SPD and so many more, many many Times, Looks (even the modified Delta’s, Crank Bro’s Mallets, Onza so seen a thing or more.
Flats
Cleated
Simple.
Either way, never tried them, but I like how its named after the sound. Just like the chapeau claque in France
(The PB way)
Was quite funny tbf.
I can’t help if I always win
"So find the ones that say pitted and get a jug."
"I thought you liked them without pits?"
"I do, but pitted means that they have have had the pits removed?"
"So shouldn't they be called pitless olives or something?"
"Probably they should, but they're not, just buy the freakin' olives"
I always think the power transfer argument is nonsense and I'm a long time clip rider. I use them because I don't like having to think about keeping my feet in place when I'm ploughing through rough terrain.
I have also never had a crash caused by being clipped in(unless you count that time I fell over at a traffic light after a couple beers at the pub....), nor had a crash that was made demonstrably worse by being clipped in. So it's pretty much all upside from my perspective.
But I have to disagree as you can get clips with large platforms where you 'feel' the pedal pretty much exactly like on flats. The difference is in how easy you can lift and move the back wheel, besides spinning way better circles which make it easier to finesse the power in tough climbs, AND the increase in connection when going through really chundery sections.
What you describe can be the difference between any two pedals of different design (be they clips or flats respectively).
As you can see from the poll, some riders went concave, some convex, so differences abound.
Your point isn't bad, just needs refinement.
And even set up that way, there was still slop when you went to weight the inside or outside of the pedal or twisted your foot into the pedal to drive torque into the bike in corners.
I ride for fun, and I prefer the challenge and satisfaction of keeping my feet on the pedals with good technique. Absolutely fine for others to differ.
But any sentence that contains the phrase "best of both worlds" is almost always garbage. For instance, air springs have gotten really, really good, but they're still not a coil.
Not sure how clipless pedals are a reminder of the roots of mountain biking. Both clips and clipless pedals come from road cycling.
For me, it is the feeling of the large, well-supported platform. When I am descending I like to get the middle of my foot right over the pedal spindle - something that is just not possible on clipless pedals. Also, clipless pedals (regardless of the platform size) always make me feel like I am standing on just the spindle/clip interface. No matter how stiff the shoe shank, I can tell that the only real point of contact is the clipless interface.
Went down the wormhole of XC racing/singlespeeding for the better part of a couple decades, riding clipless the whole time, and probably learned some bad habits as I no longer had a BMX bike to play on. It wasn't until upgrading my old hardtail singlespeed to a modern FS trailbike a couple years ago that I switched to flat pedals. Originally it was in an effort to unlearn bad habits learned from riding exclusively clipless for so long, and I figured I'd switch back at some point. I just find them more comfortable now and haven't bothered switching back.
Thinking of getting a gravel bike for longer mellow terrain rides/bike-packing and will most likely put clipless pedals on it.
The so called 'bad habits' are using the effects of being clipped in.
Like using your connecting for jumping. Won't make your crash, it just might be a different technique than you are forced to use on flats. Not sure that's a 'bad habit'.
Same with pretty much all skills touched on by this long debate.
It all comes down to some of the clipped in adaptation doesn't easily transfer to flats. But if you don't ride flats it quite literally cannot matter.
It's a purist thing. A way for us flat riders to feel superior. Ultimately we are not, but don't tell anyone.
Mine is that it is obvious and expected that a clip rider switching might have to learn things, but it only matters as a negative if a rider is switching from clips to flats. And that's the negative, not poor skills, just different.
Same with a rider that rides flats; put them on clips and they likely will not immediately be able to fully exploit the benefits of a clipped in shoe.
As someone that has riden clips (primarily) since childhood I can unclip in basically all situations without any conscious thought. Put a flats rider on there and they will be nowhere near that for years. Same with the automatic clip when comparing a new clip rider to an old hand.
Not a negative about flats, but a note about how switching from one to the other requires some real relearning.
Mike K help meeeeeee
I've always thought of flats for Street BMX or any kinda of jumps really
Clips for me is like "its serious time, i want the most control from my bike"
There is nothing worse than smashing a Rock section and you suddenly Get sucked down and then flicked up bouncing the feet - this is waaay worse with bikes with alot of kick - i cannot ride a Bike with high engagement hubs on flats, Just way to much pedal feedback.
When I switched to FiveTens that reduced that issue, but I still used what I knew to be grippy pedals as having that extra traction helps out a lot in more marginal situations.
With secure flats a lot of people struggle to get a 'good' placement and likely are peddling in the ways that could cause injury.
I get the facts you are presenting, but your interpretation is incorrect I believe.
I'm not saying they don't, but that is a pretty big word of mouth claim from an acquaintance.
I know many people who have been riding clipless for 30+ high mileage years with no issues. Properly fitted shoes, float, and correct gearing and crank length would also play a big factor.
The antecdotes of "I know this person who has had this luck..." only go so far. Some people are more or less durable than others. Some people fit on a bike quite well - and some people actually go to the expense of getting very good bike fittings done (as we all should), including q-factor on cranksets, etc. I am not here to suggest that there are not things that can be done to make clipless pedaling harmless - absolutely you can get an ideal or perfect bike fit done! My initial point was simply that utilizing flat pedals conveys less risk of some of these types of "sports" or overuse injuries because of the natural variation introduced by flat pedals. I don't think that is controversial.
MX soles with ribbed tread that allow lateral boot movement on the pegs are preferred.
But if you're telling the truth or not, what I'm saying is absolutely true, as evidenced by how many flat riders feel like they are 'loose' on clips because of the float.
Whatever your 'acquaintance' says to the contrary, that's the truth. Now, back with cleats that fit over the edge of the pedal knee injury was hugely common, but modern style clips pretty much solved that, again because they float, even with power applied.
I'm not even sure why you're arguing this. There are absolutely people who have knee and hip operations at sports medicine facilities due to biking for years or decades in slightly off bike fit. I have a dear friend who destroyed his meniscus over 3 decades of riding due to a slight miscalculation in the required q-factor of his cranks/pedal spindles.
You're just pretending that these injuries don't happen and that they are not the result of identical foot position in a slightly misaligned or imperfect bike fit. It's bizarre. Here is a direct quote from a bike-specific physical therapist's website: "Over 85% of the time, knee pain is related to the saddle and/or cleat positioning for those with clipless pedals. Due to the repetitive nature of pedaling, precise, millimeter-sized adjustments in position can make a dramatic impact on your knees."
If you simply google clipless pedals and knee or hip injuries you can find websites from medical practices and professionals, peer-reviewed and published papers on the subject, and more discussing the potential impact of clipless pedals and injuries to the foot, ankle, knee, hip and lower back.
When you're powering on a flat pedal your foot is basically locked into place, and you must unweight to move it. Again, not to a set position, either correct or incorrect. Just however you manage to get it seated.
Knee injury isn't from too far forward or side to side, it's caused by flexing the knee while the foot is rotated off center (center for that specific persons joints).
Now I get that you are correct in referencing clip pedals as a possible source of that, but what you miss is that literally 99% of the most serious pedaling bicyclists are using clips, so maybe they are just the common denominator, not the cause.
Your argument is like the people that claim seat belts cause injury because they can cite an example of one or two case, but forget that as most people use seat belts of course you will find some that caused injury, but always less as an average compared to not using them.
How can you argue that a spiked, flat pedal, with sticky rubber could possibly be the better constant location for lots and lots of knee flexing as compared to a clip with FLOAT?
I completely understand float on clips, I personally ride Crankbrothers Mallet DH pedals with (comparatively) huge platforms for a clip. But as I run them with the pins only part way out my feet can move to their natural orientation literally while I spin circles. How can you disagree with that?
1. I am NOT claiming that the foot position changes markedly during pedaling on a flat pedal (although it can if you consciously or unconsciously unweight and reset the foot on the pedal, as I often do when riding). I AM claiming that a flat pedal introduces natural variation in foot placement each time the foot leaves and returns to the pedal, and that this variation - in terms of absolute position and degree - does not exist with a clipless system, irrespective of float. This is because float allows for minute rotation of the toe/heel around the axis of the cleat, but that this degree variation is insignificant relative to the variation in placement on a flat pedal.
2. You are incorrect about what can cause knee (not to mention ankle, hip, lower back and soft tissue) injuries in cycling. Full stop. Case in point: knee injuries (much less the other types of orthopedic injuries referenced above) absolutely CAN be caused by "too far forward", "side-to-side", in addition to other misalignment characteristics. Some of the most common soft tissue injuries in cycling (e.g. patellar tendonitis, IT band friction/inflammation, deterioration of the meniscus) can be caused by exactly those alignment issues! Case in point: I have a friend who has been an avid road, gravel and XC-marathon racer for decades. He destroyed his meniscus specifically by pedaling with a slight misalignment in relative q-factor in his crankset and pedal spindle lengths as confirmed by his sports physician and his surgeon (who specializes in cycling cases). Similarly, I was beginning to get IT band pain from using clipless pedals on my trainer. I switched to flat pedals and the inflammation/irritation was gone instantly.
3. I am not saying that clipless pedals are evil. I am saying that if one would like to ameliorate the risk of sports injuries from cycling and they'd like to use clipless pedals, it becomes important that you get a comprehensive and near perfect bike fit. Does this mean that cyclists who fail to do so are doomed to injury? Absolutely not! As I have stated before, many people are more or less durable or susceptible to specific injury based on a combination of genetic and behavioral factors, combined with the actual amount of time participating in the activity.
Let me state it as a formula for you: (Probability of sports injury from imperfect bike fit + Clipless pedals) > (Probability of sports injury from imperfect bike fit + flat pedals)
4. All things being equal, a flat pedal represents less probability of the injury types I mention. This does not mean that flat pedals represent no injury probability. It simply means that variation in foot placement during pedaling bouts introduces less opportunity to wear down or overuse very specific portions of the cyclist's physiology. In contrast to clipless pedals, which create a significantly more consistency in absolute foot position, increase the opportunity to wear down or overuse very specific portions of the cyclist's physiology.
I get it. I made a claim that clipless pedals sometimes cause injuries as a result of ultra consistent foot placement and pedal stroke characteristic relative to flat pedals, given conditions of equally imperfect bike fit. You don't like this notion, because you use clipless pedals and you have not been personally injured in this way. Further, you enjoy the feeling and benefit of clipless pedals (of which there are many!). But please stop engaging argumentative tactics such false analogy, strawman, etc. It's not constructive and you're simply arguing against things I am not claiming.
If you'd like to, I'd welcome you to search pubMed or other research data bases for articles related to clipless pedal induced injuries. You'll find peer reviewed research and case studies.
What is your response to the fact that most all serious bike riders (meaning the vast majority of miles pedaled) are from riders using clip pedals, and therefore you would expect to see those injuries more than those from flat pedals. Again, simply due to the miles traveled.
Because basically all road riders clip in, basically all gravel riders clip in, all track riders clip in, BMX racers clip in, basically all cross country racers clip in...
See where I am going with this?
I do understand about injury from misalignment, where ones foot isn't 'flat' to the pedal and needs some adjustments to get the knee to operate optimally, but wouldn't that still be the same on flats?
You're right, I personally prefer to be clipped for all the benefits that entails, but I'm no maniac that claims they could never injure or that everyone needs to be clipped.
(See your arguments about strawmen, false analogies, etc.)
I have SPDs on all my bikes since they are cheap and I can use the same shoes between my MTB, gravel bike, commuter and fixie.
I way prefer time's mechanism. But I couldn't justify the price to put them on all my bikes...
Most riding I can get away with clipless - it's the sketchy stuff that I'd prefer flats.
Size 15-16 (50EU) shoes, I haven’t found boots that allow me move cleat deep enough so I’m not riding on tiptoes all the time, killing calves on descends. Tried cutting and modifying shoes with various levels of success, but that’s just nasty.
Moved to very very large flats (Catalyst XL) and I’m so happy now, calves bo longer die mid descent and my clown shoes are actually supported.
Apparently someone makes an adapter that allows moving cleat mounting holes deeper to the center of the feet, need to try those.
It’s so funny(not) that size 10 and size 15 shoes have same range of cleat adjustment. Also most manufacturers simply don’t have my size at all.
This position simply cannot be achieved on any clipless shoes - truly baffling to me. Mountain bike shoes need to be designed for a cleat-under-arch position.
No doubt, under extreme or very racy exertion there is some additional power to be had from a "ball of the foot" position. By I ride more "enduro" style - long, grinding climbs to justify the descents. No question, descending is better with the spindle under the middle of your foot. For me (and presumably others who prefer to optimize for descending) it would be well worth it.
Where I learned to ride modern flat pedals with pins and sticky rubber shoes was basically non-existent at that time. None of the local shops even carried 5.10.
I'd consider myself more pedal fluid as I don't take a binary stance; there was a time when I was flat but very clip curious. As I got older I realized I wanted to switch and eventually I came out to my family and friends
Time on flats has done more to tidy up my pedal stroke than years clipped in, and it’s more fun on dirt.
Bar width is so 2022.
No. They should be called bindings.
#PBFail
How many times can this be questioned
Flats are for beginners and people who think they are RAD
Clips are for serious riders that like to go fast…..