Spend a sunny summer weekend in Whistler and you'll likely see so many enduro and trail bikes that you'll wonder if there's any truth to that rumour of lift-access riding nearby. I think there is a bit of that, of course, but the rise of enduro racing has spurred development to the point where many gravity riders can have more fun - and go more faster - aboard a sturdy mid-travel bike than on a downhill sled. That's a bit of a worn-out trope these days, I know, but only because it's so true. At the same time, modern trail bikes are great tools for not only doing huge, character-building rides but, thanks to smart geometry, they'll also do just fine on some pretty rowdy terrain.
So, if I had to guess, most of us are probably thinking about less suspension-travel on our next bike rather than more.
Relatively short-travel trail bikes like the Stumpjumper (left) can do all the things pretty damn well, but the feeling of invincibility that comes with a long-travel bike and slacker angles (right) is hard to beat.
Or maybe not. According to our opening day survey, downhill bikes still make up the majority of the equipment being used in the Whistler Bike Park, and that doesn't even take into account the hordes of GT Fury rental rigs that surely live the hardest of lives. Further evidence to prove me wrong: World Cup downhill coverage, and especially the results and tech articles, are consistently among the most-read content on the homepage. Given that there's a good argument for them being the most advanced, most capable, and most interesting type of bike, that probably shouldn't be a surprise, though.
And while modern enduro bikes are convincing riders that they don't need 200mm to get the job done, they're also impressing with their climbing abilities to the point where many are trading their under-gunned trail bike for something more capable on the descents and only marginally worse on the way back up, if at all.
So, with that in mind, maybe it makes more sense to consider a bike with more suspension rather than less?
I already have one. My next bike will be a downhill bike, so it will definitely have to have more travel than my current bike.
That's not what she said.
I want RM Slayer...
I want something fast and light I can use for longer days and bigger climbs. Something a little more poppy and playful rather than a charger bike.
1. If it is "smarter" etc, it is more capav6and therefore you need less of it to get the same results. So you can enjoy the snappier, more playful nature of a shorter travel bike.
2. It's more fun, challenging and rewarding to do things with skill than monster truck through everything because the bike hides all your mistakes.
I do like a long travel bike though. That's why I have both
170/160 Tranny Patrol, and 130/120 Marin HawkHill
eMTB
Putting the grin into climbing.
Anyway - my mid travel 29er is a good compromise across all things and no, only I am its motor.
I could see if being viable if you did something like keep it in short travel mode all winter then go long travel when it is park season. But not for changing on a daily or weekly basis.
Um.....wait......what? (scratches head)
Why would you move to a place without mountains? (goes to the bathroom)
No seriously, why would you move to a place without mountains?..............I just can't............even..................
............................what?
I do still wish I could make some smaller changes, like you mentioned, for days at the bike park and flow trails or for days that are going to have really technical climbs and descents.
Sweet RSD Middlechild by the way. Very similar to my current set up (Pipedream Moxie in teal, ss).
The 29ers 130-140mm bikes are crazy capable and easier to move around and have fun.
And the Vienna woods dont require lot of travel at all.
One of the best decisions I made regarding MTBing.
Bet it shreds ;-)
With a good shock 130-140mm will feel like 160mm and ride like it yet you still get the more playful feel.
And there's the rub! FOR YOU, all you do is the Vienna Woods so why would you need something where more travel might be a good idea. If you don't go to distant places and ride a variety of things, you're fine.
For now, I'm a one bike person. My 170/160 Canfield does it all. Long fire road grinds, XC, and DH. Is it as good as a DH bike for DH? No. Is it as good as an XC bike for XC? No.
That said, EWS proves all day long that an 160-180 AM/Enduro rig is about the perfect choice when you only want one bike and plan to ride places more that a half an hour from your pad.
A snappier 140mm bike would be super fun, but probably get snapped.
Not really. Just very few bikes make it away from me alive, and that was a 110 travel bike that I over forked up to 140 and rode pretty hard. I thought it did all right for being a little bit beefed up XC bike that I rode like a rough and tumble all mountain bike. They sent new chainstays super quick when I discovered the crack and I was on my way again.
I for one am happy that it's not longer necessary to get a bike with more suspension than I need in order to get one that will hold up to being flogged.
You should be open to shorter travel bikes as there are tons of them that are built tough.
And good on ya getting a Rune up lots of climbs. I almost bought a Banshee Phantom a few years back but chose not to due to how it felt climbing.
I will say, my short travel bike (Marin Hawk Hill, 120r 130ft) is crazy capable, Most people really don't need as much travel as they have.
Getting a GG Smash as my next bike so I can swap seatstays and ride both 145mm and 120mm!
As it is though, it's hard to say. I mean, if I were to get as a second bike either a shorter travel trail bike, or a long travel party bike, it's almost like either one would be too close to my current bike's parameters to really justify. I guess if I were getting a new bike and had to keep a one-bike quiver situation, I'd probably stick to pretty much the same travel range, and instead be switching it up for geo/kinematics.
Longer travel 27.5 for moi.
I'm replacing my 150mm 29er with a 130mm 29er. Keep in mind that some local riders ride enduro stages with hardtails, full rigids, and short travel bikes pretty frickin fast. It's not a matter of being under-biked. More like under-skilled. Do long travel bikes make enduro stages easier? Hell yea. But that's what makes it boring.
I just like to ride for fun now. And mid-short travel bikes and hardtails are the funnest bikes out there.
Was riding with two guys yesterday. One on a Capra with a coil, the other on a decoy (borrowed bikes from the brother's collection). Capra climbed fine (obviously so did the decoy) but on the downs that extra travel made a difference. Trying to keep up I was bottoming out both ends. Part of that is setup, but with with extra travel that wouldn't be an issue.
I'm thinking a ripmo af as the next bike. I'm kicking myself for not getting the used range carbon from a lbs employee, "I don't need that much bike."
But, at the end of it all, I buy "Enduro" bikes.
Don't get real excited to watch enduro shit, tho.
Also always notice the kids on trails know all the DH riders names, but ride a trail bike. Probably depends where you live, but I know for where I do a DH rig is a waste of time & space.
Sold my DH 200mm bike a few years ago. Riding 160mm 29er. Best decision ever! With that said, I think I want 170/180mm 29er... :p
Only if i manage to convince my wife that I absolutely need a dedicated park bike, I will buy a trail bike with same amount of travel (150f /135r).
My modern hartail 29er with a 130 fork is as fast as my 2009 26er 160 going down thanks to the geo . The 27.5 full suss is faster down but slow as shit up (weight) the 26er climbs like a goat and is light but twitchy.
So by my reckoning a light 130 fs 29er would be the holy grail for me . Aka sb130
I would like a dedicated park bike for lift days, though, so if I happened to stumble on a deal on one, it could go more.
B/t the Lux and the SB130 there's a massive difference, but each time I ride either one of them I think, this is my favorite bike ever, I should just sell my other bike(s). But then I ride the other one and I am reminded why I have two(3). I will say both are considered short travel with 100mm and 130mm but I have never needed more when I ride them. Sure the Yeti is way faster down, but the Lux destroys it on the ups! I am confident I will never need more than 140mm of rear travel for my style of riding, and terrain. Plus I like to "earn my turns" so having more would get in the way of 95% of the ride time. I don't know how fast I am, you are probably faster than me, but I do race and push my bikes, and no enduro or xc course has left me wanting/needing a bigger bike.
So the full DH squish went 16 months ago and was not replaced. The mx bike benefitted from time served.
The 140/150mm 27.5 that was stolen 3 seasons ago also never truly replaced instead a 27.5 plus hardtail dropped into my lap for next to nothing. Funny thing happened. I love that bike. The band aid bike has won we over big time.
So here’s where we are with this question.
Def less travel then dh bike, but something geometry more relaxed then previous trail bike (sight carbon).
Obviously more travel then hardtail, although it was remarkable that I didn’t change any riding locations on this bike. I simply didn't give a shit much about it and it keeps a smile on my face. This bike always has a home.
So 29 for sure. It’s either new reign advance pro 1 at 146mm and I put up with over bike for 65% of my riding or New SC Tallboy 120mm with a 140mm fork and I make due for the gravity days as best I can while slaughtering the weekly trail rides.
I’m leaning towards the giant and the $1600 savings for alike builds.
Does that answer your question @mikelevy. ?
I own 170mm and tend to lore travel
I own 170mm and tend to less travel
I own 170mm and am happy with it
I own 150mm....
.
.
.
And so on
Ive also got a 160, 29 Hardtail. A lot of fun on the tamer stuff and a real challenge on the tough stuff, quite fatiguing in its own way. Its like learning how to really ride again, which is great in itself.
So, I would deduce that a....140 F/R 29er would be the sweet point for an all rounder.....perhaps.
And my Slash weighs.......32 pounds. I guess if I was exiled to the Midwest or someplace I'd go back to a hardtail.
Then again, if mountain biking is a passion rather than a website you visit, do what you have to to live where the trails are gnarly enough that an Enduro sled is what you want.
Riding a fuel currently with 120mm/120mm and tired of wondering if I am under biked.
Next bike I am going full send with travel- don't care about the Strava uphill times anymore.
How Much Travel Do You Really Need?
It's a 180mm freerider, but it pedals realy good. For me, it is THE “one for all“ bike.
Trail, park, tour, whatever...
It's much more capable and can do much longer days pedaling!
So, why not having the best or both world?
Where's Friday Fails ?
Be specific ffs
Bravi!!!!!!!! and thank you for wasting everybody's time!
Next MTB(In progress): home designed and made 130mm trail focused hardtail. Steel. 1x11. So pumped.
TR scout for the win.
Depends which side you're on...
Spend money
Spend money
That is definitely on my mind...