Polaris Debuts Fox Live Valve Electronic Suspension - Coming to Bikes Soon?

Jul 26, 2017
by Richard Cunningham  
Polaris RZR with Dynamix Active Suspension Technology
Polaris RZR XP Turbo Dynamix UTV debuts Fox Live Valve electronic suspension.


Fox invited me up to Scotts Valley, California, to ride their Live Valve electronic suspension system a number of years ago, when it was in the prototype stages. During that whirlwind weekend of riding their reactive suspension on mountain bikes, Fox walked me around a Polaris RZR UTV that was also wired with Live Valve suspension controls. After swearing to secrecy, the Fox Motorsports crew gave me the opportunity to drive some hot laps with the tricked out RZR on their test course to compare how the system performed when it was activated and not. It was impressive.
Polaris RZR with Dynamix Active Suspension Technology

Without Live Valve, the Polaris suffered body roll in the corners and brake dive. Flip the switch, and the RZR chassis remained close to ride height, which flattened the car through the corners and maximized the available suspension. Fox and Polaris developed the system for the Popular RZR for more than performance reasons. Live Valve's ability to react to violent steering inputs and angular acceleration is intended to be a safety feature to minimize the potential for a high-speed rollover. Polaris calls it, "Dynamix Active Suspension Technology." – RC


Polaris RZR With Dynamix Active Suspension Technology PR



What About Live Valve for Bikes?

Fox Live Valve
Prototype Fox Live Valve suspension.


So, when does Fox Live Valve enter production on mountain bikes? The unofficial story is that Fox was ready to launch it for the 2017 season, and in fact, I've seen frames in production with ports and bosses to integrate the system. Reportedly, Fox decided to hold off on the official Live Valve release for at least one product season, presumably, to adapt the workings to "metric" shocks, and also to expand Live Valve's range of tuning to enhance the requirements of more aggressive riders. The video below shows how the OHV shock operates. The mountain bike Live Valve system controls the fork and shock in a similar manner, but the damping requirements are significantly different in order to provide firm pedaling and, simultaneously, unhindered suspension action. The benefits, however, are the same: supple or firm suspension, exactly when you need it, and a stabilized ride height for consistent handling.

How Fox Live Valve Works



Author Info:
RichardCunningham avatar

Member since Mar 23, 2011
974 articles
Report
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

82 Comments
  • 70 1
 I wish my bicycle had a turbo. Turbo everything. Turbo my fox fork. Turbo this damn computer.
  • 31 9
 Turbo your mom...
  • 3 1
 Love me some turbo. My bike is one of the only things I own without one :/
  • 3 0
 @meathooker: Get some turbo quads
  • 2 2
 You could always just get a turbo levo...
  • 40 1
 Give me an ebike with shimano DI2 autoshift and fox live valve. I could be on a conference call while the bike climbed itself.
  • 6 0
 dont forget to bring a powerstrip with you
  • 29 2
 I need one of these live valves in my toilet, you know, to automatically handle the aftermath of a taco feast following an epic ride.
  • 26 0
 Technology not seen since the 1997 K2 Proflex 5000
  • 3 0
 Yes! The K2 "smart shock".
  • 3 0
 @spencer666: You if by smart you mean "not sealed against mud/moisture and ready to short out anytime"
  • 1 0
 Or the late 80s subaru vortex
  • 23 0
 Traction control? You mean bitch switch.
  • 4 0
 ya isnt that half the fun of mountain biking? wrestling with your bike on the edge of traction
  • 16 2
 Pretty neat, although it seems like a hassle. I d rather a bike remain a bike and not some computer operated apparatus.
  • 12 2
 What happened to simply simple things that worked simply with out the need for non simple things making them less simple
  • 9 0
 these things don't exist
  • 20 1
 They sucked, so we replaced them.
  • 11 0
 You mean fixed gear bikes with a steel diamond frame and rigid fork? Without a front brake, because that's unreliable and unneeded complexity.
I am not even joking. Enthusiastic riders from 1910 would scoff at you for using a freewheel, let alone of those ultra-complex 3-speed-hubs which only work reliably for 50 years between rebuilds (meaning strip & grease, nothing to wear out or replace in there..).

Liked your comment though. Simple beauty in there.
  • 2 0
 @theobviousfaker: I like you. You speak the truth. You name the place and I'll buy the beer
  • 1 0
 @theobviousfaker: All I want to do is get from A to B without breaking myself or the bike.
  • 4 0
 @fatduke: When I take my mountain bike, all I want to do is get from A to A while actually trying to break myself and the bike very hard, it seems.
I think the bike is already broken. The tubes of the frames rear triangle are only loosely connected to each other anymore and are moving in all kinds of directions. The fork is so beaten up you can actually see it compressing under load and all the while the chain is jumping sideways. I think I even lost my inner tubes somewhere, theres only a disgusting puddle of who-knows-what inside my tyres left.
Since a while ago, even my seatpost can't be relied upon anymore. How did it come this far? That's why I return to A all the time, bike needs to get fixed apparently.

@redbaronmulisha Frankfurt, Germany. You get the beer, I'll show you the trails.
  • 10 2
 I'm shocked at the leap in suspension technology.
  • 10 2
 They really are pushing that RZR edge.
  • 9 3
 You just had to put a damper on things...
  • 10 2
 I don't think we're going to see eye to eye...
  • 8 1
 they compressed the information too much, some of the juicy bits got dissipated
  • 11 2
 These comments are not progressing in a linear fashion, I fear they may ramp up at the end.
  • 11 2
 These puns are not FIT4 Pinkbike
  • 5 1
 My financial status will never rebound when this hits the markets
  • 5 1
 This might be the point where the community forks into different camps. Some will continue to live under a rock (shocking, really). Some will come out of their foxholes and accept new developments. Early adopters will be electrified by the announcement, like they always are.

Me personally? Occam's razor suggests that the simple answer is most probably the right one. But who knows what he would have said, if he had one of those electric shavers for a more consistent and smooth result.
  • 7 0
 This will be huge when it's released for long 6-7" travel trail bikes. Sign me up
  • 5 0
 Yeah, it shouldn't be too difficult to sense the pedal-bob motion and close the compression circuit to counteract it. It'll be more difficult however to separate that movement from compression forces from a bumpy trail without also integrating some-kind of pedal-meter that tells the system when you're pedalling and when you're not.
  • 1 1
 @cwatt: yes. cant wait for that. it will be game changer in several ways. first the shock will cost 1000 minimum at first they will add ''only'' live LSC , and then slowly adding more live features like low and high rebound.
  • 1 1
 @trauty: do i want a bitchin new shock or an iphone? lol
  • 3 0
 @cwatt: If you measure the acceleration/movement of the suspendet part of the bike this is indeed a problem. However, if you move the sensors to the un-sprung part of the bike i.e. the fork lowers you have only movement acceleration from the terrain input not from the rider pedalling or shifting weight!
  • 1 0
 @Raptor-30:
Like the brain system
  • 2 0
 @cwatt: Di2 integration with your Garmin head unit, plus speed and cadence sensors should make that feasible. As long as Live Valve has some sort of integration.
  • 7 2
 Eh, my DW link bikes pedals great wide open, and with a platform switch for the fire roads I dont' see much of a need for this
  • 3 0
 But you will be able to get an app so you can configure it with your phone then you can download the data and share on Strava, if you are not too tired after all that you might be able to get a ride in that is if your shock is done downloading the latest software patch. Time will tell if its worth having.
  • 1 0
 @lake-st: I don't see this technology dying, and given the cycling community's willingness to splurge on the new and the shiny I suspect this kind of thing will be pretty standard in ten years or less, for better or worse.
  • 4 0
 Someone needs to teach Dentists how to actually ride their bikes. That way someone outside full factory pros can actually afford to have and use the bikes that will come out over the next decade.
  • 4 0
 sooo let's start the tech discussions...

an electronically-adjustable low-speed orifice?

edit: and the 2nd piston entering a tapered cone for the bottom out
  • 10 8
 Fuck anything involving a battery on a human powered bicycle. Defeats the purpose of a simplistic machine and the sport in general. I would rather switch to dirtbikes before putting something with a battery on a mountain bike.
  • 3 2
 ... k
  • 6 1
 So you would rather buy and use an internal combustion engine which chews on gasoline to produce something like 15-20% usable power output and 80-85% heat, noise and toxic waste than using a very small battery for powering your suspension or shifting. A battery so small, you can charge it with a pocket-sized solar-powered battery charger on any of your sunny pauses on a nice ride (or during, of after a ride...) - so you effectively never need a wall plug at home.

So even if you want the most high-tech mountainbike s#!t to ride on, you can stay completely off the grid.

Yeah.. get your dirt bike, which you need to refuel every couple of miles. And make frequent oil changes, throwing away volumes of oil every single time which would last for half a lifetime of mtb-chain lubing and suspension rebuild. Great way of thinking.
  • 1 0
 @theobviousfaker: ever ridden an enduro bike? They usually last more than a couple miles on a tank... Also the chain lube is cheap aerosol stuff. Finally, an oil change for a top end dirtbike is something like 40 hours? A FULL SERVICE for a fox 40 is 12.
  • 2 1
 @YouHadMeAtDrugs: Uh, my enduro bike actually lasts forever and I can't seem to find a tank anywhere.

I lube my chain by dripping oil onto it, which is less wasteful. I bought a litre of biodegradable oil 6-7 years ago and still have half of it left.

My Fox 36 needs a service every 100-200 hours (or annually) and takes what, 150ml of oil each time?
My engine actually runs on mostly sunflower or olive oil, lots of solid fat and additional carbohydrates. I change it every day after my breakfast coffee, but at least its completely biodegradable and not even harmful to the environment, new or used.

But even if you run the Fox 40, 12 hours of actual dh-riding is more than it sounds like. How many runs down is that? A day-long enduro ride for me, including the transfer from city to mountain and all the uphill-riding is like 3-4 hours of ACTUAL RIDING time, and most of it is flat or forestry roads uphill. Singletrail amounts to minutes, I need something like 10-15 minutes for a 1500" descent.
  • 1 0
 On the one hand I get your point, but really all it's doing is what you can do with the knobs and levers already on your suspension, only a whole lot more frequently and more precisely and accurately than you can. I am among those who would typically balk at adding electricity to a bicycle, but this is the sort of thing that would compel me to do so.
  • 4 2
 How exactly does LiveValve translate from the buggy (if that is the correct term for the Polaris thing?) to a mountainbike, without adding sensors to our brakes, crank and saddle? To have something similar to what is shown in the Polaris video, you would have to measure directly whether the mtb-rider is braking, how hard, whether he is pedaling and even whether he is sitting down or not.
Without all these connected sensors, it doesn't really translate, does it? If the shock and fork are trying to figure that out all themselves, isolated from the rest of the bike, it is just guessing. I don't want to say that you cannot improve that way, but its just not the same to the all-connected-Polaris where the system actually knows exactly about the inputs.
Using the same "LiveValve" label for both systems therefore stinks like unfair marketing. Sorry Fox, I'm a hardcore fanboi of yours, but in this case you'll have to explain in more detail.
  • 3 0
 Thats all Polaris could come up with to thwart the CanAm takeover.. Had this shit on my volvo since 2004. yawn. Dickie, youre reaching for content..
  • 4 0
 e-suss will work great on my e-bike Smile
  • 2 2
 Pretty cool for that offroad vehical. This might be good for the World Cup Elite types that actually use this sort of technology, but for the general public - why bother? Seems like an example of over-engineering and another excuse for bike companies to tack on another grand or two for a new bike.
  • 4 1
 No lazers?
Whats an electronic wonder gizmo doing with out lazers?
And it must have a cool beeep when you turn it on.
  • 2 0
 I'm wondering when we'll get Ferro-fluid bike suspension? I know it would be crazy expensive, but our bikes are already crazy expensive right?
  • 4 0
 sounds spendy
  • 3 0
 Nice ABS cone like my Avalanche Cartridge for Bottom out..
  • 2 0
 yup its old news. many companies been doing it for years
  • 3 0
 you see that progressive coil......maybe that also belongs on bikes......
  • 1 1
 its not a progressive coil, though it is two different coils. small one for sag/ride height, the second large coil is your actual spring that's compressing under load.
  • 4 0
 @peterguns:
Wich results in a more progressive behaviour
  • 1 0
 @peterguns: having two coils makes it progressive, unless they are the same spring rate. In which case they would just run one longer coil.
  • 1 0
 Actually the spring curve depends on where the cross-over ring is compared to the travel. So no, just because it has a two coils does NOT make it progressive. Initially the spring rate is soft because both springs are compressing together. When the springs compress far enough, the cross-over slides up until it hits the stop ring and is prevented from sliding further. At this point, the crossover effectively becomes the upper spring seat, locking out the upper spring. From this point, remaining spring travel occurs at the rate of the lower, main spring alone.
  • 1 0
 @peterguns:
it is progressive and thats what you are saying. BUT it's not progressive like an air shock. The spring rate curve has bends. If you calculate the average spring rate from all different coils you get the beginning rate. If the shocks get compressed more and more the lightest coil will hit it's limit and can't be compressed more. From this moment you can calculate the average spring rate from all coils excpt the one that is compressed because it doesn't move at this point. If you do this through the whole travel you get a spring rate wich is progressive because the average spring rate increases through the travel. You can image that this is also the case with two springs.
  • 1 0
 This is impressive. Way to go fox!
Now, how's the price tag going to look on these bad boys? And what's the cost or annual/semi annual maintenance?
  • 1 0
 The direction of the lower bushing mouning hardware on the Fox Valve prototype seems awkward. Why would you want the flex to risk destroying your bearings over time?
  • 1 0
 Yes. You guys already wrote extensively on this and it will be here shortly.
  • 1 0
 So basically 'Active Suspension' from back in the 90's from F1 that they banned after a couple of years
  • 2 0
 Nah, that was a whole other thing. The Williams active suspension system could create motion, not just react to it. www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AME4v3qZkc
  • 1 0
 so not even as advanced as from back in the 90's then Wink
  • 1 0
 Like a Specialized Brain shock but with electronics? FAIL There's a reason people remove them from their bikes... they suck.
  • 2 0
 Sooo he swore to secrecy then wrote a article about it
  • 1 0
 Fully rigid suspension on takeoffs, plush suspension on landings, yes please.
  • 2 0
 DI2 haters gonna hate!
  • 1 0
 Turbo likes Turunan Bokir. Damn.
  • 2 0
 this shits pimp tight
  • 1 0
 Doesn't lapierre already do this or is this just the fox version?
  • 1 0
 Whats gonna be next, electronic braking, or do we have that already?
  • 1 0
 I wonder how many AA's it takes...
  • 1 1
 Still looks like a reactive system to me.
  • 1 1
 fuckin' e-bikes...







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.046625
Mobile Version of Website