There's certainly no shortage of carbon fiber super-bikes to choose from these days, but it's slim pickings when it comes to high-end full-suspension bikes made out of steel. For those riders who enjoy something a bit different, we have Production Privée's 140mm-travel Shan N°5. Intended to be a do-it-all, bash-around bike, the steel N°5 can be fitted with a fork that has anywhere between 140mm and 160mm of travel, and it also has room for a plus-sized rear tire.
''We wanted the Shan N°5 to be an excellent performer, to be fun, simple, reliable and with maintenance reduced to a strict minimum,'' so says the spiel on Production Privée's website, which is the same brief as their popular Shan hardtail but in a more forgiving package.
Shan N°5 Details• Intended use: enduro / all-mountain / trail
• Rear wheel travel: 140mm
• Fork travel: 150mm
• Wheel size: 27.5''
• Frame material: 4130 steel
• 1X drivetrain only
• BB92 bottom bracket
• Single-pivot design
• 12 x 148mm Boost hub spacing
• Room for 27.5'' x 2.8'' rear tire
• Ant-rust coating
• Weight: 31lb 15oz
• MSRP: €2,915.83 - €4,165.83 (exc. VAT)
•
www.production-privee.com This early Shan test mule has me wishing for an unpainted, clear coated color option. Who's with me?
If you want some steel in your life, a Shan N°5 frame and Fox Float DPS EVOL shock goes for € 1,499.17 to € 1,749.17 (exc. VAT), and complete bikes run between € 2,915.83 - € 4,165.83 (exc. VAT) depending on the build. The bike shown here sports a one-off build, however, and it weighs 31lb 15oz. At 8.37lb for a frame (sans shock), this is one machine that's probably not for those concerned with how much their bike weighs.
Design DetailsProduction Privée is best known for their steel hardtail, a bike that we were big fans of when we reviewed it back in 2012, so it's not a surprise to see their first full-suspension frame also using steel tubing. That being said, it wasn't a 'steel or nothing' sort of decision when Damien Nosella, one of the main minds behind the company's bikes, penned the new N°5.
They were open to using other materials, he said, but, in the end, steel was the go-to choice: ''We decided to go the 4130 CrMo route for the chassis. Since the advent of mechanical sports, CrMo chassis contraptions have been winning car and motorcycle races every weekend,'' Nosella said when the N°5 was first released. ''Steel is a magical material with impeccable strength and very high levels of elasticity and fatigue resistance. When used on a bike, incredibly high levels of tolerance and grip are obtained compared with an alloy or carbon chassis.''
The Shan's alloy dropouts and forward shock mount are both bolted onto the steel frame.
The small diameter steel tubing gives the N°5 a classic, clean look, even with the external cable routing and bolt-on guides. And speaking of bolting things on, the location of the Fox shock means that the only place you'll be bolting a bottle cage on is the underside of the downtube, and most of you know how I feel about that...
The forward shock mount is also bolted onto the frame rather than welded, and two ISCG tabs sit under the BB92 bottom bracket shell that let you attach some sort of taco-style protection if you make a habit out of smashing into things.
There's enough clearance for you to roll through wet cement without it clogging up or, in a more likely scenario, run a 2.8'' tire.
People who want to run a 170mm-stroke dropper post will appreciate the short-ish seattube, and those that like plus-sized meat will be stoked to see that the slim steel seatstay and chainstay tubes leave plenty of room for up to a 2.8'' wide tire. What you won't be able to run, though, is a front derailleur, with the N°5 being a dedicated 1X drivetrain bike. Front derailleurs are silly anyway.
The 'Bahama Yellow' paint job is pretty polarizing, I suspect, and it's actually a homage to Singer, the legendary Californian brand that ''re-imagines'' Porsche's 964-chassis 911 cars into $400,00 USD (and up from there) dream machines.
Nosella and crew at Production Privée are fans of classic cars and auto racing, which explains
their adjustable sweep grips that are modeled after the notable Dunlop CR65 Formula One tire, and that theme can be spotted throughout their catalog. Those who prefer a more subdued look than Bahama Yellow can go with a black frame.
The Shan employs a single pivot design with an aluminum clevis to drive the shock and deliver 140mm of rear wheel travel.
Suspension DesignProduction Privée talks a lot about simplicity and reliability, so it makes sense that they've gone with a relatively straightforward single-pivot layout rather than employ a bunch of links or something novel for the N°5's back end. The design delivers 140mm of rear wheel travel, and the custom tuned Fox Float DPS EVOL metric shock is said to provide a ''low ratio that guarantees the best possible performance: sensitivity at the beginning, perfect rebound performance, and great efficiency throughout its entire suspension travel.'' Hmm, heady claims for sure, but can an uncomplicated single-pivot system deliver on that marketing-speak?
The Fox shock is driven by an aluminum yoke that helps to isolate it from side loads, and Nosella says that while he could have gone with some sort of wildly varying leverage rate that would have sounded impressive on paper, he's designed a linear-progressive setup that he says is about creating a predictable and easy to understand suspension system.
In the name of less maintenance and more riding, the main pivot is sized the same as a Press Fit bottom bracket shell, with alloy cups and angular contact bearings that he said makes it reliable and easy to service.
And why the middle-of-the-road 140mm of travel? ''This travel size was not chosen so as to meet the criteria of a specific category, but purely as a way of extracting the maximum amount of pleasure and performance out of the Shan N°5,'' he said of the hard to pin down number.
Specifications
Specifications
|
Release Date
|
2017 |
|
Price
|
$2915.83 |
|
Travel |
140 |
|
Rear Shock |
Fox Float Factory series 210x55mm |
|
Fork |
Fox Factory series 34, FIT4, 150mm |
|
Cassette |
SRAM Eagle GX 12spd |
|
Crankarms |
SRAM Eagle GX w/ 30t |
|
Bottom Bracket |
SRAM |
|
Rear Derailleur |
SRAM Eagle GX |
|
Chain |
SRAM Eagle GX |
|
Shifter Pods |
SRAM Eagle GX |
|
Handlebar |
Production Privee LGB 780mm |
|
Stem |
Production Privee R2R 50mm |
|
Grips |
Production Privee CR35 |
|
Brakes |
SRAM Guide RS |
|
Wheelset |
Stan's Flow MK3 |
|
Tires |
Maxxis HR2 EXO TR 2.4'' / Minion EXO TR 2.3'' |
|
Seat |
SDG Duster |
|
Seatpost |
Bike Yoke Revive 160mm |
|
2 Questions With Production Privée's Damien NosellaMike Levy: The Shan N°5's 140mm of travel isn't quite long enough to call it an enduro bike, and I'd argue that it's a bit too much for it to be a trail bike. How would you classify the N°5, and where has it been designed to excel?
Damien Nosella: We wanted the Shan Nº5 to be our perfect all-arounder / mountaineer. Either it’s for a lunch ride, a full enduro race weekend, a day in the mountain, or a day at the bike park. More than anything, the Nº5 is designed to give you fun and confidence for day-long rides and that in a simple package.
The non-orthodox travel number is a result of geometry and engineering requirements and not an answer to a "marketing” segment. Again, what we wanted to achieve is a fun but forgiving ride, strong and reliable. That’s why we choose a single pivot design, a low damping ratio, and steel over other materials in order to work on the “mechanical” grip notion with the means at hand for the size of our company. What I mean is that if our main target was to design a race bike, we would have done it differently. Is there a classification for a bike that takes you by the hand and carries you to the next turn and obstacle for hours and hours?
Levy: The Shan N°5 is a lot of fun, but there are many carbon and aluminum bikes on the market that are also fun. Why should a rider choose your steel bike over one made using carbon or aluminum? What does steel offer?
Nosella: Engineering-wise, steel offers remarkable properties in strength, tunable stiffness, fatigue, and resilience. Playing on section sizes, butted lengths, thicknesses, and heat treatment let us work on what we call the “mechanical” grip, a dynamic concept which car and bike racing companies laid on for their GP, MXGP bikes to give that right amount of flex to maximize traction, grip in corners, off-cambers, etc... I can’t speak for the top athletes of our sport, but I believe they will probably need an incisive chassis to hit their lines to the millimeter; at the opposite end, the average rider or the enduro rider needs a forgiving and confidence-giving bike to let him enjoy the ride or racing for hours.
That’s what steel can offer; the right amount of flex and dynamism. And last but not least is the superiority in terms of fatigue resistance that steel offers: a frame made out of steel will keep its dynamic and strength characteristics longer than any aluminum frame without the cost of a carbon frame (a well engineered one, and that’s another big topic).
ClimbingYou don't need a degree in bikeology to know that the boys at Production Privée didn't put ascending at the top of their priority list; this just isn't that kind of machine. But while the steel banana performed as expected in the handling department on tricky climbs - that is, not awesomely - it's surprisingly efficient when you're on the gas. Hefty rubber only adds to the N°5's weight, which is an entirely different battle, but the bike scoots along nicely under power once you're past walking speed, and it does so without the need to reach down for the Fox shock's swindle switch. You might expect that from a 140mm-travel bike, but I'd argue that this particularly rowdy example could be excused for feeling a bit squishy and slow when the rider is on the gas. Even so, there's no justification needed here.
When it comes to scrabbling up a technical pitch, it's decidedly less rosy. Or maybe I should say that the Shan performs about how you'd expect a chunky steel bike with big meat and angles designed to excel in the opposite direction. Does the bike get a free pass, then? I'm not sure, to be honest. With patience and precision, you can get the Shan up all sorts of nastiness, but it's also not exactly going to be doing you any favors and helping you along in those moments.
The yellow bike is efficient, sure, but it makes no apologies for not being a KOM hunter. This just isn't that type of bike.
 | The Shan's heft and angles keep it from matching lighter weight, sharping handling competition, but I suspect that the guys at Production Privée are well aware of that and don't really give a damn. If your attitude towards climbing matches theirs, you'll get along just fine with the N°5. If you feel more invested in your ascents, however, this bike probably isn't suited to your needs. |
It's probably not fair to compare this rig to other 140mm-travel bikes, such as the carbon fiber Devinci Troy, as the large majority of those are surely more trail oriented; instead, think of the Shan as a short-travel enduro bike and get on with your climb.
The key to success is to keep your weight low and forward to fight the bike's front-end length, have an attentive approach to steering, and be aware of where your pedals are at the ends of the regrettably long 175mm cranks to keep them from striking the ground. Do all that while having a no-f*cks-given attitude about climbing, and you'll get on just fine with the N°5.
The Shan's heft and angles keep it from matching lighter weight, sharping handling competition, but I suspect that the guys at Production Privée are well aware of that and don't really give a damn. If your attitude towards climbing matches theirs, you'll get along just fine with the N°5. If you feel more invested in your ascents, however, this bike probably isn't suited to your needs.
DescendingEvery mountain bike is a rolling compromise; it's really a matter of what you want to give up in order to gain in other areas. But when it comes to the N°5, thoughts of what you gave up on the climb will be forgotten soon after you drop into the descent. That's especially true if said descent is full of corners; tight and slow or fast and wide open, this is a bike that doesn't care, and it's the N°5's defining quality. The last rig we had in that cornered as well as the Shan was Devinci's much longer-travel Spartan, and the fact that the yellow bike equals that beast - but with less travel - is really something.
But unlike the Spartan, the N°5 can perform in more than just fast, rough terrain, with it slicing and dicing all shapes of corners and at all speeds. You can come in too fast, chop your way through, and the Shan will spring out of the corner as if it's late for a first date. But the traction, holy mother of grip, does it deliver traction, and that lets it carry immense speed through the kind of fast, low-purchase corners that might usually upset a bike of this travel.
Predictability is the key, really, as there are relatively few oh-shit moments on the N°5 that would call for a dropped foot or even big steering corrections. Production Privée might have something special here with these numbers and this frame material.
Nailing a corner is pretty high on the list of things that feel good, and it's a common occurrence on the Shan.
Steel has a rep as a forgiving material, much more so than aluminum or carbon, but I'd also argue that it really comes down to how that material is used. Production Privée says that it's the best choice for the N°5 because it has ''the right amount of flex and dynamism,'' and while I'm not convinced that's the primary reason for the bike's traction and otherworldly cornering abilities, I'm also not going to rule it out. It's simple, single-pivot suspension design also delivers loads of grip through an immensely sensitive setup that responds to the ground regardless of where the shock is in its stroke. Yes, the N°5 could use a bit more end-stroke ramp-up (a volume spacer would do the job), but the eager travel is surely one of the causes of the near-never-ending ability of the rear-end to hold onto the ground.
I would usually associate less travel with more playfulness, but that's not that case with the Shan. Yes, it can out-corner pretty much everything on the market, but I suspect that its weight keeps it from being the hooligan that I thought it would be. That said, its predictability inspires a load of confidence that can get you in trouble, but it's also just enough bike to get you out of said trouble... most of the time.
If you're more into sessioning jumps and corners than racing the clock or all-day death marches, the Shan might be a good match for you.
Okay, time for some comparisons because that's what we do at this point, even though the N°5 is a hard bike to pin down. Most recently, it was Rocky Mountain's Instinct Carbon 90 BC Edition, a bike with 155mm of travel, similar intentions, but more all-around capability than the Shan. That Rocky weighs less, has more travel, climbs better and, to be straightforward, would be my choice over the Shan if I needed a forgiving bike for long rides. But it in no way can rival the Shan in the corners, that much is for sure, and there's a certain unexplainable allure to the steel frame tubes that's hard to explain.
Okay, what about Devinci's Troy? Same travel numbers front and back, and same intentions, but the Troy is also lighter and more all-around capable. Again, I'd choose the Troy before the Shan, but I'll admit to caring just as much about the climb as the descent that it leads you to.
 | Predictability is the key, really, as there are relatively few oh-shit moments on the N°5 that would call for a dropped foot or even big steering corrections. Production Privée might have something special here with these numbers and this frame material. |
While not quite as much of a hooligan as it looks like it would be, the Shan is still a fun bike to be a goon aboard.
I'm conflicted. A full-blown enduro bike with another 20mm of cush is going to be faster for most riders when things get scary hairy, and a lighter and faster rolling machine will cover more ground when some horsepower is required, both being facts that leave me asking why and where the N°5 makes the most sense. But maybe it doesn't matter if the bike is fun as hell to ride, and the yellow Shan is exactly that and then some - it's forgiving, changes direction obscenely well, and it puts a smile on your face even though there are more pragmatic ways to spend this kind of money. Maybe mountain biking doesn't need to be a well-thought-out, practical exercise?
Technical Details• Tire Clearance: The slim, steel seatstay and chainstays provide enough clearance to ride the N°5 through wet cement without it clogging up, and also enough room to run a 2.8'' wide rear tire if you want to add even more weight and go even slower up the climbs. Stick to regular size meat to get the most out of the Shan, though.
With 160mm of stroke, the BikeYoke Revive dropper post is an interesting spec choice that performed well.
• BikeYoke Revive Dropper: RC had good things to say about the BikeYoke Revive dropper that
he reviewed not too long ago, and that's mostly the case here as well. Rather than employ a closed design, the post mixes air and oil in a twin-tube setup, but if the bike is upside down, that air can go where it's not supposed to and the post will feel a bit squishy. This is inherent in the design, and it's why BikeYoke incorporated the 'Revive Valve' at the top of the post. The valve works as advertised, and the dropper was back to 100-percent in seconds.
• Stealth Shan: I want to bitch about the sole bottle location on the underside of the downtube, or the 175mm cranks that don't play nice with the bike's relatively low bottom bracket, but I suspect that many riders won't care too much about those points. One thing that I can't moan about, though, is the noise - this thing is quieter than a thirteen-year-old Mike Levy at a parent-teacher meeting.
Pinkbike's Take | It's difficult for me to not try and slot the N°5 into some sort of classification, but I think that avoiding that really is the key to understanding Production Privée's first full-suspension bike. Sure, it could be an enduro machine or a park bike, or even a burly trail bike, but more than anything it's an example of a small bike company doing something different. That in itself is going to appeal to some riders, and it also doesn't hurt that the bike is a hell of a lot of fun to ride.— Mike Levy |
About the Reviewer Stats: Age: 37 • Height: 5'10” • Inseam: 33" • Weight: 165lb • Industry affiliations / sponsors: None • Instagram:
killed_by_death Mike Levy spent most of the 90s and early 2000s racing downhill bikes and building ill-considered jumps in the woods of British Columbia before realizing that bikes could also be pedaled for hours on end to get to some pretty cool places. These days he spends most of his time doing exactly that, preferring to ride test bikes way out in the local hills rather than any bike park. Over ten years as a professional mechanic before making the move to Pinkbike means that his enthusiasm for two wheels extends beyond simply riding on them, and his appreciation for all things technical is an attribute that meshes nicely with his role of Technical Editor at Pinkbike.
some other had the balls to call their bike super enduro, after all XD
Cotic Rocket and Flair
Starling bikes
BTR Pinner
PP Shan n5
DMR Bolt Long
...
ICB2.0 (yeah, open source means he can build the Alutech bike too)
Der Flotte Karl
@phutphutend: I have no doubt the Starling is pretty amazing. Still waiting for Dirt magazine to finish that 29" group test. But it really depends on what you're after. I think Starling is light, efficient and stable. The ICB2.0 is designed (being a crowd designed bike) to be agile and fun at "average customer speed" and may not cut it on really testing enduro terrain. The DMR can't be beat for the price and the kind of simple fun you can have on it (without needing to go really fast or smooth). There is something to say for each of these bikes. So yeah, there is may be no need for a test to see which is best, but it is always good to give those bikes some exposure and show what they're for and how they relate. But as Cy Cotic already mentioned elsewhere, it is a bit limiting to focus on just one frame material.
The issue is the design specification. Big bike companies start off with; "Make bikes X% stiffer than 2017 bike". This gives them a good metric for marketing. This is incrrect for a dynamic vehicle that rides rough terrain and leans to go round corners!
Sadly that bike got stolen and another Shan wasn't an option (sold out at the time). I would, however, have another one in a heartbeat, and wouldn't feel bad about the PF BB.
'single-use', much like the sram power links. If you're careful taking them out, you can easily re-fit them.
wheelsmfg.com/bottom-brackets/bb86-92/bb86-92-bottom-brackets.html
Or so the majority of articles of unbuyable bikes will have you believe!
I'm into the 'Made in XXX' stuff like Starling bikes etc but would love to see a far eastern 4130 cromo single pivot with a fixed dropout and simple shock mount so just a tubed frame - Modern geometry and sensible tube profiles would mean it isn't stupidly heavy (the starling isn't after all) and it could be crazy cheap realistically if sales numbers were there.
I mean from a manufacturing standpoint if we can get decent steel frames for £300 from the far east we should be able to get a full sus frame below £700 inc shock, would be cool to see and would certainly go against the standard £1500+ for a frame now.
Stanton are due to release theirs altho given the price of their HTs their FS is going to be well over a grand (£).
I am suggesting that it would be good to see an ultra-simple, steel, single pivot frame with modern geometry at an awesome price-point, something people could ride the wheels off on a comparable budget - it wouldnt be the lightest / fastest up-hill but with the right kinematics and geo could be very good at the other stuff, which is what most people care about - Again the starling for example.
People that 'dont care about MTB' would never go into business making such a frame, especially with the goal to supply it at a low price-point - Surely that is caring more about MTB than anything? - Making a sustainable, low-price performance item from a material that lasts.
@fartymarty - The Stanton will be huge money im sure, its got a lot of fancy machined bits and a complicated suspension system .
I'm about to step into this arena - buying myself a Stanton soon. At £700 for a bare hardtail frame it's not exactly a bargain. But you can't make everything about budget, particularly with artisan products like these.
As for this - I think I'd probably give up my left bollock for one. LOVE it.
The welds are flawless, the paint is good quality, they're all Reynolds tubing (631/853 front and 525 rear end) with nice details like the yoke.
I think of the the main reasons to move from steel in the 90s was cutting production costs.
Back to the original question, the DMR Bolt (Long) probably fits the bill. Though I've heard the frame works better with the X Fusion Vector shock so that adds to the price. If we forget about frame material for a second, the Focus Vice may be what you're after. Olly Wilkins likes it too
@mikelevy, telling it like it is.
Also The new soul looks mint!
"The Cotic Rocket is the best trail bike I’ve ever ridden. In fact, it’s so good, I just bought one! With actual money!"
To be honest it has been so long ago that I've ridden an aluminium hardtail (2005 or 2006 or so) that I can't compare how harsh it would be. And I rarely sit down anyway. What I do think is that I find it easier to explore the limits of my grip on a steel hardtail. You get feedback so you know how much further you can push it. Whereas with an aluminium hardtail it keeps tracking and then suddenly goes so that makes it a bit more scary to find that edge. But I'm no real bike tester, I can't comment whether there are exceptions. I do know that most current aluminium frames are made from 7000, 6000 or occasionally 5000 series aluminium. A friend of mine used to ride a aluminium frame by Miyata made from 2000 series aluminium. This may not be as strong, but it is more fatigue resistant so they could allow for more flex (due to smaller diameter tubing) than with the stronger alloys. In aircraft, the tensile/fatigue loaded skin panels typically are made from Al2025T3 (upper fuselage, lower wing) and the bits loaded by compression (lower fuselage, upper wing) made from Al7075T6. So yeah, if they'd allow a 7000 series aluminium frame to flex (due to small diameter tubing) that much it may be strong enough but it will eventually fail due to fatigue. 2000 series could work (though you'll need lugged joints as you can't weld it) and it could give comfort comparable to steel and titanium, but it seems like the industry forgot about it.
So yeah, I got an steel Voodoo Erzulie back in 2006 but unfortunately wrecked it in a crash and replaced it with a DMR Switchback in 2008. I'm still riding that one but I'm working out the details with BTR on a new BTR Ranger hardtail. Basically the large 26" frame but with a 400mm seat tube and a lower top tube. I love low top tubes and I'm going to love that frame
If only I was as rich as all the commenters will assume... ;-)
I hope you enjoy it!
Totally, steel is feel!
Hope you enjoy the BTR, sounds like you've earned it.
www.cotic.co.uk/geek/page/SteelFullSuspension
I'm surprised to see aluminium to be undermarketed in NA too. In Europe at least brands like Orange, Nicolai and Liteville are getting enough respect even though their frames are (almost) exclusively aluminium. What about titanium. Are Merlin and Litespeed still well respected? We have a local brand called 11ants over here that does titanium frames with Pinion or Rohloff gearing. They also have a full suspension frame of which Nicolai makes the aluminium rear end. They're doing well, I've heard. I wasn't too excited about the geometry of their frames (though they do custom geometry) and more importantly I decided Rohloff and Pinion aren't for me. I realized I don't pedal enough to warrant an expensive drivetrain
I have never looked too much into what Trek does, but Specialized doesn't shy from using steel. I've got their steel P1 dirtjumper (with offset 24" rear wheel, 26" in the front in true Specialized fashion). Things may have changed in the mean time, haven't looked into it. But really, what is it that makes carbon so popular when we know that it is too easy to mess things up and not see it from the outside?
I used to have an aluminum frame with bb86, and that had a couple early failures, but it was never noisy.
The only thing I think is stupid is that EVO system with all the damn adaptors, and PF30 in an aluminum frame tends to be noisy, but once again install them with a dab of medium thread locker and they'll usually stay quite.
So a $100-150 BB adapter is the solution to a problem that shouldn't exist?
Sweet. You got a good deal on one.
Square taper bottom brackets work well if the crank arms stay tight, they're just heavy.
I haven't had to replace any of my threadded bottom brackets for any reason on the last 3 bikes I've bought.
You just can't brag that you've created a super reliable bike that's easy to maintain and then throw one of the worst bottom bracket setups on it that requires an aftermerket bottom bracket adapter to "fix". That's not ok to me.
It's just weird that with carbon mtb frames this is almost never a topic? Carbon would be the perfect material to fine tune flex. With road bikes this is a big thing, bring it to the mountain as well! Takes more know-how though to determine where it helps and where it hurts (and how to build it into the frame) and a more differentiated marketing approach. Might be asking too much...
Shame i really wanted one of these..
On the other hand, using frame flex to find grip in corners is a big thing in the motorcycle racing world.
Press fit BB on a steel bike...
There is no excuse to use a tap accurately on a material that threads nicely. Considering how long it took to make that frame. It’s not much of a step or cost to do so...
The Five seems to be setup quite similarly (correct if wrong) but is said to be poppy and lively?
also i cannot understand a comparison with a rocky or devinci... the frames/bikes cost double of the shan... sure these bikes have to be better in some points!
And thats considerd heavy?
Yes a raw version would be sweet!
I'm confused by the forced motorsport connections with The Stig and Gulf, and now Singer (or whoever)
And then of course "Slap me hard" ....?
Why can't it just be a bike? Without the BS
If I were entering the realm of steel full sussers, it would have to be a CURTIS! End of.
But that above looks reeet tastyified
regarding the bike, i was very interested in the cotic rocket max (140mm 29er, reynolds front triangle, 4130 seatstays, aluminum chainstays). the geometry was not exactly to my liking - high stack (the large has a 120mm headtube and external lower cups), short reach and long chainstays (the large has slightly shorter reach than chainstays, while my large honzo has 4.5cm longer reach than chainstays). but other features were intriguing: threaded bb, internal and external dropper cable routing, bottle cage mount, relatively attractive pricing, uk product. i even ordered one in spring when they had the free cc db inline upgrade, only to find out that they were out of stock. i went with a transition smuggler instead. it has very similar geometry to the honzo, zero stack headset, but shorter travel than the cotic. but coming from a hardtail, i don't really mind the shorter travel.
sorry for the lengthy elaboration...
I also have a steel framed bike i use for commuting which uses threaded BB, and is easy when i need to change. same manufacturer BB and i have gone though 2 in 2 years, so the threaded is better. But when you think about full suss frames, it is good practice to replace the bearings every year (dependent on use and condition) so you will still be hitting bearings out of the frame an back in again? why is the BB any different?
the same is true for Headsets, although i always have a gutwrenching Feeling when i press in Headset Cups and they get a bit out of line during the process. luckily the Frame manufacturers build that area strong enough for inept Hobby mechanics like myself
however if i can avoid this, i prefer a different solution. also because i believe that the pressing process increases material fatigue - on both the Frame and the bearings.
i hear you regarding the commuter - mine is eating bottom brackets for breakfast as well. i believe the mix of chainoil, dirt, dust, grime, and lower maintainance compared to my mtbs is a killer Combo...
Steel cracks, I broke a 531 frame once and on a recent weekend away the 2nd days riding was halted when the only person on a steel bike cracked their frame. Back 20 years ago we all rode steel - I struggle to see the love. Is it the novelty of thin tubes now everyone's use to seeing fat aluminium and Carbon?
aluminum is for hoonin fun
aluminum: a monsoon of fun
alu is value
al is my pal
I guarantee that all of these will catch on.
Tbh, when it's hidden behind inches of travel I just don't buy that there's a meaningful 'ride quality' difference. Even for rigid/road frames, it's more about the geo, construction, tube butting, etc than the material itself. A lot of moder Al road bikes ride beautifully.
What size is 31 pounds, the medium?
So it is like 33 pounds for the large and 35 for xl.
It still sounds a little optimistic...
For a steel bike, they need to use different wall thickness tubing for different sizes.
Otherwise the small is a rock and the xl is a noodle.
Carbon manufacturers actively engineer flexibility into frames to allow some compliance - I think a bit of movement is welcome in the swingarm, so long as it isn't a noodle when pedalling.