The eight Wild Card athletes that will head to Red Bull Rampage in October
were announced last week. For the athletes not pre-qualified or on the among the Wild Cards, the Marzocchi Proving Grounds presented by Five Ten event is the only chance they have at making the cut. I caught up with Red Bull Rampage organizer Todd Barber to see how the Wild Cards were chosen, why he decided to add a qualifier event this year and what its format will be.
How many applicants do you get to Red Bull Rampage every year?
This year we received 30 interested athletes.
How do you decide who gets the Wild Card entries?
Wild card invites are chosen by the Rampage Committee which consists of Cam McCaul, Aaron Chase, Randy Spangler, Nico Vink, Dave Smutok and myself. Riders are selected based on past Rampage results, results from similar big bike contests, proven skill on a big mountain bike, and current video segments.
It's not an exact science. The high production value pieces are nice, but I've never required anyone to make a Rampage video.
I think we're all very unbiased and that's the reason we've put together this panel of people. I feel like they're all on there for the right reasons and none of them are team managers. I try to find all the guys that will stay as neutral as possible and either competed or understand what it takes to compete at the event.
Long story short, it's not an exact science. It's more of a ‘who is peaking in the sport,' 'what they're doing', and 'do they have the skills to come compete safely and possibly win the event?’
Are there any kind of red flags for you when you're looking at people that would suggest that they're not ready?
Yeah, there are certainly people that are crashing hard a lot. Adolf last year would be a prime example of somebody that was a bit on the border. Raw young talent, but also goes big. It made us all a little bit nervous but we all felt like he had truly amazing bike skills.
We each make a decision and we all vote once. Then I collect all of those and I tabulate them. Then we get on the phone the next day and we have a two and a half hour conference call. Then we vote again. Then those are the final athletes that are chosen!
I think it's worked pretty well so far. I think there's been some controversy, but that's more on a personal level than on a sport or a big-picture level. There are people that get frustrated because they didn't get in, their friend didn't get in, or they're a Team Manager and their athlete didn't get in. But I would say in the grand scheme we think 'these eight guys, are these the eight that should be there?'
Why did you decide to add a qualifier event to the Rampage selection process for 2019?
This is something that we have been trying to pull together for the past four years and it is finally coming to fruition this year. We decided this was necessary after the sport matured to the point when we had way more ripping athletes that could ride Rampage than we had room to invite.
The other big reason is the hope to develop the sport further. Most sports have year-round opportunities for athletes to build to the pinnacle of their sport. We have Slopestyle events, but no way for the big bike athletes to earn name and prove they deserve a shot to compete at Rampage. Years ago the Rampage was part of the FMB World Tour, and while it was not a good fit trying to make pure slope / dirt jump guys compete at the event, it did introduce new highly skilled athletes to the arena. Many people do not know that is how Brett Rheeder got his start at Rampage six years ago. Proving Grounds will finally be a place for these guys and girls to come build the sport and prove they belong at the Superbowl of Freeride.
Why do you think it's such an important part of the puzzle?
I've always been like, we need a better way to do it than just who's the hot guy and who's got the hot video. We've just felt like there's just a missing piece of the segment. There's Dirt Jump all the way up to Crankworx. That's kind of a linear amount of events going on all across the world. There's this massive gap where Rampage is. So the thought behind it is really a gap to fill and to really help the sport.
Freeride is a lot about just being out riding your bike, filming, and doing what most of these athletes do 98% of the year. It's more about going big. The Fest Series is kind of like that but it's just such a loose thing. There's no real judges and it's a tight-knit crew that do that. So this is to fill the void and help develop the sport and encourage guys out there and girls out there to shred, come out and compete in this, and see if they can get into Rampage.
This year we've got Casey Brown. The name Proving Grounds came from that
interview in Outside Magazine last year. They did a whole article on Casey and they asked me, can she get into Rampage? It wasn't that she was male or female, it was that she just hadn't proved it yet. You have to be the top eight or top eleven to make it to Rampage and I don't feel like she's proven that she is that yet. She could be. Now with Proving Grounds you can prove yourself on the big bike.
So what do you think her chances of qualifying are at this point?
I have no idea, I really don't. I know she's ripping these days. I've been communicating with her just trying to make sure she understands what we're doing and how we're doing it, and she's totally down. She said she's been training, riding and focused on doing good at it. She is definitely one of the inspirations for hosting this event. We needed a place for males and females to come and prove themselves. It definitely sparked the whole interest in doing it. I'm really excited to see how she does and crack that door to see what's possible for the future.
I have had a lot of questions on how a girl can compete fairly against the boys. We feel that is the uniqueness of Rampage more than any other elite sport in the world. At both Proving Grounds and Rampage it is up to the athlete to choose their own path down the mountain. At this years Proving Ground there will be 3 to 4 options at all times to choose their ultimate path down the mountain. There will be massive flat drops, berm presses, step up, downs and overs and even a 60’ canyon gap that mimic Rampage type features.
With that said, a female could come in and say 'hey, this is the line I'm going to ride or build’ and there is no pressure to do what others athletes are doing. Then everyone will be judged with the same criteria. Maybe she'll beat some of the guys with her line choice it will be up to her ride to her abilities and see how the judges see it. If she does well and the format works, then maybe there are a couple other girls that can come out to compete next year.
What is the format for the Proving Grounds contest?
As far as a competition, it will be judged the same as Rampage and we will have 4 of the judges - Spangler, Bender, KJ and Nico. As far as the course it will be a totally custom brand new course built to mimic Rampage type features. As mentioned, there will be 3 to 4 options at all times to allow the athletes to ride to their strengths and style.
What terrain are they riding?
Yeah, that's another side of this uniqueness of this event. On the opposite side of the valley from where the Black Sage course comes down we're creating an entirely new course. 500 plus feet of vertical on about 1700 linear feet of length. If you were to look at it, you'd be like 'how do you do a Rampage course there?' There aren't any steep chutes, rocks or terrain. But the idea is to build features that mimic Rampage type features with big flat drops, doubles, shark fins, step up - down overs, berms and rhythm sections. Basically a course that will test the athletes not just on their tricks but their ability to ride a big bike in bike terrain. Athletes are definitely going to need to know how to rip a berm and carry speed into the features.
Then we're going to build three to four separate lines that are going to intersect each other at different points. If you go right, there'll be a big hit into a big double. If you go straight there'll be a big flat drop. If you go left it'll be a big berm into a double step down, step over. Basically, the athlete has one of three to four ways they can go and within that, they can really crisscross, jump from the backside of a berm onto a berm.
So that's where we get the Rampage creativity and how they want to interpret the mountain and terrain.
A couple features on the Proving Grounds course. KJ photos.
The Marzocchi Proving Grounds event will take place September 7-8th in Bend, Oregon. KJ photos.
To come up with the course, we have been looking at the videos from the past four years and just seeing all the key, marquee features and trying to recreate those in a safe environment. We're not necessarily looking for an athlete to come out of this and win Rampage. That would be amazing if they did, but this is really just cracking the door, allowing more riders into the sport. If they qualify, they're going to have to learn how to dig, they're going to have to learn how to ride, they're going to have to get their build crew together. They're going to have to figure it all out. But what better way to do it than to actually go do it.
If we get two or three people that haven't been to Rampage every year that come out of this, that are now in the system to learn how to build and learn the etiquette and get into it, then maybe in two, three, four years they win it. At the current pace, there's really no other fair way to get into it.
Ale di Lullo photo
So it's basically a feeder? A way to help build Red Bull Rampage?
It is. Like is said, there's such a gap between the slopestyle world and then there's this island of Rampage that is just all by itself. I think that's cool in a lot of ways and the uniqueness of it. But I think the sport's matured now to a point where there needs to be more options to get into it. I'm excited to see where this goes.
I'm putting everything on the line to try and produce this event. I've been calling in every favor and every partner I know. Every sponsor, all my builders, my friends, and everybody to try to throw whatever they can in to make this the coolest most bad ass event. Kyle Jameson, Carson Storch, Cam McCaul and Arron Lutze from Red Bull have been a massive help and the reason this event is ultimately happening in Oregon. The bonus of this weekend is that Black Sage and the Fest Series will be happening on Saturday the 7th and Proving Grounds will be on Sunday the 8th. Should be an action packed weekend.
You said the alternate athletes would be taken from the Proving Grounds event as well, could you explain a little bit about how that would work?
In the past, we've had the wild cards that were chosen and then we always chose 5 alternates in case anybody got hurt or for whatever reason couldn't make it. Like when Remy couldn't get across the border a couple years ago.
But we can't really do that fairly if people are planning to come to Proving Grounds this year. So it couldn't be 'pick the eight wild cards and have two alternates from that when people are spending money and their time and energy into coming all the way out to Proving Grounds. I felt like it's all got to come out of Proving Grounds. If you're committed to coming to Rampage and you didn't get voted in, then you're going to have to come out and prove it. Then we'll take two alternates out of this, so the top three will get in then we'll take two more as alternates.
What excites you the most about this new event?
The dream at Rampage has always been to create a festival type weekend, unfortunately the town of Virgin is not the right place to host this type of event. There is way too much of a tightrope we walk there
every year with the land, the town, the dust, and the crowds.
So we are bringing the festival here, we will have 2 days of events with Black Sage and Proving Grounds as well as camping Friday and Saturday night. We've got 10 Barrel beer flowing all weekend, food trucks, expo and we're going to show Anthills “Return to Earth” on Friday night and music on Saturday night.
Proving Grounds is on private property and people can come out for the whole weekend. Purchase tickets online then show up Friday at 1pm with your tent, Sprinter, RV and just hang out, watch movies, listen to music, drink beer then get up in the morning each day and and watch the worlds best mountain bikers throw down. We are really hoping people will come out and enjoy the whole weekend. This will be the first ever big bike mountain bike festival. Hope to see everyone there.
Key Dates:● September 7-8th - Marzocchi Proving Grounds - Bend, OR
● September 8th - Final Three Rampage Qualifiers Announced
● October 25th - Red Bull Rampage - Virgin, UT
Learn more:● More information on the H5 Events website
here.
● Follow the Marzocchi Proving Grounds presented by Five Ten on
Facebook and
Instagram ● Purchase tickets for Proving Grounds / Black Sage Fest
here.
Todd Barber and the Proving Grounds crew are hosting a Pinkbike special until Sunday the 25th - use the code PGCWX19 to unlock a code for $10 off 2-day passes and $25 off camping. Plus be entered into a drawing to win a GoPro Hero 7 camera package that will be given away on the 25th.Thank you to all of our partners ≈ Marzocchi, Five Ten, GoPro, BF Goodrich, RaceFace, Magura, Red Bull, Clif Bar, Fast House, Alpine Bike Parks, 10 Barrel Brewing, Camelbak, Smartwool, PinkBike and Peterson Cat
Badass athletes, but not my cup o tea spectator-wise
That's what worries me about Rampage. I use the alegory of "street vs park" for BMX. Street riding is still very much fresh and new, with seemingly endless amounts of options and creative originality.
Park, on the other hand, is summarized in a simple question: has every trick that can be done, been done? When I see Rogatkin doing his twirly whirly stuff, I can't help but think that its just a matter of building on the last trick. 360 to 540, 540 to 720, 720 to 900. I'm not sure that what's Rampage should be. Who can do the most flips on a 100' gap? Who can shape lines into slopestyle jumps melted into desert canyon terrain?
I'm a big proponent of Rampage going global - and thats from someone who lives just down the road from Virgin. I think the environment has gotten stale. It'd be sweet to see actual trail building taking place, with trails that actually last and can be ridden by mortals (with modification). Can you imagine a competition that spans the globe where teams of riders/builders have to a build a 1-Mile long trail and are judged not only by the creativity of riding that trail, but how accessible it is to the public (proximity to major populations) or how it can be ridden by a kid or a pro can throw massive gaps on it? Where the "crowds" viewing such trails would not be merely an audience, but could ride such trails, vote on them, etc.
Lets make Rampage a trail building contest, as well as a "who can go biggest" contest.
Rampage talk at about 27:00
...all I said was unless you water down what rampage is, realistically girls just won’t make it into the top 30 gnarliest riders in the world. This is not a dig or an insult, it’s just reality.
The question is just about making women more visible in this context to show others girls/women what is possible for them, but also on the flipside the returns the sponsors stand to gain from this happening. Expecting them to compete toe to toe with the dudes for a place in the comp is never going to work out.
It's tricky to determine at what point pushing for greater equality begins to go against nature. I think such cases are rare, but certain specific physical feats can come into this category. DH does not, it's just about how fast you can get down the mountain. With Rampage, I'm not sure how you'd go about leveling the playing field given the sheer strength you need to land without disintegrating on impact. Then again, there are (probably) lines at the Utah site that can be navigated without needing to be a beast, but these will not secure the rider many points, which would lead to questions being raised on the legitimacy of female riders being given a spot. I'd love to see Casey or others have a go, but there would be a lot of bitching on comment sections for all sorts of reasons. It's hard to get one's head around.
If billy from Idaho does a table top off a drop people watch, but when three others turn up and flip it, nobody cares who billy is anymore. Welcome to Earth. Don’t hate on me, I didn’t create it. Anyone who holds firm that they would watch the top spot women, better be paying attention to the 256th place man.. because if not you are more sexist than the people you slam. (This is not directed at you @BenPea
Casey, Sandler, and a bunch of other girls might be able to get to the level they need to be on for Rampage in a few years, but they aren't there yet from what I've seen.
The thing I don't understand is why everyone is saying women need to be paid the same. Why does the women's whip off winner get paid the same as the guy's? There was like 5 of them compared to 100 guys and they aren't even close to the same level. If they want to earn what the guys earn they either need to compete against them or generate the same amount of sales, which they currently don't.
I don't know if equal pay and opportunity can be summed into an "ideology" @tobiusmaximum, but if it is, I'm all in. Crankworx has specifically taken a stance on providing their male and female athletes with equal exposure and monetary compensation as a recognition of their talent, training, and hard work. What message does it send to female athletes when their cheques are only a fraction of their male counterparts'? I believe recognition of someone's financial worth as an athlete is an excellent way to encourage greater participation at the grassroot level, and ultimately in elite events.
It is also taking a social stance. What if not everything in life has to come down to the exact amount of sales directly generated by athletes? But has to encompass a recognition of their contribution to the sport? I also wonder what is the "bottom line" cost of Crankworx for giving equal pay at their events, and how that translates into capital and social benefits for the sport in general, inspiring more people to partake at all levels. And just to contradict myself a little here, I also believe brands benefit monetarily from sponsering women athletes as it is part of their sales demographics. I often read here how little women are on local trails in people's comments, but in BC, it's often 50/50, and I have been on many rides where I only encounter women and no dudes.
My unpopular opinion here, I think many men feel shortened when they see how successful female athletes can be while they may consider themselves to be of a higher calibre. There is to be a philosophical debate on why and how sports' categories came to be, and whether that is the best option, but I don't think this platform is necessarily the space for that.
So it is about money? You specifically used the term financial worth. How do you decide financial worth? And who is paying?
Veronique Sandler had the right idea when she said that it was time to prove that women can ride with guys. That should be the message they focus on, because that is what will make their pay rise to the level of men (or build massive social media followings, that would work too). Once they draw the same amount of views as the men they will be paid the same amount. The progression won't happen over night, but it can be done. Again, Vicki Golden has shown its possible. Watch the replay of X Games best whip from a few weeks ago, she can really throw a bike around.
Social stances are cool for privately owned companies, but publicly traded ones have a responsibility to their shareholders to generate the largest profit they can. If that means having nothing to do with women then so be it, fiduciary responsibility comes first. Obviously completely ignoring half the population is an extreme example, but I'm sure there are cases where it is the right thing to do.
Mountain biking might be popular with women where you live, but here in southern California from what I've seen they probably aren't even 10% of the riders. It would be interesting to see what the population looks like for the entire world or all of North America.
One thing with mountain biking compared to baseball, hockey, etc, is we don't know how much the teams/bike companies are paying the riders. For all we know, Casey Brown could be getting more money from Trek than the men on the factory dh team, or the more up and coming freeriders like Reed Boggs. Maybe 90% of females that go to bike parks want to ride a Session because of her. So even if the numbers we see publicly are less than men, the women have the opportunity to even it out on the backend.
It's not "about the money" but if you're restricted from being committed to your sport because you've got financial issues while you're sitting in the top 30 in the world of any sport - I'd say that's an issue.
Plus we know there's a huge difference in performance from a privateer vs a full sponsored pro. How are you supposed to get into the top 10 when there's not enough hours in the day to put in the work you need to do to get there?
I simply asked the question of mm2020 as a response to the phrase ‘recognition of someone’s financial worth’. I don’t think that was unreasonable to ask. It was right there, ‘financial worth’. Except, the point is, we don’t have to contrive some recognition of Loics financial worth..
As for tennis, not a comparison financially. If the top dude is getting millions just to wear a certain t shirt and shorts.. not really a comparison, wouldn’t you say? Are you alluding to some mtb conspiracy to not pay riders very much? Somehow riders are not getting their worth? Maybe they’re getting exactly their worth..
Regarding breaking into the top ‘xyz’ to be a pro.. it’s hard, and yes it reaps rewards when it happens. Camille is private, so is JVK. Is this fair? Probably. Should we give more ‘leg up’s’ to the top rank? Not if you want to retain the high standard..
If you're following the outspoken series, Loic and Troy think everyone on the circuit should be getting more for what they do, and I'd say they're in a better place to know what's going on than the PB comment section. Mostly what they'd like is transparency with contracts so you know what money everyone else is on and you can figure out what you're worth and it's not mostly decided by the sponsor. Which I think would be great.
I realize its impossible to quantify a riders worth, does having Loic on your brand sell more bikes for you than having Gwin? f*ck knows. But a pro rider certainly takes more risks and has a much higher chance of getting very broken than a tennis player, I'd like to see them compensated better for that risk.
Btw.. it’s not about risk. It’s about who is watching. Cliff divers take a lot of risk, but hardly anyone cares.
There are slave/owner situations everywhere, the owner always retains the upper hand because hundreds more slaves are ready for their chance to fill in. If Troy and Loic don’t like it, launch TroyLoic bikes and set their own wages. Based on sales hopefully, otherwise they won’t last long.
Sponsor driven sports (like mountain biking) are a completely different thing. These athletes are simply being paid to advertise a product. Whether its by riding that product to WC podiums, or by showcasing it in videos, its all just an advertisement. There is no direct revenue made from people paying to watch the sport which make it almost impossible to quantify the true "Value" of the riders to the companies who sponsor them. Because the riders aren't the product, they are simply marketing the products.
Its easy for me to say that riders should make more. I love what these people do and hope they make as much as they can. But I have to also realize that the market for these riders (advertisers) dictates those prices. Unless there is collusion among all the bike companies to cap what they will pay riders then you have to assume the free market is setting the correct price.
Two words - Brendan’s run!
Also, I'd love to see Lacondeguy take it this year. Dude deserves it.
The numbers don't lie. Everything you need to know about the declining relevance of rampage is in the view counts on YouTube.
View totals have been flat to down since it came back in 2012. Even at 4 to 5 million views per event recently, that isn't enough eyeballs or revenue to keep big sponsors like Redbull or Adidas around when you consider a single Danny MacAskill video can get 15 to 89 million views or some unknown can get the same 5 million posting their summer trip to the Whistler bike park or a bike repair hack.
Rampage only has 5 of the top 100 most watched videos on the Red Bull YouTube channel. And of those 5, 4 of them are the 2012 rampage and 1 of them is from 2013. If you go to the Red Bull Bike subchannel, the numbers don't redeem the event there either with the 2018 event just getting in the top 15 and still well behind previous years
People's interest in rampage peaked a while ago and sponsors like Red Bull will be moving on.
2. Sure the event doesn't get many views but the winning runs and highlights are raking in far more than the event replay... consider those (+ the people that attend the actual event)
3. If all the corporate-ness of the event left, then it would be more true to its roots than ever before. Just sending it in the desert and making a friendly competition out of it
4. Views on youtube don't mean shit when you can watch the event live, on youtube, on redbull.tv, etc. Interest isn't about youtube views.
He is an extremely good and fast rider but he always gives it 110%. He is going to be at rampage in a couple of years for sure!
I read the people who choose the wildcards as thewildcards....
I was pretty thrown off by the list, haha