PRESS RELEASE: RenthalThe new Fatbar Carbon features an upgraded width of 800mm. Whilst increasing the width, with efficient use of material, Renthal retains the same market-leading 225g weight and the same strength and flex characteristics of the original Fatbar Carbon. The
Developed alongside Renthal's World Cup DH race teams, the V2 Fatbar Carbon has already been used to win the 2017 UCI World Cup title, with YT Mob's Aaron Gwin. A testament to this handlebar's race-bred performance.
The V2 Fatbar Carbon is shipping internationally now, so contact your national distributor to locate your nearest dealer
https://cycling.renthal.com/shop/support/cycle-distributorsFeatures:UD Carbon Construction: The Fatbar Carbon uses a full UD carbon construction. Efficient placement and orientation of the uni-directional carbon fibres maximise the strength and stiffness of the handlebar.
Ride Tuned:The UD (uni-directional) carbon fibres are layered and aligned to give specific flex characteristics. The stiffness of the Fatbar Carbon results in incredible control, yet careful tuning gives the perfect level of comfort.
DH Race Ready:A full 800mm width, with 7deg backsweep / 5deg upsweep geometry is perfect for DH racing. Four rise options - 10, 20, 30 and 40mm, to allow you to choose the right bar for your body size, your riding style and your bike set-up.
Centre Profile:The 31.8mm central section extends much further than most other handlebars. Widening the span of this oversize section vastly increases the strength and stiffness of the Fatbar Carbon.
Ultra-Durable:Impact strength is hugely important in a DH race handlebar. This is why the Fatbar Carbon is designed to significantly surpass the EN BMX drop test standard.
Set-Up Markings:A central set-up grid and width markings allow accurate fine tuning, to personalise the fit of your Fatbar Carbon.
MSRP - USD $164.95 / £134.95
For more information, head to
https://cycling.renthal.com/shop/Riding photos - Isaac Paddock/YT Mob
MENTIONS: @renthalcycling
Renthal inspires confidence
Use a fresh 32tpi HSS hacksaw blade, tape the cutting zone with masking tape to prevent surface delamination, use park tool cutting guide, lubricate cut with water, and finish after cutting with fine grain wet and dry paper lubricated with water. When cutting, don't use standard practice of rotating hacksaw blade to present to material at 45 degrees but cut with blade at flat angle and soft pressure - this prevents damage to carbon fibre. Always use dust mask, we wash all cutting equipment after cutting and wipe down surfaces with wet cloth before disposal.
Good advice. Pipe cutter are made for plumber cutting soft metal tubing for plumbing installation, certainly not for carbon fibre composite or high strength aluminium alloy.
Never understood the mindset of taking lazy route by using incorrect tool for the job, and causing damage to expensive component.
I think 35mm makes more sense when viewed next to all the other tube diameters used on a bike. Granted, what matters most is... for a given material, what diameter provides the desired strength/weight/stiffness/durability tradeoff.
Again though, if you like them, run them, if not, don't.
Failed carbon bar = concave face
I really have no idea why people would consider this an acceptable risk to save 50g or so
If you bother to search, you'll find plenty of instances whereby alu bars snap off at the junction with the stem: poor maintenance, riders not undoing stem bolts properly when rotating the bars etc, all lead to stress raisers that can snap a metal handlebar. The crack propagation under typical riding load is sufficiently quick to cause catastrophic failure.
I run carbon bars myself on my trail bike but wouldn't on a DH bike.
Renthal stuff is as good as any, if you want carbon bars it's a good place to go.
Also, if you would break this handlebar, you would also break a BMX cro-mo handlebar. Is that really a legitimate fear?
It just seems completely insane
I can see that my opinion is controversial and probably not even the majority, but I still think you're all either crazy or deluded to use plastic handle bars.
Same with carbon cranks
Thankfully there are really nice carbon and alu bars available so everybody is happy (aprart from people who want to tell you your opinion is wrong of course!)
Lots of choice, lots of reasons for running either, everybody catered for.
At the end of the day I can comfortably throw a dh engineered aluminum stem and bar off a cliff put it on my bike and get home. Carbon just simply isn’t good in collisions, crashing is a part of the sport, and a handlebar sees a lot of contact with both ground and body in crashes. I’llalways Take safety and reliability over such a fairly insignificant amount of performance gains.
Carbon bars breaking at lock on clamp areas hardly happens "all the time". If for sure can happen, but that's why people should always pay attention to the Nm values of all bolts. It's easily avoidable if you use proper common sense.
If you like carbon bars then great, if not then don't use them, everybody has stories about both types, run what you feel best running, pick a quality bar of either material and most people have no issues anyway.
Also thank you for more opinion, as useless as it is to everybody.
I did agree with you that there are benefits of carbon, but to actually put a figure on the benefits is not going to happen unless an independent takes up the task.
Anything else is marketing and pseudo-science (ie BS)
Formula 1 = Real danger - lots of carbon.
If you design a carbon part right you get a nearly endless fatigue life. The same goes for steal. Aluminium will fail no matter if there is load or not
Same goes for 26" dirt jump bikes. The market is mainly teenagers or as a quiver bike. But, if you look at high-end pro level slopestlye bikes, some do come in carbon like the new YT Play. But again, the price is far too high especially in perhaps the most niche market in all of mountain biking. The market is simply too small for the investment to be made. That's why YT only made like 25 of those new bikes. Ultimately it comes down to market size and price, and carbon bikes and parts are simply not feasible.
Sorry that was unclear but aluminium has no endless fatigue life. No matter how small forces are it will break sooner or later.
When the GT Fury was carbon fiber, it was heavier than the aluminum version that eventually replaced it. It was over built and survived being run over by a car. Eventually, a carbon fiber frame can be made heavier and more durable than an aluminum or steel version but again, at a cost that simply doesn't make any viable sense.
youtu.be/4mrQda2gjIE