It's hard to believe, but the hydraulically-controlled Reverb will have been around for a decade in 2020, and due to an immense amount of OE spec, it's also been easily the most-used dropper post since, well, dropper posts became a thing. There have been a bunch of different versions and updates over that time, but the latest is by far the most notable: The ten-year milestone sees RockShox ditch the oil-filled hose for an encrypted wireless network.
That's right, there's no cable or hose connecting the remote to the post, but it comes at a price: The Reverb AXS goes for $800 USD, or exactly twice the price of a standard Reverb Stealth with their 1X remote. It's also a smidge heavier than a standard Reverb, at 657-grams for my 170mm-travel model, but you're paying extra for the missing hose, not missing grams.
Reverb AXS Details• Travel: 100, 125, 150, 170mm (tested)
• Electronic, wireless design
• Re-designed head, clamp
• Faster, fixed return speed
• SRAM battery, CR2032 in remote
• Lengths: 340, 390, 440, 480mm
• Sizes: 30.9, 31.6, 34.9mm
• Weight: 657-grams (post), 64-grams (remote)
• MSRP: $800 USD
• More info:
www.sram.com/rockshox Here's what you get for $800 USD: The post itself, the battery and its required charger, the shifter and its clamp, and some instructions.
The DetailsThe Reverb's remote doesn't have to pull any cable or push any oil, but it is the home for the electronic stuff, a common CR2032 battery, and the paddle. So instead of it being a barely-there remote, it kinda looks like a shifter at two-thirds scale, but with a single plastic thumb paddle that pivots from the top.
A small spring between the paddle and the remote provides the tension, just like on the AXS shifter, but the paddle itself is flatter in shape.
The Reverb's remote looks a lot like the one that controls AXS shifting, but the paddle is a bit flatter and can only be reached from the front.
The paddle is essentially a power button, and it only needs to travel a few millimeters before orders are barked to the receiver and tiny electric motor hidden inside the post's head. Then, without any delay, the power of science compels the motor to spin, which then turns the only seatpost-mounted gearbox that I can think of. That opens and closes the oil port that lets the Reverb move up and down, as well as lock in place anywhere in its travel, just like on those old fashioned hosed versions your dad used to use.
One last thing on the remote: As others have noted, I bet there's enough room on it for SRAM to offer an updated two-paddle version. So you could, you know, maybe
control your bike's suspension wirelessly? That'd be neat.
From left to right: The battery mount, the head that threads onto the stanchion with the plunger installed (red and silver circle), the circuit board, and the motor and gearbox assembly.
The head with its guts installed but the battery mount removed (left). The plunger (right) still needs to open and close and oil port, just like on the normal Reverb.
The post's head is home to that previously mentioned tiny motor, gearbox, and electronics, all of which forced RockShox to come up with a new clamp layout. While it looks like the dreaded single-bolt setup at first glance, a screw at the front is used to both adjust the tilt and lock it in place. Separating the clamping and tilt duties does make setup easier, too.
At the opposite end, there's a new feature called Vent Valve that lets you bleed air from the system to fix the annoying squishiness that can sometimes infect the Reverb. If that sounds similar to what BikeYoke has going on inside their Revive post, that's because it is. The difference is that RockShox uses an IFP to keep the air and oil separated while BikeYoke lets the two mix freely. That should make the Reverb less likely to get soft in the first place, and that matches my experience over that last six months.
The new head seperates rail clamping duties (left) and angle adjustment (right).
InstallationNot much to say here other than it's dead easy. The battery clips onto the back of the post's head, and pairing it with the remote is as simple as holding down the little buttons on each. Can you manage a Bluetooth speaker? Then I have faith that you can do this as well.
You have a bunch of mounting options when it comes to the remote. There's the standalone clamp that's useful if you end up wanting it to sit between your brake lever and grip, or the Matchmaker clamp that lets you attach it to the same perch as said brake lever. There are also two mounting locations on the shifter itself that let you move it inboard or outboard a touch. While I like the AXS shifter on its own standalone clamp so it sits really close to the grip, the differently shaped paddle on the Reverb remote means that it works fine with a more common Matchmaker setup. If you're going to pay $800 USD for a seatpost, you better take the time to set it up perfectly.
With the battery installed, the head is much larger than a normal Reverb.
PerformanceMuch like
the AXS drivetrain I reviewed a few weeks back, the wireless Reverb was used on multiple bikes and by multiple riders over the last six months. At this point, it's going on over seventy rides and 50,000 meters of climbing and descending during everything from two-day bikepacking trips on a steel hardtail to countless climbs and descents on a Tallboy, Megatower, and now a Pole Stamina 140.
Moments when you need your seat to lower by just a bit are when the Reverb AXS comes into its own.
How many times have I been stranded miles from civilization with a dead battery during those rides? Zero times, although I think it was getting pretty close on a couple of occasions as I often kept using it regardless of the yellow warning light coming on. RockShox is saying to expect somewhere around forty-hours of ride-time, twice what the same battery offers when it powers the drivetrain. It's also going to depend on the type of terrain you spend your time on; it'll last longer if most of your rides go straight up before coming straight back down than if you ride rolling trails that call for plenty of seat height adjustment.
For me, the yellow light would show up after a bit more than two-ish weeks, or between seventeen and twenty-three rides. Because I tend to micro-adjust its height for tricky climbs, I suspect that I'm using my dropper post more than most riders. Either way, the performance doesn't change as the juice goes down, and battery life seems to be more than sufficient.
The AXS remote is much, much more ergonomic than either RockShox's two previous attempts at a dropper post lever, but it could be better if they had tucked it even closer to the handlebar.
On the ergonomic front, I've had a few riders tell me that they don't get along with the shape the AXS shifter's paddle, but it makes more sense when you get it closer to the grip on a standalone clamp. The Reverb's flatter paddle felt near enough to the grip on the Matchmaker clamp, but I think it could be even better; a different mount that tucks the remote up even closer to the handlebar - and the thumb - would be ideal. It's not bad, but it could be really good.
The feel is basically the same as the AXS shifter, with a tactile click that lets you know you've done something and only a few millimeters of travel.
Think of the paddle as your switch; the post is free to go up and down through its travel when you press and hold the switch, and it locks in place when you let it go. That brings us to the e-Verb's most useful feature: You can bump the bottom edge of the paddle and sort of let your thumb push off of it as soon as it activates the post, quickly dropping or raising it by just about five-millimeters each time.
This 'feathering' of sorts is incredibly useful on awkward, technical climbs or rolling trails where some extra clearance can make you feel a lot more comfortable. And, aside from the missing hose, it's probably the only place where the AXS e-Verb beats the standard version if you want to talk strictly performance and forget how neat it is to have a wireless party post.
A normal dropper post doesn't feel slow or difficult to master... Until you try the Reverb AXS.
The novelty of it being wireless will eventually wear off, though, and then it needs to work like any other dropper post. Actually, it should probably out-perform them given its price. Thankfully, the changes that RockShox made to the latest hosed Reverb are also used on the AXS version. That means it gets the new internal floating piston, slipperier grease, and new hydraulic fluid from Maxima that's supposed to decrease the force required to push it down by 50-percent. I'm not sure about that number, but it does seem to need much less bum-pushing than the previous generation Reverb.
The return speed is faster for the same reasons, but not quick enough to be alarming to anyone's anythings, and there's a notable and intentional top-out clunk that lets you know it's back at full-mast. All of that, and especially the ability to easily feather the travel, means that I found myself lowering (or raising) my seat even more often than I would when using a traditional dropper post. It's easier to use, so I used it more.
The post's battery pops off with one hand, just like with the AXS derailleurs, and it refused to rattle loose or lose connection.
Reliability has been... Perfect. But first, it's no secret that the Reverb has a bit of a bad rep on that front, but I'd argue that's at least partially due to it being by far the most widely used dropper over the last decade; RockShox has had a vastly dominant share of the market's OE spec, so there's simply far more of them out there to fail. That said, I know plenty of people who've gone through countless squishy Reverbs over the years, sometimes with only a handful of rides between it sinking under their weight, so any concern about a new version that costs twice as much is entirely valid.
My test post is six months and over seventy rides deep at this point, all without a single hiccup. It's gone up or down every time I've asked it to and without any hesitation, and I haven't needed to test the air-evacuating Vent Valve feature because it's been rock solid since it arrived. As with any dropper, there's a slight amount of free-play between the stanchion and bushings that's required for the post to move smoothly, but it hasn't gotten any sloppier since it came out of the box.
At this point, my Reverb AXS gets a 10/10 on the reliability front, but I'll update this review if that changes down the road.
The Reverb AXS has been trouble-free from day one, and I can't fault it for any part of its performance. To be honest, I also think it's pretty neat that I can control my dropper post wirelessly; there's no hose to accidentally damage in a crash or give you a stroke while trying to push it through your bike's convoluted internal cable routing, and it makes for a clean looking bike. But for twice as much money? Eeesh, I'm not sure about that given that the latest Reverb Stealth has all the internal updates that the AXS versions gets, so it should work just as well (minus the feathering function) but has a hose and costs $400 instead of $800. It's your money, but I'm just sayin'.
Pros
+ No hose means simplicity, possibly better reliability
+ Feathering function is very useful
+ 170mm of infinite seat height
Cons
- Batteries mean remembering to charge them
- Twice(!) as much as a standard Reverb
- Ergonomics are good but could be better
Pinkbike's Take:  | Price tag aside, the Reverb AXS is damn impressive. The short-throw of the paddle and instantaneous response make it easier and faster to use on the trail, which is especially valuable when things are happening quickly or it's quite technical, and I lowered my seat more often than when using a traditional post on the same rides because of that. That's a result of the wireless control which, along with the internal updates to the post itself, make the Reverb AXS hard to beat if we're talking pure performance. — Mike Levy |
On the one hand, I’m with you —there’s no way I’m spending $800 on a dropper. On the other hand, it’s such an irrelevant comment. One can get any number of droppers for less than half this price. (Each with its own set of problems, it seems). So what? Everyone knows that. That’s not news. Why even mention it?
Take away the price, and look at this product for what it is — a new, cutting-edge piece of technological advancement that works. That’s pretty cool.
Really only thing stopping me is the 200 grams. I've spent too much making my trail bike light to just throw 200 grams on all Willy nilly
So glad there's smaller companies giving SRAM a run for their money these days.
By the way the old "take a shit" is old and tired like your mom.
No fatal issues, but overall a pretty mediocre post if I’m being honest. About that same as my BrandX and certainly not as refined as Fox or Crankbrothers.
I've used a BikeYoke, Reverb, RaceFace Affect and KS Lev Integra in the past, and I'd put the OneUp close to par with my BikeYoke in quality and reliability thus far so I'm really surprised to hear such harsh experiences to the contrary. I suppose theres always a few that don't work well...
My OneUp lasted 3 rides before it started getting stuck down and had to be pulled free. I pulled it apart and rebuilt it and regreased the seal assembly. 4 more rides and the same issue occurred. My brother has an e13 dropper and it was broken damn near right out of the box (not surprising given the reviews) and his replacement Bike Yolk has only been so/so with some sticky action on the return occasionally. I'm honestly just gonna buy a new Reverb since I've had good experiences with them.
Then for half the price the bikeyoke for $400.
Then for half the price the oneup for $200.
Then for half the price the brand x for $100.
Then for half the price the tmars for $50.
Then for half the price a hope quick release for $25.
Then for half the price a bontrager clamp for $12.
...You're stupid
I could buy a new drivetrain and an inexpensive cable actuated dropper.
Awesome for racers with a large budget.
The Revive 185mm dropper with remote and cable/housing weighs 686 grams.
r2-bike.com/ROCK-SHOX-Seatpost-Reverb-AXS-A1-150-mm-316-mm
But the stack height is too much and I can't for a 150 on my bike.
I really like the idea of no thumb force needed and that I can just quickly tap it to get small adjustment. Because I'm constantly adjusting my height while riding.
I have available a axs 150mm for $600 but the revive has one of the lowest stack heights and weights.
So it would be hard to Justify. I'll just wait for the Bikeyoke version.
Sorry had to be petty.
I can't decide...
Anyway, as somebody who is an adult with a real job and who also doesn't have kids, this post looks pretty cool. But I'm a sucker for putting shit on my bike that works and doesn't need a lot of maintenance or constant adjustment even when it costs more. This post sounds pretty trouble free. $800 bucks is a bit ridiculous for a glorified electric office chair post though, I'll admit.
Im an “adult” with a “real job” two kids, mortgage and send it higher and further every time, no f*cks given
Codes/Dominions/Trickstuff etc are the best brakes you can buy. Pretty sure they were on the winning EWS bike this year (and previously) as well...and that isn't some quick DH race that's over in 4mins. Codes are insanely nice for a do-everything brake. Reliability is on par with Shimano...tho Shimano bite point stuff and poor modulation is frustrating (not ideal performance for $$$ brake).
Enduro did the best brake test ever. Again...the guides aren't great, tho nicer RSC's were fine for me reliabilty wise (better than my XT's 8000), the performance suffered. Not enough power and too much modulation. SRAM needs to just stop making all of their other brakes (aside from maybe nicer Levels) and just make Codes. They nailed it with that break.
enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy
Besides, the ability of One-Up's post to adjust the amount of travel to perfectly fit your need is so nice that it should be listed as a con on all other posts that dont have that option.
I'm not disagreeing with your comment, I just don't understand it...
Granted, I'm still on a 100mm dropper and I'd definitely like more travel. But when I've demoed bikes with 170mm drop I just can't really see any benefit to the last 30mm or so, and I run my post pretty damn high. I found myself always bottoming it out, then trying to come up a bit to where sitting didn't feel so awkward. If all these mega long travel posts were travel adjustable I would get it - sell one long travel post and let the users customize it with spacers or whatever. As is it seems pretty overkill.
1. People like you and I of average height and proportions who do just fine with a 150 and don’t understand why people are so worked up over dropper height.
2. Tall, lanky people with longer inseams who actually need the longer drop for reasons others described above. If you were to read Pink Bike comments, these people make up 85 percent of the population, apparently.
3. Jerry Bros who read the comment section and know radness doesn’t even begin until 250mm of drop. I suspect many of these people are 85 percent of the 85 percent mentioned above.
I'm riding a large frame (which is about a 19" maybe) - 150mm drop but I've about 10cm of post showing from seatpost to top of bottom collar - so about 25cm of post sticking out the system. Previous bike was a similar size and similar height and my rigid post bikes (when I had them) also had similar proportions - I'm lanky though so don't need the saddle hitting off the cranks to get it out the way. Just because a company is selling a massive drop post doesn't mean it is good or needed, but the marketing hype will suggest it is better.
I've seen far better riders than me riding rigid posts and they also seem to move around without any issues, so although it sounds like a good thing, I'm genuinely not seeing the benefit of having something that long and thinner than the seatpost wiggling around with a weight perched on it.
Obviously just my view (although someone else above has posted saying Bike Yoke claim something similar to this).
I'm not imagining needing a 170mm dropper. Last bike had 125mm and it wasn't enough. If I didn't bring an Allen and further drop the post lower for the DH the saddle was all up in my ass. Especially on steeper terrain. New bike was ok at 170mm. Until I got a different seat. I still get along with it but with the longer geo, 77° STA and saddle being central it sure likes to get in the way. Other bike is an aggressive HT and I get along ok with 150mm but it still gets in the way on steeper terrain and because no rear suspension.
For reference on my FS I have about ~40mm of post exposed, on my HT I have 30mm of post exposed (not including collar).
Yes I've seen plenty of way better riders on rigid XC bikes with rigid posts handle it just fine. It's just not the way I want to ride my bike. I don't get what difference it makes to you if I need a longer post?
edit: it's probably because a lot of us are riding longer bikes and our center of gravity is more central (where the saddle is) and we're no longer hanging off the back over the rear tire as you indicated.
I need atleast 5cm more seatpost lenght than my friends who are as tall as me.
Sucks as I cant Install a 200mm dropper sadly as it will stick out and will be too high then.
I kind of feel, in all fairness, that any lipo battery operated bike product review ought to at least speak to this scenario.
Sincerely someone that has used battery operated devices in the cold.
Thats an undervolt condition. Batteries don't die from the cold, they just don't produce full voltage.
That being said - I've rode in -15C (5f) with a cable XX1 and the old RS - and it's garbage, but it got me where I wanted
No battery/charge issues yet on seatpost or drivetrain. Out of my garmin devices, two axs bits, headphones and iPhone, the iPhone hates the cold most battery wise - frankly I’m surprised that the edge head unit held up being out in the cold for 3-4 hrs - but it did drain battery noticeably faster. Garmin watch and headphones seemed to be relatively unaffected, and I’ve learned from the past that the phone should be on the innermost layer of clothing to keep it warm and alive.
Coldest I’ve had the bike out was around 15 degrees f, bike outside on the car and out riding for around 6 total hrs in that temp (psa, don’t do this, it’s miserable). Left with a full charge, everything was still in the green when I got back.
I frequently ride when it’s about 30 degrees out and everything’s been fine. 40 and above, I wouldn’t even worry about it. Of course, the battery percentages on the app and the blinky light system aren’t the most accurate, but I’ve gotten in a few good rides and it hasn’t started telling me to charge it yet. I’m sure there’s an impact, it’s just not big enough to make an apparent difference at this point.
Only disappointment I’ve had is a maybe 1-2mm squish in the reverb that vanished after doing the vent valve plunger.
I‘ll pass on this one, rather get a Revive
Kidding.
17 rides = 17 weeks for me.
Even the shifting systems are not up to par for what I expect for the price. The controller needs to have programmable buttons for the specific gears, so you can set them up before hand for something like an enduro race where you know what gear you need to be in.
Also, you need to have the option to link both dropper and shifting (with the option to link the electronic shock/fork adjust later on). For example, you have one button for "steep climb" - you press it and the derailleur begins the process to shift to the lowest gear, not going all the way until you put pedal strokes in, and the dropper automatically pops up. At the top of the climb, you press another button for descend and the dropper goes down while the derailleur starts to shift to a higher gear. All of this is already possible to do.
Likewise, you should also be able to pair the power meter, speed/cadence sensors, and gps units and have the option to program shifting and dropper post based on that.
Funny things is Im pretty sure that all of that is coming, industry is doing the standard incremental release so you buy the shit now at a high price, then you upgrade to the latest and greatest stuff with more features, taking you twice or thrise the cost instead of just a one time investment.
On my AXS derailleur set up for example I’m using the one you show here, so it aims toward the right hand grip, and positions the RD shifter closer to the grip.
I actually prefer to run it backwards, as I like a bigger gap so my thumb doesn't hit the paddle, but seriously, c'mon @mikelevy
Seriously???
Use your right Matchmaker X on the left and the left one on the right... Tadam!
Who would leave his or her bike out if sight for even a second...?
Go to an uplift day? Ski lift user? Stopping to give a message to someone inside a shop/building? Plenty of opportunity if the person has an idea of what is being used.
Sad state of affairs but such is life these days.
That separate tilt and clamping feature is incredibly nice, however. No more over or under torquing saddle clamps!
They did - you've got the MMX clamps on the wrong sides
SRAM never fails to amaze. I'll give them that.
"...due to an immense amount of OE spec, it's also been easily the most-used dropper post since..."
It's a political reason those posts are OE spec... SRAM works with OE's and says "all or nothing" on their components... it's not because they are high quality, it's because of how the do business.
When the reverb that comes on my new bike inevitably craps out, I will throw it away and get a oneup or a 9point8.
My trek dropper and fox transfer posts ( cable actuated) have never failed ... even down to -20 degrees centigrade. When, and if, I bought a new ride it would be the first thing to go...
And that comment from Levy about how Reverb's probably get a bad rap since they are the most speced OE.
Any bike shop I've ever walked into, those posts come up and or one is being warrantied.
Sorry I buy 2 Vyrons...
In all seriousness, if I only had 350$ to spend on a dropper, I'd go with BikeYoke or whatever is the most realiable mechanic post right now. But never the Vyron...that thing is just horribly engineered.
Check out the internets and you'll find online shops that sell the AXS reverb for around CHF600.-. But having had it for several months and being a heavy 100kg+ guy that rides 8h a week on average and that has had many droppers just give up, I'm super happy with my Reverb AXS...no problems at all. And luckily in my case, price wasn't an issue.
A dude i know did this, was funny to watch…
Really?
With that caveat, anything is AWESOMER.