Ride Concepts Launches 2022 Shoe Collection

Mar 1, 2022
by Alicia Leggett  
photo

Ride Concepts has announced its Spring and Summer 2022 shoe collection, with a few new additions to the lineup alongside some updated returners. There's lots of cushioning and impact absorption to see here, with D3O material in the insoles of the higher-performing shoes and EVA foam layers in almost every model. The outsoles all feature some variation of a hexagonal pattern, in three versions: Max Grip, which has the grippiest rubber, High Grip, which provides more adjustability for slopestyle riders and the like, and Clip Grip, which - as the name suggests - incorporates a cleat channel.

Here's what there is to see this spring.



Tallac & Flume

photo
photo

The Tallac and Flume shoes are the big news here, as they are all-new for this spring. As the latest addition to Ride Concepts' trail and all-mountain lineup, the Tallac (men's) and Flume (women's) shoes come in both flat and clip options as well as both BOA and traditional lace-up designs.

The shoes are Ride Concepts' first releases that incorporate Cordura stitch-free uppers, plus the clip version has an extended cleat channel for lots of adjustment options. Weighing between 365g (lace-up flat pedal Flume) and 570g (BOA clip pedal Tallac), the Flume and Tallac slot into the Ride Concepts line as a robust do-it-all shoe.

photo
photo

Features:
- Grippy rubber outsole with hexagon pattern and "reverse hex" traction pattern on toe and heel in Max Grip compound (flat) and Clip Grip design (clip)
- Lightweight bonded upper featuring Cordura mesh for durability and
breathability
- TPU toe and heel protection
- TPU mud guard to protect against dirt, debris and rubbing
- D3O High Impact Zone Technology insole for impact absorption
- EVA midsole for extra cushion and support
- Heel pull tab for easy entry
- Sizes: US M 7-13, W 5-10
- Weight: 365 - 570g, depending on the model
- Price: $160 (flat lace-up) - $210 (clip BOA), depending on the model

Hellion

photo
Hellion Elite
photo
Hellion Clip

Next up are the Hellion Elite and Hellion Clip. Available in both men's and women's versions, the Hellion shoe is Ride Concepts' lightest shoe, and it's now available in a clip version. The shoe has been upgraded with an anti-microbial lining and a microfiber upper that promises to use at least 30% recycled plastic.

Features:
- Grippy rubber outsole with hexagonal pattern in Max Grip compound (flat) and Clip Grip design (clip)
- Recycled microfiber upper (30% PET) with perforated ventilation for breathability
- Anti-abrasion toe and heel protection
- Anti-bacterial mesh lining to control
- D3O® High Impact Zone Technology insole for impact absorption
- EVA midsole for extra cushion and support
- Fully gusseted tongue to keep dirt out
- Sizes: US M 7-15, W 5-10
- Weight: 355g (women's flat) - 501g (men's clip), depending on the model
- Price: $150

Traverse

photo
photo

A few notches higher on the burly-ometer, the Traverse is Ride Concepts' new women's gravity shoe for enduro and downhill riders. There's D3O material both underneath and around the foot, with an impact-absorbent insole and collar around the inside of the ankle.

Features:
- Clip Grip outsole
- PU synthetic upper with mesh screen for weather-resistance and breathability
- PowerDrive nylon shank for power and stiffness
- D3O High Impact Zone Technology insole for impact absorption, plus D3O in the medial collar, too
- Sizes: US W 5-10
- Weight: 475g
- Price: $180

Vice

photo
photo

Ride Concepts' lifestyle and BMX shoe sees an update as it becomes Caroline Buchanan's signature model. The sole has a waffle-esque "inverse hexagon" pattern, which Ride Concepts says brings the pedal closer to the rider (but not too close), and a microfiber synthetic upper.

Features:
- RC Fuzion outsole with inverse hexagon pattern in High Grip compound
- Abrasion- and weather-resistant microfiber upper
- D3O High Impact Zone Technology insole for impact absorption
- Integrated gaiter keeps debris out
- Internal TPU toe protection
- Fully gusseted tongue
- Sizes: US W 5-10
- Weight: 380g
- MSRP: $100

Livewire

photo
photo

The Livewire is Ride Concepts' go-to, classic shoe that is made to fit the whole family as it's available in men's, women's, and youth sizes. For this year, the outsole has been upgraded to the grippiest Max Grip rubber compound, but the shoe keeps the rest of its simplicity, going with a lace closure and elastic lace tuck to keep things tidy.

Features:
- Grippy outsole in Max Grip compound
- Synthetic, abrasion-resistant mesh upper
- Toe and heel protection
- EVA midsole and dual-layer EVA insole provide support and cushioning
- Fully gusseted tongue
- Elastic lace tuck
- Sizes: US M 7-15, W 5-10, Y 2-6
- Weight: 330g-435g
- MSRP: $110

Lastly, each shoe is available in lots of color options. Visit rideconcepts.com to learn more.

Author Info:
alicialeggett avatar

Member since Jun 19, 2015
745 articles

130 Comments
  • 81 6
 Oh FFS, I keep asking for patent leather thigh high waterproof riding shoes with a 4 inch heel and boa closure but none of the companies are making what I want. You all suck.
  • 17 15
 Boa? GTFO with that.
  • 33 0
 Feather Boa?
  • 14 2
 Username checks out
  • 1 1
 @oatkinso: That comment is quick enough for a KOM
  • 21 2
 I'm pretty sure when you have a velcro strap right at the bottom of the shoe that it does nothing. I don't get having a boa closure but then one single pointless velcro strap underneath it.
  • 19 0
 It's for those days you accidently put your shoes on backwards.
  • 3 1
 Never had boa mtb shoes but on my wading shoes and snowboard boots it could be a pain to cinch up the bottom with the boas. A velcro strap to cinch it up would have been nice.
  • 7 2
 My road shoes have this setup and I like it, the BOA is good for even tension and it's nice to be able to cinch up near the ball of the foor independently
  • 1 0
 @debaser113: Wouldn't tightening up in one area cause an overall drop in BOA tension?
  • 4 0
 It's cause the BOA doesn't go down that far and if it did would probably make it too tight down low trying to make it tight enough at top. So the strap is if you need more tension lower down. Ton's of BOA shoes are like that?
  • 1 0
 People can have pretty drastic differences in foot width at the forefoot. But even still, yeah it won't do much.
  • 27 17
 Yesss!!! More ugly MTB shoes to choose from!


Those Etnies the other day are the only cool looking MTB shoes since 2009 I have to say…..
  • 94 2
 Do you ride with a chain wallet???
  • 16 0
 @unrooted: Boom roasted
  • 7 2
 Some of these companies might as well start collaborating with Kanye to really maximize ugliness.
  • 2 0
 @unrooted: I used to, a lot!! That was in the bmx days though :-)
  • 8 0
 My Hellion Elites have been kickass with that Max Grip rubber. Way better grip than the original Powerlines I had to begin with that didn't have it.

And a total upgrade from my 5.10 Impact Pros too, in terms of comfort and water absorption.

The Tallac (the one without straps/boa/clips) looks interesting!
  • 12 5
 Looks just like their older 5.10 shoes and I don't see anything new here. Where exactly is the innovation?
A wide toe box shoe? A high top version that is still flexible at the ankle but closed that no trail debris get into the shoe. Less Goofy looking shoes. No laces or at least a place to stoe them for good on the platform pedal shoes.

Why is the top half of the same shoe even different when it is a flat/clip shoe?
  • 22 0
 Yeah, why do clipless shoes get a Velcro strap and the flats don't? Not just these ones, but most brands seem do this and can't understand why?
  • 6 0
 @harbs32: thought that might be just the pictures in the press release, but I've been on the website and it's true for pretty much all the shoes. The strap is so useful for keeping mud out of the knot, as well as a quick cinch down before a descent.
  • 41 0
 @mountainsofsussex: Remembers to cinch down strap on shoes, forgets to unlock rear shock
  • 10 0
 @harbs32: I guess it's because they have more upward pressure applied inside the shoe as the riders foot pulls up on the upstroke. Over time that'd work the laces in a laces only setup loose.
  • 2 0
 @Waldon83: Every. Time.
  • 10 1
 @harbs32: because with clipless you can push and pull the pedals with your feet where as flats you only push your pedals so they don't need the extra strength to hold your foot in the shoe.
  • 8 0
 To be fair, the article doesn't claim that there's any innovation. What innovation would you like?
  • 2 6
flag Serpentras (Mar 1, 2022 at 7:28) (Below Threshold)
 @redrook: just like I said give me a wide toe box as an example. Gimme measurements like a jeans maybe?
Width AND length. That this should be a innovation is even embarrassing to all people with wide feet.

Your right they don't claim a innovation but why do I need a new shoe with just a different design as others have different features that I want?
Nothing about the shoes make me "shut up and take my money"
  • 5 0
 @Serpentras: That's fair enough, but it's not like any other brands are providing wild innovation every year, they mostly just re-style the same thing. Why demand that of this company and not others? If you don't want it that's fine, but innovation is not the reason people buy things, they mostly want the same but slightly different - these seem to fit that bill perfectly. I wouldn't buy them either, 5:10 work well for me, but maybe other people will prefer the look of these. Other people buy other makes despite the fact that I think they look like crap. I'm not going to pretend that 5:10s innovation is amazing me every year Wink
  • 1 5
flag Serpentras (Mar 1, 2022 at 8:27) (Below Threshold)
 @redrook: well fair question, why? Because they are long in the BIZ and are the dudes behind the initial 5.10 shoes , aren't they? I just expect more from veterans of the game and I am sick of narrow shoes.
Remember the last survey that wasn't so long about shoes? More then 15% WANT a wider shoe if you look into it. If you also look at the pictures, the "When Air Jordans met the Trailcross." was a special shoe unlike anything else you saw on that list. I had one of those but could get my hands on a bigger size...

Maybe I will stick that to any new announcement form now on I can spot because I dont look every week into Pinkbike.

Everyone can buy what they want, I never said someone should not do it or call people crazy about that.
I cant understand it but that doesn't matter.
I would buy stuff that works but looks crap just because it works and no one else can provide it.

Function over Form everyday for me personally.
  • 1 0
 @Serpentras: being that they are already designed after skate shoes they are wide toed. I have very wide feet and have a hell of a time finding work boots but I've never had a problem with bike shoes that are designed around the skate shoe style.
  • 1 3
 @mhoshal: I have yet to find a normal shoe that is wide enough. Boots with a steel safty cap are the worst or hiking boots.
  • 2 0
 @harbs32: when riding flats you don't pull up on the pedal. with clipless you do/can.
  • 5 0
 @Serpentras: And these probably function just as well as most other brands. Therefore form is the deciding factor for most people Wink

Introducing a wide toe box wouldn't be innovation, that would just be the fit of that particular shoe. Incidentally it would maybe fit you better, but then not other people. If you are yet to find a normal shoe wide enough I'd argue that your foot shape is unusual, and sadly people with more unusual foot shapes are under-catered for.
  • 1 1
 @mhoshal: I have a wide foot and have the Vice Which fit great ,stick like shit to a blanket and are really durable, all for $100.00 Canadian.
  • 5 1
 @DJ-24: There ya go! There's something for everyone out there. No need for whining because every brand doesn't do everything for everyone.
  • 5 1
 @Serpentras: "give me a wide toe box as an example. Gimme measurements like a jeans maybe?
Width AND length."

None of those are innovations, that's just providing product dimensions. The product itself is not being innovative. You could *maybe* say that providing width dimensions is innovative in terms of product description, but it's not, a lot of shoes come in different widths (which are denoted by letters, D, EE, etc.). Bike/hiking shoes tend not to be because you're supposed to try them on, they're all build on different lasts and have their own particular fit. Some models will be wide, some will be narrow. But if you're yet to find a shoe wide enough for you I'd say you're the unusual one, and I say that as someone with a wide foot. Before you whine about innovation you might want to figure out what it means.
  • 1 4
 @rbeach: I write it again differently,
Get me the same shoe in different widths for the same length. That's why I said like a jeans.
I never saw the same size with a different width, show me an example if there is something like it.
Again if there are wide enough shoes why does this survey said 15% or more want a wider shoe?
If you call this whining I would say you can't take criticism.
Also if you want to quote something then quote the whole thing and get it back into context. Because I wrote that this isn't even something really innovative. Some of you want to criticize my criticism I wrote in 5min, and expect that I come up with something just on the spot ha.

I don't care about different shoe models are more or less narrow, thats just like it is and for its purpose differently build.


Why someone downvotet that I can't find a really shoe that fits is beyond me.
  • 3 0
 @Serpentras: That's totally fine, you can want that, but it's not innovation that's my point. You whined about it not being innovative, and then what you want isn't actually innovation at all, it's just a bigger size of shoe. That's not innovation, that's just making a big shoe.

It would only be my inability to take criticism if I had a stake in this company, but I don't, nor did I design these shoes. But I do know the meaning of the word innovation.

I don't need to quote the whole thing, anyone reading can see your post. The context also doesn't help you Wink

The fact that you bitched about a lack of innovation and then couldn't come up with anything says it all Smile
  • 3 0
 What would be really "innovative" (not really) would be making shoes cost less. I worked for a shoe company that I won't name, and every year we would get a 70% discount on a couple of pairs...and the company STILL made a profit on that. So >70% of what you pay a shoe company is profit. Some "innovative" pricing would be pretty nice Wink
  • 1 4
 @rbeach: just a bigger shoe? Nope, how is independent width and length the same as just a bigger shoe? I know enough people who are on both ends of the spectrum without searching for them.


I asked about a shoe who does this and there is apparently no answer.

Tho ask the customer to try everything first is just stupid if there was a better measurement. Ordering every damn shoe is just wasteful just to send them all back and wait to get a big refund. Going locally isn't good either because most brands have noone or not all models.

Wellp I don't give others enough ideas because this isn't my job and I don't want to take more time for social media stuff a day.
  • 5 1
 @Serpentras: Lol you've really gone off the rails. The point is that what you want isn't innovative. If you bitch about wanting innovation then you'd better at least know what that means.

DJ-24 above gave you an answer. Come back when you've tried what he recommended.

The entire hiking/biking shoe industry seems to be doing just fine on the current model, so I don't think they need your amazing ideas Wink People get to know what fits them and what doesn't through trying things. Once you know what works keep buying that. I buy 5:10 because I know they fit me and I haven't returned a pair in 10+ years.

But that's all irrelevant. The point is that you asked for innovation and then said you wanted wider shoes. That's not innovation. Get over it Smile
  • 2 0
 @Serpentras: Try Merrell Moab hiking shoes, they have Vibram soles and are super wide fitting. If they aren't wide enough for you then you're very unusual and you can't expect companies to cater for complete outliers. It sucks but that's reality.
  • 1 0
 @Jackaboo: +1 on Merrells. Also the Chameleon (Cham) as the sole is stiff. Annoying problem to have, I awkward shaped feet too (narrow heel, wide forefoot), but the sheer number of different foot shapes makes it impossible for companies to reasonably cater for everyone, so they cater for the majority. I understand this and have to work around it. That's life.
  • 1 2
 @mhoshal: you absolutely can pull with a flat pedal. You can't pull up, but most of your pull is primarily going to be pulling back at the bottom of the stroke, not pulling up with your hip flexors. I've been doing it all winter on my trainer with my road bike.
  • 1 0
 @redrook: you like a stiff hiking shoe?
  • 2 0
 @Serpentras: Yes, especially if I'm going up hills/mountains, obviously not too stiff though like a B2/B3. But also bike shoes should be stiff so you're getting even pressure and not bending your foot around the pedal.
  • 3 0
 @conman1395: Then it's a push, not a pull.

You absolutely cannot pull (which would be upwards) - www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7MsXVlo1H8&ab_channel=JeffKendall-Weed
  • 1 5
flag conman1395 (Mar 5, 2022 at 19:35) (Below Threshold)
 @redrook: uh, you push down and can either pull back or pull up. Pedaling is in a circle, but the quads, hamstrings, hip extensors and hip flexors all do different portions of the downward, upward, bottom and top centers. A flat pedal can't pull up, but it can do the other three portions, one of which is a pull (which the bottom center would be), while in a seated cycling position.

Instead of citing Jeff Kendallweed, on YouTube, how about you look up biomechanics on PubMed.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31933344
  • 5 0
 @conman1395: Lol, he's doing it with pieces of wood on his feet, he's not pulling up because it's physically impossible. It's nothing to do with biomechanics it's to do with physics.

Have you actually read the article you linked to? Because it's not free to access. Come back when you've read it and can provide a quote (which isn't in the abstract), because it is using PULL as an acronym. Get access to the article, read it, quote it, and explain it. Then you can start to cite it.
  • 5 0
 @redrook: Lol I love when people are clearly just googled their own opinion and found something vaguely similar without actually reading it. What a clown.
  • 5 0
 @conman1395: You cannot pull up on a flat pedal. That is a fact. The "scoop" is a myth.
  • 5 0
 @conman1395: Instead of citing articles you clearly haven't read, maybe you should watch videos of Jeff Kendalweed proving that pulling up on a flat pedal is bullshit.
  • 1 1
 You're the whiner. I was commenting that I had one of the above models and how great they are.
  • 1 6
flag conman1395 (Mar 8, 2022 at 3:06) (Below Threshold)
 @redrook: yes I can and did read it, I'm in med school so I have access to most of PubMed. I forgot I was logged in, that's my bad. You should be able to read the abstract that states the 4 portions of the circle though.
But none of you are bothering to even read what I've clearly written so I'll write it again. You cannot pull UP on a flat pedal, which you dunces have stated multiple times along with myself. However, you can pull a pedal backwards. Obviously nobody scoops (plantarflexes) when cycling so there's no upward force. You're an idiot if you think you can plantarflex through the pedaling motion. However, if a pedal is at the bottom of the stroke, you can absolutely use your hamstring to pull it BACKWARDS about 20* before you'd have to pull UP. Literally all of you have a bike you could sit on and put one leg on a pedal and do this.
  • 1 6
flag conman1395 (Mar 8, 2022 at 3:07) (Below Threshold)
 @Jackaboo: and you should read what I wrote because I never said you could pull up.
  • 1 6
flag conman1395 (Mar 8, 2022 at 3:08) (Below Threshold)
 @Greeta25: I agree, read what I wrote and you'll see that I said that
  • 1 6
flag conman1395 (Mar 8, 2022 at 3:50) (Below Threshold)
 @redrook: here's "physics" for you.

youtu.be/c74smIB6uf0

I made a video since you can't bother to read what I said every time, which is you can't pull up, but you can pull back. You sent a video about bunny hopping, I'll send you a video about pedaling, which we're actually talking about. In the video you can clearly see how with a flat foot, you can move the pedal 20 degrees. If you plantarflex, you can move it further (the "scoop"). Obviously no plantarflexes while pedaling, so nobody scoops. Don't be an idiot. Read what I wrote.

If you wanna talk about "physics" then that's fine. Biomechanics and physics were what I studied before I got to med school. Given that a pedal at bottom center (which was the point of the article I quoted, to explain the 4 transitions of a pedal stroke which I verified you can at least read the abstract of from my link) is at a position with the crank arm perpendicular to the ground and the pedal is parallel, a force exerted by your leg onto the pedal will be parallel with the ground as well, creating a clockwise rotation. Also, since biomechanics do matter when pedaling, the only muscle that can exert this force is the shorthead of biceps femoris. The other 3 portions of the hamstring are lengthening at the hip while flexing at the knee, creating an isometric force which produces no changes in muscle length. So we're biomechanically limited to the SH of BF. Thus, we can only create a force with a FLAT foot (not pointing down, as needed to scoop up) that points in the direction of the chainstays.

Therefore, yes, you can't pull up. I've said this in every post. But you can pull backwards. Using SH of BF, you can move it about 20 degrees. To move it further to almost 90 degrees, you'd need to scoop. But at that point you're creating an upward force PERPENDICULAR to the chainstays and ground (you know, the way an upwards arrow points). I'm saying you pull back.
  • 6 0
 @conman1395: Lol, after all that, "pulling" backwards is a push you clown hahaha
  • 6 0
 @conman1395: Biomechanics obviously matter, the problem is that you clearly don't know how they apply. What you're calling a pull is quite obviously a push.
  • 5 0
 @conman1395: Nobody is disagreeing with you except that you obviously mean push and not pull. I really hope you're better at articulating yourself in medschool than you are on here. When I went to medschool we didn't learn pedalling mechanics, that sort of thing would come a lot later when specialising. But unless you're willing to identify yourself and prove you're in medschool somehow we can disregard that claim, as you can mine.
  • 4 0
 @conman1395: Oh what luck, you studied biomechanics and physics and are now in medschool. I wonder if you studied mechanical engineering on other threads about frame designs lol Wink STFU bud
  • 3 0
 @conman1395: Pulling back when pedalling is a push genius. Hope medschool goes well haha
  • 2 0
 Lol, the fastest way to get downvoted is to claim to have studied everything. One thing anyone actually studying learns very quickly is that the more you learn the more you realise you DON'T know.
  • 1 0
 @DJ-24: Lol that's the comment equivalent of "I know you are but what am I". I wasn't calling you a whiner I was calling Serpantras a whiner ya doofus - I AM calling you a doofus though Wink
  • 16 8
 Why do they all have to be so bulky looking. MTB shoes look ridiculous. 5.10 Sleuth’s are about the old ones I can wear because they semi resemble regular shoes. These are one step below a moto boot or moon boot.
  • 4 0
 Specialized 2fo roost. Closest grip wise to 5.10s, relatively affordable, lower profile, durable, good toe protection, and they come in regular colors.
  • 7 0
 These all look like Hoka running shoes
  • 1 0
 I miss my 5.10 Rennies...
  • 8 2
 Would you rather they looked like some siiick nikes but then every time you crashed you broke your toes? The mongoloids on this website will never cease to amaze me
  • 3 7
flag stubs179 (Mar 1, 2022 at 10:30) (Below Threshold)
 @Biologybossman: mongoloid?? I’m not the one wearing these clown shoes.
  • 4 1
 @stubs179: No you're the one bitching about how these shoes are designed for a specific purpose and their looks reflect that
  • 6 0
 Does it really matter what they look like? After a ride I'm taking those dirt infused sweat buckets off and putting on something dry and comfy. I view riding shoes much like ski boots: No sense wearing them a second longer than required.
  • 1 0
 @Biologybossman: not bitching. Just stating they look ridiculous and I wear Sleuth’s because they are normal sized.
  • 1 0
 Username checks out.
  • 2 0
 @stubs179: Sorry dude I was being a dick yesterday, it would be cool if the shoes looked a bit nicer but at the end of the day if we're only using them for riding it's not the end of the world
  • 9 2
 Switched to Ride Concepts after many years on 5.10. Made the switch due to the decline in quality when Adidas acquired them. I have the Hellcat for DH and love it. Narrower width for a women’s foot and comparable rubber to my old impacts. But I think a lot of grip comes to pedal compatibility too. It's also the stiffest sole I've ever ridden on! Plus, they're a real company with real people who answer their phones and emails when you have questions. This colorway is hideous though.
  • 3 0
 I'm always excited for more Boa shoes, especially flat pedal ones! Just hope that the stack height isn't too much.
Though, the flat pedal Tallac Boa is $190, which when compared to the $180 Stamp Boa flat and the $150 pearl izumi x-alp launch isn't that bad actually, more so when these seem better for hike-a-biking and whatnot.
It's safe to say that these are now top of the list for the replacement of my current Freeriders, as soon as the pedal pins finally go all the way through the shoe.
  • 1 0
 have you tried the scott sport volt boa? my feets love em!
  • 5 0
 Been using the live wire for 3 years, kickass shoes, still going strong. My five Ten free ride was finished in one year. Not RC
  • 3 0
 Why can't anyone measure and describe their lasts the way Shimano does. And why are so many product managers still designing shoes around outdated italian last designs. We don't need narrow pointy dress shoe tips, we don't need toe springs, and heel to toe drops. All these have been dispelled in modern sport physio research.
  • 3 0
 Does the patch on the Livewire’s remind anyone else of “Ollie patches” from many years back? The ones threat used the laces to attach…. Maybe it’s just my skateboard background Wink
  • 2 0
 You almost got signed to a PB contract, but then they realized you said skateboard instead of bmx.
  • 2 0
 I'm holding out for flats with a big toe box to fit my wide feet. A velcro strap or a Boa lace would also be nice. I have to take my shoes off to get my knee pads on and off. Since we're wishing.. I'd appreciate a comfortable pair of knee pads that I can put on and take off without removing my shoes.
  • 2 0
 From what I recall, Specialized does (or at least did) pair a generous toe box with a snug shoe. Have you tried those?
  • 1 0
 @vinay: I've tried their Rime, it was far too narrow. Ended up getting Freerider Pros instead
  • 1 0
 Shimano GR series fits my fat foot pretty good. The AM series for clips as well.
  • 7 3
 Not just aimed at RC, but please just stop with the BOA on mountain bike shoes. Velcro works better and works forever. Stop trying to jazz it up.
  • 5 1
 BOA: Breaks Off Always
  • 2 0
 Five ten Sam Hill edition are the shizz imo.i bought a Pair off ebay that were barely used a year ago and still have very little signs of wear to the sole or anywhere for that matter. They’re def more robust and just as tacky . I ride 5-6 days a week and the soles on the reg. freeriders (although sticky as hell) would tear and disintegrate every 5-6 months with one up pedals or any pedal w/decent pins. My only complaint w/sam hill would be the the heel rub but ended up using a grinder w/ a sanding pad to take a bit off the inside and they’re fine now. Definitely planning on a second backup/dry pair for summer b4 they change style or compound etc.
  • 3 0
 I just want a shoe with a protective toe box. Like a work boot - a nice semi hard plastic would be great. It's like trying to get a shark with frickin lasers on its head!
  • 3 0
 I’ve been riding their Powerline and Hellions the last few years, grippy and have taken a beating and still function great.
  • 1 0
 Really loved the original RC Transitions for a clipless (spd/cleat) shoe. Stiff sole, wide toe box, protective toe box, laces, inside ankle protection, laces and velcro strap at top. Unfortunately, I'm not seeing that combo available. Mike Levy just did the Enduro shoe review that almost hits those points, but per his report the sole isn't stiff. And FWIW- BOA systems on anything should not be trusted in remote locations, they fail and its not a good situation (any type of outdoor footwear, not just bike shoes).
  • 1 0
 Is the very first photo of a rider wearing waterproof socks? You know the pic with the riding pants/trousers way too short (never mind the short inseam issue, that ship has sailed). Regardless, if those are indeed waterproof socks, bravo!!! Someone knows what's up, waterproof the socks and not try to make waterproof shoes. Waterproof shoes are about as useful as buckets shaped for your feets.
  • 1 0
 I love my waterproof shoes. They're awesome. With waterproof socks and RC shoes, they still get waterlogged and need to be dried out.
  • 3 0
 We just had a damn poll about this. How hard is it for companies to put an entire lace flap covering ALL the laces back in their shoes. Karver, GR9. Bring it back.
  • 1 0
 Some great progress. RC does seem to be learning. I asked a few years ago about non-lace options and the response I got back was that I could use their sandals. The new tread changes are great, especially the heel and toe grip. Now just to add a waterproof option and at least inner ankle protection, and I might switch back to RC.
  • 1 0
 I ordered the Tallac for more hiking grip in loose hike-a-bike sections. It was noticeably more narrow than my 5-10s and felt like it would have a hotspots immediately if I actually rode them. I got two sizes and neither was as comfortable as my 5-10s. My feet are just slightly wider than average. They also had the strongest chemical off-gassing smell I've ever experienced. Really wanted to like these, but they're going back.
  • 2 0
 I hope some of my LBS start carrying them. Trying them on (and subsequently making an impulse purchase) is the way to get me using their shoes.
  • 4 0
 The best part about these 2022 shoes is I got 2021’s 50% off!
  • 2 0
 nice, just got my Hellion from 2021 with 40 bucks off. My first MTB shoe and I feel like I am glued to the pedal ( used to ride in regular trail runners )
  • 1 0
 Do any manufacturers make flats that drain excess water fast & manage not to hold water in the fabric? For rides with a lot of creek crossings.
  • 2 0
 Yep…Shimano SPD sandal Wink
  • 2 0
 I think the 5.10 Trailcross has water drains.
  • 3 0
 Helion Elite looks pretty good but why would I get this over FiveTen?
  • 4 2
 ....because the RC's are quality, and Five Tens are not. I made the switch two years ago to RC, and have not looked back at Five Shitty Ten's.
  • 2 0
 Because RC is owned and run by mountain bikers who care about the sport and culture, not a mega sports conglomerate. That means something to me, not to mention the product is as good or better in my opinion. Hellion clip is a rad addition.
  • 2 0
 What's the pirpouse of the bulky outersole in front of the toe cap? Also old sam hill fivetens had it.. never got why..
  • 1 0
 The width of the heel on that Talas looks massive, like a Hoka. Heel rub is real these days on many frames, so why make the heel so wide?
  • 2 1
 Sad that the only options for mountain bike shoes are those that make you look like you belong in a nursing home or the adult trying to look like a teen again.
  • 1 3
 Straight up special kid shoes.
  • 1 0
 I just got a pair of the RC Vice and these shoes are great! Comfortable, grip, firm sole and price. I would like to see a version of the the RC Vice Velcro straps.
  • 1 0
 Having destroyed one on a rock, is it too much to ask for the BOA (or similar) dial to be placed somewhere a little more protected like on the tongue?
  • 2 0
 Can anyone compare their grip to 5.10?
  • 3 0
 I have Helions, went there from Impacts.. Not as grippy and not as stiff... at least that should give you an idea.. the original Hellions have the mid grade grip sole. I kind of like the less grip.. its still very grippy but allows you to reset your foot on the pedal without having to release all the pressure from the pedal.. the Impacts were very very sticky that way.. once you had your foot on there, you had to lift your foot to reset your foot position
  • 1 0
 @MaxGuerette: Thanks man, I appreciate the details! Gives me a good idea of how they compare.
  • 3 0
 @bananowy: The hellions weren't grippy enough for me.. went back to my flogged out freerider pros
  • 3 0
 @Derekat: Thanks. I suspect I'd have the same experience judging from both your and the above answer. I'm in the moar grip is moar better camp so I'll probably stick to 5.10.
  • 3 0
 Love my RC shoes.
  • 3 1
 … now in stock at your local Zumiez
  • 1 0
 Only thing I look for with shoes is the higher inner ankle
Cuff, ankle bones and crank arms don’t mix !
  • 1 0
 Ohhh nice...More clipless option! Been hoping they would come out with a more "trail" clipless show and now they did
  • 3 1
 Is it possible to get a mtb shoe that doesn't look butt ugly?
  • 1 0
 I'll get a pair no problem.
  • 1 0
 are they wide are enough to fit EE width feet??
  • 1 0
 Here we go with the fruity colors.
  • 1 2
 Last years model wasn’t 90’s rap video enough. We are taking 2022 back to hip hop. These are all facking terrible.
  • 1 1
 Why does anyone want to wear these clown shoes?
  • 1 3
 Wow these all look terrible to me. That suede type material seems like a really bad choice for mtb.
  • 1 2
 looking like the good ol' 5.10







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.060870
Mobile Version of Website