Sam and Bam check out the new ride.Add Sam Hill to the list of World Cup DH racers who are making the switch to 27.5” wheels. That list continues to grow, and we're already looking forward towards next year, when wheel size is no longer worth mentioning and frame designers can change their focus to more groundbreaking developments. But back to Sam Hill. Sam rode a customized Nukeproof Mega equipped with the mid-sized wheels at the first race of the season in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, but at this past weekend's BDS race in Fort William, Scotland, he rolled up to the starting line on a 27.5” version of the
Pulse DH bike. Although the bike had been hinted at a few months ago, this marks its race day debut. The overall layout of the frame remains the same, save for the geometry, which will have been altered to fit the slightly larger wheels. Sam finished in seventh place on the new ride, a result that he'll no doubt be itching to improve when the World Cup returns to Fort William in a few short weeks.
Wheel size has been the fuel for countless fiery internet debates over the last year or so, but racers seem to be accepting the change and moving on. Most of the larger teams have made the switch, with the Santa Cruz Syndicate being the most notable exception. Will a 27.5" V10 debut at Fort William? We'll just have to wait and see. It's also worth noting that the first two World Cup races of the season have been won by riders on 27.5" wheeled bikes, and at Cairns three out of the five podium positions were held by riders aboard non-26" bikes. Granted, Gee Atherton and Aaron Gwin could probably win on a Schwinn Stingray, banana seat and all if they really wanted to, but it is an indication of the changing times.
I have, on DH bikes and trail bikes. The difference is rather large, and makes for a waaaaaaay more forgiving ride. Mostly due to the BB drop in relation to the axles and the larger contact patch. You can corner so much harder.
Sorry to tell ya, but 26 is dead.
1) Aside from new colors every few years, what new stuff is there for companies to sell? Companies in any market make money by "innovating"- even if it is forced innovation. People want to buy new shit, regardless of whether they really need to or not. Basic economic strategy.
2) Bike companies also don't really give a shit what the informed, seasoned riders have to say because they know they can sell to the novices/dumbasses of the sport.
3) Some people who have tried all 3 actually prefer the bigger sizes.
4) It can also be argued that they do have some sort of an advantage.
Point #1, #3 you have a valid points.
#2 is really unfortunately very true.
But #4 the advantage is mostly for racers. Why "mountain bike" if you want it smoother.
I don't mind the innovation factor, I just want the 26" wheel to continue to follow the innovations. I have tried all 3. I'm a shorter guy so the 29er really felt wrong. Maybe just me but.... 27.5 was ok. cant say i really noticed a difference but I'm into steep technical trails. Smoothing it out takes away from "my" fun. I guess I just want what I want and the companies want $$$$$ by selling new shinny things.
I honestly don't see why all 3 can't exist in harmony; I have extensively ridden both 29 and 26 and I also own one of both. 29 is for trail riding and racing, 26 is for DJ and just generally having fun on a bike. 650b also has its place, as something that can give you a little bit more speed but not sacrificing as much agility and fun as a 26er, but I haven't really spent much time on one so I can't say for sure.
Thanks stinkbike, for helping to make my bikes obsolete.
"but racers seem to be accepting the change and moving on"
As you would too if it was paying the mortgage.
I will say that climbing I didn't notice a difference in wheel size. I noticed a difference in my Rune being Al/1x10 and the Intense being carbon/2x10. At this point, I'm not for or against 27.5....I won't, however, being selling my 26 Rune tomorrow to pick up a 27.5.
My "dick about it choice" is 26 bonerific inches
What about a Demo? Fort Bill world cup should be interesting, we'll finally have an answer to the question everyone is askin themselves: "is it the Demo or was Gwin having a bad year?"
You seem to forget that Sam Hill won ONE world cup series race on a Demo. I'll say that again... The Demo has won ONE race on the world cup DH series.
Sam HIll won the overall in 2009 aboard the Demo, taking 1st at Mt Sainte Anne AND Schladming in the process. TWO wins and the overall in 2009.
In 2010 he won World Champs on the Demo at Mt Sainte Anne coming off injury. Technically not a "world cup DH series" race, but against essentially the same competition.
100% wrong. Sorry though. You take winners, and put them on the Demo and they can't win. That proves that the while the racer is still more important, the bike underneath the racer piloting it, has to be able to keep up with the other bikes. And the demo can't.
@alexisfire, take a lesson from six66. the logic in your argument was disproven by thousands of years ago in Ancient Greece.
"the logic in your argument was disproven by thousands of years ago in Ancient Greece".
I like how PB comment board evolves... :slow clap:
You do realize that the large Session has a longer wheelbase than the large Demo?
And I didn't even take in consideration the fact that there is a XL Session available but not an XL Demo.
Now we need more bikes w/forward geo ala kona, gt, yeti, mondraker,...
Large tt should be 24.5ish/reach @18/chainstays 17 or less. Thanks
Some of us are not content with merely being a passenger on the bike, we like to get after it, and with shorter legs, bigger wheels get in the way.
Theres no arguing bigger wheels grip better though!
I've had the same frames for 3 years straight with every years big new improvement on it. This years 650B is absolutely killing it.
650B > 559
Ride one and you will agree, i will grantee it.
"I am riding the 29" Ripley because it's our newest bike and we want it to get exposure."
Racers Only accept "change" that they can deposit in their bank account.
Am I really reading it?! 14th may is now sacred.
Anyways, cool looking bike.
no, they couldn't. this type of statement is old, tired and stupid no matter which names you throw in there.
"Add Sam Hill to the list of World Cup DH racers who are making the switch to 27.5” wheels. That list continues to grow, and we're already looking forward towards next year, when wheel size is no longer worth mentioning and frame designers can change their focus to more groundbreaking developments."
Really!?!? Well of course he is switching, he gets paid to do that!!!! All these racers represent bike brands PEOPLE!!! What do you think they are going to do, say NO???
Groundbreaking developments??? You guys make me laugh! Who is paying you guys for all these reports on how good 27.5's are?? Mom let me see.....
Be real people, they tried 29's for Downhill saying all this great stuff about it, but now they are like, no we were wrong. Groundbreaking developments!!! PLEASE.
HAHAHAHHAHAAAAAAAAA!
Look at that another way. At Cairns 2 of the 5 podium positions (40%) were held by a now apparantly obsolete wheelsize that made up about 2% of the protected riders field. Josh Bryceland has been placing very well this year compared to previous years. The only change made? He's still on 26", pretty much everyone else is on 27.5"
If that doesn't make 26" look like the better option, then I don't know what does.
Besides the well understood relationship between wheel size and certain features of suspension bike geometry there is a less well understood relationship between (rear) wheel size, (rear) wheel path and travel. Larger wheels lose some of their attraction as travel is increased - wheel path starts looking less and less optimal compared to smaller wheeled bikes. 27.5in will probably be very good between 150mm and 200mm travel. 26in remains a viable choice for bikes with even greater travel than that.
GROUNDBREAKING? How so? How is "The overall layout of the frame remains the same, save for the geometry, which will have been altered to fit the slightly larger wheels." groundbreaking? Please indicated some other groundbreaking tech that has been unveiled by 650...
"Wheel size has been the fuel for countless fiery internet debates over the last year or so, but racers seem to be accepting the change and moving on." -- What choice do they really have? If a company's marketing dept says they're going 650 - input from a DH racer is not going to sway them to stay with 26". Please indicated where (in the case of a company moving their line up to 650b) the DH racer has a choice...
"It's also worth noting that the first two World Cup races of the season have been won by riders on 27.5" wheeled bikes"
-- And it's also worth noting that the EWS last year was won on a 26", while racing against many 650s. But that's a fluke, or he could have won on a Stingray, right?
Honest, I don't have anything against the wheel size other than the industry/media push to the masses as something it's not - other than new. I'll probably end up riding one in another year or so, and will do so happily.
I agree, wheel size is not groundbreaking.
My main gripe is lowered re-sale value of my 26" parts. I couldn't care less if I had the latest or greatest.
Get off your high horses, or SUV's or w/e
i.wp.pl/a/f/jpeg/33207/cqy5kudtnw1pcbahixli.jpeg
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJ5Sn38NYGA
with that said, im in the process of building up a trek fuel thats 26", i couldnt be more stoked.. i dont give a damn about wheel sizing, i just wanna ride my bike!