Shred Short Stack Helmet - Review

May 30, 2016
by David Arthur  
Shred Short Stack Helmet


Shred Optics started out as a snow sports eyewear and protection company born in 2006, co-founded by Olympic alpine skier Ted Ligety. The company has since expanded to include plenty of mountain biking products, including the Short Stack mountain bike helmet pictured here.

It’s clear that safety is paramount for Shred, and the helmet packs some interesting technology designed to provide extra protection in the event of a crash. The helmet is constructed with a co-molded NoShock 2nd Skin XT, the company’s own special honeycomb foam that offers similar deformable and energy absorption properties to D3O. It’s embedded into key areas of the helmet lining. You can see the NoShock foam integrated into the EPS foam because it is handily colored blue.

The shape of the helmet echoes that of other popular trail helmets - with a lowered rear section to provide extra protection to the back of the skull - but sticking to a well-proven shape is no bad thing. There are 20 vents, with four channels across the top of the head, and some very larger rear vents. The retention system is operated by a small ratcheting dial, and the chin straps emerge directly out of the side of the helmet, placing them away from the skin to increase comfort. There’s a non-adjustable peak, and the helmet is lined with X-Static pads that are removable for washing.

Further highlighting its quest for safety, Shred includes an ICEdot emergency identification and notification ID with each helmet. You just need to go to the website and register it using the code revealed by peeling back the sticker. The ICEdot website can store emergency contacts and medical details like blood type, medications and allergies, a useful thing especially if you ride solo a lot. The Short Stack is available in two sizes: X-small/medium and medium/X-large (the XS/M tested here covers sizes from 53 to 57cm) and in six colors. MSRP is $159.
Details:
• Intended use: trail/enduro
• Co-molded NoShock 2nd Skin XT
• Twenty vents
• Rotary retention system
• X-Static Silver Fiber pads
• CE, CPSC certified
• Sizes: XS/M, M/XL
• Weight: 315 grams (XS/M)
• MSRP: $159 USD,
• Contact: Shred Optics / @ShredOptics


Shred Short Stack Helmet
The ratcheting retention dial provides a wide range of adjustment.


Shred Short Stack Helmet
It's a smart looking helmet, with 20 vents and fixed peak.


Performance

Shred offers the Short Stack in a choice of two sizes. I went for the medium and it fitted my average shaped head well, and the easy-to-use retention system offers a wide range of adjustment. Despite being my normal size, I found the helmet a closer fit than similar sized helmets from Fox and Poc, but the closeness of the fit never led to any undue pressure. On the flip-side, the helmet was extremely stable on my head, with absolutely no fore or aft movement.

The chin straps come directly out of the side of the helmet, keeping them away from the skin and minimizing irritation, and that also means there’s no interference when wearing sunglasses. The plastic brackets fixing the straps together aren’t adjustable, but they sat just below my ears without causing any discomfort. I usually lament the lack of adjustability in a fixed-position peak, but Shred has got the angle just right, as it never obscured vision and I never felt the need to adjust it.

Shred Short Stack Helmet
Blue NoShock 2nd Skin XT material is molded into the EPS liner.
Shred Short Stack Helmet
You get an ICEdot ID included in the price of the helmet.


The NoShock foam embedded into the helmet is designed to provide added impact protection, working in unison with the EPS foam that makes up the majority of the helmet's construction. It’s only used in key places inside the helmet, presumably where Shred has tested and decided there are the high-risk areas. While the helmet passes the usual EN 1078 and CSPC safety standards, there’s no available data on how much the technology helps to reduce the severity and force of an impact compared to a helmet without the special foam, and I’m not willing to throw my head at a rock garden to find out if it’s any safer for you. We’ll just have to take the company’s word for it, with a pinch of salt.

The only issue I had with the helmet is that, while it breathes adequately, the brow pad doesn’t manage sweat very well and becomes quickly saturated. It just held onto the sweat and slowly released it down my face, usually just before I dropped into a steep and tricky section of trail. If this was a problem in the barely mild weather of the UK spring, I hesitate to imagine what it might be like in the high heat of summer. I put this sweating issue down to the close fit of the helmet. Luckily, the pads are removable, so you can toss them in the washing machine.


Pinkbike's Take:
bigquotesShred might not be a better-known company in this market, but with the Short Stack, it may soon be. It has produced a smart looking and comfortable helmet - one that is keenly focused on safety, with the smart integration of the NoShock foam cells and the addition of an ICEdot ID included in the price. If you don't have issues with sweat, the Short Stack is a worthy alternative to the more common helmet choices. - David Arthur



Visit the high-res gallery for more images from this review.





Must Read This Week

51 Comments

  • + 31
 Their brain buckets are quite good. Got one for my buddy and he hasn't died despite all his crazy bails
  • + 4
 Finally Shredz is into MTB industry. Next you'll see every Aaron Gwin photos there will be Shredz shaker beside.
  • - 1
 @chyu: ted ligety can stop the coattail riding and stick with what he knows.............

wacked out ski shizz.
  • + 1
 I've got this exact helmet and love it. Light, comfortable and looks pretty rad accompanied by some green tint goggles.
  • + 18
 Would have been dope to have seen a shot of it from the front. Looks like a good lookin' lid though.
  • + 7
 cdn.velonews.competitor.com/files/2015/04/IMG_1522.jpg

Not on a head, but better than nothing.
  • + 33
 Seriously. A helmet review without photos of how it looks on a guy from the side and the front seems very incomplete.
  • + 11
 Pinkbike has a phobia of showing faces in any of their reviews
  • + 1
 I agree, i'm liking the looks of this one
  • + 10
 Looks good... id prob buy it if they were charging $300 plus
  • + 8
 It kinda looks like a Fox Flux, minus the spoiler
  • + 2
 Was thinking the exact same thing
  • + 5
 The spoiler is the best part of the flux..m
  • + 10
 @j-t-g: I've always found the spoiler essential for giving me the extra down force I need in the corners.. Wink
  • + 5
 Is something that hardens on impact? (D30 type materials) a good idea
In a helmet?
  • + 2
 I was wondering that too. I'd also worry that people might think this helmet is ok to continue using after a crash if it has the D30 type material.
  • + 1
 the other issue is the temperature. lately in a knee-pad review some people stated that in low temp the foam is hard and does not provide the same amount of shock absorbing. This allready hurts my head just thinking of it. Would be interesting if shred has something better as they startet with snow-sports?
  • + 2
 @squarewheel: ha yeah that was me. I have the dianese trail pads an they're a lot stiffer in the uk cold
  • + 0
 Yes it is because the hard peice compress a greater area of foam is the same crash.
  • + 3
 First ive heard about the ICEdot thing. Sounds like a good idea if others know to access it in an emergency! ??
Nice plain simple looking lid! Far cry from the new Troy Lee vomit inducing bucket
  • + 1
 i don't mind paying good money to protect my head from injury, i do object to paying out for the industry standard crap foam linings that don't last 6 months, held together by velcro and double sided tape, cheap and nasty and overpriced
  • + 2
 At 39 years of age I'm to old to be wearing anything with the word 'Shred' on it. Probably cool if your 12 or you can actually shred.
  • + 11
 Just imagine it means shredding papers in the shredder next to your cubicle.
  • + 1
 @Pedro404:

haha ready to wipe my arse with.
  • + 1
 I really like this idea, definitely a top contender for my next helmet. Price is reasonable as well, was expecting much more.
  • + 3
 i dont want my helmet to say "shred" on it.
  • + 1
 if you cut the 'r' out it will say 'sh ed'
  • + 0
 $159 is pretty reasonable for a good bucket

It's not like they have to pay engineers to ensure their designs are structurally sound and adhere to legal standards.

Just the materials play into cost.... :rolls eyes:
  • + 2
 Just looks like your average helmet. Nothing special
  • + 1
 ICEdot is the pinnacle of a mom invention. I could see my mom inventing that.
  • + 1
 Wow this is rad! I'm sharing this with the MTB community on www.soulid.me asap!
  • + 1
 I felt this was lacking in photos. Hard to get an idea for what this lid looks like with the pics provided.
  • + 2
 peep the link at the bottom of the article and just above the ads :p
  • + 1
 Ted Shred is the man. Awesome skier.
  • + 1
 Visor looks too short. Isn't going to block sun low on the horizon.
  • - 3
 What is going on with the Industry? How come no new helmet "standards" .We have got thousands of wheel size/width "standards" and millions of confusing hub size "standards". Looks like they are missing out on helmets....im dissapointed.
  • + 0
 Too much $, for one crash throw away
  • + 1
 Really? $159usd is priced favourably compared to a lot of the AM style helmets currently for sale from the major helmet manufacturers.
Helmets are one thing I'm happy paying my hard earned on, given that they might save my life, or at the least save me from some serious head trauma.
  • + 2
 @Kiwiplague: It's understandable to pay extra for protection, but the markup on helmets are ridiculous. It costs a couple of dollars to make this, and then almost a 10,000% markup! Many of these helmets go on sale, and the price drops to around $30. In that $30 the bike shop is profiting, the whole sale vendors are profiting, and the companies making the product are profiting. It's insane to pay $159 for this helmet.
  • + 6
 BECAUSE it is so important it should cost less..... to encourage people to replace their helmets frequently
  • + 1
 its protecting your brain, not your wallet
  • + 1
 @Kiwiplague: I do not think that you need to spend 160 dollars for a helmet that do its work right. I think that there is a point in price where helmets just get expensive for others reason that are not neccesary better protection. A cheaper idea to save your life or avoid injuries is to imagine that you are not using a helmet so you do not take more risks than normally, wich you would take if you have an expensive helmet in your head.
  • + 1
 Too many acronyms
  • - 2
 Perfect rowdy helmet. Fuck enduro, freeride on trailbikes
Below threshold threads are hidden

Post a Comment



Copyright © 2000 - 2017. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.055575
Mobile Version of Website