First Look
Specialized
Stumppumper
Concept Bike
WORDS Mike Levy
The popularity of pump tracks has skyrocketed over the last few years, with more and more of them popping up in not only backyards, but also at major events around the world. While banging out laps on a pump track is a great time, it doesn't take much for it to turn into a competition of sorts; inevitably the stop watches come out and riders are battling each other for the fast lap times. That, of course, quickly led to ever advancing pump tracks that grew is size and difficulty. What hasn't evolved much, though, is the bikes being used. Show up at any track, be it a local hidden gem or a world class monster like the one at last year's Kokanee Crankworx, and you'll likely see the majority of riders on their dirt jump bikes. But what if someone put some time and resources towards assembling a purpose built pump track weapon that is designed solely to rail berms and pump rollers? Specialized's Jason Chamberlain did just that when he set out to build the ultimate pump track bike. Behold the Stumppumper.
Focused intention: Chamberlain is well aware that the Stumppumper concept is a single minded approach to a niche aspect of our sport, but that didn't stop him from exploring the idea of a purpose built pump track bike. It's from exercises like these that he and Specialized learn about what works and what doesn't, and Chamberlain knows that what works on a pump track is the BMX approach. "
It occurred to me that most pump track guys simply ride dirt jump bikes that are far from optimal," Chamberlain explains "
If you want to go fast, then you need to look at BMX bikes, so that is where I drew inspiration. Rigid, stiff wheels, and light weight". The finished bike, weighing in at just 17.9lbs and using a rigid carbon fiber fork, reflects the single minded approach to looking for the fastest possible lap time. No, this is not going to be a bike for everyone.
 | The Stumppumper is intended for advanced riders only - it's fast, and twitchy like an F1 car. It's ultralight so it gets up to speed quicker, but may not hold momentum as well as a heavier bike. - Jason Chamberlain |
Offset cranks: Carrying speed through a pump track's rollers and berms is key to a fast time, a feat that is always going to be easier to do on a bike with a low center of gravity. A ground scraping bottom bracket height is crucial to having a low CoG, but you'll never find an extremely low BB height on a bike that has been designed to excel at other types of riding. For example, a dirt jump bike will typically spin easier in the air if it uses a slightly higher BB, while a true mountain bike must also take pedalling clearance into consideration - neither fact making for an ideal, super low BB pump track setup. Chamberlain wanted to assemble the Stumppumper around a stock Specialized P.3 frame that uses 26'' wheels, but that would mean that the bike would use a rather mundane 301mm (
11.8'') bottom bracket height.
The answer came to him in the form of installing the crank arms in an offset configuration, effectively lowering the bike's bottom bracket height by 22mm. The crank arms literally hanging down, or droop, from the BB spindle when at the 3 and 9 o'clock position. The result is an
effective bottom bracket height of just 279mm (
10.9''), nearly a full inch lower than the stock number. While the obvious benefit is the lower CoG, the offset configuration should also help to keep the arms from wanting to rotate as the rider makes their way around the track, likely relieving fatigue. Chamberlain claims that another advantage is the "
balancing effect that the offset cranks have on your left and right legs, which stabilizes your body under high cornering Gs." While it may sound odd at first to run such a setup, one has to remember the Stumppumper is intended to spend its life on a pump track and nowhere else. "
There is no drawback since tracks are smooth and you aren't turning your cranks - you don't risk clipping a pedal," Chamberlain explains when I questioned him as to if the Stumppumper's drooped cranks give it an odd sensation when pedalling. The drooped crank arms mean that they have to be set up for either left or right foot forward riders, otherwise the cranks will be angled up, defeating the purpose of the offset layout.
Specifications
|
Release Date
|
2012 |
|
Price
|
|
|
Fork |
White Brothers Rock Solid Carbon Fork |
|
Crankarms |
Specialized Carbon BB30 w/ Home Brewed Components custom 25t chainring |
|
Bottom Bracket |
Zipp Ceramic BB adapter cups |
|
Pedals |
Specialized |
|
Handlebar |
Specialized Carbon Enduro |
|
Grips |
ESI Silicone Foam |
|
Brakes |
Avid XX World Cup w/Shimano ICE 140mm rotor (rear only) |
|
Hubs |
DT road front hub (wide flanges), DT Single Speed rear hub (wide flanges) |
|
Spokes |
32x 1.6/1.8 spokes with spoke head washers (preferred with 1.8 elbows) |
|
Rim |
DT EX500 |
|
Tires |
Specialized Renegade 2.3, Control Casing |
|
| |
Light, stiff build: While the Stumppumper's components are, for the most part, readily available to any consumer, Chamberlain has carefully chosen the bike's spec with its intended purpose in mind. The most obvious difference between this machine and a common dirt jump bike is the lack of front suspension, with the front of the concept bike sporting a White Brothers Rock Solid Carbon fork. The sub-900 gram fork employs 34mm diameter carbon legs that are bonded to an aluminum crown and dropouts. White Bothers offers two axle to crown length options to preserve the bike's handling, a short 425mm or 445mm length that simulates a suspension fork under sag, with Jason opting for the longer choice to keep the Stumppumper handling as intended.
After talking to Chamberlain about the project earlier in the season we had fully expected the finished bike to come complete with a carbon rimmed wheelset, but that isn't the case. The Specialized Renegade 2.3 Control Casing tires are inflated quite high for maximum rolling speed, so he chose to build the wheels with a set of DT's EX500 rims because they are more suitable for high pressures. A DT road hub is employed up front due to its wider spoke flanges that should improve wheel stiffness, while a wide flanged single speed DT hub is used out back. Chamberlain even took the extra time to use brass washers a the elbows of the 1.6/1.8 spokes, a recommended step when using the smaller size spokes in standard 2.0 flange holes.
The bike's drivetrain is about as exotic as a single single speed can get, especially considering that it isn't intended to be pedalled much. A set of Specialized's BB30 compatible S-Works Carbon crank arms are fitted up in the previously mentioned offset postion to imitate a lower bottom bracket height, and a custom made Homebrewed Components 25 tooth chain ring is slid onto the crank's spline in place of the stock spider. Light and simple, just like the rest of the bike.
Form follows function, and the function of the P.3 Stumppumper is to be simple, light, and fast as hell. That's why you'll find a set of ESI's 50 gram Silicone non-locking grips on the Specialized Carbon Enduro handlebar, a favorite choice of riders in the know. The pairing of Avid's top of the line XX World Cup brake with a 140mm Shimano ICE rotor (
the DT 240 Single Speed hub uses Center Lock rotor mounting) may seem underwhelming at first, but remember that the brake is likely only going to be used to slow down at the end of your run.
Chamberlain and Specialized are well aware that the Stumppumper is about as a specific tool for the job as one can get. "
It's a bit of a tough sell because it is so different. I am certain that it is faster in the hands of a rider who can capitalize on the design, though," Chamberlain continues "
However, most guys are going to be more comfortable with what they are used to".
In short, it's unlikely such a bike would ever be made available as a complete package. But that's not to say that a dedicated pump track rider couldn't build up his own version, given that both the P.3 frame and all of the components are production items. The chances of you seeing sub-20lb pump track bikes that use offset crank arms at your local track are pretty slim, but I wouldn't bet against seeing Troy Brosnan or Sam Hill aboard such a machine come Crankworx time.
www.specialized.comPhotos by Ryan Cleek
250 Comments
Also, if I was in charge of building this bike it would have KHE mac2 tires. Shave a bit more weight. The knobblies are unnecessary...
if you take a look @ bmx racing/parts. Many parts and/or frames have rider weight limits because they are so light and they are like that for one reason, to go fast.
and like was said in the article, were i to have the cash, i could go over to my local bike shop and have one of these spec'd out with in 1-2 hours. The parts are out there, just need the coin to pay for them all.
Seriously if you guys were in charge, we'd still all be running triple cranks on rediculously heavy freeride bikes with sh*t suspension design and sh*t tyres and f*cked shocks and forks.
The point being all of these "NEW", "CONCEPT" designs are there to make the bike industry more accessible and easier to make use of. IT MAKES BIKES BETTER! TRICKLE DOWN!!!! All of these kinds of tech will be available in 5 to 10 years at an affordable level and you won't be complaining about it then! This is why Shimano (for example) will be releasing shadow plus into their lower level groups in the next couple of years - so we don't all have to shell out £150 for a new derailleur!
Alternatively you can just bury your head in the sand and ride around on a 20 year old heavy as f00k steel XC frame (which will snap) with 15 gears, crap tyres and rims, canti lever brakes and no suspension. Enjoy.
Oh and Ninjanate, I'm not spoiled nor rich; have you seen my bike? (I don't smoke, I didn't go to parties every weekend, and I sold my 5D mkII with 3 L lenses) Everyone can make the kind of money to buy the most expensive bike, it's just about priorities and how much you're willing to do so.
Don't hate man.
We worked for our bikes and we know what they're worth. Kids may not do that, but it's not at puberty that you start thinking about what money is anyway... You just want the best stuff so you can impress your friends and get the prittiest chick.
Further improvements:
- Remove the chain and rear cog and make bb bearings run less smoothly so the crank arms dont spin as much.
- Make a frame without a seatpost and saddle
- run a short fork 400mm like on a trials bike and built a frame around it so you get the geometry you want. You'll end up with a REALLY unique bike instead of a tuned dirtjump bike which is what we have here...AND even lower weight
The reason most people use dirt jump bikes for pump tracks is because they're perfect for it. Pump tracks are built around the bikes, not the other way around (seeing as DJ bikes came before pump tracks did).
I actually inadvertently made an 'offset crank', I was just messing around, jumping an old BMX one day, and gradually twisted the one-peice crank about 20 degrees. It didn't ride half bad, in fact I didn't even notice immediately. Honestly. It's no big deal.
April fools day isn't until 2 months time!
I've ridden with bent cranks before and TBH I never found it an advantage.
Surely you should just be running a frame with a lower BB height or 24" wheels?
Right
www.specialized.com/us/en/bc/SBCBkModel.jsp?spid=39175&menuItemId=0
no wonder the thing that finally convinced him to sell it was taking it to a skatepark.
AHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!
If it's so cool then how come you can do it with nearly every crank ever made? Like square tapers or Profile BMX cranks? 48 settings - woohoo!
The reason no ones done it before is its a bloody stupid idea which is also known as an assembly error!
and chop the seat tube and drill the steerer.
Making a serious sport out of that is just killing the fun "factor"
A. It's a pump bike (I've never ridden pump tracks, but I assume they don't pedal)
B. Has anyone ever offset their cranks? I have (by about 3 splines on 48 spline cranks) for laughs, and at a certain part of the revolution, it becomes extremely hard to pedal.
So why put a drive train on it? Could've saved a lot more weight.
Funny that!
"normal" bikes with normal prices would be of more use for anybody
They've just mis-assembled the crankset (not lining up the cranks properly at 180 degrees on the splines) so that they point down at the 4 and 8 o'clock positions.
Bottom bracket is standard BB30 that you can buy in any store :-)
Basset Hound/Pitbull?
2009 Worlds was awesome!
Was this idea done when the designers were out to lunch?
www.pinkbike.com/photo/6428306
so the bikes gonna pedal like a pogo stick
BAHAHAHAHHA I just read about the offset cranks! I.e. he deliberately put the crank onto the spindle wrong.
What idiot had a brain fart and came up with that!?!
and also like green color on p3 frame)
And yes it uses the same tubing as the p series, do you really think he would go to all the trouble of designing and making new tubing for an impractical concept bike? Of course he's going to re-use parts, why make new ones when old ones will do the job.
* Transition is a fantastic company and by no means was i putting them down I only wanted to illustrate how people immediately judge a company based on it's size in the market, not what they are trying to do for the industry. Specialized has done more good for cycling than almost any other company, I've been to their headquarters in Morganhill and I can tell you they are all about the riders.
^ I did
Imagine if your cranks and pedals were stuck solid. If both pedals were above the bottom bracket would you feel more balanced or unstable? If both pedals were beneath the bottom bracket would you feel balanced or unstable? Above = less stable, below = more stable.
images.gizmag.com/gallery_lrg/2282_20080574240.jpg
I despair honestly. Next he'll be putting the forks on backwards to steepen the head angle or something.
P.S. I can't believe I got neg propped for saying that "offset cranks" don't actually exist, it's just an assembly error. Pinkbike makes me lol.