Decked out in a technical camouflage wrap utilizing their logo, Cube's new 29er looks plenty slack up front, but with may have a shorter reach than trends suggest it should have. No doubt, Greg and Nico had a lot to do with the design, so we can safely assume it's a proper-handling machine.
Fox Float X2 shock and 36 fork. The head angle looks to be in the 65-degree range.
It's a, gasp, front derailleur!. Shimano Di2 XTR drivetrain. The bottom bracket area looks absolutely massive, which indicates a press-fit BB 92 system could be in place.
It appears that there is no pivot at the rear dropout, but Cube designed the Horst-Link type pivot to blend seamlessly into the swingarm.
Schwalbe Magic Mary up front and Nobby Nic out back. DT Swiss EX 1501 aluminum rims with what appears to be a 25mm inner width.
No flip chips to adjust the geometry or shock rate, which indicates Cube got it right the first time. The seat tube is angled dramatically, presumably, to keep the chainstay shot and make room for ample wheel travel. we're guessing 160 millimeters on both ends.
It looks like it's a vinyl decal actually, but I agree that most companies' "prototype" color schemes often look better than their production offerings.
@seraph: I've always thought that all high-end model offerings should come with custom paint work. Paint work that the purchaser chooses or paint scheme. Who wants to spend that kind of money on a high-end top-end model and show up at the trail and see someone else on the exact same bike.
I mean, if you wanted to make a bike inconspicuous you'd just paint it black right? No one would look twice. No one. Even if you paid them. Or gave them beer. Or told them straight up that this was the latest Cube...
...oh hang on...they had to pretend it was worth hiding it to make it interesting to even put on PB...
Iwana (sic) call this paint job #TheTrump, cos the whole thing is just a big shouty distraction tactic from the fact that there's nothing meaningful happening!
I just watched the Martyn Ashton video which was awesome and very real. This is neither awesome nor real. The contrast leaves me feeling empty and a bit sick. Hence rants.
"paint job" actually looks like a full vinyl decal wrap if you look close. I wonder how much weight that added, and it brings to question whether or not they can actually pull of those graphics in a production run. Not hating at all, think it's pretty cool bike/I like the looks of it a lot.
Don't be silly. This is top secret stuff, photographed by an anonymous photographer using miniature equipment. PB style, that is. You see the height these pictures were taken from? So Ross Bell sneaks up to the Cube tent before the crack of... ehrm... coffee break. Then when no one is watching, he opens the zipper, out comes the 200mm lens of the Canon EOS 5D mark IV camera. A couple of quick shots and off he goes a again. The casual viewer may have thought he got merely excited.
We have already reached s point where bike marketing resembles the marketing of the auto-industrial complex. Now we get the teasers, the "spy shots" and the busy monochromatic camo paint finishes that supposedly thwart design theft.
Zzzz zzz. Boring shill. I thought mountain biking was better than this.
You look at the bike ridden by Greg Callaghan and gasp when you see a front mech? Don't hold your breath. He races bikes at top level, he doesn't care what the PB fashion police thinks.
@Fribour: I used to ride with a front mech (22t, 32t and bash guard) until summer 2016 or so. I actually quit using the granny half a year or so before that to check whether I'd miss it . The reason I quit using the front mech actually was that I wanted to run an oval (32t) front ring and these don't work with a front mech. I think the reason the front mech got so much hate is because people tried to run it with a trigger shifter. That doesn't work, you can never get it in the right position. Use a grip shift for the front mech instead. It gives you nine positions so you can always make the chain shift and you can also always make sure that it doesn't rub. This means that you'll sometimes adjust the front mech one click if you shift a long stretch through the cassette. Greg uses electronic shifting and I'm not sure whether that one automatically adjusts the front mech. I expect it does. So yeah, on the hardtail (I ride most of the time) I don't run a front mech anymore but on the fully I still run one with grip shift for the front and trigger for the rear mech. For a short while I tried grip shift for the rear as well but that doesn't work for me. I pedal standing most of the time and the grip shift really allows you to force the mech into position. I bent too many rear mechs just from shifting.
I haven't tried a chain device like e-thirteen dual ring security (DRS) but it might work too. Obviously the bash guard already prevents the chain from dropping from the largest ring.
@vinay: I currently have an e13 DRS (without bash guard) on my 2014 Trance, running XT mechanical, but only because it came stock on the bike. I don't have any problems with chain drop...
That said, I have never had problems with front mechs, neither rubbing nor dropping the chain. Maybe it helps that I learned how to shift with 2x5 on downtube friction shifters in the early 1980s, before ramped & pinned chainrings and clusters that let you get away with murder? I did find SRAM 9.0SL (from 2002, gripshift) a bit touchy, seemed to have really high spring tension and required backing off the power and pedalling slowly or it could thrown the chain off inboard on downshift, even with the limit screws adjusted as finely as possible. But I got used to it.
@vinay: Have an e13 DRS on my 2014 Trance, seems to work OK.
That said, I've never really had a problem with front derailleurs, probably helps that I got my first road bike with 2x5 with downtube friction shifters in about 1982. No ramps or pins or fancy tooth profiling in those days, modern drivetrains let us get away with murder. I did find my old SRAM 9.0 front derailleur took some getting used to, it had very high spring tension and would dump the chain off inboard if you didn't back right off the power and pedal slowly when downshifting.
Super short seat tube with lots of Dropper Post showing. Seems awkward like they didn't make a big enough frame for the riders. Or that the riders like the smaller frame better. Rude or Cody was riding a medium yeti at some point I think. Short wheelbase looks like too.
wo wo wo hold up a second tell me why cube has a digital camo look in urban black and grey? hhhmmmmm that is funny when my m16 has been digi black and grey for a yr now and i even have the matching stiching on my seat, matching race jersey and i was in line with remy in whistler who is with cube now.
You don't see a pivot at the rear dropouts? I do, on the chainstay right in front of the rear axle. It looks like it's got a fancy aluminum plug or cap over it.
say what ? "Canyon's new 29er looks plenty slack up front"... in know Canyon is implementing new bikes, but damn, this is a Cube Seems nice this one too
I dont think this bike really has a 2X front setup. How would the lower chain guide accommodate the downward shift? Much more likely that they are using the front derailleur as an upper chain guide, probably because there is no room, or ISCG tabs on the frame. Just guessing here, feel free to present a logical arguement.
Just give it up Shimano. You lost. Nobody cares about front derailleurs. Very, very few care about electronic shifting. Stop trying to make the market want the outdated stuff you are pushing out. It's 2017, get with the times.
The brake rotors are a phenomenal piece of kit though.
@mhoshal: I have one, but I don't love it. What I would love is a cheap reliable lightweight gearbox I could bolt onto any frame to replace all derailleurs. That's love.
@maxlombardy: double chainring is the new bottle cage. I'll have one with a 20/34. Ta.
...oh hang on...they had to pretend it was worth hiding it to make it interesting to even put on PB...
#LooksLikeSomeonePukedDigitalCamoOnASession...
I just watched the Martyn Ashton video which was awesome and very real. This is neither awesome nor real. The contrast leaves me feeling empty and a bit sick. Hence rants.
I wonder how much weight that added, and it brings to question whether or not they can actually pull of those graphics in a production run. Not hating at all, think it's pretty cool bike/I like the looks of it a lot.
Zzzz zzz. Boring shill. I thought mountain biking was better than this.
Pinkbike user: make a coil fork man!, one-by or die dude!, 30mm? So skinny dude!, 29ers suck!
I haven't tried a chain device like e-thirteen dual ring security (DRS) but it might work too. Obviously the bash guard already prevents the chain from dropping from the largest ring.
That said, I have never had problems with front mechs, neither rubbing nor dropping the chain. Maybe it helps that I learned how to shift with 2x5 on downtube friction shifters in the early 1980s, before ramped & pinned chainrings and clusters that let you get away with murder?
I did find SRAM 9.0SL (from 2002, gripshift) a bit touchy, seemed to have really high spring tension and required backing off the power and pedalling slowly or it could thrown the chain off inboard on downshift, even with the limit screws adjusted as finely as possible. But I got used to it.
That said, I've never really had a problem with front derailleurs, probably helps that I got my first road bike with 2x5 with downtube friction shifters in about 1982. No ramps or pins or fancy tooth profiling in those days, modern drivetrains let us get away with murder.
I did find my old SRAM 9.0 front derailleur took some getting used to, it had very high spring tension and would dump the chain off inboard if you didn't back right off the power and pedal slowly when downshifting.
More like "oooops, I dropped my hanky, would you mind picking it up for me you big man" *bats eyelashes* shots
What next 3x with steel granny?
www.mrpbike.com/2xguide
its a real 2x. Shame.
It has a double chain ring with a changer up front.
Shit, that's a bad example, she won that race.