EvergreenMTB - Support Improved Trails in Snohomish County Washington

Mar 30, 2017
by Patrick Walker  


Support Snohomish County's Master Plan with Improved Bike Trails in Lord Hill

Snohomish County is working on a 20-year Master Plan effort for Lord Hill Park—a 1463-acre park located between the communities of Everett, Snohomish, and Monroe. Evergreen‘s draft concept map and proposal creates a bike priority zone and improves the quality of existing trails for a much-improved rider experience—but we need your voice!

Evergreen’s proposal prepares this unique, multi-use park for future growth, reduces potential for trail user conflict, and sustainable redesigns and rebuilds present trails, reducing erosion and runoff in order to protect the park’s sensitive ecology.

Use this example form letter to express your support for Evergreen’s proposed trail network. Recent media reports about our proposal for Lord Hill has spurred some local residents to protest the master planning efforts. We need your help to show County Council and the Parks Department that you support their efforts.


Please email your comments this week (sample text below):

Tom Teigen, Tom.Teigen@snoco.org
Parks Director, Snohomish County Parks and Recreation

Amy Lucas, Amy.Lucas3@co.snohomish.wa.us
Senior Park Planner, Snohomish County Parks and Recreation

Nate Nehring, Nate.Nehring@snoco.org
District 1 (Stanwood, Arlington, Darrington, Marysville, Lake Stevens, Granite Falls)

Brian Sullivan, Brian.Sullivan@co.snohomish.wa.us
District 2 (Tulalip, Everett and Mukilteo) – Council Chair

Stephanie Wright, Stephanie.Wright@snoco.org
District 3 (Edmonds, Lynnwood, Woodway) – Council Vice Chair and Operations Committee Chair

Terry Ryan, Terry.Ryan@snoco.org
District 4 (Bothell, Brier, Mill Creek, Mountlake Terrace, Lynnwood)

Sam Low, Sam.Low@co.snohomish.wa.us
District 5 (Bothell, Monroe, Snohomish, Lake Stevens, Sultan, Gold Bar, Index) Lord Hill is in Mr. Low's District!

Dave Somers, Dave.Somers@co.snohomish.wa.us
County Executive


"Dear _________,

I’m writing to express support for the Department of Park and Recreation’s efforts to develop an updated Master Plan for Lord Hill Park, and for taking the initiative to create a 20-year vision for this well-loved multi-use park.

I strongly support the Parks Department and the Evergreen Mountain Bike Alliance’s (Evergreen) draft proposal to include recreational priority zones within the park, and to provide user-specific trail networks to improve the recreational experience for all park users.

Evergreen’s proposed concept map reroutes and rebuilds poorly designed informal trails into a well-connected and easy-to-navigate trail network. It focuses on concentrating bike use in the NW section of the park to reduce user conflict that could arise from increased park usership over the next 20 years. The plan also ensures that trails are more sustainably built with better drainage and erosion control.

I strongly believe that this master plan effort is needed to prepare the park for sustainable future use, to repair currently unsustainable or wet trails, and to best cater to increasing multiuse events.

I have been following recent media about community concerns. My understanding is that the Master Plan will actually protect the park’s ecology, habitat, and user experience over the next 20 years and that it will prevent the user conflict and unsustainable trail design issues raised in the media.

Evergreen’s plan to design and build bike-specific trails for various rider levels and styles will ensure that Snohomish County mountain bikers can enjoy this park for years to come. Including some directional bike-only trails allows for advanced riders to safely enjoy a downhill trail without the worry of hikers or equestrians (and vice versa) thereby eliminating user conflict. All other multi-use trails within bike-priority zone would be multi-use and built with good line of sight to avoid user conflict. Evergreen also supports the equestrian priority zone as proposed by local equestrians.

Mountain biking is growing fast. If the County does not prepare a well-balanced plan, additional riders will continue to visit Lord Hill and venture out on trails that are increasingly busy and not designed to handle that heightened use. This growth could increase erosion, runoff, as well as user conflict in the future. The current draft plan will ensure this doesn’t happen.

In my personal opinion, Evergreen is collaborating to help protect the park’s equestrian history and has proposed a balanced solution given the current lack of mountain bike trails in Snohomish County.

Thank you for helping to preserve and protect the County’s park.

Sincerely,"


Posted In:
Press Releases


Author Info:
evergreenmountainbikealliance avatar

Member since Jul 29, 2014
71 articles
Report
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

10 Comments
  • 6 0
 Lord Hill is a big park with a good amount of elevation and a ton of potential. Unfortunately most of the trails are pretty beat, overgrown and slow. It's also pretty popular with equestrians who ignore the "bike-only" trail signs and end up destroying the remaining decent trails. This would be awesome to see some upgrades! Working on my letter now.
  • 3 0
 I love these trails, and ride Lord Hill twice a week. I have two concerns with Evergreen's plans I hope someone will address on here. First: the reason the trails are so good is that they still have soft black dirt on them. It's the access roads, not the trails, that have drainage problems, IMO. It seems EMBA's MO is to scrape off all the loam and create a hardpack trail in the name of drainage. Please don't shovel away our awesome dirt! Second: It could just be the way I read this, but it sounds like you want to constrain mountain bikers to one corner of the park. It's a small park, and it's nice to be able to traverse the whole property for the sake of getting a good, long ride in. Going round and round in short circles can get old after a while.
  • 1 0
 Good comments! I'm privy to some of the backstory on this. The original plan had a much larger expansion of mountain bike trails in it, developed in several hundred acres of undeveloped land within the park. That has since been given to the equestrians and the trails for mountain biking are to be more oriented towards improving drainage of natural trails, similar to what they are now. This is solely the decision of the park managers, not Evergreen. So you know who to talk to about your thoughts.

Evergreen knows well how many people live in Snohomish County and how little trails there are for mountain biking and is advocating for an improvement and small expansion of trails at Lord Hill.

From your perspective, can you list off which existing trails should largely remain untouched?
  • 3 0
 One of my worst experiences on a mountain bike was at Lord Hill Park. Middle of summer 6 years ago came around the corner on a "mountain bike only" trail at 9 PM and there was a horse and rider, horse immediately spooks, 80-year-old woman with a helmet got thrown in the air and ends up having to be airlifted out. An absolutely horrifying thing to see. A person with her swearing up a storm at me and the horse nearly tramples me and flees the scene. All the while I am apologizing profusely and trying to help however I can while being told that I have already "done enough" and to just leave.
It forever changed the way I feel about any park that shares bikes and equestrians.
I have friends that ride horses and have similar passion with their sport as I do with mountain bikes. Nothing against equestrians but everything against trying to build an area where both passions habitat.
Just my $.02, Long live Duthie.
  • 2 0
 And on that note, I think everyone agrees that multi use trails are ok in the backcountry where we do not cross paths that often, however at Lord Hill, trails should be segregated by use. (hikers being the exception)
  • 3 0
 I rode Dirt Bikes for years and out of sake of time and convenience switched to MTB'ing; way more opportunities for riding closer to home.
My worst interactions on multi-use trails were always with Horse Riders save for 1 excellent interaction North of Ellensburg, WA. The guys I rode with all had a strict policy of killing the engines and dragging the bikes as far off the trail as soon as we saw horses. We always got the death glare from all of the riders. The worst interaction was one spill I had that resulted in me tearing my meniscus and being trail side for an hour or so until the Advil kicked in enough for me to limp myself and bike back to camp. We had several groups of horses pass within feet, not a single one said "Hello, hi, can we help?" etc.
On the other hand, whenever encountering MTBs on mixed-use trails it was always positive or at least neutral. We always gave right-away to up hill cyclists and exchanged hellos and went our separate ways.
I now live/work near Bridle Trails State Park and I can say that save for Duthie, no other group has ever got such special treatment as the horse riders that occasionally use that park.
  • 4 0
 My family and I are constantly there walking and riding. There is a ton of potential for upgrade and reclaimed trails and very friendly folks on bikes and horses!
  • 3 0
 I ride here all the time, and would love to see some sustainable development take place here. I'd be happy to help build trails at any point!
  • 4 0
 Done!
  • 4 0
 Emails sent!







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.051404
Mobile Version of Website