| I hope I have the rich person's problem of thinking 'which bike am I going to take today?' I think this is a rich person's problem, being able to choose your bike...—Cedric Gracia |
Every bike nerd has had that daydream, that conversation: What would your perfect garage have in it? How many bikes? Which disciplines? How would you build each one? It's a nice way to pass a little time, working each bike out, especially the ones that, when you're honest, you couldn't justify owning if you were being sensible. The old cliché for the perfect number of bikes is N+1, there is always another bike it would be nice to add. But what if the tables were turned the other way? Rather than an unexpected bonus or a lottery win, it's a tax bill or a lawsuit? What if you needed to sell them all, move quickly, streamline your life? If you had to cut them all but one, if N=1, which one would you keep?
I've been there. For a few years, my entire life had to fit into the boot of my car. I was bouncing around Europe, doing some guiding, some journalism and as much riding as I could. I had my base in Molini di Triora, but it was no good for the winter, the valley would be too cold, too miserable through the long, dark winter months. Once the season wrapped up it was time once more to pack, force it all into my poor, little Alfa Romeo and head on to the next stop. That last winter I relocated seven times, I think, sometimes just moving hut within the campsite I stayed at, other times it was more drastic. Either way, there was no room for more things, my life, my work and my bicycles had to fit into that car. Anything that wouldn't fit was for the chop.
These days I'm more settled, comfortable, even, and, in case you wondered, my bike collection currently stands at six right now but a mate was talking about trials bikes the other week, and I've always fancied having a go at track cycling... But life is fragile, things fall apart. Just because the going is good today, tomorrow is not promised.
It's this I tend to dwell on more than the big windfall. Maybe it's because I still don't quite believe that I'm making a living taking pictures of and writing about bikes, or maybe, as some helpful Instagram commenter remarked recently, "you really are a negative c*nt." Either way, what if, for whatever reason you had to sell up, pack up, shift your whole life tomorrow and there is only room for one bicycle? Which one would it be?
With the long climbs around where I live there is plenty of time to consider such matters as you winch yourself to the top, and recently I had a moment of clarity, although I suspect it's one that many of you will not like too much. If I had to get rid of all my bikes tomorrow and could only keep one, it would be my eMTB. Now before you start sharpening the pitchforks, it's not for the reason you think it is...
Before we go any further, and I'm sure there will be some sighs of relief when I say this, but I don't think my eMTB is better than my mountain bikes. For pure fun, I would keep my current Scott Spark – it's probably the best mountain bike I have ever owned. But, the question is not "which mountain bike would you keep?" There's an elephant in the room when we talk about mountain bikes. One that starts to echo with hypocrisy when we start talking about environmental concerns. There's an argument that a European-made alloy bike may be slightly more dolphin-friendly than my Taiwanese-made carbon bike(s), but it's marginal at best. The one thing that is left out of this discussion is that you don't actually need a mountain bike. Not in the living from day-to-day sense. Yes, I too would say that I need to ride, it keeps me sane, keeps me happy. Certainly, I have never been more miserable in this life than when I lived in Central London and couldn't ride my bike. But when we get down to nut-cutting time, a mountain bike is still a toy. And a toy, by definition, is not an essential item. Quite simply, if you're not using it to commute, nip to the shops or whatever, then you don't need it.
This is where my eMTB is different. The problem is that I'm lazy. When I was in my early 20s I didn't have a driving license. Living in a big city I just didn't think I needed one all that much. To get to work every day I would either take the bus or menace the local traffic on my 4X bike. And menace is the right word. On the road a 4X bike with a big gear will out accelerate almost everything off the lights, it will out-turn, out-brake and out-manoeuvre pretty much anything else on the road. Throw in a 23-year-old me, full of piss and vinegar and yeah, I was probably not a great commuter to have on the road with you. Then I got a girlfriend. She made it clear to me that she would not continue dating a man who did not have a car. This seemed reasonable, so I booked some lessons and got my driving test done. I promised myself that nothing would change once I got my car, I would keep riding to work every day. That, of course, was horseshit. Who wants to suffer their arse off in the cold each day when you could be nicely sat down in the warm with some good music in the speakers? The simple fact is that the car was so much easier to use for commuting that my bicycle became neglected as anything more than a toy. This is a roundabout way of saying that I'm just not the righteous guy in a hemp shirt who is going to crank his cargo bike up the mountain each morning to buy milk.
From where I live now it is about 3km into town, with some 20% ramps thrown in on the way home that quite frankly suck, even without a 10kg backpack. My eMTB is the first thing I have found that is less hassle than a car to nip to the shops. Ok, on the flat road bits a car is faster and the eMTB lags behind, but once you remove the constant bunfight that is parking, it's at least as quick, if not faster. You get a little, gentle exercise and have more fun. In fact, I have now worked out
a loop where I climb the mountain opposite, which only takes about 20 minutes on the eMTB, and sneak in a lap of the DH track on the way to the weekly market. A 30l backpack is plenty to carry the fruit and vegetables for a week, then stick it in turbo mode and cruise home. If I need pine cones for kindling, I grab the same backpack and head up the mountain. If I have a meeting in the next valley I grab a second battery and plan a route. Adding in that extra bit of fun to the practical stuff means that all of last year I did around 90% of my local mileage on the eMTB, while my car lay idle, which was a first for me. Maybe you're now asking why not get a moto in that case? Aside from the hassle of buying and storing fuel, servicing and parking, if you only have space for a single bike, then there certainly wouldn't be space for a moto. On top of that, a moto doesn't scratch the itch for me when I need to unwind. It is too different from a mountain bike to cut it for me. Too noisy, not a precise enough a tool on the trail, not to mention the fact that they are banned by law from my local trails. An eMTB, however, is close enough...
This is why I would keep my eMTB before my mountain bikes. It is practical, it gets my car off the road, which saves me money and one less car on the road makes the world a slightly better place in so many ways. When we get back to the environmental math, if you use your eMTB as your day-to-day runaround, I'd bet the sums start to look rather different. On top of all that, when I get to the trailhead, I can have about as much fun as I would on my other bikes, making it the one machine that I can use for the practical things, but also for the fun ones too. So yeah, my N=1 is my eMTB, what would yours be?
Just Read: "If I had to get rid of all my bikes tomorrow and could only keep one, it would be my eMTB"..................
Awesome in as they might be in a commuter application be smart about how and where you ride them just as any other toy.
That sums up the entire eMTB market.
That sums up the entire eMTB market.”
And that sums up the ignorance of eMTB hate
It's called laughter
Lazy people exist, eMTB's cater to some of them. I met one this morning on the trails. I didn't feel the need to say anything or berate him. We were enjoying the same trails and he was friendly enough.
But I'm lazy in other ways, just not when it comes to pedalling a bike to where I want to go with it.
E-MTBs can do some serious good to our planet: get cars off the road, get more people on bikes, get rid of shuttle vans, you name it. If you read carefully Matt says his only bike would be an E-MTB because it would basically also prevent him from using his car. That's a fantastic point, and one you should think about next time you load yourself into your fossil-fuel burning car or truck or van to get to the trails.
Well, at least they do some good for Thule, since people have to get stronger carriers to mount two ebikes on their SUV...
Or get a prius and a normal bike. haha
In my eyes at least the big argument against ebikes is trail/land access. I'd consider riding one but I don't want to contribute to trails around me getting shut down, but that's a somewhat regional concern. In places where that isn't an issue it'd be a more likely option.
I agree regulation is important but in order to do so, it would be even more important to first map out what the real effects are on the trail, safety etc. instead of base a regulation on public perception. Considering the avid discussion, it strikes me as odd that such a research doesn't seem to have been conducted yet.
The reason I recommended a "convertible bike" was that I currently have no need for pedal assist for my current condition and where I ride. Except for those odd trips to some proper big mountains, there they may make some sense but it wouldn't justify the investment to get a complete bike just for that.
@Socket: Agreed for the biggest part, for a small bit I don't. Yes if someone who'd otherwise shuttle uphill would now pedal up, this is going to cut fuel use massively. And you don't need (to feel sorry for) someone to ride the car back down the hill again. But as for riding to the trails. Remember a regular e-bike (and the kind of support built into emtb) is tuned to no longer support a rider when going faster than 25km/h. If people take the car to the trailhead, it is because they want to travel (much) faster than 25km/h. So if they'd otherwise use the car to get there, they'd do so too with their e-bike. I can mount two bikes behind the car and two bikes on the roof. The rack behind the car is certified to carry two bikes of up to 30kg so these could be e-bikes. The racks on top can take only bike up to 16kg or 18kg (not sure). So that should be good for regular mountainbikes, but not for e-bikes. So I can currently drive to a trail with four people in the car and their four bikes behind and on top of it. If these were e-bikes, I could take only two so that'd imply the same four riders now need two cars. Now this is all very hypothetical and your scenario may apply too at times. It just goes to show it isn't all that black and white.
In traffic though, yeah for sure e-bikes get people out of their cars. My girlfriend could ride her heavy regular bike to work in 75 minutes or take the car and it takes only 15 minutes because she can then take the tunnel under the canal. That saves her two hours a day. As much as she likes riding her bike, it is not something you want on every workday. She then got a high speed e-bike. Obviously she still can't take the tunnel but it now takes her 45 minutes to get to work. Still one hour more travel time than when driving but acceptable and more predictable (as she doesn't have to worry about traffic jams).
IMBA are actually doing a lot of that work in the US, but it's not getting a lot of publicity as it's not coming up without strong arguments to ban ebikes... Which is not what most IMBA members want to see. There is also a very interesting social study on the impacts of ebikes happening in Colorado right now, but I'm not sure when the results will be out.
Here in France there isn't the same research because, quite simply, away from the internet there isn't a debate - people are buying and riding these bikes in great numbers, to the extent where regular mountain bike sales are almost non-existant in comparison around me. Even talking to some Americans, away from the comments section, the real-world response to people riding ebikes seems limited to mild heckling from other mountain bikers.
Good to know IMBA is investigating it though it is a shame they seem reluctant to reveal results that their members may not like. If they're that easily influenced, we may need another more independent research. I hate to see the mountainbike community turn into a bunch of entitled middle age farts who cling to their rights and possessions and shoo the newcomers away. The klunkers didn't first dig their own trails before they first bombed down, the first skateboarders didn't buy their own pool before they first dropped in. Without any proper research, I see no reason to keep e-bikers of my local trails. On the other hand, if research actually shows some valid points against them then sure there need to be regulations as well. Even where they're actually well accepted, like where you're based. Of course those doing trail maintenance are riding them but then again, those building and doing maintenance also bring in diggers or quads.
I'm all for Ebikes that replace cars. Unfortunately, from my experience so far, most Ebikes just replace mountain bikes, which means they are transported right to the trailhead in exactly the same way, and the battery power is then used to shred more trails within one day. Not a bad thing, in itself, but from an environmental point of view, that doesn't make anything better, but worse.
Now as for e-mtb that's a different story. An mtb is not for transport. It is a toy to go out and have a blast. Or others may be more serious and call it "sports". Either way, nor will an e-mtb be used for transport, it won't replace a car. Unless the car was being used for "sports" too of course. Not sure if Nicolas Vouilloz still races rally cars, but he does race e-mtb. If he did quit rally then yes, that may be the odd one who replaces a car by e-mtb .
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a hater of ebikes. I think most mountain bikers using a converted bike would still pedal, but if you don't initially pedal at all and just rely on the throttle, then all that can mean is extra pedalling later on to cover the same distance, so I struggle to make a distinction.
I think if I went down the road of pedal assistance, I'd go for the conversion.That way you can easily convert back and get the best of both worlds.
As a rider i'm not in the slightest bothered about ebikes or even motos as long as they don't ride past you at warp speed. I think as long as ebikers are considerate there wont be any issues.
i still to pedal it out and earn the descent, but an ebike is just another version of the same experience.
as a music fan, i've had the exact same discussion between the "purists" who only listen to music on high-end stereo systems and in a controlled environment, and those, like me, who favor the "practicality" of having music with you wherever you go, (first with walkmans, now with mp3s). Then the ipod comes along and people's perception shifts.
in the end, it comes down to what you prefer, or need, and there's no wrong answer really. if i could afford one, i would buy an ebike tomorrow and care less what others think, just like any other aspect of life.
I have done regular 9mile commutes on a 170/150mm 41lbs/19kg bike in my youth. Now an ego or similar removable motor kit equipped enduro would be the ticket.
So my choiche is pretty obvious.
The riding experience on eMTB is simply more “intense” than regular bikes, I live in a steep region (pretty close to Matt place), with regular MTB we usually climb paved roads to reach the fun part (downhill) now, with eMTB, I plan my route to find the most technical off road uphill and this is the most fun and challenging part of the ride, the downhill is pretty much the same experience than regular MTB.
If I have to choose only one bike to commute to work I probably choose my gravel because it is simply faster and more practical (light) than eMTB or e-city bikes.
Cheers haters
Realy who likes to push their bikes on endless climbs?
Wouldn't it be cool to add 3 to 4 descents to our weekend rides?
but then I remember why I keep pushing around climbs... without e-mopeds!
Don't be ashamed of riding a moped, thousands of asians do everyday.
You just choosed something that's not a mtb. Cheers.
I get pinkbike ears money true advertisement, but surely there are enough non ebike stuff to earn something from.
Nobody has a problem with Ebikes if they replace a car. But this isn't the place to promote that idea imo. This site is about riding a MTB.
I would keep my rigid SS 29er…