The UCI Integrates BMX Freestyle Park into its Development Strategy

May 17, 2015
by Pinkbike Staff  
FISE

The Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) is pleased to announce the integration of BMX Freestyle Park as a new UCI cycling discipline via the launch of the UCI BMX Freestyle Park World Cup. The first edition of the UCI BMX Freestyle Park World Cup will be held in 2016. This competition will be part of the FISE World Series, the International Festival of Extreme Sports. It will include a minimum of three rounds (four from the following year) which will take place between February and December and will be a springboard for the UCI Urban Cycling World Championships envisaged for 2017. It is foreseen that the UCI Urban Cycling World Championships will include BMX Freestyle Park, mountain bike cross-country Eliminator (XCE) and trials. To achieve its development goals, the UCI will call on the experience of the company Hurricane Action Sports Company, which has been organising the FISE World Series for nearly 20 years.

Why BMX Freestyle Park?
• BMX Freestyle Park is a spectacular discipline. It attracts young people living in cities, an important target of the Olympic Movement.
• The competitors are judged on figures performed throughout the course (difficulty, originality, style), that must be completed within a time limit. The sporting action is simple to explain and can be televised at a lower cost than many other sports.
• The construction of the sporting infrastructure is low cost as it is delivered ready for use, is temporary and does not require a large surface area. The events take place in venue similar to a skate park.

Commenting on this announcement, the UCI President Brian Cookson declared:

The integration of BMX Freestyle Park is excellent news for cycling, the UCI, its National Federations and for fans of our sport. The UCI’s strategy is to target cities for the organisation of major events where our own events
will benefit from the conditions necessary to ensure their popular, media and economic success. Our partner Hurricane will provide us with its knowledge of organisation. The UCI will offer the discipline a high level of recognition, and will thus pursue the development of our sport by meeting the expectations of BMX fans. Thanks to this initiative, BMX Freestyle Park and cycling take another step in their continued globalisation
.”

It is with much enthusiasm that we partner with the UCI for the organisation of the UCI BMX Freestyle Park World Cup within the FISE World Series", said Hervé André-Benoit, Hurricane Action Sports Company Chief Executive Officer. “Our partnership is based on shared values and respects the discipline the way FISE has represented it for the past 20 years. Our collaboration will help accelerate the development of freestyle disciplines and we are proud to contribute, together with the UCI, to this new step forward for BMX.

www.uci.ch


MENTIONS: @fise



Author Info:
pinkbikeaudience avatar

Member since Jul 22, 2013
3,465 articles
Report
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

62 Comments
  • 82 3
 Good luck with Anti-doping laws in freestyle bmx. Keeping the riders off the green stuff will be an interesting challenge.
  • 23 3
 True, true, but is it as big of a concern as helmet rules? :o
  • 10 36
flag jacknew (May 18, 2015 at 14:48) (Below Threshold)
 literally saw steve smith smoking a joint down town nanaimo like a week ago
  • 26 4
 @jacknew go to bed or I'll tell you who santa is
  • 16 2
 freeride- With the helmet crusaders' support on PB, I'm sure all the riders will have no issue being guilt tripped into wearing them. Wink

If I was a BMXer, I'd be worried about the UCI taking things over.... RIP BMX park.
  • 5 3
 Why would you have to keep riders off weed?
  • 6 3
 Is weed against the rules in cycling? If so why? It's not a performance enhancer.
  • 6 2
 Weed is in fact a performance inhancer. In appropriate amounts it can open up the lungs capillaries allowing more oxygen intake among other benefits. It's a big issue in MMA right now. BJ Penn is a great example
  • 7 1
 The UCI banned it for DH about twenty years ago, not because it was a performance enhancer, but because it was a performance changer.
  • 7 1
 If the UCI follows similar guidelines to the WADA and the Olympics then it shouldn't be an issue because unlike things like steroids, it's only banned 'in competition'. Meaning the riders just can't test positive for it on the actual competition days. As long as they aren't competing while high they are fine. The testing thresholds are now set so that someone who uses marijuana in the days or weeks prior won't pop a positive test.
  • 3 0
 It's just a massive contradiction. Governments tell you it's illegal because it's bad for you. But it's banned in many sports. Why? Surely if it's bad for, you should get a head start or something. I call bullshit on at least one of those positions.
  • 4 1
 Also, is jacknew a confirmed liar? I'm sure I've probably missed something but what makes people so sure he's lying? Smith is super fast and super nice. And injured. He's a perfect candidate frankly. Maybe he knows what BJ Penn knows. Years ago I was told of a basketball coach who used to smoke a bowl with his players after heavy training due to it putting you in, what's known as, a parasympathetic state. Would someone explain jacknew's public beating please? I'm just curious. Pretty sure he'd have gone unscathed for saying he saw a rider drinking Monster. Which is still more dangerous than cannabis. Same as peanuts. Same a pen lids. Lol.... Why aren't peanuts illegal? They've been killing people left, right and centre.

No aggro... Just opening debate.
  • 2 0
 @tobiusmaximum
I'm not going to argue about the safety of cannabis or whether it's bad for you because it's really something I know littke about. But your suggestion that something can't be both bad for you and performance enhancing at the same time doesn't make sense. Most well know steroids and performance enhancers are terrible for you in the long run, but they do work.
  • 2 2
 Snitch bitch
  • 3 1
 Are we talking about steroids? I don't think comparing steroids and cannabis is fair, or relevant, for a few reasons. But let's delve deeper, if it's a potential enhancer... Why is it illegal? How are the authorities destroying lives over something which can even potentially be referred to as an enhancement? It just doesn't add up.
  • 1 2
 "if it's a potential enhancer, why us it illegal?"

The fact that you would even ask a question like that shows you have littke little knowledge on the subject of performance enhancing drugs. You need to disconnect the idea that performance enhancing Relates in any way to how healthy something is or how dangerous it can be.
  • 2 1
 Not really. You need to tell me, specific to cannabis, which is both natural and only defined as a drug by the establishment, why the populace have been told it's harmful and lives been ruined by arbitrary horseshit, when it's able to do something good beyond the user getting high. This has never been mentioned. Ever. You explain it. Don't mention steroids or performance enhancing drugs, because cannabis is neither a synthetic drug or presently a performance enhancer.
  • 1 0
 Do you not read what I write? I said I have no idea about the dangers or long-term health benefits of cannabis. Your original post here was talking about contradictions and asking how if something is bad for you, how can it also be an enhancer. I was simply pointing out that your logic was ridiculous, because everyone knows that many 'enhancers' like steroids are proven to be dangerous and terrible for you. I never said anything specific to cannabis. I was just pointing out your faulty logic.
  • 1 5
flag tobiusmaximum (May 19, 2015 at 6:02) (Below Threshold)
 So to recap, you compared two things that aren't comparable, one of which you know nothing about.. And that makes my logic, specific to a discussion about cannabis, somehow faulty? Okay.
  • 1 0
 This is what you wrote:

"It's just a massive contradiction. Governments tell you it's illegal because it's bad for you. But it's banned in many sports. Why? Surely if it's bad for, you should get a head start or something. I call bullshit on at least one of those positions."

So if this is your logic regarding performance enhancing drugs, what would you think of steroid users or guys who blood dope in cycling? Those things are clearly bad for you correct? So are you saying that you would give the steroid users and blood dopers a head start?

Your logic is completely flawed. You are "calling bullshit" and saying that both positions (that a substance can be both bad for you and enhance performance) can't be true but everyone knows it is true, that both positions can exist. Is that the case for cannabis? I don't know and I don't really care. That's not the point.
  • 1 3
 ' Is that the case for cannabis? I don't know and I don't really care. That's not the point.'

Eh? The conversation is about cannabis, specifically. I was referencing the contradiction, specific to cannabis. You 'don't know and don't really care', as a response to the topic in question, pretty much sums up what you're doing with this. Talk to me about the cannabis contradiction. It's not a problem if you can't or don't care, but you've extrapolated out, to other things, a statement I made about a specific thing. There are exceptions to most rules. I see what you're driving at but its apples and oranges. Steroids ain't cannabis. And cannabis ain't no normal plant either.
  • 1 0
 @tobiusmaximum Obviously yes there is a contradiction here between governments feeding us this information that if you inject one marijuana its basically as bad as a life time meth addiction. There's a huge hypocrisy in the fact that alcohol, tobacco, and prescription pain meds are legal whilst cannabis is not - they are all much worse than cannabis in terms of addictiveness, harm on the user, and harm to others who are close to the user. Its clearly not the drug that government propaganda of the last century makes it out to be.

One of the biggest misconceptions that people who have no idea about cannabis will often bring up as a supposed reason for it being kept illegal is that it causes psychosis. This has now pretty much been proven false, it actually just exacerbates psychosis if you have a preexisting likelihood to have a mental problems of that ilk (eg family history of schizophrenia). Whats more, in the UK, one of the ethnic groups with the highest rates of cannabis use (Afro-Caribbean) is also the one with the highest genetic predisposition to psychosis. This confounds research where they try and pick random samples of cannabis users/patients with psychosis to explore the link. If there is a significant proportion of Afro-Carribeans in that study, it will skew the data. Hence the data suggests an erroneous correlation between smoking cannabis and getting psychosis.

Whats more, it now comes to light that hey, cannabis could actually have some cool positive effects, both medicinal (for sufferers of seizures/MS), and non-medicinal (in this example improved sporting performance). However, that doesn't change the fact that fundamentally, burning plant matter and inhaling the resultant smoke is not going to be something that your lungs enjoy - it causes cancer and other respiratory diseases.

Thus you can see how yes, false information has been circulated by governments as to the dangers of cannabis use, but the reality is that whilst it can be "good" in some ways, it is still also a harmful thing for your body if your smoking it -- there's no inherent contradiction in something that is a performance enhancing substance also having negative long term effects.
  • 44 5
 Pretty much the worst thing that could ever happen to bmx
  • 1 2
 If i was a BMX rider I would be crying in tears rigth now.
  • 12 1
 BMXer's don't cry.
  • 24 5
 The UCI is a bunch of MONEY grubbing old roadies.. They have no reason to try to include Freestyle except for $$.. They do not care 1 little oz about BMX.. They saw how much BIGGER Freestyle is than SX racing and the course cost 25% of a Olympic BMX track..

F-OFF UCI!!!!!!
  • 6 1
 Yep, freestyle takes over every sport where freestyle is a thing. Ski, snowboard, BMX, MTB, MX, Sled etc. It's just naturally the way she goes.
  • 8 0
 ...probably because the freestyle aspect of ALL of those sports is easier to televise than the original sports themselves. As above, they only require a limited amount of space, and just a handful of cameras to cover, versus a full length MTB DH track, for example. There's no running cable up gnarly mountainsides and building platforms in sketchy locations. All that adds up to lower costs against similar or greater revenue. ALSO, once you have an event that can fit in a limited space, you can control access to that space and sell tickets.

It's all about the $$$$$$$$.
  • 1 0
 also is an obvious display of skill/talent that is more accessible or interesting to a general audience. Although, if this were entirely true, Martyn Ashton-style "road" riding should have replaced stage races by now.
  • 13 0
 Riders will need to purchase a race/event licence and membership to their national governing body. Interesting if and who will?

Maybe we should concentrate on Downhill in the Olympics. I know just the man!
  • 2 0
 I know the man you're talking about, but I heard he comes up short in a lot of areas Wink
  • 15 2
 so we are not aloud to wear helmet camera's or chest mounts but these guys don't even have to wear a helmet??
  • 6 1
 I think its a great move. It gets the sport out there and the athletes WILL get paid. If you don't want to use your helmet or not follow the regulations go to another comp, or hang out in your favorite spot being rad with your mates! Your free to choose. People saying its all about the money……. I'm struggling hard to make my work uniform a helmet and some knee pads. If I can host an event that makes me money, I can pay my house, my car, my kids school then I can relax and use the rest of event earnings to create more trails, more ramps, more fun events. Am I all about the money??
Anything that gets jumps, ramps, and your guys sponsored is more than ok to me!
  • 5 0
 If this happens there will only be a few regular competitors but the rest of the bmx crowd will stick to doing demos and making video parts or only doing local non-uci events.
  • 5 0
 This is about as old as BMX itself, the constant struggle between being big and getting money or being core and not getting money. BMX will survive in the form YOU choose. Thats what freestyle is.
  • 6 0
 Huh, bit of an interesting move for sure.
Curious if the boys are going to boycott it or get on the UCI bandwagon?
  • 7 0
 Two words: Drug Test. I see it not being good for either.
  • 11 5
 Did they just call bmx "cheap"
  • 13 1
 they said the structures were low cost
  • 8 0
 As well as lower cost to televise. Valid. They never said "cheap".
  • 5 0
 more accessible to the public. thats what the uci is all about. selling cycling.
  • 3 1
 More accessible to the public on TV, but, I wonder if the local shredders will still be able to load up a car an hit the road for a euro trip to enter fise under the uci or will some new quali selection be I place?
As great as this is for bmx being taken more seriously it could also be dampening the 'spirit' of freestyle
Like I wonder if a rider drops in for a rebel run across the course to pull that line that everyone talks aboot
Whether he'd get props or dsq'd???
  • 3 1
 Is it only me that sees this freshly added news at the bottom of the news stack from today? I thought that I can trust pinkbike as a reliable source of important news too, not only videos and race updates...


As for the information itself, R.I.P. bmx guys... I just can't believe it. Freestyle event falling at the UCI's rigid rules? Good luck. Hopefully you won't be obliged to wear a proper dress, because loose fit is too dangerous while tricking.
  • 4 3
 Exactly, as if BMX didn't have it hard enough. Are riders even gonna bother? Why would the UCI really care about BMX? When there are contests in BMX nowadays where helmets aren't required, haha yeah good luck there UCI with your whole BMX embracement. BMX may be good for the UCI's image but most BMXers will probably steer clear just because the UCI is so bad for theirs, LMFAO.
  • 5 0
 So why is there a flatland rider in the photo if the the article is about BMX Park?

Is UCI informed?
  • 1 0
 if anything weed makes you worse in colorado when someone is smoking weed at the dirt jumps be ready to laugh cuz they are gonna have the most hilarious falls every and they don't even care. Once some kid on his BMX looped out on a landing and called it a trick. The could even have best "trick" on weed at these park events
  • 4 0
 "Development"... "strategy"...
  • 4 0
 Or if you write it phonetically it's "Kerr"... "ching".
  • 4 1
 Run away as fast as you can Freestyle BMX!!!
  • 3 3
 And with that BMX has been tainted by the evil hand of the UCI. I was getting so much use out of my of downhill skin suit while on my bmx... I guess there goes that idea. Curse you UCI!
  • 1 0
 UCI sucks but I approve of anything that makes for more park events. There's only one Xgames this year and I don't believe the Dew tour is having park.
  • 1 0
 Now freestyle BMX becomes ucistyle BMX Reminds me of a 4X story I once heard
  • 3 1
 DOWNHILL
  • 1 0
 I thought it couldn't get worse when the xgames took Bmx. I was wrong.
  • 1 0
 Good business move for fise for sure... Those guys ain't dumb.
  • 2 0
 RIP BMX
  • 1 0
 bmx doesn't need uci..............
  • 1 0
 RIP BMX
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.040824
Mobile Version of Website