Tracy Moseley's Remedy 29 - Enduro World Series, Round 1

Apr 23, 2014
by Mike Levy  




Tracy Moseley's resumé is an impressive read, with a handful of national DH championships and World Cup victories spread over her career, but the highlights include both a World Cup overall title and a World Championship victory, stats that are hard to argue with. It's obvious that she has the speed, and some of her more recent cross-country endeavours have shown that her fitness certainly isn't lacking, two ingredients that came together last season for an Enduro World Series overall championship. Keep in mind, thought, that while she was racing on a Trek last year, it was more of a relatively minimalist operation compared to what she was used to during her days on the World Cup circuit. That's changed for 2014, with Trek entering the fray to provide factory support for the team, something that certainly isn't going to hurt her chances this year. And neither is her second overall placing in Chile this past weekend aboard her Remedy race bike featured below, pipped by perennial rival Anne-Caroline Chausson. It's going to be a hell of a season.


Less Travel, Bigger Wheels

One of the most interesting aspects of the Enduro World Series, aside from the actual racing, is the varying equipment choices that the riders make for each race, with setups from bike to bike sometimes being drastically different. And we're not just talking about components, but also wheel size and travel numbers - we saw some top racers using 120mm travel 29ers for the same terrain that had others on 150, 160, and even 170mm travel machines last season - with it being all about what they feel fastest on. Tracy's weapon of choice for the first EWS event of 2014, as well as for much of last year, is the 29" wheeled, 140mm travel Remedy. ''I think it's faster, carries more speed, and I really enjoy riding it," she told Pinkbike about her choice to ride the big wheeler over a 650B wheeled machine. But will we see her aboard either the 650B Remedy platform of the same travel, or maybe the burlier, 160mm Slash in the future? Don't bet against it, although Moseley sounds quite confident in her riding when on the shorter travel, bigger wheeled bike, only reaching for something different when tire selection became an concern: ''That was the issue with the 29er last year, but at the moment I'm super happy on it,'' she explained, ''although I haven't done a massive amount of testing back to back with the 650B yet.'' Does Trek prefer her riding one bike over the other? That doesn't seem to be the case, with it being more about what their racers prefer than any sort of marketing push. ''''I've got a choice of anything, really, travel-wise and wheel size, so we're not restricted to anything. It's entirely up to us, and there aren't any tracks where I feel like I'm struggling on the 29er.'' Multiple victories and an overall championship back that sentiment up.


Versatile Gearing


The entire Trek team is running Shimano drivetrains front to back, and Tracy's Remedy is equipped with a 2013 XTR group rather than the just released eleven speed system, although we'd be willing to bet a large wad of cash that the newer group will make an appearance on her bike at some point soon. Unlike a lot of racers, her bike has been set up with a two chain ring crankset and a front derailleur that she says allows her to avoid pushing during transfer stages. ''Generally, I like to ride as much as I can. I'm not a big fan of pushing the bike, so having that double 'ring crankset means that I can stay on my bike a lot longer, and it also means that I can spin my legs rather than grind a big gear.'' It's that last point that can make a big difference over two long days of racing and climbing during transfer stages, as it is only a matter of getting to the start of the next stage in time, not beating everyone else there. After all, the goal is to arrive a fresh as possible so you can push hard when the clock is running.

Going with a two 'ring system wouldn't have been a viable option only a few short years ago, especially when you consider that these bikes are basically being ridden like they're on a World Cup downhill track for much of the time. Clutch equipped derailleurs are obviously a big key to this, but reliable guides also play a big part, with Moseley's rig making use of the e*thirteen's 74 gram TRSr Dual Guide. ''It worked great last year, and I'm sticking with what works,'' she said of her drivetrain choice.

Tracy Moseley s EWS bike Photo by Matthew DeLorme


Wheels and Tires

The two 'ring drivetrain on Tracy's race bike isn't the only thing to talk about, though, as she has a number of interesting things going, one of them being tires. Moseley hinted above that she had a bit of an issue last season when she needed specific tires for the Remedy's 29" wheels, enough so that she actually made the call to ride a bike with smaller diameter hoops, but also that she is ''super happy'' now. The reason? Her bike has a set of what appear to be production SE4 tires from Bontrager but are actually prototypes that differ from what you'll see in the shops, although she didn't expand beyond that. If we had to guess we'd say that they feature either a higher volume (production width 29er SE4s measure 2.3'' wide) or more flat protection, or maybe both. As a lot of enduro racers do, Tracy goes with a tubeless setup all around, and she told us that she prefers around 24 - 25 PSI up front and 27 - 28 PSI out back. Both tires are mounted on Bontrager's Rhythm Pro TLR Disc 29 wheelset, complete with carbon fiber rims and the company's new Rapid Drive freehub system.

Tracy Moseley s EWS bike Photo by Matthew DeLorme
Tracy Moseley s EWS bike Photo by Matthew DeLorme

Suspension

Despite what you might assume, the life of an Enduro World Series and World Cup downhill champion doesn't always mean that your suspension gets rebuilt with magical unicorn pee for damping fluid after every run - Tracy's bike is running off the shelf FOX suspension on both ends. Yes, we'll likely see her using something special from FOX's RAD program at the next round, but it's somewhat refreshing to see a top level pro going with production units that anyone can get their hands on: a FOX 34 Talas and the FOX Float DRCV shock that's proprietary to Trek's lineup.

Regardless of why type or level of suspension a racer is using, getting the ideal setup for an Enduro World Series event has to be quite the challenge given the varying conditions and somewhat limited practice time. Tracy weighs in on how it compares to setting up a World Cup downhill bike for a one track: ''You're just setting it up for one course, so it's easier in a way because you know exactly what you want the suspension to do in a downhill race,'' she explained us. ''But with enduro, you've got so many variables in a day that there's always going to be a compromise, and you're never going to have the perfect setup.'' What that means is that there comes a point when, although it might not be perfect, the racer has to go with what he or she knows and make the most of it. There is also likely some turning of the external dials during the transfer stages if the next timed section is drastically different than the one that came before it, but Tracy also admits that absolutely nailing the setup might not be as important as it was when her races only went downhill and lasted under five minutes. ''I also think that it's not as crucial as during a downhill World Cup to get it bang-on because there's no way you can have it perfect for every stage, so you kind of need to find that happy medium, which I think is quite hard sometimes,'' she says of having to be okay with compromising at a certain point. ''There are days when you wish it was feeling a bit softer, and days when you wish is was feeling a bit different, so you just have to find one setting that works for everything.'' And that thought sums up a lot of what's great about not just the Enduro World Series, but enduro racing as whole: racers and their bikes have to perform on so many different types of terrain, far more than what you'd see on a single downhill course.


Photos by Matthew DeLorme

Author Info:
mikelevy avatar

Member since Oct 18, 2005
2,032 articles
Report
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

102 Comments
  • 158 8
 Does anybody else just look at the pictures in articles then the comments?
  • 16 1
 yup
  • 24 2
 Is there any other way!?
  • 4 8
flag parkourfan (Apr 23, 2014 at 21:24) (Below Threshold)
 Skim the article?
  • 19 1
 Depends on the workload and occupancy in the office...
  • 11 2
 Ain't no body got time fo reading!
  • 22 13
 When I heard 29" wheels, no time for reading. All I wanted to comment was.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAEiI_x71Ko
  • 1 1
 Just look at the picture, I'm letterless Razz
  • 2 0
 pretty much every time yes...if the comments point towards good/bad writing, i then make a tough judgement call as to whether to read or not...

Unless Mike Levy writes the article, then i read it first.
  • 6 0
 I can't read
  • 35 13
 Proof you don't need a carbon/custom-tuned suspension/single-ring/650B 'nduro setup(did I miss any buzz words?) to be competitive at the top level of the sport!
  • 64 5
 Just custom 29er, fox suspension, xtr drivetrain, deity carbon cockpit, xtr brakes. You know
  • 1 5
flag chyu (Apr 23, 2014 at 21:17) (Below Threshold)
 I see political incorrect here.
  • 6 2
 Look at JC's ride last year and this year even...supposedly fully factory pike, aluminum frame...nothing you can't buy.
  • 4 0
 2x10 with aluminum frame?! Trek please make a small Remedy29
  • 6 0
 Hate to break it, parkourfan, but JC's frames, while supposedly stock, have been and are carbon.
  • 7 0
 Huh I am just happy there was no price tag mentioned... at least people can talk about the bike
  • 2 0
 @Swides they make a 15.5" frame. That's pretty small actually.
  • 1 0
 @seraph I must have not checked too recently, and looks like their 21.5" TT is the most compact fit yet. I'm stoked, thanks!
  • 18 2
 Rad bike.

Can't wait for the internet defects to turn up and tell a EWS championship winner that she shouldn't be riding a 29".
  • 16 1
 T-Mo is an Icon. One of the best all around athletes in the world, gender has no bearing on the fact.
  • 2 8
flag diego-b (Apr 23, 2014 at 20:15) (Below Threshold)
 Obviously you didn't get the joke although there was an lol...jeez
  • 3 0
 Totally agree!!! Shes awesome!
  • 10 0
 It's not about the bike! It's about the rider!
  • 7 4
 It's nice to see someone with a bike with more than one chainring and wheel size other than 650b for once. I totally agree with her on the double chainring, if I wasn't on a budget I would run a double on my all mountain bike instead of a triple setup (which has never failed to get me up and down a hill). Single makes sense for cross country and downhill but for a bike made to go just about any where I don't get why so many people are sacrificing capabilities just so they can ditch a front derauler that weights no more than a cell phone.
  • 7 0
 They do it to get rid of the derailleur, the shifter, the cables, the extra chainring and then improve chain retention (x-sync style rings)
  • 4 1
 if she was sponsored by SRAM shed be all over that 11 speed! I wonder is shimano allowed it would she stick a one-up adaptor on ther and go 1x?

the range is hardly any different from a 2x setup
  • 2 5
 She is going to have her work cut out to beat ACC this year. I still can't believe a 29er is the best option but she's the pro.
  • 2 1
 I see it the other way around. I don't get why people put up with double/triple chain ring systems these days. You aren't sacrificing any capabilities especially with the modern 1x10, 1x11 systems out there. Swapping out a larger or smaller chain ring for your needs is pretty simple too. Without a FD, you have less clutter, one less thing to maintain, some weight saving and just a cleaner looking bike. I started off years ago running 1x9, (switched to 1x10 a little while ago) and have never looked back.
  • 2 0
 Exactly the same with me, I went to 1x10 about 2 years ago and since then don't want to go back. It just makes me work more, and effort is what I love about mtb, why not push harder?
  • 12 1
 If Tracy likes front derailleur it means she has it for a reason, I could go into and talk her double chainset and ratios but that is pointless - It's her bike and she is best at what she does. What is important is that an average PB Joe like me is not Tracy. Let's take expression from the text: "After all, the goal is to arrive a fresh as possible so you can push hard when the clock is running" - now it is painfuly obvious that by "pushing hard" Tracy and I mean two different things, my hard is probably slightly above her rest-coast. In my very own theory single chainring setup, particularly one with 34-36t cog in the rear, is an excellent motivator to train. Tracy on another hand does not need such "superstitions" - she trains hard not to avoid getting stressed about getting too sloppy (like I do), but to win a globaly recognized race. So I grind hard gears as I find a challenge in it. Her challenges are beyond my imagination and sorry to prejudge but I think that applies to vast majority of riders out there. Use what you want tripple, double, single, wide range cassette, but at the end of the day, an item that gets you to push harder than to sit and coast is a great item. If a low gear lover wouldn't need motivation to train and excell he'd be on the pictures from that race.
  • 1 0
 I think your kind of right waki

she has a very good point about arriving at enduro stages fresh, im ordering a one-up expander for my bike b4 the UKGE/ EWS rounds in scotland for this very reason, those climbs are loooong

will be intersting to see if she goes 1x11 when she gets the 2015 XTR, I reckon she will
  • 2 0
 I mean, if I now said that I need to be fresh on top of the mountain to push hard on the timed stage it would be ridiculous. I am not pushing hard, I am doing something I think is hard, usualy stupid hard followed by deflated. Talking about resting to that is ridiculous. J.Wilson said it very well: there is no prize for the most steady pace and sorry but I believe most of us amateurs push for the most steady pace. There is not much bad about it as we all have our reasons to be so. What sucks is that stupid glorification and motivation of particular equipment choices, based on what PROs use, wishing that it will push us up the results list, while the only effective way to move up that list in our case is training, practicing and getting race experience. Tracy needs tools for winning, we need tools for practicing - that is the technological difference between her and us!
  • 3 1
 I've had an idea for a while now and think I might try it at some point over the summer. Its probably not an original idea, and has most likely been done before, but I've never heard it talked about, and think this would be the perfect application for it and good place to discuss.
I have converted my 3x10 into a 1x10 with a bash guard in place of the big ring, and installed a WT 42t GC and am very happy with the range. BUT as I was converting it, I was thinking... What if you kept the single ring narrow-wide setup, and also left the small granny gear in place, but still ditched the front derailleur and shifter.
The idea being you could easily move your chain over onto the small ring for the super extended climbs or transfer stages, then back onto the big ring at the top. This way you would still have the range, simplicity and security of a narrow-wide 1x10 setup for 99% of your riding. You would ditch the weight of the shifter, derailluer, and cable, and as a secondary benefit you would have a place for your chain to go if you still managed to drop it off your primary ring, and that could save your ass on a descent whether it is timed or not. There is no real downside to leaving that tiny ring on. It weighs all of what... 10 grams!?
Kind of janky, but kind of brilliant as well, especially for the "enduro" race format or long ass trail rides that gain some serious elevation all at once.
  • 1 0
 That sounds brilliant Metacomet! You could even have a narrow wide granny if your trip included some ridge ride before getting to the final downhill. Lower gearing ratio does makes sense to me as an amateur if the climbs are long, whole trip is long and if you have some heavy tyres, eventually if someone has a muscle structure favoring higher cadence. But I personaly like hard gears and rarely ride in the proper mountains, and it many gasses will have to pass until I will be able to race in a proper Enduro race.
  • 2 0
 Thanks Waki.
A narrow-wide slightly smaller granny would be interesting! Im not aware of anyone making a N-W with the correct BCD to bolt in place of the granny ring though, but it would be very cool to see!
Keeping that granny in place would also let you run a more ideally sized big ring that you won't spin out of on your given terrain, and not have any concern about whether or not you the correct gearing as to not suffer severely on the long climbs or transfers.
I am generally really really Really in favor of wide range 1x setups and cannot see myself going back to a 2x10 anytime ever, but they still have some obvious limitations at the moment. The setup I'm running performs and shifts very well, but the equipment is not all ideal, and sram and shimano 1x11 pricing is still out of site for me for drivetrain equipment, and is still not 100% perfect IMO.
Running a 42 tooth cog with a 10 speed derailluer diminishes your chain wrap at the cassette which increases wear, has a less than ideal chainline when in the big cog, does not shift quite as perfect, and limits you to a long cage derailluer if you have a lot of rear travel and/or a lot of chain growth in your suspension design.
I love the added chain tension from a short cage derailleur, and if I were doing a enduro race, or my trail rides constantly demanded it, I would ditch the 42t cog, put a larger primary narrow-wide chainring, reinstall that granny ring, and run a short cage Saint derailluer.
  • 3 0
 Spinning out is a myth in most cases. If top DH guys use 38t ring for PMB and 36t for anything else, then bigger chain rings are obviously reserved for fireroad pinners. Sure there are races like that buuuut, for general riding... nope.
  • 1 0
 I totally agree spinning out is a myth. By bigger, I meant like 32-34, mayyyybe 36, but thats really pushing it for what is realistically practical for anything . Bigger than that would be crazy for any kind of real trail ride or terrain that can properly be considered mountain biking. I could never spin out my 30t on pretty much any of my local trails, or pretty much anywhere else I have ever ridden in my region. Way too technical and constant up and down, but on double track or dirt roads, or on the way too the trail head, you do run out of gearing pretty quick, and having a 32 or 34 would be more ideal all round if you did not have to give up too much of your low range. Just talking options, and what would give the most usable versatility.
  • 1 0
 If you are racing any course with technical terrain, chances are you are still going with a chain guide, so manually dropping down to a granny gear wouldn't work. If you are going to add a granny ring, you may as well just do a proper 2x drivetrain then. Why go halfway at that point?
  • 1 0
 "By bigger, I meant like 32-34, mayyyybe 36" ... Don't take this the wrong way, but you'd probably be better off hitting the gym a little bit more than adding a granny gear here.
  • 1 0
 Just a concept. Getting rid of the shifter and derailleur and all that clutter feels damn good in my opinion, and do not ever really want to reinstall them on my bike. Couldn't you run a 2x chainguide just like the one she is using? I dont think that would interfere with the ability to move your chain manually. Not quite the same chain retention as a full on guide, but when combined with a narrow-wide ring should be quite adequate.
  • 2 1
 Metacomets idea would save a little weight but I would get tired of manually shifting it, and I'm envisioning all the grease on the glove. But it would be good for rides with long sustained climbs where you only use the granny, if the trade off of lower weight is more important than having a shifter.

I don't understand why you would want a
Narrow wide granny? Who loses chains on a climb? Would also make your manual shifting even more difficult.

Waki finally exposes that he doesn't ride in the mountains, which is why his ideas about his flatland "mountain" biking experiences sometimes seem so irrelevant to me.

Waki: "I like to push big gears because I'm an amateur, and I don't ride in the mountains, but I also have previously stated front derailleurs should be eliminated, even though I am contradicting myself here by saying ride whatever you want. Also, I've also never raced enduro but have lots of confusing opinions about it."
  • 2 0
 I love where this is going
  • 1 0
 hahaha. Your right Gamblor, but if I'm not spinning out my 30 or 32 tooth when it matters to me the most and where I ride the most often, then why do I want to sacrifice my low end range? I want to have gears I can use, not gears that look cool.
I'm just vetting an idea I had, as I dont see any real downside or disadvantage to bolting that tiny ring on there and forgetting about it.
Tracy is running a 2x10 here with aformentioned wimpy wimpy gym free granny ring, and so are a lot of other people around the world, so clearly there is a real-world reason to having that extra low gearing whether you are a pro or not.
  • 1 0
 I like your idea, metacomet, I just don't understand Waki's idea about anarrow wide for a granny. But yeah, why not keep the granny on just in case you need it later in the ride or want to save some energy. I agree with her that its better to spin than hike or push big gears inefficiently up a climb.
  • 1 0
 Cool, yeah thats the idea. Its just there not bothering a damn thing, and a godsend when you need it. Its not meant to be something you are using constantly during a ride. I think Waki was basically expanding on the idea of possibly using a slightly oversized granny that you could leave it in after you crest the climb and ride flats and mild descents for a short distance without instantly running out of gears. Like maybe just an old lady 26 or 28t ring or even a 30t if you were running a 34, just maybe not full on 24t granny. lol
  • 1 0
 Meta, I'm not knocking your idea or anything, I'm just saying that if you are going to use the granny more than a few times, you may as well just do a proper 2x setup at that point (such as TM above). Personally, I'd rather keep a clean 1x setup and just grind out a climb than have an extra ring attached thats going unused 99.9% of the time.
  • 1 0
 Dont worry, im not taking it that way. Its all constructive conversation, and you are exactly correct. Whether or not this makes sense is something you would need to assess for yourself, and your terrain. I would think that if I needed to stop and manually move the chain more than once or twice per ride, more than once every hour, or are constantly running out of range, then it would either warrant a front derailleur, or a different approach to your gearing. If there is not one single climb that does not last at least 15-30 minutes, then you should be fine sticking to your single ring. But for the occasions like larger mountains or these enduro races where you might encounter one arduous 5-10 mile climb at a time, you might not mind having the ability to at least access that low gearing so you can keep pedaling and not feel like crap for the downhills. I have been running a clean 1x setup for the last two seasons and love it and feel its perfect for my terrain, and my preferences, and I can ride with that range pretty much all day with plenty of low gearing left over for the steep and long. This whole idea was about minimizing the compromises in your gearing, chain retention, and simplicity. There just doesnt seem to be much of a downside to bolting it on there and forgetting about it. It adds no clutter, and practically no weight at all. Those rings weigh next to nothing, lol
  • 2 0
 Metacomet, I do what you suggested. It was great when I lived in the mountains and you might be climbing for an hour or more before doing full on downhills. I had just broken my chain guide and middle ring, and needed a new derailleur so decided to give it a go. It's been good for the last year, though I have dropped my chain twice in the last month, which is annoying. In general, if a climb looks short I'll just push on through in the middle ring, but if i know it's a grind I'll take the 10 secs to change my front gear manually. Rode the EWS in Whistler with it last year and it was great, really saved some energy / walks on the transfers.
  • 2 0
 I run a 30T raceface narrow wide 1x10 set up with only a taco, but keep my 22T "Stealth Granny" on so for the long steep climbs, you'd never know it was there, only weighs 36g and works a treat. Weather permitting I'm riding up Snowdon tomorrow, so will be damn glad of it!
  • 3 0
 I'm running a 32t WT ring but have left the 24t granny on as well. As its a 1x9 setup there's no clutch and the granny ring generally catches any lost chains. I also refer to it as the bonk breaker, yes I can grind up most things with the 32/34 but it fatigues you pretty quick. Its useful to be able to manually bail to a friendlier gear if sufficiently desperate. I've just recently installed an old blackspire duallie roller guide upside down to help with chain retention. It only just touches the chain in the last couple of climbing gears. The rest of the time it sits just above the chain and prevents it from bouncing too much. Haven't dropped the chain since and as its not a box guide I can still manually shift to the granny. Would love a clutch and 40 or 42 teeth, but this setup didn't cost me anything beyond the WT ring.
  • 1 0
 I guess I should ride a 1x driveterrain before I shoot it down. But currently I can't nearly afford a 1x setup, even a 2x is still way more expensive than a 3x9 set. I just don't like the idea of having to switch chainrings depending on the trail. What if your going somewhere you've never rode before and you get to a hill that is steep and you have a larger chainring. You could've climbed it with your smaller chainring but you didn't know to put it on. So you have to wait till the next time you get to ride there to go back to that hill and climb it. Idk I guess it's just me but when I think of an all mountain bike (which is basically what an "enduro" bike is) I think its a bike made to go absolutely anywhere and everywhere. I like my 3x9 knowing I can crawl up a steep hill if I needed too. If I want to push myself I can press a button and it gets harder to pedal but I still have something to fall back on. And I know that I will never ever spin out of gears on a 3x9. My used Shimano 3x9 setup shifts damn good I have no complaints. My freshly built all mountain bike is a 2008 Ellsworth Moment weighs 33 pounds with 3x9, downhill tires with tubes, 8 inch front, 7 inch back rotors, and 6 inch travel coil shocks. I know that there is probably few trails that the bike can't handle and those trails I myself probably couldn't handle. I have a habit of over building my bikes but that's just my 2 cents.
  • 1 0
 If your ridding that then fair gane, youprobly do need more than a 1x but i only have a 34 chainring. If I need to go up steeps I just stand up and push, you get used to it
  • 1 0
 Protour: narrow wide granny costs nearly the same to manufacture as regular granny. NW chainrings from most companies cos only slightly more than their normal single rings. And yes I don't ride often in big mountains, but that is irrelevant in my case. When I lived in Poland I used to climb 2000ft on a normal ride - in Gothenburg, the highest climb barely exceeds 200ft BUT I do many of such climbs in one ride so it evens up. Furthermore, those climbs here are steep, full of rocks and turns, while in bigger mountains I often climb on fireroads. I like your serious pompatic tone to little matters - it is a gift, consider becoming a politician.

Chain retention: in many cases NW coped with clutch rear mech is enough to keep the chain on. I have some nasty rockgardens here and once I forgot to engage the clutch on Zee and I still didn't drop the chain. I guess if you ride really fast, like EWS stages, then you need the upper guide.

Vans4life14 - your bike setup makes it perfectly reasonable to run a front mech, as long as you really DO need such heavy tyres, which obviously may be the case.

lozzerbiker is right: you get used to harder gears, and I'd say it doesn't take more than a month. A positive side effect on steeps, particularly in loose or slippery conditions is that hard gear provides more traction.
  • 1 0
 Well I'm happy to hear that people are doing this out there in the real world and having great results with it! I knew I couldnt be alone with this idea. Thanks for sharing joebunn, TrailCrew, and Nutcracker Vans4life - Dont be concerned if you are running 3x or 2x or whatever. If its working for you and you Like it, then just ride it. I was posing this question more for those of us that are running a dedicated 1x, and are very happy with it. It seemed trivial to me when I was converting to 1x, to be removing that small ring as its just not hurting a damn thing. The big ring on a triple to me personally is just a nuisance. I was always clipping mine on rocks and logs and ledges and would chip the teeth, or bend the ring as it lowers your clearance by so much, and I was never Really using it when on the trails. Plus it compromises your chain tension by so much when in the middle ring and smaller cogs, due to the extra chain length you need to run in order to have the chain capacity for that big ring to work. But all that being said, I really like starting off with the 3x crank configuration as it allows for 1x or 2x with a bashring, and I can even bolt on the big one if long road sections are in order. All your options are covered. I think the in the future though, Many many many manufacturers are going to stop incorporating front derailleur mounting provisions in their designs for the majority of FS bikes.
  • 1 0
 Gamblor - Even if you don't Need the expanded range, the fact that the chain now has somewhere to go if it does fall off the inside, is enough to justify the 30 gram weight addition in my mind. Plus you have the range if you are in despair or encounter a rediculously long and sustained climb. That 30g amount is completely insignificant. If anyone is truly concerned about that 30g, then take a sip of water from your pack or bottle, swish it around in your mouth, and then spit it out and you will break even. lol I guess I just like options, and having things that are modular. I love having as clean of a setup as possible, but I also dont like being pigeon holed into one option, and one option only. And I would rather pedal my bike up a climb rather than push it, within reason of course.
  • 1 0
 Waki -the reason for the burly setup is because I want to race downhill on my bike but don't have a full dedicated downhill bike. I need to be able to climb up to my descents because only like one of my local trails has a shuttle service and most of th trails don't require a full on dh bike. So I just built it to tackle anything Meta - I totally understand 1x drive terrains it's just not for me. I could see it on cross country or definitely dh but for me on my all mountain bike I wouldn't go past a 2x10 it just works for me like you said, and like 1x works for you.
  • 5 1
 Talk to her for a moment last year at Winterpark for the EWS in the States. She's pretty rad and was willing to give some time to a stranger about her race run and herself.
  • 2 0
 if she was sponsored by SRAM shed be all over that 11 speed! I wonder if shimano allowed it would she stick a one-up adaptor on ther and go 1x?

shes a great rider and a very friendly person, have met her at the UK series

I bet those custom bonty tyres have puncture protection, mate running the XR4s got a big tear in his on a transition last race and T-Mo lost out in the UK series a couple of years ago at Coed-Y-brenin because of a pinch flat on her bontys
  • 2 1
 Graves is with shimano and he does 1x
  • 1 0
 but i doubt he uses a non shimano expander sprockets, and have you seen the size of his legs, Ill bet theyve not seen a granny ring in years!
  • 1 0
 "Whats a granny gear?" asks Graves
  • 3 0
 Graves' granny probably doesn't even use a granny gear!
  • 1 0
 Yeah, also met her. She is very, very nice person. Really friendly and helpful. Even when she was very busy she took some time and helped me with my DH bike settings. Thanks Tracy.
  • 1 0
 Pretty sure last year Graves ran a Leonardi adapter on his shimano cassette.
  • 2 0
 Good stuff. Love the look of those tires, might have to grab some. Not much reason to look beyond 2.5" minions if you need larger volume tires with aggressive treads, but I doubt she can run those!

I dig the dual ring setup, it makes so much sense for a sport like this. A full range of gearing for climbing to the top, and a full range to go back down, instead of half the cassette for up, and half for down. Hell, you could probably slap a little plastic cage into the derailleur and lock it out/turn it into an upper guide on the way down.
  • 3 0
 Funny. Last article I said she was on a 27.5 Slash then the very next day Pinkbike makes sure I know I was wrong. I STAND CORRECTED..... GEEZ.... Love T-Mo tho. She rips.
  • 1 0
 Love seeing the Remedy 29er get some professional racing coverage. The geometry isn't as aggressive as some of it's competitors out there, but it's still a fantastic all around AM bike.

Also, I couldn't agree with her more on going 2x10. I need to demo some 1x11/10 bikes, but I can't see being served at both ends of the spectrum with 1x. As negative as early impressions on the new XTR might be (and the cranks are ugly as hell) I think a 2x11 with 24/36 gearing could delivery superior speed and climbing performance. Just MHO.
  • 5 0
 sick bike . .
  • 5 0
 love the 29er
  • 1 1
 First bike that's been on here for a while which is actually financially attainable by most, great to see aluminium isn't dead yet. They look like great bikes to and is definately on my short list for a new machine.
  • 1 0
 $4,400 for a bicycle is attainable my most? The entry level Remedy costs more than a decent used car. Ask an average person on the street how much a new mountain bike should be and I guarantee you it's a three figure number for 9 out of 10. It's funny how the people who spend all their time whining about how overpriced bikes are on this site seem to have no concept of what price, value or indeed, money really is.
  • 1 0
 I've got a Trek Slash with CTD DRCV shock in the rear. Does anyone else find when in Descend mode is a bit too soft/open? Currently I've got 210psi in it.
  • 2 1
 So basicly you're saying you have a FOX CTD product? Razz
  • 1 0
 Yeah, and unlike their forks they have yet to fix this from 2013-2014. I sent mine in to have it firmed up and it still sucks. Next step is to have it PUSH'd, which I think will do the trick. I love my Remedy, but I probably won't go with anything attached at the proprietary hip to Fox ever again.
  • 2 0
 Sheesh, those cranks look so much better than the new ones coming out.
  • 1 3
 All the talking here......lots of experts or most total experts here Wink ))

Ha! And what to do? I tell you what.... I really like this bike. I'd love to have it!!! I think this is great and I love Tracy. She is a super athlete and great person.

I am just about to buy and Enduro bike. I am thinking of:
Specialized Enduro 29
Kona Process 153
Canonndale Jekyl 29
and maybe this Trek
  • 1 2
 sorry, Jekyl 27,5
  • 3 0
 ask in the forums.
  • 2 1
 Lol anyone else notice the wristwatch on his bars Big Grin
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.061554
Mobile Version of Website