Words - VelosolutionsVelosolutions joins forces with Flims Laax Falera to build Nagens. The visionary mindset, the overwhelming natural beauty, the endless mountain bike trails and an initiative called Greenstyle were the reasons for Velosolutions to move to the Swiss holiday destination in 2018.
Two years later, Velosolutions is able to announce a big milestone on its way to the goal of becoming a fully electric construction company:
Nagens - the world’s first mountain bike trail that is built with 100% electric machinery, all charged with renewable energy.
What this means:
• No combustion engines are allowed on the mountain.
• Electric excavators and compactors, electric dumpers and chainsaws.
• All transport of the crew, including visits of the authorities, photo-graphers, officials, supervisors etc. is done by e-cars or e-bikes.
• All batteries are charged with sustainably produced electricity from hydro or solar power.
Hand-built trails tend to be cult-like in comparison, especially if there are many local builders continually transforming it, keeping it fresh.
I tend to see poor planning done with hand-built, with a number of trails spidering everywhere and signs of abandoned efforts that perhaps proved unsustainable. Can turn into an ugly mess that has me following locals to learn how to make a fun route that samples some of the best, which tend to be short in length, and having me wonder how many other routes I need to link together to sort of be filling, without it feeling repetitive. Some builder personalities are reflected too, as if they wanted an outlet for anger/aggression.
It was supposed to be a joke, but it doesn’t look like anyone took it that way.
Even if I support renewable power sources it's still funny.
Any operator on my crew who ran out of diesel would get reminded of it every day for at least a couple of weeks.
As for solar panels, dude, come on. That data has been available for over a decade. Average panel makes back the energy it took to create within 2-4 years. Then 25 more years of nothing but bonus.
So I’m turning it right back on you, educate yourself. It’s literally 2 seconds of Google and you’ll have it all in front of you. And it’s all super straight forward. No reason to be hobbled by nonsense anymore.
As far as him "needing" a motor... Don't think he "needs" it at all. You would have to ask him, but my guess is he pedaled to the top.
The term itself really has nothing to do with environmental impact during construction.
I see where you're coming from. Certainly the impact is large in comparison to doing nothing. And there's a time and place for things. That being said, I would guess based on observations and experience, that most hydroelectric power facilities aren't the number one cause of environmental problems in most places (a number of said facilities, that I've seen anyway, are centrally located in or near cities). Also, you're probably already aware but not all hydroelectric energy comes from rivers.
I think the point that @andydmorris was trying to make is simply that we, as humans in this modern (albeit socially backward) time, need energy for things. At the end of the day, when done well, hydroelectric is (grand scheme) a fairly clean source of said energy.
@RedBurn: CO2 by itself isn't a problem per se. Same goes for water. Problem with CO2 currently is that fossil fuels consist of CO2 conserved thousands of years ago. Releasing at the current high rate causes an imbalance. Same goes for water vapour emitted at high altitude (by aircraft). It doesn't easily get up there by itself, aircraft bring it there (as they burn fuel). And it doesn't easily get away from there either. It stays there and contributes more to the greenhouse effect than CO2 would do up there.