I wonder how much it costs PB to run the fantasy leagues? Like, I don't really care about the prizes that I'm not winning anyways. I just like it as a way to stay engaged with a race format that's otherwise fairly difficult to follow closely (since there isn't a live broadcast to speak of). If companies don't want to step up and sponsor it, so be it.
I propose that PB runs the fantasy league, and the only prize is that the winner gets a secret code that allows them to view PB without any autoplay videos. And the losers all promise to click through on at least 3 ads to generate enough revenue for PB to cover the cost of running the league.
There's an outside chance your fantasy will come true this year. The entire industry seems to have blown it's wad delivering other dreams. Thoughts and prayers.
@Dillonmennie: Jesse said he wanted to move to a brand that felt like they actually care about racing, a few other comments youd have to go back to an find as cant remember
Starting to hear some of the lighter riders going back to the 36/Lyrik for a little more flex/compliance instead of just pushing the "bigger is better" narrative.
@ZSchnei: I held off on buying an Enduro bike with a zeb, seems like the rush of 38 stanchions was slowing down. On 35 forks which is probably better for my weight anyway
My guess is because of the extra long sizing on the Canyon Strive. The size small Strive has a reach of 450-460 mm and the small Spectral's reach is 431mm
Jesse said hes on the spectral for fit, assuming the strive is to big.
Enduro bikes are ment to be designed as race bikes so its weird they make them so big when if your racing thats not what you want
@NZracer91: Enduro (and all) bikes are designed to sell. The racing is just part of their advertising program. Bike manufacturers are there to make $$. If they win races, it's just better advertising.
Enduro bikes aren't too extreme, it just depends on the course. If there are long sustained downhill sections l, then you need an enduro bike with nearly DH bike capabilities. If the course has short downhill, flatter section, then DH again, it can be faster to ride an agressive trail bike and go faster through the flatter bits.
I also think that "trail bike" is too broad of a category nowdays. Theres a huuuuge gap between XC and Enduro. Some newly designed "trail bikes" may as well be called enduro bikes with their 63, 64* head angles. On a course that's not crazy-steep you won't give up much descending, and you'll gain a lot in pedaling efficiency on some of these new school "trail bikes."
@wburnes: This only shows the average of what's being run, not the "preferred" stanchion diameter or "best" stanchion diameter. Stanchion diameter in itself is also not the only variable that goes into designing the proper fork, e.g. the 35mm stanchions of the Pike and Lyrik are housed by different chassis in different weight categories and stiffness categories.
@wburnes: "Preferred", in this case, was based on averages for already existing products (35/36mm stanchions and 38mm stanchions) and bike setup, not on product engineering or testing. It's obvious that the average is going to be around 37mm by simply looking at the mere 3 stanchions sizes being evaluated and doing math in my head, I don't even need a calculator.
"Prefered" is also far different from "best". Therefore, 37.1 is not the magic number, not until we have definitive evidence that this has been studied and tested against the existing stanchion sizes.
@wburnes: I'm far from pendantic, and I'm definitely not wrong. I'm annoyed by your poor communication and use of "averages" to claim that the perfect stanchion size has already been determined -- it hasn't.
I also get annoyed when people try to spread misinformation because they didn't take the time to do their own research, or in this case, take the time to enunciate their thoughts in a clear manner.
Back to the "data" you shared. If the same polling was done at a race where athlets only used 35 & 36 mm stanchions do you still think the preferred stanchion would be 37.1?
Your logic is flawed and now your replies are formed off emotions rather than rational thinking.
Don´t know what they´re gunning for. On the Jersey it´s the old logo, so it maybe a one off, thing, like maybe a tribute to an old Logo we´re not aware off. Maybe it`s supposed to be a resemblece to the fact that something changed (indepentend company wihtin pon-holding) without any real change. I don't know, it´s somehow weird. Also it´s to small a logo for the downtube.
There has never been live coverage of enduro events, they tried past year with the Pro-Stage, something similar to DH coverage but it sucked. So these videos plus the video after the race is all we got.
@elyari: Look at motorcycle World Enduro events; they have no lIve coverage - it's all highlights on You Tube, and the Hard Enduro really only have Erzberg live.....and they're both bigger sports than EWS. It's just too expensive to cover events live, rallying only went live a few years ago.
@Starch-Anton: this sport, this huge industry and fans deserve live events... Actually if you're not live you're not a true TV show... Enduro missed the opportunity to race over days... Training in the morning racing in the afternoon... This way you will engage the audience... Now there's a full stack of pro riders... You have them there for a week at least doing few... If enduro work cup is no longer for amateurs f*cking bring a professional formar and not racing just on Sundays... That's hilarious...
@PauRexs: It's a bicycle race,not a fcking TV show. As @Starch-Anton mentioned,motorcycle enduro hasn't live coverage,and it's way bigger than mtb enduro. GCN has a new channel dedicated to racing and will be putting out quick highlights after the race and the usual report of the race after 2 or 3 days.
Would be nice to get a dedicated tab or page on PB that has links to the videos for each of the races all in one place - would make it easier to follow than a separate post each one.
Pretty hard to get live coverage that would be worth watching. The runs are long and mostly through dense forest - there are few places where getting good drone footage would be practical. You would need a ton of cameras on each course to capture more than just 5-second snippets of each rider coming past, and moving them between stages with enough time to get set up would be difficult.
On the plus side for me, it's only an hour's drive to go watch in person
They are called counterpunch. You can get them with grips too. I think the custom bit for Charlie is getting them to work with the grips he prefers to ride.
I highly recommend the counterpunch. Been running them for a couple of months and they have protected me from rocks and cactus. They never get caught on anything except they kinda dig into wet ground if your bike hits the dirt.
The idea behind counterpunch relies on you holding your grips at their outer ends, so ideally they wouldn't hook anything. Another cool bit about 'em is a lot of people claim a bit more control using them.
You guys clearly dont follow Jack Moir. He has been riding it for some time now and not even hiding it. You can se some pretty close up shots on his videos.
Depends on how a person is riding. Enduro is mostly pedaling up significant inclines, then descending nearly flat-out. Not much flat terrain. As such, if the rider is seated, the terrain plus suspension sag is tilting the bike many degrees rearward, on average, and almost all descending is done standing.
Her saddle angle looks weird on flat ground, but it makes sense when you consider the average tilt when she's sitting.
Katy is Scottish and the thing you're thinking of as Euro is a UK/Commonwealth thing for the most part. Most of Europe runs their brakes just like you do.
I'm used to it being referred to as "moto style" but I guess in the UK they call it Euro.
@karatechris: I can only speculate that it’s a vestige from when you used hand signals on motos.
If you drive on the right hand side, your left hand is most visible to traffic on both sides of the road. So the throttle is on the right, clutch is on the left, since you can’t take your had off the gas to signal.
Similarly with your push bike, the front brake is (perceived to be) the more dangerous brake, if you’re signaling with your left the right hand “should” control the rear.
I set up all of my curly bar bikes moto, but leave the flat bar bikes normal American/Euro style. Moto on the curly-boiz comes from an old wrist injury where I felt I really needed my stronger hand controlling the more powerful brake in emergency situations.
Hydraulics brakes on flat bars are ergonomically different enough that 1) I can stop plenty fast with my left hand on the front and 2) I don’t ever confuse the two set ups.
@pmhobson: I rode moto for almost 20 years before starting MTB and I also never had an issue going back and forth between mx and mtb. I think the dominant hand thing has something to it. I know some moto guys try to swap it so the front brake is on the same side but it's truly been a non-issue for me
@pmhobson: Right right right, I said that totally wrong. Was trying to explain it to the other dude who seemed confused by it, and got totally tripped up and muddied the waters even further. Thanks for calling it out.
Most riders where Katy is from run their brakes moto style with the front brake controlled by the right hand. Most north americans and europeans run their brakes with the front brake lever on the left. Katy talking about euro style is saying that she does NOT run her brakes moto, which is unusual for where she's from. Euro is the opposite of moto.
Does anyone know what fork travel and flip-switch position Charlie Murray is running on the Enduro. I’ve heard 180 fork but not sure and curious if high or low.
idk about the 38 but it was leaps and bounds better than my 36, especially when it gets steep and chunky. It was easily the biggest upgrade I have experienced, including switching entire frames
Some people definitely want video, and the title of this article makes it pretty dang clear what to expect.
We have bike checks on the way with photos. This video was produced by the UCI Mountain Bike World Series, and it was interesting, so we posted it up.
I propose that PB runs the fantasy league, and the only prize is that the winner gets a secret code that allows them to view PB without any autoplay videos. And the losers all promise to click through on at least 3 ads to generate enough revenue for PB to cover the cost of running the league.
Last time they did pro enduro bike checks, the average preferred stanchion was 37.1mm
like the canyon group, all but one on the spectral... thats anti advertising for the strive.
spectral has 150. JM is using a longer shock to get 160.
Men and women averages:
Headangle: 64.3
Reach: 458
Stem: 40
Chainstay: 435
Rotors: 205
Stanchions: 37.1
Coil: 6
Air: 7
Women averages:
Headangle: 64.4166
Reach: 445.416
Stem: 37.0714
Chainstay: 435.2
Rotors: 202.2857
Stanchions: 36.6
Coil: 3
Air: 3
Men averages:
Headangle: 64.238
Reach: 468.5
Stem: 43.05
Chainstay: 434.0714
Rotors: 206.5
Stanchions: 37.5
Coil: 3
Air: 4
www.pinkbike.com/news/what-geometry-numbers-pro-enduro-racers-prefer.html
I even excluded from the numbers anyone who did not have a stated preference or claimed to not have experience with other products/geo numbers
"Prefered" is also far different from "best". Therefore, 37.1 is not the magic number, not until we have definitive evidence that this has been studied and tested against the existing stanchion sizes.
I also get annoyed when people try to spread misinformation because they didn't take the time to do their own research, or in this case, take the time to enunciate their thoughts in a clear manner.
Back to the "data" you shared. If the same polling was done at a race where athlets only used 35 & 36 mm stanchions do you still think the preferred stanchion would be 37.1?
Your logic is flawed and now your replies are formed off emotions rather than rational thinking.
@styriabeef What does that ”independent within a corporation” thing even mean???
It's just too expensive to cover events live, rallying only went live a few years ago.
Enduro missed the opportunity to race over days... Training in the morning racing in the afternoon... This way you will engage the audience...
Now there's a full stack of pro riders... You have them there for a week at least doing few...
If enduro work cup is no longer for amateurs f*cking bring a professional formar and not racing just on Sundays... That's hilarious...
As @Starch-Anton mentioned,motorcycle enduro hasn't live coverage,and it's way bigger than mtb enduro.
GCN has a new channel dedicated to racing and will be putting out quick highlights after the race and the usual report of the race after 2 or 3 days.
And that is OK with me.
On the plus side for me, it's only an hour's drive to go watch in person
www.loamlab.bike/products/counterpunch
I'm used to it being referred to as "moto style" but I guess in the UK they call it Euro.
If you drive on the right hand side, your left hand is most visible to traffic on both sides of the road. So the throttle is on the right, clutch is on the left, since you can’t take your had off the gas to signal.
Similarly with your push bike, the front brake is (perceived to be) the more dangerous brake, if you’re signaling with your left the right hand “should” control the rear.
I set up all of my curly bar bikes moto, but leave the flat bar bikes normal American/Euro style. Moto on the curly-boiz comes from an old wrist injury where I felt I really needed my stronger hand controlling the more powerful brake in emergency situations.
Hydraulics brakes on flat bars are ergonomically different enough that 1) I can stop plenty fast with my left hand on the front and 2) I don’t ever confuse the two set ups.
Most riders where Katy is from run their brakes moto style with the front brake controlled by the right hand. Most north americans and europeans run their brakes with the front brake lever on the left. Katy talking about euro style is saying that she does NOT run her brakes moto, which is unusual for where she's from. Euro is the opposite of moto.