Interesting that with the size small, the wheelbase is still 1255mm. Thats actually in line with a lot of other size large bikes after the 180mm fork and all that.
This is what some buddies of mine have liked...and some are in the industry and get a new bro-bike all the time. They like the slacker HTA and extra wheel base (mostly) but not all the reach. They get the stability without losing dynamic range of movement on the bike. But that's not what the marketing departments are selling, likely because it just means you need a -2 from Works. Also, stack is part of length as well, I'm a proportional 6-4 and stack/risers are awesome for me at times more than length. You get wheelbase but also a ton of extra leverage to use it.
Visit geometrygeeks.com and spend hours checking bikes from different MY with compulsive brooding over and comparing numbers. Perfect friday night activity ;-)
My heart goes out to all my fellow female riders in the USA that have now once again been reduced to a lesser being by the unreliable and deteriorating government. Both sides of the hall could have prevented all that happened today for generations, however they have chosen not to so as to have a political campaign strategy. Fuck this shit.
What Canyon calls a small has a 460mm reach, their medium has a longer reach than my large Range at 485mm, and their large is a 515mm reach. It's not that weird that Moir rides a small when it's really a medium...
@bashhard: you’re right I don’t, but I chose to support the unsupported. Public forum is just that. Thanks for your feedback though, I am glad to see you are seeing this.
@abueno: Dude, maybe skip a comment section or two with this copy and pasted unrelated to the article woke signaling comment.
Jack has always rode somewhat small bikes in the past but sure seems to work for him. That being said see Seb's Opinion: Why You Shouldn't Care What the Pros Ride article for further review.
@bainer66: maybe respect women enough to understand that a reposted comment might reach someone who doesn’t even know what’s going on, so they can be informed also?
@abueno: everyone who reads or watches any type of news in europe or america heard about it. And it was a long time coming with the judges Trump selected for the supreme court. In short, the USA are f*cked and everyone knows it. Reposting it here does not change a thing. Go and make your vote count in each state so the federal law looks like in California and not like in Texas.
@bashhard: That's why air raid sirens exist. Not everyone is switched on to the news every (or any) waking moment. This is a terrorist attack on an entire gender by fascist religious fundamentalists. No more, no less. It transcends everything. The taliban would be proud.
@abueno: So you are saying that your comment, while inaccurately saying "fellow female" will somehow allow a woman who is looking through the comment section on pinkbike article that is lightly discussing mechanics vs racers ,to all of a sudden clue into this huge issue that has been in every news outlet for a long time, has been a topic of discussion in countries around the world. Get real.
Maybe you should respect the same female riders escape from discussions about her body being presented by men who have no business making decisions in the first place.
I think if you really cared you would be looking for a more direct way to solicit change then copy and pasting a blanket comment in the discussion sections of pink bike articles.
More reach only makes sense on steep trails,any other time it’s a hindrance as you are trying harder to switch weight between wheels when cornering,jumping etc.
Try going through a flat corner with a bike with too long of a front centre and you’ll see what I mean.
I dunno man. I’ve accustomed to long bikes over the years and now everything with less than 500mm reach feels wrong. Whether the bike becomes a hindrance in slow corners entirely depends on how active your riding style is. To me it now feels natural to really throw my weight forward into corners to weight the front wheel. It’s a technique that lets you ride stupidly fast but doing this on any shorter bike immediately results on the feeling of going OTB.
The other article this week said Jack was 6'1" (185cm)? Having never met the man in person, I couldn't argue either which is right. Anyone else know how tall Jack actually is?
Having said that, the man does have quite the length of seat post above the clamp/below the collar. Seems like he could use a 240mm dropper on that frame .
@ocnlogan: ridden with him a few times, I'm 6'1 and he's taller than me by a little bit. I think it's just hit long ass legs that make him look taller, I'd guess he's closer to 6'2-3. Lovely bloke, always has time for the kids/fans.
I'm a smidge over 6'1" and my DH, Sworks Demo 8 2015), has a reach of 440mm, size L and my 2016 Evil Wreckoning has a reach of 452mm. I just built up a new Chromag Roootdown and the reach feels too long (487mm) for me on the size large. I rode the older one before the length increase and felt so fun and playful, easy to hop and manual. This new one is a bit much. It really fights you initially when you go to hop and manual. The long reach takes a lot of the fun out of the bike. Trends pushed by the industry do appeal to all. A lot of pro's still ride bikes from the last gen for this reason. I'll throw in the mandatory "it might be my BMX background" that makes me feel this way, but I do not want to put in immense effort to get the front end up. Having the ability to hop and manual without thinking about it is what I prioritize.
I work in a shop that sells Yeti and Knolly and just can't pull the trigger on a modern bike for this reason. They just don't feel as fun as the shorter bikes of the last gen. When I see all pro riders validating my feelings about this it reminds me how often the industry just pushes new things on us without thinking if they really should (35mm bars anyone?lol)
TLDR; don't believe the hype, a lot of pro riders are not fan of long reach numbers for a good reason.
@willdabeast410: Yeah man, Canyon lools like it might have "Jumped the Shark" with this new Strive. Having to size down 2 sizes is just Crazy. IMHO you are spot on with your points.
@willdabeast410: Good for you man, I guess. Honestly not trying to be a dick, but your entire post essentially boils down to "trust me bro". Which really isn't a good reason behind going around and telling people who disagree that they are wrong and that they should not "believe the hype".
And as Seb Stott has pointed out nicely; "Pro Riders" aren't a good argument for anything.
For reference, all in size large:
Canfield Lithium (1248mm)
Rocky Mountain Altitude (1249mm)
Santa Cruz Bronson (1249mm)
Nukeproof Mega (1251mm)
Norco Sight (1262mm)
Transition Sentinel (1263mm)
Nukeproof Giga (1266mm)
So, while its "small", its not actually all that "small" from a wheelbase perspective.
And yes, I did actually have all those numbers handy in my bike nerd geo sheet
*For devout Christians only...and also whenever it happens to align with the interests of the right billionaire/lobby
Jack has always rode somewhat small bikes in the past but sure seems to work for him. That being said see Seb's Opinion: Why You Shouldn't Care What the Pros Ride article for further review.
Maybe you should respect the same female riders escape from discussions about her body being presented by men who have no business making decisions in the first place.
I think if you really cared you would be looking for a more direct way to solicit change then copy and pasting a blanket comment in the discussion sections of pink bike articles.
Try going through a flat corner with a bike with too long of a front centre and you’ll see what I mean.
Would love to see a bike check of Dim Tordo’s rig, are they riding the same size with Moir and what kind of setup.
Having said that, the man does have quite the length of seat post above the clamp/below the collar. Seems like he could use a 240mm dropper on that frame
For racing, singletrack etc, no not faster at all.
All in all that puts him on a ~455mm reach. At his height. Insanity. The bike must feel like a BMX to him.
if you want to go fast in EWS you are silly to be on a big bike...
Sam hill even openly said the trend of bigger, slacker bikes is dumb
It's great for the Average PB commenter though, long and slack, makes up for all the skill they dont have.
I work in a shop that sells Yeti and Knolly and just can't pull the trigger on a modern bike for this reason. They just don't feel as fun as the shorter bikes of the last gen. When I see all pro riders validating my feelings about this it reminds me how often the industry just pushes new things on us without thinking if they really should (35mm bars anyone?lol)
TLDR; don't believe the hype, a lot of pro riders are not fan of long reach numbers for a good reason.
And as Seb Stott has pointed out nicely; "Pro Riders" aren't a good argument for anything.
My last statement is the most truest of truest ever. Long slack bikes for PB commenters..
Hows your bussssss??