WELCOME TO THE 2022 PINKBIKE
FALL FIELD TEST
5 New Do-Everything Bikes
Words by Mike Levy, photography by Satchel Cronk
This Field Test takes us back to a drier and much warmer time of the year when fall may have arrived but maybe just hadn't quite made it to Whistler yet. Late September saw Mike Kazimer, Matt Beer, myself, and our tireless video team head to the world's most famous bike park... to ride trail bikes. I realize that might sound strange, but we kept it to (mostly) appropriate terrain and also spent a ton of time on trails outside of the park, which are even better but you didn't hear that from me.
I'm not sure if this is the tenth Field Test or the hundredth, but I do know that it was an exceptionally good one. They're all fun and all hard work, sure, but it's rare to have the moving pieces line up so well: warm weather, a bunch of good bikes, some of the best trails in the world, and everything just thirty minutes from home up a twisty seaside highway with a Tim Hortons on the way. Life is good, isn't it?
Another factor in that goodness is that we were riding a bunch of the newest trail bikes, easily the most interesting category in my mind. Most of these get-togethers see us on bikes that prioritize one aspect of the ride far more than another, with the cross-country and enduro editions getting more focus on either climbing or descending for obvious reasons. At the Value Bike Field Test, they just need to keep us from yelling, "ALHONGAAAAA" too many times, while at the Downcountry Field Test, they just need to, er, downcountry well...?
Point is, these five 130 to 150mm-travel bikes have to be pretty damn good at each of those things without being allowed to suck at one to benefit another. And doubly so when you consider that some of them cost many duffle bags full of money. I love me an outlier, though, which is why we also brought along a much less expensive option; a bit of perspective never hurts.
As usual, we installed control tires on all of the bikes in order to remove one variable from the equation. This time, those tires were Maxxis' DHR II tires, all with a DoubleDown casing. That thicker rubber does add around a half-pound to the total weight of each bike compared to lighter duty options, but it was worth it for the peace of mind they provided in Whistler's rocky terrain. The total number of flat tires we suffered during the test period? Zero.
How Do We Choose the Bikes?
It all starts with
this simple Pinkbike Poll that told us which bikes you wanted to see reviewed. Aside from using those results to make sure we didn't bring in any of the most requested bikes, this round's fleet needed to be interesting, new, available-ish, and not too expensive. Just joking about that last one, but before you yell at us in the comments that I'm not going to see anyway, consider that we do our Value Bike Field Tests, and also that brands
really want to send us the fancy version of their new anything.
These five bikes are similar in many ways. The difference between the slackest and steepest head angles is just 1.1 degrees, and there's a 5mm spread in chainstay lengths, 18mm in wheelbase, and 7mm at the top tube. As for suspension, the Norco, Trek, Scott, and Yeti all use some variation of a four-bar layout, while the Santa Cruz is our lone dual-link bike. That means it was up to us to parse the differences between similar-ish bikes and a reminder that millimeters matter.
Field Tests are about back-to-back-to yada, yada, yada, comparisons, also strengths and weaknesses, blah, blah, blah, not a shootout, and so on and so forth. But we mostly just rode the bikes a whole bunch on the trails that we wanted to ride them on, which was anywhere and everywhere you might take a bike like one of these. And since we're in our own neighborhood, we may have ended up in a few places where you're not supposed to take a bike like one of these. You know, for science or whatever.
Whistler's mountain biking trailsThe bulk of our testing took place on a fifty-fifty mix of pedal and lift-accessed descents, and mostly on the kind of trails where you'd want to ride a modern trail bike: rough, rocky, and either steep or fast but sometimes both. A Field Test is not the place for us to talk about long-term reliability, of course, but spending all day in the bike park is a good way to rattle loose any problems or concerns that wouldn't have surfaced otherwise. I'm always grateful to have a place like Whistler so close, but end-of-season conditions are no joke; Anthony Messere could hide between some of the braking bumps, and the tinder-dry conditions make for fun riding but also summer speed with winter traction, if you catch my drift... Which I definitely didn't about half a dozen times during our two-week stay.
If you think more editors put their hands up to volunteer for the Whistler Field Test than the Tucson edition, you'd be wrong. Kazimer rules with an iron fist and no one else gets to decide anything, but he let me come because I promised to do the efficiency test and not talk about aliens more than once an hour. Matt Beer joined us for testing and filming to make it a trio, but he was also there for his own round of downhill bike testing that I'm probably not supposed to mention yet.
We're blessed to be traveling the world to ride bikes - namaste, of course - but that also means we feel extra-namasted when we get to test bikes on our backyard trails. When we weren't trying to keep Matt in our sights on the mountain, Kazimer and I not having to share a bunk bed for the first time was another huge plus. Or bummer, depending on your perspective.
And without Satch Cronk, Maxon Barron, and Stefan Licko, AKA our photo and video team, on hand to document it all and ask for a 23rd take, none of this would be possible. Actually, without them, it'd just be Kazimer, Matt, and I having a ton of fun while doing whatever we wanted, riding really expensive bikes that we don't own in the bike park all day, playing Catan for hours at night, and relaxing in the hot tub while listening to Bob Seger's best two songs on endless repeat.
Mike LevyHeight: 5'10" / 178 cm
Weight: 150 lb / 68 kg
Notes: Tech editor, knows the aliens are here
Mike KazimerHeight: 5'11" / 180cm
Weight: 160 lbs / 72.6 kg
Notes: Managing tech editor, the reasonable one
Matt BeerHeight: 5'10" / 178 cm
Weight: 170 lb / 77 kg
Notes: Tech editor, fast... and late
The 2022 Fall Field Test is presented G-Form
Any of these options feel better than spending $10k on a bike.
Thankfully there are a lot of options now where bikes don't cost an arm and a leg and still rip thanks to brands like Norco, Marin and even the big S if you look at their Status bikes.
I used to have a 3rd gen with a 3" lift, SCS wheels w/ 33" KO2's, ARB bumper. Beast of a truck, with abysmal gas mileage and I was doing way too much highway driving to keep it.
Sadly Norco is 5209 euros plus 60 euros postage to Finland. Finlands VAT is 24 % and bike24 has to charge it from customers ordering from here. Okay, it's still "cheap" compared to those other bikes in this test with our VAT. Trek fuel is 12 471 euros
Going to hang on to my Ripmo AF for a long time.
However I spent $5k on one (2k more than I wanted to spend) and it was money well spent! So if 10 or twelve thousand is in your pocket, you will be happy with your purchase. I recently reached the place where I felt how a top tier shock can keep the rear tire closer to the bumps than the lower-level model does. oh-what-a-feeling
Thought it was weird clapped out Japanese 4x4 time lol
By that time, the new Toyota Stout will likely be available. Make sure you're first in line!
No headset cable routing... Tick
Alloy frame... Tick
Threaded bottom bracket... Tick
Solid spec... Tick
Not stupid expensive... Tick
Norco don't make e-bikes... Hang on, they do. Dammit I said I'd never buy a bike from an ebike maker. I hate my stupid principles sometimes. Next.
*sarcasm btw*
And you could buy that, upgrade the fork and maybe the wheels and still have a lot of cash left to go on an Alp or Whistler trip. Or just heat your house this winter.
Also check the RD slop between NX and XO1 out of the box, dramatic difference.
Just warrantied an XTR shifter after 20 months of normal use (~2k miles). Shortest life span for a shifter I’ve ever had.
If she wasn't wearing a helmet she would be dead.
www.gofundme.com/f/alicia-and-her-family-with-medical-costs
www.instagram.com/p/ClurLFgOYhP
TBI's are brutal, though. Even in the best case scenarios, recovery is a long, slow process.
I was at this Field Test for the beginning before leaving to ride bikes in Bellingham, where I crashed, so my heart goes out to these guys for still making the FT happen. They're amazing.
I'll be back, as soon as I can be! I miss these people. All the best!
Edit: to anyone who owns a camry you made a wise choice. I should have gotten one to be completely honest.
Of course, some running shoes now cost $250 and might last 250 miles. :-)
With how inflations going 4k for a no bullshit spec is certainly something to lust over. Good brakes, Good drivetrain, good suspension for a reasonable price certainly beats out the 10k carbonium
Still, cut it out PB. No one wants it.
(yes, this is sarcasm)
Lets not start on the rear shocks either.
I would love to do more testing but if I was on the market - my money would not go to RS.
On the other hand, the trail bike I have has cheap RS Gold 35 from 2021 - it blows mind in comparison to top-notch Fox 36 from 2012 I used to have
RS stuff works great at WC level where it gets broken down and new bushings every other race....as well as the very conservative rider(my wife) who never punishes stuff.
If you want to ride hard and do a normal amount of maintainence, its Fox or Ohlins.....or Intend if you have a trust fund. lol
And, they’re acutely aware of the kind of blow back they’re gonna be getting so they’re already talking value and it’s only the trailer!
They read the comments, they know what you’re thinking before you think it..
Right, but these guys read and learn! This is where I see their testing methods improve over the years. Check out an old bike test on PB. Like a REALLY old one.
I ride a Canfield Lithium, and my new sled, a Zerode Taniwha, neither is built up fancy, lots of reused parts, new value ~ 5-6k, and they ride awesome!
Of course both bikes weigh 36#, but I’m getting a good workout, so it’s all good !
More to the point, if you are comparing a 5k bike to a 10k, let's recognize that there's no significant difference in performance that justifies the additional cost.
So yeah, if you are complaining about spending 5k on a performance full suspension enduro bike, then you need to shop used, drop your expectations, grow a pair and ride a hardtail, or change to a sport you can afford.. hiking is cheap
PS the moto comparison and talking about what you paid ten years ago is an old argument, time to put that old man silliness to bed. At 4k, that Norco is perfect for 99% of riders.
I can buy lots of great bikes with similar builds and weights for $5k.
I gotta say though, what a generic selection of bikes, compared to last year.
The last few tests have included a few "interesting" bikes, last year had the Raaw, the ghost, the propain
Just as feedback, I really appreciate when you review a couple less mainstream bikes.
There's a lot more relevant bikes in here than in last years' test. This selection does a very good job at representing the most popular options that 90% of riders will look at when searching for a mid-travel trail bike.
If this were a car enthusiast site, it's little like reviewing 5 different Toyota Corollas. Sure it might be what most people are actually in the market for, just not as interesting as when they mix things up a little.
Kazimer, glad to hear the thought was there anyways!
and if you are only counting three links, the frame is also a link (ground link)
They really do think the customer is that dumb (and apparently they are that dumb) to be sucked in by GX AXS. (Which by the way is going to be obsolete sometime in the next two months)
And I enjoyed Levy's intro writing. Well done.
And I know the "right" choice is "up to you" and whether you want "stability" or """""nimbility"""" but let's be real?
… and they are available right now !!
weak candy ass mf
Do you see that your comment history is consistently nasty and brings nothing to the discussion, or is that completely lost on you? Why bother being so negative everywhere and all the time? You could just not come here or at least not comment?
Is it just me?
dirtbikemagazine.com/amp/honda-crf300l-vs-kawasaki-klx300-dual-sport-video-series
With all that being said...MTB companies almost purposefully overspend on R&D, production costs and wasteful advertising nonsense that 'helps' them inflate the mystical retail expenses in MTB.
Brand new 2022/2023 Scott Genius ST 900 Tuned - $11,000
Brand new 2022 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 - $12,899
Somebody is going to go on about scalability, target market, blah, blah, blah. I get it all. I studied economics in college. It still just blows my mind how the gap in pricing has closed.
Unsure who has a spare $10K USD (~$13,500 CDN) for a fun hobby? Still more expensive than every car I've purchased in 37yrs.
Here's the review link: www.pinkbike.com/news/pole-evolink-140-review.html
There's also a review of the updated 1.4 as well: www.pinkbike.com/news/the-original-game-changer-just-got-better.html
Trek used to offer the alloy Fuel EX 9 with alloy, XT and good suspension vs the EX 9.7 (same price) with carbon but cheaper components. It was a no brainer for me to go with the EX 9. Still is.
Based on this - I think the Fluid FS A1 is an ideal bike. Looking forward to the review.
Of course I am making generalizations, but this is what I observe the overwhelming majority of the time. I am not saying that expensive bikes are bad, or people who spend lots of mulah on bikes are lame or anything, but why not make these reviews relatable to the PB readers? The budget bikes reviews are no good either. That is just the other end of the spectrum, and most readers aren't interested in a base build (see above, "because we ride a lot"). Why not just review bikes that are in that $3-6K sweet spot, where you get a lot of bang for your buck?
But it all comes down to priorities. I see countless $10k bikes every time I'm at a popular local trailhead, endless carbon wheels, AXS or XTR, and even EXT shocks etc. A lot of people that live here chose it specifically for the riding, so it's a big priority for them, and an expensive bike is nice to have when a lot of your life revolves around using it. I think one of the local shops has sold a whole bunch of much, much more expensive e-bikes!
Also, as we've said many times, including in the video and article above, sometimes we're at the mercy of what the brands have available or are willing to send us. The "media bikes" are often high-end for obvious reasons.
It blows my mind how many Arrival's, Druid's, Dreadnaught's, Enduro's and SC's (often with EXT's shocks and forks) there are around my local trails.
I don't love how expensive bikes are these days, but there are no shortage of people willing to spend the money companies are asking. At least not around here in Calgary.
I guess I get a little concerned about the direction of the sport.... is it trending towards these super expensive builds? I think about where skiing is right now and there are so many people getting literally priced out of that. MTBing has this raw and wild nature to it, like skateboarding and BMX, that I would hate to see go away because a large segment of dedicated athletes and families can't afford it, or don't prioritize earning at the top income tiers.
Not to mention, I am raising a rabid junior DH racer and bike park rat, and have to keep a close eye on the budget as he is going through a frame every other season now haha
$9700, $10,200, $10750, $11,000
Article by Kazimer on a buyers market coming:
www.pinkbike.com/news/opinion-the-pace-of-change-in-the-mtb-world-is-slowing-down-and-im-all-for-it.html
Any thoughts on a retraction or rewrite??
I really 'wish' there are more control options for the bikes that are being tested... like other than the manufacturer Frame, pivot design and tune, really you're then comparing other OEM parts.
Norco says: ,,HULK SMASH!”
Was a good field test.
No. Way
No. Freaking. Way
Impossible.
1 duffle bag full of money = $1k (universal currency) = 1 gold tooth.
m.pinkbike.com/buysell/3463297
www.scott-sports.com/us/en/product/scott-genius-st-900-tuned-hmx-frame-fork?article=292051010
What this mean?
And to prove my point as soon as you pick a winner of that bike test there, it is going to be an advertisement for that bike at the top of Pinkbike.com Coincidence? I think not..
So which one of the bike companies in this test greased Pinkbike enough to be the winner? Curious minds want to know?
Dude, you need therapy; you're holding on too tight.
#30 and 160mm. Done.