It's all fun and games, but why do the blue trails get a bad rap? We find, they are often looked past because they aren't "gnarly" enough to warrant throwing our bodies down them. Well, to show just how fun they can be, as well as how impactful blue trails can be for our skills on the bike, Christina Chappetta hits a lap near home and rides some trails you may have even heard of before!
Link to the lap here incase you want to check it out for yourself.
If we're talking about more flowy blue flow trails, I think part of it is that they're friendly for beginners but also come alive for proficient riders who can go fast, rail corners and find gaps. If you're somewhere in the middle, where you no longer need such a sense of safety but also don't have the speed and flow, a blue trail could be a bit boring for you.
The skill required to hit doubles on a hand built flow trail is very high. There is a lot of progression required to get to that point where the trail can be pretty boring (and you likely rode it 25 times as a beginner).
@schili: Progression is the real thing here I think. I find myself in between trails often, but if a trail system has progression built into it well, than whatever the color trail we zoom in on will have it's spectrum of ability learning on it or pushing their limits on it. Personally, I like me some blue zoomers, but the holistic perspective on trail networks is where it's at. Maybe we can get @christinachappetta to do a sequel????
@schili: depends on the trail. At my local xc loop we try to provide challenges for every skill level, including gappable obstacles that don’t require nico vink levels of pop. A novice would roll a jump, whereas an intermediate rider could consider doubling it and an advanced rider could land at the next roller/berm/bank etc.
I've found that how fun a trail is oftentimes has no correlation with the difficulty. IMO trails of all difficulty can be super fun, and I'm not ashamed to thoroughly enjoy a green trail, despite being more on the "very dark blue" side of the skill spectrum.
My local trail system has a green trail that is honestly one of my hands down favorite trails I've ever ridden. Its not difficult, has no mandatory jumps/gaps, and no big features. But the layout and gradient is just about perfect, and while its nice and flowy, it has enough roots/rocks to keep things interesting. Every time I ride it my brain thinks I'm on a speeder bike on Endor (and there is my daily SW reference ).
On the flip side, I am less likely to like trails that feel "forced" into a difficulty level, with features that seem out of place.
@schili: how are you defining intermediate? I love a good blue trail and I consider myself intermediate. My skill level is not quite to steep double blacks, I love a good black that’s like 50-60% grade and I love a good blue jump trail that has up to 30 foot jumps. Doubles and tables are good, if it’s a big gap jump them I’m out.
To me this is intermediate and blue is right up my alley. Especially bike park blue. Public park double black in my area is bike park blue so maybe that helps. I still would consider myself intermediate tho.
@ridingbiking: “ 50-60% grade” That is incredibly steep for a trail, maybe you mean for a section like a long rock roll section? I am not aware of a continuous trail that is 50-60% grade that wouldn’t be considered a proline. But then again, I am only an intermediate so what do I know. But when I have ridden that pitch on my snowboard it has always been in no-fall experts only sections.
@NERyder: 50% grade not 50degrees although 50% grade is still 26 degrees according to google which most people would be surprised how steep a 30 degree ski run actually is but not no fall zone on a snowboard type steep
@NERyder: all I know is what garmin tells me. I’ve ridden or tried to ride 70% grade and it’s pretty fing scary for me but I have friends who do it often.
@ocnlogan: Truth! Trail building is best looked at from the perspective of "what is the most fun trail we could build on this terrain?" not "how could we make this terrain into a blue/black/double black trail?"
@CobyCobie: yeah for sure. I’m talking max grade of a trail. Like windrock bike park in TN has some short sections of a very high grade like 60-70%. It’s extremely steep.
40% grade is a lot more maneable for a black and easier for me. 50% or so is like my max comfort zone even for like a 75 foot section of trail. Beyond that my fear of heights starts to kick in lol. Idk how downhill racers do it.
Also the reality is I could be wrong what I’m getting grade wise. In short, I’m comfy up to single black steepness. Double blacks are a bit scary to me.
@ocnlogan: I am 100 percent in agreement with you. I'm past that part of my riding life where I'm trying to improve and go bigger, faster, stronger. I just want to enjoy it and the trail rating is only a small part of the equation.
@ridingbiking: I don't know where you get your grade % but a sustained 40% trail would be incredibly steep - In fact, I don't even know if that exists. For reference, the Val Di Sole WC DH track is about 25% grade and is known as a steep track on the DH circuit. www.trailforks.com/trails/black-snake-33899
Same reason why 'intermediate' riders geek out / get the most serious with bikes/parts - new riders don't know any better and experienced riders know better.
So very true. How many people google 'the best xxxx' and stress over whether the XTR or XT is the better brake for example or if this helmet is better than that helmet. Whereas the experienced riders just buy whatever is on sale. lol
@Longrider: Some of the best riders I know have never serviced their fork, and run the baldest minions. The skilled riders can ride anything on a 2013 hardtail, or A-line on a gravel bike.
Intermediate riders gain the most from good equipment IMO. The difference between and intermediate riding a trail and going OTB could be the geometry modernization between 2017 and 2021.
I don’t disagree, but it’s also true that at the highest level a lot of people absolutely obsess over setup, components, etc. See Greg Minnaar, for example.
@Rich-Izinia: For sure, top paid pros need to but non-paid riders, the fastest dudes I know ride whatever they can get their hands on and simply don't care.
@schili: I see where you are coming from but at the same time many intermediate riders think it's the bike when it's really their skill....they'd be better off buying more lift tickets, going on a cycling holiday, getting training and just riding more on their older bike vs constantly upgrading....
I do 100% agree with your first point though....any trip to Whistler is a perfect example of that!
If you're a fussy or particular person, you're a fussy or particular person. I am and have everything mm perfect, although I've seen a lot of examples of what @schili is talking about. When I was a kid and penniless I had the cheapest thrown together bikes though, and I broke a lot of them.
@schili: I think you are right. I'm admittedly a very mediocre rider, and for me, things like tire choice make a really big difference if I can actually enjoy a more technical descent or just get down there by the skin of my teeth. For me that's ok though - I don't have as much time as I would like to be actually out and ride (job, kids and all that), so I enjoy the process of nerding out on gear.
Natural trails are my choice. The groomed trails are fun occasionally but since any skill can ride them they are too packed with people, the old janky "hiking" trails with no berms and no flow unless you have the skill to find it, are a blast.
I couldn't agree more. It really seems like modern mountain bikers only want to ride perfectly sculpted, machine built flow trails. Not many people want to ride anything challenging anymore.
I dislike blue trails because they are often made by sanitizing perfectly good trails. They are often one line, they remove the creativity of finding its own line, the satisfaction to overcome a challenge. they are a sad illustration of a society that prefers to destroy nature for immediate, easy, and lazy satisfaction. It's amusement park vs the thrills of adventure. Do we really need more comfort and sanitize environment? I personally mountain bike to momentarily escape this other world. If I want easy quick gratification, I watch Netflix and eat ice-cream.
yup. this. when options for building trails are limited (due to land ownership/management issues), and an organization takes all your favourite trails and sanitizes them by dumping dirt over roots and rocks, and putting berms in every corner, riding becomes boring, the challenge is gone. Riding for me is almost like solving a puzzle. Those days that I manage to solve the puzzle are rare, and the sense of accomplishment is high when I put it all together. And then someone comes in a fills in all the difficulties to make it easier to solve the puzzle?! that's cheating! kinda like e-bikes.... ;-P
@slyfink: most of the trails in my area are visible bermed corners. I thought I was an ok intermediate rider, I travelled to a new system with a long trail that had several blind-ish flat corners. I wiped/slid out twice and i put my foot down and did unintentional 270° drifts the other 2 times. Berms make trails fun/flowy/faster, but they make you think you are better at cornering/braking then you really are.
I hear you breathing bud. But there is room for all types of trails. Here in Whistler there are newly constructed trails with more underway off the Cheakamus Lake road (aka East Side Main FSR) that are intermediate level and super fun at speed. These trails don’t intimidate my new to riding friends. These trails are great for new riders to progress on. Many of the black or double black trails in that zone are way over a beginners head.
I took my friends to Squamish to ride Pseudo Tseuga and they loved it. I told them that if they could ride Flashback in Cheakamus that they would have fun in Squamish.
@slyfink: Something tells me you're referring to the Missing Link / Skyridge / Happy Valey trails in Gatineau Park. Used to be tech to the point of jankiness in sections. Now it is so easy I have a hard time getting motivated to ride there.
The best trails that are in the most interesting places and longest are generally going to be blacks unless you're riding in a place with huge resources to build blues way out back, because they're labour intensive. Half the fun in riding a good black is that they often come with a long climb, a great view and a feeling of getting away from it all and into the hills. And there is a longer decent and true sense of success at the end. The kind of trail that feels like it's been going on forever, you stop and feel the quiet of being in the woods and you still have 5minutes more decent and half an hours ride home. I don't see why an intermediate rider whos just getting good enough to pick their way down a trail like that shouldn't be trying to do that as often as possible.
You could build more blues like this, but it will cost you 4 times as much to do so and it's much more destructive to the natural environment that you're trying to get out into. Being able to go ride trails like that and enjoy them is part of the journey and the achievement of mountain biking, if you're not good enough to do so then you need to get better, not have the trails dumbed down for you.
@Geriatric-J: That's one of them. Monique's is another. I hear a great way to spice them up is to get a gravel bike... I've also seen a bunch of e-hybrids out on the trail...
IME, all of the bad accidents occur on the Blue trails because riders can get going so fast, and quite easily.
Black trails are safer, there, I said it!
My local town is the perfect example. Caters to beginner riders, builds lots and lots of flow trails, the joey's wreck themselves in astounding numbers. Its amazing how skilled some are at taking a trail with no risk whatsoever and breaking themselves off on it.
@gmoss: I totally agree with you that roots and technical trails conduce to lower speed and are thus generally safer. But then, from many bikepark perspectives, roots are not what sells ticket to the average rider, on the contrary. Smooth trails, berms and jump on the other hand... It is quite hard to explain to an beginner/intermediate rider that he would be much safer on tech trail than going 40km/h on a smooth straigthline.
@jlb1: I get it, but this isn't even on bike park trails. Trail systems being "maintained" by bike park mentallity, and trying to turn downs into bike park sections. I get so mad when I head downa fun section, ready for a set of roots that require some thought to handle at speed, only to have them dug up and dirt put in place. These aren't big steep descents, but longer gradual descents that allow you to carry some speed, but more than some should due to smoothness/easiness. Can't change it though, it is the prevailing thought here.
The real crime is dumbing down the intermediate trails and some blue trails into blue and green. Big trend here to sanitize trails into flow, bermed stuff that you barely need susp for. Lost lots of good roots to pop off of on blue trails gone!
With bigger and more capable bikes on the trails these days, able to ride over tech more efficient, it's strange that there is this trend to remove tech from the trial.
@imbiker: Because lots of riders ride big bikes to go faster, incorrectly equating speed to flow, and suspension/geo to skill. Less skillful people can ride faster on sanitized trails with big bikes.
It's true that I begin to see a trend where I live that blue trails = flow trail. It's like impossible now to have a blue trail that has moderatly any obstacles (some roots, small rock garden etc ...). I'd even say that where I live you have to ''risk it" in the single diamonds if you want an initation to technical terrain. It's kind of sad
@imbiker: I think over all, the average level of skill in mountain biking has dropped significantly. This is a good thing, because it means that there is a huge influx of new riders.
Yes! I don't understand dumbing down writhing into flow trails. People get these long travel enduro bikes, and only want to ride trails they are as smooth as the sidewalk. Mountain bikers are becoming soft.
Ironically I think the blue flow trails around here (Squamish) are pretty well the same as many trails in the likes of the UK, and probably loads of other places too. Just loads of berms and 'whoopy bumpy things'. I can't remember any trails like that when I first rode here in 2007, but as that style of riding became more popular elsewhere, the same happened here.
@wake-n-rake: yeah the blues here in Canberra are like that too. At my local (Majura) the greens are much tougher with roots, rocks and tight turns and shit everywhere.
some of the blues at places like Snowshoe...have these jump/gaps that are intended for smaller distances...but the more you ride them you're like "man if I rip this corner and pump a little harder, I could hit that transition way down there from this lip up here..." which makes it all worthwhile.
Agreed, and then once you're used to it, nothing unlocks the fun of black trails like a hardtail. It becomes much less about charging and more of a puzzle to ride it smooth.
I consider myself an advanced rider and I don't like blue trails at all. Probably because I only have few trails nearby that are actually hard and I ride a lot of blue trails every ride I do. They get really boring after some time if all you do is rail big berms.
I'm definitely an intermediate rider and blues are my favourite. I'm sure I could handle black trails, but I just don't care. I just want to have fun and get work out.
@honda50r: about which part? I hope you're not just trying to stir up shit. I know what I like riding. I'm almost 45, I have no desire to impress anyone.
@BermJunky: yielding to uphill riders is a stupid rule. Even if the uphill rider has a bell, the dh rider is not going to hear them until they are on top of them. When climbing you can easily hear someone coming down even if they don’t have a bell. Also why ruin someone’s flow, just be a nice person and let other people have fun. The uphill yield rule seems like some 80’s XC rider thing that has stuck around for some reason, maybe getting started again on climbs was hard with toe clips but with flats or clipless it’s not bad.
@xciscool: stupid rule, eh? Sounds like you practice solid trail etiquette. Nobody is ruining anyone’s fun. It’s your job to be aware of other riders (and other users) presence. The same could be said about your comment…just be a nice person and let other people have fun.
@xciscool: it's more about safety than anything else. For actual bidirectional trails (not fun DH trails that just aren't marked DH only) you do not want the downhill rider to be empowered to blow through blind corners and hit people. The point of yielding to the uphill traffic is to encourage you to ride at a speed where you can stop when needed. Obviously with good sight lines and friendly people, it's nice for the climbers to pull over and let the dh rider flow through. And for trails that are mostly ridden downhill, it would be nice for anyone going up to recognize that riders might not be expecting them, and proceed with a bit extra caution.
@BermJunky: I usually yield in both directions. Yield to the DH rider because why ruin their flow, and yield to the climber because why ruin their flow?
Also, I am a very advanced rider, so getting going again in either direction isn't a big deal. But I agree that the "yield the uphill" is a stupid rule.
I also hate encountering eBikes riding up trails at speed, worse when they are directional.
@JSTootell: Yeah it is contextual, not always a strict rule. Group vs individual, degree of incline, difficulty of re-starting, all that factor in. Except for e-bikes which will get buzzed in either direction.
@xciscool: well, maybe some weirdos (not my case) have fun going uphill, so why ruin someone's fun? I've been in sea to sky area and in my case, and having ridden both directions trails just as a mean to get to the top and bomnb down something gnarlier, I can say it sucks when some idiot doesn't yield to the uphill rider. Stopping uphill takes away a much harder to gain momentum and flow. And all for some dick going down the easiest trail down...
@xciscool: Absolutely agreed. Back in the old days, we just weren't shredding downhill like we do today. But now, I feel like the rule should be reversed. It's often hard or impossible to stop safely (or without skidding) to let an uphill rider through if you're going at a pace that's fun. And for the uphill rider, stopping is so much easier and safer. It's a question of which one has the most kinetic energy to suddenly reel in. I mean don't get me wrong, I'm absolutely not shredding 2-way trails like I would on dedicated DH trails, but I don't want to have to creep down anything for fear I would have to stop suddenly around every bend. And also, I pick my spots. If I'm coming down something and a climber is about to tackle a tough techy bit, and it's easy enough for me to stop, I stop. I don't want to harsh anyone's buzz. I just wish the rule was made more sensibly given the way we ride now.
@BermJunky: I have no problem yielding to anyone, and most two way trails in my area have hikers so I’m not going full send around blind corners anyway, but if I’m climbing some singletrack and I hear people coming down I find a safe section and get off the downhill line, or if it’s wide enough for 2 riders to pass I pick a side and don’t just sit in the middle of the trail completely oblivious.
@BermJunky: another reason Bropeds suck. Trail etiquette is for non motorized users at non motorized speeds. Riders going up trails at braap speed negate the reason for yielding to uphill traffic.
Because they are usually built as flow trails, but very rarely do they actually flow. Half Nelson is a good example. Poor understanding of speed, momentum and trajectory will ruin any flow trail, green blue or black.
Same here. There are only a few black trails that I feel totally confident on, others Im still a little sketchy on. All the blues though, I can just let loose and have a good time on.
@AltaSki: Yeah, I'd expect this kind of comment from an Alta skier ha. If you're able to jump around, hit any feature, and just dick around confidently on a blue trail then you're at least an intermediate.
@Takaya94: Wrong, you're not an intermediate rider until your ego is too big for blue trails and you have to ride blacks to prove you're an apex two wheel predator.
@bikes-arent-real: I get that, and I do ride black tech lines regularly. I tend to avoid the bigger jumps however, not because I'm not confident in my ability, but because I'm the main provider for my family and I care more about staying healthy for them than I do about going huge on a bike. I know everyone has a different rationale on that, but I really don't want to make them have to go hungry or have to pick up extra work because the blue trail wasn't gnarly enough. Not throwing shade on people who do ride black jump trails, but it's not for me.
Green, blue, black. I don’t care. You can go fast in all of them. If you are with a friend who has never been to a bike park and you have a season pass to said park, you learn to love all the trails. I say the best green trail I’ve ridden is still at snow summit. Though trestle bike park system is actually prime. It has a main green trail and it has trails that fork off to the side. Well unless you plan on riding banana peel. The best blue trails are at Trestle bike park. And mammoth has some really nice black trails. I’m speak USA wise of course.
The thing people don’t realize is there’s always a gap feature no matter the trail level. Like even the skill builder trail at mammoth can be fun.
100% agree that you can go fast and have fun on all of them. Even a green trail, like Roly Poly at Trestle is fun if you ride it fast enough.
I would agree that Trestle has good blue trails, but I wouldn't say they are the best even in CO. I rate the blues at Snowmass and Vail higher personally. Vail especially because the dirt is sooooooooo much better there. Even Steamboat has better blues in my opinion, but their problem is they just need more variety. Trestle's blues can be a bit too flat in places. I mean, even Trestle DH has weirdly flat parts too, but the blues could stand to be a bit steeper overall. I suppose that makes them a little more accessible or uninitimidating.
Trestle is mediocre at best, most of the blues (and many other trails) are mindless dull affairs. Lower Radio Flyer at Vail is a great example of how a blue flow trail should be built.
@catweasel: you are looking at it as an intermediate rider. If you can’t look at it as a beginner or and expert then you can never teach others to enjoy it. Like the best in terms of scenic blues is hands down Top of the World at mammoth. But it’s flat. Like flat enough where I would consider it Green. Heck, I would consider Kamikaze a blue because you just hill Bomb the mountain.
Snow valley has the worst blue trail. It’s flat and nothing scenic. Now if we talk about pure ride experience something that would make you stfu. It’s Talladega at Windrock. It’s a blue trail, that I wouldn’t consider blue if you compare it to most bike park. But would I willing take “fresh meat” down that trail. No, because it’s not intermediate in the slightest.
This is how people need to look at this topic. A blue trail needs to be the trail bridges the gap. It ropes the rider to want to come back for more. As it provides very safe versions of the trails flag ship, YouTube making, black diamond trails. If you can’t have fun with a blue trail no matter what it is, then you’ve lost sight on how to have fun riding a bike.
@kroozctrl: don't know what intermediate means in this context. I'm pretty confident on most double black terrain whatever that makes me. I've ridden blues that are a fun time for anybody from beginner to sponsored pro. I think you are looking at it from the perspective of somebody who hasn't ridden many well built trails. If you want to ride amazing blues go to Europe, US trail building is a ways behind
This x 100. I consider myself an intermediate rider and some of the most fun I have in the bike park is chasing my advanced friends down blue trails, and also riding with beginner friends to help them session features and learn/progress on those same blue trails. They're the great equalizer of bike park riding. They allow the whole group from beginner to advanced to ride together and everyone has fun. If it weren't for blue trails we wouldn't have many party laps. Cat's Paw anyone?
Not to mention that a Squamish blue is probably closer to a black in most areas. But yeah so many new ways to look at trails when you start to progress but blues you can still easily control speed!
Yep, BC Blue is indeed a thing. Half Nelson, though, is (or was the last time I was up that way pre-Covid) just a really fun, flowy joy ride. Nope, it's not a techy character builder. Nope, it's not a huge puzzle to figure out line choice and all that. Yes, it's easy to ride with some flow, and then offers better riders the option of dialing it up by going faster/bigger/more creative. It's a bit like ice cream - nope, you wouldn't want to have it all the time, or exlusively. But frankly, if someone can't have fun on that, that may indicate they're just a little bit dead inside.
@g-42: I am with you. I think some of the issue may be the bikes that people are riding. Too long and slack can probably take some of the fun out of blue trails.
This article is money! Good blue trails are a guilty pleasure of mine. I love finding mini rythm sections in blue trail braking bumps, and jumping them. Over-jumping little tabletops to a downslope, or bunny hopping over the last big bump to a downslope.
I feel like James Stewart on blue trails sometimes, NGL. Take me to an actual super-steep trail though and it's not as fun because I ride like 'I have to be at work on Monday.'
my worst injury came on a blue trail. wound up off work for 3 months. 18 months in, and I'm still recovering. non-tech + high speeds = worse crashes that are potentially life altering. all it takes is a split-second of inattention.
@slyfink: my worst bike injury happened on a bike path with freshly installed 800mm wide bars. I went to pass a pedestrian and clipped a fence post and endoed. I broke a floating rib, and was out of work for 2 months. That was my first and last time riding with 800mm wide bars. I also pass people a lot more cautiously, and pretty much prepare to make a complete stop in those types of scenarios now too.
This helps relieve my guilt for enjoying myself so much on fun/well engineered blue trails. Blacks can be fun too, but going and just ripping a blue can be such a good time and would agree it becomes under valued due to egos.
I think of blues as fun with less risk, and that allows me to go faster. I have kids to feed, and I'm not young and invincible anymore, so a lot of black or double black trails just feel too risky to enjoy. Any time a trail sort of forces you to get more than about 3 feet off the ground, whether drops or jumps, I just find myself lacking the commitment to send it, and as a result I don't enjoy it as much. There are great blues at the bike parks here in CO, which have features like rollers that could be doubled if you have the speed or pull up hard, but I tend to keep things low, and often I feel like pumping those instead of jumping is just as fast.
The beauty of mountain biking is that it can mean so many things to so many people. It can scratch whatever that days itch might be. Machine built flow trails have their place, though you'd think from some of the commenting, "too cool for flow trails" dudes that they are somehow evil. I admit I love flow trails. I love the speed, opportunity to hit high speed roller gaps, manualling rollers, the sensation of (what feels like) dragging your cheek on the ground in high speed corners and the fact that they're usually enjoyable at a fast pace on a first time down basis. I call good blues, " zero on gnar, high on fun" and sometimes that is exactly the scratch that needs itching.
Worst than blue trails, are flow trails... Flow is something the rider is supposed to find channel by himself not something that is supposed to be shoved in his throat by a trail builder, Soon we'll get e-bike auto-shifting ABS with giant pads all around trails in the metaverse, welcome to the bubble wrap generation!!
New rider : "Hope I don't OTB!" Intermediate rider : "If I don't OTB, I'm not pushing it hard enough!" Experienced rider : "Can I manual this line? Who needs front wheels anyways..."
My fave trails are 'dark' blue tech flow trails. I love a trail with good variety, but not so steep I feel like I'm just on the brakes nonstop. Pure flow trails can get boring so it's nice to pepper it with some tech to switch it up. There are some great black trails, but I find in BC blacks often get jankier than Id like and I spend a lot of time on edge, I just can't relax on it. Falling on steep rocks is terrible. Double blacks i barely ride mainly cause there's one or two features I may walk and again, riding the brakes is not for me. More advanced blues / chill blacks are blast cause to can let it really go or chill. Also nice to be able to ride with different skills where as harder trails often dont have ride arounds. Just my take.
Without trying to be negative, I completely regretted watching that video. The content was basically just a time filler and of little to no relevance, or maybe I'm just not the right target market... Either way, I hope others got more out of this than I did.
I ride everything but the green trails, blue's to double black. I'm not even sure we have green trails where I ride. Some people I know ride the same trails over and over, can't do it. Variety keeps it fresh and exciting.
I actually feel bad sometimes when there aren't green trails around...like how do people build up and progress if they don't get a good learning platform?! Stoked that for the most part, there are now trails for everyone!
I love smooth flowing laps on blue trails. Sometimes it's fun to enjoy riding and relax a bit vs being in pucker mode thinking you are going to die every 3 seconds.
I don’t always think it is a skill based thing. I don’t know what level of skill I am at. Their was a time when I only wanted to hit the hard stuff to satisfy that adrenaline and Maby ego. Now that I am older some times it is nice to just go for a casual ride just to get out on my bike is a joy
In my experience, the best blue trails have additional elements that more advanced riders can opt into--like the step down in the video--while less advanced riders can side step. When I ride these kind of trails with friends or family with less experience, we can all ride together and enjoy the same trails.
Colour coding the degree of difficulty is poor. Unless there are more of these colours. Why? Because one blue trail is more difficult than another. Same with green, red and black. And on the blacks the difference is much more significant. That's why black diamont and double/tripple black are a better designation in my opinion.
Just get on the right bike to make it fun, if you have the choice. If the trail is very rough, you might prefer bigger wheels and more suspension travel to keep your momentum. If the trail is less rough, you may want smaller wheels and less travel (or a hardtail) so that you can pump and gain speed from the terrain. Not saying you can't ride a decent amount of roots on a 26" wheeled hardtail, but if it is just a nest of roots you can't really pump anymore anyway. You need roots and/or rocks though, always. They keep the trail together and keep people from developing silly speeds to then grip the brakes hard at the mere sight of something challenging (which causes braking erosion, which becomes the challenge that makes other people brake too etc).
Maybe it’s that intermediate riders don’t want to remain intermediate riders? How can they join the elitist, gatekeeping ranks of the advanced if they stick to what’s comfortable all the time?
The only gate is lack of skill. If you have the chops, nobody stops you from going full send. Most riders who choose to mindfully put in the time to progress instead of just pedaling the same way they have for xxxx number of years can get to riding gnar trails in a season or 2.
Meh. Go to a tourist Mecca and it’s the blue trails that are overrun. Sedona-Mezcal is mobbed, Gumbys stay away from H trails. Moab-Klondike, Klonzo and Mag 7 are packed-Gold Bar/Portal, Jackson’s and Rockstacker not so much. A lot of blue riders will SAY they are bored riding the same stuff, but won’t season harder stuff to progress.
That said, I think the main issue with blue trails is they’re often poorly designed. A green trail has to be really, really mellow. A good black trail has fun rhythm but that should include stuff like exposure, mandatory air features and committing tech moves.
Blue trails have to be easy enough for the average Jerry/Gumby/Fred Flintstone to be able to ride, which dictates trail width, steepness etc. A good blue trail is really fun and flowy-with some sidehits that allow expert riders to also party (Mag 7 is a great example). Lousy blue trails lack flow or rhythm (Klondike or Klonzo) or they’re just boring (and costly to maintain) McFlow trails.
Beyond the article itself (which I think is amazing and love the perspective), it has been really cool and refreshing to see you (Christina) in the comments being interactive with peoples opinions even if they don't necessarily agree. It's super cool to see that interaction with the audience.
I think if you're riding trails that can be classified by a colour, has a sign telling you the name of it, and "watch out, jumps n stuff!" then you're at a theme park, not riding a trail
I mostly ride black tech, but I'm also surprised most of the time I hit a blue trail how much fun I have. The ones where you barely have to ride your brakes because of the gradual elevation drop last forever... sometimes that's better than burning through 250 feet of elevation in 1/4 mile lol
I feel like were not an equal representation of mountain bikers here at PB. I'm going to assume were the more engaged rider with more experience than most MTB'ers so our collective opinion shouldn't be taken as a whole representation of riders...
But yeah blue trails are just turning into machine built flow trails. They lose their luster super quick if they aren't built with progression and optional lines. I understand they draw the most riders and offer progression for tons of people, but I'm just tired of them. It also adds to my saltiness.
That being said- whenever I travel the first thing I look for is the most popular blue trail that's NOT machine built to feel out the trail network. "Blue" has a huge span of trail context. The blue trails at my local (RIP Whiteface) park have absolutely zero resemblance to a blue trail just down the road.
Intermediates are more beginner than they think they are and believe a blue trail is beneath them...then they break their collarbone or something else and realize blues are awesome. Rinse and repeat until they are advanced.
Why are you trying to insult intermediate riders saying they have egos and all that. Maybe they just like the fun thrill of riding a black trail, same as the beginner likes the progress from riding blues? Yikes.
I think it's mostly up to the local organizations to add trails to the networks (on TF anyway) and then make the choice on trail rating in comparison to those around them.
Some trail networks around the sea to sky area use the Whistler Trail Standards that have guidelines on the rating of a trail dependant on features, grade etc
@christinachappetta: please write it. I would like more ammo to blow most of them apart!
I don't really have a better system, but maybe we should be adopting something like climbing (or, what I think climbing has) with a bit more subtlety than green/black/blue (red doesn't exist in my world)
@AltaSki: oh right! thats why both my comments got upvoted and yours was downvoted into oblivion by the largest mountain biking community around. Dude, just get off your phone and go ride your bike, you need a break.
When did colored bike trails become a thing? Skiing, yes, always, but biking? Been riding since late 90s, and never heard of a colored trail growing up. Since being in the Pisgah area for quite sometime now, it has only been the past few years, that I recall people even caring about a color rating system. Has it been the recent popularity of biking and bike parks? I’m not here to bash the rating system, just generally curious. Maybe I just never paid attention? I’m sure it probably been the norm worldwide.
Ya I'm with this... fondly recalling the days when trails had no colors and we would just ride around and figure out which trails were what and had fun doing it. Then again, most things on PB make me realize I'm getting old so this is no surprise... and I do agree with the low key burn of this article, roasting all those intermediates who think they're experts and are too cool to ride "blue" trails.
@HeatedRotor: To each their own. Not a fan of "trails" that are essentially groomed pump tracks. Of course I say "ban" in jest. But its kind of lame and boring when every trail in a trail system is nothing but berms, rollers and tables, which seems to be the trend at MTB specific trail systems these days
i guess most readers of pinkbike are more or less intermediate riders. the so called pros, dont bother with new stuff or tech, they just ride better. and the beginners probably never heard of pinkbike.
i'm definetly an intermediate rider and find this article quite offensive.
thanks pinkbike
I’m not sure how you can find it his article offensive but ok. In the grand scheme of things, if you think you’re decently good chances are you’re wrong.
My local trail system has a green trail that is honestly one of my hands down favorite trails I've ever ridden. Its not difficult, has no mandatory jumps/gaps, and no big features. But the layout and gradient is just about perfect, and while its nice and flowy, it has enough roots/rocks to keep things interesting. Every time I ride it my brain thinks I'm on a speeder bike on Endor (and there is my daily SW reference ).
On the flip side, I am less likely to like trails that feel "forced" into a difficulty level, with features that seem out of place.
To me this is intermediate and blue is right up my alley. Especially bike park blue. Public park double black in my area is bike park blue so maybe that helps. I still would consider myself intermediate tho.
40% grade is a lot more maneable for a black and easier for me. 50% or so is like my max comfort zone even for like a 75 foot section of trail. Beyond that my fear of heights starts to kick in lol. Idk how downhill racers do it.
Blues are still great to ride.
For reference, the Val Di Sole WC DH track is about 25% grade and is known as a steep track on the DH circuit.
www.trailforks.com/trails/black-snake-33899
Great article!
Intermediate riders gain the most from good equipment IMO. The difference between and intermediate riding a trail and going OTB could be the geometry modernization between 2017 and 2021.
I do 100% agree with your first point though....any trip to Whistler is a perfect example of that!
When I was a kid and penniless I had the cheapest thrown together bikes though, and I broke a lot of them.
Sadly they are becoming pretty rare
I took my friends to Squamish to ride Pseudo Tseuga and they loved it. I told them that if they could ride Flashback in Cheakamus that they would have fun in Squamish.
Source: My ass
The same could be said about your comment…just be a nice person and let other people have fun.
you're both not wrong...I'd add that two-way trails just suck!
I think yield to climber is a holdover from model T's going up some steep old roads, no? Grapevine or whatever?
also could you guys switch names? thx
Also, I am a very advanced rider, so getting going again in either direction isn't a big deal. But I agree that the "yield the uphill" is a stupid rule.
I also hate encountering eBikes riding up trails at speed, worse when they are directional.
For the record, I often will let the DH rider have the right of way. I’m not a fascist, was merely stating accepted practice.
I've been in sea to sky area and in my case, and having ridden both directions trails just as a mean to get to the top and bomnb down something gnarlier, I can say it sucks when some idiot doesn't yield to the uphill rider. Stopping uphill takes away a much harder to gain momentum and flow. And all for some dick going down the easiest trail down...
The thing people don’t realize is there’s always a gap feature no matter the trail level. Like even the skill builder trail at mammoth can be fun.
I would agree that Trestle has good blue trails, but I wouldn't say they are the best even in CO. I rate the blues at Snowmass and Vail higher personally. Vail especially because the dirt is sooooooooo much better there. Even Steamboat has better blues in my opinion, but their problem is they just need more variety. Trestle's blues can be a bit too flat in places. I mean, even Trestle DH has weirdly flat parts too, but the blues could stand to be a bit steeper overall. I suppose that makes them a little more accessible or uninitimidating.
Lower Radio Flyer at Vail is a great example of how a blue flow trail should be built.
Snow valley has the worst blue trail. It’s flat and nothing scenic. Now if we talk about pure ride experience something that would make you stfu. It’s Talladega at Windrock. It’s a blue trail, that I wouldn’t consider blue if you compare it to most bike park. But would I willing take “fresh meat” down that trail. No, because it’s not intermediate in the slightest.
This is how people need to look at this topic. A blue trail needs to be the trail bridges the gap. It ropes the rider to want to come back for more. As it provides very safe versions of the trails flag ship, YouTube making, black diamond trails. If you can’t have fun with a blue trail no matter what it is, then you’ve lost sight on how to have fun riding a bike.
I've ridden blues that are a fun time for anybody from beginner to sponsored pro. I think you are looking at it from the perspective of somebody who hasn't ridden many well built trails. If you want to ride amazing blues go to Europe, US trail building is a ways behind
That was my first and last time riding with 800mm wide bars. I also pass people a lot more cautiously, and pretty much prepare to make a complete stop in those types of scenarios now too.
Intermediate rider : "If I don't OTB, I'm not pushing it hard enough!"
Experienced rider : "Can I manual this line? Who needs front wheels anyways..."
That said, I think the main issue with blue trails is they’re often poorly designed. A green trail has to be really, really mellow. A good black trail has fun rhythm but that should include stuff like exposure, mandatory air features and committing tech moves.
Blue trails have to be easy enough for the average Jerry/Gumby/Fred Flintstone to be able to ride, which dictates trail width, steepness etc. A good blue trail is really fun and flowy-with some sidehits that allow expert riders to also party (Mag 7 is a great example). Lousy blue trails lack flow or rhythm (Klondike or Klonzo) or they’re just boring (and costly to maintain) McFlow trails.
But yeah blue trails are just turning into machine built flow trails. They lose their luster super quick if they aren't built with progression and optional lines. I understand they draw the most riders and offer progression for tons of people, but I'm just tired of them. It also adds to my saltiness.
That being said- whenever I travel the first thing I look for is the most popular blue trail that's NOT machine built to feel out the trail network. "Blue" has a huge span of trail context. The blue trails at my local (RIP Whiteface) park have absolutely zero resemblance to a blue trail just down the road.
I don't really have a better system, but maybe we should be adopting something like climbing (or, what I think climbing has) with a bit more subtlety than green/black/blue (red doesn't exist in my world)
Lots of meh blues as a result.
I’m not here to bash the rating system, just generally curious. Maybe I just never paid attention? I’m sure it probably been the norm worldwide.