WELCOME TO THE 2021
PINKBIKE FIELD TEST
10 Trail and Enduro Bikes Ridden and Rated
Words by Mike Levy, photography by Tom Richards
The modern mountain bike is an incredibly versatile machine that, depending on a few factors, is probably far more capable than whatever category name we're using to describe it. That's certainly accurate of
the cross-country weapons we reviewed last time around - who knew that 100mm could work so well? - but it's even more true if we're talking about trail and enduro bikes, with many becoming so well-rounded and competent that the lines between them can get a bit muddy. Want an EWS-winning bike that won't feel like a lead sled during your all-day missions and huge climbs? Not a problem in 2020. Looking for a short-travel trail bike that won't kill you while you're trying to chase your long-travel buddies? Yup, there are definitely some of those around as well.
With so many able to do so much, the right thing for us to do was get a whole bunch of them to review; five are trail bikes with differing takes on what matters, while the other five are more likely to be seen at an enduro race or lapping the bike park.
The 2021 Field Test includes ten of the newest, most interesting trail and enduro bikes, all of which saw countless laps against the clock.
How do we decide which bikes to include? While there are no set-in-stone rules, the list needs to have a combination of interesting, important, all-new, or notable checked off, with all ten of our contenders meeting some or all of that criteria. Yeah, we know the bike you wanted to read about isn't here, but we'd rather get to know ten bikes real well than only scratch the surface of what twenty are all about.
While it might seem like the most ambiguous category, you might also say that the name says it it: To be a trail bike, they shouldn't have any issues riding
most trails. Within reason, of course - they don't need to feel cross-country efficient or enduro capable, but it doesn't hurt if they're not far off. And some of the newest examples do exactly that.
Many brands don't just have slightly different takes on what a trail bike should be, they also offer different variants that dial-up certain traits, almost always at the expense of others.
For our purposes, rear-wheel-travel was capped at 140mm, and forks needed to have 160mm or less. We also wanted to include a spectrum of intentions, from classic trail bike vibes to new-school capability.
With its 130mm of dw link-controlled suspension, Ibis' fourth-generation Mojo filled the role as a sporty trail bike, and it also served as a direct competitor to Specialized's all-new, 130mm-travel Stumpjumper. In case you haven't heard yet, it's ditched Horst Link suspension for the first time in ever and is an entirely new animal. Speaking of animals, you can expect Giant's Trance X Advanced to devour climbs with its Fox Live Valve suspension, which is the opposite of what our final two bikes are meant to do. The 140mm-travel Salsa Blackthorn has a 160mm fork and get-after-it geometry, as does the Actofive P-Train that also adds a high-single-pivot and coil-sprung rear-end.
5 Enduro / Freeride Bikes
Our five enduro and freeride rigs are a mix of evolution and all-new, with Rocky Mountain's 160mm Altitude taking the debut headlines when Jesse Melamed rode the fresh bike to victory on its first public showing. And then again a few more times. Hey, at least we know that one goes fast. Trek's very orange Slash is back with more travel and less head angle, and there's also a fresh soon-to-be announced bike in the house for those who like to combine big travel with small wheels.
Wait, did I hear someone just say freeride?
If you're more interested in sending than racing, we've got two 180mm-travel beasts for you to read about. Norco's Shore A1 is a 37lb monster that uses a high pivot, idler pulley, and a whole lot of aluminum, while Propain's carbon fiber Spindrift employs carbon fiber to create a bike meant to do the same job. Both come with a coil-sprung shock, and both surprised us.
I'm not sure which one Kazimer preferred for the skinnies and which one he liked for going fast, but stay tuned to find out.
Nothing beats back-to-back testing and that's mostly what the Field Test is all about, but with Corona keeping Mike Kazimer in America and from joining me in Squamish, this cross-border edition of the Field Test was always going to be a bit different. There's a bit less shit talk because of that, but one thing that hasn't changed is the timing we do; the clock was running nearly every time a bike went out, letting us separate feelings from facts on the climbs and descents.
The film crew: ''Yeah, can you guys try to look better on camera?'' The riding crew: "Yeah, can you guys make us look better?''
Our timed sections were representative of the bikes' intentions, too, with the enduro and freeride rigs facing some serious terrain under Kazimer and the trail bikes not far behind up in Squamish, BC. Yes, I'll always lean towards subjective feel and hastily scribbled post-ride notes over what the clock tells me, but it's neat to see those impressions backed up by cold facts. And especially because timing is one of the last things we do.
One of the first things we do, however, is put all the bikes on matching 'control tires' to try and limit the variables we're dealing with. After all, we want to know how the bike handles and how its suspension performs on equal terms, not on a set of tires that may only last a few months into you owning the damn thing before putting something different on. We decided on Maxxis' Assegai and DHR II tires for the enduro bikes, both with EXO+ casings (Double Down wasn't available in time), while the trail bikes all wore a Minion DHF and Dissector combo with the same casing and sticky compounds. Of course, that'd all be a waste of time if they weren't always inflated to matching pressures.
While all of the bikes had to do plenty of human-powered climbing, nothing beats shuttle runs for timing the downhills.
Aside from swapping to identical rubber, all ten bikes were tested in completely stock form, including the cockpit, seatpost, and any other components. That said, there's a big difference in stock spec between some of our test rigs, with more than $4,000 USD separating the priciest from the least expensive. That's why we focus on overall handling and performance, and also why it's likely that future Field Test series will include some sort of reasonable-ish budget cap.
I mean, are you really surprised when the $12,000 bike is awesome?
NOTE: This year's wide range of prices is thanks to limited availability—everyone is struggling with their supply chains right now, so getting bikes with more evenly matched price tags wasn't possible. That said, we've struggled with pricing every year in the Field Test; brands understandably want to give themselves the best chance at a positive review, so they insist on sending Bezos-priced bikes. That's why next year we're going to implement a hard cap on pricing for each Field Test. I don't know where we'll set that limit yet, but it'll be low enough to make the product managers' jobs harder. We want to actually evaluate their choices rather than just having every bit of unobtanium thrown at the one we try.Rider protection for this year's Field Test is from Dainese, and post-ride brews came from Sierra Nevada.
It wouldn't be a Field Test without a dash of bro-science in both directions from the Impossible Climb, Efficiency Test, and the ever anticipated Huck to Flat. As always, Jason Lucas sent all ten trail and enduro bikes, but you'll have to wait until the end of the Field Test to watch it. Who doesn't want to see these bikes use their travel and then a little more in some Phantom-powered slow-mo pornography?
And if you care at all about what happens on the way up, this year's Impossible Climb proved itself to be literally impossible and we wouldn't have it any other way.
Mike KazimerHeight: 5'11" / 180cm
Weight: 160 lbs / 72.6 kg
Notes: Managing Tech editor, 3x as responsible as Levy
Mike LevyHeight: 5'10" / 178 cm
Weight: 155 lb / 70.3 kg
Notes: Tech editor, patiently waiting for aliens to arrive
With borders closed, travel suspended indefinitely, and it certainly not being the time for group fun, the 2021 Field Test was a bit different than previous editions. So instead of our usual all-encompassing fall extravaganza, this year's was put together by a pared-down video and photography team consisting of Jason Lucas, Max Barron, and Tom Richards who were charged with doing more with less.
As usual, those three did many times the work that Kazimer and myself were tasked with, from riding and filming with a 40lb camera bag all day to then spending all night editing. It's a ton of work, but we all had fun putting these videos together and hope everyone enjoys them. A special thanks also goes out to Ty Deschaine for handling the filming in Bellingham.
Stay tuned for the first Field Test video review that goes live tomorrow, followed by
so many more over the coming weeks!
Previous Welcome to Field Test ArticlesWelcome to the 2020 Pinkbike Field TestWelcome to the 2020 Pinkbike Field Trip - Value Bike EditionWelcome to the 2020 Pinkbike Field Test - Cross-Country Bike Edition
The 2020 Pinkbike Field Test was made possible with support from Dainese apparel & protection, Sierra Nevada refreshments, and Smith eyewear and helmets. Thanks also to Maxxis, Garmin, Freelap, and Toyota Pacific.
SX is the only unacceptable level since it's made out of recycled tractor parts and plastic.
I'm perfectly content with my slightly over-forked Mojo 3, so I won't be doing anything of that. But it's nice that there's an option.
This is very subjective, obviously. I have a Mojo 4 and quite like how it looks, but you're not hurting my feelings.
It does, in fact, get the job done. I went from a 2015 HD3 to the new Mojo 4 and was pleasantly surprised with how much difference the geometry and suspension kinematic updates made.
Also, if you own and/or love how Ibis' look, good for you! They are sick bikes to ride, so maybe you either have better taste than I do, or are just less shallow than I am. Probably both. I'm likely the loser here, missing out on riding a Ripmo every day.
sorry, had to.
How about a PB poll:
Would you prefer to look at
1. An Ibis frame
2. Levy in the XC shootout racing kit
Neither can be unseen so sometime function is not what is important!
Crap I visualized it... probably not fair to Ibis or the internet in general.
On the "budget" for the review in practice it is a good idea but in terms of clickbait I am more likely to look at the other extreme. Refuse to accept anything not top end... send us only your highest bike available to the public or don't bother! Ridicule all bikes under 10k and the seat that didn"t have titanium rails...do we really care if the Honda civic is better then the Toyota Corolla in 2021? More bro science and less of the low+mid range stuff I might actually buy.
If the universe collapsed and mountain biking restarted with the grim donut?
Poor suspension is awful to ride on and a cheap set of wheels wont survive under an even half way decent rider. Mid range everything else is fine but that still sets a pretty high minimum bar.
Not a trend I want to see the bag thingy that is.
geometrygeeks.bike/bike/specialized-stumpjumper-comp-2021
geometrygeeks.bike/bike/actofive-p-train-2021
geometrygeeks.bike/bike/ibis-mojo-4-2021
geometrygeeks.bike/bike/salsa-blackthorn-2021
geometrygeeks.bike/bike/giant-trance-x-advanced-pro-29-2021
geometrygeeks.bike/bike/trek-slash-low-2021
geometrygeeks.bike/bike/trek-slash-high-2021
geometrygeeks.bike/bike/norco-shore-2021
geometrygeeks.bike/bike/rocky-mountain-altitude-carbon-2021
geometrygeeks.bike/bike/propain-spindrift-cf-2021
...and one TBA
Vitus may have the best paint jobs '21
www.mtb-news.de/news/actofive-p-train-cnc-infos-preise
dunno why they are not testing the real thing
So 3400€ sounds fair.
Labour and tools in Germany aint cheap. And taxes..
Around that price point you'll get both carbon and aluminium frames and componentes, drivetrains from NX all the way to XT, and brakes from 2 piston Sram Level's to 4 piston Code's.
I think it would make for a far more interesting field test seeing such wildly varying specs, so someone looking to buy a new bike will be able to extract much more useful information out of such a field test.
Plus the bikes will be in a realistic price point for most people.
$6K is hard to swallow unless you just have a single hobby and don't mind putting every penny toward it.
Fleet looks sick. Can't wait to see some frames bend on the huck to flat!!!
ps- get back on the podcasts!
I was hoping it would be the new nomad
ep1.pinkbike.org/p0pb19699063/p0pb19699063.jpg
My guess is the new Nomad; I've read a rumors about the new Patrol to be announced beginning of next year.
They all look amazing nonetheless, it's interesting to see where this going.
What there is to hope for now?, 27.5 wheels?, what is this, 2014 again?, such a let down.
480mm reach in Large?
Looking at the numbers, this screams "I don't know how to ride but I'm looking cool doing it"
Again, exactly when I had high hopes for SC, after a period where they stopped making bikes for posers...they do it again, directly from the manual "how to be a poser mtb-er in 7 easy steps"
I loathe them again!
Care to explain your last paragraph? ...or don't even bother, it seems that your issue with the brand has more to do with your own perception than with their actual bikes.
Maybe a 27.5 free ride version of the Speshy Enduro?
Megatower is a good bike, especially with cc link giving it 170mm, and a pair of exts. It is f*cking epic, not just good.
As for the rest, of course it is my own perception..what did you expect, your own?
Plus rear end flex is important and beneficial (when done right). Just ask the Starling Cycles guy
It's easier to picture how the fork becomes flexier with wider hubs. The crown has to get wider. When you add a fore/aft bending load at the hub, the crown becomes a torsion bar, and since it is longer, it is flexier. Sorry if I ruined your day.
Adding those wider links is adding weight. The frame itself benefits by being as narrow at the axle, and wide at the anchor point. That gives the best stiffness to weight. That's ignoring the needs of the wheel to illustrate the concept.
If you could make a strut that went straight to the front hub from the head tube, that would be the lightest/stiffest possible "fork" you could make. Unfortunately the wheel gets in the way.
www.pinkbike.com/news/review-2021-specialized-stumpjumper-evo.html
www.pinkbike.com/news/review-2021-kona-process-x-dl.html
I think we'll do a Stumpjumper vs Evo vs Status cage match video soon though.
Anyway, these field tests are great. Keep it up!
Start with the pinkbike editors creating preliminary lists of say, 15 bikes in each category that the manufacturers are able to provide for the field tests. This step lets pinkbike maintain their relationships with the manufacturers.
Then have a reader poll to pick the top 5 bikes that readers most want to see field tested.
From there, let the pinkbike crew get at it with the bikes the readers most want to see.
Every once in a while I look into doing it this way, and then I give my head a shake. It already takes us stupid long to make these things. We'll see...
I don't really need a review of the components (in a field test)… and it would also mute some of the weight differences.
But to answer your question... no I'm not interested in components info in a bike test (this is why they should be spec'd similarly)... I do want to hear about components in a components review or comparison.
We know the bikes with the 38's will be stiffer, we know the bikes with XO will shift and pedal up better, we know the bikes with carbon wheels will have more pop and speed.
Kinda like those S-Works bikes in the XC/DC test... it was hard to differentiate from pure bike performance versus component performance.
Still appreciate the effort and opinions though.
Thanks for the LOL.
Looking fwd to the tests, although it's a tough season to try and buy a bike when so many are out of stock for the next ~6 months. I think Giant has their Trance X available (as of Nov 2020), but it changes quickly.
@mikelevy Good job on your oration: Clear enunciation, steady cadence and enough tonal variation to generate enthusiasm.
How many takes?
Upsized and with a -1⁰ angleset, it rides really nice but I haven't tried a "modern" bike so I can't really compare to anything. But I know for sure they're in the carbon stage of the development of the new carbine, the one isabeau courdurier used at the end of the 2019 season
Needs to be on next year's Field test for sure.
www.mtb-news.de/news/actofive-p-train-cnc-erster-test/?fbclid=IwAR05bhTxjU4sipNHnLu2BmYvpcZH4T5lTwyQ83cDPYsd4Y24k6yKLDIOj_w
Shouldn't as I love the bike, but still
The worst is buying a bike that is then discounted a week later by a large margin, thank covid that ain't happening this time
Any chance we can get a comparison to last years winners? It would be interesting to see how they stack up to this round of bikes.
Looks like something I am forced to do on my 2017 XL framed bike not something from 2020..
Thanks PB ????
@levy
Would I find the Stumpy Evo in S4 too long or just perfect ?
Yes we rode the Bronson in the same size and it feels the best for me.
I love the reach of the S4 just super scared of the wheelbase !
Help please ?
You re the heart of the podcast and what keeps me going back at it every week !
@mikelevy never change, you need to balance out kazimers' professionalism. The holy balance.
Can the next podcast be about the term "pinker" and why brian hates it.
enduro-mtb.com/en/enduro-race-bike-mtb-review
Hate the reach on the S3 but WB wise sounds perfectly maneuverable
Miss sold!
Cant freakin wait for these videos. Even if 26 ain't in them.
Just put my old 26er gnarr track back in today.
Wheel size goes out the window on this trail!
Trail bike: Revel Rascal
Enduro Bike: Evil Wreckoning V3
mikelevy MOD PLUS (Aug 11, 2020 at 13:19)
@JaumeV18: www.pinkbike.com/news/first-look-2020-evil-following.html
It'll get reviewed soon.
So, will anyone dare to say their bike was a "prototype" when if fails the legendary huck to flat?
I absoluetlty love this annual review you guys do. Not sure you can re create the drama of last year, but I lapped it all up. can't wait.
Santa wish list, that Stumpjumper in pain white...... just like the one I have xx
But since when does a trail bike have a 160mm fork?!
Since they already get reviews on PB can we have an e-bike version too?
Let the downvoting commence!
Where are you?
No Specialized Stumpjumper Evo?
No Nukeproof Mega?
No Kona Process X?
Did you upset them with the grim dohnut?
Would have been much more relevant with a Fezzari Delano peak. But I guess personal choice out shines what your audience wants to see.
We review loads of common bikes and will continue to do that, including a new focus on good value. And we also review exotic shit that you'll never buy.
Thanks Pinkbike
But I understand what you saying, for each non carbon bike out there, there is like 25 carbon only versions, and ppl want them. Thanks for including at least one steel one there!
Same can go with wheel size, why there is no more 27,5” bikes? Well, because there is fewer of them.
Stupid me looking to buy 27,5” aluminum bike!
www.outdoorgearlab.com/expert-advice/carbon-vs-aluminum-mountain-bike-frames-the-showdown
Reality is that while Carbon bikes are the most anticipated, metal bikes are by far the most purchased bikes and its not even close.
Also ... Let the small wheel bashing begin lol
So the Giant is meant for devouring climbs, but the Salsa isn't because it has 5mm less travel, weighs a pound more, and has essentially the same geometry?
Why are trail bikes and freeride bikes part of the same test, seems a bit of a crowded mess here. Separate them into 2 articles and get twice as many clicks and a more defined comparison.
I don't remember any other field test where they combined trail and freeride bikes.
The quote clearly implies that the Salsa and Actofive are designed to devour downhills, correct?
135-140 mm travel bikes with 65° ha devouring downhills?
You make zero sense. But you are very good at making vague claims and mighty exaggerations.
Maybe those words are meant to be relevant to the class of bike I'm talking about? As in, yes, there is a 135mm-travel bike that can "devour downhills'' relevant to the other, more traditional trail bikes. Also, jesus christ, this is the intro and not a review. Does the P-Train devour downhills compared to the Ibis? YES, YES IT DOES MF'ER. But that's just my opinion and it's a vague claim and mighty exaggeration haha.