Riding Jared Graves' Prototype Yeti SB6c

Aug 19, 2014
by Mike Levy  
There are good days and then there are great days, but getting to ride Jared Graves' prototype Yeti SB6c can't be adequately described using either of those words, can it? This is the exact same bike that he rode to an amazing comeback victory at the most difficult EWS race in the series' short history just a day prior, which means that "good" and "great" don't really do this opportunity justice given that I'm more than a bit of a fanatic when it comes to getting the chance to sample bikes usually reserved for the fastest racers in the world. Never mind that the fastest racers in the world don't often let the media take their bike for a spin. In fact, Jared himself seemed a little bit reserved about the whole thing, telling me a few times that he never lets anyone go out on his race bike. FOX was having none of that, though, and I was able to do a handful of runs in the Whistler Bike Park to sample Jared's baby and see what his suspension setup was like for the EWS race so long as I promised to bring it back in one piece.





PROTOTYPE FRAME

Jared first raced the 157mm travel SB6c, the replacement for the popular SB66, at the Winter Park EWS round, and it was actually his first time on the new bike. ''I had one day of practice on it in before Winter Park, that was it,'' he said when I questioned him on how involved he was in the development on the new machine. Like a lot of race-focused companies, Yeti has strong group of trusted development riders and racers whose job it is to put time in on test mules while their top tier athletes toe start lines around the world. This method applies to Graves as well, with him making a list of needs and wants for an Enduro World Series weapon that will allow him to win races. "I just tell them what I want the bike to do, and they find ways to make that happen. As far as the geometry goes, we sat down last year and they asked me exactly what I wanted,'' he explained of the process. ''I gave them a bunch of numbers and that's exactly how it came out. The way it worked out is that the stock medium is pretty much my custom bike. Whatever I wanted for my geometry, that's what the stock medium is.'' Talk about special treatment, right? Then again, when you're arguably the world's best all around mountain bike racer, you get what you need to get the job done.

There's something else worth picking out from his words: his race bike sports the exact same geometry as what you'll find on the medium-sized production bike when they begin to roll off the line, meaning that he's not aboard some sort of radical one-off with crazy angles. How is the 27.5'' wheeled SB6c different from the 26" wheeled SB66 in the geometry department? According to Jared, it's running the exact same bottom bracket height (but obviously with more bottom bracket drop), and the head angle is a full degree slacker, putting it in the mid 65° range. It's also longer up front by half an inch, which is how most aggressive bikes seem to be going these days. ''With the SB66, I was always in between a medium and a large, and if I have to pick one I'd prefer a smaller bike with my BMX background,'' he told me when questioned on what size of bike he prefers. ''The smaller bike always feels a bit more natural to me." And, true to form, his race bike is a medium SB6c, despite the lengthened top tube of the new model.





FOX SUSPENSION

Yeti and FOX have a long history of working together and that has only strengthened over the last year with the creation of the Switch Infinity mechanism that controls the SB6c's suspension. What appears to be two diminutive shocks located just above the bike's bottom bracket are actually short rails, best described by Pinkbike's Mike Kazimer in his review of the shorter travel SB5c: ''It's actually two short rails, the heart of Yeti's 'translating pivot' suspension configuration. Initially, as the bike goes through its travel the carrier moves upwards on the rails, giving the bike a rearward axle path for improved pedalling and small bump absorption. As the rear wheel goes deeper into its travel the mechanism moves downwards, reducing the amount of chain tension for better big hit performance.'' Yeti says that the new rail layout saves about 100 grams over the older design's eccentric system.

Yeti 2015
  An early prototype of the Switch Infinity system on the far left and middle, and a production version shown on the far right. Photo: Mike Kazimer


The entire Yeti team is also supported by FOX and often has access to the latest products long before consumers ever hear about them, although that actually wasn't the case for Jared's race bike in Whistler - according to FOX, he raced with a production 36 Float 27.5 160 FIT RC2 fork on the front of his very not production SB6c, as well as a standard Float X out back. It isn't quite that clear, however, because while his fork and shock aren't utilizing any one-off parts that you can't find on your own, the valving inside of both has been tweaked slightly after much testing. Mark Jordan, FOX's Global Marketing Communications Manager, explained to me that tunes in both the 36 and the Float X are something that will be on production units in the near future, and are as simple as slight changes to the shim stacks that have come as a result of testing with riders like Graves.

Jared Graves Yeti SB6C Photo by Fraser Britton
  Coming to a Float X near you - the valving in Jared's shock is something that you'll be able to take advantage of on production models.


And what sort of setup was Jared running for the rowdy Whistler EWS race? He decided to stick with a 160mm travel fork up front, preferring to go with what he's familiar with rather than mixing it up just before the hardest race of the year and despite much of his competition going with more travel to handle the steep and rough timed sections: "I haven't had time to just go and ride to test things out, but I think we're going to change some fork settings today, and even go up to 170mm. I wanted to go with what I know for the race, and the bike was designed around a 160mm fork, so that's what I'm running right now.'' No point rolling the dice, right? It's no secret that Jared ran into some fork troubles during the race, though, and it sounds like an extremely hard g-out caused air to pass from the positive to the negative chamber, thereby lowering the fork in its travel and softening the spring rate. Both Graves and FOX were adamant that it was the first issue like this that they've seen, and it highlights the importance of testing with riders like Jared who are pushing things to the absolute limit. Unlike a lot of pros who would do their best to avoid talking about the issue, Jared was very forthcoming when Pinkbike interviewed him during the race, even explaining how he got through the first four stages and then partially solved it before coming from behind to win on the day's massive final descent from the top of the mountain.

The bike was set up surprisingly soft given how fast Jared goes and how rough the course was, but he explained that he was looking for traction on the loose ground and forgiveness over the long day more than he needed control on big hits. The 36 Float was pumped to 70 PSI, less than usual, while the Float X shock was running 170 PSI. What about changes to the fork between stages to suit the different timed sections? "Just a few, maybe three or four clicks depending on the stage. I definitely stiffened it up for stage two,'' he said about the fork. The shock is left alone during the day, though: ''I try not to touch the CTD lever on the rear shock because I have a tendency to forget to take it off of Climb mode, so I just leave it."


bigquotesI've definitely been running it a little softer here, just to try and get it to track better. The trails are rough but there wasn't too many big hits. It was just constant, with a lot of roots sticking out, stuff that you want your bike to track over. It wasn't set up for the big hits, but I wanted it to be a bit more supple. The shock only goes between 170 and 175 PSI, but I've been up as high as 85 PSI in the fork depending on the trail. - Jared Graves





COMPONENTS

As you might expect, Jared's SB6c sports a number of interesting custom bits courtesy of his mechanic, Shaun Hughes. One of the most interesting is the "ghetto tubeless" setup, something that used to be common until the advent of proper tubeless tire systems, and especially readily available rim tape and valve stems, came about. It consists of a tube that's been cut down the middle along its circumference and then used as a rim strip, complete with the valve still attached. Hughes has employed Maxxis' 24" Welter Weight tubes to fit tight around the DT Swiss EX471 rims, and then sealed the DHF and DHR II tires with WTB's TSC sealant. ''The ghetto tubeless is something that I've mastered over the years. It's just a tiny bit more secure - the tire bead fits tighter, and the small flap of tube that I leave provides a little bit more protection,'' Hughes said when questioned as to why he prefers the original method of tubeless'ing a tire over an off the shelf system. Tire pressures are nearly always at 26 PSI up front and 29 PSI out back, although those numbers might go a touch higher if there's a high risk of flatting.

Jared Graves Yeti SB6C Photo by Fraser Britton
  Don't mind me, I'm just in heaven. For the record, the back of the bike is 17.4'' long, and he runs 26 and 29 PSI.


The bike's brake setup is also out of the ordinary, although you could assemble a matching system if you were to purchase the parts separately. "Jared is extremely picky about his brakes, and so am I, so we have a good working relationship with that one,'' Hughes said of the hybrid setup that consists of Shimano's XTR Race levers with Saint four piston calipers. Anyone who has used a set of Saint brakes knows that the calipers provide an incredible amount of power, but those who pay attention to such things are also aware that the Servo Wave mechanism employed by both the Saint and XTR Trail levers gives the brakes an odd feel that requires more pressure to get the lever blades moving past a certain point. While I don't have confirmation on this, there's a good chance that Jared prefers the non-Servo Wave XTR Race top end for this exact reason. The demanding Whistler course also saw Hughes install Shimano's finned pads, saying ''I'd usually install the standard pads, but for this race I wanted a little more heat dispersion."

Other notable bits include a left XTR shifter that controls the internally routed Thomson Covert dropper post, a setup that Hughes was particularly proud of due to the lever cable anchor mods he had to come up with to get it to function. Jared was also running a prototype Renthal chainring that is the UK company's answer to the narrow ride rings already on the market, and an e*thirteen chain guide with an upper slider and taco guard but no lower roller.








I've had a few chances over the years to spend time on bikes ridden and raced by some of the quickest top pros, and every single time I've come away from the experience thinking that I'm just not good enough to get the most from their machines. Now, it goes without saying that I obviously don't have the skills, fitness or coconuts to ride the bikes like their owners do, but that's not what I'm referring to. What I mean is that the equipment under the world's best gravity racers is often set up in such an extreme way that a regular, expert-level hack like myself is actually hindered by it - the suspension is too stiff and the bike can't hold a line because of it; the brakes, although appearing to be off the shelf units, feel so powerful that they are a touch overwhelming; the tires are pumped hard enough that they can't provide sufficient bite for my more average cornering speeds. I expected much of the same with Jared's race machine, but that wasn't the case.


SUSPENSION

The Whistler EWS course was burly. Burly enough, in fact, that more than a few top tier racers made some critical comments about not just how long the day was, but also how steep and technical the descents were. And having ridden a good portion of the course at a more leisurely pace, I have no trouble admitting that I'd be more nervous than a grown man going in for a circumcision had I been lining up on race day. The mega steep, mega rough sections had me assuming that Graves would be running his suspension quite stiff to both keep the bike higher up in its travel on the near vertical pitches and to deal with smashing into Whistler's roots and rocks at mach chicken speeds, but the bike turned out to be sprung even softer than my personal 160mm travel machine. Jared and I weigh within a few pounds of each other, but I have to confess that I found the bike almost too soft for my liking, at least at first - remember that I was there to ride his exact race setup, not to change anything to suit me better - but realized after going back to come through the same rough section a few times that, while it felt quite soft, it also felt very, very controlled. Despite Jared telling me that he prefers more open damper settings, the FOX 36 didn't want to dive into its travel like I would have expected, instead staying up relatively high given the 70 PSI in its air chamber.

Jared Graves Yeti SB6C Photo by Fraser Britton
  Jared's forgiving suspension setup stamped out much of the spikes that would otherwise have been fed through into his handlebar by a stiffer fork and shock, and his SB6c tracked the ground like a downhill bike because of it.


After looking back over my FOX notes from testing back home I realized that 70 PSI is what I ended up settling on with the 36 Float 27.5 160 FIT RC2 fork in our test stable, meaning that Jared's air pressure for the Whistler EWS race is similar to what I run on my local trails. Does that mean that I'm maybe running my fork too stiff? Maybe not, as he did tell me that he has gone with a more forgiving suspension setup for the day's brutal timed stages: "I've definitely been running it a little softer here, just to try and get it to track better,'' he explained when I sheepishly told him that his pride and joy felt a bit under-sprung at first. Isn't that a bit like telling Sebastian Loeb that his car setup is a little off? ''The trails are rough but there wasn't too many big hits. It was just constant, with a lot of roots sticking out, stuff that you want your bike to track over. It wasn't set up for the big hits, but I wanted it to be a bit more supple,'' he clarified, no doubt much nicer than Monsieur Loeb would have been about it. Not surprisingly, Jared was 100% correct about this, and the fork simply erased the roots and rocks under its tires. The same goes for the Float X shock on the back of the SB6c: it felt quite soft yet controlled, and there were no spikes or surprises coming from under me. The other thing to keep in mind here is that Jared was on his bike all damn day, and racing down trails that hikers would have hard time getting up without a few tumbles, so the bike needed to be run more forgiving so as not to make his arms, legs and back do all the work. I don't know about you, but I feel tired just thinking about climbing nearly 8,000 feet and descending close to 11,000 feet, and he had to keep those numbers in mind when setting up his machine.

What does the suspension on Jared's SB6c feel like in one sentence? Forgiving and supple enough for the average rider to enjoy without getting beat up, but more controlled than I expected given the surprising spring rate.

Jared Graves Yeti SB6C Photo by Fraser Britton
  With the handling and speed of a go-kart running on nitrous, Jared's compact SB6c is a blast on the trail.


HANDLING

The bike's suspension wasn't the only surprise, though, because it also handled quicker than I would have thought. Again, with such a rowdy course I had assumed that his bike would have been slackened out to create a mid-travel chopper, but again I was wrong. How does that saying go again? Don't assume anything because it makes an ass out of you and me, I think. Jared's compact feeling SB6c felt like a humming bird buzzing in and out of the trees, turning into corners with next to no effort and popping out of them just as fast. The 740mm wide handlebar certainly speeds up the bike's handling a touch, but while its steering felt unicycle-fast, I also wouldn't say that it came across as nervous in the slightest. Pinpoint accurate, maybe, but not nervous. Given his BMX racing background, the preciseness of his SB6c makes a lot of sense, although it doesn't provide the relaxed ride of many off the shelf 160mm travel bikes. It was also obvious to see what he meant when he was talking about allowing the bike to track the ground, as it felt like I had enough traction to do anything thing I wanted. The tire pressure was a touch higher than I would have preferred - 26 PSI up front, 29 PSI out back - but the supple suspension meant zero second guessing when it came time to lean the bike over in the loose Whistler dirt.

As far as handling goes, the package went a bit like this: quick steering that rewards accuracy, and with traction that felt like his Maxxis tires were made from the same rubber that they make erasers with.



What does it all mean?

Jared's SB6c wasn't what I was expecting in more ways than one. Not only was his suspension setup more forgiving than I assumed it would be, but it was also incredibly controlled and supple. My initial pushes on the fork and shock had me assuming that I was going to be pitching back and forth through the stroke with every pull of the brake levers or push of the pedals, but the amount of control on tap from the fork and shock's dampers was next level. And the bike was far from being the slack angled machine that I expected to be aboard, instead offering up razor sharp steering that felt like it was hard wired directly into my frontal lobe. In all honesty, as a solid rider but certainly not a pro by any stretch of the imagination, I'd probably be quicker on a slacker bike, but, as Jared proved, his SB6c is a formidable weapon in the hands of someone who can take advantage of it.

www.ridefox.com

Author Info:
mikelevy avatar

Member since Oct 18, 2005
2,032 articles

126 Comments
  • 250 3
 ''I try not to touch the CTD lever on the rear shock because I have a tendency to forget to take it off of Climb mode." It's nice to know that however unfit, cowardly and slow I am, I still have one thing in common with Jared Graves.
  • 12 2
 I thought the same thing. I leave it in climb mode way more often than I should considering how often I'm out riding.
  • 38 0
 Just always leave it fully open. Problem solved.
  • 5 0
 same here. i appreciate Jared's candor in talking about the technical things that commoners have, for lack of a better phrase, in common (austin powers moment there...) as well as the fork failing on him. i think it was honest nor did he say anything negative about his sponsor during the race.
  • 7 0
 On my SB66c, I've found that the rear suspension handles pedaling loads so well that there is very little difference climbing in C, T, or D. And I'll second the forgetting part!
  • 19 2
 "I like to change my CTD position between every pedal stroke" - what Rocky Mountain, Cannondale and Scott think that every rider does. they like spec'ing dual remotes. #setitandforgetit
  • 2 15
flag DeclanJeffery (Aug 19, 2014 at 19:32) (Below Threshold)
 Buy a lapierre with ei shock. SOLVED
  • 6 1
 Wow, 26psi? Only in my dreams(225lbs).
  • 6 1
 I always leave my pro-pedal set ON, but my cats love playing with little levers and they set it OFF everytime.
  • 1 1
 Never ei. So much nope.
  • 1 1
 I would be happy riding his bike in whatever condition it was in. Even if the fork felt odd to him it would probably still feel better than my only-just-serviced fox 32 haha.
  • 1 0
 Declan Jeffry Or just get a bike with a well thought out suspension design and good component spec. The electronic suspension control is bad, it tries to firm the fork up when you might be climbing up a rough rocky part of trail, that makes it harder to climb, not easier because the wheels will bounce around and loose traction on every obstacle. Bible of Bike by BikeMag reviewed this and they said that even though it has a good stiff frame the components, fork and electronic suspension design let it down. They said that the electronic suspension was only good in manual mode, where you choose if the suspension is locked out or not. but you can get mechanical or hydraulic levers to do that for half the headache and cost.
www.bing.com/search?q=bible+of+bike+lapierre&src=IE-TopResult&FORM=IE10TR
the Bible of Bike review.
  • 51 0
 Levy, you are such a nerd! (Oh, and great review, the nerd in me loves reading this stuff.)
  • 18 0
 I'd say anyone reading this full article and staring longingly at that sweet machine is a nerd for sure! Nice job Levy!
  • 13 0
 Levy's whistler write up's have been superb. maybe it's being there that's getting them all stoked.
  • 30 1
 Thanks for the props, guys. It was interesting to ride this bike.
  • 10 0
 Mike, one interesting point which I feel must be mentioned is that whilst yourself and Graves are of a similar weight, Graves' muscle mass is absurd (see the pics of him at Aussie XC nationals), and his inherent power from a lifetime of racing XC, BMX, and 4X at a national and global level will surely mean he blows through the available travel far easier than the 'average hack' does?

When Graves manhandles a bike, the bike gets worked... How did you find the suspension to react to sprinting? The amount of damping wizardry in such a soft set-up must be impressive to cope with that.
  • 2 3
 @mikelevy: but how does the bike actually feels? Basically your feedback seems much more focused on the settings than on the bike itself. We see you on a pic with a tape to measure the CS length. Any numbers to give? Or are you embargoed?
  • 4 0
 dude, it's in the caption directly below the picture: "Don't mind me, I'm just in heaven. For the record, the back of the bike is 17.4'' long, and he runs 26 and 29 PSI."
  • 20 0
 They just need to release it and stop calling it a prototype already. When you win two rounds like he did on it, it's already (Race Proven)!
  • 5 0
 or maybe he is the one that's race proven. regardless, looks like a killer ride
  • 12 0
 Great write up! A half inch longer already of a pretty long bike, wow. The old sb66 was ahead of the game in front centre compared to a lot of manufactureres. I'll be running a 4omm stem next time:-)

FYI on the head angle, the old sb66 with a 160 fork is 65.9 HA (presumably with the older taller fox 36. Nevertheless with this one being slacker and longer...,that's definitely pretty aggressive. I think most trail riders should opt for the sb5?
  • 1 0
 You know you'll be getting the SB6c for total 2014 Toonie domination. Smile
  • 2 0
 Well, I did make the decision...zero upgrades for the current ride, the SB6 won't be cheap! :-)

First world problems when one will have a kickass sb66 as a winter bike, it's almost wrong!Wink
  • 11 0
 The fact that he rode most of the race with fu.... Up forks just prove two things. He is he'll of a rider and secondly we spend way to much time and money playing around with fancy forks with loads of technical options instead of improveing our skills and condition.
  • 9 0
 He must be really good if he rides Without pedals !
  • 5 0
 All the custom tuning and geometry tweaks for Graves make me wonder at what point a bike could become to "racey" (for lack of a better term) for an average Joe like me. If Graves and I rode the same bike through the Whistler EWC course, he'd be fast as hell and I'd probably die, at least twice, and the exact bike we rode wouldn't matter, the results would always be the same. Does any of the tuning for a pro like Graves actually have a negative effect on a less talented rider who won't be pushing as hard compared to the old status quot?

Either way, Yeti, paint that frame turquoise and call me for my credit card number and shipping address.
  • 6 0
 Levy, you and Graves are within a few lbs of each other - but how much is that? I'm guessing 173 lbs. Fork and shock settings as well as tire pressures could use the context.
  • 3 0
 And how tall are you two (graves/tester)?...of course reach comes into play too.
  • 4 0
 If air moved from the negative to the positive chamber, than it wouldn't cause the fork to sit lower in its travel and lower the spring rate, it would do the opposite (well, obviously it wouldn't cause the fork to sit higher in the travel, but you get my point). When there is more air in the positive chamber than the negative, the top of the stroke is a lot stiffer, and there is a huge top out. So what really happened?
  • 5 2
 My bad, you're 100% correct. Was a bit sleepy when I wrote that and I must have missed it this morning. FOX suspects that air moved from the negative to the positive, obviously not the other way around as I had written it (now corrected). Thanks for the catch.
  • 3 3
 This happened to my fork the last two weekends -_- Fork was lowered into 'super stiff' mode with 50mm stanchion showing. 2014 Fox 34 Kashima. Garbage.
  • 5 0
 Bit strange where Fox have gone with the new Float air spring. If they had done their benchmarking research they would have realised that an o-ring for a main piston seal in a fork air spring most definitely does NOT work - hence why the original Boxxer WCs had o-rings that were later swapped out for quad rings (they kept getting stuck down), and why BOS Idylles keep getting stuck down (they still use o-rings...). And that's on top of converting the Float from a 1-moving-seal configuration to a 3-moving-seal configuration just 1 year after releasing Talas 5, which converted the old 3-moving-seal TALAS configuration to a 1-moving-seal setup much more like an older Float.
  • 2 0
 Rock Shox 2-step forks had a troublesome o-ring as well. Interesting comments, thanks for sharing. You guys are doing really interesting stuff at Vorsprung, glad to see it.
  • 1 0
 Levy, Given that no changes were made to the pros bikes before you rode them, how did the fork perform and was it on par with Lau's and the others?
  • 1 0
 Vorsprung, does the Pike have a quad ring? I rode the Pike for a month and I found it wouldn't pump up consistently (showing only 140mm stancion), unless I pulled down on the lowers, which would then cause a hiss, presumably forcing air out of the neg and back into the positive? The air spring rate seemed to increase occasionally as well. It just seemed a bit inconsistent compared to the mechanical neg springs of some forks.
  • 1 0
 The link to the interview about what happened with is fork = not working.
  • 2 0
 @ukr77, the Pike does use a quad ring in the Solo Air variant but not in the DPA. The DPA system can kind of get away an o-ring because if it does burp from the positive to the negative chambers, the travel adjust system makes it possible to equalise anyway. If you have a Solo Air spring and it's burping, you could have a damaged or contaminated seal (likely - can be damaged by installation or by imperfections in the dimple in the stanchion), an out of spec air piston (less likely but possible) or an out of spec stanchion/CSU (very unlikely). If you have a DPA fork, it can be caused by the check valve o-ring just below the topcap not seating properly.

For what it's worth, mechanical negative springs can work well if you match a certain weight/air pressure that it's optimised for. Outside a relatively narrow weight range however, air negative springs are IMO superior.
  • 3 0
 Good read, more articles like this one please. I too run my Fox fork at 70lbs. Jared Graves is really starting to transcend the sport beyond racing. By letting a journalist test ride his actual bike, he is putting himself into the realm of legends like Tomac, Cunningham, Garcia and Hans Rey.
  • 8 4
 this is why I like the pike because you can run it so it will track the ground relly well and be mega supple but it will still be sportive in the mid stroke
  • 2 1
 I'd been thinking about putting an Avalanche cartridge in my Lyrik, but they essentially say that the Charger is a copy of their setup. valving that isn't just dependent on speed, but also where in the travel you are. www.avalanchedownhillracing.com/Rock%20Shox/Pike%20Open%20Bath%20Cartridge%20Kit.htm scroll down to the Charger upgrade kit & FAQs.
  • 1 0
 dude go for it
  • 2 0
 Nah, what I'm saying is I'll buy a Pike, especially since RS refuses to make a Lyrik that fits 650b. Might buy one of those upgrade kits for it, though.
  • 1 0
 why don't you get a pike raised to 170mm if you like the lyrik
  • 1 0
 I probably won't need 170mm on my next bike, since I'm going to 650b. I've ridden 140mm front & rear 650b bikes that felt as capable as my current beast.
  • 1 2
 YER I DONT THINK TRAVEL IS THE ANSER GEOMETRY IS WHAT BIKE WAS IT AS I WAS THINK ABOUT THE 140MM MARKET
  • 3 0
 Great! I thought I had hit Nirvana with my SB66C. Now Yeti is like the hot girl at the end of the bar with the big titties. . Damn , I did not want to have bike lust in 2015.
  • 2 0
 Great article Mike, really enjoyed an honest insight in to a Pro bike.

The only thing that bamboozles me is that a 65 degree head angled bike can be described as having razor sharp handling and 740mm bars be hinted as being too narrow (if it were a production bike available to consumer I think the bar width would be slated!)... how bike design and ride expectations have changed in such a short time!
  • 1 0
 Anyone have a 2015 Fox 36 and know what lag level 70 Psi might translate to for ~82kg / 180lbs riders like Graves and Mike Levy? Knowing the approximate sag would be more useful for riders on other forks than knowing what Psi he uses. Ditto for the rear shock.
  • 2 0
 it is a little bit wired to read about his setup for this whistler event because he was riding the first 4 stages with a blown up fork, charged with a co2 and then super stiff.
  • 1 0
 ye cause he lost nearly all pressure in them for one of the stages
  • 2 1
 yeti's carbon work is super amazing. I'd have a yeti. yetis have always been beautiful. I hope they make a super sexy carbon DH bike with 26" wheels by the time I will have enough money to afford one (i hope 26" wheels come back in vogue by then)
  • 1 0
 I love 26" wheels, but I feel pretty confident that will never happen, 26" wheels will probably only be on kids mountain bikes and DJ bikes.
  • 1 0
 "This method applies to Graves as well, with him making a list of needs and wants for an Enduro World Series weapon that will allow him to win races".

"I need, neigh WANT the most expensive parts money can buy!"~ Jared Graves
  • 1 0
 Mike, any word on whether the cable anchor Jared ' s mechanic uses for the Covert Dropper is something off the shelf that can be bought, or a custom made/machined part? Trying to do something similar with my Covert but no luck so far.

Article was a great read thanks.
  • 5 0
 5mm Cable Knarp. Thats my secret. By it from any good moped parts supplier...
  • 1 0
 Also would have liked to hear a bit more about how the system on the SB6c worked eg pedals, accelerates, climbs, pretty detailed, review I do enjoy reading and hearing about the pros, and interesting though not surprising that Fox are going to alter the shim stacks for production to match what Jared runs, theybare too ultra conservative ehen tunning for production, bike looks good and always been a big Jared fan, hes a smart rider and racer.
  • 1 0
 any comments on how it pedaled? how did SI react to the softer setup? 17.4" sounds kinda longish for the chain stays though it sounds like it's still quite agile. trouble lifting the front wheel up at all?
  • 2 0
 It felt it like pedalled well but, to be honest, I only rode it in the Whistler Bike Park so as to maximize our descending time on the bike, so I can't comment with much authority on that front. Check out Mike Kazimer's review of the 127mm travel SB5c to get an idea: www.pinkbike.com/news/yeti-sb5c-exclusive-review-2014.html

The bike was crazy agile, and it manual'd very easily.
  • 2 0
 Short rear centre is a myth. 17.4" is fine.
  • 1 0
 Did Graves use volume reducer(s) in his 36?
  • 1 1
 I don't think Yeti can make up its mind on what to do. They seem to have more iterations of suspension design than most other companies. I have an aluminum sb66 from 2012 which rode well, although a bit heavy. They suddenly just quit making the bike two years later! Switched to a carbon a Tallboy LT, which blows it away in almost all aspects. You don't see Santa Cruz doing this, they stick with what they believe works. This thing looks so complicated and high maintainance, I don't expect it to last. The suspension shocks will get ground down by dirt on long dirty/wet rides, common with enduro riding. But no worry, by then Yeti will have another design. Are we there Yet(!).
  • 4 2
 Seems a lot of people are hating on the Float X lately, but I doubt most of them have ridden it. I would run one on my next bike if a good deal comes up.
  • 1 0
 Very good article. This is very compelling design despite the fact that I haven't been happy with Fox or Fox customer service in recent years. I would love to give this bike a try
  • 3 2
 Would like to see someone put the same effort/money into making a internal gearing system. Rear derailleur is such a weak link and old tech. Instead of fixing it companies are adding power and so on. Little odd.
  • 3 0
 Nice article, lot's of good tid-bits like the tubeless setup.
  • 2 0
 What kind of guide does he run? Is that a custom job or a readily available product?
  • 1 0
 It seems to be just an E Thirteen taco chainguide minus the bottom jockey roller
  • 2 0
 Carbon e13 LG1 Guide. Taco has been trimmed front and rear to do away with any unnecessary material. We just needed a top guide with protection for the chainring, but no lower guide.
  • 1 0
 When are they going to release one e13 so don't have to take to the Hacksaw JimDuggan, USA USA USA!
  • 2 0
 Mike, hows the new MTB specific 6D fullface helmet? Will we be seeing a review on that soon?
  • 2 0
 Review soon.
  • 4 0
 When can we buy this ?
  • 3 0
 Remember how frustrated you were as a little boy waiting to fall asleep on Christmas Eve? Have some sympathy Yeti! Make the morning come sooner, who cares about eating the cookies on the table with the glass of milk, f*ck the stocking, who needs it?! Just bring the damn bike!!
  • 3 0
 Cool nice to know you don't need a mega stiff setup to go fast
  • 1 2
 "My initial pushes on the fork and shock had me assuming that I was going to be pitching back and forth through the stroke with every pull of the brake levers or push of the pedals, but the amount of control on tap from the fork and shock's dampers was next level."

If the suspension works right compression and sag shouldn't be needed to fight pedal bob. Would the Yeti platform fall into one of these designs or is it still needed the shock to keep the bob away?
  • 1 1
 Although Jared Graves rode like 2 stages at the Whistler EWS with like no air n his forks, does not sound ideal when your riding local trails let alone racing at the top level of the sport.
  • 1 1
 The pressure he runs seems very low?!

I weigh about 70kg and 110PSI in my Revelations feels soft and plush, Do the new Fox forks run lower pressures as standard? or is Graves a lightweight?
  • 2 0
 The piston diameter in the 36 (36mm stanchions) is larger than in your Rev (32mm stanchions). A larger piston diameter means that you can lower the pressure to get the same support.
  • 1 0
 What chain guide is he using? I didn't think there was an E13 guide with just the top guide and a bash guard? Is it just an LG1 with the bottom roller cut off?
  • 1 0
 Perhaps "Enduro Gremlins" let the O2 out of the fork and conveniently blamed the manufacture.
  • 1 0
 Sick rig! It looks so hot I wanna take it home and introduce it to my parents
  • 3 1
 Jared Graves > Jared Fogle (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Fogle)
  • 3 0
 Good call.
  • 5 0
 Evan: McLovin? What kind of a stupid name is that, Fogell? What, are you trying to be an Irish R&B singer?
Fogell: Naw, they let you pick any name you want when you get down there.
Seth: And you landed on McLovin...
Fogell: Yeah. It was between that or Muhammed.
Seth: Why the FUK would it be between THAT or Muhammed? Why don't you just pick a common name like a normal person?
Fogell: Muhammed is the most commonly used name on Earth. Read a fuking book for once.
  • 1 0
 Did you happen to catch what size shock it used? Is it an 8.5x2.5 like the SB-66 or is it slightly different?
  • 1 0
 I hope it is so I can transfer my CCDB CS from my sb66 (fingers crossed for the seat post diameter remaining 30.9 as wellWink
  • 1 0
 Yup, that's the exact same reason I'm asking as well. I'm looking to upgrade the shock on my SB-66, but if they are different sizes, I may just wait and see about upgrading the whole frame.
  • 1 0
 Same shock as the SB66c. 8.5 x 2.5. The only change i made was to go a size down on the volume spacer in the air can of the shock. Oh, and the rear hardware is wider.
  • 1 0
 @mikelevy: Enjoyed the article. How much do you weigh, and did the 170mm cranks feel noticeably shorter?
  • 2 0
 I switched to 170 cranks recently and love them! Less pedal strikes and feel I can spin better on the climbs.
  • 2 0
 Renthal narrow wide. I want.
  • 1 0
 great article! thanks! that leaves me with just one question:
how the hell did you manage to get that ride, man???
  • 3 1
 Take note everyone!, he's using flats. No clipless for EWS champ.
  • 2 0
 Not sure if you're kidding but Jared definitely uses clipless.
  • 1 0
 Yeah just Mikes pedals to go with his 5:10s aye
  • 1 1
 Cant believe he is running the Fox Air shock up front.. pretty much a glorified RP23 .. Imagine he'd be even better on a decent suspension setup - eh hm .. cough, coil.
  • 1 0
 i wonder when sb6c coming out hopefully soon
  • 1 0
 Two year warranty on the rails, not a lot of time.
  • 1 0
 I thought it was 5 years?
  • 1 1
 Its 5 years.
  • 1 0
 Just got the new issue of BIke and it says 2 yrs and thats straight from Yeti. I heard in an early interview with the same guy as well but cant find the clip anymore.
  • 1 0
 Our original intent was to launch this Switch Infinity technology several years down the road, but after testing the design for nearly three years, we saw it was a marked improvement and decided to release it now. As for the question of whether it’s durable, hell yeah. The system was developed in conjunction with Fox Racing Shox, so the parts are bombproof. The seals are from the off-road division and the bearings are from current Fox forks. Also, the parts went through the Fox testing protocol, including a dirt-slurry immersion that lasted over a million cycles. Still not enough? We will warranty the part for two years.
—Chris Conroy, President, Yeti Cycles

www.bikemag.com/gear/exclusive-yeti-launches-new-switch-infinity-suspension-platform
  • 1 0
 That's a little odd.

Maybe the frame is 5 years and the parts are only 2?
  • 1 0
 They are stanchions not rails. I really doubt you would wear one out in two years. But it is a replaceable part and I bet it won't be more than $100 for a frame rebuild kit with bearings.
  • 1 0
 OOPs "Stanchions". Thats what the original post was about.
  • 1 0
 In theory the rebuild kit should be less as the super expensive big eccentric bearings are no longer used. A few seals, and standard 3 pair of Enduro dual row bearings, definitely a win on that one. Grease ports to purge the rails. Honestly if one purged the rails with grease occasionally it should (in theory)last a long time, didn't the proto go unserviced for like three years?
  • 1 1
 The problem is, that you have to care (clean, lube) for another 2 stanchions in a total 5 now. The open system is also
susceptible to stones, mud, water etc, even though there is some protection from the frame...
  • 5 0
 i feel i have to clear this up. There is little to no maintenance needed on the switch infinity system. I have worked on this system from the day it was conceived, and not once have i ever had a problem with stone chips, stanchion wear, seal failure, bearing failure, just to name a few. The lubing procedure is simple. Grease gun into grease ports. The system has been put through every possible durability test to try and get it to fail. If you read some of the previous threads about this, you'd see there was a slurry test also. Basically the system was cycled a million times (not exaggerating that, was a million cycles up and down) in a bath of mud, and rock. After, it was cleaned off and checked. No issues. I'd say that unit tested could have been put on any of the switch infinity bikes and noone would notice. With all of the team bikes, i have sprayed them with Pedros green fizz bike wash, and hosed them down. No removal necessary. After greasing them, i'm only purging out already clean grease. Which means no dirt or water has entered the system. So please don't assume that the Switch infinity is going to be a problem, i understand that it isn't for everyone, but assuming that it will have problems when it has been thoroughly tested for them, is wrong. And yes i DO work for Yeti Cycles as the Factory Team Mechanic, but i also work as a shop mechanic in my time away from the team, so i see all makes and models of bikes come through. I am not given any bikes through any of my jobs, but i would still buy a Yeti many times over most other brands on the market. Hope that helps!
  • 1 0
 I just got done riding a weekend in mud and rocks at our local resort and the Switch Infinity was the cleanest part of the bike. Super easy to clean too. The SB5c can handle more than any other 5 inch bike I have ridden. Felt more like the SB66c. You should all demo one before you make up your mind!
  • 2 0
 Why only a two year warranty then?
  • 1 0
 warranty isn't my department, but if nothing happens to them in the 2 year period, i'd be surprised if it'd be anything to stress about after that time.
  • 1 0
 Shaun,

Thanks for taking the time to answer questions and all the great feedback. I think it's really cool that you guys at Yeti make yourselves available to the media and consumers like this. I'm already a big fan of your products (the SB-66 was one of the best bikes I've ever owned). It's great to see a company going the extra mile like this.

Much appreciated!
  • 1 0
 Looks proper all muddied up like that
  • 2 0
 Great article Mike
  • 1 0
 Why doesn't he have the newest xtr on his bike?
  • 2 2
 Because its shit haha
  • 9 0
 the latest model XTR isn't readily available yet, so we don't want to run it with no spares available. Considering i change the chain, cassette and chainrings from his race bike, onto his training bike, and then replace with new parts on his race bike every major race, it isn't the right time to be running the latest gear. And the reason it gets changed so frequently is to make sure there are no failure's from fatigue. These guys hit their major components on more stuff than you can imagine, so a couple of weeks worth of riding to them i like a year on some others bikes.
  • 3 0
 Great job for the deep explanation Shaun, big props to you. Maybe next time Mike Levy should do an in depth interview with mechanic like you.
  • 1 0
 Excellent answer Shaun. Makes sooo much sense but I never would have guessed it. Thanks to you and Graves for being on the boards here!
  • 1 0
 Mike what is your personal 160mm bike?
  • 1 0
 im going to guess it's different when he's on the clock vs not.
  • 1 0
 Why not go ride you bikes you dicks.
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.069707
Mobile Version of Website