whip off the drop... damn
You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login
whip off the drop... damn
141 Comments
  • 19 8
 nice pic dude, loooks unreal xD
  • 39 9
 POD!! suck a clear picture! that bike look proper old school! Wink
  • 7 6
 this is an amazing pic, Groves is the man :-) POD!!!
  • 5 5
 Agreed, Great quality! I say POD!
  • 5 5
 diggin the tires and rims
  • 3 7
flag specializedrider07 (Apr 29, 2009 at 18:12) (Below Threshold)
 Pod !!! Sick photo
  • 23 5
 this is why i should invest in photoshop instead of trying to use paintshop pro haha
  • 5 6
 this is a good sequence!!! Smile
  • 6 6
 Sick, takes guts to even do that thing, nevermind whipping off it! huge props to the rider!
  • 9 21
flag woody-dh (Apr 30, 2009 at 0:01) (Below Threshold)
 CASEY ! Nice sequence by the way
  • 5 6
 great sequence!
really cool line to do that trick on Big Grin
  • 6 7
 Sweet trick and sequenceSmile Casey rules!! Big Grin
  • 3 4
 casey groves is such a sick rider
  • 3 4
 brycerink, i can edit sequences fine usind Paintshop pro, i actually find it difficult to use others such as adobe
  • 1 5
flag addyi (Apr 30, 2009 at 1:39) (Below Threshold)
 c00l
  • 1 4
 damm. now thats nice.
  • 3 5
 where did the landing jump come from?
  • 5 22
flag pev182 (Apr 30, 2009 at 3:32) (Below Threshold)
 photoshop is crap,
what are them tyres?
  • 8 6
 id really like to see the origional photos on their own so i can try to figure out whats gone wrong here in the photoshop, it confuses and annoyes me! Razz
  • 1 6
flag beavola (Apr 30, 2009 at 7:03) (Below Threshold)
 tires look like Geax - whitewall Saguaros maybe?
  • 5 3
 umm, personaly i dont like it because its confusing the fuck outta me, i need to see the originals. the right handside of the landing kills it for me. in my opinion, itll do for POD.
  • 1 3
 C-Groves T-whip G-star!!
  • 2 3
 yeah, obv you gotta shop it to get the sequence in one shot
  • 0 2
 rims look fcuking cool
  • 1 4
 StevePrice, the landing is like that cause the shot needed to be photoshopped in order to fit the sequence in properly. The camera was probs moving when the shots were taken, so that's probs why the landings like that, just an fyi...nice pic though.
  • 0 0
 yeah no thanks for the defense.. but i guess it was just a strange phenomenon the originals all have that gap next to the lander?
  • 1 0
 i was referring to the blurriness on the far side of the landing...or is that just how the trees are agianst it? i guess you would know better than i would, seeing how its your pic.
  • 1 2
 haha i got -15 props, hell on
  • 2 0
 -16 now. Wink
  • 0 0
 lmao
  • 4 3
 just so everyone who thinks they are critics knows... i edit them as fast as possible to get them up on pinkbike.. i actually went back and fixed all of them but pinkbike wont let me update with the newer revisions..... glad to get pod just disapointed that its not best work.
  • 1 0
 Ahhh, i see!! Its the blur tool he used that makes the thing look like a composite image, where the bush to the right of the lander is blurred but the landing isn't, make sit look like the earth is in mid air, but its just covered by the bush in front.
I take it back, its not as much compositing as i thought. Still, less blur tool next time bro.

And why the hell didn;t you just post that video ^^^ as proof before?
  • 0 0
 woops so do i.....=(
  • 10 6
 Whys the background been photoshopped in?
  • 3 5
 It hasn't, thats how the sky was all weekend out there
  • 6 2
 Im not on about the sky, look at the right side of the lander and where the lander is placed. And where the drop is attatched to the floor. It's a sick sequence but i'd rather it be POD with the original background.
  • 2 1
 I've been wondering why the landing looked like that...
  • 3 1
 I think the creator has blurred everything out, to enhance the picture that this is aimed at promoting, that being the magnificent Tailwhip of the jump, the landing does look rather strange though, who knows.
  • 1 1
 yeah, I agree. I think the blurry background does wonders for subject of the picture
  • 4 3
 Really bad photoshopping. Look at the crowd in the background, they're not looking in the direction of the rider, the edge of the lander isn't even blended in, it's just hanging there. Poor effort, defo NOT POD.
  • 0 0
 www.pinkbike.com/photo/3351957 check out the original.. just some weird thing that happened
  • 2 2
 eli902902 i'm glad someone else mentioned this.

Brycerink - So thats just some good old gravity defying earth hanging in mid-air to the right of the landing - above a dirt jump(?), and a kicker taking off on the left into the underside of the drop structure.

I think you need to take your 12-year old-esque photoshop skills elsewhere. You can see the Jpeg artifacts and the sharpening effect around the trees where you've masked the rider.

Everyone who bought this should be ashamed of themselves. Post the original pic/s if you want to scrape back any respect.
  • 0 1
 its funny that you say that... i didnt touch that part of the picture other than putting a blur on it.. seriously just let it be
  • 0 2
 www.pinkbike.com/photo/3351957
I dont know why you guys all care so much.. sorry that i did a quick photoshop job... ill make sure never to do that again hah.. i can only assume that you are all jealous that you have never gotten pod.. yeah its not perfect but it got pod for a reason
  • 0 0
 gravity defying earth? try a bush casting a shadow? and the originals are posted...
  • 0 0
 See my retraction below.
  • 6 2
 sick whip and nice tires
  • 10 6
 nah. not worthy.
  • 1 5
flag lewispie (Apr 30, 2009 at 3:27) (Below Threshold)
 Nup, agreed!^
  • 5 2
 Someone's went mad with the blur tool
  • 0 1
 Put blur on it, eheheheheh
  • 6 3
 it's a sick ride, but the photo isn't that good...
  • 1 4
 means alot coming from a 14 year old
  • 0 2
 eheheheh
  • 1 0
 oi twat!!! 14 yer olds can have a fucking opinon too....
  • 3 2
 That's very sick...looks like his balls and rear tire had an encounter upon landing
  • 5 3
 what about the landing`s right part ?a bit photoshopped.....
  • 2 3
 cool sequence...BUT when you follow it down from the star and get to the down ramp it just destroys the photo.Just looks drastically retarded. Shouldnt be pod, even though its a sick seq.
  • 3 1
 has he got a paper areo plane in his front wheel or sumthin, haha
  • 1 0
 it might look fake in the pic but at 2:46 in this video its real
www.superhumanmag.com/content/view/1341/92
  • 0 0
 This pic looks weird to me, anyone else think that? I love it but random parts are really in focuz and others are completely out of focus... or am i just crazy?
  • 4 2
 soooo sick!
  • 3 2
 good job dude , it's going to POD Smile
  • 5 6
 Fake photoshop, good trick but I think we vote in a photo quality and the art on it, not only in the trick and this one is very amateur photoshoped. Sorry...
  • 4 2
 I very much agree!
  • 2 2
 It was obviously photoshoped. Look at the landing. its almost right behind the big jump.
  • 0 0
 not that much better but a bit...
  • 0 1
 that photo is unedited soo dont know what you are referring to. The wierd part on the lander is a bush
  • 0 1
 What are you talking about!?! the landing just dissapears into the bushes!! that is sooooo fake. ( the landing that is.!) You actually thought I was that stupid!?
  • 0 0
 hahahah wow im not sure why you think i would need to edit that side of the jump... i have over 30 pictures with the bush in that same place
  • 0 0
 Maybe not, but it looks photoshoped. Razz
  • 1 1
 ah not a good pod. In my opinion they should be un modified pictures, straight up, single shots
  • 2 0
 hardcore!!, nice angle
  • 3 2
 Sick sequence buddy!
  • 3 3
 thats so sweet dude. you rock at pictures. POD
  • 2 2
 WhyTF isn't this POD yet???
  • 0 1
 Ahhh yes it is now good!!
  • 2 1
 that's a really sick
  • 0 3
 its shite....its photoshopped
  • 1 3
 sooooooooooooooooooooooo f****** fake wtf r u guys blind on the right of the landing is all of the proof u need wow how can u miss that
  • 2 2
 haha what the heck could be fake about it? I took it i think i would know if it was fake or not... u should quit smoking crack
  • 1 2
 yeah OrangeGoblin is right the picture could be cool but it looks really fake and horribly photoshoped
  • 1 0
 saw that coming...
  • 1 0
 Thats so dope
  • 0 0
 Nice Photoshop!! Pretty cool>>>
  • 1 0
 So Sick!!!!!!
  • 3 3
 POD fo sho
  • 2 2
 pod!!
  • 2 3
 sick photo, the new transition double looks nice
  • 2 4
 brill pic man, i like the white walls on the tyres to, if that's the rims soz it looks like it's the tyres !
  • 0 1
 Sick photo! Definately POD worthy
  • 0 1
 its shite....its photoshopped
  • 1 1
 Sick drop whip !
  • 0 2
 its shite....its photoshopped
  • 0 1
 I can still see the pixels, needs more blur tool.
  • 0 1
 dude thats soooo bad like its ..meh unrealistic
  • 0 1
 It looks photo shopped...
  • 0 0
 sweet
  • 0 0
 So Clear Razz
Great pic
  • 3 4
 WTF is in his spokes?
  • 3 2
 they had numbers in there wheels so the announcers knew who they were
  • 1 1
 In his spokes? Don't you know he's really reppin Oak-town? Scraper Bikes!!
  • 4 6
 Background is photoshoped but still sick pod
  • 1 2
 i like his bike xD
  • 1 3
 Oh yea thats a POD if i ever saw one
  • 0 1
 hes killin it
  • 0 1
 CRAZY!!!
  • 1 4
 nice picture, POD for sure
  • 1 4
 what a huge gap!! Wicked sequence.
  • 1 3
 holy balls dude
  • 0 2
 shit thats good
  • 0 1
 its shite....its photoshopped
  • 0 3
 strange tires
  • 0 3
 pod pod pod pod
  • 1 4
 Im diggin it!
  • 1 4
 NICE CASEY!!
  • 0 3
 nice pic
  • 3 4
 I agree, good sequence but bad photoshopping due to the focal depth.
  • 0 0
 The original comment i replied above on was saying learn how to use focal length.
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.043227
Mobile Version of Website