0% Loaded
prev
1/4
next
THE AIRCRAFT The premier downhill MTB helmet from 100% has landed. The AIRCRAFT is precision engineered with a carbon/Kevlar composite shell providing an ultra-lightweight design. Airflow is managed through 25 channels to create the most ventilated helmet available. Removable and washable comfort liner, emergency release cheek pads and aluminum hardware complete the package. Each helmet comes with a durable helmet bag with integrated goggle pocket.
The Aircraft comes in 4 colorways: Bi Turbo Blue, BI Turbo Red, R8 White, Raw Black and is available in 5 different sizes: X-Small, Small, Medium, Large, X-Large.
Features:• Ultra-light design featuring aerospace Carbon/Kevlar composite shell.
• Active cooling system maximizes airflow offering more ventilation than any other helmet.
• Washable, antibacterial comfort liner, cheek pads and chin strap covers.
• Emergency release cheek pads for quick, safe removal.
• Integrated compartment accepts inflatable emergency release systems.
• Compatible with most popular neck brace systems.
• Titanium D-Ring buckle provides a secure fit while saving weight.
• Engineered with 2 shell sizes and 3 EPS sizes to achieve the perfect fit.
• Adjustable visor with machined light-weight aluminum screws.
• Durable helmet bag with integrated goggle pocket included.
• Accessories: replaceable visor, mouth piece, comfort-liner, cheek pads, and visor screws
• MSRP: $400 USD.
www.ride100percent.com / @ride100percent
That said, this helmet *looks* great - kills it in the appearance department.
I'm so sick of this argument. Its a complete logical fallacy. Nobody is saying to not wear a helmet or risk your well being. What we are saying is the markup doesn't need to be insane.
Yes it is expensive, no doubt. But you should keep in mind that the price is based on much more than just the product itself:
- development costs (labour, prototypes, laboratory tests, ...)
- tooling costs (moulds, which are super expensive, especially considering the low sales numbers in comparison to other mass-produced goods)
- costs for assembly (labour, maybe also investment for automatic-assembly line)
- and last but not least... material (which should only be about 10% of total costs)
There's much more ridiculous stuff than a high quality, great looking $400 carbon helmet. For example a pair of $400 of Gucci jeans.
Just my 2ct.
When buying based on the marketing, I'd rather go for a something like POC who talk about safety rather than generic talk about vents and weight savings. Same kind of money, just a different focus.
About the weight, how much is 50g in real terms? I mean, can you think of an object that weights 50g? Isn't it, like, a coin, or something? A packet of crisps? Half a Mars bar? I don't know what 50g even feels like but I'm sure I couldn't tell between 1200 and 1250g on my head. How much do goggles, glasses or a Gopro weigh?
So yeah, road cyclists can get away with some extra weight here and there. But us mountainbikers ought to be the real weight weenies, the more on rougher trails
And that's probably where it gets difficult to compare. Yes two helmets may have passed the same tests and got the same certification, but this doesn't necessarily mean that they both stuck to the bare minimum level of protection to get there. This may go for helmets for road cyclists (especially the really competitive ones) but for instance open face trail helmets (like the Giro Xen and what came after that) are a nice example where manufacturers try to provide a higher level of protection at the expense of weight and ventilation. They still get the same certification though we all know that that road helmet is never going to save you as well as the trail helmet. As for full face, I'm not sure but I thought that the Troy Lee Designs D3 helmet is actually heavier than the older D2 because they made it safer. A bit heavier on the neck when riding but a bit nicer to the head when it takes a knock. Like many things it is a trade off, there is no simple "better". Think of a motorcycle helmet. Get an open face helmet and your face risk getting messed up in a crash, get a closed face helmet and you're more likely to sustain a neck injury in a similar crash. Ah, rather not think about it, right? Still, buying helmets mostly guided by how cool it is going to make you look seems a bit shallow.
Don't get me wrong it's a beautiful helmet & 100% is a great brand,love their products.But I don't need a $400 helmet if I can be happy with a $200 helmet.
The mostbang for the buck is typically the $200 market at the moment, grio cypher, bell transfer 9, etc. More does get you some sweet shit though ,magnetic cheek pads are pretty cool.
if they did that the diety TMAC would win.
ep1.pinkbike.org/p4pb569807/p4pb569807.jpg
ACU Gold standard, so a much higher safety level for large impacts (admittedly not so absorbent for lower speeds)
only GBP£200 from my local Moto-X shop, mix of 4 composites including carbon fibre and kevlar, and just over 1kg.
super comfortable too
there are typically two fit shapes in MTB helmets - "asian" and "caucasian" (also known as regular), which does not actually refer to race / genetics but 3-dimensional head "shape".
As an example, I'm a white guy of Scottish / Canadian origins, but I'm an "asian" fit in helmets, which means I fit Giro helmets best. You may know that sunglasses brands like Oakley also offer an "asian" fit to their sport glasses, but this is different to the helmet shape.
I cannot fit into a Specialized helmets in the UK because they only import the caucasian fit range, a business decision to minimize warehouse space
Outside of the UK you can get their helmets in asian fit too, I have tried these in other countries and they worked fine.
do specialized specifically offer "asian" helmets? i have never seen helmets offered in asian or regular. I know ive seen some sunglasses and goggles offered in asian or regular fit for the same make and model, but never helmets, in mtb or moto.
It's funny... Most of the time, in this industry especially, it seems like were paying more for the design or appeal vs the protection or the benefit of going with the 'better' product in general and we don't question it's functionality because it's obviously sexy. Not saying it's a bad thing, i expect a $400 helmet to appeal much more to me than a $150 helmet, bet there's not a lot of backing to the reasoning behind it.
i am excited by the removable cheek pads and such.
nothing worse than trying to yank a helmet off someone with a neck injury...
however its not an industry standard feature, so how do the EMTs know they can do that?
googled
I am excited for this helmet. The TLD stuff looks great, but I don't like how the D2s have the same shell size for multiple sizes. Put fit pads inside the liner to make it a large? Seriously? I won't get another one of those. I think the foam impact liner is too thin for what it needs to do. There are others-Giro, Bell, Fox, that have a thicker foam. I could be wrong, but I'm guessing that thicker foam would do a better job of protecting in a crash.
The Kali is ugly as sin, but it does have good safety ratings being DOT certified.
This helmet looks great, so as long as it fits well, and if it has the safety ratings, I'd buy one. I'm glad to see another company in the high-end market.
But i would like to know my lid meets the a safety standard that motorbike lids have to meet.
ultimatemotorcycling.com/2013/04/08/motorcycle-helmet-standards-explained-dot-ece-22-05-snell
Glasses from 100% awesome price / quality. However it is too much for regular rider for two year usage in awarage
what are you talking about?
www.canadasmotorcycle.ca/brands/arai-motorcycle-helmets/rx-q-helmets.html
just the first result that came up
.....and that's a matter of opinion
no shit borat. kali isn't the only brand out there making safe helmets, there are plenty of other safe options out there that look better.