Behind the Scenes - Airborne Bicycles Photoshoot

Dec 27, 2011 at 13:28
by Ian Hylands  
Views: 7,225    Faves: 12    Comments: 0


Airborne Bicycles has a different approach to their bike team. Instead of a crew of top pros representing their product, they have a crew of "Wingmen" who are chosen from everyday people that like to ride bikes, and also like to talk about it. This is a great way to market bikes that are targeted at the everyday rider with a smaller budget, and Airborne also used their Wingmen as models for our photo shoot. And while they are all great riders, they're not professional riders, or even pro bike models, which presented its own set of challenges. As a photographer the biggest challenge is always trying to work with what you have when things aren't perfect. Given a great rider on an amazing section of trail in perfect light many photographers can take a great shot. But when you need to shoot an entire bike range from hardtail to freeride and everything in between including cyclocross, in one location, things become a little more difficult. The shoot went really well considering our limited amount of time and terrain. We managed to make do with what we had, and I'm pretty stoked with how it turned out. What do you think?

Airborne Bicycles Photoshoot

Airborne Bicycles Photoshoot

Airborne Bicycles Photoshoot

Airborne Bicycles Photoshoot

Airborne Bicycles Photoshoot

Airborne Bicycles Photoshoot

Airborne Bicycles Photoshoot

Airborne Bicycles Photoshoot


Author Info:
IanHylands avatar

Member since Jun 23, 2008
588 articles

116 Comments
  • 14 0
 I think it would be really interesting too see an in depth review of thier bikes and how they stack up performance wise against the big companies, especially the dh bike. And furthermore whether or not the price you
  • 8 0
 ***price you pay is worth it for what you get.
  • 5 2
 As an Airborne Flight Crew member, I rode/raced a Taka for most of the season.

Last race was a 12 hour DH race in Telluride, Colorado, my category was open amateur (ie all non-pro cagegories in one group) and I won the riding the Taka. It was up against most major and independent brands, so that should give a general idea how it can stack up performance-wise. Also - the July issue of MBA has a review of it as well.
  • 14 0
 For the DH bike, find a review of an Iron horse Yakuza, then give or take with the spec...
  • 3 1
 lol^ hes got a point Razz
  • 4 0
 dingus is right, it's just a Yakuza with some better spec'd parts on it. DEFINITELY worth the money, I absolutely LOVE my Taka...It's really helped me to progress my riding and saved me a ton of money in the process. 2 thumbs up for the Taka in my book
  • 4 17
flag mtb455 (Dec 29, 2011 at 10:24) (Below Threshold)
 sorry but i would pass on riding the huffy
  • 2 3
 I read the review of the taka, which is here: www.airbornebicycles.com/media/3824/july_2011_mountainbikeaction_taka%20review.pdf
Oddly enough they tested it at Southridge, my local race track!

Also read the one for the wingman, here:
www.mbaction.com/Main/News/The_Airborne_Wingman_Cheap_Seat_For_Your_Next_Flig_4924.aspx

I think i would rather spend good money on a dh bike and get something better, but the wingman doesn't look so bad.
  • 2 1
 i know one of the mbaction testers he said the bike was twitchy and felt like it was made of plastic
  • 1 0
 the wingman or the taka?
  • 8 1
 You think airborne is going to bring back the sunday as well?
  • 3 0
 That would be so sick. The only issues with that might be with getting the license for DW link, but that would be just so cool if they could. It would bring serious attention to them as a brand too.
  • 5 7
 tbh they look cheeply made and not very good. the dh bike looks entry level and alot like a iron horse yakuza witch werent any good in the first place.
  • 8 1
 freeridemanic - they ARE entry-level DH bikes... What other entry level bikes can be had for $1500 US? Have you seen one up close? If not, then what criteria are you using to come with the "cheaply made and not very good" statement?
  • 2 9
flag freeridemanic (Dec 30, 2011 at 6:37) (Below Threshold)
 i guessed as much Smile i have not seen one up close but i have been looking at pictures of them and its what i think.
  • 4 4
 I have no experience with Airborne bikes at all, But IMO I would rather go buy a used bike for 1500 then ride an Airborne the quality just does not seem to be there.
  • 2 3
 I definitely agree with that.
  • 4 1
 I definitely do not agree with that.
  • 6 1
 If you have no experience at all with Airborne, how the hell can you comment on the quality of their bikes? They are using proven frame designs, if a little dated, and parts from manufacturers whose name you would instantly recognize. Buying a brand bike for $1500 gives you a warranty and peace of mind, and makes sure it will work out the box.

Furthermore, they actually cut prices on almost all of their models (the taka is now $1300, down from $1500), instead of just taking a profit increase.
  • 4 3
 Thats just how I feel, no need for anyone to agree with it. Buying a NEW DH Bike for $1300 defiantly does NOT give me piece of mind. The Bike’s spec list is all low end and outdated parts, It just looks to me like there is no attempt to create a quality product. Thats just my opinion.
  • 3 6
 i have to agree with E-walk. they may not be bad bike and may be built well its just the fact that they dont look quality (from looking at the pictures) and the price makes me think they are cheeply made. i would rather spend $1500 on a dh bike that i knew cost $3000 when it was origionaly made and looks good quality, has good components and rides better than an airborn.
  • 3 0
 Fair enough, I don't think you could really fault them on that though, the fact that the price can be that low and still be profitable is amazing to me. And judging from the reviews, they do seem to be pretty tough.
  • 3 0
 They haven't paid for any of the R&D on these frames, and all you guys moaning about not having piece of mind, bikes are too f*cking expensive as it is, do NOT bash a company for producing good, inexpensive bikes. I do not resent them for trying to corner the market there, it might even force the big players to reconsider their ever-increasing prices.
  • 3 9
flag freeridemanic (Jan 2, 2012 at 11:34) (Below Threshold)
 your point is invalid as you are clearly missing the point. they are cheep, look cheep and don't look that good quality, there spec's are mediocre at best and people have had problems with the frames from the go. im simply saying with a downhill bike you don't want it to be cheaply made. cheep crap can cause your death at the end of the day. and yes bike prices are increasing thats because the technology used and materials used are getting higher and higher quality. look at it like a car. you have a old peugeot (bike equivilent an airborn) now the peugeot brakes down alot because its cheeply made and not very good. on the other hand you have a bmw (bike equivilent a intense m9) not a single problem with it because its made to a very high standard. you see my point?
you can waste you money like i did on a cheep shit downhill bike and then realise what a utter twat you were after wasting a grand on fixing it again and again or you can buy a decent well made bike second hand for the same price and not have any problems with the frame or its linkages ect.
  • 5 0
 It is cheap because they haven't paid for any of the R&D on their frame designs, in fact to me it looks like they're selling off old stock (the forks equipped on the DH bike, what was the Iron Horse Yakuza Kumicho, are definitely not post-2007 zocchis). Inexpensive does NOT mean bad quality. Intenses are sold at higher prices because they are made in a country with high labour costs, and very R&D driven.

There are more variables here to consider than just cost-quality correlation, don't be so naive as to assume that's all there is to it.
  • 10 1
 Freeridemaniac:

Can you describe how you think they "look cheap" and "don't look that good quality" ? In what ways? You are just trying to reinforce a misconcpetion about a brand that you really don't know much about, based on what - how you feel about how they look online, and a few internet posts by some unreasonable brats?

The point is, the bike is $1500 brand-new. There is NO body, no company, that sells a dh bike for this price. Yes, it is an ENTRY LEVEL bike - it is aimed towards those that are just getting into the sport, not people who are looking for a race-ready world cup machine. I would argue that it's more bike than a majority of "downhill riders" actually need in the first place, but that's beside the point.

Is the fork adjustable as a Boxxer WC? Nope. Will it survive an 8 foot drop just as well? Yes. Are the cranks as light as a pair of Saints? Nope, but they hold up under pressure, and take the same 8 foot drop just as well. Minion tires - they work. E-13 chainguide - again it works. Issues with the bushings on the reare shock? it happens, and that issue is easily addressed - enough that it's really a non-issue. A company that stands behind its product? Absolutely.

I raced a Taka all season, on arguably the roughest course in this part of the country (Angelfire), and including a 12 hour race @ Telluride, another not very smooth course - and won that race (Solor amateur open class). Numerous trails through Colorado, New Mexico, and California on this bike (Mammoth, Northstar) and no problems. I wonder, what experience do you personally have on the bike, other than what you READ on the INTERNET forums? This bike kept me up with all the favorites; Commencial, Transition, Specialized, Intense... It is FAR from dangerous. I've trusted my life to this bike over and over again, and its never given a hint of not being capable of what I can throw at it and more.

Did you own a Taka?
  • 6 0
 Well said Jerry!
  • 2 10
flag freeridemanic (Jan 2, 2012 at 19:31) (Below Threshold)
 i never said that it was a bad bike jerry i merely said that it looked cheaply made witch it dose (the design looks cheep, finish looks cheep the components make it look cheep ect) yes a downhill bike for $1500 is cheep and i know it is only a entry level bike but even so you want a bike that's decent quality. this dose not look decent quality. it may be decent quality but im just saying it dose not. i don't care if the component will withstand a certain hight drop or match a certain other component. there cheep components. and surely a company should address any problems there is with its frames before they sell them. and saying you raced somewhere on one and won means nothing. Fort William is a world cup dh track. people still ride down it on hardtail's oh and yes i technically have road one as one of my best friends owns a iron horse yakuza kumicho. same bike... it rides nice but he constantly has had problems with the bushings and other components. it may be the cheapest dh bike out there yes, that therefore means its cheaply made. cheaply made things don't last long hence why people are complaining about them as can be seen in others comments below and above.... its my opinion not a fact so don't say im wrong... bye
  • 7 1
 No, you know what? You don't even have the right to have your opinion about the Taka. Having an opinion on something you have never experienced for yourself is a a sign of utter stupidity, because you are judging something exclusively on its appearances and what your friends friends mom's neighbor told you, instead of using it and deciding for yourself.

And cheaply made and inexpensive are 2 very different things. Something can be well made and inexpensive if it lacks the features of more expensive versions. For example, the 888 on the taka is the least expensive model they make, but that doesn't mean it can't function just as well as the rc3 ti or close to it, it just lacks adjustibility. Similarly, the X5 shifter is just made of plastic instead of metal or carbon like the X9/X0 models, but that doesn't automatically mean its not going to shift as well. You yourself have avid juicy brakes and an e13 guide on your own bike, so obviously you can vouch for them. Bottom line is, the components on this bike are all made by respected brands such as marzocchi and avid and the fact they are the base models does not mean they don't function at a high level.

As for the frame itself, I've never ridden one so I won't even pretend to know how it rides or that I can judge it, but factor out the cost of the parts and you're getting it for next to nothing, so as long its durable and decent enough to ride (which seems to be the opinion of those who actually own them) then its a good buy in my mind.
  • 3 1
 Im not going to comment anymore on the frame’s quality, people are allowed to buy which ever bike they please and if it ends up being an Airborne thats fine. But Swearmouth if you are going to say that an X5 will preform to the same extent as an XO, you are sorely mistaken. I can say from riding and working on every range of sram X series and avid juicy brake products that the difference is substantial. If you do not believe me please go try for yourself.
  • 2 0
 Those are post-2007 888rv forks. They are still available OE, just not aftermarket. A product manager could still spec a brand new bike today with one and Marz would supply it.
  • 2 0
 Thanks Tifo, I was wondering how that happened.
  • 1 8
flag freeridemanic (Jan 3, 2012 at 14:11) (Below Threshold)
 swearmouth i have road a iron horse yakuza kumicho and they are the exact same bike. they even have the exact same linkage problems so yes i can... haha ok so your telling me a 2007 888 rv functions as well as a 2011 888 rc3 ti? do you smoke crack? lower down models of forks will never last as long or function as well as the higher end ones. this is the reason why you have to replace a sram x7 mech after a season of use because it begins to loose its spring tension and gain strech wair. with an x0 you can run them fine for two or more seasons. and no i cant my jucies are terrable and average at best. they require bleeding every month of riding just to keep the modulation and power average. the e13 guide is good but mine is an lg1 not a old srs. and i never said that was a bad part of the bike. that and the cranks are probably the only parts on the whole bike i would be happy to own as i know from personal use that those are the only things i would not have problems with. and yes the fact that they are bace models dose mean they dont fuction at a high level if they didnt the coumpany would not need to bring out new products. they also wouldnt have different versions would they. cheep parts are cheep because they are not made to last long and hold functionality forever. this is the reason things like headphones etc can be bought so cheep.
  • 1 6
flag freeridemanic (Jan 3, 2012 at 14:11) (Below Threshold)
 also and dont make it out like i have never road a taka. they are a iron horse yakuza kumicho with worse a spec, different paint and decals. one of my best friends owns a yakuza and even he disslikes it. i have road it on multiple occasions. he hardley rides it because its always braking. he has virtualy given up on it so much so that he is fixing the linkage for about the 20th time and then selling the thing for way cheeper than he bought it. that is the reason why i can say the taka is a not very decent looking and functioning bike. oh and the linkage problem is iron horse/airborns fault because the circular gap in each side of the linkage is too big for the bolt itself. the bushing/barings are the wrong size for the bolt meaning that you can tighten it and it will tighten as hard as you can but you will still get up and down play. but no side to side play. the only way to sort this is to mill the linkage plates out, get custom barings/bushings made and use a custom made bolts. if you dont and you leave it then it starts to oval out the frame. i know that for a fact as its how my friend is having to fix his and its costing him nearly $200 to have it done.
  • 8 1
 @freeridemanic if you're going to continue your trollish rant about how you hate Airborne, Mongoose, and who knows what other brands, you should learn to spell properly and use proper grammar, or at least take the time to use a browser with spell check. The atrocious spelling and grammar really takes away from the respectability of your posts, and makes them quite tedious for the rest of us to read.

thanks!
  • 1 9
flag freeridemanic (Jan 3, 2012 at 17:10) (Below Threshold)
 sorry ian some of us cant help being born with reading and writing disability's... and its not that i hate them im mearly trying to get the point across that cheaply made dh bikes (witch the taka is) are stupid and pointless and a waste of our time and money. that's all
  • 7 0
 I'm truly sorry if that's the case, and it really shouldn't matter either way. However a well written comment just comes across a lot stronger than a poorly written one. You're right in that cheaply made mountain bikes such as the classic Huffy and other 'department store' bikes are dangerous and have no place in the world of real mountain biking, however that's an entirely other class of bike. The Airborne Taka is a fairly solid dependable bike that is priced low enough to allow many people to ride and race DH that would not otherwise be able to due to financial constraints. There is nothing 'cheap' about the Taka except for the price really. The Avid Juicy 3's aren't quite as nice as the Juicy 5's, 7's or Code's or the newer Elixer's, but they're definitely a workable brake, and they've been used by thousands of riders with no real problems. The same could be said for the X7 mech, it may not be XO or XX, but it works, and reasonably dependably. I've ridden countless X9 derailleurs, and even an X7 on my old Nomad because that bike broke derailleurs fairly regularly, and I didn't see any point in constantly breaking X0 ones. The X9 was not noticeably worse in performance in most situations. X7 is not a lot different. I would however upgrade the shifters, that does make a difference. There is a place for mid range and lower end products, and there is a huge market for them. As you may have noticed there are several riders here that have raced and won races on Taka's, and raced entire seasons on them with no problems. And there are also some people that have had problems with their shock bushings. So what, pretty much every bike company out there has had similar issues with various expensive 'high end' bikes as well. I'm sorry your friend had problems with his Ironhorse...
  • 1 8
flag freeridemanic (Jan 3, 2012 at 21:16) (Below Threshold)
 your missing the point im trying to make and instead of listening you and others are defending airborn bikes being cheep and not very good. your lulling people into a false seance of security regarding these bikes... at the end of the day yes the spec is good for the price. but then the price is very low and the parts are low performance-high maintenance. the frame likes to destroy itself unless you completely customise the frame and make custom parts. so yea if you want to waste money on fixing a bike that's content on braking and needing babying after every ride then buy a taka but if your smart and want a bike that will last then buy something like a second hand iron horse Sunday, specialised demo (both of those are far better in every way and can be bought for the same price with better components) ect and not a taka or yakuza kumicho. its simple really and anyone who says otherwise is a fool. i have had first hand experience of this happening so please do not try and persuade me otherwise. thank you
  • 9 1
 No I'm not missing your point, I'm simply telling you you're wrong. They're not "not very good", the parts are not necessarily "high maintenance" and no the frame is not "likes to destroy itself" Every bike needs to be looked after, it's not called "babying after every ride" it's called maintenance. I'm not a fool, I've been riding and working in the mountain bike industry longer than you've been alive, and I was a bike mechanic years before that, albeit on road bikes. Your first hand experience is great, I'm glad you have an opinion, but really that's all it is. Your bad opinion from your experience is here with other peoples good opinions from their good experiences. State your opinion once and leave it at that, no one really wants to hear your endless rantings.
  • 5 0
 It's too bad your friend is having a hard time with his Yakuza. Did he ever contact Iron Horese to see if they would help him out - or did he buy it used? I've seen all kinds of bike have all kinds of problems - an acquaintence of mine is on his THIRD Intense, for example. I've watched head tubes snap, down tubes shear in half... there is no shortage of manufacturing issues in the bike world.

I had an issue with the bushings on my Taka - Airborne took care of it IMMEDIATELY, sent me new bushings - problem is solved. Period. Going on about your buddy's Yakuza, again, relfects zero upon Airborne. They stand behind their product.

I know Fort Bill is a world cup course - but guess what? Angelfire has hosted the World Cup, so has Telluride. Saying I raced somewhere and won actually means a lot. It means that this bike, even after an entire season of races and shuttles, is actually quality enough to hold up to 12 straight hours of constant downhill abuse, riding as hard or harder than the next guy. It means it has decent enough handling characteristics to keep up with the joneses. It means that for $1500, a person can get a competent downhill bike to go out and have fun on, and trust enough to push their own limits a little.

Really not trying to persuade you - you have your viewpoint, I can respect that even though I vehemently disagree with your logic. I'm just here to refute the heresay you keep posting with real-world experience on the bike in question, so others will know that there are people enjoying this bike.
  • 1 5
flag freeridemanic (Jan 3, 2012 at 21:56) (Below Threshold)
 haha thats funny because half of the people saying they have raced on them and have had no problems with them are people riding for airborne (by the looks of things)... and yes they are not very good. please explain to me how a beginners bike that constantly requires maintenance and has linkage problems witch the only way you can remedy them is by customising the linkage and getting custom made parts is good? yes you cant because it is not.

my 09 norco was bought second hand for about the same price a taka cost and it has not failed me once. its a sweet bike and was virtualy new when i bought it. and it had components far better than the taka. i know you have been in the bike industry for a very long time but that dose not make any difference. my friend rarely rode his bike witch was new and the only time he did ride it was not even on dh tracks and trails and it still broke. his dad and step dad are both full trained bike mechanics who have been fixing and building bikes as long as you and they still say its a piece of trash. i know a fair bit about bike and how they are built and work. i race dh in the uk and ride pretty much every day i also know how to look after a bike. so i am very well capable of telling and giving a reliable opinion about the taka.

its a cheaply made, ok equipped bike that requires constant maintenance to keep it running ok. and customisation done to the linkage to stop it ovaling the linkage plates from new. the cost of owning one and having to tune, maintain and customise it to stop it from braking itself far outweighs the good points of the bike. that's all there is too it.
  • 11 0
 Matt (freeridemanic) since when was Adams Dad and stepdad both qualified bike mechanics?! haha :L, you have done one race which was on grass and alot of the Saterday your norco was in bits and you were attempting to fix it and mike spotted you used two crown races (one on top of the other) pushing into the bottom of your headset so you dont know tooo much about how to fix and look after bikes. Your noco is your first downhill bike as your mongoose was a free ride bike which i can also remember that was always broken too? :L so i dont think you can really give other people advise on how to maintain bikes. Also you have only ridden Ramsgill that was all grass and pretty easy on the bikes and fort william for a day? couple of runs? so really you havn't ridden a huge amount of downhill.
  • 11 0
 im gonna keep this straight and to the point unlike you all, freeridemanic stop chatting shit.
  • 3 0
 freeridemanic, what you don't understand is that the problem with the rear end on the Airbonre was related to Marzocchi parts and not anything else. I own one that's been upgraded with a Vivid and it is perfect and has been on countless runs at Snowshoe and several other DH venues with not even a hiccup. I will give you partial credit: the Juicys are not the best brakes, but Airborne isn't the only company that offers them on their DH bike. Mongoose has Elixir 1's on their Boot'r and they are the same brake as the Juicy's with just a refresh and new name to be in the Elixir line (SRAM is doing away with the Juicy name this year). The Boot'r is a $2500 USD rig. Scott has Juicys on their $3000 USD Gambler 30. Now, on my own personal rig I wore the Juicys out and replaced them with Elixir R's, but even then anything with only two pistons per caliper instead of 4 like the CODEs is a compromise for DH. I will eventually upgrade to 4 piston calipers as my budget allows and my riding improves. Which is why I was the perfect demographic for the Taka. I didn't want to drop huge $$ on a rig to get into the sport, but once I found out that I loved it, I can upgrade my bike over time if I want to. Here is a bit of constructive advice: Before you jump into the fray and bash/comment about a product that you don't even own, you should take the time to educate yourself first. You may also consider going back to school to learn punctuation and grammar. Then, and only then, would people take you seriously when you post.
  • 7 0
 freeridemanic has juicy 3's on his norco btw
  • 7 0
 He also is trying to sell the same idea whilst slagging it off...Macmahones (give it a google)....cheap copies of good designs....
  • 7 0
 freeridemanic is pretending to know what he is talking about. matthew harding, shut up.
  • 6 0
 harding your bike is a entry level bike, its an old norco for gods sake, stop thinking you know it all you brain dead twit
  • 5 1
 'Finish him!'
  • 3 0
 i think he got the message
  • 5 0
 What a penis.. I have a Carrera Banshee with a £10 mech from the buysell and some knackered 55's.. Dare i say it probably runs better than his norco.. Matt, Stop trying to act like you know everything and ride your bike.
  • 2 0
 Hm, i never expected my comment to spawn this big of argument... It doesn't really matter if the Taka is good quality or not, but everyone is entitled to have their opinion about it regardless. Yes, it is a budget dh bike. Yes, it does not have the latest and greatest components, but you have to look at the price and take it for what it is. A budget bike. Point is, we all like bikes here, so if you don't like this one then great you don't have to, but let the people who do like it enjoy it. Who cares if you don't have the latest and greatest components, i don't have them on my bike since i cant afford them, but that doesn't stop me from riding the shit out of it anyways. So, please, quit bitching at each other and go ride or something.
  • 6 0
 i like mountain cycling because it is fun. it also doesnt matter what bike you own aslong as you love it.
  • 2 0
 ^ well said.
And brigadierBuege.. Freeridemanic will argue about anything..
  • 4 0
 Freeride:

"please explain to me how a beginners bike that constantly requires maintenance and has linkage problems witch the only way you can remedy them is by customising the linkage and getting custom made parts is good?"

Ok, it goes like this: Received bike from Airborne. Assembled it. Rode it. Back end felt funny. Contacted Airborne. Airborne sent new bushing for the shock. Installed bushings, and issue with the back end solved.

How old is your friends Yakuza? Iron Horse has been out of the game for a while... did he by it used, like you are suggesting? He bought a used bike didn't he? Just like you recommend others to do, just like you did. Apparently, your bike has not been so trouble-free either. And guess what, you don't have a warranty or company support to fall back on. You don't have to like Airborne bikes, but you shouldn't talk so much smack about something you don't really know.

Santacruz-rider-09 has basically told us all the untold story regarding your bike, you are pretty much discredited. Until you've purchased a bike from Airborne, you can't really pass judgement on it. Your "Opinion" is ill informed.

Again, not trying to persuade you at all - just here to refute your opinionated, smack-fill posts with some facts.

going to work now, and have a lunchtime sesh. scheduled aboard the Taka. Cheers.
  • 2 0
 Jerry, if there's anything we've learnt from this it is that freeridemanic is not worth wasting your valuable shredding time on. With respect, stop posting!
  • 4 0
 We See a lot of Takas at Highland, inexpensive, rugged and already proven by Ironhorse. I'm not sure why but I like Airborne, they've been around for at least ten years. Great pics Ian,like the shot of the 3 cyclocrossers hiking.
  • 1 1
 It has to have been a LOT longer than that. I just watched the movie Vacation and there is a shot of an Airborne van outside the sporting good store where he buys a gun. That movie was made in 1983. Unless it happens to be a different company....?
  • 3 19
flag kona-jon (Dec 29, 2011 at 7:07) (Below Threshold)
 Will i wish you saw mine when i had it, thing was a pile of junk. I ended up getting airborne to take it back and refund my money.
  • 12 0
 Jonathan, you always forget to tell people the true facts regarding your issues with the Taka. You rode the bike with play in the shock bushings entirely too long to the point where it wallowed out the shock eye. The problem was with a Marzocchi part, and the fact that you failed to address the issue quick enough. It wasn't an Airborne part, nor was it a problem with the frame. Airborne did right by you and took it back after an entire season of riding, how many companies would do that? Plus you didn't even send back a complete bike, all Airborne got back were pieces and parts.
  • 1 13
flag kona-jon (Dec 29, 2011 at 7:31) (Below Threshold)
 Dude, the only thing they didnt get back was a rear brake because I didnt have it. And I did address the issue, I received multiple new shocks from them, tons of new bushings, and they even sent me an entirely new bike through warranty. This thing is junk, nothing they tried to do fixed this issue for me, thats why they refunded my money, after they straight up told me they couldnt fix it.
  • 10 0
 That bike was poorly maintained and abused. It was missing more than just the brakes. You got a free bike basically for an entire season and then sent it back for a free refund. You should be bashing on Marzocchi and not Airborne since your beef is with the rear shock and Airborne went over and above to help you. If you treat the rest of your bikes the way you treated your Taka, you can count on more issues in the future.
  • 2 12
flag kona-jon (Dec 29, 2011 at 8:09) (Below Threshold)
 Both Taka's that I got, brand new, had play in the rear shock right out of the box. It is Airborne's fault because they should have never sent out a product they knew was going to fail, and then say its Marzocchi's problem. I was given many sets of bushings and multiple rear shocks, the entire time I was riding that bike I was assured by both Eric and Jeremy that it would be fine, and they would keep sending me new parts. You clearly do not know the whole story behind this, Airborne did everything possible to help me, the point is that nothing they did could fix their bike's problems. If you would like to take this any further feel free to contact me through a private message.
  • 8 0
 Jonathan, I do know the whole story. The problems were with a Marzocchi product and Airborne did everything to help you that they could including an eventual full refund, and in exchange you send them a broke-dick, abused, partial bike and then bash on them on multiple forums. If you really wanted to keep things private, you should have done so in the first place by not bashing Airborne repeately online. You are young, I understand that. Maybe someday you will grow up and take responsibility for your own actions. Until then, heaven help anyone who buys a used bike from you.
  • 10 1
 Get a room!
  • 8 0
 mate you've clearly said that the fault was in the shock, why didnt you send it to marzocchi? most bike companies wouldnt even deal with a faulty shock. sounds like pretty damn good customer service to me. they even refunded you all your money after a season. whats with the hate. they are budget bikes, and designed for riders who wanna get into the sport. if your not happy with the performance nut up and spend a bit more on a higher spec bike.
  • 2 0
 my taka had loose shock bushings as well...... airborne replaced them free twice! both new sets never fixed the play, so i just fixed it the old fashioned way.......on my own............after a couple measurements i found out the depth of the shock eye was less than the combined depth's of the ends of the bushings that go into the shock eye, which turned into side to side play realy fast even though it felt tight upon instillation, i simply milled them to the proper specs and my bike has been MONEY! This may not fix everyones but as a precaution everyone with a TAKA should check for this.......Airborne gets a deffinite A+ for customer service!
  • 3 0
 Hey Ian I saw this earlier this year and it was great and the Flight crew did a great job too.
To all you out there that want to read more on the TAKA's I write, test ,and race for a little (Growing) website based in So-Cal known as mtnbikeriders.com. I think we were one of the first to do a full test on the TAKA dh bike, our website team "AIRBORNE RANGER's" is also racing the TAKA's and GOBLIN's as a co-team mtnbikeriders.com Airborne Bicycles.
If anyone wishes to read more about the Taka and Goblin please go to the website and check it out, I think a lot of amateur racers will be impressed at how well we did on bike's that didn't have to cost over $4000.00

Thanks Pinkbike for letting me post this.
  • 3 0
 I race for MTNBIKERIDERS.COM and I race DH I took the overall series championship and the #1 Plate this year at the SOUTHRIDGEUSA.COM Series on a Completely Stock Taka and Loved every moment of it. Great Bike Airborne and thanks for the help you guys are great. Here is a story from our site showing all of our finishes and how we did as a team with Airborne Bikes.
www.mtnbikeriders.com AIRBORNE RANGER’S AND THEIR AIRBORNE Bicycles
  • 1 2
 that means nothing its not the bike that makes you fast its the rider... put gee Atherton on a taka and he will still be virtually as fast as he was on his commencal...
  • 4 0
 Stop blaming your tools then..
  • 2 0
 Great shots Ian! I wish I could have been there to meet you and be a part of the shoot. I was on the Flight Crew last year. I have to say it was the greatest experience I've had since I've been in the cycling world. Everyone at Airborne is great! (Company and Flight Crew members). I still can't believe I got to be a part of it. I'm actually kind of sad now seeing what all they did this year, but I can't complain since I got to do it last year. As far as the bikes, what do you want for the prices that they charge? I think what they're doing is great. I have a Taka and a Zeppelin Elite that I ride all the time (even with 3 Klein's and some other high end bikes in my stable). You can always upgrade parts. My Taka is stock except for a Funn bar, stem and pedals. My friends and I have THRASHED on the Taka and the thing is still like new. My fork has been pretty sticky the whole time, but that's not Airborne's fault. I also used my Zeppelin Elite for the entire Georgia State championship series this year. No the bike wasn't completely stock, but that's why there are tons of aftermarket parts to upgrade with. Being a part of Airborne actually got me back into the race scene. I had my Klein stolen back in 2006 and had just about given up riding until I got on with the Flight Crew. I built my Zeppelin Elite up and ended up getting 6th place out of 57 riders for the whole 6 race series this season. And I'm not still on the Flight Crew so I'm not trying to sell anything or do anything like that. The Airborne guys (and girls) are just great people. To me, there's more to a bike company than just the product. Airborne to me is a good product, great people and great times. Just my 2 cents. I'm not calling anyone out or responding to any of the other comments. Just saying what I feel.
  • 5 1
 The price you pay is SOMETIMES a reflection of what you get but OFTEN just a reflection of EXECUTIVE BONUS and not materials or Employee wages.
  • 2 0
 At the risk of being rude, this was literally the least interesting video I have ever seen. A bunch of spandex clad XC racers mullng around while a bunch of chesty middle aged men have close ups taken of them filming people riding everyday trails.
  • 5 0
 Great shots, btw Smile Those sandstone bluff things look fun...
  • 8 0
 Jonathan,
Hey, this Eric....on here talking to you as Eric (the rider not as an Airborne figure) I too love talking about bikes..... I am glad you appreciate all that we did for you. I would like you to know though, that the bike you had you "issues" with is MY bike now and it's been to Snow Shoe twice with a total for three straight back to back days of riding each visit. as well as several other DH trips under it's belt under my ownership. The bike has a RS vivid on it and it's tighter than SEAL's a$$. just thought you should know that. The bike is SOLID! .. Have a great New Year! Thanks Ian for all the great pictures. I hope everyone gets the chance to get out and have a New years RIDE!
  • 3 0
 Airborne SHOULD really think about shipping to Europe or having a dealer or something like that....... It's a shame those bikes are just for US guys
  • 5 5
 your not missing much i had a yakuza now im on a demo... its like going from a prius to an aston martin
  • 1 1
 people seem to not understand that cheep often means not very good. :S i wasted over £1000 on a mongoose bdd similar to a taka worse decision ever.
  • 1 0
 You obviously cannot compare a Kumicho to a Demo... Please. I had a Kumicho for 2 years, it was my entry bike, not one problem, for the $1300 I paid, not one problem in 2 years, I would have never entered the sport if I had to spend $3700 on a bike, even if it is a rocket. I mean, now I would buy a Demo anytime, and enjoy every $ I pay for it, but you cannot learn on a bike that has 20 different setup possibilities, and you're crashing all the time and you won't even use that super fork or shock, or super brakes you have on that Demo if it is your first month. Everyone has their own opinion on things, and that is fine. For me, Airborne has a pretty clear target on the market they want to get to, and there is no other bike maker on those prices, here in Europe bikes are so expensive.
Airborne bikes do great to get you into the sport, as entry bikes, and then, when you learn how to appreciate a good bike with $s on it, you then move on.
  • 1 0
 no one posted about the cross bikes. there freaking sweet.i want one maybe the next cross bike i get when the parts are done on my redline. its cheaper than my redline conquest pro but just as good maybe better. i mean my bike has rival parts but i mean bb5 brakes but id chang them to 7s. Ahead Sealed Cartridge 1 1/8" . my bike isnt sealed. i do not know much about a bb30 bottom bracket, but it dosnt have a carbon seat post like my bike. only things i would change on it bb5 to 7. add cross tabs.
  • 2 0
 " targeted at the everyday rider with a smaller budget".
"crew of "Wingmen" who are chosen from everyday people that like to ride bikes, and also like to talk about it"

I like it..!

Nice bikes...!
  • 4 2
 aren't these the fellas that take iron horse bikes and put new stickers on them? great shots anyways.
  • 2 1
 Yea the taka is just a yakuza Razz
  • 3 0
 Airborne released several new models this year - notably the Wingman (DJ bike), Goblin (29er), and the Delta, a disc-equipped CX bike. Just sayin'...
  • 4 11
flag justincs (Dec 29, 2011 at 5:45) (Below Threshold)
 Well it's about time Wal-mart put together a decent bike team !!!
  • 3 2
 I think its funny that two of the riders are wearing kits with Specialized and Kona plastered on them while riding Airbornes. I'm sure the sponsors love that.
  • 2 0
 Awesome shots man.. Love the scenery Smile
  • 2 0
 Awesome stuff Ian! nice to wake up to this!
  • 2 0
 Great to see a little bit of a plug for collegiate racing and the MWCCC!
  • 1 0
 Another awesome video filmed and edited by Marty Tank:

youtu.be/6ju3gZH8UFM
  • 1 0
 those look great Ian, love the compostition of the XC ones in particular, really eager to get out with the camera now Smile
  • 1 0
 great video Ian. I like that stuff, would be cool in the future to see some of your more advanced lighting set ups.
  • 1 0
 They're coming...
  • 1 0
 i've been wanting to own their delta CX bike but shipping here to canada is a whopping $300 USD!
  • 1 0
 Wow... XC shots on the homepage are rare... I just wish XC Shots in POD's too...
  • 1 0
 How did that kid manage to cut his leg?
  • 1 0
 Riding through a bush...
  • 2 0
 And that "kid" is a full grown wild man named Dan. Smile
  • 1 0
 Thanks for the BTS vid. Looking forward to more of those.
  • 1 0
 Cool men! very nice shots
  • 1 0
 the others were cool but the DH ones look abit point and shoot
  • 1 0
 DH = IRON HORSE YAKUSA :/
  • 1 0
 is that a nikon d2hs? if it was it would be the same camera i have.
  • 1 0
 Nikon D3s
  • 1 0
 i wonder how theyd like one rider riding all the bikes for a shoot?
  • 1 0
 u need two people to push the dh bike up the hill
  • 1 2
 So did ironhorse just morph into airborne? Every single bike looks like an old ironhorse model.
  • 3 0
 Airborne released several new models this year: Tthe Wingman (DJ bike), Goblin (29er), and the Delta, a disc-equipped CX bike. Check their website, the new models are solid.
  • 1 0
 wonderful!
  • 1 2
 I find it funny that in the video it takes two of them to hike his bike up... and they still struggle...
  • 4 0
 Yeah it's a little steep, whenever you can stand up straight and almost touch the ground in front of you it's a sign..
  • 1 1
 Oh didn't realize how steep it was, just looked a bit funny. Razz Looks like you got some sweet shots though!
  • 1 0
 Nice specialized jersey!
  • 1 0
 MIZ! ZOU!!
  • 1 2
 So they're actually using photos with their own bikes now......







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.048025
Mobile Version of Website