Kali Releases Interceptor 2.0 Trail Helmet

Aug 7, 2023 at 6:38
by Kali Protectives  
The Interceptor 2.0 is the latest trail helmet from Kali Protectives. We loved the original Interceptor s commitment to safety with its RHEON Low Density Layer for addressing rotational and Low G hits and Cassidian Nano Core for energy dissipation for major impacts.

PRESS RELEASE: Kali

The Interceptor 2.0 is the latest trail helmet from Kali Protectives. We loved the original Interceptor’s commitment to safety with its Rheon Low Density Layer for addressing rotational and low G hits and Cassidian Nano Core for energy dissipation for major impacts.

The Interceptor 2.0 is the latest trail helmet from Kali Protectives. We loved the original Interceptor s commitment to safety with its RHEON Low Density Layer for addressing rotational and Low G hits and Cassidian Nano Core for energy dissipation for major impacts.

At the core of Rheon technology is an energy-absorbing super polymer. It is soft and flexible in its natural state but absorbs energy by stiffening when subjected to force. When formed using our patented computational design techniques, Rheon is created into what is known as a metamaterial. Delivering new properties that were previously thought impossible with conventional materials. 

The Interceptor 2.0 is the latest trail helmet from Kali Protectives. We loved the original Interceptor s commitment to safety with its RHEON Low Density Layer for addressing rotational and Low G hits and Cassidian Nano Core for energy dissipation for major impacts.

Casidion Nano Core is a revolutionary product for safety headwear designed to protect the head from the kinds of dangerous traumas caused by impact and shock. The technology is based on the most recent research into the dynamics of accidents and is designed to protect the most delicate and fundamental part of the human body, the brain. The scientific research that led to the development of Casidion is based on the need to provide a solution that would go beyond the performance of all other materials commonly used for the production of protective headwear.

We use Supervent technology, where we add injection molded polycarbonate vents with an inner skeleton to create larger size vents and disperse energy across a larger area allowing us to use a softer EPS density and retain overall strength. We’ve also included TPR glass grippers for easy to load sunglass storage that fits a wide range of sunglasses. 

The Interceptor 2.0 is the latest trail helmet from Kali Protectives. We loved the original Interceptor s commitment to safety with its RHEON Low Density Layer for addressing rotational and Low G hits and Cassidian Nano Core for energy dissipation for major impacts.

First up on the redesign was a better visor. This visor offers more coverage, looks awesome and has two easily adjusted positions to dial in your preference. It uses alloy screws to keep the visor firmly attached while using a flexible material in the event of a crash.

The Interceptor 2.0 is the latest trail helmet from Kali Protectives. We loved the original Interceptor s commitment to safety with its RHEON Low Density Layer for addressing rotational and Low G hits and Cassidian Nano Core for energy dissipation for major impacts.

Secondly, we went to work on the fit. We updated the Interceptor 2.0 with the Frequency Fit System with a 3-position vertical adjust to really lock in your fit. We then updated the web dividers to our new Slide Fix easy adjust dividers that are svelte, sit flush with your face and allow you to find an optimal position. We include two sets of antimicrobial pads, the bug net pad comes on the helmet and the summer pad is in the box.

Finally, we finished the Interceptor 2.0 with the beloved Fidlock magnetic buckle and with that Kali Protectives is proud to reintroduce the Interceptor 2.0.

The Interceptor 2.0 is the latest trail helmet from Kali Protectives. We loved the original Interceptor s commitment to safety with its RHEON Low Density Layer for addressing rotational and Low G hits and Cassidian Nano Core for energy dissipation for major impacts.

“One of my jobs at Kali is to test ride our products," said Brad Waldron, Kali Founder. "The improvements by our development team to the fit system, visor function and improved looks has changed the Interceptor 2.0 from a helmet I need to ride to the helmet I want to ride. These changes have made the Interceptor 2.0 my go-to helmet.” The Kali Interceptor 2.0 is available immediately at your favorite Independent Bicycle Shops and Kali Protectives website. MSRP: $160.00.

The Interceptor 2.0 is the latest trail helmet from Kali Protectives. We loved the original Interceptor s commitment to safety with its RHEON Low Density Layer for addressing rotational and Low G hits and Cassidian Nano Core for energy dissipation for major impacts.

About Kali Protectives: Since 2008, our goal has been to create the safest helmets on the market, so you have peace of mind while out on your favorite roads, trails, and jumps. We strive to keep pushing the envelope with the best designs and materials and to implement useful protection into all of our helmets regardless of their intended use or price point.

The Interceptor 2.0 is the latest trail helmet from Kali Protectives. We loved the original Interceptor s commitment to safety with its RHEON Low Density Layer for addressing rotational and Low G hits and Cassidian Nano Core for energy dissipation for major impacts.


Author Info:
KaliProtectives avatar

Member since Apr 16, 2011
61 articles

41 Comments
  • 26 0
 I had a road crash at 44 mph last week that could have been a lot worse. Good thing I have the tuck and roll technique mastered from the MTB all these years. Anyway, felt my head tap the pavement. Later that day I checked my Kali helmet and the shell was cracked and took 90% of the impact. They work!
  • 13 0
 Sorry to hear you went down, but glad your ok. Make sure to contact us and take advantage of the life time crash replacement. info@kaliprotectives.com
  • 1 0
 @kali-brad: Thank you. I did get an RMA and sent it in.
  • 1 0
 @kali-brad: is there a Canadian distributor now? The last helmet I tried to send back on crash replacement cost so much to ship (crashed helmet to you in California and new one back to me in BC) that just buying a new helmet was less.
  • 2 0
 @handsomedan: We do have a Canadian distro A1 Sports. Shipping is crushing us all, I am bummed to hear about your experience, we need to fix that.
  • 2 0
 @kali-brad: Is there a difference in fit between this model and an older Maya?
  • 10 0
 I really like Kali's focus on safety, and it appears the looks of the helmet have improved with this latest revision too.
  • 4 0
 Me too. I'd just like to see some better scores on Virginia Tech's helmet safety ratings and I'd buy these in a hurry.
  • 2 0
 @herbertmarcusavich: Those scores are not indicative of a safe helmet full stop. That is one Uni doing their own tests and do not adhere to stricter safety standards such as ASTM.
  • 4 0
 @herbertmarcusavich: We need to remember that labs are going to have biases, not towards brands but towards a type of testing. Labs are creating a near perfect testing environment in order to get consistent results that they are happy with. Perfect crashes simply don’t exist. I firmly believe in using multiple labs to get a well-rounded picture along with incorporating real world data. There are so many variables in a crash that aren’t factored into these methods. Personally, we have taken 5 star rated helmets to other labs and each one came back with different data. Does this mean I think V-tech is not relevant or wrong? Absolutely not, just different data points. I look forward to publishing our data, testing methods and our own biases soon.
  • 5 0
 @kokofosho: It is possible to get 5 stars but not have a helmet that is legal to sell in the US because it does not pass the CPSC standard. it's different testing philosophies. V-tech uses a Algorithm that favors oblique impacts, this is important, but more or less important then linear impacts? still a much debated subject in the helmet world.
I'm a fan of the testing done at University of Strasbourg, v-tech started with American football helmet testing, they use that data to create an injury index. the testing equipment is based on football helmet testing. does this mean the data is wrong, no, just different data points. Strasbourg uses data from bicycle crashes to create their own rating system. different data points.
  • 3 0
 Without test data, I can't be certain whether Kali products are more protective, but at least they're making the effort. Too many helmets in this price range use nothing more sophisticated than a one-piece, single density EPS core, a two-piece shell, and flashy industrial design. You can get all those things on a mid-level model in last year's "colorway" for $50 when they go on sale.

Kali's logic makes sense and establishes safety features as a point of differentiation, rather than brands one-upping each other on vent count or how much carbon weave is on display.
  • 3 0
 Virginia Tech are my go to when I need to pick a new helmet based on data and not just on marketing sales pitch. Problem is, Kali's helmet's got terrible ratings so I imagine we won't see anymore of their helmets tested by this independent institution, too bad.
  • 3 0
 @Balgaroth: "Terrible" might be a bit strong, but yes, the ratings were disappointing. Even so, it's always a good thing when helmet companies force each other to compete on safety features. Some features and some executions will be more effective than others, of course.
  • 2 0
 @Balgaroth: the testing doesn’t really mimic real world crashing and in my mind favours slip plane helmets. In reality you have hair, skin and a torso. Also, I don’t believe there is a test that shines a light on the benefits of dual density foam yet, which seems like it should reduce concussions.
  • 5 0
 @Balgaroth: Actually, I am fascinated by the V-tech testing, We have done testing at labs all around the world. Labs have biases, not bias toward a brand but bias toward a type of testing. Lab testing is comparative data, rarely real world. Trying to duplicate V-tech’s test methodology is not easy. We have even taken other brand 5 star rating to other labs, finding different results. V-tech choses to use test methods not supported by the CPSC. That is why you can have a 5 star rated helmet and not have a helmet legal to sell in the US. Does that make their testing not legitimate, no it’s good comparative data. We went to Dynamic Research (DRI) with the goal to understand how to match the V-tech testing. There are a few hurdles to overcome. They have chosen to use the same equipment used for testing football helmets, is this wrong? No, it is just a different set of parameters. They have also used brain trauma models again based on football injuries. Again, wrong? No, it’s just another unit of measure. From my observation football has a great deal of oblique impacts, football helmets frequently impact and slide past each other. This is creating an oblique impact and rotation of the brain. Something that MIPS has been saying is the most important impact to protect you from. Virginia tech runs their data through an algorithm that assigns a star rating, they were kind enough to share that algorithm, we believe it is weighted towards rotational impacts more relevant to football, lowering the importance of linear impacts. Is this wrong? This continues to be debated by those who test helmets. I personally believe we need a wider range of protection. I'm still studying and learning.
  • 1 0
 @kali-brad: Great response, Brad, and interesting insights. I can't verify how Kali helmets protect or how they compare to others, but I believe Kali is trying harder than most and has been a significant driver of public awareness, pressure on manufacturers to do better, and innovative materials and construction.

@handsomedan: Exactly! Most headforms have no shear movement, so it's predictable such test equipment strongly favours helmets that facilitate shear movement. Real heads allow considerable shear movement. It's unknown to me whether this fully negates the need for helmets to allow shear movement or whether "more is more", but it surely reduces the real-world benefit of such mechanisms versus the test results on rigid headforms.

Dan, to expand on your point about multi-density foams, it's likely even more true with non-isotropic materials, metamaterials, strain-hardening materials, etc.
  • 6 0
 Not even this can protect you from UCI’s garbage coverage.
  • 3 0
 Love my Kali products,

They don't have the best dealer network or color schemes (get it together guys)

The tech is top notch, and I prefer the ldl to creaky slippy MIPs any day.
  • 4 0
 Great company. Have listened to a podcast or two with the guys from there and they really care and know what they're doing!
  • 1 0
 Have had my Kali since I got back to riding in 2017. It is one of the only helmets I have found that fit my head shape properly. Has the shape inside changed much? Most helmets I have put on had a pressure point in the front. Also, agree on colors. Mine is orange, good to stand out in the woods.
  • 2 0
 Love the whole Kali approach, but also a big fan of visibility.

Need a hi-viz color Brad (you've heard this from me previously).
  • 5 3
 I tried an A.I. detector for the first time on this. Results:
100% A.I. and 0% human.
  • 1 0
 Yeah, it reads like an AI written article. Slightly weird sentence and grammar arrangements.
  • 1 0
 The bots are downvoting this comment. Wink
  • 2 0
 I just learned how to use my iphone 6 ... AI? what's that?
  • 2 1
 Having said that, it thinks the rest of these comments are 85% A.I. and I'm pretty sure that's not the case..
  • 1 0
 I like the helmet, though I don't quite understand how a material that hardens will absorb impact.
  • 1 0
 It’s not a material. It’s a metamaterial.
  • 1 0
 @VtVolk: Say that again, but make it mean something.
  • 2 0
 It doesn't becomes as solid as a rock upon impact, it just firms up as much as needed to not "bottom out" from a hard impact. If executed properly, such a material will be as soft as it can be or, to put it another way, as firm as it needs to be for a given impact.
  • 2 0
 @R-M-R: Thanks. Sounds great in theory. Hope it's as good in practice.
  • 2 0
 @noapathy: if I remember correctly, the Rheon insert in Rapha trail pads gave them the best impact diffusion in an enduro mag test of any without a hard shell. I figure it’s a better 3DO. So my ears are open.
  • 1 0
 I'd say bring back the Shiva but the Aircraft II is too good.
  • 2 0
 on it!
  • 1 0
 Great looking helmet! Safe too!
  • 1 0
 I only wear a full face...
  • 1 0
 @kali-brad - Any chance an invader 3.op0 is in the works?
  • 1 0
 Helmets...
  • 1 0
 So many helmets....
  • 1 0
 The Lanusse is loose!







Copyright © 2000 - 2023. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.045114
Mobile Version of Website