With so many World Cup riders in Fort William from the National Downhill Round 2 this weekend it would have been rude for us not to have a look at some of their bikes.
Sam Hill's Nukeproof Dissent
Aimi Kenyon's Santa Cruz V10
Loris Revelli's Canyon Sender
Florent Payet's Scott Gambler
Camille Balanche's Commencal Supreme DH V5
Phoebe Gale's Canyon Sender
Douglas Vieira's Trek Session
Bernard Kerr's Pivot Phoenix
Harry Molloy's Nukeproof Dissent
Loris Vergier's Trek Session
Thibaut Daprela Commencal Supreme DH V5
Andreas Kolb's Atherton AM.200M.1
Luca Shaw's Canyon Sender
Laurie Greenland's Santa Cruz v10
Author Info:
Mandownmedia Member since Nov 28, 2019
243 articles
Honestly what a shit show.
Being a sponsor of one of the bigger teams and they consequently don't ride their products is one thing.
But Pirrelli being head sponsor of the canyon pirelli team and not even they are riding the tires is just another level.
I’m trying to wrap my head around that new V10. Looks like if you landed sideways or smashed the eff out of a corner you might fold the bike in half. Or maybe that sucker can track the ground on rough and off camber sections like no other bums out there. Would love to hear some more intelligent armchair engineers thoughts on this
If you pull up aimi kenyon's V10 and the new V10, the whole downtube/bottom bracket/rear triangle area is basically the same, I'm sure it's plenty strong then as we haven't heard of V10s folding minus that one argument that greg minaar and a pole had a while back.
The upper linkage and the toptube look different, more standover and a different angle on the linkage probably making for some different progression.
I'm sure the designers did some analysis to make sure it's strong enough, but yeah, that link better hold on tight.
The Commencal's tubes looks even more skinny.
My armchair engineer input is that if you want to experiment with saddle height, you'd just end up cutting up a lot of seatposts until you have the correct one (which keeps the saddle at the correct height and has enough insertion in the seattube).
@mountainsofsussex: Love that you just compared 2 different V10's If you think the latest frame (without a high pivot and they tested that concept) is retro, you dont remember the last high pivot fad that died out (like this one will).
@TheSlayer99: So many bikes have been called out for cracking. Kona, YT, Commencal... Yet on all of them, lots of races have been won. For these top riders (whose bikes see regular inspection and maintenance), that's what matters most.
@vinay: sure but anyone who is receiving support to race world cups is getting their frames checked after every run, and have back up bikes or frames ready when a frame fails. That’s not the point I’m trying to make though. The V4 supreme cracks at the junction between the down tube and the seat tube under the linkages and shock where the average rider wouldn’t look. I guarantee you at least half the v4 supremes on the buy sell are there because they’re cracked or the owners got tired of warranting frames. Go have a look at Paul Aston’s statement about the V4.
If there is one thing that Santa Cruz does, it is building crazy strong carbon frames. They basically weigh as much as other companies' alloy frames but it's mostly from added layers of material. In one of their recent factory tour videos one of their testing lab guys said that their strengh target is usually double what the competition is doing. I'm sure the new V10 won't be an exception.
@TheSlayer99: Yeah, fair. Stil, somehow it is harder to shrug off a bad reputation of a bad era of products even though they've fixed the issue. Look at Manitou for instance. They've been a common OEM suspension supplier until they went through a while with sub-par units. It's only the past few years that I'm seeing more people being excited about their forks again. Similarly with Kona, there really has a been a long while that people claimed to be worried about their frames cracking, even though I think they weren't really cracking anymore at a worrying rate. I just don't think it should take that long for a brand to fix their reputation. The V5 is a new frame. It might crack like the V4 does, it might not. Let's just wait and see. But as for being "concerned" under this particular article, these are pro racers and we can trust their bike are getting the appropriate care and attention. Commencal has had a couple of great seasons under some wild riders in various teams, even on that notorious V4 bike. I can obviously imagine one would be wary of spending their own hard earned money on such a bike if the preceding model has had issues. But then again, to some extend it is always a bit of a gamble to buy the latest and greatest.
@vinay: as a data point, I spent my hard earned money on pre ordering a supreme v5. I saw all the cracking issues they had on the v4 but I figured they would probably make sure not to repeat that with a completely redesigned frame. If one bad version forever ruins a company, nobody should be driving a ford since they released the pinto.
This reminds me of how cannondale was teased as “crack and fail” yet circa 2013 they absolutely dominated the US amateur road racing scene and have cemented their legacy as a top player in alloy road bikes.
You're right. And BTW, disappointed not to see any steel bike in a UK competition. I know steel is not "race compatible", but there must be 1 or 2 aliens that ride some kind of steam punk machines, na?
@danstonQ: Curtis has a pretty cool steel DH bike, but I don't think it is a production bike. But as for "race compatible", I trust you'll see a good few steel bikes on the enduro races or those smaller DH races where one could get away with an enduro frame.
@danstonQ: we'll see some steel dh race bikes during the world cup this year. Neko's Frameworks is testing a steel front triangle, so we might see a FW bike with steel racing, and Contra is sponsoring a couple of Woman to race steel dh bikes.
My lad ran a Float X2 all weekend. There's more and more air shocks coming into racing than i've seen in previous years. Mine was 28th in Youth and absolutely loves the X2 compared to the coils we've been running until earlier this year. He's now put 45 hours on the X2 and raced twice at Rheola in the previous National DH/Gravity and 8 runs this weekend at Fort William. No issues on it at all.
Those commencals are reminding me of the sunn radicals Nico and Cedric used to ride they're getting that skinny, and I didn't even know Dorado's were still a thing.
Schwable,Michelin and Continental are quite good too,even Specialized tires. I think the best overall DH tire is Michelin DH22 over any Maxxis tire or any other brand.
In the last 4 years I only bought 1 Maxxis Assegai DD,rest of the tires I got Michelin and Specialized.
Not really. Pirelli, Conti, Michelin are huge tires manufacturers who can easily afford to donate equipment and sponsor a team to run their products. Maxxis is big MTB player, but a relatively small player in the tire world.
@CaptainSnappy: 3 or 4 years ago you only saw Maxxis in every bike. Now are multiple brands with good products,not just Maxxis. Maxxis is part of a huge tire company (9th largest in the world Wikipedia info hehehe) so not a small player by any means. In some markets their products are very well know outside of Mtb.
Manitou is a surprise. I don't know if I had a bad fork but my Dorado was absolute shit. Blew the seal twice and leaked oil all over the brake caliper, and never felt right.
Even then, it was super heavy up front.
@8a71b4: when was that? 20 years ago!!! They might have updated the design in that time. Look what happened in the urban races with the young pinners smoking it on Dorados.
@Jules15: Would almost put money on it that its more of a R+D partnership then an outright sponsorship. Spesh has some serious R+D potential for Ohlins, not to mention Bruni's apparent keen sense on the bike and outright speed he can go at any moment. Ohlins may sponsor the team but not the riders and Spesh tends to always have the fastest guys at any given point.
@8a71b4: Its easy to have a bad experience with a fork and get unlucky. They are a USD fork so always going to feel heavy up front compared to a traditional air fork. Then folk run full DH tyres with inserts and lots of sealant!!! Wouldnt go USD myself, when its wet (which it often is in Scotland) the mudguard just doesnt look good.
Talk about a snooze fest. Do the new group of pro DHers have any style? Where is the custom paint and interesting component mixes? I could see the same thing by looking at manufacturer's brochures.
The upper linkage and the toptube look different, more standover and a different angle on the linkage probably making for some different progression.
Just my 100% armchair engineer take
If you think the latest frame (without a high pivot and they tested that concept) is retro, you dont remember the last high pivot fad that died out (like this one will).
This reminds me of how cannondale was teased as “crack and fail” yet circa 2013 they absolutely dominated the US amateur road racing scene and have cemented their legacy as a top player in alloy road bikes.
the orange fox fork does not visually match any bike
some bikes that could be awesome are marred by cheesy graphics
They might have updated the design in that time.
Look what happened in the urban races with the young pinners smoking it on Dorados.
(My Dorados were so bad 20 years ago too)
www.specializedgravity.com/nos-sponsors-1?lang=en
They are a USD fork so always going to feel heavy up front compared to a traditional air fork.
Then folk run full DH tyres with inserts and lots of sealant!!!
Wouldnt go USD myself, when its wet (which it often is in Scotland) the mudguard just doesnt look good.
Or my edible is kicking in?
Where is the custom paint and interesting component mixes?
I could see the same thing by looking at manufacturer's brochures.